Re: Message for Paul Wagner

[Arny Krueger]

The Artist wrote:
> Received an email from suspected of
> containing PSW-Worm.

IOW we've got another naive one who thinks that you can tell who sent you
email, by looking at headers.

[Robert Moreijn]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> The Artist wrote:
> > Received an email from suspected of
> > containing PSW-Worm.
>
> IOW we've got another naive one who thinks that you can tell who sent you
> email, by looking at headers.
>
Why did you say this?
You missed an opportunity to deflect suspicion away from yourself.

[Robert Moreijn]

"The Artist" > wrote in message
...
> "Arny Krueger" emitted :
>
> >> Received an email from suspected of
> >> containing PSW-Worm.
> >
> >IOW we've got another naive one who thinks that you can tell who sent you
> >email, by looking at headers.
>
> You are wrong as usual, I haven't drawn any conclusions from the
> headers. I posted the message for Pauls information - mind your own
> business...
>
Arny never misses an opportunity for gratuitous nastiness.
He has a malignant personality.

[Robert Moreijn]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Robert Moreijn said:
>
> > Arny never misses an opportunity for gratuitous nastiness.
> > He has a malignant personality.
>
> Who the **** are you?
>
I am who the fjuck I sjay I ajm.

[Torresists]

>From: The Artist
>Date: 3/31/2004 5:15 PM Central Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>"Arny Krueger" emitted :
>
>>> Received an email from suspected of
>>> containing PSW-Worm.
>>
>>IOW we've got another naive one who thinks that you can tell who sent you
>>email, by looking at headers.
>
>You are wrong as usual, I haven't drawn any conclusions from the
>headers. I posted the message for Pauls information - mind your own
>business...
>
>
>--
>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[dave weil]

On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:15:30 +0100, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

>"Arny Krueger" emitted :
>
>>> Received an email from suspected of
>>> containing PSW-Worm.
>>
>>IOW we've got another naive one who thinks that you can tell who sent you
>>email, by looking at headers.
>
>You are wrong as usual, I haven't drawn any conclusions from the
>headers. I posted the message for Pauls information - mind your own
>business...

Arnold's not too bright about this computer stuff, you know.

[Arny Krueger]

Robert Moreijn wrote:
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> The Artist wrote:
>>> Received an email from suspected of
>>> containing PSW-Worm.
>>
>> IOW we've got another naive one who thinks that you can tell who
>> sent you email, by looking at headers.
>>
> Why did you say this?

It's the truth!

> You missed an opportunity to deflect suspicion away from yourself..

You're nuts. I don't play those kind of childish games.

The whole lot of you are nuts - with paranoid delusions about people out to
get you. Most likely the guilty party is some virus run amuck in some
unknown third or fourth party's machine.

[Arny Krueger]

The Artist wrote:
> "Arny Krueger" emitted :
>
>>> Received an email from suspected of
>>> containing PSW-Worm.
>>
>> IOW we've got another naive one who thinks that you can tell who
>> sent you email, by looking at headers.
>
> You are wrong as usual, I haven't drawn any conclusions from the
> headers. I posted the message for Pauls information - mind your own
> business...

OK, I get it now, Dormer. You drew your conclusions from the voices in your
head. Thanks for sharing and hope you get out of detox soon!

[dave weil]

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 05:15:21 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>The Artist wrote:
>> "Arny Krueger" emitted :
>>
>>>> Received an email from suspected of
>>>> containing PSW-Worm.
>>>
>>> IOW we've got another naive one who thinks that you can tell who
>>> sent you email, by looking at headers.
>>
>> You are wrong as usual, I haven't drawn any conclusions from the
>> headers. I posted the message for Pauls information - mind your own
>> business...
>
>OK, I get it now, Dormer. You drew your conclusions from the voices in your
>head. Thanks for sharing and hope you get out of detox soon!

No, it's common courtesy to inform someone if their computer is
sending out virused messages because often times they don't even know
it and so they don't know that they have a virus on their machine.

Ahhhh, I see your problem with seeing this; the phrase "common
courtesy" is involved.

[Arny Krueger]

dave weil wrote:

> No, it's common courtesy to inform someone if their computer is
> sending out virused messages because often times they don't even know
> it and so they don't know that they have a virus on their machine.

Yes, via private email not public humiliation.

However, in the current world situation, it is virtually a certainty that
the apparent source of a virus or spam email is not the actual source.

[dave weil]

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:29:33 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>dave weil wrote:
>
>> No, it's common courtesy to inform someone if their computer is
>> sending out virused messages because often times they don't even know
>> it and so they don't know that they have a virus on their machine.
>
>Yes, via private email not public humiliation.

It's not humiliation to post such a message. After all, the last thing
that anyone should do really is to send an email with your address on
it to a possibly virused computer. While nothing might happen, why
tempt fate?

You seem to be the only who's interpreting this as humilation.
Everyone else realizes that he was doing a public service, not only
for Paul, but to others that might have gotten virused mail from
Paul's computer. This is almost SOP these days - when you get a
virused email from someone active on a mailing list or group, you
normally notify the whole group, for the above reasons.

>However, in the current world situation, it is virtually a certainty that
>the apparent source of a virus or spam email is not the actual source.

That is certainly a big possibility. But why take chances?

In any case, you should take a chill pill, because it's obvious that
Paul wasn't trying to humiliate the other Paul.

[PW]

Artist Signal,

Thanks for letting me know. I quit Earthlink
nearly a year ago, though, and my account
there hasn't been active since that time (to
my knowledge) so a hacker must be glom-
ming onto an old post of mine, or the like.
I appreciate your informing me, though --
do me a fave: send a few messages to
that email address and see if you get any
responses (I don't), would you? If you do,
maybe I can contact Earthlink and see to it
that the account is really dead.

-Paul Wagner-


The Artist wrote:

>Received an email from suspected of
>containing PSW-Worm.
>
>
>--
>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>
>