View Full Version : About Soundhaspriority
Robert Morein
March 10th 06, 09:19 PM
I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His posts
are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are significantly
different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
logical thought.
I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
nothing else, it is very interesting.
And, of course, please ignore the abusive posts provided by Brian L.
McCarty, currently posting from Highwinds Media, who somehow thinks he can
recover his fortune by doing so.
Brian, we are your constant companion till the day you die. We will never
let you off the ground.
Robert Morein wrote:
> I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
> intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
> like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His posts
> are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
> substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are significantly
> different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
> presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
> logical thought.
>
> I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
> nothing else, it is very interesting.
>
> And, of course, please ignore the abusive posts provided by Brian L.
> McCarty, currently posting from Highwinds Media, who somehow thinks he can
> recover his fortune by doing so.
>
> Brian, we are your constant companion till the day you die. We will never
> let you off the ground.
Wow, a glowing endorsement from nowhere.
He's welcome to post some of the elaboration on the
Eastern framework of his logical thought.
So far all he's done is post contradictory statements and rant at
those that point to his lack of substantive content.
Grasshopper is welcome to demonstrate his mastery, perhaps
perform accupunture on some electrolytics.
The guy that shot Lennon was demonstrating cogency in his
beliefs too.
wrote:
> Robert Morein wrote:
> > I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
> > intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
> > like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His posts
> > are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
> > substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are significantly
> > different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
> > presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
> > logical thought.
> >
> > I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
> > nothing else, it is very interesting.
>
> Wow, a glowing endorsement from nowhere.
Look who's talking! He uses his real name, at least. You have a
meaningless email address. He may be from nowhere, but you're
_nothing_. I'd rather be nowhere, than be you, you little ankle-biter.
No one cares what you have to say on this group, that much I've been
able to determine. Least of all me, which is why I ignore most of your
posts, 99% of which are trying to troll me. All we see is one angry
rant after another from you, toward me. And every time I see another
one of your angry diatribes for me, I laugh at you some more. Geez,
even your attack threads against me went.... guess where? Yup,
"nowhere". LOL!
Here's a funny fact for you to chew on: You think I'm a crook, you
think I'm a liar, you think I'm nuts, you think I have nothing valid to
say, etc etc. And yet you're constantly on my ass, stalking me, writing
messages about me, either to me or to others - like you have nothing
better to do with your life. So either you have a sick little obsession
with me, or you're in love with me. Which is it, ankle-biter?
> He's welcome to post some of the elaboration on the
> Eastern framework of his logical thought.
Stop right there. You are now quoting Mr. Morein's opinion of what the
ideas are based on. I don't happen to agree with Robert on that. I have
no reason to, the inventor is a Westerner, his inspiration is a
Westerner, the sciences involved are Western sciences. Those are all
facts. But you believed what Mr. Morein told you, simply because you
didn't see a reason not to believe it. You know who else does that,
westface? Sheep. Sheep and lemming. Welcome to the herd, you mindless
lemming.
You just learned your first lesson about how not to be a sheep,
grasshopper. Remember it.
> Grasshopper is welcome to demonstrate his mastery, perhaps
> perform accupunture on some electrolytics.
No fool. You're still confused. I'm Master Po. You're little
Grasshopper. I do peform accupuncture on electrolytics. I have
described my methods to Sander deWaal, if anyone wishes to learn from
them. Now, back to you. You're a non-thinking Western fool with a
severely blocked mind. I couldn't break open your closed mind with
gelignite. And it'd be foolish of me to try. "Wasted energy". I have no
energy to waste on worthless fools. I put ideas out in the universe. If
you want to learn from them, waste the energy yourself, by trying the
ideas. If you're not interested in trying the ideas, then there is no
reason to be asking how they work, and this conversation is over.
> The guy that shot Lennon was demonstrating cogency in his
> beliefs too.
Speaking of which, I see that you haven't yet threatened me with a gun
in this thread. So far. I guess that'll come later, when I'm really
****ing you off.
Robert Morein wrote:
> I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
> intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
> like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll.
No, why would anybody think that?
His posts
> are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
> substantial philosophy behind them.
Do tell. Which philosophy would that be?
While our viewpoints are significantly
> different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
> presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
> logical thought.
>
Where is the Soundhaspriority home world?
> I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
> nothing else, it is very interesting.
>
Like watching a traffic accident?
Robert, in order to believe what you say you believe about this guy,
you wouold actually have to be crazy, and I don't think you are.
So that leaves the certainty that you and he (assuming he is not you)
are playing a game. As facscinating as it might be, I think I'll take
a nap.
Yawn.
paul packer
March 11th 06, 09:23 AM
On 11 Mar 2006 00:14:07 -0800, "
> wrote:
>Yawn.
More shades of Arnie.
Steven Sullivan
March 11th 06, 10:33 AM
paul packer > wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2006 00:14:07 -0800, "
> > wrote:
> >Yawn.
> More shades of Arnie.
It's funny how you can only see posts in terms of 'Arny' and 'not Arny'.
George M. Middius
March 11th 06, 01:41 PM
Sillybot reminds us that he is the Krooborg's apprentice in hypocracy™.
> It's funny how you can only see posts in terms of 'Arny' and 'not Arny'.
Would you please go on the record with your belief that Arnii Kroofeces is
an honest, upstanding Netizen? We know you've swallowed whole his
evangelical message that "tests" are the panacea for pernicious clas envy.
wrote:
> wrote:
>
> > Robert Morein wrote:
>
> > > I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
> > > intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
> > > like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His posts
> > > are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
> > > substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are significantly
> > > different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
> > > presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
> > > logical thought.
> > >
> > > I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
> > > nothing else, it is very interesting.
> >
> > Wow, a glowing endorsement from nowhere.
>
> Look who's talking! He uses his real name, at least. You have a
> meaningless email address. He may be from nowhere, but you're
> _nothing_. I'd rather be nowhere, than be you, you little ankle-biter.
> No one cares what you have to say on this group, that much I've been
> able to determine. Least of all me, which is why I ignore most of your
> posts, 99% of which are trying to troll me. All we see is one angry
> rant after another from you, toward me. And every time I see another
> one of your angry diatribes for me, I laugh at you some more. Geez,
> even your attack threads against me went.... guess where? Yup,
> "nowhere". LOL!
>
> Here's a funny fact for you to chew on: You think I'm a crook, you
> think I'm a liar, you think I'm nuts, you think I have nothing valid to
> say, etc etc. And yet you're constantly on my ass, stalking me, writing
> messages about me, either to me or to others - like you have nothing
> better to do with your life. So either you have a sick little obsession
> with me, or you're in love with me. Which is it, ankle-biter?
>
> > He's welcome to post some of the elaboration on the
> > Eastern framework of his logical thought.
>
> Stop right there. You are now quoting Mr. Morein's opinion of what the
> ideas are based on. I don't happen to agree with Robert on that. I have
> no reason to, the inventor is a Westerner, his inspiration is a
> Westerner, the sciences involved are Western sciences. Those are all
> facts. But you believed what Mr. Morein told you, simply because you
> didn't see a reason not to believe it. You know who else does that,
> westface? Sheep. Sheep and lemming. Welcome to the herd, you mindless
> lemming.
>
> You just learned your first lesson about how not to be a sheep,
> grasshopper. Remember it.
>
> > Grasshopper is welcome to demonstrate his mastery, perhaps
> > perform accupunture on some electrolytics.
>
> No fool. You're still confused. I'm Master Po. You're little
> Grasshopper. I do peform accupuncture on electrolytics. I have
> described my methods to Sander deWaal, if anyone wishes to learn from
> them. Now, back to you. You're a non-thinking Western fool with a
> severely blocked mind. I couldn't break open your closed mind with
> gelignite. And it'd be foolish of me to try. "Wasted energy". I have no
> energy to waste on worthless fools. I put ideas out in the universe. If
> you want to learn from them, waste the energy yourself, by trying the
> ideas. If you're not interested in trying the ideas, then there is no
> reason to be asking how they work, and this conversation is over.
>
> > The guy that shot Lennon was demonstrating cogency in his
> > beliefs too.
>
> Speaking of which, I see that you haven't yet threatened me with a gun
> in this thread. So far. I guess that'll come later, when I'm really
> ****ing you off.
And his real name is:
Cpt. Courageous ;Charles Butler ;Giddeon ;Bimbam the clown ;N/A ;
nobody ;
wrote:
> wrote:
>
> > Robert Morein wrote:
>
> > > I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
> > > intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
> > > like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His posts
> > > are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
> > > substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are significantly
> > > different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
> > > presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
> > > logical thought.
> > >
> > > I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
> > > nothing else, it is very interesting.
> >
> > Wow, a glowing endorsement from nowhere.
>
> Look who's talking! He uses his real name, at least. You have a
> meaningless email address. He may be from nowhere, but you're
> _nothing_. I'd rather be nowhere, than be you, you little ankle-biter.
> No one cares what you have to say on this group, that much I've been
> able to determine. Least of all me, which is why I ignore most of your
> posts, 99% of which are trying to troll me. All we see is one angry
> rant after another from you, toward me. And every time I see another
> one of your angry diatribes for me, I laugh at you some more. Geez,
> even your attack threads against me went.... guess where? Yup,
> "nowhere". LOL!
>
> Here's a funny fact for you to chew on: You think I'm a crook, you
> think I'm a liar, you think I'm nuts, you think I have nothing valid to
> say, etc etc. And yet you're constantly on my ass, stalking me, writing
> messages about me, either to me or to others - like you have nothing
> better to do with your life. So either you have a sick little obsession
> with me, or you're in love with me. Which is it, ankle-biter?
>
> > He's welcome to post some of the elaboration on the
> > Eastern framework of his logical thought.
>
> Stop right there. You are now quoting Mr. Morein's opinion of what the
> ideas are based on. I don't happen to agree with Robert on that. I have
> no reason to, the inventor is a Westerner, his inspiration is a
> Westerner, the sciences involved are Western sciences. Those are all
> facts. But you believed what Mr. Morein told you, simply because you
> didn't see a reason not to believe it. You know who else does that,
> westface? Sheep. Sheep and lemming. Welcome to the herd, you mindless
> lemming.
>
> You just learned your first lesson about how not to be a sheep,
> grasshopper. Remember it.
>
> > Grasshopper is welcome to demonstrate his mastery, perhaps
> > perform accupunture on some electrolytics.
>
> No fool. You're still confused. I'm Master Po. You're little
> Grasshopper. I do peform accupuncture on electrolytics. I have
> described my methods to Sander deWaal, if anyone wishes to learn from
> them. Now, back to you. You're a non-thinking Western fool with a
> severely blocked mind. I couldn't break open your closed mind with
> gelignite. And it'd be foolish of me to try. "Wasted energy". I have no
> energy to waste on worthless fools. I put ideas out in the universe. If
> you want to learn from them, waste the energy yourself, by trying the
> ideas. If you're not interested in trying the ideas, then there is no
> reason to be asking how they work, and this conversation is over.
>
> > The guy that shot Lennon was demonstrating cogency in his
> > beliefs too.
>
> Speaking of which, I see that you haven't yet threatened me with a gun
> in this thread. So far. I guess that'll come later, when I'm really
> ****ing you off.
And his real name is:
Cpt. Courageous ;Charles Butler ;Giddeon ;Bimbam the clown ;N/A ;
nobody ; Nowhere Man ;John S.;Nomad ;Odysseus ;Black Frank ;
{Powell} ;Nestor Makhno ;Too sh*t ;Jawed Ashraf ;Mr. E;ObiCat ;
Mark Little ;Edwin ;taco;Toshi;Proudwhitekraut ;Migwat ;Mukul Paithane
;
Baffer ;Electr0Static ;Mr. Legend ;Simon Egli ;Upenn ;Maegnuz ;
Rod Speed's Mother ;Gavin Cato ;Mauricio & Marisa ;Laura ;
Blipster ;Hollow Man ;Kenny Lingus ;Andy Bolstridge ;sook me auf ;
Rune Halvorsen ;RuudM ;Sean Sharkey ;rdrast ;Mick ;Earl Kiosterud ;
Newps ;DelphiDude ;Tim Conway ;Andy Bolstridge
;etc,etc,etc,etc..........
Yes, you have once again posted another incredibly fact filled and
accurate depiction of what I stated. Your validation methodology
needs a bit of fine tuning.
Clyde Slick
March 11th 06, 03:16 PM
"Steven Sullivan" > wrote in message
...
> paul packer > wrote:
>> On 11 Mar 2006 00:14:07 -0800, "
>> > wrote:
>
>
>> >Yawn.
>
>> More shades of Arnie.
>
> It's funny how you can only see posts in terms of 'Arny' and 'not Arny'.
>
>
Arny
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
Clyde Slick
March 11th 06, 03:18 PM
"Steven Sullivan" > wrote in message
...
> paul packer > wrote:
>> On 11 Mar 2006 00:14:07 -0800, "
>> > wrote:
>
>
>> >Yawn.
>
>> More shades of Arnie.
>
> It's funny how you can only see posts in terms of 'Arny' and 'not Arny'.
>
>
on seconf thought, you'r right.
'Sully'
You have now received status as an immortal.
Happy?
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
Robert Morein wrote:
> I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
> intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
> like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His posts
> are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
> substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are significantly
> different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
> presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
> logical thought.
>
> I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
> nothing else, it is very interesting.
Its not Eastern philosophy, but it doesn't matter what you believe the
effect is based on. What matters is that you opened your mind a little
enough to actually try drawing the L-shape, and you've heard the
improvements that it brings. That's more than I can say for anyone else
here on this group of "narrow-minded ignorant swine" (tm). I can get
into all the theories behind the phenomenon of the L-shape, but I feel
that people here get their knickers too wrapped up in theory, and lose
focus of what's important. Which is that no matter what theory an audio
device is based on, you either hear it or you don't.
It's clear to me that you haven't properly understood the theory as I
explained it to you, having veered toward the East as you have, to look
for answers that provide reasoning for phenomena you don't quite
understand. But the point is, you didn't have to understand it in order
to have heard the positive effects it brought to your listening
experience. If people have a curiousity about how it works after
they've tried it, well they can consult the website I gave you. But it
makes no sense to argue theories until you know whether the concept
works for you or not. Otherwise it's a pointless academic excercise.
The amazing thing about the L-shape is that, as you know, you don't
just have to apply it to CDs. In fact, your idea of applying it to the
shelving in your room and the front baffle of your loudspeakers are
ones that even I haven't tried! So thanks for the tip, Robert! Helping
each other out by sharing good ideas like that is what makes us an
audio *community*. A nice little change from a perpetual ideological
war, dont you think? ;-)
Robert Morein
March 11th 06, 05:57 PM
I am a bit surprised by the statements below that I have tried his methods.
I have not, nor do I endorse them. I had a discussion with Soundhaspriority
in which he disclosed the considerable thought he has invested in his
beliefs. Consequently, I concluded he is not a troll, but rather, a sincere
individual.
Also,
>In fact, your idea of applying it to the
> shelving in your room and the front baffle of your loudspeakers are
> ones that even I haven't tried! So thanks for the tip, Robert! "
is a fabrication. I have not done this either.
Assuming it is not a forgery, I do not understand why Soundhaspriority would
deliberately undermine his credibility.
> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
>
>> I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
>> intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I
>> would
>> like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His
>> posts
>> are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
>> substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are
>> significantly
>> different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
>> presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
>> logical thought.
>>
>> I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
>> nothing else, it is very interesting.
>
> Its not Eastern philosophy, but it doesn't matter what you believe the
> effect is based on. What matters is that you opened your mind a little
> enough to actually try drawing the L-shape, and you've heard the
> improvements that it brings.
I did not do this. Nor can I claim that I opened my mind except to the
extent that I tried to understand where Soundhasprioity is "coming from."
That's more than I can say for anyone else
> here on this group of "narrow-minded ignorant swine" (tm). I can get
> into all the theories behind the phenomenon of the L-shape, but I feel
> that people here get their knickers too wrapped up in theory, and lose
> focus of what's important. Which is that no matter what theory an audio
> device is based on, you either hear it or you don't.
>
> It's clear to me that you haven't properly understood the theory as I
> explained it to you, having veered toward the East as you have, to look
> for answers that provide reasoning for phenomena you don't quite
> understand. But the point is, you didn't have to understand it in order
> to have heard the positive effects it brought to your listening
> experience. If people have a curiousity about how it works after
> they've tried it, well they can consult the website I gave you. But it
> makes no sense to argue theories until you know whether the concept
> works for you or not. Otherwise it's a pointless academic excercise.
> The amazing thing about the L-shape is that, as you know, you don't
> just have to apply it to CDs.
I did not do this:
> In fact, your idea of applying it to the
> shelving in your room and the front baffle of your loudspeakers are
> ones that even I haven't tried! So thanks for the tip, Robert! Helping
> each other out by sharing good ideas like that is what makes us an
> audio *community*. A nice little change from a perpetual ideological
> war, dont you think? ;-)
>
wrote:
> wrote:
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Robert Morein wrote:
> >
> > > > I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
> > > > intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
> > > > like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His posts
> > > > are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
> > > > substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are significantly
> > > > different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
> > > > presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
> > > > logical thought.
> > > >
> > > > I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
> > > > nothing else, it is very interesting.
> > >
> > > Wow, a glowing endorsement from nowhere.
> >
> > Look who's talking! He uses his real name, at least. You have a
> > meaningless email address. He may be from nowhere, but you're
> > _nothing_. I'd rather be nowhere, than be you, you little ankle-biter.
> > No one cares what you have to say on this group, that much I've been
> > able to determine. Least of all me, which is why I ignore most of your
> > posts, 99% of which are trying to troll me. All we see is one angry
> > rant after another from you, toward me. And every time I see another
> > one of your angry diatribes for me, I laugh at you some more. Geez,
> > even your attack threads against me went.... guess where? Yup,
> > "nowhere". LOL!
> >
> > Here's a funny fact for you to chew on: You think I'm a crook, you
> > think I'm a liar, you think I'm nuts, you think I have nothing valid to
> > say, etc etc. And yet you're constantly on my ass, stalking me, writing
> > messages about me, either to me or to others - like you have nothing
> > better to do with your life. So either you have a sick little obsession
> > with me, or you're in love with me. Which is it, ankle-biter?
> >
> > > He's welcome to post some of the elaboration on the
> > > Eastern framework of his logical thought.
> >
> > Stop right there. You are now quoting Mr. Morein's opinion of what the
> > ideas are based on. I don't happen to agree with Robert on that. I have
> > no reason to, the inventor is a Westerner, his inspiration is a
> > Westerner, the sciences involved are Western sciences. Those are all
> > facts. But you believed what Mr. Morein told you, simply because you
> > didn't see a reason not to believe it. You know who else does that,
> > westface? Sheep. Sheep and lemming. Welcome to the herd, you mindless
> > lemming.
> >
> > You just learned your first lesson about how not to be a sheep,
> > grasshopper. Remember it.
> >
> > > Grasshopper is welcome to demonstrate his mastery, perhaps
> > > perform accupunture on some electrolytics.
> >
> > No fool. You're still confused. I'm Master Po. You're little
> > Grasshopper. I do peform accupuncture on electrolytics. I have
> > described my methods to Sander deWaal, if anyone wishes to learn from
> > them. Now, back to you. You're a non-thinking Western fool with a
> > severely blocked mind. I couldn't break open your closed mind with
> > gelignite. And it'd be foolish of me to try. "Wasted energy". I have no
> > energy to waste on worthless fools. I put ideas out in the universe. If
> > you want to learn from them, waste the energy yourself, by trying the
> > ideas. If you're not interested in trying the ideas, then there is no
> > reason to be asking how they work, and this conversation is over.
> >
> > > The guy that shot Lennon was demonstrating cogency in his
> > > beliefs too.
> >
> > Speaking of which, I see that you haven't yet threatened me with a gun
> > in this thread. So far. I guess that'll come later, when I'm really
> > ****ing you off.
>
> And his real name is:
> Cpt. Courageous ;Charles Butler ;Giddeon ;Bimbam the clown ;N/A ;
> nobody ; Nowhere Man ;John S.;Nomad ;Odysseus ;Black Frank ;
> {Powell} ;Nestor Makhno ;Too sh*t ;Jawed Ashraf ;Mr. E;ObiCat ;
> Mark Little ;Edwin ;taco;Toshi;Proudwhitekraut ;Migwat ;Mukul Paithane
> ;
> Baffer ;Electr0Static ;Mr. Legend ;Simon Egli ;Upenn ;Maegnuz ;
> Rod Speed's Mother ;Gavin Cato ;Mauricio & Marisa ;Laura ;
> Blipster ;Hollow Man ;Kenny Lingus ;Andy Bolstridge ;sook me auf ;
> Rune Halvorsen ;RuudM ;Sean Sharkey ;rdrast ;Mick ;Earl Kiosterud ;
> Newps ;DelphiDude ;Tim Conway ;Andy Bolstridge
> ;etc,etc,etc,etc..........
I see I'm not the first contributor that you've taken an obsession to.
> Your validation methodology needs a bit of fine tuning.
Look who's talking, ya dirty hypocrite. The same closed-minded ignorant
twit who couldn't stop ridiculing the tweaks I posted, but never
bothered to try a single one.
Oh no, put the gun away! I take it back, okay?! I swear, the only
reason I called you a diry hypocrite, is because you are one!
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 11th 06, 06:17 PM
On 11 Mar 2006 09:31:27 -0800, wrote:
>
>Robert Morein wrote:
>
>> I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
>> intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
>> like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His posts
>> are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
>> substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are significantly
>> different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
>> presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
>> logical thought.
>>
>> I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
>> nothing else, it is very interesting.
>
>Its not Eastern philosophy, but it doesn't matter what you believe the
>effect is based on. What matters is that you opened your mind a little
>enough to actually try drawing the L-shape, and you've heard the
>improvements that it brings. That's more than I can say for anyone else
>here on this group of "narrow-minded ignorant swine" (tm). I can get
>into all the theories behind the phenomenon of the L-shape, but I feel
>that people here get their knickers too wrapped up in theory, and lose
>focus of what's important. Which is that no matter what theory an audio
>device is based on, you either hear it or you don't.
>
>It's clear to me that you haven't properly understood the theory as I
>explained it to you, having veered toward the East as you have, to look
>for answers that provide reasoning for phenomena you don't quite
>understand. But the point is, you didn't have to understand it in order
>to have heard the positive effects it brought to your listening
>experience. If people have a curiousity about how it works after
>they've tried it, well they can consult the website I gave you. But it
>makes no sense to argue theories until you know whether the concept
>works for you or not. Otherwise it's a pointless academic excercise.
>The amazing thing about the L-shape is that, as you know, you don't
>just have to apply it to CDs. In fact, your idea of applying it to the
>shelving in your room and the front baffle of your loudspeakers are
>ones that even I haven't tried! So thanks for the tip, Robert! Helping
>each other out by sharing good ideas like that is what makes us an
>audio *community*. A nice little change from a perpetual ideological
>war, dont you think? ;-)
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/newsletter/yahoo_digest/Digest_pt06.htm
"We therefore chose the words "Sound has Priority" to 'tap into' that
specific Morphic resonance energy pattern which existed before the
sense of sight developed. Obviously, we were concentrating on
achieving improvements in the perception of sound whereas V.R. Sola's
friend's daughter was obviously concentrating more on improving their
overall feeling of well being.
Kind Regards,
May "
"So, via the link below, to add some humour, is a photograph of me,
today, braving the elements to fulfill our promise to make 'same day'
dispatch on 99.99% of orders.
May
JPG is 436kB
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg "
Robert Morein wrote:
> I am a bit surprised by the statements below that I have tried his methods.
> I have not, nor do I endorse them. I had a discussion with Soundhaspriority
> in which he disclosed the considerable thought he has invested in his
> beliefs. Consequently, I concluded he is not a troll, but rather, a sincere
> individual.
>
> Also,
> >In fact, your idea of applying it to the
> > shelving in your room and the front baffle of your loudspeakers are
> > ones that even I haven't tried! So thanks for the tip, Robert! "
>
> is a fabrication. I have not done this either.
Huh? I thought you were proud of the fact that you found a new
application for the L-shape on your own, thus surpassing even my
knowledge as to how it can be applied. I don't know why you're denying
it now. You're even denying that you are open minded in this reply of
yours, which I find quite strange? And here I thought we had made so
much progress together! If you didn't want me to admit to anyone that
you had tried the L-shape and found that it improved your sound, you
should have been clear with me about that. But I'm sorry if I didn't
realize this on my own. And the reason I didn't, is that I don't see
what the problem is in admitting saying that myself. I mean its just a
drawing, for pete's sake!
As I've always said, if it works it works, if it doesn't it doesn't.
What's the big deal? It's not like you were engaging in Satanic
practices, by drawing shapes on your CDs! But then I realize now that I
don't know the history you have here, and I don't even pretend to
understand what everyone's hang up is over trying little things like
drawing special shapes on their CDs, if it can at all help. To me,
being open-minded is nothing to be ashamed of, but everyone has their
own standards of behaviour, don't they. So if I embarassed you then
again, I apologize. I'll know better in the future.
Goofball_star_dot_etal wote:
> On 11 Mar 2006 09:31:27 -0800, wrote:
>
> "We therefore chose the words "Sound has Priority" to 'tap into' that
> specific Morphic resonance energy pattern which existed before the
> sense of sight developed.
I told you that my name had meaning, didn't I, goofball? I told you
that it's a self-contained tweak, that alone can help improve your
sound, if you have the right materials. I find it interesting that you
would go to all the trouble to research my name, but you wouldn't
bother to take 30 seconds to see if any of my tweaks actually work!
And you wonder why I call you an ignorant sheep? Hmm.....
I'll say it again, like I, you chose your name well.
Robert Morein
March 11th 06, 06:50 PM
I don't understand why you did this. We had a conversation in which you
showed me the considerable thought behind your beliefs, and I accorded you
my respect. That is all. You chose to misstate the conversation which we
had, and include a fabrication. First you gain credit, and then you
discredit yourself.
> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
>
>> I am a bit surprised by the statements below that I have tried his
>> methods.
>> I have not, nor do I endorse them. I had a discussion with
>> Soundhaspriority
>> in which he disclosed the considerable thought he has invested in his
>> beliefs. Consequently, I concluded he is not a troll, but rather, a
>> sincere
>> individual.
>>
>> Also,
>> >In fact, your idea of applying it to the
>> > shelving in your room and the front baffle of your loudspeakers are
>> > ones that even I haven't tried! So thanks for the tip, Robert! "
>>
>> is a fabrication. I have not done this either.
>
> Huh? I thought you were proud of the fact that you found a new
> application for the L-shape on your own, thus surpassing even my
> knowledge as to how it can be applied. I don't know why you're denying
> it now. You're even denying that you are open minded in this reply of
> yours, which I find quite strange? And here I thought we had made so
> much progress together! If you didn't want me to admit to anyone that
> you had tried the L-shape and found that it improved your sound, you
> should have been clear with me about that. But I'm sorry if I didn't
> realize this on my own. And the reason I didn't, is that I don't see
> what the problem is in admitting saying that myself. I mean its just a
> drawing, for pete's sake!
>
> As I've always said, if it works it works, if it doesn't it doesn't.
> What's the big deal? It's not like you were engaging in Satanic
> practices, by drawing shapes on your CDs! But then I realize now that I
> don't know the history you have here, and I don't even pretend to
> understand what everyone's hang up is over trying little things like
> drawing special shapes on their CDs, if it can at all help. To me,
> being open-minded is nothing to be ashamed of, but everyone has their
> own standards of behaviour, don't they. So if I embarassed you then
> again, I apologize. I'll know better in the future.
>
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 11th 06, 06:55 PM
On 11 Mar 2006 10:45:48 -0800, wrote:
>
>Goofball_star_dot_etal wote:
>
>> On 11 Mar 2006 09:31:27 -0800, wrote:
>>
>> "We therefore chose the words "Sound has Priority" to 'tap into' that
>> specific Morphic resonance energy pattern which existed before the
>> sense of sight developed.
>
>
>I told you that my name had meaning, didn't I, goofball? I told you
>that it's a self-contained tweak, that alone can help improve your
>sound, if you have the right materials. I find it interesting that you
>would go to all the trouble to research my name, but you wouldn't
>bother to take 30 seconds to see if any of my tweaks actually work!
>And you wonder why I call you an ignorant sheep? Hmm.....
>
>I'll say it again, like I, you chose your name well.
I am only half sheep (on my mother's side)
Anyhow you have been rumbled spamming a newsgroup, you tough old bird.
Take care and leave now, before someone takes offense.
wrote:
> wrote:
>
> > wrote:
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Robert Morein wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I have been involved in a private discussion with Soundhaspriority. I
> > > > > intend to preserve the confidentiality of this discussion. However, I would
> > > > > like to tell you that it is my impression that he is not a troll. His posts
> > > > > are not mischief; they are expressions of deeply held beliefs, with
> > > > > substantial philosophy behind them. While our viewpoints are significantly
> > > > > different, I accord him my respect, due to the cogency with which he
> > > > > presents his beliefs, which stem from outside the Western framework of
> > > > > logical thought.
> > > > >
> > > > > I encourage him to post some of the elaboration he has provided to me. If
> > > > > nothing else, it is very interesting.
> > > >
> > > > Wow, a glowing endorsement from nowhere.
> > >
> > > Look who's talking! He uses his real name, at least. You have a
> > > meaningless email address. He may be from nowhere, but you're
> > > _nothing_. I'd rather be nowhere, than be you, you little ankle-biter.
> > > No one cares what you have to say on this group, that much I've been
> > > able to determine. Least of all me, which is why I ignore most of your
> > > posts, 99% of which are trying to troll me. All we see is one angry
> > > rant after another from you, toward me. And every time I see another
> > > one of your angry diatribes for me, I laugh at you some more. Geez,
> > > even your attack threads against me went.... guess where? Yup,
> > > "nowhere". LOL!
> > >
> > > Here's a funny fact for you to chew on: You think I'm a crook, you
> > > think I'm a liar, you think I'm nuts, you think I have nothing valid to
> > > say, etc etc. And yet you're constantly on my ass, stalking me, writing
> > > messages about me, either to me or to others - like you have nothing
> > > better to do with your life. So either you have a sick little obsession
> > > with me, or you're in love with me. Which is it, ankle-biter?
> > >
> > > > He's welcome to post some of the elaboration on the
> > > > Eastern framework of his logical thought.
> > >
> > > Stop right there. You are now quoting Mr. Morein's opinion of what the
> > > ideas are based on. I don't happen to agree with Robert on that. I have
> > > no reason to, the inventor is a Westerner, his inspiration is a
> > > Westerner, the sciences involved are Western sciences. Those are all
> > > facts. But you believed what Mr. Morein told you, simply because you
> > > didn't see a reason not to believe it. You know who else does that,
> > > westface? Sheep. Sheep and lemming. Welcome to the herd, you mindless
> > > lemming.
> > >
> > > You just learned your first lesson about how not to be a sheep,
> > > grasshopper. Remember it.
> > >
> > > > Grasshopper is welcome to demonstrate his mastery, perhaps
> > > > perform accupunture on some electrolytics.
> > >
> > > No fool. You're still confused. I'm Master Po. You're little
> > > Grasshopper. I do peform accupuncture on electrolytics. I have
> > > described my methods to Sander deWaal, if anyone wishes to learn from
> > > them. Now, back to you. You're a non-thinking Western fool with a
> > > severely blocked mind. I couldn't break open your closed mind with
> > > gelignite. And it'd be foolish of me to try. "Wasted energy". I have no
> > > energy to waste on worthless fools. I put ideas out in the universe. If
> > > you want to learn from them, waste the energy yourself, by trying the
> > > ideas. If you're not interested in trying the ideas, then there is no
> > > reason to be asking how they work, and this conversation is over.
> > >
> > > > The guy that shot Lennon was demonstrating cogency in his
> > > > beliefs too.
> > >
> > > Speaking of which, I see that you haven't yet threatened me with a gun
> > > in this thread. So far. I guess that'll come later, when I'm really
> > > ****ing you off.
> >
> > And his real name is:
> > Cpt. Courageous ;Charles Butler ;Giddeon ;Bimbam the clown ;N/A ;
> > nobody ; Nowhere Man ;John S.;Nomad ;Odysseus ;Black Frank ;
> > {Powell} ;Nestor Makhno ;Too sh*t ;Jawed Ashraf ;Mr. E;ObiCat ;
> > Mark Little ;Edwin ;taco;Toshi;Proudwhitekraut ;Migwat ;Mukul Paithane
> > ;
> > Baffer ;Electr0Static ;Mr. Legend ;Simon Egli ;Upenn ;Maegnuz ;
> > Rod Speed's Mother ;Gavin Cato ;Mauricio & Marisa ;Laura ;
> > Blipster ;Hollow Man ;Kenny Lingus ;Andy Bolstridge ;sook me auf ;
> > Rune Halvorsen ;RuudM ;Sean Sharkey ;rdrast ;Mick ;Earl Kiosterud ;
> > Newps ;DelphiDude ;Tim Conway ;Andy Bolstridge
> > ;etc,etc,etc,etc..........
>
> I see I'm not the first contributor that you've taken an obsession to.
>
> > Your validation methodology needs a bit of fine tuning.
>
> Look who's talking, ya dirty hypocrite. The same closed-minded ignorant
> twit who couldn't stop ridiculing the tweaks I posted, but never
> bothered to try a single one.
>
> Oh no, put the gun away! I take it back, okay?! I swear, the only
> reason I called you a diry hypocrite, is because you are one!
If showing you how many names are attributed to the
" address is a hypocrasy,
then everything you've put forth, every contradictory
statement, every insult, the very basis of your conceptual
being must be the Motherlode.
Don't confuse unwillingness to be abused into no longer
pointing to the inconsistancies of your posts,
with an obsession.
Pointing to an error is not ridicule, unless being wrong
humiliates you.
Watching you backpeddle from one inconsistancy to
another is reward enough in itself.
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 11th 06, 07:07 PM
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:50:31 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:
>I don't understand why you did this. We had a conversation in which you
>showed me the considerable thought behind your beliefs, and I accorded you
>my respect. That is all. You chose to misstate the conversation which we
>had, and include a fabrication. First you gain credit, and then you
>discredit yourself.
You can't even trust little old ladies these days..
Robert Morein
March 11th 06, 07:43 PM
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:50:31 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>>I don't understand why you did this. We had a conversation in which you
>>showed me the considerable thought behind your beliefs, and I accorded you
>>my respect. That is all. You chose to misstate the conversation which we
>>had, and include a fabrication. First you gain credit, and then you
>>discredit yourself.
>
> You can't even trust little old ladies these days..
Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
post in far subtler ways.
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 11th 06, 07:46 PM
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:43:18 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:
>
>"Goofball_star_dot_etal" > wrote in message
...
>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:50:31 -0500, "Robert Morein"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>I don't understand why you did this. We had a conversation in which you
>>>showed me the considerable thought behind your beliefs, and I accorded you
>>>my respect. That is all. You chose to misstate the conversation which we
>>>had, and include a fabrication. First you gain credit, and then you
>>>discredit yourself.
>>
>> You can't even trust little old ladies these days..
>
>Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
>post in far subtler ways.
>
I think he is a she.
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:43:18 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"Goofball_star_dot_etal" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:50:31 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>>I don't understand why you did this. We had a conversation in which you
> >>>showed me the considerable thought behind your beliefs, and I accorded you
> >>>my respect. That is all. You chose to misstate the conversation which we
> >>>had, and include a fabrication. First you gain credit, and then you
> >>>discredit yourself.
> >>
> >> You can't even trust little old ladies these days..
> >
> >Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
> >post in far subtler ways.
> >
>
> I think he is a she.
Do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 11th 06, 08:25 PM
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
>do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
>Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
>They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
George M. Middius
March 11th 06, 09:25 PM
Robert Morein said:
> Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
> post in far subtler ways.
Assuming he is sane, you might be right about that. However, the evidence
from his posts casts doubt on that assumption.
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
>
> >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
> >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
> >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
>
> Probably not your type..
> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
> See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.
Steven Sullivan
March 11th 06, 09:50 PM
Goofball_star_dot_etal > wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:43:18 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
> >
> >"Goofball_star_dot_etal" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:50:31 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>>I don't understand why you did this. We had a conversation in which you
> >>>showed me the considerable thought behind your beliefs, and I accorded you
> >>>my respect. That is all. You chose to misstate the conversation which we
> >>>had, and include a fabrication. First you gain credit, and then you
> >>>discredit yourself.
> >>
> >> You can't even trust little old ladies these days..
> >
> >Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
> >post in far subtler ways.
> >
> I think he is a she.
and she said hey babe, take a walk on the wild side
--
-S
"If men were angels, no government would be necessary." - James Madison (1788)
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 11th 06, 10:05 PM
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:25:05 -0500, George M. Middius <cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote:
>
>
>Robert Morein said:
>
>> Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
>> post in far subtler ways.
>
>Assuming he is sane, you might be right about that. However, the evidence
>from his posts casts doubt on that assumption.
>
Are my posts not getting through?
This is Soundhaspriority, believe it or not:
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
Either that or Peter is letting May carry the can.
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 11th 06, 10:18 PM
On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:
>
>Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
>> On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
>>
>> >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
>> >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
>> >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
>>
>> Probably not your type..
>> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
>> See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
>
>I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
>when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
>with his/her own.
Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:
>
> >
> >Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> >> On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
> >>
> >> >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
> >> >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
> >> >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
> >>
> >> Probably not your type..
> >> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
> >> See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
> >
> >I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
> >when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
> >with his/her own.
>
> Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
Well.............................................. ...
I
I
I
~
Jenn
March 11th 06, 10:50 PM
In article >,
Goofball_star_dot_etal > wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:
>
> >
> >Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> >> On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
> >>
> >> >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
> >> >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
> >> >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
> >>
> >> Probably not your type..
> >> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
> >> See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
> >
> >I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
> >when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
> >with his/her own.
>
> Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
Hmph.....
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 11th 06, 11:01 PM
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:50:40 GMT, Jenn >
wrote:
>> Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
>
>Hmph.....
Sorry, I will rearrange my brain one more time.
Jenn wrote:
> In article >,
> Goofball_star_dot_etal > wrote:
>
> > On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> > >> On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
> > >> >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
> > >> >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
> > >>
> > >> Probably not your type..
> > >> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
> > >> See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
> > >
> > >I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
> > >when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
> > >with his/her own.
> >
> > Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
>
> Hmph.....
Didn't mean any disrespect,
was referring to classic SNL bit.
I think they were doing an Arnold parody.
Will try to resist using vintage media references
in the future. Hard to find comedy that doesn't
offend all demographics.
George M. Middius
March 12th 06, 01:14 AM
said:
> > > Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
> > Hmph.....
> Didn't mean any disrespect,
> was referring to classic SNL bit.
> I think they were doing an Arnold parody.
Maybe you meant to say, "Jenn, you ignorant slut!"
Jenn
March 12th 06, 01:15 AM
In article . com>,
wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
> > In article >,
> > Goofball_star_dot_etal > wrote:
> >
> > > On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> > > >> On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
> > > >> >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
> > > >> >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
> > > >>
> > > >> Probably not your type..
> > > >> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
> > > >> See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
> > > >
> > > >I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
> > > >when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
> > > >with his/her own.
> > >
> > > Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
> >
> > Hmph.....
>
> Didn't mean any disrespect,
> was referring to classic SNL bit.
> I think they were doing an Arnold parody.
> Will try to resist using vintage media references
> in the future. Hard to find comedy that doesn't
> offend all demographics.
Just razzin' ya ;-)
Jenn wrote:
> In article . com>,
> wrote:
>
> > Jenn wrote:
> > > In article >,
> > > Goofball_star_dot_etal > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> > > > >> On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
> > > > >> >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
> > > > >> >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Probably not your type..
> > > > >> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
> > > > >> See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
> > > > >
> > > > >I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
> > > > >when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
> > > > >with his/her own.
> > > >
> > > > Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
> > >
> > > Hmph.....
> >
> > Didn't mean any disrespect,
> > was referring to classic SNL bit.
> > I think they were doing an Arnold parody.
> > Will try to resist using vintage media references
> > in the future. Hard to find comedy that doesn't
> > offend all demographics.
>
> Just razzin' ya ;-)
Got me :-)
I'm working with the ASQ next month.
Strings rule.
Jenn
March 12th 06, 01:29 AM
In article m>,
wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
> > In article . com>,
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Jenn wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > Goofball_star_dot_etal > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 11 Mar 2006 13:30:24 -0800, wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> > > > > >> On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
> > > > > >> >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
> > > > > >> >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Probably not your type..
> > > > > >> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
> > > > > >> See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
> > > > > >when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
> > > > > >with his/her own.
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
> > > >
> > > > Hmph.....
> > >
> > > Didn't mean any disrespect,
> > > was referring to classic SNL bit.
> > > I think they were doing an Arnold parody.
> > > Will try to resist using vintage media references
> > > in the future. Hard to find comedy that doesn't
> > > offend all demographics.
> >
> > Just razzin' ya ;-)
>
> Got me :-)
> I'm working with the ASQ next month.
> Strings rule.
Cool! What do you do?
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 12th 06, 08:53 AM
On 11 Mar 2006 23:45:44 -0800, wrote:
>
>George M. Middius wrote:
>
>> Robert Morein said:
>>
>> > Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
>> > post in far subtler ways.
>>
>> Assuming he is sane, you might be right about that. However, the evidence
>> from his posts casts doubt on that assumption.
>
>Having tried one of my tweaks, how sane does that make you?! LOL! Well,
>at least you and Robert now share something in common. You both tried
>my tweaks, and you're both too gutless to admit it! You audiophile
>dilletantes are a funny bunch, I'll give you that.
Do I detect a note of contempt for your customers?
Goofball_star_dot_etal and his secret decoder ring wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2006 09:31:27 -0800, wrote:
>
> >
> >Robert Morein wrote:
> "We therefore chose the words "Sound has Priority" to 'tap into' that
> specific Morphic resonance energy pattern which existed before the
> sense of sight developed. Obviously, we were concentrating on
> achieving improvements in the perception of sound whereas V.R. Sola's
> friend's daughter was obviously concentrating more on improving their
> overall feeling of well being.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> May "
>
> "So, via the link below, to add some humour, is a photograph of me,
> today, braving the elements to fulfill our promise to make 'same day'
> dispatch on 99.99% of orders.
>
> May
>
> JPG is 436kB
>
> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg "
Oh my God, you're brilliant. How on EARTH did you find me out?! I
really don't know what you're doing wasting your life on this board,
when a net detective talent like yours should be out finding and
hauling Osama Bin Laden's ass into court.
By the way, I had my "guys" check into it, and found that your real
name is Brian Peppers. Although you LOOK just like your fake usenet
name, "Goofball". And your picture has been posted here:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/peppers.asp
Goofball aka "Brian Peppers", wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2006 10:45:48 -0800, wrote:
>
> >
> >Goofball_star_dot_etal wote:
> >
> >> On 11 Mar 2006 09:31:27 -0800, wrote:
> >>
> >And you wonder why I call you an ignorant sheep? Hmm.....
>
> I am only half sheep (on my mother's side)
Sorry, that's not what your behaviour shows. You're all sheep and part
lemming. Look in the mirror again, fruitcake:
It reflects back to you all of the qualities you have shown in your
posts:
paranoia
malevolence
stupidity
arrogance
intolerance
hypocrisy
deceit
closed-mindedness
ignorance
There is absolutely NOTHING that you do different and no way that you
think any different than anyone here.
> Anyhow you have been rumbled spamming a newsgroup, you tough old bird.
I have NO idea what you just said. Could someone translate this for me
from the original "Goofbalese"?
> Take care and leave now, before someone takes offense.
Oh my God, you're a riot! If people actually left the group because
they took offense at you, there'd be just you and me left. Speaking of
which, I was just on my way out until I read this. Now, I think I'm
going to stay forever.
By the way, the next time you get your picture taken Brian, you should
try to smile and look presentable. Or, are you smiling?....
http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/peppers.asp
Goofball_star_dot_etal aka "Brian Peppers" wrote, believe it or not:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:25:05 -0500, George M. Middius <cmndr
> [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote:
> Are my posts not getting through?
> This is Soundhaspriority, believe it or not:
> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
So what do you call this flame war tactic? "Proof by tirade", you
basket of beans? Was it before or after rearranging your brains, that
you came up with this risible sack of crap, after spending your time
scouring half the net for some trace of me? Well I think I'm gonna
choose "not". So show valid, supportable evidence that I'm the person
in the photo. Otherwise, I've once again proven you're a lying,
deceitful, ranting idiot.
While you're at it, how about you prove that you're NOT the person in
this photo, Brian:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/peppers.asp
Robert Morein wrote:
> "Goofball_star_dot_etal" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:50:31 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>I don't understand why you did this. We had a conversation in which you
> >>showed me the considerable thought behind your beliefs, and I accorded you
> >>my respect. That is all. You chose to misstate the conversation which we
> >>had, and include a fabrication. First you gain credit, and then you
> >>discredit yourself.
> >
> > You can't even trust little old ladies these days..
>
> Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
> post in far subtler ways.
LOL! Such as? Trading your post in for Air Miles? ROTFLMAO! Methinks
you think much too highly of yourself and your posts, Mr. Morein. And
you know that all this high drama of yours is not good for your blood
pressure.
Goofball_star_dot_etal aka "Brian Peppers" blurted out:
> I think he is a she.
On the other hand... I'm still wondering what the heck YOU are, Mr.
Pepeprs...
http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/peppers.asp
wrote:
> Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> > On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
> >
> > >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
> > >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
> > >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
> >
> > Probably not your type..
> > http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
> > See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
>
> I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
> when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
> with his/her own.
Whereas you just threaten people with a gun. Somehow, that's better.
But even so, you started attacking me before I ever noticed your teeth
having a death grip on my ankles. And you never let up. Why? Because my
opinions and observations are not aligned with your own, whatever you
are. You made all sorts of ad hominem attacks in your busy days of
trolling me, and then you whine about me doing that to you? Right!
Hypocritical much, westface?
Another interesting piece of hypocrisy to point out in your deeply
flawed persona. You just made the assumption that because some dork
found a picture on the net, then declared it was me, that this claim
must be correct. That's why I call you and your RAO associates
"non-thinkers", or "sheep". You never paused for a moment to ask what
Goofball's proof is that I'm the person in the photo, and whether that
proof was valid. So because you just spoon-feed information that YOU
happen to think is credible, you end up being even more of an ignorant
fool than before you got "educated".
It is to note, because it is exactly how self-professed "objectivists"
on usenet develop their core belief system. While paying lip service to
science, you people have no respect for scientific principles or
values. Instead, everything you know about audio, is everything you
know about me from that photo that Goofball pulled out of his arse. You
don't question what you're told, you just believe what you're told.
That's also why it's pointless to debate someone as stupid as you. If
you don't trust the source, you don't believe it. If you do trust the
source, you believe it blindly. Even if it isn't true.
wrote:
> wrote:
>
> > Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> > > On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
> > >
> > > >do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
> > > >Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
> > > >They wanted to Pump Up the sound.
> > >
> > > Probably not your type..
> > > http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
> > > See my and her/his posts below in this thread.
> >
> > I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
> > when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
> > with his/her own.
>
> Whereas you just threaten people with a gun. Somehow, that's better.
> But even so, you started attacking me before I ever noticed your teeth
> having a death grip on my ankles. And you never let up. Why? Because my
> opinions and observations are not aligned with your own, whatever you
> are. You made all sorts of ad hominem attacks in your busy days of
> trolling me, and then you whine about me doing that to you? Right!
> Hypocritical much, westface?
>
> Another interesting piece of hypocrisy to point out in your deeply
> flawed persona. You just made the assumption that because some dork
> found a picture on the net, then declared it was me, that this claim
> must be correct. That's why I call you and your RAO associates
> "non-thinkers", or "sheep". You never paused for a moment to ask what
> Goofball's proof is that I'm the person in the photo, and whether that
> proof was valid. So because you just spoon-feed information that YOU
> happen to think is credible, you end up being even more of an ignorant
> fool than before you got "educated".
>
> It is to note, because it is exactly how self-professed "objectivists"
> on usenet develop their core belief system. While paying lip service to
> science, you people have no respect for scientific principles or
> values. Instead, everything you know about audio, is everything you
> know about me from that photo that Goofball pulled out of his arse. You
> don't question what you're told, you just believe what you're told.
> That's also why it's pointless to debate someone as stupid as you. If
> you don't trust the source, you don't believe it. If you do trust the
> source, you believe it blindly. Even if it isn't true.
Since you never validate any of the claims you make,
how can you be so bold as to call the information posted
false? That last post about Goofball_star_dot_etal shows what a
class act you are.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/9dffb811e0f76d26?hl=en&
You still keep touting that gun fallacy about me yet it was you that
brought the firearm into the discussion with me:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/02fa70dbc21bac98?hl=en&
Who could forget this memorable post of yours:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/f2ff76744acc4bd8?dmode=source&hl=en
You're the one with the fixation on guns, abusing anyone that
contradicts you. You definitely classed up the level of intellect
in RAO.
I'm not whining, I'm waiting for you to provide that bibliography
of
published works, or for that matter any of the points I've called you
on.
Your full of complaints of being attacked, yet all it would take is an
actual response and provide the basic information requested for those
lines of discussion to end.
With no facts, all we can do is speculate, and then you're upset with
the direction those speculations lead.
Were I actually gullible, I would have taken the first thing you wrote
as
ironclad, uncontestable, dogma.
Since your gender has come into the discussion, the way you yelp,
if you're a guy, you were ****ing out the window and it fell down.
If the level of non thinking is too high in this group, you could just
leave, but I'm going to speculate you're a masochist, and enjoying
that "abuse" and feigned victimization.
The other side of that card would be you're a misogynist or
misandrist.
George M. Middius
March 12th 06, 03:30 PM
said:
> Who could forget this memorable post of yours:
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/f2ff76744acc4bd8?dmode=source&hl=en
That was one of Shovels' few cogent posts, westie. At least up to the part
where he starts going on about Enid. What's your problem?
George M. Middius wrote:
> said:
>
> > Who could forget this memorable post of yours:
> > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/f2ff76744acc4bd8?dmode=source&hl=en
>
> That was one of Shovels' few cogent posts, westie. At least up to the part
> where he starts going on about Enid. What's your problem?
It was the gun referent I was referring to in the post.
He uses that phrasing frequently, regardless of poster.
I must admit knowing nothing of the Enid Lumley
affair in the 80's.
I ignored SHP's assertions on once again defying the
standard electrical practices, and if his statements are
factual, has created the superconducting sound system
model if all efficiencies have been maintained referenced
to contemporary practices.
The RFI/EMI shielding characteristics of 30ga. Magnet wire
certainly can't be understated.
I can't wait to see the wooden fabricated speaker surround
suspension system, non-metal voice coil windings, and
other innovations he's envisioned.
I'm definitely going to build a mud hut for my listening room
so I have no extemporaneous metallic objects in the space.
There goes the Barco Lounger :-(
George M. Middius wrote:
> said:
>
> > Who could forget this memorable post of yours:
> > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/f2ff76744acc4bd8?dmode=source&hl=en
>
> That was one of Shovels' few cogent posts, westie. At least up to the part
> where he starts going on about Enid. What's your problem?
What's _your_ problem with Enid, slick? Do you ever have an intelligent
opinion to espouse on audio, George? Now's your chance to shine....
Goofball_star_dot_etal, in a tirade of logic, wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2006 23:45:44 -0800, wrote:
>
> >
> >George M. Middius wrote:
> >
> >> Robert Morein said:
> >>
> >> > Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
> >> > post in far subtler ways.
> >>
> >> Assuming he is sane, you might be right about that. However, the evidence
> >> from his posts casts doubt on that assumption.
> >
> >Having tried one of my tweaks, how sane does that make you?! LOL! Well,
> >at least you and Robert now share something in common. You both tried
> >my tweaks, and you're both too gutless to admit it! You audiophile
> >dilletantes are a funny bunch, I'll give you that.
>
> Do I detect a note of contempt for your customers?
Ha! I was wondering what you were mumbling about again, because for a
few seconds, I forgot what a stupid presumptious imbecile you are. Oh,
but _you_ think you're a brilliant genius, don't you, Goofy? Go on,
genius. Don't continue to allude, don't conjecture, don't talk out of
the side of your crooked mouth. Just show us solid, irrefutable
evidence that I have a business of any kind.
Because so far, you're astounding me with your brilliant logical
deductions. As the facts stand, not a single person showed interest in
trying in of the tweaks I posted. So even if I did have a business as
you allege, what kind of an idiot would you have to be to presume that
I'm trying not to alienate my potential "customers" on RAO from buying
expensive tweako freako products from me, when they're not even
interested in FREE tweaks? LOL! What makes me laugh even harder, is
that _you're_ supposed to be the smartest mind here!!! ROTFLMFAO!!
I detect more than note of contempt for anyone that has anything to do
with tweaks. Because _you_ had a failed tweak business, and admitted
you were bitter about it!
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:50:40 GMT, Jenn >
> wrote:
>
>
> >> Have you ever tried reasoning with a woman...
> >
> >Hmph.....
>
> Sorry, I will rearrange my brain one more time.
Are you sure you can reach that far up your arse to get it?
MINe 109
March 12th 06, 10:16 PM
In article . com>,
wrote:
> What's _your_ problem with Enid, slick?
Good Lord! Howard's got a sock-puppet! And a stash of old AS mags...
Stephen
Goofball_star_dot_etal
March 12th 06, 10:36 PM
On 12 Mar 2006 14:07:06 -0800, wrote:
>
>Goofball_star_dot_etal, in a tirade of logic, wrote:
>
>> On 11 Mar 2006 23:45:44 -0800, wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >George M. Middius wrote:
>> >
>> >> Robert Morein said:
>> >>
>> >> > Even for his own enjoyment, he didn't play it right. He could have used my
>> >> > post in far subtler ways.
>> >>
>> >> Assuming he is sane, you might be right about that. However, the evidence
>> >> from his posts casts doubt on that assumption.
>> >
>> >Having tried one of my tweaks, how sane does that make you?! LOL! Well,
>> >at least you and Robert now share something in common. You both tried
>> >my tweaks, and you're both too gutless to admit it! You audiophile
>> >dilletantes are a funny bunch, I'll give you that.
>>
>> Do I detect a note of contempt for your customers?
>
>Ha! I was wondering what you were mumbling about again, because for a
>few seconds, I forgot what a stupid presumptious imbecile you are. Oh,
>but _you_ think you're a brilliant genius, don't you, Goofy? Go on,
>genius.
You really sound like Benchimol now. Hmm.
>Don't continue to allude, don't conjecture, don't talk out of
>the side of your crooked mouth. Just show us solid, irrefutable
>evidence that I have a business of any kind.
>
Why don't you just tell us the truth for a change.
>Because so far, you're astounding me with your brilliant logical
>deductions. As the facts stand, not a single person showed interest in
>trying in of the tweaks I posted. So even if I did have a business as
>you allege, what kind of an idiot would you have to be to presume that
>I'm trying not to alienate my potential "customers" on RAO from buying
>expensive tweako freako products from me, when they're not even
>interested in FREE tweaks? LOL! What makes me laugh even harder, is
>that _you're_ supposed to be the smartest mind here!!! ROTFLMFAO!!
It's news to me.
>
>I detect more than note of contempt for anyone that has anything to do
>with tweaks. Because _you_ had a failed tweak business, and admitted
>you were bitter about it!
No, you misunderstood. My "tweak business" amounts to suggesting you
put an asprin on your car and drive at 100mph. with your hands tied
behind your back. Just a little test to see if your "open-mind" has
limits.
Perhaps you were thinking of my work tweaking (lasers etc.)
Perhaps you are thinking of my decision not to invest money in
obtaining audio patents and my initial disappointment in quitting -
the best decision of my life! Think what happened to sacd. Life is
sweet!
George M. Middius
March 12th 06, 11:45 PM
Shovels said:
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/f2ff76744acc4bd8?dmode=source&hl=en
> > That was one of Shovels' few cogent posts, westie. At least up to the part
> > where he starts going on about Enid. What's your problem?
> What's _your_ problem with Enid, slick? Do you ever have an intelligent
> opinion to espouse on audio, George? Now's your chance to shine....
You misunderstood me, Shovels. I meant that the part about Sillybot's
poseurism was on the money. I should have said, more precisely, that I
have no opinion on the Enid part, but the part about Stupey was cogent.
You can relax now.
George M. Middius
March 12th 06, 11:48 PM
MINe 109 said:
> > What's _your_ problem with Enid, slick?
>
> Good Lord! Howard's got a sock-puppet! And a stash of old AS mags...
I don't think Shovels is an echo of the Ferstlerian. You remember the
truism about a roomful of monkeys banging away on typewriters? That's what
I think we've got in Shovels. Sooner or later, everything will be
repeated.
wrote:
> George M. Middius wrote:
> > said:
>
> I must admit knowing nothing of the Enid Lumley
> affair in the 80's.
Thank you for sharing that revelation with us. That's only one of about
60 billion things you don't know about audio, westface.
> I ignored SHP's assertions on once again defying the
> standard electrical practices, and if his statements are
> factual, has created the superconducting sound system
> model if all efficiencies have been maintained referenced
> to contemporary practices.
Who said the tweaks have anything to do with "electrical practices" or
"contemporary practices"?
Strawman argument noted. I will continue to ignore your ignorant
presumptions, only because you are a fool, and a deceitful, abusive
troll.
> The RFI/EMI shielding characteristics of 30ga. Magnet wire
> certainly can't be understated.
Who stated the magnet wire was EMI sheilded? Blatant lie, noted.
> I can't wait to see the wooden fabricated speaker surround
> suspension system, non-metal voice coil windings, and
> other innovations he's envisioned.
Show proof that I envision such things. In absence of proof, you are
admitting that you are a deceitful liar, purposefully mischaracterizing
what people say, after having targeted them as your enemies.
> I'm definitely going to build a mud hut for my listening room
> so I have no extemporaneous metallic objects in the space.
Don't you ever get tired of me proving what a mindless, loud-mouthed
ignorant twit that you are?:
http://www.dnm.co.uk/about.html
The company's PA3 S model is considered by many in the industry to be
the finest SS amp ever made, note.
> There goes the Barco Lounger :-(
Forget about ever acheiving truly natural sound from your system.
You're a Flatlander, condemned to remain in hifi hash hell for the rest
of your ignorant life.
wrote:
> wrote:
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> > > > On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:
> > > >
> Since you never validate any of the claims you make,
> how can you be so bold as to call the information posted
> false?
YOU are the one that has _never_ validated a claim you made. I'm still
waiting for you to validate your claims that my tweaks are invalid.
> You still keep touting that gun fallacy about me yet it was you that
> brought the firearm into the discussion with me:
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/02fa70dbc21bac98?hl=en&
No, you're deliberately trying to obfuscate, which is a very deceitful
tactic you must have learned from your puppet master, Arny Krueger. In
that post, I referred to the fact that my grandfather's ear was shot
off in the war. That has nothing to do with the fact that you
threatened me at "virtual gunpoint", in another post. This was when you
were losing the audio debate with me, note.
> I'm not whining
All you do IS whine, westface. Why do you think no one reads you?
> I'm waiting for you to provide that bibliography
> of published works, or for that matter any of the points I've called you
> on.
Well I'm still waiting for you to provide that tech sheet that shows
you engineered the world's finest amplifier, and any of the other
points I've called you on.
> Your full of complaints of being attacked, yet all it would take is an
> actual response and provide the basic information requested for those
> lines of discussion to end.
You will get that when you provide the basic information requested as
to your evidence that my tweaks are not valid.
> With no facts, all we can do is speculate, and then you're upset with
> the direction those speculations lead.
Upset? Who's upset? In addition to your other fraudulent claims, are
you claiming to be a mind reader?
> Were I actually gullible, I would have taken the first thing you wrote
> as ironclad, uncontestable, dogma.
Oh you _are_ gullible, no mistaking that fact. You took the first thing
written about ABX-DBT tests, and everything that followed from that, as
fact.
You are mindless sheep, westface. A Flatlander, believing whatever
you're told to believe. I never posted anything with the intent that
people believe it simply because someone posted it (and certainly not
presented as "dogma". Dogma is not a good thing....).
Being the idiot you are, it never would occur to you to try the tweak.
No, instead you've spent hours upon hours attacking me for posting the
tweaks, but not the 30 seconds it takes to try the tweaks you
ignorantly attack. You don't have to be gullible all your life,
believing in whatever you are spoon fed. But you choose to be ignorant,
and pretend you're not. If you're interested in whether the tweaks work
or don't, you would try them. If you're not, why do you keep stalking
me, and feign interest in discussing them?
> Since your gender has come into the discussion, the way you yelp,
> if you're a guy, you were ****ing out the window and it fell down.
And you actually have the cheek to whine about me not being "classy",
or about others and their "ad hominem attacks" or "personal character
attacks" with hypocritical tripe like this? And you think people are
supposed to take you seriously?
> If the level of non thinking is too high in this group, you could just
> leave, but I'm going to speculate you're a masochist, and enjoying
> that "abuse" and feigned victimization.
"Abuse"? Hello? You are one dumb, confused little lemming, westface.
You still think after all I posted, that I actually give a tinker's
damn about people who wish to mock, ridicule, deride me, or in your
case threaten me with a gun? That I consider it "abuse"? I've never
heard of "abuse" inspiring gut-wrenching laughter, have you? I'm sorry,
but you're stupider than even I gave you credit for being. You're
giving a motley crew of slack-jawed, mindless trolls far more power and
influence than they actually have. And underestimating me by a country
mile.
> The other side of that card would be you're a misogynist or
> misandrist.
Close. I'm a philanthropist. Hence the plethora of free tweaks that I
offer the group. Confused? You will be....
> I must admit knowing nothing of the Enid Lumley
> affair in the 80's.
Thank you for sharing that revelation with us. That's only one of about
60 billion things you don't know about audio, westface.
> I ignored SHP's assertions on once again defying the
> standard electrical practices, and if his statements are
> factual, has created the superconducting sound system
> model if all efficiencies have been maintained referenced
> to contemporary practices.
Who said the tweaks have anything to do with "electrical practices" or
"contemporary practices"?
Strawman argument noted. I will continue to ignore your ignorant
presumptions, only because you are a fool, and a deceitful, abusive
troll.
> The RFI/EMI shielding characteristics of 30ga. Magnet wire
> certainly can't be understated.
Who stated the magnet wire was EMI sheilded? Blatant lie, noted.
> I can't wait to see the wooden fabricated speaker surround
> suspension system, non-metal voice coil windings, and
> other innovations he's envisioned.
Show proof that I envision such things. In absence of proof, you are
admitting that you are a deceitful liar, purposefully mischaracterizing
what people say, after having targeted them as your enemies.
> I'm definitely going to build a mud hut for my listening room
> so I have no extemporaneous metallic objects in the space.
Don't you ever get tired of me proving what a mindless, loud-mouthed
ignorant twit that you are?:
http://www.dnm.co.uk/about.html
The company's PA3 S model is considered by many in the industry to be
the finest SS amp ever made, note.
> There goes the Barco Lounger :-(
Forget about ever acheiving truly natural sound from your system.
You're a Flatlander, condemned to remain in hifi hash hell for the rest
of your ignorant life.
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2006 14:07:06 -0800, wrote:
> >Don't continue to allude, don't conjecture, don't talk out of
> >the side of your crooked mouth. Just show us solid, irrefutable
> >evidence that I have a business of any kind.
> >
> Why don't you just tell us the truth for a change.
I already did, and you proved that you wouldn't recognize the truth if
it knocked your teeth out of your head. Why don't you stop making
unfounded presumptions and passing it off as the truth, before you
talk. Every time you post anew, you claim that I'm a different person!
And I'm still waiting for you to prove I'm the woman in the photo, that
I have a business selling tweaks, and a host of other foolish
presumptious lies that you have asserted as fact.
Again, if you can't substantiate your falsehoods, you've only managed
to prove that yourself a liar, and a presumptious fool.
> No, you misunderstood. My "tweak business" amounts to suggesting you
> put an asprin on your car and drive at 100mph. with your hands tied
> behind your back. Just a little test to see if your "open-mind" has
> limits.
Why don't for once stop acting like the hypocrite you are, and start
taking your own advice? Try that little test of yours, that you would
advocate others try. You'll be helping the human race evolve a little.
The concept of an "open mind" scares the hell out of you, doesn't it?
> the best decision of my life! Think what happened to sacd. Life is
> sweet!
....so sweet, that now the most important goals you have set for
yourself in your life, is doing background research on me and tracking
me down! LOL! Yeah, that's some very sweet life you have!
For me, you're a momentary distraction at best, but even though I know
nothing of your identity, I could care less who you are. You're an
insignificant troll, that's all I need to know. God knows I'm not going
to scour the web for clues to your identity, and talk among my mates as
to the plans I have to do background research, and spend hours playing
"net detective"... as you have done over me. That tells me a lot about
just how small your life really is, Mr. "Goofball".....
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.