"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:43:44 -0400, Howard Ferstler
wrote:

You guys have been pumped dry enough during this series of
exchanges to give me all the poop I need for the article

Well, I'm glad that you've finally realized your material for what it
is.

BTW, when I hear that the article has come out, I'll be sending a
letter to the editor of the magazine that will quote your plagiarized
text and the Quad website text side-by-side so that your loyal readers
can decide for themselves. I wonder if the magazine will have the guts
to publish it.

Here's a quick request from the others here on RAO - would you notify
me privately when the article comes out so that I can send the letter
to the editor?
The problem with Clerkie's planned article goes farther than just
his history of plagiarism. The problem is personal bias against RAO,
as that is the venue where his plagiarism was uncovered. He has an
obvious personal axe to grind, which places another very huge shadow upon
any journalistic exercise aimed at RAO. His efforts are guided more by
personal vendetta than an unbiased search for truth. Clerkie's
professionalism as a journalist is one big stinking joke.