"Paul Vina" wrote in message
news:7_pxb.324551$Tr4.997085@attbi_s03...

ok. the nick is narcolept. not narcolepsy, you make yourself look even
lamer
by doing that.


He did it on purpose.


You're calling me out? hah. Listen, kid. You aren't the
first person in the history of R.A.C to think they know more than other
people here, and not the first to fancy themselves something special
because
of same lame thread.


He never said he knew more than anyone. He strarted these threads so that
a
eneral topic of discussion would be opened for people that don't kave a
good
working knowledge of that topic.


They were here long before you, and the same types of
asshats will be here long after you're gone.


Like you I'd imagine.


I haven't learned a thing from
ICE other than the fact that you will go to great lenghts, well beyong
making yourself look like a ****stick to protect your silly little
thread.


As I said thiese threads aren't for everyone, mostly people that are new
into car audio. Why you think threads like this are "silly" is beyond me.
I'm sure you had to learn it from someone. If they'd have treated you
like
you're treating these threads you'd likely know as much as a lot of the
people on here asking questions.



Paul Vina


so let me ask again. why have threads like this that rehash stuff that has
been discussed to absolute ****ing death here, when groups.google.com has
all the information any newbie could ever need, right from here.

These are the reasons why R.A.C is looked at as n00bland by people
everywhere. It's the same basic newbie discussion day in and day out,
nothing other than basic newbie topics are discussed. If instead of having
threads to relive everything that has ever been discussed here, newbs used
google to find their answers and people actually talked about something
worthwile rather than how to wire subs in series 4x a day, it might not be
such a lame place to be


narcolept
----
hell, web forums blow, and most web forums have 999x the worthwile
discussion as r.a.c