Dave Weil wrote:


On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:23:22 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message
m
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:50:14 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 03:15:54 GMT, "Spiderant"
wrote:

Lastly, I noticed in this newsgroup that Howard Ferstler posted a
question about Thane equalizers and if anyone had any opinions
about them. Interestingly, of the twenty or so replies, only one
replay related directly to his question. And his name is on my
list.

Since he was mining the group for an article, most people probably
decided not to give him any ammunition.

Paranoia, part #1

His series of requests for
opinions was very suspicious, to say the least.

Paranoia, part #2

and he was trolling
the group as well - that much is obvious.

Paranoia, part #3

I'm wondering if, when at work, Weil gives menus to any diners he
can't personally vouch for.

The diner could be mining his bar for menus, requests from
non-regulars are always suspicious, and they are probably just
trolling him for reading material to fill their dull lives.

Roland, this is exactly why Arnold Krueger is *not* helpful to this
newsgroup. Enabling him as you have done isn't helpful either. You
are, of course, free to decide who to trust.

I think that pointing out Weil's mental difficulties are helpful.

Gratuitous personal attack noted.

Weil gratuitously made this personal with his first personal attack post.

Who knows who fired the first shot. I know that you were already hated
before I ever came on the scene. You were trashing people right and
left shrug.

BTW, it wasn't "paranoia", it was clearly stated by Mr. Ferstler that
he was going to write another article about the dreaded "high-end" and
USENET.

Except Weil that you gratuitously flamed him for being perfectly up front
about what he was doing.

No sir, I didn't "gratuitously flame him". I explained why nobody else
took his bait publically. Also, he wasn't exactly upfront about his
reasons for asking the questions until his last posts.

snip redundant text that is in the OP

He is notoriously afraid and backs down if you even sneeze.

I wouldn't call the usual run of libelous attacks and childish flames from
nutcake RAO regulars like Weil, Middius and Richman a *sneeze*, just because
they should be taken that way.

And you don't think that Mr. Ferstler isn't guilty of "childish
flames", Clyde?

How about your *own* libelous claims against me (which *my* attorney
has on file if I decide to take further action)? Are those excusable?









Krueger's history of maligning RAO posters is very well known and has been
documented for years. As most of us realize, he is mentally ill, and long ago
lost almost all ability to describe anything or anybody in an objective,
realistic fashion.

Even a casual reader can quickly appreciate the fact that this psychotic liar
is consumed by paranoid conspiracy theories in which he imagines that
sockpuppets, cliques of RAO posters, and magazine editors have banded together
to tarnish his reputation. Of course, as with everything else he prints on
RAO, this is just a figment of his imagination.


Bruce J. Richman