speakers and amp.

[[email protected]]

I would like to buy some nice stereo speakers and amplifier that would
be connected to sound card.
I've got about 500 euros for both, could you please recommend me any?
They would be used in a living room for listening audio CD in computer.
I don't need high power, just good quality..

[Eeyore]

wrote:

> I would like to buy some nice stereo speakers and amplifier that would
> be connected to sound card.
> I've got about 500 euros for both, could you please recommend me any?
> They would be used in a living room for listening audio CD in computer.
> I don't need high power, just good quality..

First thing. At this level you should be spending more on the speakers than
the amplifier. Amplifiers are relatively easy to design and will perform
well without excessive expenditure.

Speaker design however is rather more of an 'art' still or actually in fact
rather more of an esoteric science.

I'd suggest you think more like 300 for the amp and 700 for the speakers.

Your money will be wasted if you don't have a decent computer sound card
though. What is it ?

Graham

[Bertie the Bunyip]

Eeyore > wrote in
:

>
>
> wrote:
>
>> I would like to buy some nice stereo speakers and amplifier that
>> would be connected to sound card.
>> I've got about 500 euros for both, could you please recommend me any?
>> They would be used in a living room for listening audio CD in
>> computer. I don't need high power, just good quality..
>
> First thing. At this level you should be spending more on the speakers
> than the amplifier. Amplifiers are relatively easy to design and will
> perform well without excessive expenditure.
>
> Speaker design however is rather more of an 'art' still or actually in
> fact rather more of an esoteric science.
>
> I'd suggest you think more like 300 for the amp and 700 for the
> speakers.
>
> Your money will be wasted if you don't have a decent computer sound
> card though. What is it ?
>
> Graham
>


Fjukkkkwit nettttkoopppp.




bertie

[paul packer]

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:33:43 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> wrote:

>Eeyore > wrote in
:
>
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to buy some nice stereo speakers and amplifier that
>>> would be connected to sound card.
>>> I've got about 500 euros for both, could you please recommend me any?
>>> They would be used in a living room for listening audio CD in
>>> computer. I don't need high power, just good quality..
>>
>> First thing. At this level you should be spending more on the speakers
>> than the amplifier. Amplifiers are relatively easy to design and will
>> perform well without excessive expenditure.
>>
>> Speaker design however is rather more of an 'art' still or actually in
>> fact rather more of an esoteric science.
>>
>> I'd suggest you think more like 300 for the amp and 700 for the
>> speakers.
>>
>> Your money will be wasted if you don't have a decent computer sound
>> card though. What is it ?
>>
>> Graham
>>
>
>
>Fjukkkkwit nettttkoopppp.


Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.

[Eeyore]

paul packer wrote:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >Eeyore > wrote in
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would like to buy some nice stereo speakers and amplifier that
> >>> would be connected to sound card.
> >>> I've got about 500 euros for both, could you please recommend me any?
> >>> They would be used in a living room for listening audio CD in
> >>> computer. I don't need high power, just good quality..
> >>
> >> First thing. At this level you should be spending more on the speakers
> >> than the amplifier. Amplifiers are relatively easy to design and will
> >> perform well without excessive expenditure.
> >>
> >> Speaker design however is rather more of an 'art' still or actually in
> >> fact rather more of an esoteric science.
> >>
> >> I'd suggest you think more like 300 for the amp and 700 for the
> >> speakers.
> >>
> >> Your money will be wasted if you don't have a decent computer sound
> >> card though. What is it ?
> >>
> >> Graham
> >
> >
> >Fjukkkkwit nettttkoopppp.
>
> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.

Bertie wouldn't do that.

He's simply here to try to harass me.

Graham

[Bertie the Bunyip]

(paul packer) wrote in news:45318d8f.2832875
@news.iprimus.com.au:

> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:33:43 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> > wrote:
>
>>Eeyore > wrote in
:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would like to buy some nice stereo speakers and amplifier that
>>>> would be connected to sound card.
>>>> I've got about 500 euros for both, could you please recommend me
any?
>>>> They would be used in a living room for listening audio CD in
>>>> computer. I don't need high power, just good quality..
>>>
>>> First thing. At this level you should be spending more on the
speakers
>>> than the amplifier. Amplifiers are relatively easy to design and
will
>>> perform well without excessive expenditure.
>>>
>>> Speaker design however is rather more of an 'art' still or actually
in
>>> fact rather more of an esoteric science.
>>>
>>> I'd suggest you think more like 300 for the amp and 700 for the
>>> speakers.
>>>
>>> Your money will be wasted if you don't have a decent computer sound
>>> card though. What is it ?
>>>
>>> Graham
>>>
>>
>>
>>Fjukkkkwit nettttkoopppp.
>
>
> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.


How do you reckon that?


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip]

Eeyore > wrote in
:

>
>
> paul packer wrote:
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >Eeyore > wrote in
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I would like to buy some nice stereo speakers and amplifier that
>> >>> would be connected to sound card.
>> >>> I've got about 500 euros for both, could you please recommend me
>> >>> any? They would be used in a living room for listening audio CD
>> >>> in computer. I don't need high power, just good quality..
>> >>
>> >> First thing. At this level you should be spending more on the
>> >> speakers than the amplifier. Amplifiers are relatively easy to
>> >> design and will perform well without excessive expenditure.
>> >>
>> >> Speaker design however is rather more of an 'art' still or
>> >> actually in fact rather more of an esoteric science.
>> >>
>> >> I'd suggest you think more like 300 for the amp and 700 for the
>> >> speakers.
>> >>
>> >> Your money will be wasted if you don't have a decent computer
>> >> sound card though. What is it ?
>> >>
>> >> Graham
>> >
>> >
>> >Fjukkkkwit nettttkoopppp.
>>
>> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.
>
> Bertie wouldn't do that.
>
> He's simply here to try to harass me.


Moi? Surely you jest.


I'm surprised you're up today after beating all those women off last
night.

Well, beating something off....



Wannabe netttkkkop.



Bertie

[[email protected]]

oki, the sound card at the moment is poor ac97, but I will replace it
with 'Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme' before bying speakers. I don't need
surround, but it would be nice if that is optional.
BTW, I plan on listening to mostly pop music if that matters..
There are so many models and price range is huge. I don't want to
spend too much money on something marginally better or something I
don't need.

[[email protected]]

oh, and 1000 eur is too much; my hearing is probably not that good
anyway ;)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

paul packer wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> > wrote:
>
>
> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.
> >
> >
> >How do you reckon that?

> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
> are otherwise

It's art, or so I'm told.

[paul packer]

On 16 Oct 2006 04:08:41 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:

>
>paul packer wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.
>> >
>> >
>> >How do you reckon that?
>
>> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
>> are otherwise
>
>It's art, or so I'm told.

Do you mean art or Art?

[Bill Riel]

In article >,
says...
> On 16 Oct 2006 04:08:41 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >paul packer wrote:
> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >How do you reckon that?
> >
> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
> >> are otherwise
> >
> >It's art, or so I'm told.
>
> Do you mean art or Art?

Well it can't be Art - Bertie only requires one post for his one-liners.

Not to mention that Art is usually pretty funny. Bertie wound up in my
killfile after about 3 of his inane posts.

--
Bill

[Bertie the Bunyip]

(paul packer) wrote in news:4532e5cf.1509296
@news.iprimus.com.au:

> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> > wrote:
>
>
>>> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.
>>
>>
>>How do you reckon that?
>>
>>
>>Bertie
>
>
> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
> are otherwise
>

Nope, just talking over your head.




Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
ps.com:

>
> paul packer wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
helpful.
>> >
>> >
>> >How do you reckon that?
>
>> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
>> are otherwise
>
> It's art, or so I'm told.
>

And it's not finished yet!

Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?

Or not,


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip]

(paul packer) wrote in news:45336f40.36693859
@news.iprimus.com.au:

> On 16 Oct 2006 04:08:41 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>paul packer wrote:
>>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
helpful.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >How do you reckon that?
>>
>>> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
>>> are otherwise
>>
>>It's art, or so I'm told.
>
> Do you mean art or Art?
>


Irreeeelllleeevantt.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip]

Bill Riel > wrote in
t:

> In article >,
> says...
>> On 16 Oct 2006 04:08:41 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >paul packer wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
>> >> >> helpful.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >How do you reckon that?
>> >
>> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which
>> >> you are otherwise
>> >
>> >It's art, or so I'm told.
>>
>> Do you mean art or Art?
>
> Well it can't be Art - Bertie only requires one post for his
> one-liners.
>
> Not to mention that Art is usually pretty funny. Bertie wound up in my
> killfile after about 3 of his inane posts.
>

Awww, I'm hurt

Bertie

[The One]

paul packer wrote:
> On 16 Oct 2006 04:08:41 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >paul packer wrote:
> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >How do you reckon that?
> >
> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
> >> are otherwise
> >
> >It's art, or so I'm told.
>
> Do you mean art or Art?

I asked this bertie character why all he could do is write "fjukkwit"
when there are so many juicy insults floating around. He replied that I
do not understand art.

Speaking of Art, I was glad to see him back. I was wondering what had
happened to him.

[Bertie the Bunyip]

"The One" > wrote in
oups.com:

>
> paul packer wrote:
>> On 16 Oct 2006 04:08:41 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >paul packer wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
>> >> >> helpful.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >How do you reckon that?
>> >
>> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which
>> >> you are otherwise
>> >
>> >It's art, or so I'm told.
>>
>> Do you mean art or Art?
>
> I asked this bertie character why all he could do is write "fjukkwit"
> when there are so many juicy insults floating around. He replied that
> I do not understand art.
>

and you're refuting this?


Bertie

[paul packer]

On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:45:23 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> wrote:


>Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>
>Or not,

Probably better just to killfile you.

[Eeyore]

(paul packer) wrote in news:45342d38.1453546
@news.iprimus.com.au:

> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:45:23 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>>
>>Or not,
>
> Probably better just to killfile you.
>

Yeah, prolly best



Bertie

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
> ps.com:
>
> >
> > paul packer wrote:
> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
> helpful.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >How do you reckon that?
> >
> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
> >> are otherwise
> >
> > It's art, or so I'm told.
> >
>
> And it's not finished yet!
>
> Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>
> Or not,

Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.

Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
> ps.com:
>
> >
> > paul packer wrote:
> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
> helpful.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >How do you reckon that?
> >
> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
> >> are otherwise
> >
> > It's art, or so I'm told.
> >
>
> And it's not finished yet!
>
> Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>
> Or not,

Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.

Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
> ps.com:
>
> >
> > paul packer wrote:
> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
> helpful.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >How do you reckon that?
> >
> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
> >> are otherwise
> >
> > It's art, or so I'm told.
> >
>
> And it's not finished yet!
>
> Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>
> Or not,

Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.

Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!

[Bertie the Bunyip]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
ups.com:

>
> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
>> ps.com:
>>
>> >
>> > paul packer wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
>> helpful.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >How do you reckon that?
>> >
>> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which
you
>> >> are otherwise
>> >
>> > It's art, or so I'm told.
>> >
>>
>> And it's not finished yet!
>>
>> Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>>
>> Or not,
>
> Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
> are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.

Oh thank you.

>
> Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
> faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!

No prob. It's a bit like an imprssionist painting you can see only theh
individual brush strokes when it's inspected closely. You must stand
back to take in the full breadthh of it;s beauty.



Bertie


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
oups.com:

>
> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
>> ps.com:
>>
>> >
>> > paul packer wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
>> helpful.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >How do you reckon that?
>> >
>> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which
you
>> >> are otherwise
>> >
>> > It's art, or so I'm told.
>> >
>>
>> And it's not finished yet!
>>
>> Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>>
>> Or not,
>
> Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
> are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.
>
> Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
> faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!
>

And double posting!

This will help no end!


bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
ups.com:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
>> ps.com:
>>
>> >
>> > paul packer wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
>> helpful.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >How do you reckon that?
>> >
>> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which
you
>> >> are otherwise
>> >
>> > It's art, or so I'm told.
>> >
>>
>> And it's not finished yet!
>>
>> Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>>
>> Or not,
>
> Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
> are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.
>
> Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
> faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!
>

wow! maybe you do get this!


bertie

[Eeyore]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
> > ps.com:
> > > paul packer wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> > >> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
> > helpful.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >How do you reckon that?
> > >
> > >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
> > >> are otherwise
> > >
> > > It's art, or so I'm told.
> > >
> >
> > And it's not finished yet!
> >
> > Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
> >
> > Or not,
>
> Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
> are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.
>
> Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
> faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!

I'm missing so much.

The 4 posts previous to yours aren't even on this server.

Graham

[Eeyore]

wrote:

> oh, and 1000 eur is too much; my hearing is probably not that good
> anyway ;)

I assume you're not looking for an especially loud system ?

Graham

[Demon Lord of Confusion]

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:09:51 +0000, paul packer attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:45:23 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>
>>Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>>
>>Or not,
>
> Probably better just to killfile you.

Well, you could try that, I suppose. But then you'd just get other
kookologists quoting him in replies.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner > on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: om>

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
om

"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined to
describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of stoned
hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as throwing
money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then explaining to
reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil Ochs summed it
up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you off." So when
journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows, at best it's
careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization. Osama bin Laden
wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman merely wanted
to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner, http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

[Demon Lord of Confusion]

On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:47:02 -0700, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>> > paul packer wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
>> helpful.
>> >> >
>> >> >How do you reckon that?
>> >
>> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
>> >> are otherwise
>> >
>> > It's art, or so I'm told.
>>
>> And it's not finished yet!
>>
>> Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>>
>> Or not,
>
> Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
> are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.
>
> Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
> faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!

Keep k00king-out, it's funny!

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner > on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: om>

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
om

"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined to
describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of stoned
hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as throwing
money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then explaining to
reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil Ochs summed it
up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you off." So when
journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows, at best it's
careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization. Osama bin Laden
wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman merely wanted
to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner, http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

[Real Friendit Naybourhood Wote Monger]

"Demon Lord of Confusion" > wrote in message
used...
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:47:02 -0700, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>>> > paul packer wrote:
>>> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
>>> helpful.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >How do you reckon that?
>>> >
>>> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
>>> >> are otherwise
>>> >
>>> > It's art, or so I'm told.
>>>
>>> And it's not finished yet!
>>>
>>> Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>>>
>>> Or not,
>>
>> Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
>> are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.
>>
>> Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
>> faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!
>
> Keep k00king-out, it's funny!

Pet yourself on the back door bell? Now that's funny looking grin you had.

>
> --
> __________________________________________________ ______________________
> Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
> The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
> Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
>
> "Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
> A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.
>
> Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
> George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
> and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner > on
> outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
> "Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
> their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
> pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
> You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
> by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
> obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
> information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
> You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
> different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.
>
> "Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
> coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
> are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
> way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
> that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
> to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
> choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.
>
> "What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
> -- in MID: om>
>
> "I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
> Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
> om
>
> "When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
> since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
> combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
> Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined to
> describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of stoned
> hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as throwing
> money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then explaining to
> reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil Ochs summed it
> up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you off." So when
> journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows, at best it's
> careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization. Osama bin Laden
> wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman merely wanted
> to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner, http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

[Bertie the Bunyip]

Eeyore > wrote in
:

>
>
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
>> > ps.com:
>> > > paul packer wrote:
>> > >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more
>> > helpful.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >How do you reckon that?
>> > >
>> > >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which
>> > >> you are otherwise
>> > >
>> > > It's art, or so I'm told.
>> > >
>> >
>> > And it's not finished yet!
>> >
>> > Hold the critiques til the last brush stroke, eh?
>> >
>> > Or not,
>>
>> Here's the attention that you crave. You are indeed alive, unless you
>> are a bot with a severely limited vocabulary.
>>
>> Puhleeze do not keep us waiting! Get to that last brush stroke! Paint
>> faster, so that we can see your masterpiece!
>
> I'm missing so much.
>
> The 4 posts previous to yours aren't even on this server.

A luser server for a luser netkkkkop.



Bertei

[Bertie the Bunyip]

Eeyore > wrote in
:

>
>
> wrote:
>
>> oh, and 1000 eur is too much; my hearing is probably not that good
>> anyway ;)
>
> I assume you're not looking for an especially loud system ?
>
> Graham

Fjukkwit netkkkkop..


Bertie

[Post.Post.Colonial.Boy]

On 16 Oct 2006 15:57:02 -0700, "The One" >
wrote:

>
>paul packer wrote:
>> On 16 Oct 2006 04:08:41 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >paul packer wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >> Why don't you try responding to the OP? That would be more helpful.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >How do you reckon that?
>> >
>> >> Because presumably you'd be on-topic and lucid, neither of which you
>> >> are otherwise
>> >
>> >It's art, or so I'm told.
>>
>> Do you mean art or Art?

It's Fart.

PPCB

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----