Note to Arny the liar

[ScottW]

I see you could not provide any evidence to support your false claim.

Congratulations on your new title, Arny the liar.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Scottie said:

> Congratulations on your new title, Arny the liar.

What's new about it?

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Scottie said:
>
> > Congratulations on your new title, Arny the liar.
>
> What's new about it?

My bestowal.

ScottW

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:9cAsb.80$Ue4.13@fed1read01

> I see you could not provide any evidence to support your false claim.

I offered evidence to you but you didn't ask for it at the time I offered
it.

I had it sitting in another window, ready to go. You missed your chance.
Don't blame me because you are so slow-witted, Scotty.

[ScottW]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:9cAsb.80$Ue4.13@fed1read01
>
> > I see you could not provide any evidence to support your false claim.
>
> I offered evidence to you but you didn't ask for it at the time I offered
> it.

On 11/11 at 1:47 PM Arny said:

"Wrong. Do I need to provide quotes from google? I researched this issue
before I made my comment."


To which I replied at 2:41 PM of the same day:

"Go for it. Show where I trashed any gear based solely on country
origin."

and

"But present your case nonetheless. You will be full of
**** as usual."

as well as:

"You make unsubstantiated accusations and then
jubilantly claim you have accomplished something.
Who else does that?
Oh yeah, that would be your new pal, Trots."

>
> I had it sitting in another window, ready to go. You missed your chance.
> Don't blame me because you are so slow-witted, Scotty.

Are you going to claim that a < 1 hour delay in responding is grounds
for your failure to substantiate your bs?

You must think you're on AIM.

You're a liar and an idiot.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...
> You're a liar and an idiot.
>
> ScottW
>
>

Hey Arny,
No response yet. You must be a coward as well.

ScottW

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:9cAsb.80$Ue4.13@fed1read01...
> I see you could not provide any evidence to support your false claim.
>
> Congratulations on your new title, Arny the liar.
>
> ScottW


NEW title????
Where ya been, boy?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:OEBsb.140$Ue4.136@fed1read01

> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...

>> You're a liar and an idiot.

Cut to the chase, that's the story that Scott wants to tell.

>> ScottW

> Hey Arny,

> No response yet. You must be a coward as well.

It's so ironic to see Scott who claims he's not an internet dweeb, obsessing
over the fact that I didn't reply within 20 minutes. Guess what? I was
off-Usenet, enjoying my life. About 12 hours later making my rounds...

BTW, note that Scott our self-proclaimed minion of truth, so completely and
ruthlessly edited and *******ized my post to make his point that he's
unwilling to provide a link to the original text.

Hint: the original text tells a completely different story than the one that
Scott wants it to tell. So Scott deceptively deleted text and moved it
around until it told the story he wanted. He's obviously taking his lessons
in lying from Middius, Dormer, etc.

What does transparent lying like this make Scott? Just read what he said at
the top of the post. It's auto-biographical. He's projecting.

[dave weil]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:10:50 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"ScottW" > wrote in message
>news:OEBsb.140$Ue4.136@fed1read01
>
>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>> news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...
>
>>> You're a liar and an idiot.
>
>Cut to the chase, that's the story that Scott wants to tell.
>
>>> ScottW
>
>> Hey Arny,
>
>> No response yet. You must be a coward as well.
>
>It's so ironic to see Scott who claims he's not an internet dweeb, obsessing
>over the fact that I didn't reply within 20 minutes. Guess what? I was
>off-Usenet, enjoying my life. About 12 hours later making my rounds...
>
>BTW, note that Scott our self-proclaimed minion of truth, so completely and
>ruthlessly edited and *******ized my post to make his point that he's
>unwilling to provide a link to the original text.
>
>Hint: the original text tells a completely different story than the one that
>Scott wants it to tell. So Scott deceptively deleted text and moved it
>around until it told the story he wanted. He's obviously taking his lessons
>in lying from Middius, Dormer, etc.
>
>What does transparent lying like this make Scott? Just read what he said at
>the top of the post. It's auto-biographical. He's projecting.

I'm still waiting for you to produce any proof of your claim.

This is what you do when you *can't* back up claims. You start
blustering about other things.

It's simple, Arnold - produce the claim or apologize. I didn't edit
anything here - I'm asking you a direct question. Can you or can you
not produce a quote where he dissed equipment simply based on its
country of origin?

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message

> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:10:50 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:

>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>> news:OEBsb.140$Ue4.136@fed1read01

>>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>>> news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...

>>>> You're a liar and an idiot.

>> Cut to the chase, that's the story that Scott wants to tell.

>>> Hey Arny,

>>> No response yet. You must be a coward as well.

>> It's so ironic to see Scott who claims he's not an internet dweeb,
>> obsessing over the fact that I didn't reply within 20 minutes. Guess
>> what? I was off-Usenet, enjoying my life. About 12 hours later
>> making my rounds...

>> BTW, note that Scott our self-proclaimed minion of truth, so
>> completely and ruthlessly edited and *******ized my post to make his
>> point that he's unwilling to provide a link to the original text.

>> Hint: the original text tells a completely different story than the
>> one that Scott wants it to tell. So Scott deceptively deleted text
>> and moved it around until it told the story he wanted. He's
>> obviously taking his lessons in lying from Middius, Dormer, etc.

>> What does transparent lying like this make Scott? Just read what he
>> said at the top of the post. It's auto-biographical. He's projecting.

> I'm still waiting for you to produce any proof of your claim.

The fact that Scotty is so clearly in the post-butchering business will tell
most people what they need to know about him. The fact that you Weil shortly
lie about the topic of the dispute between Scott and I should tell most
people what they need to know about you.

> This is what you do when you *can't* back up claims. You start
> blustering about other things.

Like I said, I had the proof in another window when I wrote the post. Scott
dropped the ball after I waited a reasonable amount of time.

However from working with you Weil for years, I know the next step. I
provide the proof and it's responded to by denial and dissembling.

> It's simple, Arnold - produce the claim or apologize.

Sorry Ms. Dominatrix, I don't jump when you demand it.

> I didn't edit anything here - I'm asking you a direct question.

You're not even really part of the discussion Weil. If you want to try to
play second for Scotty you can attempt to pull what you will, but I don't
have to honor it. You deserve dishonor. I'm glad to give you your just
deserts.

This is a common game around here - I provide the proof for a buttinsky, and
that allows the person who made the original deceptive claim to be free to
ignore it.

I've cornered just about every regular here, so I know exactly what happens
from long experience.

>Can you or can you
> not produce a quote where he dissed equipment simply based on its
> country of origin?

That's not what I claimed about Scotty in this case, Weil. Thanks for
showing your true deceptive colors so quickly.

<And this folks is how the RAO twist-him, turn-him tag-team attack game is
played. I learned of this game by watching people work over "Gene" when I
first started posting here.>

[dave weil]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:57:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>That's not what I claimed about Scotty in this case, Weil. Thanks for
>showing your true deceptive colors so quickly.

You know, I almost wrote that you would do this exact thing. Because I
didn't go back and get an *exact* quote, you can claimed you didn't
use the word "diss" or something like it. But I decided not to simply
to watch you do this. That's also why I didn't bother to go back and
cut and paste your exact quote. I wanted to see you pull this common
tactic of yours.

Well guys, this is *exactly* the sort of thing that Arnold foists on
the group.

He claims that he *had* the proof in a window and was ready to send
it, but ScottW didn't reply in a timely fashion. So suddenly, he's off
the hook to supply the proof.

Well, the point is, Arnold doesn't have the proof because IT DOESN'T
EXIST.

I wish you would take the RAHE solution. Now.

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message

> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:57:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:

>> That's not what I claimed about Scotty in this case, Weil. Thanks for
>> showing your true deceptive colors so quickly.

> You know, I almost wrote that you would do this exact thing.

Sure Weil, and that's because you knew you were lying. You know that I tend
to catch you lying and complain about it. Obviously you know that you are
lying, or it wouldn't be a lie. That makes it easy for you to predict that I
will catch you lying and then I will complain about your lie(s).

> Because I
> didn't go back and get an *exact* quote, you can claimed you didn't
> use the word "diss" or something like it.

You're lying again, Weil. You've shifted focus from an entire sentence to
just one word: "diss". Predictably, you deleted what you had just claimed.
Now you're trying to change the focus from what you just said in your
previous post, to this one trivial word.

> But I decided not to simply to watch you do this.

No Weil, you decided to do some more deceptive editing, and then you told
another lie.

> That's also why I didn't bother to go back and
> cut and paste your exact quote. I wanted to see you pull this common
> tactic of yours.

Given Weil that it's predictable that you'll lie and delete relevant text
and lie again, my tactics are indeed quite predictable. I take exception to
your lying and point out your simple-minded and utterly transparent
strategy.

> Well guys, this is *exactly* the sort of thing that Arnold foists on
> the group.

What to do when there are so many simpletons telling so many transparent
lies?

> He claims that he *had* the proof in a window and was ready to send
> it, but ScottW didn't reply in a timely fashion. So suddenly, he's off
> the hook to supply the proof.

Oh come on Weil. My strategy is a lot more complex than that. I hold the
issue out as bait and put pressure on you guys until you tell lots and lots
of transparent lies. If any of you gets desperate enough to actually argue
based on the original facts, the whole situation blows up in your faces,
because I've got my facts straight. You just have to reward me by letting me
catch you lying enough, and then if I'm in the mood, I deliver what I had in
my pocket all along.

> Well, the point is, Arnold doesn't have the proof because IT DOESN'T
> EXIST.

By this time Weil you've told enough lies that I suspect that you've even
found the proof I've had in my pocket all along. Look at all the lies you've
told just this morning!

> I wish you would take the RAHE solution. Now.

What would the "RAHE solution" be?

[dave weil]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:02:24 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"dave weil" > wrote in message

>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:57:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>
>>> That's not what I claimed about Scotty in this case, Weil. Thanks for
>>> showing your true deceptive colors so quickly.
>
>> You know, I almost wrote that you would do this exact thing.
>
>Sure Weil, and that's because you knew you were lying. You know that I tend
>to catch you lying and complain about it. Obviously you know that you are
>lying, or it wouldn't be a lie.

Krooglish. What a wonderful thing.

>That makes it easy for you to predict that I
>will catch you lying and then I will complain about your lie(s).

No, it makes it easy for me to watch you implode.

>> Because I
>> didn't go back and get an *exact* quote, you can claim you didn't
>> use the word "diss" or something like it.
>
>You're lying again, Weil. You've shifted focus from an entire sentence to
>just one word: "diss".

No, I used that as an example.

> Predictably, you deleted what you had just claimed.
>Now you're trying to change the focus from what you just said in your
>previous post, to this one trivial word.

No, it was an example.

Maybe you could compare what I said you said with what you actually
said.

>> But I decided not to simply to watch you do this.
>
>No Weil, you decided to do some more deceptive editing, and then you told
>another lie.

Liar.

>> That's also why I didn't bother to go back and
>> cut and paste your exact quote. I wanted to see you pull this common
>> tactic of yours.
>
>Given Weil that it's predictable that you'll lie and delete relevant text
>and lie again, my tactics are indeed quite predictable. I take exception to
>your lying and point out your simple-minded and utterly transparent
>strategy.

You don't even know which end is up.

>> Well guys, this is *exactly* the sort of thing that Arnold foists on
>> the group.
>
>What to do when there are so many simpletons telling so many transparent
>lies?

Fart on the group again, I guess. Way to go, Arnold. You should go
back to your role on Green Acres.

>> He claims that he *had* the proof in a window and was ready to send
>> it, but ScottW didn't reply in a timely fashion. So suddenly, he's off
>> the hook to supply the proof.
>
>Oh come on Weil. My strategy is a lot more complex than that. I hold the
>issue out as bait and put pressure on you guys until you tell lots and lots
>of transparent lies. If any of you gets desperate enough to actually argue
>based on the original facts, the whole situation blows up in your faces,
>because I've got my facts straight. You just have to reward me by letting me
>catch you lying enough, and then if I'm in the mood, I deliver what I had in
>my pocket all along.

Please. Pulling out a cum-covered hand doesn't count.

Put up or shut up. Play all the games you want, but until you
"deliver", you're nothing but an impotent fool. Cumming in your pocket
doesn't count towards ending the impotence.

>> Well, the point is, Arnold doesn't have the proof because IT DOESN'T
>> EXIST.
>
>By this time Weil you've told enough lies that I suspect that you've even
>found the proof I've had in my pocket all along. Look at all the lies you've
>told just this morning!

Haven't told a single lie.

Sorry.

You lose.

Again.

>> I wish you would take the RAHE solution. Now.
>
>What would the "RAHE solution" be?

Leave.

[ScottW]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:OEBsb.140$Ue4.136@fed1read01
>
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...
>
> >> You're a liar and an idiot.
>
> Cut to the chase, that's the story that Scott wants to tell.
>
> >> ScottW
>
> > Hey Arny,
>
> > No response yet. You must be a coward as well.
>
> It's so ironic to see Scott who claims he's not an internet dweeb,
obsessing
> over the fact that I didn't reply within 20 minutes. Guess what? I was
> off-Usenet, enjoying my life. About 12 hours later making my rounds...

Yesterday you used an hour delayed response as reason you didn't need to
provide evidence to support your accusation.
You're a hypocrite as well.
>
> BTW, note that Scott our self-proclaimed minion of truth, so completely
and
> ruthlessly edited and *******ized my post to make his point that he's
> unwilling to provide a link to the original text.

Here's the exchange with a little extra depth so the world can
see what a lying turd you are:

I said:
> >>>>> Trots is so knowledgeable about audio he can pass judgment on
> >>>>> equipment he has never heard, all he needs to know is the
> >>>>> country of origin. How can you compete with knowledge
> >>>>> like that?

Arny replied:
> >>>> And Scotty, how much audio gear have you passed judgment on here,
> >>>> under the same conditions?

To which I replied:
> >>> None

Arny responded falsely:
> Wrong. Do I need to provide quotes from google? I researched this issue
> before I made my comment.

Which I then challenged:
Go for it. Show where I trashed any gear based solely on country
origin.


This exchange can be found in message ID:

QAdsb.28130$Zb7.7416@fed1read01

>
> Hint: the original text tells a completely different story than the one
that
> Scott wants it to tell. So Scott deceptively deleted text and moved it
> around until it told the story he wanted. He's obviously taking his
lessons
> in lying from Middius, Dormer, etc.

The facts are clear to anyone who isn't delusioned.

>
> What does transparent lying like this make Scott? Just read what he said
at
> the top of the post. It's auto-biographical. He's projecting.

You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Scottie said to ****-for-Brains:

> You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
> You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

And, of course, exploring the bottom of Lake Superior.

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Scottie said to ****-for-Brains:
>
> > You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
> > You should be embarrassed and ashamed.
>
> And, of course, exploring the bottom of Lake Superior.

Lake Superior does not deserve to be the respository of
such toxic waste. Ship him to England in one those
old garbage scows.

ScottW

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:29:47 -0800, "ScottW" >
wrote:

>
>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>
>> Scottie said to ****-for-Brains:
>>
>> > You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
>> > You should be embarrassed and ashamed.
>>
>> And, of course, exploring the bottom of Lake Superior.
>
>Lake Superior does not deserve to be the respository of
>such toxic waste. Ship him to England in one those
>old garbage scows.

Excuse England??

--
td

[dave weil]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:32:13 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"ScottW" > wrote in message
>news:9ZWsb.661$Ue4.222@fed1read01
>>
>> You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
>> You should be embarrassed and ashamed.
>
>Scotty, since you've rendered your judgement without regard for any evidence
>or discussion I might present, there is obviously no need for me to provide
>any evidence or discussion. Your mind is made up and that is that. End of
>discussion.

IOW, he's right and you're wrong.

End of discussion.

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:9ZWsb.661$Ue4.222@fed1read01
>
> You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
> You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

Scotty, since you've rendered your judgement without regard for any evidence
or discussion I might present, there is obviously no need for me to provide
any evidence or discussion. Your mind is made up and that is that. End of
discussion.

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said to ****-for-Brains:

> IOW, he's right and you're wrong.
> End of discussion.

That I'd like to see. There's a first time for everything.

[ScottW]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:9ZWsb.661$Ue4.222@fed1read01
> >
> > You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
> > You should be embarrassed and ashamed.
>
> Scotty, since you've rendered your judgement without regard for any
evidence
> or discussion I might present, there is obviously no need for me to
provide
> any evidence or discussion. Your mind is made up and that is that. End of
> discussion.

I presented the evidence. It is irrefutable fact.
Rather than admit your error, you slink away muttering
nonsense.

You're a liar, an idiot, a coward, a hypocrite,
and a pussy.

Is there anything left for you?
Besides Trots I mean.

ScottW

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:9ZWsb.661$Ue4.222@fed1read01
> >
> > You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
> > You should be embarrassed and ashamed.
>
> Scotty, since you've rendered your judgement without regard for any
evidence
> or discussion I might present, there is obviously no need for me to
provide
> any evidence or discussion. Your mind is made up and that is that. End of
> discussion.
>
>

Arny, it only took me about a week to figure you out what an asshole you
are.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Arny Krueger]

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message


> Arny, it only took me about a week to figure you out what an asshole
> you are.

Which week was that? Give us a date.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
>
>
> > Arny, it only took me about a week to figure you out what an asshole
> > you are.
>
> Which week was that? Give us a date.
>

Look moron, it was the first week I ran into you,
It dosan't matter what the particular date was, unless
you want to celebrate the anniversary with a cake.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Arny Krueger]

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message


> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...

>> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
>>

>>> Arny, it only took me about a week to figure you out what an asshole
>>> you are.

>> Which week was that? Give us a date.

> Look moron, it was the first week I ran into you,

Since you seem to like to obsess over commas sockpuppet Yustabe, why not
explain why you ended this sentence with a comma.

> It dosan't matter what the particular date was, unless
> you want to celebrate the anniversary with a cake.

Since you like to tell us what a great literary giant you are, please tell
us what a "dosan't" is, sockpuppet Yustabe.

Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it obviously is a
figment of your imagination.

Does it hurt when Middius pulls all your strings at once, sockpuppet
Yustabe?

[dave weil]

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:53:09 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it obviously is a
>figment of your imagination.

He's keeping the information in his pocket.

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message

> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:53:09 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>> Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it
>> obviously is a figment of your imagination.
>
> He's keeping the information in his pocket.

Weil, I'm glad to see you've recovered your composure and are not trying to
cover us with c*m, like you did yesterday.

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said to ****-for-Brains:

> >Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it obviously is a
> >figment of your imagination.

> He's keeping the information in his pocket.

Krooger's verbal dingleberries have recently taken on the flavor of
therapy jargon. I can easily imagine Mr. **** hearing those exact
words from his doctor in response to one of his paranoid conspiracy
theories.

[dave weil]

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:25:52 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"dave weil" > wrote in message

>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:53:09 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it
>>> obviously is a figment of your imagination.
>>
>> He's keeping the information in his pocket.
>
>Weil, I'm glad to see you've recovered your composure and are not trying to
>cover us with c*m, like you did yesterday.

It wasn't me that did that, you know.

But thanks for your admission that your charges against Yustabe are
groundless.

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message

> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:25:52 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>> "dave weil" > wrote in message
>>
>>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:53:09 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it
>>>> obviously is a figment of your imagination.
>>>
>>> He's keeping the information in his pocket.

>> Weil, I'm glad to see you've recovered your composure and are not
>> trying to cover us with c*m, like you did yesterday.

> It wasn't me that did that, you know.

Hmm:

this post:

Path:
internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.g iganews.com!border1.nntp.a
sh.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1. giganews.com!border3.nntp.
aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed1.easy news.com!easynews.com!easy
news!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!bigfeed.bellsouth.net! bignumb.bellsouth.net!news
..bellsouth.net!bignews6.bellsouth.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dave weil >
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Subject: Re: Note to Arny the liar
Message-ID: >
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
X-Trace:
ofjmidbaofeaohdodbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbone hkmghdobfbolfhpemhpmfdmkbi
gbljkkkcjffmggaajlnookinkfmpjfmnlkoicmckcmcogcpjoo fmkapakpmnlckljeheekfngodf
appodfma
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:02:20 EST
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:03:55 -0600
Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:694736

that post:

Path:
internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.g iganews.com!border1.nntp.a
sh.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1. giganews.com!border1.nntp.
aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news2 me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.
com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!b igfeed2.bellsouth.net!bigf
eed.bellsouth.net!bignumb.bellsouth.net!news.bells outh.net!bignews5.bellsout
h.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dave weil >
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Subject: Re: Note to Arny the liar
Message-ID: >
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 107
X-Trace:
ldjgbllpbapjglppdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbofm ocmoeldfkendlibmgbiiaelend
edobkkkcjffmggaajlnocopgffbgecafgifdcmckcmcogcpjoo fmcldahcipbogjgiibfjebpcld
jjpilnie
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:12:05 EST
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:15:07 -0600
Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:694564


I think that you've got more than a little explaining to do Weil or whoever
you are, including with what happened to your Comcast account on or around
9/11/2003.

> But thanks for your admission that your charges against Yustabe are
> groundless.

More delusional patter from who-knows-who-it-is.

[dave weil]

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:20:42 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"dave weil" > wrote in message

>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:25:52 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "dave weil" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:53:09 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it
>>>>> obviously is a figment of your imagination.
>>>>
>>>> He's keeping the information in his pocket.
>
>>> Weil, I'm glad to see you've recovered your composure and are not
>>> trying to cover us with c*m, like you did yesterday.
>
>> It wasn't me that did that, you know.
>
>Hmm:
>
>this post:
>
>Path:
>internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.g iganews.com!border1.nntp.a
>sh.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1. giganews.com!border3.nntp.
>aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed1.easy news.com!easynews.com!easy
>news!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!bigfeed.bellsouth.net! bignumb.bellsouth.net!news
>.bellsouth.net!bignews6.bellsouth.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
>From: dave weil >
>Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
>Subject: Re: Note to Arny the liar
>Message-ID: >
>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Lines: 20
>X-Trace:
>ofjmidbaofeaohdodbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbone hkmghdobfbolfhpemhpmfdmkbi
>gbljkkkcjffmggaajlnookinkfmpjfmnlkoicmckcmcogcpjoo fmkapakpmnlckljeheekfngodf
>appodfma
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:02:20 EST
>Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:03:55 -0600
>Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:694736
>
>that post:
>
>Path:
>internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.g iganews.com!border1.nntp.a
>sh.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1. giganews.com!border1.nntp.
>aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news2 me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.
>com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!b igfeed2.bellsouth.net!bigf
>eed.bellsouth.net!bignumb.bellsouth.net!news.bells outh.net!bignews5.bellsout
>h.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
>From: dave weil >
>Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
>Subject: Re: Note to Arny the liar
>Message-ID: >
>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Lines: 107
>X-Trace:
>ldjgbllpbapjglppdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbofm ocmoeldfkendlibmgbiiaelend
>edobkkkcjffmggaajlnocopgffbgecafgifdcmckcmcogcpjoo fmcldahcipbogjgiibfjebpcld
>jjpilnie
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:12:05 EST
>Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:15:07 -0600
>Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:694564
>
>
>I think that you've got more than a little explaining to do Weil or whoever
>you are, including with what happened to your Comcast account on or around
>9/11/2003.

It's not surprising that you missed my point, which was that it was
*you* who came all over the newsgroup yesterday and it was me who
pointed that out. I wasn't claiming that someone had forged my posts.

As to my Comcast account? I'm pretty sure I covered that at the time.
I switched from cable to a Direct TV satellite dish system because I
was tired of all of the Comcast rate increases. I changed to DSL since
my internet access was going to go up another $8 without the cable TV
service and I was able to keep it at $49.95 by going to BellSouth.
IIRC, I announced almost 2 weeks before the switchover was going to
occur that I was going to be changing my internet provider.

I suspect that you know all of this and just want to muddy the waters
yet again. This is your M.O.. Oftentimes, you are too sleazy to even
make a direct charge, but try to cast aspersions by second-hand means.

I trust that I've answered your questions regarding my ISP to your
satisfaction.

>> But thanks for your admission that your charges against Yustabe are
>> groundless.
>
>More delusional patter from who-knows-who-it-is.

Hardly.

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message


> It's not surprising that you missed my point, which was that it was
> *you* who came all over the newsgroup yesterday and it was me who
> pointed that out.

Classic case of Weil's delusional "Arny made me do it" reprehensible
behavior.

Here's the post in which Weil demonstrated near-total meltdown, yesterday.



....as if anybody with a brain besides me, as the usual target of Weil's lies
would care.

[dave weil]

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:14:51 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"dave weil" > wrote in message

>
>> It's not surprising that you missed my point, which was that it was
>> *you* who came all over the newsgroup yesterday and it was me who
>> pointed that out.
>
>Classic case of Weil's delusional "Arny made me do it" reprehensible
>behavior.

What? You made yourself misread my post?

I would think this would be clear.

>Here's the post in which Weil demonstrated near-total meltdown, yesterday.
>


Nothing in there to indicate the above charge.

Sorry, you lose.

Again.

>...as if anybody with a brain besides me, as the usual target of Weil's lies
>would care.

Damn Krooglish.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> > Look moron, it was the first week I ran into you,
>
> Since you seem to like to obsess over commas sockpuppet Yustabe, why not
> explain why you ended this sentence with a comma.
>

A typo.


> > It dosan't matter what the particular date was, unless
> > you want to celebrate the anniversary with a cake.
>
> Since you like to tell us what a great literary giant you are, please tell
> us what a "dosan't" is, sockpuppet Yustabe.
>

A typo


> Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it obviously is a
> figment of your imagination.

You want the exact date I figured out you were an asshole? What are you
going to do with that bit of info?


> Does it hurt when Middius pulls all your strings at once, sockpuppet
> Yustabe?
>

I have never met the man, never spoken to him on the phone, and have
rarely received any emails from him. I guess we communicate by telepathy.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:53:09 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
> >Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it obviously is
a
> >figment of your imagination.
>
> He's keeping the information in his pocket.

Sorry, I forgot to remove it the last time I washed my shirts.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[George M. Middius]

Sockpuppet Yustabe said to ****-for-Brains:

> > Does it hurt when Middius pulls all your strings at once, sockpuppet
> > Yustabe?

> I have never met the man, never spoken to him on the phone, and have
> rarely received any emails from him. I guess we communicate by telepathy.

Krooger is totally enamored of his pet theory that I control people by
the great power of my mind. If a sane person made that allegation, I
would be flattered. From Krooger, however, it's a different kettle of
turds.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "dave weil" > wrote in message
>
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:25:52 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> "dave weil" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:53:09 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Since you can't cite a date not even an approximate one, it
> >>>> obviously is a figment of your imagination.
> >>>
> >>> He's keeping the information in his pocket.
>
> >> Weil, I'm glad to see you've recovered your composure and are not
> >> trying to cover us with c*m, like you did yesterday.
>
> > It wasn't me that did that, you know.
>
> Hmm:
>
> this post:
>
> Path:
>
internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.g iganews.com!border1.nntp.a
>
sh.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1. giganews.com!border3.nntp.
>
aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed1.easy news.com!easynews.com!easy
>
news!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!bigfeed.bellsouth.net! bignumb.bellsouth.net!news
> .bellsouth.net!bignews6.bellsouth.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: dave weil >
> Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
> Subject: Re: Note to Arny the liar
> Message-ID: >
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 20
> X-Trace:
>
ofjmidbaofeaohdodbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbone hkmghdobfbolfhpemhpmfdmkbi
>
gbljkkkcjffmggaajlnookinkfmpjfmnlkoicmckcmcogcpjoo fmkapakpmnlckljeheekfngodf
> appodfma
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:02:20 EST
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:03:55 -0600
> Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:694736
>
> that post:
>
> Path:
>
internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.g iganews.com!border1.nntp.a
>
sh.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1. giganews.com!border1.nntp.
>
aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news2 me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.
>
com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!b igfeed2.bellsouth.net!bigf
>
eed.bellsouth.net!bignumb.bellsouth.net!news.bells outh.net!bignews5.bellsout
> h.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: dave weil >
> Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
> Subject: Re: Note to Arny the liar
> Message-ID: >
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 107
> X-Trace:
>
ldjgbllpbapjglppdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbofm ocmoeldfkendlibmgbiiaelend
>
edobkkkcjffmggaajlnocopgffbgecafgifdcmckcmcogcpjoo fmcldahcipbogjgiibfjebpcld
> jjpilnie
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:12:05 EST
> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:15:07 -0600
> Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:694564
>
>
> I think that you've got more than a little explaining to do Weil or
whoever
> you are, including with what happened to your Comcast account on or around
> 9/11/2003.
>
> > But thanks for your admission that your charges against Yustabe are
> > groundless.
>
> More delusional patter from who-knows-who-it-is.
>
>

Wow! You have shown us that Dave posted twice to this group!
Too bad you forgot to indicate what he said, and how that
would be relevant to your point.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---