Art Sackman wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:43:44 -0400, Howard Ferstler
wrote:

You guys have been pumped dry enough during this series of
exchanges to give me all the poop I need for the article

Well, I'm glad that you've finally realized your material for what it
is.

BTW, when I hear that the article has come out, I'll be sending a
letter to the editor of the magazine that will quote your plagiarized
text and the Quad website text side-by-side so that your loyal readers
can decide for themselves. I wonder if the magazine will have the guts
to publish it.

Here's a quick request from the others here on RAO - would you notify
me privately when the article comes out so that I can send the letter
to the editor?
The problem with Clerkie's planned article goes farther than just
his history of plagiarism. The problem is personal bias against RAO,
as that is the venue where his plagiarism was uncovered. He has an
obvious personal axe to grind, which places another very huge shadow upon
any journalistic exercise aimed at RAO. His efforts are guided more by
personal vendetta than an unbiased search for truth. Clerkie's
professionalism as a journalist is one big stinking joke.










Agreed. The simple fact tha he has committed libel - which can be proven -
concerning the professional activities of several RAO posters - also indicates
that he has no integrity and cannot be trusted to tell the truth.

While I don't know whether any gullible publication that might publish his lies
would publish alternative points of view, I too would like to get an advance
notice of publication possibilities, so that I might submit to the prospective
publisher documented evidence of Ferstler's repeated acts of libel against me
on RAO.

I've also challenged Ferstler and Krueger to (1) publish their libelous claims
about my professional activities in any American print publication that will
accept their false statements, and (2) to notify the legal authorities in the
state of Florida that somebody is posing as a psychologist on RAO and calling
Himself Dr. Bruce J. Richman. Since the latter is also a felony, this presents
them with a great opportunity to present their evidence to the authorities and
have that person arrested. How can they resist this opportunity?

Of course, if they don't *have* any evidence, then once again, they will
exposed as the chronic pathological liars we all know them to be.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
Florida PY 25043



Bruce J. Richman