Arny Krueger wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:03:26 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:40:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


The subject of mental health facilities is one close to Krueger's
heart. His family has probably attempted to have him committed on
more than one occasion, and in all likelihood, has succeeded.

Obviously, a libelous and delusional claim.

Is that like accusing someone you've never met of drug abuse?

It's like accusing someone who shows so many symptoms of, well never
mind.

Too late. I already have plenty of examples.

Besides, Dr. Richman might have said exactly the same thing. And he's
an expert.

No, he just says that he's an expert.


Krueger is lying again. I have not stated that I am an expert in substance
abuse, nor can pathological liar Krueger prove that I've stated anything like
that. It is true that have had a considerable amount of both formatl training
and cllinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of substance abuse.
Krueger has none.

However, Krueger *does* have lots of experience in lying about what other
people have actually said. He continues to do so in this post.



Does this mean that you are a drug expert?

I'm as much as an expert as one gets signing potheads out of the MP's little
room with bars about 4 decades ago.


IOW, Krueger's tenure as an Army clerk shuffling papers has deluded him into
thinking he knows something about substance abuse. IOW, Krueger thinks that 40
year old alleged experiences with marijuana users gives him the right to accuse
others of substance abuse. No doubt that logic was developed in his courses in
Libel 101 and 102.



Is it from personal experience, because it's clear that you don't have
formal
training in that area.

Weil, if it's so obvious that even a washed-up hack like Richman notices it,
what do I have to do with your problems?



A psychotic loser like Krueger is clearly unqualified to even recognize his own
mental illness despite numerous observations by many posters on RAO that have
continuously scoffed at his raging paranoia and severe thought disorder. He's
clearly psychotic.


If it's the former, then perhaps that's an
answer to your belligerant and obnoxious behavior on this group.

It only seems that way to you Weil because you are demonstrably paranoid
about your little, errr habit.


Diagnoses of paranoia from a delusional conman like Krueger who hears voices
tellling him about conspiracies against him on RAO have about as much
credibility as the stories of Charles Manson, Son of Sam, and other sociopathic
liars like Krueger whose psychoses have generated criminal behavior.



But if you're an innocent man Weil, just tell us how you've never taken any
illegeal drug at any time in your life.






I admit it - I'm no expert on illegeal drugs. In fact, I've never heard of
them.

Dave, before you answer any questions posed by obvious nut case Krueger, I
suggest that he be required to disclose *his* use of antipsychotic medications
prescribed by family phyysicians and/or psychiatrists. If he hasn't used them,
I think he should tell us why not, other than the fact that he's been in denial
for many years about his severe psychiatric problems.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
PY 2543 (Florida)
Bruce J. Richman