View Full Version : Martha, My Dear
Sandman
March 5th 04, 08:33 PM
Bye, bye Martha Stewart.
Bye, bye Tommy Chong.
Now if the Bush/Ashcroft bunch had only gone after Ken Lay and other Enron
officials and the principals at Halliburton and its subsidiary, Kellog for
all their civil and criminal transgressions, they'd all be in prison today
instead of running around spending their ill-gotten money, and in the case
of Enron, the employees would have their retirement funds which were stolen
by Ken Lay and the boys back in their pockets.
So what's wrong with this picture?
Does it take a genius to figure it all out?
Jail to the Chief!
Sockpuppet Yustabe
March 5th 04, 09:49 PM
"Sandman" > wrote in message
...
> Bye, bye Martha Stewart.
>
I don't think she should get a lot of time, maybe two or three years, but
she should be assigned to bunk with a real slob.
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
GeoSynch
March 6th 04, 02:13 AM
Sandy lamented:
> Bye, bye Martha Stewart.
Here's a little gasoline to stoke your misery fire - the political angle for the
overly zealous prosecution: "Martha Stewart: Democrat Mega-Donor":
http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/6/25/163343
> Bye, bye Tommy Chong.
Cosmic karma for fleetingly playing a Kafka-esque dude in a Cheech & Chong flick.
> Now if the Bush/Ashcroft bunch had only gone after Ken Lay and other Enron ...
Starting with Hillary's fraudulent commodity bonanza and then DNC bozo McAuliffe
reaping a $180 million windfall from a $100,000 investment in Global Crossing and
former Clinton Treasury chief Bob Rubin's attempted illegal intervention on Enron's
behalf.
GeoSynch
ScottW
March 6th 04, 03:11 AM
"Sandman" > wrote in message
...
> Bye, bye Martha Stewart.
>
> Bye, bye Tommy Chong.
>
> Now if the Bush/Ashcroft bunch had only gone after Ken Lay and other
Enron
> officials and the principals at Halliburton and its subsidiary, Kellog
for
> all their civil and criminal transgressions, they'd all be in prison
today
> instead of running around spending their ill-gotten money, and in the
case
> of Enron, the employees would have their retirement funds which were
stolen
> by Ken Lay and the boys back in their pockets.
You do realize there are numerous suits in progress against
Enron and Lay? Some of which are being pursued by the
Labor dept.
You also realize the issue of Enron employees retirement
funds was really limited to the company's matching
contribution to their 401K.
ScottW
Sockpuppet Yustabe
March 6th 04, 03:28 AM
"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:Ajb2c.15872$id3.6251@fed1read01...
>
> "Sandman" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Bye, bye Martha Stewart.
> >
> > Bye, bye Tommy Chong.
> >
> > Now if the Bush/Ashcroft bunch had only gone after Ken Lay and other
> Enron
> > officials and the principals at Halliburton and its subsidiary, Kellog
> for
> > all their civil and criminal transgressions, they'd all be in prison
> today
> > instead of running around spending their ill-gotten money, and in the
> case
> > of Enron, the employees would have their retirement funds which were
> stolen
> > by Ken Lay and the boys back in their pockets.
>
> You do realize there are numerous suits in progress against
> Enron and Lay? Some of which are being pursued by the
> Labor dept.
>
> You also realize the issue of Enron employees retirement
> funds was really limited to the company's matching
> contribution to their 401K.
>
But didn't the rules of the plan require that the employees
invest a certain percentage of their contributions in
Enron stock?
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
ScottW
March 6th 04, 04:23 AM
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
...
> >
>
> But didn't the rules of the plan require that the employees
> invest a certain percentage of their contributions in
> Enron stock?
Not from what I have read. It was an option to
invest the employee contribution into Enron stock.
The company contribution went into stock
and they were prohibited from selling
until age 50. There was a problem
with a change in plan administrator that caused
some employees to think they couldn't sell any
stock right at the meltdown.
ScottW
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.