Re: RAO curiosity

[S888Wheel]

>From: Lionel
>Date: 4/11/2004 5:43 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>Everything is possible on RAO...
>
>The following dialog involves 2 RAO regulars :
>
>- A man who has engaged a lawsuit against Arnold Krueger for libel. Arnold
>Krueger would have accused him to be a pedophile. Note that I use the
>conditional mode because the matter has still not been judged at this time.

What a load of B.S. There is no question as to whether or not Arny accused me
of being a pedophile. Even he admits as much. You even lied about having
condemned his actions. Now you are claiming that you need a judgement from a
case you have condemned yourself. True hypocricy. Of course given the fact that
you have also accused me of being a pedophile from your safe haven, your
hypocricy on every level, including this new one of a passive nonpartisan
observer is all the more evident.


>
>- A man who has accused several times Arnold Krueger to be a pedophile. Note
>that he has already claimed that he have proofs that Arnold Krueger is a
>real pedophile.

Note that you also fail to mention that Krueger has accused Marc of being a
pedophile several times and does not claim to have any such evidence. Of course
this is just further evidence of your hypocricy under the failed guise of a
nonpartisan observer.


>
>These 2 men are exchanging information for delation purpose.
>
>Delation \De*la"tion\, n. [L. delatio accusation: cf. F.
> d['e]lation.]
> 2. (Law) Accusation by an informer. --Milman.

Note the claim of mind reading here.


>
>You can like, dislike or hate Arnold Krueger, if you can be a simple
>observer one second I think that, like me, you will find that it's a very
>interesting snapshot.

Sorry, your bull**** posturing as a nonpartisan observer gives you away, I am
quite confident that a true nonpartisan observer when faced with *all* the
relevent information would find Arny and you the instigators and wrong doers in
this whole mess.

I find it funny that you would give up an alleged ski trip over the weekend to
spend time doing research on this mess for the sake of trolling on RAO. Now
that makes for an interesting snapshot.

[S888Wheel]

>From: Lionel
>Date: 4/11/2004 7:26 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12 Avril
>2004 03:43 wrote:
>
>> I find it funny that you would give up an alleged ski trip over the
>> weekend.
>No ski trip. By Saturday morning the temperature increased at 10 AM the snow
>was looking like jam. So we have done a 30 km tour in mountain bike. Muddy
>but very good.
>"Alleged ski trip" sounds like class envy... LOL

No. Just seemed unlikely given your round the clock posts on RAO. You obviously
didn't have time to ski and by your own admission you didn't ski so I was just
showing reasonable caution when I said "alleged." The caution was obviously
justified. I don't ski by choice.


>
>> to spend time doing research on this mess for the sake of trolling
>> on RAO. Now that makes for an interesting snapshot.
>
>It takes 5 minutes on Google you just have to enter "Marc Phillips" AND
>"pedophile" and you have about 420 answers.

How much time did you spend reading those posts? Why didn't you do the same
search on Arny? So much for nonpartisanship. Did you do a search on yourself
and "pedophile?" Not interested in your own hypocricy?


>
>BTW the most interesting point for me was to see you, a venerable and
>respectable father of a respectable californian family, complotting with a
>"criminal" for *delation* purpose.
>*This* is what I call a curiosity.



>
>Criminal \Crim"i*nal\, n.
> One who has commited a crime; especially, one who is found
> guilty by verdict, confession, or proof; a malefactor; a
> felon.


If Marc is a criminal so are you. How does your family feel about your
selfproclaimed criminal behavior? By the way I don't think Marc is a criminal
so there is no dilema for me. So which is it? Are you a criminal or a hypocrite
and a liar? I know which one I think you are.

>
>For the rest considering all the effort you have done to focalize the RAO
>attention on you, I have the right to request a minimum of gratitude from
>you.

It is odd that you have chosen to obsess over me. Funny, I start threads about
audio related subjects and you start threads trolling me with more false
accusations of pedophilia. I think there in lies the true reflections of each
of us.

>
>
>I put hereafter the prose of one of your famous supporter, you look more and
>more to the RAO "godfather" since most of your supporter should be in
>prison :

You and Arny are hardly my supporters. The two of you seem to fit your idea of
criminals.

>
>Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
>Date :2002-08-21 15:46:03 PST
>
>"Yustabe Yustabe" > wrote in message

>
>> Maybe he's like you.
>>
>> necrophiliac?
>>
>> pedophile?
>>
>> necrophiliac pedophile?
>
>Mr. Sackman I regret to inform you that in Michigan both necrophilia
>and pedophilia are serious crimes. Accusing me of them is rather
>obviously a serious claim. If you really believe that you have
>evidence or factual knowledge relating to these crimes, you have the
>legal responsibility to provide it to the nearest law enforcement
>agency, which would be the Grosse Pointe Woods Police, whose phone
>number is 313-343-2421.
>
>Mr. Sackman, if you have legal evidence that I'm either a necrophilia
>or a pedophile, and you don't turn it over to the law enforcement
>officials, that makes you an accessory after the fact. You can be
>prosecuted along with me! Needless to say these same legal
>consequences apply to any other rec.audio.opinion person who is in
>the same situation, such as Marc Phillips.
>
>So, Mr. Sackman if you don't report me, it basically means you have
>no evidence or you share some guilt with me. So what are you, Marc
>Phillips, Jamie Benchimol, Leon North going to to. Are you going to
>admit that you are lying and this is all a bad joke, or are you going
>to turn your evidence over to the appropriate law enforcement agency,
>or are you going to go to court and be tried for you crimes with me?
>
>
>
>
>
>

All that research on RAO and you still come out looking like a hypocrite. Good
job!

[S888Wheel]

>Date: 4/12/2004 5:29 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12 Avril
>2004 06:59 wrote:
>
>>>From: Lionel
>>>Date: 4/11/2004 7:26 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
>>>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12
>>>Avril 2004 03:43 wrote:
>>>
>>>> I find it funny that you would give up an alleged ski trip over the
>>>> weekend.
>>>No ski trip. By Saturday morning the temperature increased at 10 AM the
>>>snow was looking like jam. So we have done a 30 km tour in mountain bike.
>>>Muddy but very good.
>>>"Alleged ski trip" sounds like class envy... LOL
>>
>> No. Just seemed unlikely given your round the clock posts on RAO.
>
>For those who are interested and who like statistics :
>
>- S888Wheel contribution to RAO between the 2004/01/01 and 2004/03/31 is 579
>messages. Not necessary to precise that a minimum of 90% of these posts are
>extensively consacred to Arnold Krueger.
>- For the same period my contribution to RAO is 439 which means 24% less
>than him.
>

Wow an enormous difference!. Idiot. You completely missed my point of course.
You had been posting regularly around the clock. You also have been doing all
kinds of searches. Just look at what you researched for this post. One has to
ask when were you even sleeping. Yours looks like obsessive behavior.


>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his first message at : 00:03:55 PST
>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his last message at : 20:51:14 PST
>
>17 hours posting... In a normal day this mean that a normal guy have a
>maximum of 7 hours for working, sleeping, eating, washing, ****ing...
>purposes. LOL

Having trouble with your math and basic logic once ahgain I see.


>
>> You
>> obviously didn't have time to ski and by your own admission you didn't ski
>> so I was just showing reasonable caution when I said "alleged." The
>> caution was obviously justified.
>
>You was surely informed that the wind will turn to South on the Mont-Mezenc
>by Saturday morning around 8 o'clock. ;-)

No. I don't obsess over you. That is the sort of thing you do with me. Kinda
creepy. More and more like Arny every day.


>
>> I don't ski by choice.
>
>I hate you and what you are by choice.

So we have one more resident looser who suffers from the usual symptoms of
stupidity and class envy. You ought not to devote such energy towards me. It is
rather pathetic.


>
>>>> to spend time doing research on this mess for the sake of trolling
>>>> on RAO. Now that makes for an interesting snapshot.
>>>
>>>It takes 5 minutes on Google you just have to enter "Marc Phillips" AND
>>>"pedophile" and you have about 420 answers.
>>
>> How much time did you spend reading those posts? Why didn't you do the
>> same search on Arny? So much for nonpartisanship. Did you do a search on
>> yourself and "pedophile?" Not interested in your own hypocricy?
>
>I didn't read all this garbage I just pick-up and excerpt of one message
>found on the first Google page. Estimated maximum time for a guy with a
>minimum Google skill : 2 minutes.

Try the search on your name and pedophile and reflect on your own ****ed up
behavior for a while. That might be time well spent for a change.


>
>>>BTW the most interesting point for me was to see you, a venerable and
>>>respectable father of a respectable californian family, complotting with a
>>>"criminal" for *delation* purpose.
>>>*This* is what I call a curiosity.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Criminal \Crim"i*nal\, n.
>>> One who has commited a crime; especially, one who is found
>>> guilty by verdict, confession, or proof; a malefactor; a
>>> felon.
>>
>>
>> If Marc is a criminal so are you. How does your family feel about your
>> selfproclaimed criminal behavior? By the way I don't think Marc is a
>> criminal so there is no dilema for me. So which is it? Are you a criminal
>> or a hypocrite and a liar? I know which one I think you are.
>
>I know that according to your standards I am a criminal and I confirm that
>I'm very proud of this compliment.

Nice try at mind reading. You are an idiot and a hypocrite and a liar by my
standards. Just like Arny. You are too ****ing stupid to know the difference
between a civil suit and the pressing of criminal charges. I have accused no
one of any crime dip****. Nice to know you are proud of your selfproclaimed
criminal standing though. At least you have that to brag about.


>I know that you use to listen music at home with Californian criminals,
>according to your standards and according to Californian law.


You obviosly don't know jack. You wonder why I call you an idiot?


>I know that you are complotting an act of delation with a californian
>criminal.

You seem to live in a fantasy world full of criminals of your invention. What
does that say about you?


>Concerning my family information I am confident that you will collect all
>needed data for an extended and clean delation. You are proving that you
>and Marc Phillips have all the skill to do that. It's a job for
>specialists...
>LOL !

Wow you are indeed the French Arny Krueger.


>
>>>For the rest considering all the effort you have done to focalize the RAO
>>>attention on you, I have the right to request a minimum of gratitude from
>>>you.
>>
>> It is odd that you have chosen to obsess over me. Funny, I start threads
>> about audio related subjects and you start threads trolling me with more
>> false accusations of pedophilia. I think there in lies the true
>> reflections of each of us.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I put hereafter the prose of one of your famous supporter, you look more
>>>and more to the RAO "godfather" since most of your supporter should be in
>>>prison :
>>
>> You and Arny are hardly my supporters. The two of you seem to fit your
>> idea of criminals.
>>
>>>
>
>[snip Art Sackman accusations of "necrophiliac pedophile"]
>
>>
>> All that research on RAO and you still come out looking like a hypocrite.
>> Good job!
>
>Yes according to your standards I am a hypocrite... I appreciate the
>compliment Mr Delator, sincerely. ;-)

Yep. Unfortunately for you, my standards are pretty normal on the subject.


>
>Delator \De*la"tor\, n. [L.]
> An accuser; an informer. [R.] --Howell.
>
>
>
>
>
>

I'm sure you have one person agreeing with you. Good job again.

[S888Wheel]

>Date: 4/12/2004 8:37 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12 Avril
>2004 16:49 wrote:
>
>>>Date: 4/12/2004 5:29 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
>>>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12
>>>Avril 2004 06:59 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>From: Lionel
>>>>>Date: 4/11/2004 7:26 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>
>>>>>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12
>>>>>Avril 2004 03:43 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I find it funny that you would give up an alleged ski trip over the
>>>>>> weekend.
>>>>>No ski trip. By Saturday morning the temperature increased at 10 AM the
>>>>>snow was looking like jam. So we have done a 30 km tour in mountain
>>>>>bike. Muddy but very good.
>>>>>"Alleged ski trip" sounds like class envy... LOL
>>>>
>>>> No. Just seemed unlikely given your round the clock posts on RAO.
>>>
>>>For those who are interested and who like statistics :
>>>
>>>- S888Wheel contribution to RAO between the 2004/01/01 and 2004/03/31 is
>>>579 messages. Not necessary to precise that a minimum of 90% of these
>>>posts are extensively consacred to Arnold Krueger.
>>>- For the same period my contribution to RAO is 439 which means 24% less
>>>than him.
>>>
>>
>> Wow an enormous difference!. Idiot. You completely missed my point of
>> course. You had been posting regularly around the clock. You also have
>> been doing all kinds of searches. Just look at what you researched for
>> this post. One has to ask when were you even sleeping. Yours looks like
>> obsessive behavior.
>>
>>
>>>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his first message at : 00:03:55 PST
>>>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his last message at : 20:51:14 PST
>>>
>>>17 hours posting... In a normal day this mean that a normal guy have a
>>>maximum of 7 hours for working, sleeping, eating, washing, ****ing...
>>>purposes. LOL
>>
>> Having trouble with your math and basic logic once ahgain I see.
>
>Watch ot Google you have done your first post at 00:03:55 PST and your last
>one at 20:51:14 PST. 20 - 3 = 7
>It seems that you have proble with your math.

Do you have any idea how many different ways this is wrong?


>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> You
>>>> obviously didn't have time to ski and by your own admission you didn't
>>>> ski so I was just showing reasonable caution when I said "alleged." The
>>>> caution was obviously justified.
>>>
>>>You was surely informed that the wind will turn to South on the
>>>Mont-Mezenc by Saturday morning around 8 o'clock. ;-)
>>
>> No. I don't obsess over you. That is the sort of thing you do with me.
>> Kinda creepy. More and more like Arny every day.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> I don't ski by choice.
>>>
>>>I hate you and what you are by choice.
>>
>> So we have one more resident looser who suffers from the usual symptoms of
>> stupidity and class envy. You ought not to devote such energy towards me.
>> It is rather pathetic.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>>> to spend time doing research on this mess for the sake of trolling
>>>>>> on RAO. Now that makes for an interesting snapshot.
>>>>>
>>>>>It takes 5 minutes on Google you just have to enter "Marc Phillips" AND
>>>>>"pedophile" and you have about 420 answers.
>>>>
>>>> How much time did you spend reading those posts? Why didn't you do the
>>>> same search on Arny? So much for nonpartisanship. Did you do a search on
>>>> yourself and "pedophile?" Not interested in your own hypocricy?
>>>
>>>I didn't read all this garbage I just pick-up and excerpt of one message
>>>found on the first Google page. Estimated maximum time for a guy with a
>>>minimum Google skill : 2 minutes.
>>
>> Try the search on your name and pedophile and reflect on your own ****ed
>> up behavior for a while. That might be time well spent for a change.
>
>But you don't answer about your association with a criminal for your sordid
>delation project.

Sure I did. I pointed out your idiotic misunderstanding of what constitutes an
actual criminal. I do not associate with any known criminals. Now why don't you
do that search that says so much about your lack of character now?


>
>>>>>BTW the most interesting point for me was to see you, a venerable and
>>>>>respectable father of a respectable californian family, complotting with
>>>>>a "criminal" for *delation* purpose.
>>>>>*This* is what I call a curiosity.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Criminal \Crim"i*nal\, n.
>>>>> One who has commited a crime; especially, one who is found
>>>>> guilty by verdict, confession, or proof; a malefactor; a
>>>>> felon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If Marc is a criminal so are you. How does your family feel about your
>>>> selfproclaimed criminal behavior? By the way I don't think Marc is a
>>>> criminal so there is no dilema for me. So which is it? Are you a
>>>> criminal or a hypocrite and a liar? I know which one I think you are.
>>>
>>>I know that according to your standards I am a criminal and I confirm that
>>>I'm very proud of this compliment.
>>
>> Nice try at mind reading. You are an idiot and a hypocrite and a liar by
>> my standards. Just like Arny. You are too ****ing stupid to know the
>> difference between a civil suit and the pressing of criminal charges. I
>> have accused no one of any crime dip****. Nice to know you are proud of
>> your selfproclaimed criminal standing though. At least you have that to
>> brag about.
>>
>>
>>>I know that you use to listen music at home with Californian criminals,
>>>according to your standards and according to Californian law.
>>
>>
>> You obviosly don't know jack. You wonder why I call you an idiot?
>>
>>
>>>I know that you are complotting an act of delation with a californian
>>>criminal.
>>
>> You seem to live in a fantasy world full of criminals of your invention.
>> What does that say about you?
>>
>>
>>>Concerning my family information I am confident that you will collect all
>>>needed data for an extended and clean delation. You are proving that you
>>>and Marc Phillips have all the skill to do that. It's a job for
>>>specialists...
>>>LOL !
>>
>> Wow you are indeed the French Arny Krueger.
>
>You are the american Daladier believe me that's not better.

Are you admitting your status as the French Arny Krueger? One would think that
such a self-revelation would send one running to some sort of therapy or
rehabilitation of some sort.


>
>But speaking of Mr Arnold Krueger have you already read all the jokes that
>your friend and complice of delation Mr. Phillips has done in the past
>about Krueger's dead son (Nate).

I have read a few posts on that and I have voiced my objections.


>I regret that you don't like Google search because it was question of
>necrophilia, sodomy with a base-ball bat, pedophilia and etc...

I suppose your accusations that I raped my children were somehow acceptable
behavior in your mind. Hypocrite. I did voice my objections to Marc on those
posts. We disagree on what is an acceptable way to deal with the sociopath that
is Arny Krueger. Marc chose to fight fire with fire I chose to fight fire with
a lawsuit. Some people can disagree without turning ****ty like you.


>I know that you are an expert about insults magnitude (this is your word),
>because my moral fails please help us to rank Mr Phillips' insults on your
>magnitude scale.
>Thank you for your help...

I don't agree with his choice but I *understand* it. It is hard to deal with
sewage without getting some **** on themselves. I would think you already know
this.


>
>>>>>For the rest considering all the effort you have done to focalize the
>>>>>RAO attention on you, I have the right to request a minimum of gratitude
>>>>>from you.
>>>>
>>>> It is odd that you have chosen to obsess over me. Funny, I start threads
>>>> about audio related subjects and you start threads trolling me with more
>>>> false accusations of pedophilia. I think there in lies the true
>>>> reflections of each of us.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I put hereafter the prose of one of your famous supporter, you look more
>>>>>and more to the RAO "godfather" since most of your supporter should be
>>>>>in prison :
>>>>
>>>> You and Arny are hardly my supporters. The two of you seem to fit your
>>>> idea of criminals.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>[snip Art Sackman accusations of "necrophiliac pedophile"]
>>>
>>>>
>>>> All that research on RAO and you still come out looking like a
>>>> hypocrite. Good job!
>>>
>>>Yes according to your standards I am a hypocrite... I appreciate the
>>>compliment Mr Delator, sincerely. ;-)
>>
>> Yep. Unfortunately for you, my standards are pretty normal on the subject.
>
>LOL, you believe that because you are the only judge !

Wrong as usual.


>
>>>Delator \De*la"tor\, n. [L.]
>>> An accuser; an informer. [R.] --Howell.
>>
>> I'm sure you have one person agreeing with you. Good job again.
>
>Thank you. :o)
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Lionel]

S888Wheel wrote:

>>Date: 4/12/2004 8:37 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: >
>>
>>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12 Avril
>>2004 16:49 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Date: 4/12/2004 5:29 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>
>>>>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12
>>>>Avril 2004 06:59 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>From: Lionel
>>>>>>Date: 4/11/2004 7:26 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12
>>>>>>Avril 2004 03:43 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I find it funny that you would give up an alleged ski trip over the
>>>>>>>weekend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No ski trip. By Saturday morning the temperature increased at 10 AM the
>>>>>>snow was looking like jam. So we have done a 30 km tour in mountain
>>>>>>bike. Muddy but very good.
>>>>>>"Alleged ski trip" sounds like class envy... LOL
>>>>>
>>>>>No. Just seemed unlikely given your round the clock posts on RAO.
>>>>
>>>>For those who are interested and who like statistics :
>>>>
>>>>- S888Wheel contribution to RAO between the 2004/01/01 and 2004/03/31 is
>>>>579 messages. Not necessary to precise that a minimum of 90% of these
>>>>posts are extensively consacred to Arnold Krueger.
>>>>- For the same period my contribution to RAO is 439 which means 24% less
>>>>than him.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Wow an enormous difference!. Idiot. You completely missed my point of
>>>course. You had been posting regularly around the clock. You also have
>>>been doing all kinds of searches. Just look at what you researched for
>>>this post. One has to ask when were you even sleeping. Yours looks like
>>>obsessive behavior.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his first message at : 00:03:55 PST
>>>>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his last message at : 20:51:14 PST
>>>>
>>>>17 hours posting... In a normal day this mean that a normal guy have a
>>>>maximum of 7 hours for working, sleeping, eating, washing, ****ing...
>>>>purposes. LOL
>>>
>>>Having trouble with your math and basic logic once ahgain I see.
>>
>>Watch ot Google you have done your first post at 00:03:55 PST and your last
>>one at 20:51:14 PST. 20 - 3 = 7
>>It seems that you have proble with your math.
>
>
> Do you have any idea how many different ways this is wrong?

Who cares ?
You know how to manipulate numbers isn't it ?
the more interesting is not what numbers said, it's what people
believe... this is what you have done here above. ;-)

>>>>>You
>>>>>obviously didn't have time to ski and by your own admission you didn't
>>>>>ski so I was just showing reasonable caution when I said "alleged." The
>>>>>caution was obviously justified.
>>>>
>>>>You was surely informed that the wind will turn to South on the
>>>>Mont-Mezenc by Saturday morning around 8 o'clock. ;-)
>>>
>>>No. I don't obsess over you. That is the sort of thing you do with me.
>>>Kinda creepy. More and more like Arny every day.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>I don't ski by choice.
>>>>
>>>>I hate you and what you are by choice.
>>>
>>>So we have one more resident looser who suffers from the usual symptoms of
>>>stupidity and class envy. You ought not to devote such energy towards me.
>>>It is rather pathetic.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>to spend time doing research on this mess for the sake of trolling
>>>>>>>on RAO. Now that makes for an interesting snapshot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It takes 5 minutes on Google you just have to enter "Marc Phillips" AND
>>>>>>"pedophile" and you have about 420 answers.
>>>>>
>>>>>How much time did you spend reading those posts? Why didn't you do the
>>>>>same search on Arny? So much for nonpartisanship. Did you do a search on
>>>>>yourself and "pedophile?" Not interested in your own hypocricy?
>>>>
>>>>I didn't read all this garbage I just pick-up and excerpt of one message
>>>>found on the first Google page. Estimated maximum time for a guy with a
>>>>minimum Google skill : 2 minutes.
>>>
>>>Try the search on your name and pedophile and reflect on your own ****ed
>>>up behavior for a while. That might be time well spent for a change.
>>
>>But you don't answer about your association with a criminal for your sordid
>>delation project.
>
>
> Sure I did. I pointed out your idiotic misunderstanding of what constitutes an
> actual criminal. I do not associate with any known criminals. Now why don't you
> do that search that says so much about your lack of character now?
>
>
>
>>>>>>BTW the most interesting point for me was to see you, a venerable and
>>>>>>respectable father of a respectable californian family, complotting with
>>>>>>a "criminal" for *delation* purpose.
>>>>>>*This* is what I call a curiosity.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Criminal \Crim"i*nal\, n.
>>>>>> One who has commited a crime; especially, one who is found
>>>>>> guilty by verdict, confession, or proof; a malefactor; a
>>>>>> felon.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If Marc is a criminal so are you. How does your family feel about your
>>>>>selfproclaimed criminal behavior? By the way I don't think Marc is a
>>>>>criminal so there is no dilema for me. So which is it? Are you a
>>>>>criminal or a hypocrite and a liar? I know which one I think you are.
>>>>
>>>>I know that according to your standards I am a criminal and I confirm that
>>>>I'm very proud of this compliment.
>>>
>>>Nice try at mind reading. You are an idiot and a hypocrite and a liar by
>>>my standards. Just like Arny. You are too ****ing stupid to know the
>>>difference between a civil suit and the pressing of criminal charges. I
>>>have accused no one of any crime dip****. Nice to know you are proud of
>>>your selfproclaimed criminal standing though. At least you have that to
>>>brag about.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I know that you use to listen music at home with Californian criminals,
>>>>according to your standards and according to Californian law.
>>>
>>>
>>>You obviosly don't know jack. You wonder why I call you an idiot?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I know that you are complotting an act of delation with a californian
>>>>criminal.
>>>
>>>You seem to live in a fantasy world full of criminals of your invention.
>>>What does that say about you?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Concerning my family information I am confident that you will collect all
>>>>needed data for an extended and clean delation. You are proving that you
>>>>and Marc Phillips have all the skill to do that. It's a job for
>>>>specialists...
>>>>LOL !
>>>
>>>Wow you are indeed the French Arny Krueger.
>>
>>You are the american Daladier believe me that's not better.
>
> Are you admitting your status as the French Arny Krueger? One would think that
> such a self-revelation would send one running to some sort of therapy or
> rehabilitation of some sort.

Do you know who was Daladier ? ;-)

>>But speaking of Mr Arnold Krueger have you already read all the jokes that
>>your friend and complice of delation Mr. Phillips has done in the past
>>about Krueger's dead son (Nate).
>
>
> I have read a few posts on that and I have voiced my objections.
>
>
>
>>I regret that you don't like Google search because it was question of
>>necrophilia, sodomy with a base-ball bat, pedophilia and etc...
>
>
> I suppose your accusations that I raped my children were somehow acceptable
> behavior in your mind. Hypocrite. I did voice my objections to Marc on those
> posts. We disagree on what is an acceptable way to deal with the sociopath that
> is Arny Krueger. Marc chose to fight fire with fire I chose to fight fire with
> a lawsuit. Some people can disagree without turning ****ty like you.

So I confirm that I am acting like Marc I chose to fight fire with fire.
This is my error I don't understand why you are so angry.
You have insidiously insulted my father and I have chose to fight your
insult with insults.

Sincerely (I know you cannot be sincere but faith make me live...) I
officialy challenge you to find *one* insult to you that I would have
written before you have insulted my father.
You have obliged me to fight your fire with fire.


>>I know that you are an expert about insults magnitude (this is your word),
>>because my moral fails please help us to rank Mr Phillips' insults on your
>>magnitude scale.
>>Thank you for your help...
>
>
> I don't agree with his choice but I *understand* it. It is hard to deal with
> sewage without getting some **** on themselves. I would think you already know
> this.

When Mr. Phillips is in your house do your wife, your daughters know
that he has written such horrible words on a *public* NG ?
Are you ready to let your children read all this garbage ?
Don't you think that Mr Phillips should be sued according to Californian
law on libel ?

I'm afraid that you are not really an honest man Mr S888Wheel...


>>>>>>For the rest considering all the effort you have done to focalize the
>>>>>>RAO attention on you, I have the right to request a minimum of gratitude
>>>>>
>>>>>>from you.
>>>>>
>>>>>It is odd that you have chosen to obsess over me. Funny, I start threads
>>>>>about audio related subjects and you start threads trolling me with more
>>>>>false accusations of pedophilia. I think there in lies the true
>>>>>reflections of each of us.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I put hereafter the prose of one of your famous supporter, you look more
>>>>>>and more to the RAO "godfather" since most of your supporter should be
>>>>>>in prison :
>>>>>
>>>>>You and Arny are hardly my supporters. The two of you seem to fit your
>>>>>idea of criminals.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>[snip Art Sackman accusations of "necrophiliac pedophile"]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>All that research on RAO and you still come out looking like a
>>>>>hypocrite. Good job!
>>>>
>>>>Yes according to your standards I am a hypocrite... I appreciate the
>>>>compliment Mr Delator, sincerely. ;-)
>>>
>>>Yep. Unfortunately for you, my standards are pretty normal on the subject.
>>
>>LOL, you believe that because you are the only judge !
>
>
> Wrong as usual.

It will be difficult for you to prove the contrary, moreover if like you
I don't accept any proofs.

[S888Wheel]

>Date: 4/12/2004 11:09 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel wrote:
>
>>>Date: 4/12/2004 8:37 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
>>>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12 Avril
>>>2004 16:49 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Date: 4/12/2004 5:29 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>
>>>>>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12
>>>>>Avril 2004 06:59 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>From: Lionel
>>>>>>>Date: 4/11/2004 7:26 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12
>>>>>>>Avril 2004 03:43 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I find it funny that you would give up an alleged ski trip over the
>>>>>>>>weekend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No ski trip. By Saturday morning the temperature increased at 10 AM the
>>>>>>>snow was looking like jam. So we have done a 30 km tour in mountain
>>>>>>>bike. Muddy but very good.
>>>>>>>"Alleged ski trip" sounds like class envy... LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No. Just seemed unlikely given your round the clock posts on RAO.
>>>>>
>>>>>For those who are interested and who like statistics :
>>>>>
>>>>>- S888Wheel contribution to RAO between the 2004/01/01 and 2004/03/31 is
>>>>>579 messages. Not necessary to precise that a minimum of 90% of these
>>>>>posts are extensively consacred to Arnold Krueger.
>>>>>- For the same period my contribution to RAO is 439 which means 24% less
>>>>>than him.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Wow an enormous difference!. Idiot. You completely missed my point of
>>>>course. You had been posting regularly around the clock. You also have
>>>>been doing all kinds of searches. Just look at what you researched for
>>>>this post. One has to ask when were you even sleeping. Yours looks like
>>>>obsessive behavior.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his first message at : 00:03:55 PST
>>>>>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his last message at : 20:51:14 PST
>>>>>
>>>>>17 hours posting... In a normal day this mean that a normal guy have a
>>>>>maximum of 7 hours for working, sleeping, eating, washing, ****ing...
>>>>>purposes. LOL
>>>>
>>>>Having trouble with your math and basic logic once ahgain I see.
>>>
>>>Watch ot Google you have done your first post at 00:03:55 PST and your last
>>>one at 20:51:14 PST. 20 - 3 = 7
>>>It seems that you have proble with your math.
>>
>>
>> Do you have any idea how many different ways this is wrong?
>
>Who cares ?

That pretty much says it all. You try to make some sort of point but you don't
realy care if your citations support your point. They don't. You don't care
though. Is that intelectual laziness or more hypocricy?


>You know how to manipulate numbers isn't it ?

I have a pretty good idea how to interpret them. You obviously don't or you
might actually understand how the numbers fail in every way to support your
point.


>the more interesting is not what numbers said, it's what people
>believe... this is what you have done here above. ;-)

What the people believe? Who do you think you have convinced of anything on
this issue?


>
>>>>>>You
>>>>>>obviously didn't have time to ski and by your own admission you didn't
>>>>>>ski so I was just showing reasonable caution when I said "alleged." The
>>>>>>caution was obviously justified.
>>>>>
>>>>>You was surely informed that the wind will turn to South on the
>>>>>Mont-Mezenc by Saturday morning around 8 o'clock. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>No. I don't obsess over you. That is the sort of thing you do with me.
>>>>Kinda creepy. More and more like Arny every day.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>I don't ski by choice.
>>>>>
>>>>>I hate you and what you are by choice.
>>>>
>>>>So we have one more resident looser who suffers from the usual symptoms of
>>>>stupidity and class envy. You ought not to devote such energy towards me.
>>>>It is rather pathetic.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>to spend time doing research on this mess for the sake of trolling
>>>>>>>>on RAO. Now that makes for an interesting snapshot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It takes 5 minutes on Google you just have to enter "Marc Phillips" AND
>>>>>>>"pedophile" and you have about 420 answers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>How much time did you spend reading those posts? Why didn't you do the
>>>>>>same search on Arny? So much for nonpartisanship. Did you do a search on
>>>>>>yourself and "pedophile?" Not interested in your own hypocricy?
>>>>>
>>>>>I didn't read all this garbage I just pick-up and excerpt of one message
>>>>>found on the first Google page. Estimated maximum time for a guy with a
>>>>>minimum Google skill : 2 minutes.
>>>>
>>>>Try the search on your name and pedophile and reflect on your own ****ed
>>>>up behavior for a while. That might be time well spent for a change.
>>>
>>>But you don't answer about your association with a criminal for your sordid
>>>delation project.
>>
>>
>> Sure I did. I pointed out your idiotic misunderstanding of what constitutes
>an
>> actual criminal. I do not associate with any known criminals. Now why don't
>you
>> do that search that says so much about your lack of character now?
>>

Guess you don't want to face the music on that one. Your research is much like
that of a creationist. A lot of work to prove a preconcieved conclusion with no
interest in the truth.


>>
>>
>>>>>>>BTW the most interesting point for me was to see you, a venerable and
>>>>>>>respectable father of a respectable californian family, complotting
>with
>>>>>>>a "criminal" for *delation* purpose.
>>>>>>>*This* is what I call a curiosity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Criminal \Crim"i*nal\, n.
>>>>>>> One who has commited a crime; especially, one who is found
>>>>>>> guilty by verdict, confession, or proof; a malefactor; a
>>>>>>> felon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If Marc is a criminal so are you. How does your family feel about your
>>>>>>selfproclaimed criminal behavior? By the way I don't think Marc is a
>>>>>>criminal so there is no dilema for me. So which is it? Are you a
>>>>>>criminal or a hypocrite and a liar? I know which one I think you are.
>>>>>
>>>>>I know that according to your standards I am a criminal and I confirm
>that
>>>>>I'm very proud of this compliment.
>>>>
>>>>Nice try at mind reading. You are an idiot and a hypocrite and a liar by
>>>>my standards. Just like Arny. You are too ****ing stupid to know the
>>>>difference between a civil suit and the pressing of criminal charges. I
>>>>have accused no one of any crime dip****. Nice to know you are proud of
>>>>your selfproclaimed criminal standing though. At least you have that to
>>>>brag about.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I know that you use to listen music at home with Californian criminals,
>>>>>according to your standards and according to Californian law.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You obviosly don't know jack. You wonder why I call you an idiot?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I know that you are complotting an act of delation with a californian
>>>>>criminal.
>>>>
>>>>You seem to live in a fantasy world full of criminals of your invention.
>>>>What does that say about you?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Concerning my family information I am confident that you will collect all
>>>>>needed data for an extended and clean delation. You are proving that you
>>>>>and Marc Phillips have all the skill to do that. It's a job for
>>>>>specialists...
>>>>>LOL !
>>>>
>>>>Wow you are indeed the French Arny Krueger.
>>>
>>>You are the american Daladier believe me that's not better.
>>
>> Are you admitting your status as the French Arny Krueger? One would think
>that
>> such a self-revelation would send one running to some sort of therapy or
>> rehabilitation of some sort.
>
>Do you know who was Daladier ? ;-)

No. I don't really care. You have already falsely accused me of raping my own
children. I see no reason to suspect your lies about me to be any different in
nature now.


>
>>>But speaking of Mr Arnold Krueger have you already read all the jokes that
>>>your friend and complice of delation Mr. Phillips has done in the past
>>>about Krueger's dead son (Nate).
>>
>>
>> I have read a few posts on that and I have voiced my objections.
>>
>>
>>
>>>I regret that you don't like Google search because it was question of
>>>necrophilia, sodomy with a base-ball bat, pedophilia and etc...
>>
>>
>> I suppose your accusations that I raped my children were somehow acceptable
>> behavior in your mind. Hypocrite. I did voice my objections to Marc on
>those
>> posts. We disagree on what is an acceptable way to deal with the sociopath
>that
>> is Arny Krueger. Marc chose to fight fire with fire I chose to fight fire
>with
>> a lawsuit. Some people can disagree without turning ****ty like you.
>

>So I confirm that I am acting like Marc I chose to fight fire with fire.
>This is my error I don't understand why you are so angry.

I'm sorry you lack the smarts or perspective to see the differences.


>You have insidiously insulted my father and I have chose to fight your
>insult with insults.

Bull****. If you think my comment that I am not interested in what your father
had to say because the only thing I know about him was that he raised at least
one idiot is on a par with accusations of pedophilia and the raping of one's
children then you have some serious psychological and moral problems. I guess
you cannot see the profound meglamania that oozes from your skewed perspective
on this issue.


>
>Sincerely (I know you cannot be sincere but faith make me live...)

Projecting again I see.

I
>officialy challenge you to find *one* insult to you that I would have
>written before you have insulted my father.
>You have obliged me to fight your fire with fire.

It would be easy but why should I bother? I already know you are full of ****
and are lacking in any moral character.


>
>
>>>I know that you are an expert about insults magnitude (this is your word),
>>>because my moral fails please help us to rank Mr Phillips' insults on your
>>>magnitude scale.
>>>Thank you for your help...
>>
>>
>> I don't agree with his choice but I *understand* it. It is hard to deal
>with
>> sewage without getting some **** on themselves. I would think you already
>know
>> this.
>
>When Mr. Phillips is in your house do your wife, your daughters know
>that he has written such horrible words on a *public* NG ?

Oh, my wife was awre of the flame wars on RAO. She refers to Arny as Freddy
Krueger. She can't remember his real name and that character is all that comes
to mind.


>Are you ready to let your children read all this garbage ?

I wouldn't let any child read your posts about me. They are sick lies.


>Don't you think that Mr Phillips should be sued according to Californian
>law on libel ?

That would be up to Arny. Of course given all his libelous comments about Marc
he wouldn't dare file such a suit. Are you not smart enough to know that it is
up to the person being libeled to decide whether or not to file a libel
lawsuit?


>
>I'm afraid that you are not really an honest man Mr S888Wheel...


I am quite honest actually. You are just amazingly confused about and ignorant
of the issue at hand.
>
>
>>>>>>>For the rest considering all the effort you have done to focalize the
>>>>>>>RAO attention on you, I have the right to request a minimum of
>gratitude
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>from you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It is odd that you have chosen to obsess over me. Funny, I start threads
>>>>>>about audio related subjects and you start threads trolling me with more
>>>>>>false accusations of pedophilia. I think there in lies the true
>>>>>>reflections of each of us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I put hereafter the prose of one of your famous supporter, you look
>more
>>>>>>>and more to the RAO "godfather" since most of your supporter should be
>>>>>>>in prison :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You and Arny are hardly my supporters. The two of you seem to fit your
>>>>>>idea of criminals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>[snip Art Sackman accusations of "necrophiliac pedophile"]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>All that research on RAO and you still come out looking like a
>>>>>>hypocrite. Good job!
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes according to your standards I am a hypocrite... I appreciate the
>>>>>compliment Mr Delator, sincerely. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>Yep. Unfortunately for you, my standards are pretty normal on the subject.
>>>
>>>LOL, you believe that because you are the only judge !
>>
>>
>> Wrong as usual.
>
>It will be difficult for you to prove the contrary, moreover if like you
>I don't accept any proofs.

Wrong again. You are consistant.
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel said:

>Watch ot Google you have done your first post at 00:03:55 PST and your last
>one at 20:51:14 PST. 20 - 3 = 7
>It seems that you have proble with your math.
>

It seems that you have a "Proble" with your math. 20 - 3 = 17, dip****.

By the way, Scott refers to you as the French Arny. I prefer to think of you
as the French Bill Watkins...dumb as a bag of rocks, and utterly unable to
support your idiotic claims with any semblance of logic or reason. Of course
you win extra stupidity points for remaining so long on a forum where you can
neither read nor write the language. You gotta be a moron to do that.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

S888Wheel said:

>>But speaking of Mr Arnold Krueger have you already read all the jokes that
>>your friend and complice of delation Mr. Phillips has done in the past
>>about Krueger's dead son (Nate).

>I have read a few posts on that and I have voiced my objections.
>

I have never done any jokes about Nate, and I've voiced my objections about
others doing it, too.

Lionel's blantant lies here do indeed confirm him as the French Arny Krueger.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel said:

>When Mr. Phillips is in your house do your wife, your daughters know
>that he has written such horrible words on a *public* NG ?
>Are you ready to let your children read all this garbage ?

What horrible words? If anything, his family should feel safe in my presence,
because I've taken a stand against pedophilia, and have tried to get a known
pederast off of this forum. It's YOU they should be nervous around, since you
support Arny and his perverted behavior. That makes you an accomplice, which
is illegal in this country.

In addition, you have threatened to rape me on several occasions, which makes
you an Internet sexual predator.

So tell me again about this alleged moral superiority of yours.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel said:

>But you don't answer to my question. Does she know Mr Phillips' "Dead Nate
>jokes" ?
>

There aren't any "Mr Phillips' 'Dead Nate Jokes,'" dumb****.

Boon

[S888Wheel]

>Date: 4/12/2004 2:14 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - lundi 12 Avril
>2004 20:31 wrote:
>
>>>>>>>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his first message at : 00:03:55 PST
>>>>>>>On 2004-04-09 S888Wheel has posted his last message at : 20:51:14 PST
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>17 hours posting... In a normal day this mean that a normal guy have a
>>>>>>>maximum of 7 hours for working, sleeping, eating, washing, ****ing...
>>>>>>>purposes. LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Having trouble with your math and basic logic once ahgain I see.
>>>>>
>>>>>Watch ot Google you have done your first post at 00:03:55 PST and your
>>>>>last one at 20:51:14 PST. 20 - 3 = 7
>>>>>It seems that you have proble with your math.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any idea how many different ways this is wrong?
>>>
>>>Who cares ?
>>
>> That pretty much says it all. You try to make some sort of point but you
>> don't realy care if your citations support your point. They don't. You
>> don't care though. Is that intelectual laziness or more hypocricy?
>
>Fifty-fifty. :-(
>
>>>You know how to manipulate numbers isn't it ?
>>
>> I have a pretty good idea how to interpret them. You obviously don't or
>> you might actually understand how the numbers fail in every way to support
>> your point.
>
>[snip]
>
>> Guess you don't want to face the music on that one. Your research is much
>> like that of a creationist. A lot of work to prove a preconcieved
>> conclusion with no interest in the truth.
>
>[snip]
>
>> Now why don't you do that search that says so much about your lack of
>>character now?
>
>How to search alone about "a lack of character" ?

Are you just playing stupid or are you really this stupid? I specifically told
you the search should include your name and the word pedophile for a quick
review of your vicious lies about me. They show your true character.


>What would be my referential ?

See above. You could include the word rape since you have often falsely accused
me of raping my own children.


>I imagine you understand that it's an impossible mission that you're asking
>for.

Not for anyone who can follow a thread. Is that really over your head?


>The only strong referential I had was my father and since you aren't
>interested in what he was saying, I haven't anymore.

You are very sensitive about him. I suggest you leave him out of RAO less you
risk further hurt feelings. It is very tempting to once again say he failed,
but I won't. You will probably loose it again. We all know how ugly that can
be.


>Have you a solution to this problem ?

Yeah, try to remember what has already been said in these threads.


>
>[snip]
>
>>>Do you know who was Daladier ? ;-)
>>
>> No. I don't really care. You have already falsely accused me of raping my
>> own children. I see no reason to suspect your lies about me to be any
>> different in nature now.
>
>He was a specialist of delation.
>
>>>>>But speaking of Mr Arnold Krueger have you already read all the jokes
>>>>>that your friend and complice of delation Mr. Phillips has done in the
>>>>>past about Krueger's dead son (Nate).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have read a few posts on that and I have voiced my objections.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I regret that you don't like Google search because it was question of
>>>>>necrophilia, sodomy with a base-ball bat, pedophilia and etc...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I suppose your accusations that I raped my children were somehow
>>>> acceptable behavior in your mind. Hypocrite. I did voice my objections
>>>> to Marc on
>>>those
>>>> posts. We disagree on what is an acceptable way to deal with the
>>>> sociopath
>>>that
>>>> is Arny Krueger. Marc chose to fight fire with fire I chose to fight
>>>> fire
>>>with
>>>> a lawsuit. Some people can disagree without turning ****ty like you.
>>>
>>
>>>So I confirm that I am acting like Marc I chose to fight fire with fire.
>>>This is my error I don't understand why you are so angry.
>>
>> I'm sorry you lack the smarts or perspective to see the differences.
>
>Is there any differences ?

Yes.


>
>>>You have insidiously insulted my father and I have chose to fight your
>>>insult with insults.
>>
>> Bull****. If you think my comment that I am not interested in what your
>> father had to say because the only thing I know about him was that he
>> raised at least one idiot is on a par with accusations of pedophilia and
>> the raping of one's children then you have some serious psychological and
>> moral problems. I guess you cannot see the profound meglamania that oozes
>> from your skewed perspective on this issue.
>
>Mr S888Wheel I'm not joking anymore but I don't understand "meglamania".

Perhaps because I spelled it so badly. Here is the proper spelling and
definition.
Main Entry: meg·a·lo·ma·nia
Pronunciation: "me-g&-lO-'mA-nE-&, -ny&
Function: noun
Etymology: New Latin
Date: circa 1890
1 : a mania for great or grandiose performance
2 : a delusional mental disorder that is marked by infantile feelings of
personal omnipotence and grandeur


>BTW I have hereafter challanged you to find any insults from me before that
>you have insulted my family and you hereafter refuse.
>"Is that intelectual laziness or more hypocricy?" ;-)

I suppose one could call it lazyiness. I just don't think it is worth the
effort. Is there any chance that I can persuade you that you have been a
hypocrite and an idiot over everything? If not there is no point in accepting
your challenge, as easy as it would be to meet.


>
>
>>>Sincerely (I know you cannot be sincere but faith make me live...)
>>
>> Projecting again I see.
>>
>> I
>>>officialy challenge you to find *one* insult to you that I would have
>>>written before you have insulted my father.
>>>You have obliged me to fight your fire with fire.
>>
>> It would be easy but why should I bother? I already know you are full of
>> **** and are lacking in any moral character.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>I know that you are an expert about insults magnitude (this is your
>>>>>word), because my moral fails please help us to rank Mr Phillips'
>>>>>insults on your magnitude scale.
>>>>>Thank you for your help...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't agree with his choice but I *understand* it. It is hard to deal
>>>with
>>>> sewage without getting some **** on themselves. I would think you
>>>> already
>>>know
>>>> this.
>>>
>>>When Mr. Phillips is in your house do your wife, your daughters know
>>>that he has written such horrible words on a *public* NG ?
>>
>> Oh, my wife was awre of the flame wars on RAO. She refers to Arny as
>> Freddy Krueger. She can't remember his real name and that character is all
>> that comes to mind.
>
>But you don't answer to my question. Does she know Mr Phillips' "Dead Nate
>jokes" ?

What jokes would that be? But, no, she doesn't know any such jokes from anyone.
She is not terribly interested in RAO. Does your wife know about your false
accusations gainst me of pedophilia and the rape of my children?


>
>>
>>
>>>Are you ready to let your children read all this garbage ?
>>
>> I wouldn't let any child read your posts about me. They are sick lies.
>
>I hope so, this proves that you can still be rescued.

Glad to see you wouldn't want me to show any child some of your posts. Perhaps
there is hope for you as well. Does this mean you are aware of how sick and
immoral those posts of yours were?


>But you don't answer to my question. Would you like that your daughters read
>some of the Mr Phillips' "Dead Nate jokes".

Assuming Mr. Phillips made dead Nate jokes the answer is no. He claims not to
have done so. I remember taking issue with something he said on the subject but
I don't remember if it was a joke specifically. Does that bother you that I had
Marc in my house? Since you agree that it would be wrong for me to show your
posts to any child does that mean you think it would be a mistake to allow you
into my house near my family? Or are you above the rules of morality?




>
>>>Don't you think that Mr Phillips should be sued according to Californian
>>>law on libel ?
>>
>> That would be up to Arny. Of course given all his libelous comments about
>> Marc he wouldn't dare file such a suit. Are you not smart enough to know
>> that it is up to the person being libeled to decide whether or not to file
>> a libel lawsuit?
>
>Yes, I know that Arnold Krueger is the only decider about lawsuit or not
>lawsuit.

Then why ask me if I think Marc should be sued by Arny? But anyways I answered.
I think it wold be foolish since he is so guilty of the same thing.


>But I imagine that if you have been subject to "Dead Nate jokes" from an
>*American* RAO contributor you would have sued him. Yes ?

If Marc had made false accusations against me of that nature I certainly would
have. The difference is simple. My hands are clean. I have never made any dead
Nate jokes and have only voiced objections to them. I have never called Arny a
pedophile. His attack was unprovoked. Given the fact that Arny has made such an
unprovoked attack on me I see no reason to believe it was any different with
Marc. I think Marc simply chose a different responce. He fought fire with fire.
Arny called me a pedophile without provocation. Can you cite Marc calling
anyone a pedophile without provocation?


>
>>>I'm afraid that you are not really an honest man Mr S888Wheel...
>>
>>
>> I am quite honest actually. You are just amazingly confused about and
>> ignorant of the issue at hand.
>
>Do you authorize me to inform Mrs S888Wheel about Mr Marc Phillips' "Dead
>Nate Jokes" ?
>I will only provide her some links, nothing else I promise.

I think I have told you a few times to stay away from my wife in any way shape
or form. If that wasn't clear then hopefully this will make it so.
>
>
>>>>>>>>>For the rest considering all the effort you have done to focalize
>>>>>>>>>the RAO attention on you, I have the right to request a minimum of
>>>gratitude
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>from you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It is odd that you have chosen to obsess over me. Funny, I start
>>>>>>>>threads about audio related subjects and you start threads trolling
>>>>>>>>me with more false accusations of pedophilia. I think there in lies
>>>>>>>>the true reflections of each of us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I put hereafter the prose of one of your famous supporter, you look
>>>more
>>>>>>>>>and more to the RAO "godfather" since most of your supporter should
>>>>>>>>>be in prison :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You and Arny are hardly my supporters. The two of you seem to fit
>>>>>>>>your idea of criminals.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[snip Art Sackman accusations of "necrophiliac pedophile"]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>All that research on RAO and you still come out looking like a
>>>>>>>>hypocrite. Good job!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yes according to your standards I am a hypocrite... I appreciate the
>>>>>>>compliment Mr Delator, sincerely. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yep. Unfortunately for you, my standards are pretty normal on the
>>>>>>subject.
>>>>>
>>>>>LOL, you believe that because you are the only judge !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wrong as usual.
>>>
>>>It will be difficult for you to prove the contrary, moreover if like you
>>>I don't accept any proofs.
>>
>> Wrong again. You are consistant.
>
>Which proofs are you able to provide to support the above ? A psychologist
>report ? A baptism certificate ? A petition ? A sport licence ? A library
>card or a swimming pool subscription? ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Marc Phillips]

S888Wheel said:

>Assuming Mr. Phillips made dead Nate jokes the answer is no. He claims not to
>have done so. I remember taking issue with something he said on the subject
>but
>I don't remember if it was a joke specifically.

I actually just went into Google and typed in "Nate," with me as the auther. I
got 40 matches. Most of them were my objections to Arny bringing up Nate in an
argument. A few of them were asking Arny to show where I had made "horrific
comments" about his death, a claim he made and never supported. And then the
rest seemed to be posts where I mentioned nothing about Nate, but I had
included responses from others who had mentioned him.

Not a Dead Nate joke in the bunch. I've always strenuously objected to
mentioning Nate in this forum, because I, as a father, found it too out of
line. Arny, however, chose to attack me for making Nate jokes when I had gone
out of my way to avoid the issue, and when I objected, he said I made "horrific
comments" because the mere mention of Nate was upsetting and horrific to him.
Of course it took him several weeks to come up with that twisted monstrosity of
an idea.

In fact, as a primer for anyone new, and for anyone who's forgotten, I chase
Arny around RAO because he did what I just mentioned, because he insinuated
that I cheated in the Aloia amp contest, and because exposed himself as a
pedophile right here. If anyone still thinks I'm a bad guy after a casual trip
through the Google archives, then they are either one of Arny's sockpuppets, or
they have been paid to do think the way they do. There is no reason for a
normal person to think that Arny is anything other than a twisted, demented
individual who should not have access to the Internet.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

I said:

>I actually just went into Google and typed in "Nate," with me as the auther.

Before Arny tries to slide into this exchange, the word is "author."

Boon

[S888Wheel]

>Date: 4/12/2004 4:50 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13 Avril
>2004 00:07 wrote:
>
>>>How to search alone about "a lack of character" ?
>>
>> Are you just playing stupid or are you really this stupid? I specifically
>> told you the search should include your name and the word pedophile for a
>> quick review of your vicious lies about me. They show your true character.
>
>Sorry I haven't understood.
>
>>>What would be my referential ?
>>
>> See above. You could include the word rape since you have often falsely
>> accused me of raping my own children.
>
>Ok noted see above.

Now that you understand have you bothered to do the search to take a good hard
look at your behavior? If so are you proud of it?


>
>>>I imagine you understand that it's an impossible mission that you're
>>>asking for.
>>
>> Not for anyone who can follow a thread. Is that really over your head?
>
>What I have told was stupid and not really important. in the end it hasn't a
>lot of importance.
>I have just fight the fire with fire this is a tactic I have learnt from one
>of your friend. :o)

Nice attempt to dodge responsibility. Do you really think that what I said
about your father, that I wasn't interested in his opinion.... really is on an
equal par to your false accusations of pedophilia and the rape of my own
children? If so you are indeed a meglomaniac with a very skewed sense of right
and wrong. Just an opinion.


>
>>>The only strong referential I had was my father and since you aren't
>>>interested in what he was saying, I haven't anymore.
>>
>> You are very sensitive about him. I suggest you leave him out of RAO less
>> you risk further hurt feelings.
>
>This is not your problem and as you have been informed now and as you are a
>*smart* guy I'm sure that you will not make the same error anymore.

I will if I feel like it. You crossed the line when you falsely accused me of
raping my own children. That makes you scum. Your feeling do not matter to me.
You do not matter to me. So long as those posts remain on RAO you are **** on
the bottom of my shoe, not worthy of any considerations. Do you understand
this? Would you feel any different about anyone who accused you of raping your
own children?


>For the others I will manage that case after case.
>
>Case \Case\, n. [F. cas, fr. L. casus, fr. cadere to fall, to
> happen. Cf. Chance.]
> 2. That which befalls, comes, or happens; an event; an
> instance; a circumstance, or all the circumstances;
> condition; state of things; affair; as, a strange case; a
> case of injustice; the case of the Indian tribes.
>
>> It is very tempting to once again say he
>> failed, but I won't. You will probably loose it again. We all know how
>> ugly that can be.
>
>So I will not say that Mrs S888Wheel failed to take care of your daughters
>virginity. Smart no ?

But you have many times. Scum.


>
>>>Have you a solution to this problem ?
>>
>> Yeah, try to remember what has already been said in these threads.
>
>If you promise me to do the same.

What is the value of a promise made by scum? I will do as I please with no
consideration for you as long as your posts containing false accusations of
pedophilia and the rape of my own children remain on the RAO archives.

>
>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>>>Do you know who was Daladier ? ;-)
>>>>
>>>> No. I don't really care. You have already falsely accused me of raping
>>>> my own children. I see no reason to suspect your lies about me to be any
>>>> different in nature now.
>>>
>>>He was a specialist of delation.
>>>
>>>>>>>But speaking of Mr Arnold Krueger have you already read all the jokes
>>>>>>>that your friend and complice of delation Mr. Phillips has done in the
>>>>>>>past about Krueger's dead son (Nate).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have read a few posts on that and I have voiced my objections.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I regret that you don't like Google search because it was question of
>>>>>>>necrophilia, sodomy with a base-ball bat, pedophilia and etc...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suppose your accusations that I raped my children were somehow
>>>>>> acceptable behavior in your mind. Hypocrite. I did voice my objections
>>>>>> to Marc on
>>>>>those
>>>>>> posts. We disagree on what is an acceptable way to deal with the
>>>>>> sociopath
>>>>>that
>>>>>> is Arny Krueger. Marc chose to fight fire with fire I chose to fight
>>>>>> fire
>>>>>with
>>>>>> a lawsuit. Some people can disagree without turning ****ty like you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>So I confirm that I am acting like Marc I chose to fight fire with fire.
>>>>>This is my error I don't understand why you are so angry.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry you lack the smarts or perspective to see the differences.
>>>
>>>Is there any differences ?
>>
>> Yes.
>
>Agree I'm really nicer than Marc Phillips. ;o)

Guess again.


>
>>>>>You have insidiously insulted my father and I have chose to fight your
>>>>>insult with insults.
>>>>
>>>> Bull****. If you think my comment that I am not interested in what your
>>>> father had to say because the only thing I know about him was that he
>>>> raised at least one idiot is on a par with accusations of pedophilia and
>>>> the raping of one's children then you have some serious psychological
>>>> and moral problems. I guess you cannot see the profound meglamania that
>>>> oozes from your skewed perspective on this issue.
>>>
>>>Mr S888Wheel I'm not joking anymore but I don't understand "meglamania".
>>
>> Perhaps because I spelled it so badly. Here is the proper spelling and
>> definition.
>> Main Entry: meg·a·lo·ma·nia
>> Pronunciation: "me-g&-lO-'mA-nE-&, -ny&
>> Function: noun
>> Etymology: New Latin
>> Date: circa 1890
>> 1 : a mania for great or grandiose performance
>> 2 : a delusional mental disorder that is marked by infantile feelings of
>> personal omnipotence and grandeur
>
>If you are explaining me that you have been megaloniac with your scornful
>and comptemptuous insulting words for my father I am 100% agree with you

I realize that English is your second language so I can see how you can make
such a simple mistake. Feel free to review the post and see just who I was
talking about. Hint, it was you. Was that too much of a hint? Or not enough?


>
>>>BTW I have hereafter challanged you to find any insults from me before
>>>that you have insulted my family and you hereafter refuse.
>>>"Is that intelectual laziness or more hypocricy?" ;-)
>>
>> I suppose one could call it lazyiness. I just don't think it is worth the
>> effort. Is there any chance that I can persuade you that you have been a
>> hypocrite and an idiot over everything? If not there is no point in
>> accepting your challenge, as easy as it would be to meet.
>
>Sorry but it's not an answer just an escape.

Wrong

It's not really courageous from
>you. But I will not insist.
>
>>>>>Sincerely (I know you cannot be sincere but faith make me live...)
>>>>
>>>> Projecting again I see.
>>>>
>>>> I
>>>>>officialy challenge you to find *one* insult to you that I would have
>>>>>written before you have insulted my father.
>>>>>You have obliged me to fight your fire with fire.
>>>>
>>>> It would be easy but why should I bother? I already know you are full of
>>>> **** and are lacking in any moral character.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>I know that you are an expert about insults magnitude (this is your
>>>>>>>word), because my moral fails please help us to rank Mr Phillips'
>>>>>>>insults on your magnitude scale.
>>>>>>>Thank you for your help...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't agree with his choice but I *understand* it. It is hard to
>>>>>> deal
>>>>>with
>>>>>> sewage without getting some **** on themselves. I would think you
>>>>>> already
>>>>>know
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>>When Mr. Phillips is in your house do your wife, your daughters know
>>>>>that he has written such horrible words on a *public* NG ?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, my wife was awre of the flame wars on RAO. She refers to Arny as
>>>> Freddy Krueger. She can't remember his real name and that character is
>>>> all that comes to mind.
>>>
>>>But you don't answer to my question. Does she know Mr Phillips' "Dead Nate
>>>jokes" ?
>>
>> What jokes would that be? But, no, she doesn't know any such jokes from
>> anyone. She is not terribly interested in RAO. Does your wife know about
>> your false accusations gainst me of pedophilia and the rape of my
>> children?
>
>I know her since the primary school. As she is not as stupid than me I
>suppose that she is aware of what I can do and/or say.
>In the present case to be honest I haven't informed her of our exchanges but
>I would not care that she learn all the story. She was loving my father.
>Do you want her private mail ?

Do you want me to email her with copies of your posts?


>
>>>>>Are you ready to let your children read all this garbage ?
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't let any child read your posts about me. They are sick lies.
>>>
>>>I hope so, this proves that you can still be rescued.
>>
>> Glad to see you wouldn't want me to show any child some of your posts.
>> Perhaps there is hope for you as well. Does this mean you are aware of how
>> sick and immoral those posts of yours were?
>
>I perfectly know that I am immoral, perverse, cheater, hypocrite. I know
>that and it's my main advantage over you. ;-)

Agreed


>
>>>But you don't answer to my question. Would you like that your daughters
>>>read some of the Mr Phillips' "Dead Nate jokes".
>>
>> Assuming Mr. Phillips made dead Nate jokes the answer is no. He claims not
>> to have done so. I remember taking issue with something he said on the
>> subject but I don't remember if it was a joke specifically. Does that
>> bother you that I had Marc in my house? Since you agree that it would be
>> wrong for me to show your posts to any child does that mean you think it
>> would be a mistake to allow you into my house near my family? Or are you
>> above the rules of morality?
>
>I am not. Based on this I'm not a recommendable frequentation neither for
>you nor for your wife and obviously not for your children...
>...Like Marc Phillips. :o)

I'll accept your warning about you due to your lack of moral character. Like I
said, Marc claims to have objected to jokes about Arny's son and his passing. I
see you have not responded to his challenges to your accustaions. Given your
proven tendency to make false accusations, it seems you are just doing the same
to Marc. Did you really threaten to rape him as he claims? That is pretty
serious stuff.


>
>>>>>Don't you think that Mr Phillips should be sued according to Californian
>>>>>law on libel ?
>>>>
>>>> That would be up to Arny. Of course given all his libelous comments
>>>> about Marc he wouldn't dare file such a suit. Are you not smart enough
>>>> to know that it is up to the person being libeled to decide whether or
>>>> not to file a libel lawsuit?
>>>
>>>Yes, I know that Arnold Krueger is the only decider about lawsuit or not
>>>lawsuit.
>>
>> Then why ask me if I think Marc should be sued by Arny? But anyways I
>> answered. I think it wold be foolish since he is so guilty of the same
>> thing.
>
>I'm 50% agree with you.
>
>>>But I imagine that if you have been subject to "Dead Nate jokes" from an
>>>*American* RAO contributor you would have sued him. Yes ?
>>
>> If Marc had made false accusations against me of that nature I certainly
>> would have.
>
>I'm better understanding you now.
>
>> The difference is simple. My hands are clean. I have never
>> made any dead Nate jokes and have only voiced objections to them. I have
>> never called Arny a pedophile. His attack was unprovoked.
>
>I'm 100% agree with you here
>
>> Given the fact
>> that Arny has made such an unprovoked attack on me I see no reason to
>> believe it was any different with Marc.
>
>I cannot be agree with you here this is pure speculation if you cannot bring
>any tangible fact to your argumentation.

I did bring a tangeble fact, their histories with me on RAO. That is evidence.
Besides their fight is not my fight. When they start exchanging accusations of
pedophilia I don't jump in and take sides. never noticed that?


>
>speculation
> n 1: a message expressing an opinion based on incomplete evidence

Yes it is speculation. Some people make a living speculating. If I had to wager
it would be an easy call.


>
>> I think Marc simply chose a
>> different responce.
>
>I know it's the same I have chosen.

Except I never called you a pedophile or accused you of necrophilia with your
own child.This is what you believe about Marc. So you have not made the same
choice based on the same circumstances. You went balistic over an insult that
barely involved your father. You over reacted. Honestly if you think that my
comment that sent you over the edge was the moral equivilent of your
accusations of pedophilia and the rape of my own children you are completely
out of line with common moral beliefs. If I equated the two I never would have
made the comment. I thought it was no big deal. There is no questioning the
mallace behind Arny's false accusations against me of pedophilia and there is
no question about your mallice in your false accusations against me of raping
my own children. No such mallace existed in my comment regarding your father.
If I thought it were the moral equivilent of a false accusation of pedophilia I
never would have said it. I think it is a case of your personal sensitiviies
being completely out of line with the norm. That isn't my fault.


>
>> He fought fire with fire.
>
>This is what I have done.

I disagree. I think your reaction was much like that of GW Bush with Arab
nations. I know how you feel about that.


>
>> Arny called me a pedophile
>> without provocation.
>
>I'm 100% agree with you.
>
>> Can you cite Marc calling anyone a pedophile without
>> provocation?
>
>Have you seen me accusing you of raping your daughters without provocation ?
>The answer is no !

The answer is yes. What you consider reasonable provocation is clearly not
reasonable and completely off the normal standard.

>
>>>Do you authorize me to inform Mrs S888Wheel about Mr Marc Phillips' "Dead
>>>Nate Jokes" ?
>>>I will only provide her some links, nothing else I promise.
>>
>> I think I have told you a few times to stay away from my wife in any way
>> shape or form. If that wasn't clear then hopefully this will make it so.
>
>I think that I will finish to love you as a father. Please let me put you a
>question.
>Is there any differences between the delation that I would do informing your
>wife about Phillips' written atrocities and the fact that you inform
>Krueger's religious congregation about his written atrocities ?

Yes. You have been told to stay away from my wife in any way shape or form.
Arny asked me to send a copy of the lawsuit to his church. He demanded that I
"do it now." Marc just gave the the address needed to carry out Arny's demand.
Do you not see the difference?


>
>>>>>>>>Yep. Unfortunately for you, my standards are pretty normal on the
>>>>>>>>subject.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>LOL, you believe that because you are the only judge !
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong as usual.
>>>>>
>>>>>It will be difficult for you to prove the contrary, moreover if like you
>>>>>I don't accept any proofs.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong again. You are consistant.
>>>
>>>Which proofs are you able to provide to support the above ? A psychologist
>>>report ? A baptism certificate ? A petition ? A sport licence ? A library
>>>card or a swimming pool subscription? ;-)
>
>You forget the above one ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
No. I just don't think it warrents a response. Your mistakes above are obvious
IMO. And IMO if they aren't obvious to you no proof will help you see.

[S888Wheel]

>Date: 4/12/2004 6:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13 Avril
>2004 02:53 wrote:
>
>> Except I never called you a pedophile or accused you of necrophilia with
>> your own child.This is what you believe about Marc. So you have not made
>> the same choice based on the same circumstances. You went balistic over an
>> insult that barely involved your father. You over reacted. Honestly if you
>> think that my comment that sent you over the edge was the moral equivilent
>> of your accusations of pedophilia and the rape of my own children you are
>> completely out of line with common moral beliefs. If I equated the two I
>> never would have made the comment. I thought it was no big deal. There is
>> no questioning the mallace behind Arny's false accusations against me of
>> pedophilia and there is no question about your mallice in your false
>> accusations against me of raping my own children.
>
>
>
>> No such mallace existed in my comment regarding your father.
>
>Listen me S888Wheel this will be my last words to you.

Not likely. You are too obsessed.

The above sentence
>prove that you are the biggest liar and hypocrite on RAO.


You are an idiot.


>No malice ? Have you already forget the "piano lesson" ?

Nope but apparently you have forgotten the time line. But you are a ****ing
idiot. That comment came after you falsely accused me of raping my own children
you selfrighteous ****.

You are really an
>incredible ****ing *******. I hope some day Porky George will eat your
>balls

I might be offended if this wasn't almost straight out of the French castle
from Monty Python and the holy grail.


>Just for *this* lie, as sure as I will remain a piece of **** under your
>shoes

Yep you will remain a piece of **** on my shoe. You must be proud.

(I like this comparison because I console myself thinking that I
>still bring you some olfactive troubles).

You are the one obsessed. You are a joke. Maybe you will understand this. "I
fart in your general direction, your mother was a hamster and your father
smelled of elderberries."


>So, as sure as I will remains an excrement for you, you will remains the
>main target of my hatred


Ooh I'm sooo sacared.

and I hope for you and for me that the devil will
>never allow that we ever meet together.

Even if we meet, which I doubt. You will still be **** stuck on the bottom of
my shoe.


>You can send a copy of this mail to the FBI, CIA, Interpol... if you want.

Why? They'll just say you are French and I have nothing to worry about. Have
you wiped the **** off of your white flag yet?


>
>PS : since he made some nasty fat jokes about the 13,000 dead people in
>France this summer your friend Marc Phillips is in the "cul-de-basse-fosse"
>of my newsreader. Understand ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
I understand that you are an idiot and a selfrighteous hypocrite. yo daddy....
Now go pound the walls in rage. Fool.

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel said:

>PS : since he made some nasty fat jokes about the 13,000 dead people in
>France this summer your friend Marc Phillips is in the "cul-de-basse-fosse"
>of my newsreader. Understand ?
>
>

Again you lie through your teeth, Lionel. We both know you're afraid to speak
to me directly anymore. And the joke was about Chirac, ****head.

Boon

[S888Wheel]

>Date: 4/13/2004 2:39 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13 Avril
>2004 04:28 wrote:
>
>> yo daddy.... Now go pound the walls in rage. Fool.
>
>Yo daughters... Now you can go to calm your erection. Pedophile.
>
>

You shouldn't project your daddy's bad habbits onto me. ;-)

[S888Wheel]

>Message-id: >
>
>Marc Phillips - > - mardi 13
>Avril 2004 15:11 wrote:
>
>> Lionel said:
>>
>>>PS : since he made some nasty fat jokes about the 13,000 dead people in
>>>France this summer your friend Marc Phillips is in the
>>>"cul-de-basse-fosse" of my newsreader. Understand ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Again you lie through your teeth, Lionel. We both know you're afraid to
>> speak
>> to me directly anymore. And the joke was about Chirac, ****head.
>>
>> Boon
>
>"Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay here,
>unaware until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins will die from
>the ninety degree temperatures inside your pathetic little hovels."
>
>Boon
>
>PS : I guess that S888Wheel knowd that you use to sodomize his youngest
>daughter ? Is she's as good as her mother ?
>
>
>
>
>
>

How good did your daddy say you were? Did it make it hard to walk afterwards?

[S888Wheel]

>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13 Avril
>2004 21:47 wrote:
>
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
>>>Marc Phillips - > - mardi 13
>>>Avril 2004 15:11 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lionel said:
>>>>
>>>>>PS : since he made some nasty fat jokes about the 13,000 dead people in
>>>>>France this summer your friend Marc Phillips is in the
>>>>>"cul-de-basse-fosse" of my newsreader. Understand ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Again you lie through your teeth, Lionel. We both know you're afraid to
>>>> speak
>>>> to me directly anymore. And the joke was about Chirac, ****head.
>>>>
>>>> Boon
>>>
>>>"Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay here,
>>>unaware until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins will die
>>>from the ninety degree temperatures inside your pathetic little hovels."
>>>
>>>Boon
>>>
>>>PS : I guess that S888Wheel knowd that you use to sodomize his youngest
>>>daughter ? Is she's as good as her mother ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> How good did your daddy say you were? Did it make it hard to walk
>> afterwards?
>
>You shouldn't gag your daughters, they would be able to tell you. :o)
>
>
>
>
>
>

So you are saying that your father may have raped my daughters? How many
children do you believe he raped? No wonder he is such a sore subject with you.
Did you ever report him? ;-)

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel, proven liar, said:

>Marc Phillips - > - mardi 13
>Avril 2004 15:11 wrote:
>
>> Lionel said:
>>
>>>PS : since he made some nasty fat jokes about the 13,000 dead people in
>>>France this summer your friend Marc Phillips is in the
>>>"cul-de-basse-fosse" of my newsreader. Understand ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Again you lie through your teeth, Lionel. We both know you're afraid to
>> speak
>> to me directly anymore. And the joke was about Chirac, ****head.
>>
>> Boon
>
>"Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay here,
>unaware until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins will die from
>the ninety degree temperatures inside your pathetic little hovels."

And you think that's a joke?

>Boon
>
>PS : I guess that S888Wheel knowd that you use to sodomize his youngest
>daughter ? Is she's as good as her mother ?

Sorry. Doesn't make sense in English.

Boon

[S888Wheel]

>From: Lionel
>Date: 4/13/2004 1:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13 Avril
>2004 22:34 wrote:
>
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
>>>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13
>>>Avril 2004 21:47 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>
>>>>>Marc Phillips - > - mardi
>>>>>13 Avril 2004 15:11 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lionel said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>PS : since he made some nasty fat jokes about the 13,000 dead people
>>>>>>>in France this summer your friend Marc Phillips is in the
>>>>>>>"cul-de-basse-fosse" of my newsreader. Understand ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again you lie through your teeth, Lionel. We both know you're afraid
>>>>>> to speak
>>>>>> to me directly anymore. And the joke was about Chirac, ****head.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>
>>>>>"Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay here,
>>>>>unaware until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins will die
>>>>>from the ninety degree temperatures inside your pathetic little hovels."
>>>>>
>>>>>Boon
>>>>>
>>>>>PS : I guess that S888Wheel knowd that you use to sodomize his youngest
>>>>>daughter ? Is she's as good as her mother ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How good did your daddy say you were? Did it make it hard to walk
>>>> afterwards?
>>>
>>>c
>
>> So you are saying that your father may have raped my daughters? How many
>> children do you believe he raped? No wonder he is such a sore subject with
>> you. Did you ever report him? ;-)
>
>You are right

I suggest therapy to heal the scars.

Remember saying this?


"Listen me S888Wheel this will be my last words to you."

Were you lying or are you simply lacking self control? Your obsession with me
and my family is a bit creepy but you are a bit comical none the less. I
suppose you have beaten your hands bloody many a time over posts on RAO given
your lack of self control. There are programs for anger management. You might
want to look into them before some one mistakenly takes you seriously and beats
you severely enough for hosipitalization. Just ask Arny how miserable it is to
be hospitalized for being an asshole. I'm suspect it isn't worth it. In case
you mistake this for any kind of threat don't worry. I am a pacifist and don't
suffer from your lack of self control. And most of all, I don't take you
seriously.

You never answered my question. Did you ever report your suspicions of your
father's rape of children to the authorities?

[S888Wheel]

>From: Lionel
>Date: 4/13/2004 2:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13 Avril
>2004 23:11 wrote:
>
>>>From: Lionel
>>>Date: 4/13/2004 1:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
>>>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13
>>>Avril 2004 22:34 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>
>>>>>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13
>>>>>Avril 2004 21:47 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Marc Phillips - > - mardi
>>>>>>>13 Avril 2004 15:11 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lionel said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>PS : since he made some nasty fat jokes about the 13,000 dead people
>>>>>>>>>in France this summer your friend Marc Phillips is in the
>>>>>>>>>"cul-de-basse-fosse" of my newsreader. Understand ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Again you lie through your teeth, Lionel. We both know you're
>>>>>>>> afraid to speak
>>>>>>>> to me directly anymore. And the joke was about Chirac, ****head.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay here,
>>>>>>>unaware until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins will die
>>>>>>>from the ninety degree temperatures inside your pathetic little
>>>>>>>hovels."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Boon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>PS : I guess that S888Wheel knowd that you use to sodomize his
>>>>>>>youngest daughter ? Is she's as good as her mother ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How good did your daddy say you were? Did it make it hard to walk
>>>>>> afterwards?
>>>>>
>>>>>c
>>>
>>>> So you are saying that your father may have raped my daughters? How many
>>>> children do you believe he raped? No wonder he is such a sore subject
>>>> with you. Did you ever report him? ;-)
>>>
>>>You are right
>>
>> I suggest therapy to heal the scars.
>>
>> Remember saying this?
>>
>>
>> "Listen me S888Wheel this will be my last words to you."
>
>Remember saying this?
>
>"I don't think it is such a good idea to encourage you in stalking me. You
>are obviously obsessed. Maybe I shouldn't respond to your posts anymore."
>
>It was on Date :2004-01-12 09:07:47 PST
>
> Were you lying or are you simply lacking self control?
>
>
>
>
>
>

Niether. I guess your'e just to stupid to understand the word "maybe." I would
think that to a rational person pointing out their inability to control their
rage would help end the stalking and obsessive behavior. I expected too much
from you? So were you lying or lacking in self control? Or are you simply
incapable of any rational thought? Did you ever report your suspicions about
your daddy and his abuse of children? You keep avoiding these questions.

[S888Wheel]

>Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13 Avril
>2004 23:37 wrote:
>
>>>From: Lionel
>>>Date: 4/13/2004 2:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
>>>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13
>>>Avril 2004 23:11 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>From: Lionel
>>>>>Date: 4/13/2004 1:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>
>>>>>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13
>>>>>Avril 2004 22:34 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>S888Wheel - > - mardi 13
>>>>>>>Avril 2004 21:47 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Marc Phillips - > -
>>>>>>>>>mardi 13 Avril 2004 15:11 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lionel said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>PS : since he made some nasty fat jokes about the 13,000 dead
>>>>>>>>>>>people in France this summer your friend Marc Phillips is in the
>>>>>>>>>>>"cul-de-basse-fosse" of my newsreader. Understand ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Again you lie through your teeth, Lionel. We both know you're
>>>>>>>>>> afraid to speak
>>>>>>>>>> to me directly anymore. And the joke was about Chirac, ****head.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay
>>>>>>>>>here, unaware until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins
>>>>>>>>>will die from the ninety degree temperatures inside your pathetic
>>>>>>>>>little hovels."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Boon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>PS : I guess that S888Wheel knowd that you use to sodomize his
>>>>>>>>>youngest daughter ? Is she's as good as her mother ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How good did your daddy say you were? Did it make it hard to walk
>>>>>>>> afterwards?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>c
>>>>>
>>>>>> So you are saying that your father may have raped my daughters? How
>>>>>> many children do you believe he raped? No wonder he is such a sore
>>>>>> subject with you. Did you ever report him? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>You are right
>>>>
>>>> I suggest therapy to heal the scars.
>>>>
>>>> Remember saying this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Listen me S888Wheel this will be my last words to you."
>>>
>>>Remember saying this?
>>>
>>>"I don't think it is such a good idea to encourage you in stalking me. You
>>>are obviously obsessed. Maybe I shouldn't respond to your posts anymore."
>>>
>>>It was on Date :2004-01-12 09:07:47 PST
>>>
>>> Were you lying or are you simply lacking self control?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Niether. I guess your'e just to stupid to understand the word "maybe."
>
>I understand the word maybe. I was just demonstrating your lack of
>character.
>
>[snip blah, blah blah from a vexed guy]
>
>> Did you ever report your suspicions about your daddy and his abuse of
>children? You keep avoiding these questions.
>
>Ooops ! Is it the impression I give ?
>Sorry it's totally involuntary but I don't know what you are speaking about.
>
>I know that you are organizing the rape of your daugthers with Boon and I'm
>surprised that you are not in jail at this moment.
>I know that your father work for Justice Dpt so I wouldn't be surprised that
>he help you to conceal your pedophile orgies in exchange of some physical
>compensations.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Are these dimented fantasies the results of your father's late night visits to
your bed as a child? Something has deeply disturbed you for you to be this
dimented. Does he still violate you in your nightmares? ;-)

You seem obsessed with the rape of my daughters (::chuckle::, you can't really
get much of anything right) Are you projecting? Are your daughters inheriting a
dark family secret passed down from your father through you? ;-)