Log in

View Full Version : Will the silence be heard?


March 7th 06, 09:30 PM
In response to the issue of hijacking the thread, I have given those
interested to pursuing another topic the opportunity.
Not an Arny fan, but could we please keep Arny Bashing to a
minimum. It's a high milage subject.

March 7th 06, 10:49 PM
****-for-Brains wrote:
> In message . com>,
> wrote:
> >
> > In response to the issue of hijacking the thread, I have given those
> > interested to pursuing another topic the opportunity.
> > Not an Arny fan, but could we please keep Arny Bashing to a
> > minimum. It's a high milage subject.
> >
> >
> I notice Mr. Weast that, you have nothing to say about the hundred's and
> hundred's the usual Suspects. Shall I list out some of for, example Mr.
> MIdduises's grotesque crimes against me? I could easily proove that you are
> one of Atkinson's scokpuppet's. We already have a big pile of evidence to
> show Atkisnons sockpupeting is out of control. ;-)
>
> Come back when you have a clue Mr. Waste. LOl! ;-)

27 minutes and the noise ratio is already 100%
I had hopes that the thread would have done better.

Bret Ludwig
March 8th 06, 02:18 AM
No one wants to discuss anything of substance here, so what's the
problem? I'm all for serious discussion but those posts get ignored.

Michael Conzo
March 8th 06, 05:19 AM
In article googlegroups.com, "
> thusly:
> In response to the issue of hijacking the thread, I have given those
> interested to pursuing another topic the opportunity.
> Not an Arny fan, but could we please keep Arny Bashing to a
> minimum. It's a high milage subject.

I don't recall who's on what side in this blue. However there is an
extensive and detailed article in the Nov05 issue of Sound & Video
Contractor on the testing done at Harman/JBL labs. The opening of the
article discusses in depth listener training and the use of A/B/X testing as
the core of their design process.

For what its worth

March 8th 06, 05:33 AM
a écrit :

> ****-for-Brains wrote:
> > In message . com>,
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In response to the issue of hijacking the thread, I have given those
> > > interested to pursuing another topic the opportunity.
> > > Not an Arny fan, but could we please keep Arny Bashing to a
> > > minimum. It's a high milage subject.
> > >
> > >
> > I notice Mr. Weast that, you have nothing to say about the hundred's and
> > hundred's the usual Suspects. Shall I list out some of for, example Mr.
> > MIdduises's grotesque crimes against me? I could easily proove that youare
> > one of Atkinson's scokpuppet's. We already have a big pile of evidence to
> > show Atkisnons sockpupeting is out of control. ;-)
> >
> > Come back when you have a clue Mr. Waste. LOl! ;-)
>
> 27 minutes and the noise ratio is already 100%
> I had hopes that the thread would have done better.

Oh did you now?! Didn't seem to mind it when you added your venom and
BS to my threads, even after I specifically requested that people like
you stay away from it, if you were only going to be adding your "noise"
to it. Choke on your hypocrisy, westface.

March 8th 06, 05:37 AM
Bret Ludwig wrote:

> No one wants to discuss anything of substance here, so what's the
> problem? I'm all for serious discussion but those posts get ignored.

I posted several threads recently calling for serious discussion. You
can start there if that's what youre looking for. They include "Tip for
Open Minded Audiophiles" and "Amazing Tweak ".

Vive la difference!

March 8th 06, 05:42 AM
****-for-Brains wrote :

> In message . com>,
> wrote:
> >
> > In response to the issue of hijacking the thread, I have given those
> > interested to pursuing another topic the opportunity.
> > Not an Arny fan, but could we please keep Arny Bashing to a
> > minimum. It's a high milage subject.
> >
> >
> I notice Mr. Weast that, you have nothing to say about the hundred's and
> hundred's the usual Suspects. Shall I list out some of for, example Mr.
> MIdduises's grotesque crimes against me? I could easily proove that you are
> one of Atkinson's scokpuppet's. We already have a big pile of evidence to
> show Atkisnons sockpupeting is out of control. ;-)
>
> Come back when you have a clue Mr. Waste. LOl! ;-)

Honestly, I really thought this was Arny Krueger, until I backed up and
read the name. You do a good impression of him, George.

Clyde Slick
March 8th 06, 12:32 PM
"Michael Conzo" > wrote in message
...
> In article googlegroups.com, "
> > thusly:
>> In response to the issue of hijacking the thread, I have given those
>> interested to pursuing another topic the opportunity.
>> Not an Arny fan, but could we please keep Arny Bashing to a
>> minimum. It's a high milage subject.
>
> I don't recall who's on what side in this blue. However there is an
> extensive and detailed article in the Nov05 issue of Sound & Video
> Contractor on the testing done at Harman/JBL labs. The opening of the
> article discusses in depth listener training and the use of A/B/X testing
> as
> the core of their design process.
>
> For what its worth
>


Bose 901's suck, don't you agree?



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Clyde Slick
March 8th 06, 01:24 PM
> wrote in message
oups.com...
>

>
> Honestly, I really thought this was Arny Krueger, until I backed up and
> read the name. You do a good impression of him, George.
>

He practicie with The Chipmunks.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access