"Lord Hasenpfeffer" wrote in message

That's fair enough, I suppose, given your previous misinterpretions of
just what it is that I'm doing with the WAVs I've been ripping from my
CDs. At least you haven't called me a "Liniot", a "****wit" or a
"USENET troll".

You take great offence for some reason at being named a 'Liniot' after
disparaging practically all major audio editing software on the strength
that your little Linux command evidently does things more completely and
some better that everything else. Not anunreasonable term , I think, in the
circumstances.

I speculated that you were probably a 'USENET troll' because of your
continued posting of ludicrous assertions in this and other newsgroups,
which is sometimes done purely to annoy people and get reactions. I still
find it hard to believe anybody could have not absorbed the good information
provided here, and steadfastly post and post the same erroneous drivel. So
although I suspect that the troll concept is the case, I cannot be certain
(which is why I am bothering to still reply).

It was *not me* who called you a ****wit, (unlike Liniot and troll , a
truely disparaging term that you could legimately take offence at ).
However to do continue to reinforce that impression on people by refusing to
even attempt to understand things that have been painstakingly clarified to
you in both technical and lay terms.

Can you grasp this : Normalising DSOTM from a -4dB peak to a 0dB peak is
exactly the same as turning up your amp/headphone volume approx one
gnat's-cock. There is no increase in dynamic range (the noise floor moves
up too), no "more frequencies" suddenly appear, and nothing is "clearer and
cleaner". It is merely a *minute amount louder* !

Your diatribes against the MFSL CD demonstrate clearly to everybody here
just how little you understand, or appear to want to understand.

geoff