Robert Morein
December 4th 05, 11:53 PM
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:18:37 GMT, DanKaye >
wrote:
>On 3 Dec 2005 22:42:31 -0800, " >
>wrote:
>>"Phil Allison" >wrote
>>
>>"I read that perhaps it was the cuban doorman.
>>That Chapman was a patsy, manchurian candidate. "
>>
>>Chapman was a Mark, not a Patsy, and the Manchurian Candidate was just
>>a movie.
>>
>>The Cuban Doormen. I LIKE that name though. The CUBAN DOORMEN.
>>
>>TH
>>
>>(JMHO: It is actually possible for nut cases to come out of the
>>woodwork and accomplish all manner of evil completely on their own,
>>with no help, no conspiracy, ånd no rational explanation that helps us
>>sleep easier).
>>
>>TH
>Even paranoids sometimes truly are being surveiled.
>
>It IS possible that Lennon was a victim of a Manchurian Candidate (ie;
>a hypnotized killer) as Robert F. Kennedy was. Though in RFK's case
>Sirhan Sirhan, the Manchurian Candidate was only the distraction,
>while the guard pulled the gun and shot RFK.) Before dismissing this
>idea out of hand, do a little research on it. Look at how the LAPD
>refused to interview people, how they badgered witnesses into saying
>what they wanted them to say, how they did not account for all the
>bullet holes in the kitchen nor investigate them, etc. etc. etc..
>
>As for Lennon, the evidence has never been strong enough to sway me
>that MDC was a manchurian candidate. But I do not deny it is possible.
>
>That said, this Salvador guy only makes all conspiracy theories seem
>crazy, because he (Salvador) is a nutcase. However, he is not the only
>one who has proposed the MC theory re Lennon; there are others more
>respectable who have brought forth some evidence.
>
>As for RFK, there is ample evidence to convince a jury that S.S. was a
>Manchurian Candidate, in my humble opinion, but this is not the place
>to discuss that. I only put it in as it relates to the OP's post.
Doesn't that Salvador nutcase have a webpage?
wrote:
>On 3 Dec 2005 22:42:31 -0800, " >
>wrote:
>>"Phil Allison" >wrote
>>
>>"I read that perhaps it was the cuban doorman.
>>That Chapman was a patsy, manchurian candidate. "
>>
>>Chapman was a Mark, not a Patsy, and the Manchurian Candidate was just
>>a movie.
>>
>>The Cuban Doormen. I LIKE that name though. The CUBAN DOORMEN.
>>
>>TH
>>
>>(JMHO: It is actually possible for nut cases to come out of the
>>woodwork and accomplish all manner of evil completely on their own,
>>with no help, no conspiracy, ånd no rational explanation that helps us
>>sleep easier).
>>
>>TH
>Even paranoids sometimes truly are being surveiled.
>
>It IS possible that Lennon was a victim of a Manchurian Candidate (ie;
>a hypnotized killer) as Robert F. Kennedy was. Though in RFK's case
>Sirhan Sirhan, the Manchurian Candidate was only the distraction,
>while the guard pulled the gun and shot RFK.) Before dismissing this
>idea out of hand, do a little research on it. Look at how the LAPD
>refused to interview people, how they badgered witnesses into saying
>what they wanted them to say, how they did not account for all the
>bullet holes in the kitchen nor investigate them, etc. etc. etc..
>
>As for Lennon, the evidence has never been strong enough to sway me
>that MDC was a manchurian candidate. But I do not deny it is possible.
>
>That said, this Salvador guy only makes all conspiracy theories seem
>crazy, because he (Salvador) is a nutcase. However, he is not the only
>one who has proposed the MC theory re Lennon; there are others more
>respectable who have brought forth some evidence.
>
>As for RFK, there is ample evidence to convince a jury that S.S. was a
>Manchurian Candidate, in my humble opinion, but this is not the place
>to discuss that. I only put it in as it relates to the OP's post.
Doesn't that Salvador nutcase have a webpage?