View Full Version : Trying hard to understand the 'logic' in toopid's 'mind'
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
November 25th 06, 07:53 PM
That would be the logic of somebody who has never served in the
military, not even for one hour or fraction thereof, trying to make
some obscure 'point' about somebody who retired from military service
by calling them searing, biting, horrible, gut-wrenching names like RIP
or ROOAR.
This even after I agreed with toopid that I never served, was kicked
out, was forced to leave, or that I was incarcerated and therefore
could not have retired. I'd read somewhere that if you agree with the
fantasies of a person with mental difficulties, they'd eventually let
go of their fantasies. It appears that toopid's psychological problems
run far deeper than the normal variety of mental illness.
Please lay out your 'logic,' toopid, as I'm trying to understand it.
Perhaps if you see this 'logic' on cyber-paper, you can recognize for
yourself how weird your thought process is.
With all of the psychological information available on the web these
days I, or somebody else here, may even be able to help you work
through some of your mental issues. (Unfortunately, raising your IQ is
probably not possible, though.)
LOL!
Moron.
ScottW
November 26th 06, 07:28 PM
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> That would be the logic of somebody who has never served in the
> military, not even for one hour or fraction thereof, trying to make
> some obscure 'point' about somebody who retired from military service
> by calling them searing, biting, horrible, gut-wrenching names like RIP
> or ROOAR.
LoL...stop whining. A real starship trooper can take what he
gives.
>
> This even after I agreed with toopid that I never served,
which makes you an admitted liar.....
but I'm sure that doesn't bother you at all.
ScottW
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
November 26th 06, 11:14 PM
ScottW wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> > That would be the logic of somebody who has never served in the
> > military, not even for one hour or fraction thereof, trying to make
> > some obscure 'point' about somebody who retired from military service
> > by calling them searing, biting, horrible, gut-wrenching names like RIP
> > or ROOAR.
>
> LoL...stop whining.
Who's whining? I'm very concerned about your mental state, toopid. It
seems to be deteriorating at an alarming rate. While I didn't think
that was possible, there it is. Everybody can see it.
> A real starship trooper can take what he
> gives.
LOL! Don't worry, toopid. Your little acronyms are like a fly on the
windshield. Actually, more like a speck of fly **** on the windshield.
> > This even after I agreed with toopid that I never served,
>
> which makes you an admitted liar.....
No, I'm trying to help you through what must be some pretty tough times
for you. The state of your 'mind' has become even more confused
recently. Rather than get you into even more turmoil, I was told that
agreeing with your fanstasies might help. Apparently, you're too far
gone for that.
I'm worried about you.
> but I'm sure that doesn't bother you at all.
Why would trying to help you through your time of difficulty bother me?
ScottW
November 27th 06, 01:43 AM
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> ScottW wrote:
>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> > That would be the logic of somebody who has never served in the
>> > military, not even for one hour or fraction thereof, trying to make
>> > some obscure 'point' about somebody who retired from military service
>> > by calling them searing, biting, horrible, gut-wrenching names like RIP
>> > or ROOAR.
>>
>> LoL...stop whining.
>
> Who's whining?
Why you are dear.
>I'm very concerned about your mental state,
About to pull a Morein? LoL.
> toopid. It
> seems to be deteriorating at an alarming rate. While I didn't think
> that was possible, there it is. Everybody can see it.
>
>> A real starship trooper can take what he
>> gives.
>
> LOL! Don't worry, toopid. Your little acronyms are like a fly on the
> windshield. Actually, more like a speck of fly **** on the windshield.
So that explains this ridiculous thread of yours.
>
>> > This even after I agreed with toopid that I never served,
>>
>> which makes you an admitted liar.....
>
> No, I'm trying to help you through what must be some pretty tough times
> for you. The state of your 'mind' has become even more confused
> recently. Rather than get you into even more turmoil, I was told that
> agreeing with your fanstasies might help. Apparently, you're too far
> gone for that.
>
> I'm worried about you.
So much BS in so few words. Bravo.
>
>> but I'm sure that doesn't bother you at all.
>
> Why would trying to help you through your time of difficulty bother me?
Splitting sentences now? Wow...that is desperate...and feeble.
ScottW
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
November 27th 06, 02:31 AM
toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
ScottW wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >
> > ScottW wrote:
> >> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
> >> oups.com...
> >> > That would be the logic of somebody who has never served in the
> >> > military, not even for one hour or fraction thereof, trying to make
> >> > some obscure 'point' about somebody who retired from military service
> >> > by calling them searing, biting, horrible, gut-wrenching names like RIP
> >> > or ROOAR.
> >>
> >> LoL...stop whining.
> >
> > Who's whining?
>
> Why you are dear.
Not at all, dear. I'm trying to understand the 'logic' in your 'mind'
out of a state of concern for your stability.
> >I'm very concerned about your mental state,
See?
> About to pull a Morein? LoL.
Is he wrroied about your mental state, too?
> > toopid. It
> > seems to be deteriorating at an alarming rate. While I didn't think
> > that was possible, there it is. Everybody can see it.
> >
> >> A real starship trooper can take what he
> >> gives.
> >
> > LOL! Don't worry, toopid. Your little acronyms are like a fly on the
> > windshield. Actually, more like a speck of fly **** on the windshield.
>
> So that explains this ridiculous thread of yours.
So you agree the 'logic' of your comments is suspect.
There is progress!
> >> > This even after I agreed with toopid that I never served,
> >>
> >> which makes you an admitted liar.....
> >
> > No, I'm trying to help you through what must be some pretty tough times
> > for you. The state of your 'mind' has become even more confused
> > recently. Rather than get you into even more turmoil, I was told that
> > agreeing with your fanstasies might help. Apparently, you're too far
> > gone for that.
> >
> > I'm worried about you.
>
> So much BS in so few words. Bravo.
Why else would you have such a problem admitting that I have served?
LOL!
> >> but I'm sure that doesn't bother you at all.
> >
> > Why would trying to help you through your time of difficulty bother me?
>
> Splitting sentences now?
Watch this:
> Wow...that is desperate...and feeble.
That's some sentence there, toopid.
I'm not a grammatical critic, toopid, but if you want to be you might
try writing using accepted conventions.
LOL!
Moron.
ScottW
November 27th 06, 03:07 AM
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
Yawn.....do you really have nothing better to do?
Is anyone concerned for your obvious lack of a life?
Apparently not to both counts.
Oh well, I'm sure you'll find time to throw some more boring
stupid crap out here.
But before you do...could you kindly mark it OT?
Someone, somewhere just might have figured out how
to create a BS filter. You should at least have the decency
of helping them out.
ScottW
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
November 27th 06, 05:28 AM
Hello, groupie, having a nice night?;-)
ScottW wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> > toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
>
> Yawn.....do you really have nothing better to do?
>
> Is anyone concerned for your obvious lack of a life?
>
> Apparently not to both counts.
As I've said before, toopid, I really don't care if you respond ot not.
But since you can't seem to help yourself...
....irony noted.;-)
> Oh well, I'm sure you'll find time to throw some more boring
> stupid crap out here.
> But before you do...could you kindly mark it OT?
> Someone, somewhere just might have figured out how
> to create a BS filter. You should at least have the decency
> of helping them out.
Ah, they'll figure it out.
They're probably smarter than you are.
LOL!
Moron.
Arny Krueger
November 27th 06, 05:36 PM
"ScottW" > wrote in message
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> wrote in message
> oups.com...
>> toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
>
> Yawn.....do you really have nothing better to do?
>
> Is anyone concerned for your obvious lack of a life?
>
> Apparently not to both counts.
>
> Oh well, I'm sure you'll find time to throw some more
> boring stupid crap out here.
> But before you do...could you kindly mark it OT?
> Someone, somewhere just might have figured out how
> to create a BS filter. You should at least have the
> decency of helping them out.
Come on Scott! If you stopped being Johnny-on-the-spot with your many
replies to ****R, he might get bored and just go away.
Jenn
November 27th 06, 05:41 PM
In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> > wrote in message
> > oups.com...
> >> toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
> >
> > Yawn.....do you really have nothing better to do?
> >
> > Is anyone concerned for your obvious lack of a life?
> >
> > Apparently not to both counts.
> >
> > Oh well, I'm sure you'll find time to throw some more
> > boring stupid crap out here.
> > But before you do...could you kindly mark it OT?
> > Someone, somewhere just might have figured out how
> > to create a BS filter. You should at least have the
> > decency of helping them out.
>
> Come on Scott! If you stopped being Johnny-on-the-spot with your many
> replies to ****R, he might get bored and just go away.
But you don't seem to think that this would work with you and George.
Arny Krueger
November 27th 06, 05:48 PM
"Jenn" > wrote in
message
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>>
>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>>> > wrote in message
>>> oups.com...
>>>> toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
>>>
>>> Yawn.....do you really have nothing better to do?
>>>
>>> Is anyone concerned for your obvious lack of a life?
>>>
>>> Apparently not to both counts.
>>>
>>> Oh well, I'm sure you'll find time to throw some more
>>> boring stupid crap out here.
>>> But before you do...could you kindly mark it OT?
>>> Someone, somewhere just might have figured out how
>>> to create a BS filter. You should at least have the
>>> decency of helping them out.
>>
>> Come on Scott! If you stopped being Johnny-on-the-spot
>> with your many replies to ****R, he might get bored and
>> just go away.
>
> But you don't seem to think that this would work with you
> and George.
First off, check how many times George attacks me, and how often I respond,
say over the past month. Post the ratio as a fraction. Observe how small it
is compared to the same fraction for Scotty. In short Jenn, you have no
sense of proportion or fairness.
Secondly, history shows that George is exceptionally incorrigible. That is
a proven fact over close to a decade by now. I believe that I've illustrated
this point with many examples from the past.
I thus observe that in addition to your problem with fairness and
proportion, you have a serious problem with learning from history.
Jenn
November 27th 06, 06:08 PM
In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in
> message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> >>> > wrote in message
> >>> oups.com...
> >>>> toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
> >>>
> >>> Yawn.....do you really have nothing better to do?
> >>>
> >>> Is anyone concerned for your obvious lack of a life?
> >>>
> >>> Apparently not to both counts.
> >>>
> >>> Oh well, I'm sure you'll find time to throw some more
> >>> boring stupid crap out here.
> >>> But before you do...could you kindly mark it OT?
> >>> Someone, somewhere just might have figured out how
> >>> to create a BS filter. You should at least have the
> >>> decency of helping them out.
> >>
> >> Come on Scott! If you stopped being Johnny-on-the-spot
> >> with your many replies to ****R, he might get bored and
> >> just go away.
> >
> > But you don't seem to think that this would work with you
> > and George.
>
> First off, check how many times George attacks me, and how often I respond,
> say over the past month. Post the ratio as a fraction. Observe how small it
> is compared to the same fraction for Scotty. In short Jenn, you have no
> sense of proportion or fairness.
>
> Secondly, history shows that George is exceptionally incorrigible. That is
> a proven fact over close to a decade by now. I believe that I've illustrated
> this point with many examples from the past.
>
> I thus observe that in addition to your problem with fairness and
> proportion, you have a serious problem with learning from history.
lol I don't really care, Arny, other than how it shows that you don't
subscribe to goose/gander. That's your choice, of course.
Arny Krueger
November 27th 06, 06:10 PM
"Jenn" > wrote in
message
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>> message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>> oups.com...
>>>>>> toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yawn.....do you really have nothing better to do?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anyone concerned for your obvious lack of a life?
>>>>>
>>>>> Apparently not to both counts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh well, I'm sure you'll find time to throw some more
>>>>> boring stupid crap out here.
>>>>> But before you do...could you kindly mark it OT?
>>>>> Someone, somewhere just might have figured out how
>>>>> to create a BS filter. You should at least have the
>>>>> decency of helping them out.
>>>>
>>>> Come on Scott! If you stopped being Johnny-on-the-spot
>>>> with your many replies to ****R, he might get bored and
>>>> just go away.
>>>
>>> But you don't seem to think that this would work with
>>> you and George.
>>
>> First off, check how many times George attacks me, and
>> how often I respond, say over the past month. Post the
>> ratio as a fraction. Observe how small it is compared to
>> the same fraction for Scotty. In short Jenn, you have no
>> sense of proportion or fairness.
>>
>> Secondly, history shows that George is exceptionally
>> incorrigible. That is a proven fact over close to a
>> decade by now. I believe that I've illustrated this
>> point with many examples from the past.
>>
>> I thus observe that in addition to your problem with
>> fairness and proportion, you have a serious problem with
>> learning from history.
>
> lol I don't really care, Arny, other than how it shows
> that you don't subscribe to goose/gander.
Not at all Jenn. Since you've now declined to put your claims to a simple
unbiased test, it should be obvious to all that you're just trolling for
abuse.
Jenn
November 27th 06, 06:32 PM
In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in
> message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >> message
> >> .
> >> com
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> >>>>> > wrote in message
> >>>>> oups.com...
> >>>>>> toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yawn.....do you really have nothing better to do?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is anyone concerned for your obvious lack of a life?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Apparently not to both counts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Oh well, I'm sure you'll find time to throw some more
> >>>>> boring stupid crap out here.
> >>>>> But before you do...could you kindly mark it OT?
> >>>>> Someone, somewhere just might have figured out how
> >>>>> to create a BS filter. You should at least have the
> >>>>> decency of helping them out.
> >>>>
> >>>> Come on Scott! If you stopped being Johnny-on-the-spot
> >>>> with your many replies to ****R, he might get bored and
> >>>> just go away.
> >>>
> >>> But you don't seem to think that this would work with
> >>> you and George.
> >>
> >> First off, check how many times George attacks me, and
> >> how often I respond, say over the past month. Post the
> >> ratio as a fraction. Observe how small it is compared to
> >> the same fraction for Scotty. In short Jenn, you have no
> >> sense of proportion or fairness.
> >>
> >> Secondly, history shows that George is exceptionally
> >> incorrigible. That is a proven fact over close to a
> >> decade by now. I believe that I've illustrated this
> >> point with many examples from the past.
> >>
> >> I thus observe that in addition to your problem with
> >> fairness and proportion, you have a serious problem with
> >> learning from history.
> >
> > lol I don't really care, Arny, other than how it shows
> > that you don't subscribe to goose/gander.
>
> Not at all Jenn. Since you've now declined to put your claims to a simple
> unbiased test, it should be obvious to all that you're just trolling for
> abuse.
lol Projection noted. More goose/gander.
George M. Middius
November 27th 06, 06:53 PM
The Krooborg still demands we all let it be king of its "hill".
> Come on Scott! If you stopped being Johnny-on-the-spot
Don't worry, Arnii -- you'll never go hungry in this beautiful world of ours.
--
Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.
George M. Middius
November 27th 06, 06:53 PM
Jenn said:
> But you don't seem to think that this would work with you and George.
Thank's Jnen for admitting Jinn that you can not-stop obsessing about, me all
the time Jeen.
--
Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
November 27th 06, 06:54 PM
Arny Krueger wrote:
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> > wrote in message
> > oups.com...
> >> toopid goes through mental contortions to look sane:
> >
> > Yawn.....do you really have nothing better to do?
> >
> > Is anyone concerned for your obvious lack of a life?
> >
> > Apparently not to both counts.
> >
> > Oh well, I'm sure you'll find time to throw some more
> > boring stupid crap out here.
> > But before you do...could you kindly mark it OT?
> > Someone, somewhere just might have figured out how
> > to create a BS filter. You should at least have the
> > decency of helping them out.
>
> Come on Scott! If you stopped being Johnny-on-the-spot with your many
> replies to ****R, he might get bored and just go away.
LOL! Arns gives toopid lessons on how to behave.
Won't work, Arns.
The menagerie on RAO is too interesting. The flawed 'logic' is too fun
to pick apart. Take, for example, "Here in Ohio's" disappearance on
this question. Maybe you can give it a go:
******************************************
> Here in Ohio wrote:
> > Actually, some of this expensive audio gear _is_ superior. It's much
> > better at separating the gullible from their money than more rational
> > gear is. :-)
> I would suggest posting a FAQ on which amplifiers, preamps, cables,
> tuners, CD players, speakers, and so on, are 'rip-offs.' Wouldn't that
> be more helpful than, say, Arns' approach? Then any time somebody said,
> "I love my Atmosphere OTL amps!" you could post your FAQ on why tubes
> suck and how there are better values.
> Rationality is your definition. Expensive is your definition. And those
> definitions may not agree with someone else's definition.
> In fact, your definition of 'good-sounding audio' does not match
> everybody's. Some people are after absolute accuracy to the original
> recording. Some are after a more 'live' sound. The path to those two
> will probably not be the same.
> So now it's your turn: please rationally explain why what somebody else
> chooses to do, or how somebody spends their money, which literally has
> absolutely *no* affect on you, is your business.
************************************************** **
I want to understand your 'logic' as much as I want to understand
toopid's. But I expect you'll disappear just like HiO has, as there
clearly is not a logically valid response.;-)
And take you, for example. Like toopid, you're too stupid to see when
your ass has been handed to you. Unlike toopid, who *only* suffers from
a severe IQ deficit, you're an insane asshole.
Why would I leave when you're still here? This is way too much fun.
We'll put you in the "have to read Shhhh!'s posts" category, right
there beside toopid. Two peas in a pod, so to speak.
;-)
________________________________________
Arns Krueger (n. Vulgar): an insane asshole who is addicted to
harassing Normal people's preferences on the Usenet
George M. Middius
November 27th 06, 06:57 PM
The Krooborg is lost in the dense miasma of its own intense ****fulness.
> First off, check how many times George attacks me, and how often I respond,
> say over the past month. Post the ratio as a fraction. Observe how small it
> is compared to the same fraction for Scotty. In short Jenn, you have no
> sense of proportion or fairness.
I almost heard the violins that time. How many watts does your ampliwhiner
have, Arnii?
> Secondly, history shows that George is exceptionally incorrigible. That is
> a proven fact over close to a decade by now. I believe that I've illustrated
> this point with many examples from the past.
Let's talk about illustrations. You've convinced everybody -- and I do mean
EVERYbody -- that you're insane. An infinite plethora of Kroofulness can't
crowd that picture. It's absolutely, positively, super-duper crystal clear,
KrazyBorg.
--
Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
November 27th 06, 07:56 PM
Jenn just doesn't 'get it.'
Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > But you don't seem to think that this would work with you
> > and George.
>
> First off, check how many times George attacks me, and how often I respond,
> say over the past month. Post the ratio as a fraction. Observe how small it
> is compared to the same fraction for Scotty. In short Jenn, you have no
> sense of proportion or fairness.
Example: If Arns poops on your doorstep twelve times per month, and
toopid poops on your doorstep 48 times per month, can't you see the
morally-superior position that Arns holds?
> Secondly, history shows that George is exceptionally incorrigible. That is
> a proven fact over close to a decade by now. I believe that I've illustrated
> this point with many examples from the past.
Whereas Arns is totally, 100% corrigible. As dozens of posters have
illustrated, with thousands of examples, from the past. Can't you see
the morally-superior position that Arns holds?
> I thus observe that in addition to your problem with fairness and
> proportion, you have a serious problem with learning from history.
Example: Arns is not the problem. *You* are. Can't you see the
morally-superior position that Arns holds?
LOL!
________________________________________
Arns Krueger (n. Vulgar): an insane asshole who is addicted to
harassing Normal people's preferences on the Usenet
Arny Krueger
November 27th 06, 09:02 PM
"Jenn" > wrote in
message
Congratuations Jenn for creating a useless interchange of 6 posts by poking
your nose into NOYB, and then obtaining 6 additional pity posts (no doubt
more to follow!) from the other members of your team. You make RAO what it
is today.
George M. Middius
November 27th 06, 09:35 PM
The Krooborg wants its mommyborg.
> Jenn
Jenn is not your mommyborg, Mr. ****. Your fear and loathing of Jenn are
entirely misplaced.
--
Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.
ScottW
November 27th 06, 09:48 PM
Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in
> message
>
>
> Congratuations Jenn for creating a useless interchange of 6 posts by poking
> your nose into NOYB, and then obtaining 6 additional pity posts (no doubt
> more to follow!) from the other members of your team. You make RAO what it
> is today.
Yeah Arny, maybe if you didn't reply to each post she would get bored
with you! :).
ScottW
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
November 27th 06, 10:22 PM
Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> Congratuations Jenn for creating a useless interchange of 6 posts by poking
> your nose into NOYB,
When the nose that poked into an exchange between me and toopid was
YOB. LOL!
> and then obtaining 6 additional pity posts (no doubt
> more to follow!) from the other members of your team. You make RAO what it
> is today.
Thank <insert diety of choice. Perhaps your "X"?> that you are here,
Arns, having no impact on RAO and just being your good, old self.;-)
________________________________________
Arns Krueger (n. Vulgar): an insane asshole who is addicted to
harassing Normal people's preferences on the Usenet
Jenn
November 28th 06, 12:46 AM
In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in
> message
>
>
> Congratuations Jenn for creating a useless interchange of 6 posts by poking
> your nose into NOYB,
Which is EXACTLY what YOU did in the first place!
> and then obtaining
lol
> 6 additional pity posts (no doubt
> more to follow!) from the other members of your team. You make RAO what it
> is today.
lol You're cracking me up.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.