View Full Version : Re: A must see. In his own words!
Wally Hooker
May 5th 04, 05:23 PM
Anti abortion people use shocking images all the time.
it's not propoganda, it's reality.
Wally
"BornToRun" > wrote in message
...
> That little child torn to pieces shocked me :'((
>
> I wonder how it's possible someone is so perverse
> to use such a dramatic harrowing picture
> to do some ****in' political propaganda!!!!!!!!
>
>
BornToRun
May 5th 04, 06:58 PM
If that picture had been shown into
kinda "Rescue the Innocent Children from
the Horror" site, you would be right!
"Wally Hooker" > ha scritto nel messaggio
> Anti abortion people use shocking images all the time.
>
> it's not propoganda, it's reality.
>
> Wally
>
>
> "BornToRun" > wrote in message
> ...
> > That little child torn to pieces shocked me :'((
> >
> > I wonder how it's possible someone is so perverse
> > to use such a dramatic harrowing picture
> > to do some ****in' political propaganda!!!!!!!!
> >
> >
>
>
bernard spilman
May 5th 04, 08:46 PM
> If that picture had been shown into
> kinda "Rescue the Innocent Children from
> the Horror" site, you would be right!
Getting Bush out of office will indeed "Rescue [many]
Innocent Children from [many] Horror[s]," American
children and others.
WS
BornToRun
May 6th 04, 12:33 AM
This could be a good move, indeed.
Ah, don't forget to dismiss dick-duck as well.
"bernard spilman" > ha scritto nel messaggio
> > If that picture had been shown into
> > kinda "Rescue the Innocent Children from
> > the Horror" site, you would be right!
>
> Getting Bush out of office will indeed "Rescue [many]
> Innocent Children from [many] Horror[s]," American
> children and others.
> WS
>
>
In article >, Kurt Albershardt > wrote:
>KathyJ wrote:
>>
>> The only consolation here is the anticipation of checking out this
>> group come November, after Bush has beaten that stiff Kerry like a
>> rented mule.
>
>Mules, like Donkeys can be quite dangerous
> http://www.onzin.nl/3991/video/donkey.mpg
>
OK, now that was DAMN FUNNY!!!!!
WTF was that european guy thinking?
Looked to me like he was trying to give the shlong to the mule but in the
"end" , the mule shlonged him!!!!
In article >, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>Bill Thompson wrote:
>
>> I had not thought about it that way before... but the really scary
>> thing is I'm thinking a grid-locked federal government has some
>> appeal!
>
>
>Hold that thought.
>
>BTW, gridlock pretty describes most of the Clinton years. Results? Lotsa
>growth juat happened to occur during that time. Not that the gov't was
>responsible for all of it.
It was false growth. It was the false economy of the booming internet, the
false criminal energy economy and accounting practices that finally came to
light. It was during those Clinton years that all this activity was taking
place. After all, if Clinton could lie under oath , why not them.
>
>Other result - lotsa of regulation failures, so gridlock is not the ideal
>long-term solution.
>
>
Kurt Albershardt
May 7th 04, 06:16 AM
GMAN wrote:
> In article >, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> Bill Thompson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I had not thought about it that way before... but the really scary
>>> thing is I'm thinking a grid-locked federal government has some
>>> appeal!
>>
>>
>> Hold that thought.
>>
>> BTW, gridlock pretty describes most of the Clinton years. Results? Lotsa
>> growth juat happened to occur during that time. Not that the gov't was
>> responsible for all of it.
>
>
> It was false growth. It was the false economy of the booming internet, the
> false criminal energy economy and accounting practices that finally came to
> light. It was during those Clinton years that all this activity was taking
> place. After all, if Clinton could lie under oath , why not them.
To quote a recent bupersticker:
When Clinton lied, nobody died.
Kurt Albershardt
May 7th 04, 06:16 AM
GMAN wrote:
> In article >, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> Bill Thompson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I had not thought about it that way before... but the really scary
>>> thing is I'm thinking a grid-locked federal government has some
>>> appeal!
>>
>>
>> Hold that thought.
>>
>> BTW, gridlock pretty describes most of the Clinton years. Results? Lotsa
>> growth juat happened to occur during that time. Not that the gov't was
>> responsible for all of it.
>
>
> It was false growth. It was the false economy of the booming internet, the
> false criminal energy economy and accounting practices that finally came to
> light. It was during those Clinton years that all this activity was taking
> place. After all, if Clinton could lie under oath , why not them.
To quote a recent bumpersticker:
When Clinton lied, nobody died.
"Kurt Albershardt" > wrote in message
...
> GMAN wrote:
>
> > In article >, "Arny Krueger"
> wrote:
> >
> >> Bill Thompson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I had not thought about it that way before... but the really scary
> >>> thing is I'm thinking a grid-locked federal government has some
> >>> appeal!
> >>
> >>
> >> Hold that thought.
> >>
> >> BTW, gridlock pretty describes most of the Clinton years. Results?
Lotsa
> >> growth juat happened to occur during that time. Not that the gov't was
> >> responsible for all of it.
> >
> >
> > It was false growth. It was the false economy of the booming internet,
the
> > false criminal energy economy and accounting practices that finally
came to
> > light. It was during those Clinton years that all this activity was
taking
> > place. After all, if Clinton could lie under oath , why not them.
>
>
> To quote a recent bumpersticker:
>
> When Clinton lied, nobody died.
Really? So, I guess Vince Foster & Mogadishu don't immediately come to
mind?
--
Neil Henderson
Progressive Rock
http://www.saqqararecords.com
Michael McKelvy
May 7th 04, 06:44 PM
"Kurt Albershardt" > wrote in message
...
> GMAN wrote:
> > In article >, "Arny Krueger"
> wrote:
> >
> >> Bill Thompson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I had not thought about it that way before... but the really scary
> >>> thing is I'm thinking a grid-locked federal government has some
> >>> appeal!
> >>
> >>
> >> Hold that thought.
> >>
> >> BTW, gridlock pretty describes most of the Clinton years. Results?
Lotsa
> >> growth juat happened to occur during that time. Not that the gov't was
> >> responsible for all of it.
> >
> >
> > It was false growth. It was the false economy of the booming internet,
the
> > false criminal energy economy and accounting practices that finally came
to
> > light. It was during those Clinton years that all this activity was
taking
> > place. After all, if Clinton could lie under oath , why not them.
>
> To quote a recent bupersticker:
>
> When Clinton lied, nobody died.
>
>
Black Hawk Down.
Kurt Albershardt
May 7th 04, 06:59 PM
Michael McKelvy wrote:
> "Kurt Albershardt" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> GMAN wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It was false growth. It was the false economy of the booming internet,
>>> the false criminal energy economy and accounting practices that
>>> finally came to light. It was during those Clinton years that all
>>> this activity was taking place. After all, if Clinton could lie under
>>> oath , why not them.
>>
>> To quote a recent bumpersticker:
>> When Clinton lied, nobody died.
>
> Black Hawk Down.
Which has exactly what to do with lying about a blowjob?
Michael McKelvy
May 7th 04, 10:50 PM
"Kurt Albershardt" > wrote in message
...
> Michael McKelvy wrote:
> > "Kurt Albershardt" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >> GMAN wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It was false growth. It was the false economy of the booming internet,
> >>> the false criminal energy economy and accounting practices that
> >>> finally came to light. It was during those Clinton years that all
> >>> this activity was taking place. After all, if Clinton could lie under
> >>> oath , why not them.
> >>
> >> To quote a recent bumpersticker:
> >> When Clinton lied, nobody died.
> >
> > Black Hawk Down.
>
> Which has exactly what to do with lying about a blowjob?
>
>
As much as your claim that Bush lied has to do with somebody dying.
I do recall that Clinton's reason for going to Mogadishu was to have our
military fight for human rights there. Seems if it gets tough, his words
don't mean much.
STOP BUSH NOW
May 8th 04, 12:00 AM
"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message could lie under oath , why not them.
> >
> > To quote a recent bupersticker:
> >
> > When Clinton lied, nobody died.
> >
> >
> Black Hawk Down.
Man, talk about desperate.
At least you could bring up Oklahoma City. Oh wait, that was a
repugnant that hated Clinton too.
"STOP BUSH NOW" > wrote in message
om...
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message could lie
under oath , why not them.
> > >
> > > To quote a recent bupersticker:
> > >
> > > When Clinton lied, nobody died.
> > >
> > >
> > Black Hawk Down.
>
>
> Man, talk about desperate.
>
> At least you could bring up Oklahoma City. Oh wait, that was a
> repugnant that hated Clinton too.
You call *him* desperate & then you equate McVeigh as representing
Republicans in general? At least you could bring up Ruby Ridge or Waco. Oh,
but nobody died in those incidents - which were presided over by the
Clinton administraton - either, I suppose?
--
Neil Henderson
Progressive Rock
http://www.saqqararecords.com
"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> > said:
>
> > > At least you could bring up Oklahoma City. Oh wait, that was a
> > > repugnant that hated Clinton too.
> >
> > You call *him* desperate & then you equate McVeigh as representing
> > Republicans in general? At least you could bring up Ruby Ridge or Waco.
Oh,
> > but nobody died in those incidents - which were presided over by the
> > Clinton administraton - either, I suppose?
>
> Did you just say nobody died at Waco? Are we talking about Waco as in
> David Koresh and his "let's all go down in flames" cult?
Yes, I am trying to be as absurd as you are... am I succeeding?
--
Neil Henderson
Progressive Rock
http://www.saqqararecords.com
dansteel
May 8th 04, 08:58 AM
George M. Middius > wrote in message >...
> > said:
>
> > > At least you could bring up Oklahoma City. Oh wait, that was a
> > > repugnant that hated Clinton too.
> >
> > You call *him* desperate & then you equate McVeigh as representing
> > Republicans in general? At least you could bring up Ruby Ridge or Waco. Oh,
> > but nobody died in those incidents - which were presided over by the
> > Clinton administraton - either, I suppose?
>
> Did you just say nobody died at Waco? Are we talking about Waco as in
> David Koresh and his "let's all go down in flames" cult?
They're not dead...they've been born again...resurrected...in the name
of Mel...if only certain others had been there with them...
dansteel
May 9th 04, 12:19 AM
George M. Middius > wrote in message >...
> dansteel said:
>
> > > > > At least you could bring up Oklahoma City. Oh wait, that was a
> > > > > repugnant that hated Clinton too.
> > > >
> > > > You call *him* desperate & then you equate McVeigh as representing
> > > > Republicans in general? At least you could bring up Ruby Ridge or Waco. Oh,
> > > > but nobody died in those incidents - which were presided over by the
> > > > Clinton administraton - either, I suppose?
> > >
> > > Did you just say nobody died at Waco? Are we talking about Waco as in
> > > David Koresh and his "let's all go down in flames" cult?
> >
> >
> > They're not dead...they've been born again...resurrected...in the name
> > of Mel...if only certain others had been there with them...
>
> Nice palliation. You realize, of course, that's what the islamists say
> about the deaths they cause.
not seriously trying to lessen the tragedy..just dark humor...as far
what "they say"...religious (and political extremists have a history
of similar actions even if their dogma varies in details.
My dogma was run over by my karma so I'm a tad bitter. Oops. I think I
just palliated on myself again.
Michael McKelvy
May 9th 04, 12:25 AM
"STOP BUSH NOW" > wrote in message
om...
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message could lie
under oath , why not them.
> > >
> > > To quote a recent bupersticker:
> > >
> > > When Clinton lied, nobody died.
> > >
> > >
> > Black Hawk Down.
>
>
> Man, talk about desperate.
>
> At least you could bring up Oklahoma City. Oh wait, that was a
> repugnant that hated Clinton too.
Clinton sent troops all over the world. Are you saying nobody died in any
of those missions?
The guy lost the nuke codes twice according to a secret service agent once
assigned to him. If nobody died on his watch, it's just dumb luck.
Michael McKelvy
May 9th 04, 12:26 AM
"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> > said:
>
> > > At least you could bring up Oklahoma City. Oh wait, that was a
> > > repugnant that hated Clinton too.
> >
> > You call *him* desperate & then you equate McVeigh as representing
> > Republicans in general? At least you could bring up Ruby Ridge or Waco.
Oh,
> > but nobody died in those incidents - which were presided over by the
> > Clinton administraton - either, I suppose?
>
> Did you just say nobody died at Waco? Are we talking about Waco as in
> David Koresh and his "let's all go down in flames" cult?
>
>
>
You missed a big hunk o' sarcasm, George.
Michael McKelvy
May 9th 04, 12:28 AM
"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> > said:
>
> > > > > At least you could bring up Oklahoma City. Oh wait, that was a
> > > > > repugnant that hated Clinton too.
> > > >
> > > > You call *him* desperate & then you equate McVeigh as representing
> > > > Republicans in general? At least you could bring up Ruby Ridge or
Waco.
> > > > but nobody died in those incidents - which were presided over by the
> > > > Clinton administraton - either, I suppose?
> > >
> > > Did you just say nobody died at Waco? Are we talking about Waco as in
> > > David Koresh and his "let's all go down in flames" cult?
> >
> > Yes, I am trying to be as absurd as you are... am I succeeding?
>
> So your comment that "nobody died" anticipated a future comment I was
> going to make? How did you manage to see the future like that?
>
>
>
Uh, George, you're sorta predictable.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.