Resolved, Krueger's pastor will not be called.

[Robert Morein]

The concensus seems unanimously against this.

Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.

You are loved more than you know.

[Margaret von B.]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>
> Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>
> You are loved more than you know.

Hi Rob!

How on earth did you come up with that conclusion? Despite my comments to
you, Arnii is, has always been and will always be a bitter, vile, worthless
piece of ****. But as long as he stays off my property and doesn't stalk me,
he has every right to be that way. If that changes...well, let's just say
that my Great Danes will make chum out of him. :-)

Haven't you noticed that Arny has gotten *exactly* what he has deserved in
life. What would be the point of interfering with that?


Cheers,

Margaret

[ScottW]

Robert Morein wrote:
> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>
> Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>
> You are loved more than you know.


Lets take a poll on the stupidity of Robert's poll. If Robert's
poll wasn't the stupidest display ever brought to the RAO, what was?

Only thing I'll give the nod to for stupidity was Trots response to
getting flowers. Not to say that your poll, Robert, wasn't just as
stupid. I just have to give kudos to Trots for his episodes humor
content. Your poll was incredibly stupid, quite revealing of your own
lack of character and what can happen when usenet becomes your life,
but it was unforgiveably boring as well. Matter of fact... I think
your increasingly boorish presence on RAO is one of the reasons the
group is being shunned or closed out. You've shown a glimmer of
awareness in seeing the symptom but you're completely lacking in
intellectual capacity to find the cause.

Perhaps a little spiritual guidance is needed in your life. Or maybe
just some spirits.

ScottW

[ScottW]

Margaret von B. wrote:
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> > The concensus seems unanimously against this.
> >
> > Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
> >
> > You are loved more than you know.
>
> Hi Rob!
>
> How on earth did you come up with that conclusion? Despite my comments to
> you, Arnii is, has always been and will always be a bitter, vile, worthless
> piece of ****. But as long as he stays off my property and doesn't stalk me,

Who else thinks Margaret wouldn't be thrilled to be stalked at this
stage of
her life?..... oh well, the Danes are probably too tired for serious
guard duty anyway.

ScottW

[Margaret von B.]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Margaret von B. wrote:
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>> >
>> > Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>> >
>> > You are loved more than you know.
>>
>> Hi Rob!
>>
>> How on earth did you come up with that conclusion? Despite my comments to
>> you, Arnii is, has always been and will always be a bitter, vile,
>> worthless
>> piece of ****. But as long as he stays off my property and doesn't stalk
>> me,
>
> Who else thinks Margaret wouldn't be thrilled to be stalked at this
> stage of
> her life?.....

Certainly not by a miniature poodle like you, Scott. Your wife seems to
agree given your recent loneliness on this board... :-)


Cheers,

Margaret

[Margaret von B.]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Perhaps a little spiritual guidance is needed in your life. Or maybe
> just some spirits.
>
> ScottW
>

Perhaps you need a little bit of woofer in your life, Scott. You're all
tweeter now. LOL!


Cheers,

Margaret

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
>> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>>
[snip]
> Perhaps a little spiritual guidance is needed in your life. Or maybe
> just some spirits.
>
I'm sorry, Scott, but I don't drink.
I'm at the local Starbucks, having my 2nd pumpkin spice latte vente.
May I suggest that absinthe may be to your taste?
Regular consumption is said to be quite invigorating.

[ScottW]

Margaret von B. wrote:
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > Margaret von B. wrote:
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > The concensus seems unanimously against this.
> >> >
> >> > Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
> >> >
> >> > You are loved more than you know.
> >>
> >> Hi Rob!
> >>
> >> How on earth did you come up with that conclusion? Despite my comments to
> >> you, Arnii is, has always been and will always be a bitter, vile,
> >> worthless
> >> piece of ****. But as long as he stays off my property and doesn't stalk
> >> me,
> >
> > Who else thinks Margaret wouldn't be thrilled to be stalked at this
> > stage of
> > her life?.....
>
> Certainly not by a miniature poodle like you, Scott.

Ah... so you would like to be stalked, just not by me. Well, no
worries there. Perhaps if you kept the dog fetish a little more
discrete you might have some luck.

ScottW

[ScottW]

Robert Morein wrote:
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > Robert Morein wrote:
> >> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
> >>
> [snip]
> > Perhaps a little spiritual guidance is needed in your life. Or maybe
> > just some spirits.
> >
> I'm sorry, Scott, but I don't drink.

Gee... how could I tell?

> I'm at the local Starbucks, having my 2nd pumpkin spice latte vente.

Great, a latte drinker... I'm sure that takes you out of
consideration for Marges stalker position she is seeking to fill.

ScottW

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com

> Who else thinks Margaret wouldn't be thrilled to be
> stalked at this stage of her life?.....

...not to mention this sex of her life...

[ScottW]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> oups.com
>
> > Who else thinks Margaret wouldn't be thrilled to be
> > stalked at this stage of her life?.....
>
> ..not to mention this sex of her life...

oh brother, Arny got into the sacrament again ... Arny needs a latte
and Robert needs a drink... and Maggie... well somebody should consider
calling PETA.

ScottW

[paul packer]

On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:

>
>Robert Morein wrote:
>> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>>
>> Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>>
>> You are loved more than you know.
>
>
> Lets take a poll on the stupidity of Robert's poll. If Robert's
>poll wasn't the stupidest display ever brought to the RAO, what was?

Etc... etc...

The suggestion was silly, but I think Robert knew that; as I've said
elsewhere I think he was just sounding the group. However, can you say
absolutely that the motive was not altruistic? Robert's a thinker, a
compliment that can't be extended to all who post here. He's obviously
observed in Arny's posts, as have others before him, a disturbing lack
of self-awareness and empathy for others, the kind of intense
ego-centricity typical of what is called "psychiatric problems". But
hey, these problems are just intensifications of what we all suffer
from; IOW, it's just a matter of degree. Maybe that's what bothers us
about them: that we see the same thing in ourselves.

I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.

[.]

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:29:26 GMT, (paul packer)
wrote:

>On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>>
>>Robert Morein wrote:
>>> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>>>
>>> Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>>>
>>> You are loved more than you know.
>>
>>
>> Lets take a poll on the stupidity of Robert's poll. If Robert's
>>poll wasn't the stupidest display ever brought to the RAO, what was?
>
>Etc... etc...
>
>The suggestion was silly, but I think Robert knew that; as I've said
>elsewhere I think he was just sounding the group. However, can you say
>absolutely that the motive was not altruistic? Robert's a thinker, a
>compliment that can't be extended to all who post here. He's obviously
>observed in Arny's posts, as have others before him, a disturbing lack
>of self-awareness and empathy for others, the kind of intense
>ego-centricity typical of what is called "psychiatric problems". But
>hey, these problems are just intensifications of what we all suffer
>from; IOW, it's just a matter of degree. Maybe that's what bothers us
>about them: that we see the same thing in ourselves.
>
> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
>than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.

Robert is a friggin idiot who knows nothing about anything outside his
bedroom door.

[ScottW]

paul packer wrote:
> On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> >
> >Robert Morein wrote:
> >> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
> >>
> >> Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
> >>
> >> You are loved more than you know.
> >
> >
> > Lets take a poll on the stupidity of Robert's poll. If Robert's
> >poll wasn't the stupidest display ever brought to the RAO, what was?
>
> Etc... etc...
>
> The suggestion was silly, but I think Robert knew that; as I've said
> elsewhere I think he was just sounding the group. However, can you say
> absolutely that the motive was not altruistic? Robert's a thinker, a
> compliment that can't be extended to all who post here. He's obviously
> observed in Arny's posts, as have others before him, a disturbing lack
> of self-awareness and empathy for others, the kind of intense
> ego-centricity typical of what is called "psychiatric problems". But
> hey, these problems are just intensifications of what we all suffer
> from; IOW, it's just a matter of degree. Maybe that's what bothers us
> about them: that we see the same thing in ourselves.
>
> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.

The suggestion was silly... Robert knew it was silly.... but still
comes off as being constructive..... Careful... with that kind of
logic Robert will want to talk with your pastor next.

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

<.> wrote in message ...
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:29:26 GMT, (paul packer)

Brian is going for shorter sockpuppets.

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> paul packer wrote:
>> On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>
[snip].
>>
>> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
>> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.
>
> The suggestion was silly... Robert knew it was silly.... but still
> comes off as being constructive..... Careful... with that kind of
> logic Robert will want to talk with your pastor next.
>
> ScottW
>
I would only convey compliments.

[ScottW]

Robert Morein wrote:
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > paul packer wrote:
> >> On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
> >>
> [snip].
> >>
> >> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
> >> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.
> >
> > The suggestion was silly... Robert knew it was silly.... but still
> > comes off as being constructive..... Careful... with that kind of
> > logic Robert will want to talk with your pastor next.
> >
> > ScottW
> >
> I would only convey compliments.

But you're not too stable and subject to severe changes in temperment
and disposition....especially if you don't get your latte.

ScottW

[.]

On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:58:11 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>
><.> wrote in message ...
>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:29:26 GMT, (paul packer)
>
>Brian is going for shorter sockpuppets.
>

Only a madman could accuse a full stop of being Brian.

BTW I am as far away from Cairns as you are from Alaska.

but don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.

[.]

On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 20:29:17 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>
>"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>
>> Robert Morein wrote:
>>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>>> oups.com...
>>> >
>>> > paul packer wrote:
>>> >> On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> [snip].
>>> >>
>>> >> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
>>> >> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.
>>> >
>>> > The suggestion was silly... Robert knew it was silly.... but still
>>> > comes off as being constructive..... Careful... with that kind of
>>> > logic Robert will want to talk with your pastor next.
>>> >
>>> > ScottW
>>> >
>>> I would only convey compliments.
>>
>> But you're not too stable and subject to severe changes in temperment
>> and disposition....especially if you don't get your latte.
>>
>> ScottW
>>
>No problem. I have a Starbucks Barista espresso machine.


how does it taste with Bakin Robbins ice cream?

LOL

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> >
>> > paul packer wrote:
>> >> On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>> >>
>> [snip].
>> >>
>> >> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
>> >> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.
>> >
>> > The suggestion was silly... Robert knew it was silly.... but still
>> > comes off as being constructive..... Careful... with that kind of
>> > logic Robert will want to talk with your pastor next.
>> >
>> > ScottW
>> >
>> I would only convey compliments.
>
> But you're not too stable and subject to severe changes in temperment
> and disposition....especially if you don't get your latte.
>
> ScottW
>
No problem. I have a Starbucks Barista espresso machine.

[Margaret von B.]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> >
>> > Robert Morein wrote:
>> >> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>> >>
>> [snip]
>> > Perhaps a little spiritual guidance is needed in your life. Or maybe
>> > just some spirits.
>> >
>> I'm sorry, Scott, but I don't drink.
>
> Gee... how could I tell?
>
>> I'm at the local Starbucks, having my 2nd pumpkin spice latte vente.
>
> Great, a latte drinker... I'm sure that takes you out of
> consideration for Marges stalker position she is seeking to fill.
>
> ScottW
>

Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and having a
shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)

I guess you're out.


Cheers,

Margaret

[George M. Middius]

Bwian lied:

> BTW I am as far away from Cairns as you are from Alaska.

Server Used: [ whois.apnic.net ]

210.84.13.98 = [ 210-84-13-98.dyn.iinet.net.au ]
inetnum: 210.84.0.0 - 210.84.63.255
netname: IINET-AU
descr: iiNet Limited
descr: Level 6 263 Adelaide Terrace
descr: Perth
country: AU

[.]

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:06:22 -0500, George M. Middius <cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote:

>
>
>Bwian lied:
>
>> BTW I am as far away from Cairns as you are from Alaska.
>
>Server Used: [ whois.apnic.net ]
>
>210.84.13.98 = [ 210-84-13-98.dyn.iinet.net.au ]
> inetnum: 210.84.0.0 - 210.84.63.255
> netname: IINET-AU
> descr: iiNet Limited
> descr: Level 6 263 Adelaide Terrace
> descr: Perth
> country: AU
>

well Perth to Cairns is about the same as Seattle to Miami.

which is a friggin long way.

But of course many Americans have no idea of world geography.

[Clyde Slick]

<.> wrote in message ...
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:58:11 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>><.> wrote in message ...
>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:29:26 GMT, (paul packer)
>>
>>Brian is going for shorter sockpuppets.
>>
>
> Only a madman could accuse a full stop of being Brian.
>
> BTW I am as far away from Cairns as you are from Alaska.
>
> but don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.

Triangulation puts that right in the Ozarks.

[Clyde Slick]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> <.> wrote in message ...
>> On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:58:11 -0500, "Robert Morein"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><.> wrote in message ...
>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:29:26 GMT, (paul packer)
>>>
>>>Brian is going for shorter sockpuppets.
>>>
>>
>> Only a madman could accuse a full stop of being Brian.
>>
>> BTW I am as far away from Cairns as you are from Alaska.
>>
>> but don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.
>
> Triangulation puts that right in the Ozarks.
>

OOPS!!!
That would be The Great Dividing Range.

[surf]

"Margaret von B." > wrote...
>
> Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and having a
> shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
>
> I guess you're out.


Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?

[surf]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote ...
>
> Triangulation puts that right in the Ozarks.


LOL

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>>
>>Robert Morein wrote:
>>> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>>>
>>> Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>>>
>>> You are loved more than you know.
>>
>>
>> Lets take a poll on the stupidity of Robert's poll. If Robert's
>>poll wasn't the stupidest display ever brought to the RAO, what was?
>
> Etc... etc...
>
> The suggestion was silly, but I think Robert knew that; as I've said
> elsewhere I think he was just sounding the group. However, can you say
> absolutely that the motive was not altruistic? Robert's a thinker,

A thinker? When did you start hallucinating?

a
> compliment that can't be extended to all who post here.

Especially not to Robert.

He's obviously
> observed in Arny's posts, as have others before him, a disturbing lack
> of self-awareness and empathy for others, the kind of intense
> ego-centricity typical of what is called "psychiatric problems".

Something Robert appears to have lots of.

But
> hey, these problems are just intensifications of what we all suffer
> from; IOW, it's just a matter of degree. Maybe that's what bothers us
> about them: that we see the same thing in ourselves.
>
Robert can't even see that he's an idiot and an internet version of stalker.
He could be related to McCarty at least in spirit.

> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.

I say Robert is a giant putz.

[George M. Middius]

surf said:

> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and having a
> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)

> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?

Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown places.

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> surf said:
>
>> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and having
>> > a
>> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
>
>> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
>
> Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown places.
>
Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is this
image conjured from the imagination?

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> >> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
> >
> > Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown places.
> >
> Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is this
> image conjured from the imagination?

This is a question for Sackman.

[ScottW]

Robert Morein wrote:
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
> in message ...
> >
> >
> > surf said:
> >
> >> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and having
> >> > a
> >> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
> >
> >> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
> >
> > Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown places.
> >
> Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is this
> image conjured from the imagination?

or delusions of jealousy? Unfortunately I made the cut for Marge's
stalker prerequisites and the rest is just another of George's
inadequate fantasies. He had a thing for Greg when he was playing
tough guy who liked to throw his bulk around. That faded when Greg
revealed himself to be a coward in the face of discrimination at his
gym and Gregipus was born.

ScottW

[Clyde Slick]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote in message ...
>>
>>
>> surf said:
>>
>>> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and
>>> > having a
>>> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
>>
>>> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
>>
>> Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown places.
>>
> Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is this
> image conjured from the imagination?
>

"At least" he has a job.
Do you want us to start dumping on you
for what a psychopathic loser you are?

[Margaret von B.]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>> wrote in message ...
>>>
>>>
>>> surf said:
>>>
>>>> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and
>>>> > having a
>>>> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
>>>
>>>> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
>>>
>>> Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown
>>> places.
>>>
>> Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is this
>> image conjured from the imagination?
>>
>
> "At least" he has a job.
> Do you want us to start dumping on you
> for what a psychopathic loser you are?
>

Hi Clyde!

Your response is very revealing. :-)

Cheers,

Margaret


PS. Sounds like Scott could be the new Pillsbury Dough Boy

[Clyde Slick]

"Margaret von B." > wrote in message
...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>>> wrote in message ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> surf said:
>>>>
>>>>> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and
>>>>> > having a
>>>>> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
>>>>
>>>>> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
>>>>
>>>> Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown
>>>> places.
>>>>
>>> Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is this
>>> image conjured from the imagination?
>>>
>>
>> "At least" he has a job.
>> Do you want us to start dumping on you
>> for what a psychopathic loser you are?
>>
>
> Hi Clyde!
>
> Your response is very revealing. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Margaret
>
>
> PS. Sounds like Scott could be the new Pillsbury Dough Boy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Clyde Slick]

"Margaret von B." > wrote in message
...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>>> wrote in message ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> surf said:
>>>>
>>>>> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and
>>>>> > having a
>>>>> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
>>>>
>>>>> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
>>>>
>>>> Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown
>>>> places.
>>>>
>>> Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is this
>>> image conjured from the imagination?
>>>
>>
>> "At least" he has a job.
>> Do you want us to start dumping on you
>> for what a psychopathic loser you are?
>>
>
> Hi Clyde!
>
> Your response is very revealing. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Margaret
>
>
> PS. Sounds like Scott could be the new Pillsbury Dough Boy
>

You mistook my deflection as affirmation.

[Robert Morein]

"Margaret von B." > wrote in message
...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>>> wrote in message ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> surf said:
>>>>
>>>>> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and
>>>>> > having a
>>>>> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
>>>>
>>>>> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
>>>>
>>>> Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown
>>>> places.
>>>>
>>> Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is this
>>> image conjured from the imagination?
>>>
>>
>> "At least" he has a job.
>> Do you want us to start dumping on you
>> for what a psychopathic loser you are?
>>
>
> Hi Clyde!
>
> Your response is very revealing. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Margaret
>
>
> PS. Sounds like Scott could be the new Pillsbury Dough Boy
>
Did I insult Art's lover, or something? He quite took umbrage over an rao
character.

"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Margaret von B. wrote:
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>> >
>> > Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>> >
>> > You are loved more than you know.
>>
>> Hi Rob!
>>
>> How on earth did you come up with that conclusion? Despite my comments to
>> you, Arnii is, has always been and will always be a bitter, vile,
>> worthless
>> piece of ****. But as long as he stays off my property and doesn't stalk
>> me,
>
> Who else thinks Margaret wouldn't be thrilled to be stalked at this
> stage of
> her life?..... oh well, the Danes are probably too tired for serious
> guard duty anyway.
>
> ScottW
>
I think a better question woould be: Who thinks Margaret is a real person,
let alone a female?

Probably either George or Morein.

"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>> oups.com
>>
>> > Who else thinks Margaret wouldn't be thrilled to be
>> > stalked at this stage of her life?.....
>>
>> ..not to mention this sex of her life...
>
> oh brother, Arny got into the sacrament again ... Arny needs a latte
> and Robert needs a drink... and Maggie... well somebody should consider
> calling PETA.
>
> ScottW
>
People Eating Tasty Animals?

[paul packer]

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 06:56:34 GMT, > wrote:

>
>"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
>> On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Robert Morein wrote:
>>>> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>>>>
>>>> Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>>>>
>>>> You are loved more than you know.
>>>
>>>
>>> Lets take a poll on the stupidity of Robert's poll. If Robert's
>>>poll wasn't the stupidest display ever brought to the RAO, what was?
>>
>> Etc... etc...
>>
>> The suggestion was silly, but I think Robert knew that; as I've said
>> elsewhere I think he was just sounding the group. However, can you say
>> absolutely that the motive was not altruistic? Robert's a thinker,
>
>A thinker? When did you start hallucinating?
>
> a
>> compliment that can't be extended to all who post here.
>
>Especially not to Robert.
>
>He's obviously
>> observed in Arny's posts, as have others before him, a disturbing lack
>> of self-awareness and empathy for others, the kind of intense
>> ego-centricity typical of what is called "psychiatric problems".
>
>Something Robert appears to have lots of.
>
>But
>> hey, these problems are just intensifications of what we all suffer
>> from; IOW, it's just a matter of degree. Maybe that's what bothers us
>> about them: that we see the same thing in ourselves.
>>
>Robert can't even see that he's an idiot and an internet version of stalker.
>He could be related to McCarty at least in spirit.
>
>> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
>> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.
>
>I say Robert is a giant putz.

Hmmm...maybe you're Brian. :-)

[paul packer]

On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 20:12:46 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>
>"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>
>> paul packer wrote:
>>> On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>>
>[snip].
>>>
>>> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
>>> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.
>>
>> The suggestion was silly... Robert knew it was silly.... but still
>> comes off as being constructive..... Careful... with that kind of
>> logic Robert will want to talk with your pastor next.
>>
>> ScottW
>>
>I would only convey compliments.


Oooooooh...

(blush)

[paul packer]

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:37:01 +1100, . wrote:

>On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:29:26 GMT, (paul packer)
>wrote:
>
>>On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Robert Morein wrote:
>>>> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>>>>
>>>> Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>>>>
>>>> You are loved more than you know.
>>>
>>>
>>> Lets take a poll on the stupidity of Robert's poll. If Robert's
>>>poll wasn't the stupidest display ever brought to the RAO, what was?
>>
>>Etc... etc...
>>
>>The suggestion was silly, but I think Robert knew that; as I've said
>>elsewhere I think he was just sounding the group. However, can you say
>>absolutely that the motive was not altruistic? Robert's a thinker, a
>>compliment that can't be extended to all who post here. He's obviously
>>observed in Arny's posts, as have others before him, a disturbing lack
>>of self-awareness and empathy for others, the kind of intense
>>ego-centricity typical of what is called "psychiatric problems". But
>>hey, these problems are just intensifications of what we all suffer
>>from; IOW, it's just a matter of degree. Maybe that's what bothers us
>>about them: that we see the same thing in ourselves.
>>
>> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
>>than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.
>
>Robert is a friggin idiot who knows nothing about anything outside his
>bedroom door.

Please get a longer name. Thank you.

[paul packer]

On 4 Dec 2005 16:45:42 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:


>> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
>> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.
>
> The suggestion was silly... Robert knew it was silly.... but still
>comes off as being constructive..... Careful... with that kind of
>logic Robert will want to talk with your pastor next.

Because it was an attempt to stimulate constructive debate rather than
a purely hostile knee-jerk reaction. C'mon, Scott, I didn't really
have to explain that.

[Clyde Slick]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Margaret von B." > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>>>> wrote in message ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> surf said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and
>>>>>> > having a
>>>>>> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
>>>>>
>>>>> Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown
>>>>> places.
>>>>>
>>>> Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is this
>>>> image conjured from the imagination?
>>>>
>>>
>>> "At least" he has a job.
>>> Do you want us to start dumping on you
>>> for what a psychopathic loser you are?
>>>
>>
>> Hi Clyde!
>>
>> Your response is very revealing. :-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Margaret
>>
>>
>> PS. Sounds like Scott could be the new Pillsbury Dough Boy
>>
> Did I insult Art's lover, or something? He quite took umbrage over an rao
> character.
>

**** You

[ScottW]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>
> >> PS. Sounds like Scott could be the new Pillsbury Dough Boy
> >>
> > Did I insult Art's lover, or something? He quite took umbrage over an rao
> > character.
> >
>
> **** You

Bob's just jealous.. no intellect, no character, and no friends.
All he has is his fantasies and his latte but it's his life and he's
welcome to it.

But Marges animal magnetism is a bit disconcerting.

ScottW

[Margaret von B.]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Margaret von B." > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>>>>> wrote in message ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> surf said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Scott, it may come to you as a s urprise but being over 5'5" and
>>>>>>> > having a
>>>>>>> > shoe size larger than 7 goes a long way. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does being over 300 lbs count for anything?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Definitely. Scottie is a terror at those all-you-can-eat chowdown
>>>>>> places.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Since I've never seen Scott, is he a minature "Fat *******", or is
>>>>> this image conjured from the imagination?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "At least" he has a job.
>>>> Do you want us to start dumping on you
>>>> for what a psychopathic loser you are?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Clyde!
>>>
>>> Your response is very revealing. :-)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Margaret
>>>
>>>
>>> PS. Sounds like Scott could be the new Pillsbury Dough Boy
>>>
>> Did I insult Art's lover, or something? He quite took umbrage over an rao
>> character.
>>
>
> **** You
>

Now now Clyde. I'm sure Scotty loves to earn his pearl necklace. Did you try
balancing your beer on his head while he was performing? :-)

Cheers,

Margaret

[Lionel]

Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :

>> Did I insult Art's lover, or something? He quite took umbrage over an rao
>> character.
>>
>
> **** You


LOL !
Thank you for this honest answer Arthur.



--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

[Lionel]

ScottW wrote :

> Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote:

>> **** You
>
> Bob's just jealous..


Of what ? 150 lbs of superfluous bacon ? ;-)

Is it the new standard of elegance in USA ? Good for you, you will not be
obliged to emigrate to Japan



--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 06:56:34 GMT, > wrote:
>
>>
>>"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
>>> On 4 Dec 2005 14:16:55 -0800, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Robert Morein wrote:
>>>>> The concensus seems unanimously against this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Arny, I have not received a single email urging that I do this.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are loved more than you know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lets take a poll on the stupidity of Robert's poll. If Robert's
>>>>poll wasn't the stupidest display ever brought to the RAO, what was?
>>>
>>> Etc... etc...
>>>
>>> The suggestion was silly, but I think Robert knew that; as I've said
>>> elsewhere I think he was just sounding the group. However, can you say
>>> absolutely that the motive was not altruistic? Robert's a thinker,
>>
>>A thinker? When did you start hallucinating?
>>
>> a
>>> compliment that can't be extended to all who post here.
>>
>>Especially not to Robert.
>>
>>He's obviously
>>> observed in Arny's posts, as have others before him, a disturbing lack
>>> of self-awareness and empathy for others, the kind of intense
>>> ego-centricity typical of what is called "psychiatric problems".
>>
>>Something Robert appears to have lots of.
>>
>>But
>>> hey, these problems are just intensifications of what we all suffer
>>> from; IOW, it's just a matter of degree. Maybe that's what bothers us
>>> about them: that we see the same thing in ourselves.
>>>
>>Robert can't even see that he's an idiot and an internet version of
>>stalker.
>>He could be related to McCarty at least in spirit.
>>
>>> I say kudos to Robert for showing some constructive concern rather
>>> than just trying to step on Arnie all the time.
>>
>>I say Robert is a giant putz.
>
> Hmmm...maybe you're Brian. :-)

I'm not Brian even if Moron used to think so.

Brian and Michael Conzo have both sent me e-mail that I chose to ignore.

[paul packer]

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:44:23 GMT, > wrote:


>>>I say Robert is a giant putz.
>>
>> Hmmm...maybe you're Brian. :-)
>
>I'm not Brian even if Moron used to think so.
>
>Brian and Michael Conzo have both sent me e-mail that I chose to ignore.

I see you have the same razor-sharp sense of humour as Arnie.

[paul packer]

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:54:24 GMT, "Margaret von B."
> wrote:


>>> Did I insult Art's lover, or something? He quite took umbrage over an rao
>>> character.
>>>
>>
>> **** You
>>
>
>Now now Clyde. I'm sure Scotty loves to earn his pearl necklace. Did you try
>balancing your beer on his head while he was performing? :-)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Margaret

Perhaps you'd like to explain all this for the rest of us.

[Margaret von B.]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:54:24 GMT, "Margaret von B."
> > wrote:
>
>
>>>> Did I insult Art's lover, or something? He quite took umbrage over an
>>>> rao
>>>> character.
>>>>
>>>
>>> **** You
>>>
>>
>>Now now Clyde. I'm sure Scotty loves to earn his pearl necklace. Did you
>>try
>>balancing your beer on his head while he was performing? :-)
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Margaret
>
> Perhaps you'd like to explain all this for the rest of us.
>

Ask Clyde. His explanations are simple and effective. :-)

Cheers,

Margaret

[Clyde Slick]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:44:23 GMT, > wrote:
>
>
>>>>I say Robert is a giant putz.
>>>
>>> Hmmm...maybe you're Brian. :-)
>>
>>I'm not Brian even if Moron used to think so.
>>
>>Brian and Michael Conzo have both sent me e-mail that I chose to ignore.
>
> I see you have the same razor-sharp sense of humour as Arnie.

"at least" Mikey ignored it.

[Clyde Slick]

"Margaret von B." > wrote in message
...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:54:24 GMT, "Margaret von B."
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>> Did I insult Art's lover, or something? He quite took umbrage over an
>>>>> rao
>>>>> character.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **** You
>>>>
>>>
>>>Now now Clyde. I'm sure Scotty loves to earn his pearl necklace. Did you
>>>try
>>>balancing your beer on his head while he was performing? :-)
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>Margaret
>>
>> Perhaps you'd like to explain all this for the rest of us.
>>
>
> Ask Clyde. His explanations are simple and effective. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Margaret
>
>

Done!

[George M. Middius]

paul packer said:

> >> Hmmm...maybe you're Brian. :-)

> >I'm not Brian even if Moron used to think so.

> I see you have the same razor-sharp sense of humour as Arnie.

Humor is irrelevant. Facts are all that is necessary. You will be
assimilated.