oT : Scott silenced

[Mr Fox]

The last 5 propagandist messages initated by Scott.



Date: 18 Sep 2006
Subject: OT:Who's denying rights here?

Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006
Subject: OT: For Graham

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006
Subject: OT: Interesting Clip

Date: 27 Sep 2006
Subject: OT:Islamist on AJ

Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006
Subject: OT:Islamists at it Again




Where are the newer ones? Has Scott lost the power to squeak after
being squished by Shhh!, Fella and myself.

[paul packer]

On 6 Oct 2006 01:19:16 +0200, Mr Fox > wrote:

>
>The last 5 propagandist messages initated by Scott.
>
>
>
>Date: 18 Sep 2006
>Subject: OT:Who's denying rights here?
>
>Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006
>Subject: OT: For Graham
>
>Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006
>Subject: OT: Interesting Clip
>
>Date: 27 Sep 2006
>Subject: OT:Islamist on AJ
>
>Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006
>Subject: OT:Islamists at it Again
>
>
>
>
>Where are the newer ones? Has Scott lost the power to squeak after
>being squished by Shhh!, Fella and myself.

Please don't encourage him.

[ScottW]

"Mr Fox" > wrote in message
...
>
> The last 5 propagandist messages initated by Scott.
>
>
>
> Date: 18 Sep 2006
> Subject: OT:Who's denying rights here?
>
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006
> Subject: OT: For Graham
>
> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006
> Subject: OT: Interesting Clip
>
> Date: 27 Sep 2006
> Subject: OT:Islamist on AJ
>
> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006
> Subject: OT:Islamists at it Again
>
>
>
>
> Where are the newer ones? Has Scott lost the power to squeak after
> being squished by Shhh!, Fella and myself.

Sorry, I've been busy.....and you two ...I won't dump fella into your
inane category...aren't worthy.

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:
> "Mr Fox" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > The last 5 propagandist messages initated by Scott.
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: 18 Sep 2006
> > Subject: OT:Who's denying rights here?
> >
> > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006
> > Subject: OT: For Graham
> >
> > Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006
> > Subject: OT: Interesting Clip
> >
> > Date: 27 Sep 2006
> > Subject: OT:Islamist on AJ
> >
> > Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006
> > Subject: OT:Islamists at it Again
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Where are the newer ones? Has Scott lost the power to squeak after
> > being squished by Shhh!, Fella and myself.
>
> Sorry, I've been busy.....and you two ...I won't dump fella into your
> inane category...aren't worthy.

I'm sorry Mr. Fox... but...

You can't shut toopid up any more than you can stop a child from
screaming who has had their lollipop taken from them.

That's exactly how toopid's 'mind' works.

[Mr Fox]

On 6 Oct 2006 13:23:23 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:

>ScottW wrote:
>> "Mr Fox" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > The last 5 propagandist messages initated by Scott.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Date: 18 Sep 2006
>> > Subject: OT:Who's denying rights here?
>> >
>> > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006
>> > Subject: OT: For Graham
>> >
>> > Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006
>> > Subject: OT: Interesting Clip
>> >
>> > Date: 27 Sep 2006
>> > Subject: OT:Islamist on AJ
>> >
>> > Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006
>> > Subject: OT:Islamists at it Again
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Where are the newer ones? Has Scott lost the power to squeak after
>> > being squished by Shhh!, Fella and myself.
>>
>> Sorry, I've been busy.....and you two ...I won't dump fella into your
>> inane category...aren't worthy.
>
>I'm sorry Mr. Fox... but...
>
>You can't shut toopid up any more than you can stop a child from
>screaming who has had their lollipop taken from them.

LOL!

>That's exactly how toopid's 'mind' works.

I played ScottW; took just 3hrs to get him dancin'.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Mr Fox wrote:

> I played ScottW; took just 3hrs to get him dancin'.

You shouldn't have admitted that.

It's so entertaining to see the justifications for republican stupidity
that his 'mind' can produce.

[Mr Fox]

On 6 Oct 2006 14:21:08 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:

>
>Mr Fox wrote:
>
>> I played ScottW; took just 3hrs to get him dancin'.
>
>You shouldn't have admitted that.
>

It's for his own good;; wouldn't want him to get carried away with the
idea he's acting of his own volition.

>It's so entertaining to see the justifications for republican stupidity
>that his 'mind' can produce.


;)

[ScottW]

"Mr Fox" > wrote in message
...
> On 6 Oct 2006 14:21:08 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>Mr Fox wrote:
>>
>>> I played ScottW; took just 3hrs to get him dancin'.
>>
>>You shouldn't have admitted that.
>>
>
> It's for his own good;; wouldn't want him to get carried away with the
> idea he's acting of his own volition.

Jenn,

Should I try to engage this 'tard in civil discourse?
Sometimes the subject and the opponent just aren't worthy.

Meanwhile there are things worth discussing.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/05/wmuslims05.xml

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:
> "Mr Fox" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On 6 Oct 2006 14:21:08 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Mr Fox wrote:
> >>
> >>> I played ScottW; took just 3hrs to get him dancin'.
> >>
> >>You shouldn't have admitted that.
> >>
> >
> > It's for his own good;; wouldn't want him to get carried away with the
> > idea he's acting of his own volition.
>
> Jenn,
>
> Should I try to engage this 'tard in civil discourse?
> Sometimes the subject and the opponent just aren't worthy.

Jenn isn't worthy either. She has debated Arny for too long and now her
ethics and morals are suspect, at least to a certain Resident Genius on
RAO.

> Meanwhile there are things worth discussing.
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/05/wmuslims05.xml

I agree wholeheartedly.

Let's discuss this quote: "Senior officers insisted that the problem
was essentially criminal in nature, with crime bosses on the estates
fighting back against tough tactics."

And how this quote from the police union, "orchestrated by radical
Islamists" got transformed to this headline: "Muslims are waging civil
war against us, claims police union"

And then we can discuss why, in the vacuum of your 'mind,' you thought
it was important to post this article.

Moron.

[ScottW]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> ScottW wrote:
>> "Mr Fox" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On 6 Oct 2006 14:21:08 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>Mr Fox wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I played ScottW; took just 3hrs to get him dancin'.
>> >>
>> >>You shouldn't have admitted that.
>> >>
>> >
>> > It's for his own good;; wouldn't want him to get carried away with the
>> > idea he's acting of his own volition.
>>
>> Jenn,
>>
>> Should I try to engage this 'tard in civil discourse?
>> Sometimes the subject and the opponent just aren't worthy.
>
> Jenn isn't worthy either. She has debated Arny for too long and now her
> ethics and morals are suspect, at least to a certain Resident Genius on
> RAO.
>
>> Meanwhile there are things worth discussing.
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/05/wmuslims05.xml
>
> I agree wholeheartedly.
>
> Let's discuss this quote: "Senior officers insisted that the problem
> was essentially criminal in nature, with crime bosses on the estates
> fighting back against tough tactics."

Exactly when does a crime boss transition to a warlord?
I'd say when he rules territory.
Unfortunately the French are apparently having to
"retake territory" in their own country.
>
> And how this quote from the police union, "orchestrated by radical
> Islamists" got transformed to this headline: "Muslims are waging civil
> war against us, claims police union"

Are radical Islamists not Muslims?

>
> And then we can discuss why, in the vacuum of your 'mind,' you thought
> it was important to post this article.

You think an internal debate in the upcoming French election on
the existence of a French intifada is unimportant?
Time to return your head to the sands.

ScottW

[Mr Fox]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:01:44 -0700, "ScottW" >
wrote:

>> And how this quote from the police union, "orchestrated by radical
>> Islamists" got transformed to this headline: "Muslims are waging civil
>> war against us, claims police union"
>
> Are radical Islamists not Muslims?
>

This ScottW thing is so accustomed to lies and deceit it is unable to
function normally.

[Mr Fox]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:53:31 -0700, "ScottW" >
wrote:

>"Mr Fox" > wrote in message
...
>> On 6 Oct 2006 14:21:08 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Mr Fox wrote:
>>>
>>>> I played ScottW; took just 3hrs to get him dancin'.
>>>
>>>You shouldn't have admitted that.
>>>
>>
>> It's for his own good;; wouldn't want him to get carried away with the
>> idea he's acting of his own volition.
>
> Jenn,
>
> Should I try to engage this 'tard in civil discourse?

You ask for approval from Jenn.
How old are you, feeble one?



> Sometimes the subject and the opponent just aren't worthy.
>

Every time I challenged you on a pont you made, that point has been
completely destroyed'. That is because you dont really have a point to
make; excpept the _obvious_ one : "I am naive and stupid"

Sure', make your exccuses, give up ;)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:

> You think an internal debate in the upcoming French election on
> the existence of a French intifada is unimportant?
> Time to return your head to the sands.

Should we 'take out' anybody?

[ScottW]

"Mr Fox" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:53:31 -0700, "ScottW" >
> wrote:
>
>>"Mr Fox" > wrote in message
...
>>> On 6 Oct 2006 14:21:08 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Mr Fox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I played ScottW; took just 3hrs to get him dancin'.
>>>>
>>>>You shouldn't have admitted that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's for his own good;; wouldn't want him to get carried away with the
>>> idea he's acting of his own volition.
>>
>> Jenn,
>>
>> Should I try to engage this 'tard in civil discourse?
>
> You ask for approval from Jenn.
> How old are you, feeble one?
>
>
>
>> Sometimes the subject and the opponent just aren't worthy.
>>
>
> Every time I challenged you on a pont you made, that point has been
> completely destroyed'. That is because you dont really have a point to
> make; excpept the _obvious_ one : "I am naive and stupid"

Thanks for making proving my point....again.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> ScottW wrote:
>
>> You think an internal debate in the upcoming French election on
>> the existence of a French intifada is unimportant?
>> Time to return your head to the sands.
>
> Should we 'take out' anybody?

Is your scope of interest that limited?

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > ScottW wrote:
> >
> >> You think an internal debate in the upcoming French election on
> >> the existence of a French intifada is unimportant?
> >> Time to return your head to the sands.
> >
> > Should we 'take out' anybody?
>
> Is your scope of interest that limited?

Limited? That's what we do, toopid. I'm merely wondering if we have any
customers today.

Do tell me why you think that an internal debate in the upcoming French
election on
the existence of a French intifada is important enough to post about it
on an audio forum.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:

> Thanks for making proving my point....again.

LOL!

Do you even recall what you wrote to Jenn a couple of days ago?

Or was that truly the 'bad' toopid?

Moron.