Dishonesty

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

So, 2pid, let's go back to the discussion of war crimes, like those
you say Kerry committed. (Treason and sedition if you're wondering,
bonehead.)

One position might be that you choose not to answer things that shoot
your 'points' down because you honestly never address things that
counter your little preconceived conclusions. That is a well-known
fact on RAO.

A different take might be that, by posting referenced and documented
information that leads to contrary opinions to your conclusions, I am
guilty of not having a 'discussion' with you. Facts can be, after all,
considered an insult, right? Lol!

So who is more dishonest, 2pid? Someone who points out your extreme
(but surprisingly not fatal) stupidity, or someone who runs and hides
from the very 'discussion' that they wail they want?

WARNING: have somebody read this to you so they can help you figure
out what it all means before you respond.

Now don't be confused, 2pid. This is essentially a rhetorical
question, since I already know the answer. I'm just curious if you are
ever capable of seeing through the fog in your 'mind'.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 9, 6:48 pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Oct 9, 4:15 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> > wrote:
> > That is a well-known fact on RAO.
>
> bzzzzt ....end of discussion....well, it never really got past your
> preconceived irrationality.

Lol! So you claim *not* to disappear when the going gets tough for
you. The facts say otherwise, 2pid.

Ah, but perhaps everybody is a waste of time except you. Nobody "gets
it" except you.

> > A different take might be that, by posting referenced
>
> this from the guy who won't follow a link and provides
> nothing but unsubstantiated opinion in his entire
> "factless" based rant.

Non-answer noted.

> Dishonesty is an appropriate title for your post.

Say it enough and maybe even somebody other than you will believe it
even.

Lol!

What an imbecile.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 10, 2:18 pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Oct 10, 10:50 am, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> > wrote:
> > On Oct 9, 6:48 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 9, 4:15 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > That is a well-known fact on RAO.
>
> > > bzzzzt ....end of discussion....well, it never really got past your
> > > preconceived irrationality.
>
> > Lol! So you claim *not* to disappear when the going gets tough for
> > you. The facts say otherwise, 2pid.
>
> Disappearing is a concept you lack a firm grasp of.
> BTW...even though I'll be out of town for a few days..
> and you can dribble snot to your sinus content,
> I will not have disappeared.

So the question is, are you being stupid here, or dishonest?

Lol! <<< (BTW, 2pid, this spelling is intended, in deference to
you...)

> > Ah, but perhaps everybody is a waste of time except you. Nobody "gets
> > it" except you.
>
> Still trying to hide behind everybody?

Yes. I'm pretty covert.

> I think everybody who is anybody actually resents being forced to
> group with a scumbag like you. You and Middiot, who might as
> well be clones of each other, are a waste of space on my display
> and electrons and disk space in every server you occupy.

I see.

> The slime of usenet aptly described for a different media
> by the late great Frank Zappa.

You are certainly judgemental. That's not such a bad thing, if it is
coupled with introspection, self-awareness, intelligence,
compassion... IOW, the very things you lack.

> > > > A different take might be that, by posting referenced
>
> > > this from the guy who won't follow a link and provides
> > > nothing but unsubstantiated opinion in his entire
> > > "factless" based rant.
>
> > Non-answer noted.
>
> Inability to recognize a spot on answer noted.
> Your motto...don't ever let the truth slow you down.

But it's not the truth, 2pid. It's propaganda, just like everything
you write.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 10, 2:44 pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Oct 10, 12:28 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Oct 10, 2:18 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 10, 10:50 am, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Oct 9, 6:48 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Oct 9, 4:15 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > That is a well-known fact on RAO.
>
> > > > > bzzzzt ....end of discussion....well, it never really got past your
> > > > > preconceived irrationality.
>
> > > > Lol! So you claim *not* to disappear when the going gets tough for
> > > > you. The facts say otherwise, 2pid.
>
> > > Disappearing is a concept you lack a firm grasp of.
> > > BTW...even though I'll be out of town for a few days..
> > > and you can dribble snot to your sinus content,
> > > I will not have disappeared.
>
> > So the question is, are you being stupid here, or dishonest?
>
> Neither...but your childish attempt at limiting choices shows you
> knew that...but very little more.

I'll take that as meaning "I am not being dishonest here."

That just leaves stupid.