"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Carl Valle" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Carl, you seem to have forgotten about the requirement that prove
your own positive hypothesis with actual quotes from specific laws.

Arny, you can obviously read those two acts yourself.

Thanks for not being able to respond to a reasonable request that you
provide reliable independent evidence to support your hypothesis, Valle.

It fully justifies ignoring your claim.



I already provided the quote that makes recording illegal.
but as regards to the acts here is the main point from the DMCA -

``(2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the
public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology,
product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that--
``(A) is primarily designed or produced for the
purpose of circumventing a technological measure that
effectively controls access to a work protected under
this title;
``(B) has only limited commercially significant
purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological
measure that effectively controls access to a work
protected under this title; or
``(C) is marketed by that person or another acting
in concert with that person with that person's
knowledge for use in circumventing a technological
measure that effectively controls access to a work
protected under this title.
``(3) As used in this subsection--
``(A) to `circumvent a technological measure' means
to descramble a scrambled work, to decrypt an encrypted
work, or otherwise to avoid, bypass, remove,
deactivate, or impair a technological measure, without
the authority of the copyright owner; and
``(B) a technological measure `effectively controls
access to a work' if the measure, in the ordinary
course of its operation, requires the application of
information, or a process or a treatment, with the
authority of the copyright owner, to gain access to the
work.

-------
Carl