Uh-Oh! Kerry Lied About Vietnam Claims

[pyjamarama]

This should be fun...


1971 VIDEO: KERRY ADMITS THROWING OWN MEDALS; CONTRADICTS CURRENT
CLAIMS

In an interview published Friday in the LOS ANGELES TIMES, Dem
presidential hopeful John Kerry claimed he "never ever implied" that
he threw his own medals during a Hill protest in 1971 to appear as an
antiwar hero.

But a new shock video shows John Kerry -- in his own voice -- saying
he did!

ABC's GOOD MORNING AMERICA is set to rock the political world Monday
morning with an airing of Kerry's specific 1971 boast, sources tell
the DRUDGE REPORT.

The video was made by a local news station in 1971.

It directly contradicts Kerry's own website headline: "RIGHTWING
FICTION: John Kerry threw away his medals during a Vietnam war
protest."

Kerry's campaign refused comment Sunday afternoon, citing a policy not
to respond to the DRUDGE REPORT.

Developing...

[bernard spilman]

Still kissing that cracker ass, huh Tombo.
WS

"pyjamarama" > wrote in message
om...
> This should be fun...
>
>
> 1971 VIDEO: KERRY ADMITS THROWING OWN MEDALS; CONTRADICTS CURRENT
> CLAIMS
>
> In an interview published Friday in the LOS ANGELES TIMES, Dem
> presidential hopeful John Kerry claimed he "never ever implied" that
> he threw his own medals during a Hill protest in 1971 to appear as an
> antiwar hero.
>
> But a new shock video shows John Kerry -- in his own voice -- saying
> he did!
>
> ABC's GOOD MORNING AMERICA is set to rock the political world Monday
> morning with an airing of Kerry's specific 1971 boast, sources tell
> the DRUDGE REPORT.
>
> The video was made by a local news station in 1971.
>
> It directly contradicts Kerry's own website headline: "RIGHTWING
> FICTION: John Kerry threw away his medals during a Vietnam war
> protest."
>
> Kerry's campaign refused comment Sunday afternoon, citing a policy not
> to respond to the DRUDGE REPORT.
>
> Developing...

[Michael McKelvy]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message
. com...
> Still kissing that cracker ass, huh Tombo.
> WS
>
So, you'd be one of the people who will be voting for Kerry, not because of
his politcs of his leadership abilitiy, but because he's "not Bush."

Since your responses don't have anything more than personal attacks, there
is no other conclusion to be reached.

I'm afraid you'll be very disappointed.

[pyjamarama]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message >...
> Still kissing that cracker ass, huh Tombo.
> WS

Still wallowing in vile racism, eh mouth-breather?

How "liberal" of you.


>
> "pyjamarama" > wrote in message
> om...
> > This should be fun...
> >
> >
> > 1971 VIDEO: KERRY ADMITS THROWING OWN MEDALS; CONTRADICTS CURRENT
> > CLAIMS
> >
> > In an interview published Friday in the LOS ANGELES TIMES, Dem
> > presidential hopeful John Kerry claimed he "never ever implied" that
> > he threw his own medals during a Hill protest in 1971 to appear as an
> > antiwar hero.
> >
> > But a new shock video shows John Kerry -- in his own voice -- saying
> > he did!
> >
> > ABC's GOOD MORNING AMERICA is set to rock the political world Monday
> > morning with an airing of Kerry's specific 1971 boast, sources tell
> > the DRUDGE REPORT.
> >
> > The video was made by a local news station in 1971.
> >
> > It directly contradicts Kerry's own website headline: "RIGHTWING
> > FICTION: John Kerry threw away his medals during a Vietnam war
> > protest."
> >
> > Kerry's campaign refused comment Sunday afternoon, citing a policy not
> > to respond to the DRUDGE REPORT.
> >
> > Developing...

[bernard spilman]

You're the one kissing KKK ass, Clarence.
WS

"pyjamarama" > wrote in message
om...
> "bernard spilman" > wrote in message
>...
> > Still kissing that cracker ass, huh Tombo.
> > WS
>
> Still wallowing in vile racism, eh mouth-breather?
>
> How "liberal" of you.
>
>
> >
> > "pyjamarama" > wrote in message
> > om...
> > > This should be fun...
> > >
> > >
> > > 1971 VIDEO: KERRY ADMITS THROWING OWN MEDALS; CONTRADICTS CURRENT
> > > CLAIMS
> > >
> > > In an interview published Friday in the LOS ANGELES TIMES, Dem
> > > presidential hopeful John Kerry claimed he "never ever implied" that
> > > he threw his own medals during a Hill protest in 1971 to appear as an
> > > antiwar hero.
> > >
> > > But a new shock video shows John Kerry -- in his own voice -- saying
> > > he did!
> > >
> > > ABC's GOOD MORNING AMERICA is set to rock the political world Monday
> > > morning with an airing of Kerry's specific 1971 boast, sources tell
> > > the DRUDGE REPORT.
> > >
> > > The video was made by a local news station in 1971.
> > >
> > > It directly contradicts Kerry's own website headline: "RIGHTWING
> > > FICTION: John Kerry threw away his medals during a Vietnam war
> > > protest."
> > >
> > > Kerry's campaign refused comment Sunday afternoon, citing a policy not
> > > to respond to the DRUDGE REPORT.
> > >
> > > Developing...

[bernard spilman]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
nk.net...
>
> "bernard spilman" > wrote in message
> . com...
> > Still kissing that cracker ass, huh Tombo.
> > WS
> >
> So, you'd be one of the people who will be voting for Kerry, not because
of
> his politcs of his leadership abilitiy, but because he's "not Bush."

That's as good a reason as any.

> Since your responses don't have anything more than personal attacks, there
> is no other conclusion to be reached.

To those so deserving of personal attacks.

> I'm afraid you'll be very disappointed.


I've been VERY disappointed for the last three years, what's
another four.
WS

[pyjamarama]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message >...
> You're the one kissing KKK ass, Clarence.
> WS

Robert Byrd is one of yours, redneck.

Next?

>
> "pyjamarama" > wrote in message
> om...
> > "bernard spilman" > wrote in message
> >...
> > > Still kissing that cracker ass, huh Tombo.
> > > WS
> >
> > Still wallowing in vile racism, eh mouth-breather?
> >
> > How "liberal" of you.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > "pyjamarama" > wrote in message
> > > om...
> > > > This should be fun...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1971 VIDEO: KERRY ADMITS THROWING OWN MEDALS; CONTRADICTS CURRENT
> > > > CLAIMS
> > > >
> > > > In an interview published Friday in the LOS ANGELES TIMES, Dem
> > > > presidential hopeful John Kerry claimed he "never ever implied" that
> > > > he threw his own medals during a Hill protest in 1971 to appear as an
> > > > antiwar hero.
> > > >
> > > > But a new shock video shows John Kerry -- in his own voice -- saying
> > > > he did!
> > > >
> > > > ABC's GOOD MORNING AMERICA is set to rock the political world Monday
> > > > morning with an airing of Kerry's specific 1971 boast, sources tell
> > > > the DRUDGE REPORT.
> > > >
> > > > The video was made by a local news station in 1971.
> > > >
> > > > It directly contradicts Kerry's own website headline: "RIGHTWING
> > > > FICTION: John Kerry threw away his medals during a Vietnam war
> > > > protest."
> > > >
> > > > Kerry's campaign refused comment Sunday afternoon, citing a policy not
> > > > to respond to the DRUDGE REPORT.
> > > >
> > > > Developing...

[Michael McKelvy]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message
. com...
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> nk.net...
> >
> > "bernard spilman" > wrote in message
> > . com...
> > > Still kissing that cracker ass, huh Tombo.
> > > WS
> > >
> > So, you'd be one of the people who will be voting for Kerry, not because
> of
> > his politcs of his leadership abilitiy, but because he's "not Bush."
>
> That's as good a reason as any.
>
For what reason?

> > Since your responses don't have anything more than personal attacks,
there
> > is no other conclusion to be reached.
>
> To those so deserving of personal attacks.
>
According to your abritrary standards.

> > I'm afraid you'll be very disappointed.
>
>
> I've been VERY disappointed for the last three years, what's
> another four.
> WS
>
I don't suppose there's any chance you might actually be able to elucidate
any factual reason why you oppose Bush.

[bernard spilman]

> Robert Byrd is one of yours, redneck.
>
> Next?

??????? Robert Byrd, one of mine!? I've never claimed Robert Byrd as
one of mine. Look dude, the people you are supporting are the same people
who used to call my house on the telephone when I was 8-10 years old;
and say things like "We gone come an' git yer ni**er-lovin' daddy." They
use code-words for their hateful messages now, but its the same people
with the same philosophy: "White Christians are superior to every living
thing on earth." I hear things in conversations that you will never hear.
To
the rank-and-file right winger you will never be anything more than "one of
the good ones" or "one that knows his place." They welcome your support
and your vote, but will never truly welcome you into their homes, churchs,
families, or hearts. Just go to the next NASCAR race and see what a good
time
you have.
WS

[bernard spilman]

> I don't suppose there's any chance you might actually be able to elucidate
> any factual reason why you oppose Bush.

1- He makes up his mind that he is going to do something, and then
will hear no factual argument against that thing. He acts based on
ideology and not pragmatism.

2- He claims that God tells him what to do, and favors all that he does.

3- He lied to the American People.

4- He is a draft-dodger who has painted himself as an American hero,
even while slandering Americans who REALLY have put themselves
on the line for their nation (John McCain, Max Cleland,...etc).

5- He spent twenty years in a drunken stupor.

6- He cannot pronounce thousands of words in the English language,
including "America" or "terrorist."

7- He has the poorest record of any American president in the last
100 years, Hoover included.

I got more if you need 'em.
WS

[bernard spilman]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> bernard spilman - > -
lundi
> 26 Avril 2004 20:40 wrote:
>
> > > Robert Byrd is one of yours, redneck.
> >>
> >> Next?
> >
> > ??????? Robert Byrd, one of mine!? I've never claimed Robert Byrd as
> > one of mine. Look dude, the people you are supporting are the same
people
> > who used to call my house on the telephone when I was 8-10 years old;
> > and say things like "We gone come an' git yer ni**er-lovin' daddy." They
> > use code-words for their hateful messages now, but its the same people
> > with the same philosophy: "White Christians are superior to every living
> > thing on earth." I hear things in conversations that you will never
hear.
>
> Where did you live during your childhood ? How old are you ?

North Carolina, Forty-five.

> > To
> > the rank-and-file right winger you will never be anything more than "one
> > of
> > the good ones" or "one that knows his place." They welcome your support
> > and your vote, but will never truly welcome you into their homes,
churchs,
> > families, or hearts. Just go to the next NASCAR race and see what a good
> > time
> > you have.
>
> I don't understand the link with the NASCAR.

Though the actual racing association is trying its best to change (hopefully
not just the image) the make-up of its demographic base,
the sought-after "NASCAR Dads" are largely the remnants\descendants
of crowds you used to see lining the streets to throw bricks and insults at
those
trying to peacefully gain their civil rights (And coming under the cover of
darkness
to do worse). There is one reason and one reason ONLY that republican
candidates consistently do better than democrats in the South: The democrats
are associated with support for equal rights for all Americans. I fear that
association has damned the Democrats for generations to come, but if I
(as a registered Democrat) am to be damned, let it be for that!
WS

[Michael McKelvy]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message
om...
> > I don't suppose there's any chance you might actually be able to
elucidate
> > any factual reason why you oppose Bush.
>
> 1- He makes up his mind that he is going to do something, and then
> will hear no factual argument against that thing. He acts based on
> ideology and not pragmatism.
>
And that's bad because....?
Lots of people prefer a leader with a set of values that they stick to.

> 2- He claims that God tells him what to do, and favors all that he does.
>
Sounds kinda like Carter.

> 3- He lied to the American People.
>
No proof of that whatsoever.

> 4- He is a draft-dodger who has painted himself as an American hero,

Wrong twice.

> even while slandering Americans who REALLY have put themselves
> on the line for their nation (John McCain, Max Cleland,...etc).
>
McCain is a real hero, don't know that much about Cleland. McCain is a wild
card on any given moment.
His campaign refrom bill should have been thrown out.


> 5- He spent twenty years in a drunken stupor.
>
As opposed to 8 like Clinton did in the White House?
He changed his life, how long does he have to pay for past mistakes?

> 6- He cannot pronounce thousands of words in the English language,
> including "America" or "terrorist."

And that has what to do with leadership? Maybe he just sucks at public
speaking.

>
> 7- He has the poorest record of any American president in the last
> 100 years, Hoover included.
>
On what? He's cut taxes, signed new education law whcih Teddy Kennedy
wrote, He's uccessfully prosecuting a war that removed one of the most awful
dictators in history. Got Congress to vote in tough new law to get
terrorists.

> I got more if you need 'em.
> WS
>
Just one that means anything would be good.
Oh yeah, it also has to be true.

So far he isn't any worse than most presidents of the last 100 years. FDR
did more damage to the economic future of this country, JFK was a chronic
drug user and bigamist, Carter couldn't find his ass with both hands, Nixon
was paranoid, Clinton was the biggest liar of all, Truman ordered the
Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, LBJ escalated the VN war.

How do you figure Bush is any worse than any of them?

[Schizoid Man]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>
> "bernard spilman" > wrote in message

> > Still kissing that cracker ass, huh Tombo.
> > WS
> >
> So, you'd be one of the people who will be voting for Kerry, not because
of
> his politcs of his leadership abilitiy, but because he's "not Bush."


There is no debate about it. Unlike Bush, who fearlessly and selflessly
served his country in the Texas National Guard (even though no one remembers
him showing up for work), Kerry didn't so much as lose a limb in Vietnam.

How can you begin to even compare the two?


> Since your responses don't have anything more than personal attacks, there
> is no other conclusion to be reached.
>
> I'm afraid you'll be very disappointed.

[pyjamarama]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message >...
> > Robert Byrd is one of yours, redneck.
> >
> > Next?
>
> ??????? Robert Byrd, one of mine!? I've never claimed Robert Byrd as
> one of mine. Look dude, the people you are supporting are the same people
> who used to call my house on the telephone when I was 8-10 years old;
> and say things like "We gone come an' git yer ni**er-lovin' daddy." They
> use code-words for their hateful messages now, but its the same people
> with the same philosophy: "White Christians are superior to every living
> thing on earth." I hear things in conversations that you will never hear.
> To
> the rank-and-file right winger you will never be anything more than "one of
> the good ones" or "one that knows his place." They welcome your support
> and your vote, but will never truly welcome you into their homes, churchs,
> families, or hearts. Just go to the next NASCAR race and see what a good
> time
> you have.
> WS

What an absolute load of ****. Didn't miss a single stereotype, did
you? (except "tombo" and "Clarence", but you covered that in your last
post, eh?)

What's really ironic is that you see yourself as enlightened yet have
no clue as to how bigoted you really are.

I hope all that latent racism does something for you...

It sickens me.

[Madelin McKinnon]

Truth is scarce these days. Like Kerry said, the media is trying to do
the work of the Republican National Committee. Truth is a
hullucination in the Bush Administration, botth inside and outside -in
regards to the environment they are creating:

http://www.geocities.com/botenth/michael.htm

[Michael McKelvy]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message
om...
> > Robert Byrd is one of yours, redneck.
> >
> > Next?
>
> ??????? Robert Byrd, one of mine!? I've never claimed Robert Byrd as
> one of mine. Look dude, the people you are supporting are the same people
> who used to call my house on the telephone when I was 8-10 years old;
> and say things like "We gone come an' git yer ni**er-lovin' daddy."

You fucing moron, those were DEMOCRATS.

They
> use code-words for their hateful messages now, but its the same people
> with the same philosophy: "White Christians are superior to every living
> thing on earth."

But they have only the same power at the ballot box as us atheists.



I hear things in conversations that you will never hear.
> To
> the rank-and-file right winger you will never be anything more than "one
of
> the good ones" or "one that knows his place." They welcome your support
> and your vote, but will never truly welcome you into their homes, churchs,
> families, or hearts. Just go to the next NASCAR race and see what a good
> time
> you have.
> WS
>
That must be why it was Fritz Hollings who raised the Confederate flag over
his statehouse. Or why Bill Clinton's mentor was one of the leading
segregationists, or why Al Gore Sr. voted against the civil rights act.

[bernard spilman]

> You fucing moron, those were DEMOCRATS.

Why don't you come to my ****ing house and tell me that , pussy.
WS

[Michael McKelvy]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message
. com...
>
> > You fucing moron, those were DEMOCRATS.
>
> Why don't you come to my ****ing house and tell me that , pussy.
> WS
>
>
Why not do some research on who the segregationists really were, most of
them were Democrats. If it had been up to them the civil rights act would
never have passed.

[bernard spilman]

> Why not do some research on who the segregationists really were, most of
> them were Democrats. If it had been up to them the civil rights act would
> never have passed.

They were the infamous "Dixiecrats." They all left the Democratic Party
to jump on the Nixon bandwagon after LBJ signed the voting rights act.
WS

[Michael McKelvy]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message
. com...
> > Why not do some research on who the segregationists really were, most of
> > them were Democrats. If it had been up to them the civil rights act
would
> > never have passed.
>
> They were the infamous "Dixiecrats." They all left the Democratic Party
> to jump on the Nixon bandwagon after LBJ signed the voting rights act.
> WS
>
>
Some did, some just stayed Democrats. The facts are that without
Republicans the Civil Right act would have not been passed. Just because
some Democrats thought that they could still be racists if they joined the
GOP doesn't make it GOP policy to be racist. Frankly the GOP doesn't really
care about any color other than green according to some.

No Democrat President has ever appointed as many high profile minorities as
GW Bush.

I doubt very seriously if Sen. Byrd would be allowed into the GOP.

[Michael McKelvy]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Another high point of intellectual perspicacity for the Bug Eater.
>
> > Why not do some research on who the segregationists really were, most of
> > them were Democrats. If it had been up to them the civil rights act
would
> > never have passed.
>
> Is this why you say the Democrats are the scourge of modern American
> politics -- because 100 years ago, they were the reactionaries and the
> Republicans were the progressives?
>
>
>
No, because the Democrat politicians are liars and thieves.

[bernard spilman]

> Some did, some just stayed Democrats. The facts are that without
> Republicans the Civil Right act would have not been passed. Just because
> some Democrats thought that they could still be racists if they joined the
> GOP doesn't make it GOP policy to be racist. Frankly the GOP doesn't
really
> care about any color other than green according to some.

You can't just say that things are the way you think they are.
Where do you live? Have you ever been involved in politics at
any kind of an organizational level?

> No Democrat President has ever appointed as many high profile minorities
as
> GW Bush.

Condoleeza Rice- If Bush comes to a sudden stop, her nose gets broken.
Not so much an advisor as a yes-woman. A token

Colin Powell- Good man, too bad the Bush administration just ignores him.

Rod Page- ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Another yes-man token.

Your point?

> I doubt very seriously if Sen. Byrd would be allowed into the GOP.

If he is still in the Senate, Laura Bush would suck his dick to get him into
the GOP. Either party would so similarly.
Not that it would matter what ANY republican had to say in the matter,
idiot,
all anyone has to do is go to their county elections board and change it.
WS

[bernard spilman]

> No, because the Democrat politicians are liars and thieves.

ALLMOST! Just remove "the Democrat" and you finally have
written one word of truth.
WS

[pyjamarama]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message >...
> > You fucing moron, those were DEMOCRATS.
>
> Why don't you come to my ****ing house and tell me that , pussy.
> WS

You're a knee-jerk racist AND you threaten violence...

Nifty.

[bernard spilman]

"pyjamarama" > wrote in message
m...
> "bernard spilman" > wrote in message
>...
> > > You fucing moron, those were DEMOCRATS.
> >
> > Why don't you come to my ****ing house and tell me that , pussy.
> > WS
>
> You're a knee-jerk racist AND you threaten violence...
>
> Nifty.

Tell me, which do you find more fulfilling, steppin' or fetchin'?
WS

[pyjamarama]

(Madelin McKinnon) wrote in message >...
> Truth is scarce these days. Like Kerry said, the media is trying to do
> the work of the Republican National Committee. Truth is a
> hullucination in the Bush Administration, botth inside and outside -in
> regards to the environment they are creating:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/botenth/michael.htm

So Michael Jackson's pedophilia and Scott Peterson murdering his wife
have what, exactly, to do with the Bush administration?

Fasten tightly your aluminum hat and think hard...

This should be good.

[pyjamarama]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message >...
> "pyjamarama" > wrote in message
> m...
> > "bernard spilman" > wrote in message
> >...
> > > > You fucing moron, those were DEMOCRATS.
> > >
> > > Why don't you come to my ****ing house and tell me that , pussy.
> > > WS
> >
> > You're a knee-jerk racist AND you threaten violence...
> >
> > Nifty.
>
> Tell me, which do you find more fulfilling, steppin' or fetchin'?
> WS

What, no death-threat? You disappoint.

[bernard spilman]

> What, no death-threat? You disappoint.

You've been dead for years.
WS

[Michael McKelvy]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message
. com...
> > Some did, some just stayed Democrats. The facts are that without
> > Republicans the Civil Right act would have not been passed. Just
because
> > some Democrats thought that they could still be racists if they joined
the
> > GOP doesn't make it GOP policy to be racist. Frankly the GOP doesn't
> really
> > care about any color other than green according to some.
>
> You can't just say that things are the way you think they are.
> Where do you live? Have you ever been involved in politics at
> any kind of an organizational level?
>
> > No Democrat President has ever appointed as many high profile minorities
> as
> > GW Bush.
>
> Condoleeza Rice- If Bush comes to a sudden stop, her nose gets broken.
> Not so much an advisor as a yes-woman. A token
>
Attempt to maginalize one of the most respected people in her field, noted.

> Colin Powell- Good man, too bad the Bush administration just ignores him.
>
OSAF. Lack of proof noted.

> Rod Page- ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Another yes-man token.
>
> Your point?
>
My point is that if they were Democrats they'd be hailed as heroic, land
mark appointments.

> > I doubt very seriously if Sen. Byrd would be allowed into the GOP.
>
> If he is still in the Senate, Laura Bush would suck his dick to get him
into
> the GOP. Either party would so similarly.

I think that the GOP has somewhat higher standards than you believe, look
how far they distanced themselves from that idiot from Louisiana.

> Not that it would matter what ANY republican had to say in the matter,
> idiot,
> all anyone has to do is go to their county elections board and change it.
> WS
>
>
Why do you keep confusing the Democrats with the Republicans?

[Madelin McKinnon]

(pyjamarama) wrote in message >...
> (Madelin McKinnon) wrote in message >...
> > Truth is scarce these days. Like Kerry said, the media is trying to do
> > the work of the Republican National Committee. Truth is a
> > hullucination in the Bush Administration, botth inside and outside -in
> > regards to the environment they are creating:
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/botenth/michael.htm
>
> So Michael Jackson's pedophilia and Scott Peterson murdering his wife
> have what, exactly, to do with the Bush administration?
>
> Fasten tightly your aluminum hat and think hard...
>
> This should be good.

They don't understand the truth:

http://www.geocities.com/newsworld55/plot.htm

[pyjamarama]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message >...
> > What, no death-threat? You disappoint.
>
> You've been dead for years.
> WS

How scathingly clever.

At least you know when you've been beat...

Good luck with that seething racism thang.

[bernard spilman]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "bernard spilman" > wrote in message
> . com...
> > > Some did, some just stayed Democrats. The facts are that without
> > > Republicans the Civil Right act would have not been passed. Just
> because
> > > some Democrats thought that they could still be racists if they joined
> the
> > > GOP doesn't make it GOP policy to be racist. Frankly the GOP doesn't
> > really
> > > care about any color other than green according to some.
> >
> > You can't just say that things are the way you think they are.
> > Where do you live? Have you ever been involved in politics at
> > any kind of an organizational level?
> >
> > > No Democrat President has ever appointed as many high profile
minorities
> > as
> > > GW Bush.
> >
> > Condoleeza Rice- If Bush comes to a sudden stop, her nose gets broken.
> > Not so much an advisor as a yes-woman. A token
> >
> Attempt to maginalize one of the most respected people in her field,
noted.

She marginalizes herself well enough. And what is with that stupid-ass
"noted" bull****? You use it in every post you make. Its a
passive-aggressive
expression that makes no point and serves no purpose in an argument. You
would at least seem intelligent if you were to structure the above sentence
as follows:

"You wrongly attempt to marginalize one of the most respected people
in her field."

You have a rhetorical style better suited to a middle-school playground.


> > Colin Powell- Good man, too bad the Bush administration just ignores
him.
> >
> OSAF. Lack of proof noted.

There's that "noted" crap again. Suggestion: "You have no proof of that."

Bob Woodward's and Richard Clarke's books both strongly indicate that
Powell is left out of the inner circle. I know, they both are liberal and
freedom-
hating Democrats, right? (Both are Republicans).


> > Rod Page- ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Another yes-man token.
> >
> > Your point?
> >
> My point is that if they were Democrats they'd be hailed as heroic, land
> mark appointments.

No, I would hope the Democrats would have appointed, and listened to,
competent
people, regardless of race.


> > > I doubt very seriously if Sen. Byrd would be allowed into the GOP.
> >
> > If he is still in the Senate, Laura Bush would suck his dick to get him
> >into
> > the GOP. Either party would so similarly.
>
> I think that the GOP has somewhat higher standards than you believe, look
> how far they distanced themselves from that idiot from Louisiana.


??????????????????? You bring up a point in an argument and you
don't even know the name?


> > Not that it would matter what ANY republican had to say in the matter,
> > idiot,
> > all anyone has to do is go to their county elections board and change
it.
> > WS
> >
> >

> Why do you keep confusing the Democrats with the Republicans?<

??????? Is that directly responding to my last statement? If it is, that has
nothing to do with Democrat or Republican, its the law. A person can
register
under any party affiliation he or she desires.

You drink a lot, don't you. Take a high-school civics class and
stop drinking so much. You're starting to just get annoying.
I expect to see "nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah" any time now.
WS

[bernard spilman]

> Good luck with that seething racism thang.

Thanks, and good luck with your seething self-hatred thing.
WS

[pyjamarama]

(Madelin McKinnon) wrote in message >...
> (pyjamarama) wrote in message >...
> > (Madelin McKinnon) wrote in message >...
> > > Truth is scarce these days. Like Kerry said, the media is trying to do
> > > the work of the Republican National Committee. Truth is a
> > > hullucination in the Bush Administration, botth inside and outside -in
> > > regards to the environment they are creating:
> > >
> > > http://www.geocities.com/botenth/michael.htm
> >
> > So Michael Jackson's pedophilia and Scott Peterson murdering his wife
> > have what, exactly, to do with the Bush administration?
> >
> > Fasten tightly your aluminum hat and think hard...
> >
> > This should be good.
>
> They don't understand the truth:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/newsworld55/plot.htm

Tell us, Madelin...

Who was President in 1993? 1994? 1996?

Who was the Attorney General?

Do you even read your own links?

[Michael McKelvy]

"bernard spilman" > wrote in message
. com...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
> >
> > "bernard spilman" > wrote in message
> > . com...
> > > > Some did, some just stayed Democrats. The facts are that without
> > > > Republicans the Civil Right act would have not been passed. Just
> > because
> > > > some Democrats thought that they could still be racists if they
joined
> > the
> > > > GOP doesn't make it GOP policy to be racist. Frankly the GOP
doesn't
> > > really
> > > > care about any color other than green according to some.
> > >
> > > You can't just say that things are the way you think they are.
> > > Where do you live? Have you ever been involved in politics at
> > > any kind of an organizational level?
> > >
> > > > No Democrat President has ever appointed as many high profile
> minorities
> > > as
> > > > GW Bush.
> > >
> > > Condoleeza Rice- If Bush comes to a sudden stop, her nose gets broken.
> > > Not so much an advisor as a yes-woman. A token
> > >
> > Attempt to maginalize one of the most respected people in her field,
> noted.
>
> She marginalizes herself well enough. And what is with that stupid-ass
> "noted" bull****? You use it in every post you make. Its a
> passive-aggressive
> expression that makes no point and serves no purpose in an argument.

The point is that Rice is considered to be one of the top experts in her
field.

You
> would at least seem intelligent if you were to structure the above
sentence
> as follows:
>
> "You wrongly attempt to marginalize one of the most respected people
> in her field."
>
> You have a rhetorical style better suited to a middle-school playground.
>
You're saying I should bring up to your standard, a middle school locker
room?

>
> > > Colin Powell- Good man, too bad the Bush administration just ignores
> him.
> > >
> > OSAF. Lack of proof noted.
>
> There's that "noted" crap again. Suggestion: "You have no proof of that."
>
You have not proof that he's ignored.


> Bob Woodward's and Richard Clarke's books both strongly indicate that
> Powell is left out of the inner circle. I know, they both are liberal and
> freedom-
> hating Democrats, right? (Both are Republicans).
>
Woodward's the guy that gets death bed, unconfirmed statements from CIA
Directors. I think I'll take my info from living people who can answer for
themselves.
>
> > > Rod Page- ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Another yes-man token.
> > >
> > > Your point?
> > >
> > My point is that if they were Democrats they'd be hailed as heroic, land
> > mark appointments.
>
> No, I would hope the Democrats would have appointed, and listened to,
> competent
> people, regardless of race.
>
Yet they don't, they find incompetent boobs like Reno and Albright. No pun
intended.

>
> > > > I doubt very seriously if Sen. Byrd would be allowed into the GOP.
> > >
> > > If he is still in the Senate, Laura Bush would suck his dick to get
him
> > >into
> > > the GOP. Either party would so similarly.
> >
> > I think that the GOP has somewhat higher standards than you believe,
look
> > how far they distanced themselves from that idiot from Louisiana.
>
>
> ??????????????????? You bring up a point in an argument and you
> don't even know the name?
>
>
There aren't that many KKK members that I try to remember.

> > > Not that it would matter what ANY republican had to say in the
matter,
> > > idiot,
> > > all anyone has to do is go to their county elections board and change
> it.
> > > WS
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ??????? Is that directly responding to my last statement? If it is, that
has
> nothing to do with Democrat or Republican, its the law. A person can
> register
> under any party affiliation he or she desires.
>

That's why Condoleeza Rice is a Republican, the Democrats wouldn't let her
father register, the Republicans did.

> You drink a lot, don't you.

No.

Take a high-school civics class and
> stop drinking so much. You're starting to just get annoying.
> I expect to see "nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah" any time now.
> WS
>
>
That's essentially what you've been doing.

[dave weil]

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:39:11 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> wrote:

>
>> Bob Woodward's and Richard Clarke's books both strongly indicate that
>> Powell is left out of the inner circle. I know, they both are liberal and
>> freedom-
>> hating Democrats, right? (Both are Republicans).
>>
>Woodward's the guy that gets death bed, unconfirmed statements from CIA
>Directors. I think I'll take my info from living people who can answer for
>themselves.

Actually the Bush Administration was quite happy with Woodward's book.
Apparently he was quite fair and showed President Bush is a very
favorable light.

[Michael McKelvy]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:39:11 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >> Bob Woodward's and Richard Clarke's books both strongly indicate that
> >> Powell is left out of the inner circle. I know, they both are liberal
and
> >> freedom-
> >> hating Democrats, right? (Both are Republicans).
> >>
> >Woodward's the guy that gets death bed, unconfirmed statements from CIA
> >Directors. I think I'll take my info from living people who can answer
for
> >themselves.
>
> Actually the Bush Administration was quite happy with Woodward's book.
> Apparently he was quite fair and showed President Bush is a very
> favorable light.

And they also had issues with his version of some things.

[Elbow Baggins]

(pyjamarama) wrote in message >...
> (Madelin McKinnon) wrote in message >...
> > (pyjamarama) wrote in message >...
> > > (Madelin McKinnon) wrote in message >...
> > > > Truth is scarce these days. Like Kerry said, the media is trying to do
> > > > the work of the Republican National Committee. Truth is a
> > > > hullucination in the Bush Administration, botth inside and outside -in
> > > > regards to the environment they are creating:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.geocities.com/botenth/michael.htm
> > >
> > > So Michael Jackson's pedophilia and Scott Peterson murdering his wife
> > > have what, exactly, to do with the Bush administration?
> > >
> > > Fasten tightly your aluminum hat and think hard...
> > >
> > > This should be good.
> >
> > They don't understand the truth:
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/newsworld55/plot.htm
>
> Tell us, Madelin...
>
> Who was President in 1993? 1994? 1996?
>
> Who was the Attorney General?
>
> Do you even read your own links?


We need Gary to share the meds...
Hell I feel I need an aluminum hat after trying to piece that together.
Damn I should know better too!

[Madelin McKinnon]

http://www.geocities.com/botenth/dunlap.htm