Question for Sillybot about DBT

[George M. Middius]

I put to you, Sillybot, a question that has been repeatedly posed by
Ludovic, and each time you've waffled or ducked or otherwise evaded
answering. It could be you're too dumb to understand the question, but I
think it's more likely you're terrified of actual science and are only
willing to endorse phoney 'borg science that you claim reinforces your
religious beliefs. Anyway, here's the question:

You keep referring to medical/pharmaceutical DBTs as the paradigm of all
DBTs' efficacy. However, Ludovic has repeatedly pointed out the biggest
difference between real DBTs used for drug trials and the half-assed kind
endorsed by the Hive. That difference being that with real DBTs, the
evidence of effectiveness is objectively measured with proven diagnostic
tools such as lab work or radiological exams, whereas in the dogmatic
preachings of the aBxism choir, the only "evidence" is entirely
subjective. In simple terms, the "evidence" yielded by aBxism rituals has
no objective basis whatsoever.

Why, then, do you keep repeating the same discredited position?


And a follow-up question from me: When are you finally, finally, FINALLY
going to undertake an audio DBT yourself? It's quite inane of you to keep
insisting on the effectiveness of aBxism rituals when you're clearly
scared of them yourself. Not that hypocrisy is an unknown quality in the
Hive. ;-) It's just that you seem like you should know better. Maybe when
you grow up, you'll see how asinine your prating is. But in the meantime,
you should take my word for it. I urge you to breach the comfort of your
church for the sake of learning something about real life.

[[email protected]]

Tell us about science, Middiarse. From your little brain, not from the
fat kike in Maryland, the dumb**** waiter in Tennessee, the daddy
****er in Pennsylvania, the cocksucker from Texas or any other members
of your band of social misfits and outcasts.



George M. Middius wrote:
> I put to you, Sillybot, a question that has been repeatedly posed by
> Ludovic, and each time you've waffled or ducked or otherwise evaded
> answering. It could be you're too dumb to understand the question, but I
> think it's more likely you're terrified of actual science and are only
> willing to endorse phoney 'borg science that you claim reinforces your
> religious beliefs. Anyway, here's the question:
>
> You keep referring to medical/pharmaceutical DBTs as the paradigm of all
> DBTs' efficacy. However, Ludovic has repeatedly pointed out the biggest
> difference between real DBTs used for drug trials and the half-assed kind
> endorsed by the Hive. That difference being that with real DBTs, the
> evidence of effectiveness is objectively measured with proven diagnostic
> tools such as lab work or radiological exams, whereas in the dogmatic
> preachings of the aBxism choir, the only "evidence" is entirely
> subjective. In simple terms, the "evidence" yielded by aBxism rituals has
> no objective basis whatsoever.
>
> Why, then, do you keep repeating the same discredited position?
>
>
> And a follow-up question from me: When are you finally, finally, FINALLY
> going to undertake an audio DBT yourself? It's quite inane of you to keep
> insisting on the effectiveness of aBxism rituals when you're clearly
> scared of them yourself. Not that hypocrisy is an unknown quality in the
> Hive. ;-) It's just that you seem like you should know better. Maybe when
> you grow up, you'll see how asinine your prating is. But in the meantime,
> you should take my word for it. I urge you to breach the comfort of your
> church for the sake of learning something about real life.