Panzzi wrote:
Pooh Bear wrote in
:
You came here asking for advice and got it.
*Every* single poster said that you needed to address the acoustic
issues of your venue as a priority.
You didn't like it and tried a.a.p.l-s. As warned in advance, you got
totally flamed. Live sound engineers have seen it all before. I can
*personally* tell you how bad a venue like yours will sound ! It's
agonisingly bad. The only time *ever* the band contracting me refused
to pay - despite the obvious problems. Now consider how you're going
to look when you're on the end of that kind of result !
The reason that I post the same question on AAPLS was because one of the
guys here told me I should not post that kind of question in RAP, I
should go there, so I did. But obviously that is a bad suggestion. 
The reason that I asked for suggestion for mixer is obvious, or might be
I didn't state it clear, it is not for the Family Life Center that I
posted before. It is for an upgrade in our sanctuary, so it got nothing
to do with "I ignore the previous suggestion and want to get around with
it". Sorry for the misunderstanding.
No problem.
In which case, I recommend stating the exact requirements you are looking
for as opposed to generalisations e.g. like type of usage basically, and you
will surely get advice regarding the related benefits of differing mixer
designs and features.
There is nothing *better* about the number of busses, unless you know how
many you will actually need. Here lies the rub. A 200 bus mixer is no better
than a 2 bus if you only *need* 2 !
And, seriously, I don't know about you, but obviously, nobody in our
church know about acoustic enough, as a matter of fact, you can't find a
church that include one of each professional among the congegration! But
thing needs to be done, that's why I asked for suggestion. And yes, I
have already contact an acoustic consultant around town to give me a
quote.
I'm genuinely *very* pleased to hear that. I hope it works out well.
Thank you for your feedback.
YW.
Well, actually, I can do what I like. It's called self-determination.
I don't want to go deep into religion, what I would like to say is as a
Christian, even I cannot accept another religions, I still would not
insult anyone about their religions.
Actually, I never hold anything against anyone for holding religious views.
That is admirable in some ways. I have more of a problem with what is
promulgated on the followers' behalf by those who choose to use religions
for their own ends.
For an excellent example see Usama bin Laden. And the way he twists religion
to suit his ends. Sadly, his methods aren't unique to him or his religion.
That is some basic manner, oh yes,
we are in America, we have free speech (hang on, we don't), but the way
you comment(s) will reflect your personality! Who will look bad? Not the
church, not one Christian, but it is YOU, think about it.
That's a matter of opinion, it would seem.
Best luck anyway.
Wishing you well, Graham