Question for duh-Mikey

[George M. Middius]

So, Mickey, you failed to come to terms with the Krooborg's vicious
attacks on Jennifer. No surprise there. The sight of your idol behaving
worse than those who torment you must have been oh so shocking.

Now then. In another thread, we have further evidence of Krooger's
disintegrating connection to reality. I'm speaking of his random and
baseless accusations of misconduct again John Atkinson. We know that you
hate and fear JA, and that you would love to see his magazine censored or
even bankrupted. But does your loyalty to your demented anti-audio crusade
allow you to excuse Krooger's nasty lies about Mr. Atkinson?

Make an effort to answer now. Don't worry about the pool of vomit -- Mommy
will clean it up when she gets home.

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...

> So, Mickey, you failed to come to terms with the Krooborg's vicious
> attacks on Jennifer. No surprise there. The sight of your idol behaving
> worse than those who torment you must have been oh so shocking.

This is sanctimonious bull-pucky considering Middius' long track record of
making posts that were similar in nature to the ones that Eddie recently
made, that many have censored.

Fact is that Middius has for years made posts just as vile as Eddie's, only
more of them. And, his friend Art Sackman has defended them.

George Middius and Art Sackman are personally responsible for much of the
ill will that wracks RAO. He uses debating trade tricks like this to
distract newbies about his responsibility for things being the way they are.

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote in message ...
>
>> So, Mickey, you failed to come to terms with the Krooborg's vicious
>> attacks on Jennifer. No surprise there. The sight of your idol behaving
>> worse than those who torment you must have been oh so shocking.
>
> This is sanctimonious bull-pucky considering Middius' long track record of
> making posts that were similar in nature to the ones that Eddie recently
> made, that many have censored.
>
> Fact is that Middius has for years made posts just as vile as Eddie's,
> only more of them. And, his friend Art Sackman has defended them.
>
> George Middius and Art Sackman are personally responsible for much of the
> ill will that wracks RAO. He uses debating trade tricks like this to
> distract newbies about his responsibility for things being the way they
> are.
>

That one was a little funny, at least a 7. Your sense of humor is getting
better.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Fella]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
> in message ...
>
>
>>So, Mickey, you failed to come to terms with the Krooborg's vicious
>>attacks on Jennifer. No surprise there. The sight of your idol behaving
>>worse than those who torment you must have been oh so shocking.
>
>
> This is sanctimonious bull-pucky considering Middius' long track record of
> making posts that were similar in nature to the ones that Eddie recently
> made, that many have censored.

Up to today I was attributing the "eccentric" style of eddie to his lack
of english, perhaps he is not a native speaker (like me), I was
thinking. But after that post I see that the "thing" is just plain
dumber then dumb.


> Fact is that Middius has for years made posts just as vile as Eddie's,

That is most probably not true. I do not even want to you give
references, since I want that subject closed. Period.

You should simply STOP using that subject. It DOES NOT work!

> only
> more of them. And, his friend Art Sackman has defended them.
>
> George Middius and Art Sackman are personally responsible for much of the
> ill will that wracks RAO.

No, they are not. RAO is a filthy place because of the likes of you and
that mickeymickmickey-brains. Most of what you guys do, you do it with
malicious intent. Your recent attacks on Jenn and the debating trade
tactics with the whole dark messy issues brought up by mickeybrains is
proof enough.

Art Sackman comes across as a witty, normal human being. He is
originally funny with some of his posts. I don't think he would want to
harm anyone or be vile and bad to anyone.

Middius is a mixed bag of fruits, so to say. He *is* in a state of
extreme anger towards you. I think I know the reason why: He has tried
to analyze you and the "kroologic" you polute existence with and that
has put a couple of shorts circuits in his brain, it seems. But I do not
think he has done anything even remotely close as vile as that dim
eddie. He does try to be "ironic". And complete understanding of the
"reverse-tactics" he uses in his texts to convey a given context across
does require a better command of the english language and analytical
thinking od its mathematics... Though the *main* reason why you and your
team are offended so much by him is that you guys nevertheless *sense*
that he is a very potent writer, though you guys never completely
understand, it seems, just what he accomplishes. He is at times VERY
funny and he commands the english language much much better then you and
mickeythemickmickey put together and mutiplied by ten. He is also much
much more creative then you guys will ever be. All this makes you guys
jealous, which just exacerbates your hatred towards him, that you guys
try in vain to lift him to some ultra-demon status. It's all a
tragicomic situation in the end, really.

[Arny Krueger]

"Fella" > wrote in message
.. .
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>> wrote in message ...
>>
>>
>>>So, Mickey, you failed to come to terms with the Krooborg's vicious
>>>attacks on Jennifer. No surprise there. The sight of your idol behaving
>>>worse than those who torment you must have been oh so shocking.
>>
>>
>> This is sanctimonious bull-pucky considering Middius' long track record
>> of making posts that were similar in nature to the ones that Eddie
>> recently made, that many have censored.

> Up to today I was attributing the "eccentric" style of eddie to his lack
> of english, perhaps he is not a native speaker (like me), I was thinking.
> But after that post I see that the "thing" is just plain dumber then dumb.

>> Fact is that Middius has for years made posts just as vile as Eddie's,

> That is most probably not true.

LOL!

> I do not even want to you give references, since I want that subject
> closed. Period.

Oh, you want references?

Here's just two of 100s:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/18145fc3268bdac9

From: (George M. Middius)
Subject: Re: George exposes his life...
Date: 1998/10/16
Message-ID: >#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 401860510
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: >
>
> >
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: autumn.news.rcn.net 908557453 17799 207.172.119.1 (16 Oct 1998
17:04:13 GMT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Oct 1998 17:04:13 GMT
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion

The Krooborg panics and heads for the hills.

>I don't think my Dad's Obit is on the web, being that he
>died in 1986. Now if Nate could have pulled off a
>murder-suicide like that when he was 4, and then live for 12
>more years after his suicide, that would be quite an
>accomplishment, would it not? ;-)

So it was you who offed your dad. I suspect you
convinced poor Nate that Grandpa's death was his fault,
and that guilt-trip drove the boy to suicide.

>Are you getting hard up for something to whine about or what?

What fates are you planning for the remaining survivors
in your family, Arnii?

George M.
Middiushttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/73efa4dc30a3f0d2
From: (George M. Middius)
Subject: Re: People who hear differences in cables and not distortion in
vinyl
Date: 1999/01/08
Message-ID: >#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 430291599
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: >
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: vO3C5Ls1ulBDrfs9mtmMigvIs9sQ/F07J0gWgPsv2c8=
Organization: Anti-Cyborg Resistance, North America
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Jan 1999 19:34:56 GMT
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion

The Krooborg dreams of dust bunnies.

>>>When I lived in El Paso, managing dust was impossible.

>>How about the coffin you live in now?

>About 3,000 square feet, two floors and a basement. Works for me!

Did Nate die from breathing too much dust? Can't you keep
your mauseoleum a little cleaner, if only for the sake of
the children you haven't murdered yet?






> You should simply STOP using that subject. It DOES NOT work!
>
>> only more of them. And, his friend Art Sackman has defended them.
>>
>> George Middius and Art Sackman are personally responsible for much of the
>> ill will that wracks RAO.
>
> No, they are not. RAO is a filthy place because of the likes of you and
> that mickeymickmickey-brains. Most of what you guys do, you do it with
> malicious intent. Your recent attacks on Jenn and the debating trade
> tactics with the whole dark messy issues brought up by mickeybrains is
> proof enough.
>
> Art Sackman comes across as a witty, normal human being. He is originally
> funny with some of his posts. I don't think he would want to harm anyone
> or be vile and bad to anyone.
>
> Middius is a mixed bag of fruits, so to say. He *is* in a state of extreme
> anger towards you. I think I know the reason why: He has tried to analyze
> you and the "kroologic" you polute existence with and that has put a
> couple of shorts circuits in his brain, it seems. But I do not think he
> has done anything even remotely close as vile as that dim eddie. He does
> try to be "ironic". And complete understanding of the "reverse-tactics" he
> uses in his texts to convey a given context across does require a better
> command of the english language and analytical thinking od its
> mathematics... Though the *main* reason why you and your team are offended
> so much by him is that you guys nevertheless *sense* that he is a very
> potent writer, though you guys never completely understand, it seems, just
> what he accomplishes. He is at times VERY funny and he commands the
> english language much much better then you and mickeythemickmickey put
> together and mutiplied by ten. He is also much much more creative then you
> guys will ever be. All this makes you guys jealous, which just exacerbates
> your hatred towards him, that you guys try in vain to lift him to some
> ultra-demon status. It's all a tragicomic situation in the end, really.
>

[Fella]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> "Fella" > wrote in message

>
>>I do not even want to you give references, since I want that subject
>>closed. Period.
>
>
> Oh, you want references?

There was a "wordo" there Arny. I meant to say that "I do not even want
you to give references" ... And I don't.

What eddie did below and what you quote from middius are not the same,
IMO. What middius does is beyond tasteless, like I say below, he is
mixed up a bit, and I think that most part of the re-wiring going on in
his brain is because of you.. But what eddie has done surpasses any
imaginable border, lowest of the low.

Actually the *real* question here is that why in the world would you
carry some tragic event like that over to this perverted usenet in the
first place?

Arny, I am asking this in all sincerity, so please do not "react" to it
in your automatic ways, but please *think* about it: Have you ever had
any counseling on this subject from a professional? One just needs
*help* to cope with a huge tragedy like that, there is nothing to be
ashamed of. Come to think of it, have you ever seeked any help for this
"usenet career" of yours?

[Arny Krueger]

"Fella" > wrote in message
.. .
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>> "Fella" > wrote in message
>
>>
>>>I do not even want to you give references, since I want that subject
>>>closed. Period.
>>
>>
>> Oh, you want references?

> There was a "wordo" there Arny. I meant to say that "I do not even want
> you to give references" ... And I don't.

Well I just wanted to paint a picture of how deeply you are in denial,
Fella.

> What eddie did below and what you quote from middius are not the same,
> IMO. What middius does is beyond tasteless, like I say below, he is mixed
> up a bit, and I think that most part of the re-wiring going on in his
> brain is because of you.. But what eddie has done surpasses any imaginable
> border, lowest of the low.

Middius, Briggs and other have made nearly identical posts to Eddie's, only
they did it several times a day and for weeks or months at a time. Eddy is
just flash in the pan in comparison.

> Actually the *real* question here is that why in the world would you carry
> some tragic event like that over to this perverted usenet in the first
> place?

The sort of posts seen here from Eddie, Middius and Briggs were IME quite
unprecidented among the audio groups on Usenet when they first happened.
There was no precident on the audio groups for abuse at this level.

RAO was a more-or-less civilized place before we started picking up massive
garbage from the likes of Middius and Briggs.

Back in the mid-90s people were scandalized by the what we would now call
mildly abusive posts from Zip and Derrida when they first happened.

The point here is that Middius is obviously trying to clean up his image by
getting all huffy over things that are minor on the scale of his past
behavior.

Middius is also a sockpuppet and proven/admitted creator of additional
sockpuppets, so there's a good chance that Middius and Eddie share more than
a little bit in common.

IOW all the person behind Middius has to do is fabricate the Eddie persona
using the same means he has used to maintain the Middius persona, and he can
post what he will and keep the Middius persona "clean".