cheney/Obama in 2008!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

I think cheney is angling to be Obama's running partner. Perhaps there
should be a fatwad.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071016/pl_nm/usa_politics_cheney_obama_dc

(Just trying to do my part to keep RAO going, 2pid.)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 16, 6:37 pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Oct 16, 4:25 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> > wrote:
> > I think cheney is angling to be Obama's running partner. Perhaps there
> > should be a fatwad.
>
> >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071016/pl_nm/usa_politics_cheney_obama_dc
>
> > (Just trying to do my part to keep RAO going, 2pid.)
>
> Stick with the protocol or you'll be banned like a Florida democrat.

I couldn't find your 'protocol' anywhere on the Usenet. Are you
pulling stuff out of your ass...again?

[Clyde Slick]

On 16 Oct, 19:37, ScottW > wrote:


>
> Stick with the protocol or you'll be banned like a Florida democrat.
>

A fla Dem was banned from RAO?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 16, 7:46 pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 16 Oct, 19:37, ScottW > wrote:

> > Stick with the protocol or you'll be banned like a Florida democrat.
>
> A fla Dem was banned from RAO?

Was Uncle Howard a republican?

[Clyde Slick]

On 16 Oct, 21:26, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
> wrote:
> On Oct 16, 7:46 pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On 16 Oct, 19:37, ScottW > wrote:
> > > Stick with the protocol or you'll be banned like a Florida democrat.
>
> > A fla Dem was banned from RAO?
>
> Was Uncle Howard a republican?

nope, a dem

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 16, 9:25 pm, "ScottW" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in oglegroups.com...
>
> > On Oct 16, 6:37 pm, ScottW > wrote:
> >> On Oct 16, 4:25 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > I think cheney is angling to be Obama's running partner. Perhaps there
> >> > should be a fatwad.
>
> >> >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071016/pl_nm/usa_politics_cheney_obama_dc
>
> >> > (Just trying to do my part to keep RAO going, 2pid.)
>
> >> Stick with the protocol or you'll be banned like a Florida democrat.
>
> > I couldn't find your 'protocol' anywhere on the Usenet. Are you
> > pulling stuff out of your ass...again?
>
> I think you need to look again....perhaps with a few days
> of diligent ponderous searching the obvious may come to you.

Well, 2pid, you've caught me: I did not even look. The protocol was
obviously something you (or somebody like you) came up with to try to
give their OT jihads some moral footing.

Well, I suppose Ludwig is just as correct as you are...

Lol!

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 said:

> > > Are you pulling stuff out of your ass...again?

> > I think you need to look again....<snip>

> Why do you give him such an opening?

Scottie can't help himself:
http://annoy.com/img/general/gannon7.jpg

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 16, 9:12 pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 16 Oct, 21:26, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> > wrote:
> > On Oct 16, 7:46 pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > On 16 Oct, 19:37, ScottW > wrote:
> > > > Stick with the protocol or you'll be banned like a Florida democrat.
>
> > > A fla Dem was banned from RAO?
>
> > Was Uncle Howard a republican?
>
> nope, a dem

Another reason to ban him.

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 said:

> > > > > Are you pulling stuff out of your ass...again?
> >
> > > > I think you need to look again....<snip>
> >
> > > Why do you give him such an opening?
> >
> > Scottie can't help himself:
> > http://annoy.com/img/general/gannon7.jpg
>
> And we all assumed Gannon was a top.

Good one. Still, when you're on the clock, positioning is secondary.