Happiness

[Clyde Slick]

National happiness scores for RAO contributors:

USA 7.4
France 6.6
Great Britain 7.1
The Netherlands 7.5
Australia 7.7

http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.htm

[Robert Morein]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> National happiness scores for RAO contributors:
>
> USA 7.4
> France 6.6
> Great Britain 7.1
> The Netherlands 7.5
> Australia 7.7
>
> http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.htm
Arny is dragging our score down.
Paul is pulling Australia's score up, but the effect may be negated by
McCarty.

[Margaret von B.]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> National happiness scores for RAO contributors:
>
> USA 7.4
> France 6.6
> Great Britain 7.1
> The Netherlands 7.5
> Australia 7.7
>Grosse Pointe Shores -9.4
> http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.htm
>

Interesting. :-)

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :

> National happiness scores for RAO contributors:
>
> USA 7.4
> France 6.6
> Great Britain 7.1
> The Netherlands 7.5
> Australia 7.7
>
> http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.htm


French national sport !
LOL, you'd really need to leave your CDG bunker... :-D

PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness
I will follow you in this way. ;-)
No, no it's too difficult !!! Please just try to provide me with an
universal one. :-D


--
Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?

Dave Weil - Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 -0500

[dave weil]

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:55:08 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>
>PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness

You've already definedYOURS. It revolves around me.

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick a écrit :
>
>> National happiness scores for RAO contributors:
>>
>> USA 7.4
>> France 6.6
>> Great Britain 7.1
>> The Netherlands 7.5
>> Australia 7.7
>>
>> http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.htm
>
>
> French national sport !
> LOL, you'd really need to leave your CDG bunker... :-D
>
> PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness I
> will follow you in this way. ;-)
> No, no it's too difficult !!! Please just try to provide me with an
> universal one. :-D
>

The questions asked were supposedly identical.
Individuals were simply asked to rate how happy they are.
BTW, you do not seem to be a very
happy person.

[Ruud Broens]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
:
: "Lionel" > wrote in message
: ...
: > Clyde Slick a écrit :
: >
: >> National happiness scores for RAO contributors:
: >>
: >> USA 7.4
: >> France 6.6
: >> Great Britain 7.1
: >> The Netherlands 7.5
: >> Australia 7.7
: >>
: >> http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.htm
: >
: >
: > French national sport !
: > LOL, you'd really need to leave your CDG bunker... :-D
: >
: > PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness I
: > will follow you in this way. ;-)
: > No, no it's too difficult !!! Please just try to provide me with an
: > universal one. :-D
: >
:
: The questions asked were supposedly identical.
: Individuals were simply asked to rate how happy they are.
: BTW, you do not seem to be a very
: happy person.
:
a good happiness indicaator is whistling while at work:
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/physics-05g.html
:-)
Rudy

[Lionel]

In >, dave weil wrote :

> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:55:08 +0100, Lionel >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness
>
> You've already definedYOURS. It revolves around me.


LOL !


--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[Lionel]

Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :

>
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Clyde Slick a écrit :
>>
>>> National happiness scores for RAO contributors:
>>>
>>> USA 7.4
>>> France 6.6
>>> Great Britain 7.1
>>> The Netherlands 7.5
>>> Australia 7.7
>>>
>>> http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.htm
>>
>>
>> French national sport !
>> LOL, you'd really need to leave your CDG bunker... :-D
>>
>> PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness
>> I will follow you in this way. ;-)
>> No, no it's too difficult !!! Please just try to provide me with an
>> universal one. :-D
>>
>
> The questions asked were supposedly identical.

This is my point.

> Individuals were simply asked to rate how happy they are.

French people are never "happy". Your definition of happiness haven't any
sens here.

> BTW, you do not seem to be a very
> happy person.

Sorry Arthur but I'm a very happy person.
"At least" I'm happy to not live with your fears... ;-)



--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[ScottW]

Lionel wrote:
> Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :
>
> > BTW, you do not seem to be a very
> > happy person.
>
> Sorry Arthur but I'm a very happy person.
> "At least" I'm happy to not live with your fears... ;-)
>

Lionel is proof that ignorance is bliss.

ScottW

[Lionel]

In >, Ruud Broens wrote :

>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
> :
> : "Lionel" > wrote in message
> : ...
> : > Clyde Slick a écrit :
> : >
> : >> National happiness scores for RAO contributors:
> : >>
> : >> USA 7.4
> : >> France 6.6
> : >> Great Britain 7.1
> : >> The Netherlands 7.5
> : >> Australia 7.7
> : >>
> : >> http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.htm
> : >
> : >
> : > French national sport !
> : > LOL, you'd really need to leave your CDG bunker... :-D
> : >
> : > PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of
> : > happiness I will follow you in this way. ;-)
> : > No, no it's too difficult !!! Please just try to provide me with an
> : > universal one. :-D
> : >
> :
> : The questions asked were supposedly identical.
> : Individuals were simply asked to rate how happy they are.
> : BTW, you do not seem to be a very
> : happy person.
> :
> a good happiness indicaator is whistling while at work:
> http://www.spacedaily.com/news/physics-05g.html
> :-)

I have tried but I prefer to sing it's more swinging and less tiring.


--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[Lionel]

In . com>, ScottW wrote :

>
> Lionel wrote:
>> Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :
>>
>> > BTW, you do not seem to be a very
>> > happy person.
>>
>> Sorry Arthur but I'm a very happy person.
>> "At least" I'm happy to not live with your fears... ;-)
>>
>
> Lionel is proof that ignorance is bliss.

Since ScottW is proof that stupidity doesn't kill. :-)

--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :
>
>>
>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Clyde Slick a écrit :
>>>
>>>> National happiness scores for RAO contributors:
>>>>
>>>> USA 7.4
>>>> France 6.6
>>>> Great Britain 7.1
>>>> The Netherlands 7.5
>>>> Australia 7.7
>>>>
>>>> http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.htm
>>>
>>>
>>> French national sport !
>>> LOL, you'd really need to leave your CDG bunker... :-D
>>>
>>> PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness
>>> I will follow you in this way. ;-)
>>> No, no it's too difficult !!! Please just try to provide me with an
>>> universal one. :-D
>>>
>>
>> The questions asked were supposedly identical.
>
> This is my point.
>
>> Individuals were simply asked to rate how happy they are.
>
> French people are never "happy". Your definition of happiness haven't any
> sens here.
>
>> BTW, you do not seem to be a very
>> happy person.
>
> Sorry Arthur but I'm a very happy person.
> "At least" I'm happy to not live with your fears... ;-)
>

"at least" I am happy not to live in France.

[paul packer]

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:39:27 -0600, dave weil >
wrote:

>On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:55:08 +0100, Lionel >
>wrote:
>
>>
>>PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness
>
>You've already definedYOURS. It revolves around me.

You've noticed that too, Dave.

[Lionel]

Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :


> "at least" I am happy not to live in France.

"At least" we are 60 millions to be happy of this decision. :-D


--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[Lionel]

In >, paul packer wrote :

> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:39:27 -0600, dave weil >
> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:55:08 +0100, Lionel >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness
>>
>>You've already definedYOURS. It revolves around me.
>
> You've noticed that too, Dave.


Really ?
I don't care about this braggart. I have just been happy that he asked me to
help him to make an ass of himself.
BTW I must say that's it's very funny when Dave is jiggling like a little
fish hanged at my fishing line.



--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[dave weil]

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:18:39 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>In >, paul packer wrote :
>
>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:39:27 -0600, dave weil >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:55:08 +0100, Lionel >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of happiness
>>>
>>>You've already definedYOURS. It revolves around me.
>>
>> You've noticed that too, Dave.
>
>
>Really ?
>I don't care about this braggart. I have just been happy that he asked me to
>help him to make an ass of himself.
>BTW I must say that's it's very funny when Dave is jiggling like a little
>fish hanged at my fishing line.

Glad to give your empty life a little meaning, Lionel. Now, back to
the rocking chair for you.

[Lionel]

In >, dave weil wrote :

> On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:18:39 +0100, Lionel >
> wrote:
>
>>In >, paul packer wrote :
>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:39:27 -0600, dave weil >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:55:08 +0100, Lionel >
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>PS : as soon as you will provide me an objective definition of
>>>>>happiness
>>>>
>>>>You've already definedYOURS. It revolves around me.
>>>
>>> You've noticed that too, Dave.
>>
>>
>>Really ?
>>I don't care about this braggart. I have just been happy that he asked me
>>to help him to make an ass of himself.
>>BTW I must say that's it's very funny when Dave is jiggling like a little
>>fish hanged at my fishing line.
>
> Glad to give your empty life a little meaning, Lionel. Now, back to
> the rocking chair for you.

That's right. I can fish from my rocking chair.
What a sport...


--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[dave weil]

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:13:45 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>> Glad to give your empty life a little meaning, Lionel. Now, back to
>> the rocking chair for you.
>
>That's right. I can fish from my rocking chair.
>What a sport...

I guess so. Personally, it sounds pretty boring to me, but you're
welcome to your rocking chair sports, deaf gramps. Now, put the
hearing aid back in so that you can enjoy your muzak.

[Lionel]

dave "deaf" weil wrote :

> Now, put the
> hearing aid back in so that you can enjoy your muzak.

"At least" I don't pretend to review speakers... :-)



--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[dave weil]

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:13:27 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>dave "deaf" weil wrote :
>
>> Now, put the
>> hearing aid back in so that you can enjoy your muzak.
>
>"At least" I don't pretend to review speakers... :-)

I'll pretend to review speakers and you can continue to be a deaf
muzak listener confined to the rocking chair. That's a trade that I'll
take every day.

[Lionel]

dave "deaf" weil wrote :


> I'll pretend to review speakers

Congratulations... Beethoven was writing some music !
BTW it's not a big danger, since nobody read you. ;-)



--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :
>
>
>> "at least" I am happy not to live in France.
>
> "At least" we are 60 millions to be happy of this decision. :-D
>

I assume you are not talking of your
immigrant population. Just the arrogant
natural born French.

[Lionel]

Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister a écrit :


> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :
>>
>>
>>
>>>"at least" I am happy not to live in France.
>>
>>"At least" we are 60 millions to be happy of this decision. :-D
>>
>
>
> I assume you are not talking of your
> immigrant population. Just the arrogant
> natural born French.

I assume that you are not speaking in the name of the real Americans ?
I mean the natural born Americans... :-D



--
Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?

Dave Weil - Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 -0500

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister a écrit :
>
>
>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"at least" I am happy not to live in France.
>>>
>>>"At least" we are 60 millions to be happy of this decision. :-D
>>>
>>
>>
>> I assume you are not talking of your
>> immigrant population. Just the arrogant
>> natural born French.
>
> I assume that you are not speaking in the name of the real Americans ?
> I mean the natural born Americans... :-D
>

I am a natural born American.
You probably meant native Americans
Well, sort of, there ancestors came her a long
time ago from Asia. They are of immigrants
also!

[dave weil]

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:38:26 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>dave "deaf" weil wrote :
>
>
>> I'll pretend to review speakers
>
>Congratulations...

and you can continue to be a deaf muzak listener confined to the
rocking chair. That's a trade that I'll
take every day.

BTW, thanks for the comparison to Beethoven. But I'll take the Fifth
on that.

[Ruud Broens]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
: On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:38:26 +0100, Lionel >
: wrote:
:
: >dave "deaf" weil wrote :
: >
: >
: >> I'll pretend to review speakers
: >
: >Congratulations...
:
: and you can continue to be a deaf muzak listener confined to the
: rocking chair. That's a trade that I'll
: take every day.

Well, Lionel ^posted he was familiar with Underworld - Beaucoup Fish
...at least, _that's not elevator music_ :-)
Rudy

^about "Jumbo"
:
: BTW, thanks for the comparison to Beethoven. But I'll take the Fifth
: on that.
:

[Lionel]

deaf-dave wrote :

> On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:38:26 +0100, Lionel >
> wrote:
>
>>dave "deaf" weil wrote :
>>
>>
>>> I'll pretend to review speakers
>>
>>Congratulations...
>
> and you can continue to be a deaf muzak listener confined to the
> rocking chair. That's a trade that I'll
> take every day.


I will give you music advices as soon as you will have remove all this
marshmallow from your ears.


> BTW, thanks for the comparison to Beethoven. But I'll take the Fifth
> on that.


Perhaps that if you play it very very loud... ;-)


--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15