PDA

View Full Version : Att: Richard Graham re McCarty forgery


Robert Morein
March 14th 06, 03:41 PM
Two posts have been forged in my name, from usenet host Highwinds Media,
which is one of the two companies Brian L. McCarty is currently signed with.
I did not post these items, nor do I agree with the contents of the posts.
The full text of the two posts appears below:

Mr. Graham, although I am not obliged to identify every post as a forgery,
it is a pleasure to oblige you, since in this case, it does not appear to
have been universally understood as such. I now await your response.

Regards,
Robert Morein

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ne wshub.sdsu.edu!peer01.west.cox.net!cox.net!hwmnpee r01.phx!hwmedia!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.phx!newsfe05.phx.highwinds-media.com.POSTED!976fb0cf!not-for-mail
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.1.051004
Subject: Re: Amazing FREE Audio Tweak No. 2! For Advanced Audiophiles Only!
From: Robert Morein >
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Message-ID: >
Thread-Topic: Amazing FREE Audio Tweak No. 2! For Advanced Audiophiles
Only!
Thread-Index: AcZDOPjqN0S9Y68sEdqzPgARJDMMbA==
References: . com>
>
. com>
>
. com>
>
. com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Lines: 81
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:19:09 PST
Organization: BuzzardNews.Com
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:19:00 +1000
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:802025

In article . com,
" > wrote:
> Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
>
>> On 8 Mar 2006 12:57:36 -0800, wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7 Mar 2006 22:01:43 -0800, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5 Mar 2006 21:13:43 -0800, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Biogeometry teaches us that shapes and symbols can have special
>>>>>>> meaning
>>>>>>> to us, and friendly ones can have beneficial effects on our
>>>>>>> environments, and as I have discovered in my long and wondrous
>>>>>>> journey
>>>>>>> as an audiophile, on our senses as well. For today's excercise,
>>>>>>> we'll
>>>>>>> be drawing special shapes on objects to improve the sound we hear
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> our audio systems. To this end, I'd like to introduce you to the
>>>>>>> "L-Shape". So-called because it looks like an "L", with the corner
>>>>>>> curved inward. Here's what I mean:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/bigpicture.cfm?id=1955&c=ponduyys
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's not much demand for nincompoops, note.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that why you're out of a job? I'm sorry for you, then. Keep a stiff
>>>>> upper lip, I'm sure something will give.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're just miffed because I don't fancy taking my brain out, putting
>>>> it through a mincer and stuffing it back in, so I can become a
>>>> tweako-freako crook.
>>>
>>> Excuse me? Are you talking to me, goofball? You seem to have some
>>> "personal issues" that you need to resolve. All that anger can't be
>>> helping your sound quality much. Where do you get off calling me a
>>> "crook", when all of the tweaks I generously put up here, I didn't
>>> charge anyone for, and they don't even cost a cent to execute? What
>>> exactly are you doing to help audiophiles here improve their sound,
>>> pray tell?
>>>
>>> And are you sure you have a brain to take out? Have you checked in
>>> there lately? Because if you think you need to remove your brain before
>>> you attempt to improve your perception of sound with one of my tweaks,
>>> then it doesn't sound like you had one to begin with.
>>>
>>> BTW, I really do hope you get a job again at some point. Maybe when you
>>> have a bit of money coming in, you won't be so paranoid, and everyone
>>> around you won't appear to be a "crook", perhaps.
>>
>> I would not charge you for my car tweaks. You put two L plates on and
>> sure enough you learn to drive. If you put an asprin on the roof you
>> no longer have to hold the steering wheel ehile driving. You have to
>> be "open minded" for the second one to work but not for long.
>
> Congratulations. You've proven you can be as stupid, if not stupider,
> than everyone else. Happy now?
>
>> Just as a matter of interest... Have you ever managed to sell one of
>> your silly tweaks?
>
> I understand you're out of a job, but that's no reason to be such a
> rotten, cynical ******* as you are. Or maybe considering your hope of
> getting one, it is?
>
> Who said that I "sell silly tweaks"? Oh. You did. How stupid is that?
> You also called me a "crook", and you never answered my question, as to
> how I was a "crook". How stupid is that, to accuse someone of being a
> "crook", when you can't even say how they robbed others? Or are you
> assuming I "sell silly tweaks", and that must be how I "rob people"

You do "sell silly tweaks", that's what you've been trying to sell the
group. the fact you don't do it very well is irrelevant. And your silly
tweaks are crooked, so you're a crook, the fact you don't do it very well is
irrelevant. Your a horrible, evil man.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ne wshub.sdsu.edu!peer01.west.cox.net!cox.net!hwmnpee r01.phx!hwmedia!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.phx!newsfe05.phx.highwinds-media.com.POSTED!976fb0cf!not-for-mail
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.1.051004
Subject: Re: Amazing FREE Audio Tweak No. 2! For Advanced Audiophiles Only!
From: Robert Morein >
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Message-ID: >
Thread-Topic: Amazing FREE Audio Tweak No. 2! For Advanced Audiophiles
Only!
Thread-Index: AcZDRqFT36+Ioq85EdqMfgARJDMMbA==
References: . com>
>
. com>
>
. com>
>
. com>
>
. com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Lines: 87
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:57:05 PST
Organization: BuzzardNews.Com
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:56:46 +1000
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:802045

In article . com,
" > wrote:
> Robert Morein went off his meds and wrote :
>
>> In article . com,
>> " > wrote:
>>> Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
>>>
>>> Who said that I "sell silly tweaks"? Oh. You did. How stupid is that?
>>> You also called me a "crook", and you never answered my question, as to
>>> how I was a "crook". How stupid is that, to accuse someone of being a
>>> "crook", when you can't even say how they robbed others? Or are you
>>> assuming I "sell silly tweaks", and that must be how I "rob people"
>
>
> Morein, I figure either this is your idea of a joke, or you just went
> off your meds....
>
>> You do "sell silly tweaks", that's what you've been trying to sell the
>> group. the fact you don't do it very well is irrelevant.
>
> Perhaps. But the fact that I don't _charge_ for the tweaks IS, you
> moron. It means I'm not "selling" anything.

Charge? People around the world routinely "sell" things without money
changing hands. In this case, you're trying to "sell" the group on your
nasty, nasty ideas about audio. Well, as you can see no one's buying.

>
>> And your silly tweaks are crooked, so you're a crook,
>
> What did you do, inhabit the mind of Mike mckelvy? Just two hours ago,
> I told you that you in email that I thought you were a smart man. I
> obviously misjudged you. Apparently, I hadn't heard enough from you.
> You show that your posession of logic is no better than that of a true
> fool, like a mckelvy, a Kreuger or even a Westface. I'm gonna have some
> fun showing you to be the fool I say you are, by tearing your infantile
> logic argument apart:
>
> 1) Firstly, most, if not all the tweaks i shared with the group, are
> not mine. So if they are not valid, that wouldnt make me a "crook", you
> imbecile. It would merely make the tweaks invalid.
>
> 2) Secondly, even if they were invalid, it still wouldn't make me a
> "crook" or make them "silly" or "crooked". It would simply mean YOU
> can't hear the effect. And should I be surprised, since you _told_ me
> you'd never be able to discern an effect?
>
> 3) Even if they were _my_ tweaks, and were invalid, which after about
> 600 messages and 1000 criticisms of me and the tweaks, absolutely NOT
> ONE SINGLE PERSON HERE HAS EVER EVEN COME CLOSE TO PROVING, that
> _still_ wouldn't make me a "crook". Guess why, Robert? Because I'm not
> SELLING anything, you stupid git. As a matter of fact, I even offered
> to GIVE you a free cd marker to try out one of the tweaks, because you
> were too much of a cheap ******* to waste your ink in case it didnt
> work. You certainly have no problem wasting your time though, do you?
>
> 4) Where is YOUR evidence that the tweaks are "silly" and "crooked"?
> Are _you_ going to be the first out of a thousand respondents to prove
> they are invalid? Go on. I dare you. I DOUBLE dare you. Prove your
> claim that they're crooked or you'll have admitted you're an ignorant
> liar. Not you or anyone on this newsgroup is intelligent enough to
> successfully disprove any of them. All anyone has ever done is vigorous
> assertions and ad hominem attacks against me, but when it comes to
> proving their false claims about the tweaks, pure and utter silence.
>
>> the fact you don't do it very well is irrelevant.
>
> The fact that I don't do _what_ very well? Make a profit from the
> tweaks I'm not selling, you blithering idiot?! LOL!
>
>> Your a horrible, evil man.
>
> For what, offering you a free cd marker to help you improve your sound,
> or for posting free tweaks to help RAO members improve their sound for
> free? Perhaps you think Im responsible for the hole in the ozone layer?
> Tell me, is there something in the water that RAO members are drinking
> which makes most respondents appear to be fearful, paranoid mental
> patients? Maybe I should have listened more closely to all those
> messages that were calling you a "crook" and your son a mental case. I
> will now.

I already have a marker. It doesn't' work. You don't have to "sell" me
another, you crook.

>