Note to 2pid

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

2pid, you claim you want to 'discuss' things. You emphatically deny
that you are merely posting right-wing propaganda.

You've offered up a couple of nuggets recently that cannot pass
unchallenged. One is that a movie I strongly suspect that you've never
seen is a "trainwreck". Again I ask you what you base this on.

You're also very much opposed to diversity training. I'm trying to
find out why you'd be so intolerant as to be against people learning
about other cultures, lifestyles, or why you'd be so opposed to people
learning about racial inequality. You know, the non-blog-initiated
'reasoning' you use.

No, instead you've posted about how intolerance is necessary, even
desireable, and how those of us who mock you, your intense stupidity
and your outdated beliefs are missing some overall 'point'.

Well, 2pid, since I've taken you at your word that you want
'discussion' and have offered twice to politely engage you in
discourse so that you can fully lay out your 'points', so that we, the
great unwashed rabble, can understand and 'benefit' from your God-
given insight.

Since you have decided that such 'discussion' is not worth your
effort, the rational among us can safely conclude that you were
posting propaganda...again, and that there are no rational 'thoughts'
behind your bleating.

Thank you for again proving my point: you are simply a right-wing
propaganda organ with no reasoning behind your posts. You are as
interested in 'discussing' your 'points' as cheney, et al, are
interested in the overall welfare of the citizens of this great
country.

You are a propaganda whore.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

2pid, you claim you want to 'discuss' things. You emphatically deny
that you are merely posting right-wing propaganda.

You've offered up a couple of nuggets recently that cannot pass
unchallenged. One is that a movie I strongly suspect that you've
never
seen is a "trainwreck". Again I ask you what you base this on.

You're also very much opposed to diversity training. I'm trying to
find out why you'd be so intolerant as to be against people learning
about other cultures, lifestyles, or why you'd be so opposed to
people
learning about racial inequality. You know, the non-blog-initiated
'reasoning' you use.

No, instead you've posted about how intolerance is necessary, even
desireable, and how those of us who mock you, your intense stupidity
and your outdated beliefs are missing some overall 'point'.

Well, 2pid, since I've taken you at your word that you want
'discussion' and have offered twice to politely engage you in
discourse so that you can fully lay out your 'points', so that we,
the
great unwashed rabble, can understand and 'benefit' from your God-
given insight.

Since you have decided that such 'discussion' is not worth your
effort, the rational among us can safely conclude that you were
posting propaganda...again, and that there are no rational 'thoughts'
behind your bleating.

Thank you for again proving my point: you are simply a right-wing
propaganda organ with no reasoning behind your posts. You are as
interested in 'discussing' your 'points' as cheney, et al, are
interested in the overall welfare of the citizens of this great
country.

You are a propaganda whore.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 4, 7:11 pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 4, 4:39 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> > wrote:
> > 2pid, you claim you want to 'discuss' things.
>
> with adults capable of mature discourse.

Why, 2pid, I merely asked you why a movie I strongly suspect you
haven't seen is, IYO, a "trainwreck. I'm planning on seeing it, and I
offered you a chance to save me (and any others contemplating seeing
it) the $6 admission. I also asked you specific questions about your
anti-diversity training post. I questioned your sources, like you
always wail about the MSM not doing, y'know?

What is your definition of 'mature discourse'?

> When I want to exchange childish insults,
> I know where to find you.

Nice try, 2pid, but you've worn this trick plumb out. It's a tuckered,
tired attempt to bail...again, on the 'discussions' you say you want
to initiate.

Why not just answer the questions that were posed to you? Perhaps,
then, even other 'adults' will join in and add their views. That's how
real discussions occur, 2pid.

You leave the impression that there is no logic behind your views,
that you do not discuss these things because you cannot counter the
points raised, and that you are indeed nothing but a propaganda whore.
You also prove yourself to be a liar when bleating about how badly you
want to 'save' RAO by offering 'discussions'. That's why most people
draw the conclusion that you're dull and worthless.

Those are not 'insults', 2pid. They are valid conclusions based on the
evidence.

So it appears that you have placed yourself at the very bottom of the
pile for worthwhile posts on RAO, 2pid. That's not a very esteemed
pile to be at the very bottom of.

LOL!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 4, 8:03 pm, "ScottW" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in glegroups.com...
>
> > On Nov 4, 7:11 pm, ScottW > wrote:
> >> On Nov 4, 4:39 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > 2pid, you claim you want to 'discuss' things.
>
> >> with adults capable of mature discourse.
>
> > Why, 2pid,
>
> Moving on.

Oh, we're pretending to be above name-calling? And trying to deke
questions...again because we're suddenly quite offended over a
nickname I lovingly gave you well over a year ago? LOL!

Sorry, 2pid. Again, you're being *way* too transparent. You're just
afraid to 'discuss' 'points' that you have no basis for. And you prove
me right...again: you're just a propaganda whore.

I think I'll go spend some of my "RIP" pension. What a "Shhhhithead" I
must be! LOL!

Can you begin to understand now how, announced like a grade on a
professor's door, you prove yourself to be an imbecile and a hypocrite
every single day? Even being crippled with your enfeebled 'mind' you
surely cannot miss something that obvious, can you?

LOL!