A modest proposal for cataloguing Arny Krueger's lies

[Andre Jute]

George M. Middius wrote:
> Andre Jute said:
>
> > Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281:
>
> The count might actually be higher,

Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as
long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering
method for Arny's lies.

(200) elided
5 -- fifth year of the century
12 -- twelfth month i.e. December
xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year

This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only
Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred
lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into
account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In
months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be

xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year,
which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it.

This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical
schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a
simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years
elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition.

Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't
need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are
studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle.

I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of
RAO chief liar.

Your humble servant,

Andre Jute

[Robert Morein]

"Andre Jute" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> George M. Middius wrote:
>> Andre Jute said:
>>
>> > Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281:
>>
>> The count might actually be higher,
>
> Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as
> long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering
> method for Arny's lies.
>
> (200) elided
> 5 -- fifth year of the century
> 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December
> xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year
>
> This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only
> Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred
> lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into
> account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In
> months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be
>
> xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year,
> which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it.
>
> This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical
> schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a
> simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years
> elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition.
>
> Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't
> need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are
> studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle.
>
> I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of
> RAO chief liar.
>
> Your humble servant,
>
> Andre Jute
>
This seems to be a reasonable methodology. It might be worthwhile to
cross-index them according to subject material as well. For this purpose, I
nominate the Dewey Decimal System, which should accomodate Arny's ability to
transmogrify truthful information within any subdomain of knowledge.

The suggested elision of the century assumes that Krueger's lying spirit
will not survive the destruction of his mortal body. I hope this decision is
vindicated.

Furthermore, I propose the following neologism(s), for the activity which
involves buggering the truth for self-serving psychological motives:
"kruegerize", or simply, "krueger".

Examples of use may be found at http://www.unknownnews.net/040723a-mz.html

[Andre Jute]

Robert Morein wrote:
> "Andre Jute" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> > George M. Middius wrote:
> >> Andre Jute said:
> >>
> >> > Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281:
> >>
> >> The count might actually be higher,
> >
> > Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as
> > long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering
> > method for Arny's lies.
> >
> > (200) elided
> > 5 -- fifth year of the century
> > 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December
> > xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year
> >
> > This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only
> > Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred
> > lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into
> > account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In
> > months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be
> >
> > xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year,
> > which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it.
> >
> > This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical
> > schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a
> > simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years
> > elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition.
> >
> > Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't
> > need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are
> > studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle.
> >
> > I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of
> > RAO chief liar.
> >
> > Your humble servant,
> >
> > Andre Jute
> >
> This seems to be a reasonable methodology. It might be worthwhile to
> cross-index them according to subject material as well. For this purpose, I
> nominate the Dewey Decimal System, which should accomodate Arny's ability to
> transmogrify truthful information within any subdomain of knowledge.
>
> The suggested elision of the century assumes that Krueger's lying spirit
> will not survive the destruction of his mortal body. I hope this decision is
> vindicated.

Bloody hell, Robert, you will us nightmares!

> Furthermore, I propose the following neologism(s), for the activity which
> involves buggering the truth for self-serving psychological motives:
> "kruegerize", or simply, "krueger".

I like it! "He kruegered the truth." It definitely has the right brutal
image conjured up by Krueger's regular rape of the truth without the
vulgarity of language to which anger at Krueger's lies may otherwise
tempt perfectly decent folk.

Andre Jute

"Andre Jute" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> George M. Middius wrote:
>> Andre Jute said:
>>
>> > Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281:
>>
>> The count might actually be higher,
>
> Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as
> long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering
> method for Arny's lies.
>
> (200) elided
> 5 -- fifth year of the century
> 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December
> xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year
>
> This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only
> Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred
> lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into
> account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In
> months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be
>
> xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year,
> which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it.
>
> This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical
> schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a
> simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years
> elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition.
>
> Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't
> need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are
> studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle.
>
> I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of
> RAO chief liar.
>
> Your humble servant,
>
> Andre Jute
>
Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number of
times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent.

"Andre Jute" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
>> "Andre Jute" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> > George M. Middius wrote:
>> >> Andre Jute said:
>> >>
>> >> > Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281:
>> >>
>> >> The count might actually be higher,
>> >
>> > Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as
>> > long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering
>> > method for Arny's lies.
>> >
>> > (200) elided
>> > 5 -- fifth year of the century
>> > 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December
>> > xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year
>> >
>> > This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only
>> > Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred
>> > lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into
>> > account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In
>> > months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be
>> >
>> > xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year,
>> > which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it.
>> >
>> > This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical
>> > schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a
>> > simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years
>> > elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition.
>> >
>> > Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't
>> > need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are
>> > studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle.
>> >
>> > I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of
>> > RAO chief liar.
>> >
>> > Your humble servant,
>> >
>> > Andre Jute
>> >
>> This seems to be a reasonable methodology. It might be worthwhile to
>> cross-index them according to subject material as well. For this purpose,
>> I
>> nominate the Dewey Decimal System, which should accomodate Arny's ability
>> to
>> transmogrify truthful information within any subdomain of knowledge.
>>
>> The suggested elision of the century assumes that Krueger's lying spirit
>> will not survive the destruction of his mortal body. I hope this decision
>> is
>> vindicated.
>
> Bloody hell, Robert, you will us nightmares!
>
>> Furthermore, I propose the following neologism(s), for the activity which
>> involves buggering the truth for self-serving psychological motives:
>> "kruegerize", or simply, "krueger".
>
> I like it! "He kruegered the truth." It definitely has the right brutal
> image conjured up by Krueger's regular rape of the truth without the
> vulgarity of language to which anger at Krueger's lies may otherwise
> tempt perfectly decent folk.
>
> Andre Jute
>
So you want to take the suggestions of a liar and technical incompetent to
attack someone who tells the truth and IS technically competent.

How long have you lived on Bizarro world?

[Robert Morein]

> wrote in message
nk.net...
>
[snip]
>>
> So you want to take the suggestions of a liar and technical incompetent to
> attack someone who tells the truth and IS technically competent.
>
> How long have you lived on Bizarro world?
>
Bingo!
Mikey, you sure krugered the truth about Arny.

[Ruud Broens]

> wrote in message
nk.net...
: Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number of
: times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent.
:
for you, i'll spell it _prove it !_

hehe
take a stand, ne stand, no matter, what ? ;-)

[Robert Morein]

"Ruud Broens" > wrote in message
...
>
> > wrote in message
> nk.net...
> : Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number
> of
> : times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent.
> :
> for you, i'll spell it _prove it !_
>
> hehe
> take a stand, ne stand, no matter, what ? ;-)
>
I've just been immortalized in a mathematical series.
Ain't bad.

[Ruud Broens]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
:
: "Ruud Broens" > wrote in message
: ...
: >
: > > wrote in message
: > nk.net...
: > : Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number
: > of
: > : times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent.
: > :
: > for you, i'll spell it _prove it !_
: >
: > hehe
: > take a stand, ne stand, no matter, what ? ;-)
: >
: I've just been immortalized in a mathematical series.
: Ain't bad.
:
...but did Mimck get _the other stand_ ?
;-)
R.

> wrote in message
nk.net...
>
> "Andre Jute" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>> George M. Middius wrote:
>>> Andre Jute said:
>>>
>>> > Arny Kruger Lie No. 51281:
>>>
>>> The count might actually be higher,
>>
>> Of course you're right, George. But I didn't want to use a number as
>> long as your arm to the elbow, so I humbly suggest my new numbering
>> method for Arny's lies.
>>
>> (200) elided
>> 5 -- fifth year of the century
>> 12 -- twelfth month i.e. December
>> xx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of that year
>>
>> This numbering scheme will of course restrict us to counting only
>> Arny's important lies because, clearly, he tells more than a hundred
>> lies every month. However, we should take the phase of the moon into
>> account, so that Arny's insanity can be included the reckoning. In
>> months when there are two full moons the third indicator will be
>>
>> xxx -- the number of Arny's particular lie in that month of the year,
>> which can then be seen at a glance to have two full moons in it.
>>
>> This scheme avoids huge running total numbers, confusing alphanumerical
>> schemes, and permit addition of Arny's total lies in a year by just a
>> simple addition of lies in any twelvemonth, or for all the years
>> elapsed in a century by an equally simple addition.
>>
>> Also, it has the advantage of instant statistical utility (we don't
>> need to dissect huge totals into equal periods) for those who are
>> studying Krueger's mendacity to discover if there is a longterm cycle.
>>
>> I trust my modest scheme will find acceptance with senior students of
>> RAO chief liar.
>>
>> Your humble servant,
>>
>> Andre Jute
>>
> Take that number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number of
> times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent.
>
Corrected spelling for the nitpickers.

"Ruud Broens" > wrote in message
...
>
> > wrote in message
> nk.net...
> : Take yhat number, square it, multiply by 3 and you will have the number
> of
> : times Robert has shown himself to be technically incompetent.
> :
> for you, i'll spell it _prove it !_
>
> hehe
> take a stand, ne stand, no matter, what ? ;-)
>
I have been at least as rigorous in my calculations and conclusions as
Bobby.