Martin Tillman wrote:

Eh? You blind too?

Yeah, I'm blind.

Not only have you reduced the dynamic range (which normalisation doesn't
do, so you are not normalising), in some places you have actually
INVERTED the dynamic range!!!

To give you a clue(!), look at the peaks around 11 minutes and 24.5
minutes. In the original the peaks are higher at 24.5 than at 11.
You've made the peaks at 11 higher than at 24.5!

*This* is actually more along the lines of the form of analysis I was
hoping to garner by way of posting the screenshots. Thanks.

I believe I see what you're seeing, however, given the obviously compact
visual nature of that screenshot, every peak you see in the image is not
necessarily being rendered *exactly* as it in reality may be.

Such comparisons will certainly require a more exploded view for more
accurate analysis.

My purpose in posting that particular screenshot was to illustrate the
bogus nature of the charges being hurled against me for introducing
clipping, limiting, compression and reduced dynamic range after having
merely adjusted its amplitude +4.5dB (which brings its loudness more in
line with that of Capitol's 1994 remastered edition.)

You can see my full-width screenshot of Capitol's remastered waveform
here if you still think it might be worth a look as far as comparing
their botch-job to mine:

http://www.mykec.com/mykec/images/20...4_Remaster.png

Myke

--

-================================-
Windows...It's rebootylicious!!!
-================================-