MD
February 1st 06, 01:47 AM
References: >
In-Reply-To: >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: >
Lines: 31
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.161.206.24
X-Trace: sv3-O6pEb2a2Hxr5RaKA9NE/DMcZq+4m2699tLRlfPBFdLdJOo/HzFKBIppmQeUh3jAB+DplWyDKe9bKsbq!YLkPi8D8zYkSHgPly b5803zOqNxZLvreQnh2O2WvEBolD/bLk4IaxYsGZa1+67T1iawFMFuhXD0d!psqnFfUlljmgMLQ=
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:796592
Peter wrote:
> Since much has been written about the pros and cons of Behringer equipment I
> wonder if anyone might be willing to comment about a specific Behringer
> component, namely the Ultragraph Pro FBQ6200 Ultra-Musical 31-Band Stereo
> Graphic Equalizer with FBQ Feedback Detection System, Behringer's
> "top-of-the-line" equalizer?
>
> According to the company literature this Equalizer incorporates Swiss Alps
> potentiometers, which surely have a good reputation, and it also features a
> relay operated "hard" bypass, in order to permit instant comparison between
> the equalized vs. the unequalized signal.
>
> Unfortunately I have no idea about the quality, or sound, of the op amps
> used in this Behringer equalizer.
>
> I do not intend to use this equalizer in a professional recording setup, but
> rather for a home stereo system in order to hopefully adjust the system's
> response in order to cope with certain room anomalies.
>
> Thank you very much for your kind consideration and comments.
>
>
>
>
>
>
I don't like graphic EQs compared to Parametric units (I have the
FBQ-2496 and love it). One wants to be able to set the center freq and
bandwidth of the correction. An standard EQ won't be helpful - without
adding negative affects - unless your very lucky and some of the
controls you have line up EXACTLY with what you are trying to fix.
In-Reply-To: >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: >
Lines: 31
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.161.206.24
X-Trace: sv3-O6pEb2a2Hxr5RaKA9NE/DMcZq+4m2699tLRlfPBFdLdJOo/HzFKBIppmQeUh3jAB+DplWyDKe9bKsbq!YLkPi8D8zYkSHgPly b5803zOqNxZLvreQnh2O2WvEBolD/bLk4IaxYsGZa1+67T1iawFMFuhXD0d!psqnFfUlljmgMLQ=
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:796592
Peter wrote:
> Since much has been written about the pros and cons of Behringer equipment I
> wonder if anyone might be willing to comment about a specific Behringer
> component, namely the Ultragraph Pro FBQ6200 Ultra-Musical 31-Band Stereo
> Graphic Equalizer with FBQ Feedback Detection System, Behringer's
> "top-of-the-line" equalizer?
>
> According to the company literature this Equalizer incorporates Swiss Alps
> potentiometers, which surely have a good reputation, and it also features a
> relay operated "hard" bypass, in order to permit instant comparison between
> the equalized vs. the unequalized signal.
>
> Unfortunately I have no idea about the quality, or sound, of the op amps
> used in this Behringer equalizer.
>
> I do not intend to use this equalizer in a professional recording setup, but
> rather for a home stereo system in order to hopefully adjust the system's
> response in order to cope with certain room anomalies.
>
> Thank you very much for your kind consideration and comments.
>
>
>
>
>
>
I don't like graphic EQs compared to Parametric units (I have the
FBQ-2496 and love it). One wants to be able to set the center freq and
bandwidth of the correction. An standard EQ won't be helpful - without
adding negative affects - unless your very lucky and some of the
controls you have line up EXACTLY with what you are trying to fix.