Question for Greg Singh

[George M. Middius]

Greg, which one of your moral guideposts says it's OK for you to
use the word "******"?

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Greg, which one of your moral guideposts says it's OK for you to
> use the word "******"?


I hate to answer a question with a question, George, but I don't know
why you would get hung up on words like "******" and "fag" when you have
a penchant for making "jokes" about a guy ****ing his dead kid in the
ass. From where I'm sitting you're just a basket case. Sorry.

[George M. Middius]

Racist Gregipus said:

> > Greg, which one of your moral guideposts says it's OK for you to
> > use the word "******"?

> I hate to answer a question with a question, George

On the contrary, you love doing just that. Or maybe there's
another reason why you do it 99 times out of a hundred....

> why you would get hung up on words like "******" and "fag" when you have
> a penchant for making "jokes" about a guy ****ing his dead kid in the
> ass.

It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.

> From where I'm sitting you're just a basket case. Sorry.

I suppose you think that troubles me.

Now let's get back to the question at hand, you dirty little
closet case. Why is it OK for you to use the word "******"?

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> George M. Middius wrote:
> >
> > Greg, which one of your moral guideposts says it's OK for you to
> > use the word "******"?
>
>
> I hate to answer a question with a question, George, but I don't know
> why you would get hung up on words like "******" and "fag" when you have
> a penchant for making "jokes" about a guy ****ing his dead kid in the
> ass. From where I'm sitting you're just a basket case. Sorry.
>
>
The problem with where you're sitting is you can't see yourself.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Racist Gregipus said:
>
>
>>>Greg, which one of your moral guideposts says it's OK for you to
>>>use the word "******"?
>>
>
>
>>I hate to answer a question with a question, George
>
>
> On the contrary, you love doing just that. Or maybe there's
> another reason why you do it 99 times out of a hundred....
>
>
>>why you would get hung up on words like "******" and "fag" when you have
>>a penchant for making "jokes" about a guy ****ing his dead kid in the
>>ass.
>
>
> It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
> can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.


Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.

[George M. Middius]

Goofy Gregipus, Chicago's racist compulsive liar, lied:

> > It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
> > can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.

> Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.

I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
"explanation".

Maybe I should spell out my meaning so it can be understood even by
the intellectual equivalent of a hippopotamus in a mud pool.

In response to your asinine question to Kroo**** about his fake
religiosity, I asked you to explain your racism.

Your answer was to reinforce your credentials as a racist and a bigot.
You also took the opportunity to lie about your behavior on RAO. You
then referred to an episode of several years ago that you suddenly
feel is offensive or some such.

I then dismissed your idiotic "question" by mocking your hypocrisy,
your total lack of self-awareness, and your ludicrous posturing on
behalf of your arbitrary and unsupported standards of fake morality.

Then, out of the blue, you suddenly pretended this is a serious
exchange, as if you truly and sincerely need me to explain why I feel
it's OK to malign Kroo****'s character while also upbraiding you for
spewing your racist and homophobic hatreds. It almost seems that
you've somehow missed the entire Krooger issue. Are you actually
unaware of all the lewd sexual comments Mr. **** has directed at many
RAO contributors, past and present? Are you actually unaware that
everything Krooger receives, he brings on himself? Are you overcome by
pathos because of your kinship with Krazy Krooger?

That's a lot of questions for you to answer with your own questions,
but what the heck -- here's another. Do you think it's productive for
a single individual to be resented, seen as an irritant, or outright
hated on every newsgroup in which he mother****ing participates?

Take as much time as you need, etc. No need to apologize, or blame
others for your own inability to follow the conversation. Random
non-answers and evasions fully expected. Suicide still anticipated,
preferably grisly, albeit with a lesser degree of eagerness than
previously.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Goofy Gregipus, Chicago's racist compulsive liar, lied:
>
>
>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.
>>
>
>
>>Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.
>
>
> I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
> "explanation".
>
> Maybe I should spell out my meaning so it can be understood even by
> the intellectual equivalent of a hippopotamus in a mud pool.
>
> In response to your asinine question to Kroo**** about his fake
> religiosity, I asked you to explain your racism.
>
> Your answer was to reinforce your credentials as a racist and a bigot.


You know, George, there's one thing I don't understand about the world:
why is it that kids of three or four years old have more of an
understanding about name calling than adults do? 'Sticks and stones may
break my bones,' etc. You know that one, right? And yet you somehow
are unable to take this little bit of child's philosophy to heart, and
act even less mature. Don't you have any explanation for your behavior?

[George M. Middius]

Ever rationalizing his demented behavior, Gay Gregipus flips through
this month's "Studs On Parade".

> >>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
> >>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.

> >>Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.

> > I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
> > "explanation".

No follow-up, prissy one?

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
>
> Ever rationalizing his demented behavior, Gay Gregipus flips through
> this month's "Studs On Parade".
>
>
>>>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
>>>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.
>>>>
>
>>>>Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.
>>>
>
>>>I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
>>>"explanation".
>>
>
> No follow-up, prissy one?


Oh, I've got a follow up--but you'll use the K-Y aspect of your
personality to slink away, as usual.

[George M. Middius]

The Gay Coward from Chicago weasels out of defending his language
abuses.

> > Ever rationalizing his demented behavior, Gay Gregipus flips through
> > this month's "Studs On Parade".

So I was right. Who knew?

> >>>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
> >>>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.

> >>>>Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.

> >>>I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
> >>>"explanation".

> > No follow-up, prissy one?

> Oh, I've got a follow up--but you'll use the K-Y aspect of your
> personality to slink away, as usual.

How can I "slink away" when I'm the one asking the questions?

As usual, you have no testicular apparatus.

[trotsky]

trotsky wrote:
>
>
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>>
>> Goofy Gregipus, Chicago's racist compulsive liar, lied:
>>
>>
>>>> It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
>>>> can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
>> "explanation".
>> Maybe I should spell out my meaning so it can be understood even by
>> the intellectual equivalent of a hippopotamus in a mud pool.
>> In response to your asinine question to Kroo**** about his fake
>> religiosity, I asked you to explain your racism.
>>
>> Your answer was to reinforce your credentials as a racist and a bigot.
>
>
>
> You know, George, there's one thing I don't understand about the world:
> why is it that kids of three or four years old have more of an
> understanding about name calling than adults do? 'Sticks and stones may
> break my bones,' etc. You know that one, right? And yet you somehow
> are unable to take this little bit of child's philosophy to heart, and
> act even less mature. Don't you have any explanation for your behavior?
>

[George M. Middius]

The Gay Coward from Chicago weasels out of defending his language
abuses.

> > Ever rationalizing his demented behavior, Gay Gregipus flips through
> > this month's "Studs On Parade".

So I was right. Who knew?

> >>>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
> >>>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.

> >>>>Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.

> >>>I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
> >>>"explanation".

> > No follow-up, prissy one?

> Oh, I've got a follow up--but you'll use the K-Y aspect of your
> personality to slink away, as usual.

How can I "slink away" when I'm the one asking the questions?

As usual, you have no testicular apparatus.

[George M. Middius]

The Gay Coward from Chicago weasels out of defending his language
abuses.

> > Ever rationalizing his demented behavior, Gay Gregipus flips through
> > this month's "Studs On Parade".

So I was right. Who knew?

> >>>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
> >>>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.

> >>>>Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.

> >>>I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
> >>>"explanation".

> > No follow-up, prissy one?

> Oh, I've got a follow up--but you'll use the K-Y aspect of your
> personality to slink away, as usual.

How can I "slink away" when I'm the one asking the questions?

As usual, you have no testicular apparatus.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
>
>
> The Gay Coward from Chicago weasels out of defending his language
> abuses.
>
>
>>>Ever rationalizing his demented behavior, Gay Gregipus flips through
>>>this month's "Studs On Parade".
>
>
> So I was right. Who knew?
>
>
>>>>>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
>>>>>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.
>
>
>>>>>>Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.
>
>
>>>>>I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
>>>>>"explanation".
>
>
>>>No follow-up, prissy one?
>
>
>
>>Oh, I've got a follow up--but you'll use the K-Y aspect of your
>>personality to slink away, as usual.
>
>
> How can I "slink away" when I'm the one asking the questions?
>
> As usual, you have no testicular apparatus.


You first: what did you think of dave's attempt at reviewing my
speakers? Be as specific as possible, please.

[George M. Middius]

The Gay Coward from Chicago weasels out of defending his language
abuses.

> >>>Ever rationalizing his demented behavior, Gay Gregipus flips through
> >>>this month's "Studs On Parade".

> > So I was right. Who knew?

Inability to respond noted.


> >>>>>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
> >>>>>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.

> >>>>>>Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.

> >>>>>I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
> >>>>>"explanation".

> >>>No follow-up, prissy one?

Fraidy-catness observed.


> >>Oh, I've got a follow up--but you'll use the K-Y aspect of your
> >>personality to slink away, as usual.

> > How can I "slink away" when I'm the one asking the questions?

> > As usual, you have no testicular apparatus.

> You first: what did you think of dave's attempt at reviewing my
> speakers?

Sorry, but my unanswered questions were posed 2 days before you came
up with your latest slimy evasion. That means you go first. Be as
specific as possible without shooting yourself in the dick with a
fork, etc.

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message


> Sorry, but my unanswered questions were posed 2 days before you came
> up with your latest slimy evasion. That means you go first. Be as
> specific as possible without shooting yourself in the dick with a
> fork, etc.

Don't bother Greg. Middius always sloughs this sort of thing when it applies
to him.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> The Gay Coward from Chicago weasels out of defending his language
> abuses.
>
>
>>>>>Ever rationalizing his demented behavior, Gay Gregipus flips through
>>>>>this month's "Studs On Parade".
>>>>
>
>>>So I was right. Who knew?
>>
>
> Inability to respond noted.
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
>>>>>>>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.
>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>Not good enough. That's a child's explanation.
>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>I'm at a loss to guess how you can call a bit of mockery an
>>>>>>>"explanation".
>>>>>>
>
>>>>>No follow-up, prissy one?
>>>>
>
> Fraidy-catness observed.
>
>
>
>>>>Oh, I've got a follow up--but you'll use the K-Y aspect of your
>>>>personality to slink away, as usual.
>>>
>
>>>How can I "slink away" when I'm the one asking the questions?
>>
>
>>>As usual, you have no testicular apparatus.
>>
>
>
>>You first: what did you think of dave's attempt at reviewing my
>>speakers?
>
>
> Sorry, but my unanswered questions were posed 2 days before you came
> up with your latest slimy evasion.


Agenda duly noted. Somehow I think if the comments were favorable you'd
have no problem posting them.

[trotsky]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>>Sorry, but my unanswered questions were posed 2 days before you came
>>up with your latest slimy evasion. That means you go first. Be as
>>specific as possible without shooting yourself in the dick with a
>>fork, etc.
>
>
> Don't bother Greg. Middius always sloughs this sort of thing when it applies
> to him.


My experience is that in the old days Middius would be able to respond
to direct questions without getting lost in the catacombs of his mind.
Now, though, every time I post he's either doing damage control, spin
doctoring, or both.

[George M. Middius]

The Gay Coward from Chicago continues to weasel out of defending his
language abuses.

> >>>>>>>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
> >>>>>>>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.

> > Sorry, but my unanswered questions were posed 2 days before you came
> > up with your latest slimy evasion.

> Agenda duly noted.

What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> The Gay Coward from Chicago continues to weasel out of defending his
> language abuses.
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>It's pathetic that at this stage in your so-called "life", you
>>>>>>>>>>>can't tell the difference between "a guy" and Arnii Krooger.
>>>>>>>>>>
>
>>>Sorry, but my unanswered questions were posed 2 days before you came
>>>up with your latest slimy evasion.
>>
>
>
>>Agenda duly noted.
>
>
> What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?


Maybe it's a gay one: it prevents you from providing a "straight" answer
when asked.

[George M. Middius]

The Gay Coward from Chicago continues to weasel out of defending his
language abuses.

> >>>Sorry, but my unanswered questions were posed 2 days before you came
> >>>up with your latest slimy evasion.

> >>Agenda duly noted.

> > What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?

> Maybe it's a gay one: it prevents you from providing a "straight" answer
> when asked.

So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
you be any gayer, fembot?

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> The Gay Coward from Chicago continues to weasel out of defending his
> language abuses.
>
>
>>>>>Sorry, but my unanswered questions were posed 2 days before you came
>>>>>up with your latest slimy evasion.
>>>>
>
>>>>Agenda duly noted.
>>>
>
>>>What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?
>>
>
>
>>Maybe it's a gay one: it prevents you from providing a "straight" answer
>>when asked.
>
>
> So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
> you be any gayer, fembot?


Why should I have to identify it? You tell me why you're afraid to
answer the question about dave's reviewing attempt.

[George M. Middius]

Gregipus the Liar admits to his gayness.


> >>>>Agenda duly noted.

> >>>What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?

> >>Maybe it's a gay one: it prevents you from providing a "straight" answer
> >>when asked.

> > So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
> > you be any gayer, fembot?

> Why should I have to identify it?

I assume Krooger is grateful to have another loony in his bin.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...

> Don't bother Greg.
>

I rarely bother Greg.

LOL!




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Gregipus the Liar admits to his gayness.
>
>
>
>>>>>>Agenda duly noted.
>>>>>
>
>>>>>What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?
>>>>
>
>>>>Maybe it's a gay one: it prevents you from providing a "straight" answer
>>>>when asked.
>>>
>
>>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
>>>you be any gayer, fembot?
>>
>
>
>>Why should I have to identify it?
>
>
> I assume Krooger is grateful to have another loony in his bin.


Which Star Trek episode is that a reference to?

[George M. Middius]

Gregipus the Imbecile keeps up a gay front.

> >>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
> >>>you be any gayer, fembot?

> >>Why should I have to identify it?

> > I assume Krooger is grateful to have another loony in his bin.

> Which Star Trek episode is that a reference to?

Run out of Kleenex again, Your Gayness?

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Gregipus the Liar admits to his gayness.
>
>
> > >>>>Agenda duly noted.
>
> > >>>What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?
>
> > >>Maybe it's a gay one: it prevents you from providing a "straight"
answer
> > >>when asked.
>
> > > So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
> > > you be any gayer, fembot?
>
> > Why should I have to identify it?
>
> I assume Krooger is grateful to have another loony in his bin.

Did Greg ever explain why it is ok for him to use the word
******? Or is the gradeschool sticks and stones bs supposed
to suffice?

ScottW

[ScottW]

"Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message
...
>
> "trotsky" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >
> > George M. Middius wrote:
> > >
> > > Greg, which one of your moral guideposts says it's OK for you to
> > > use the word "******"?
> >
> >
> > I hate to answer a question with a question, George, but I don't know
> > why you would get hung up on words like "******" and "fag" when you
have
> > a penchant for making "jokes" about a guy ****ing his dead kid in the
> > ass. From where I'm sitting you're just a basket case. Sorry.
> >
> >
> The problem with where you're sitting is you can't see yourself.

Yup. Using George's sad behavior to excuse his own racist
bigotry is the act of a coward.

ScottW

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Gregipus the Imbecile keeps up a gay front.
>
>
>>>>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
>>>>>you be any gayer, fembot?
>>>>
>
>>>>Why should I have to identify it?
>>>
>
>>>I assume Krooger is grateful to have another loony in his bin.
>>
>
>
>>Which Star Trek episode is that a reference to?
>
>
> Run out of Kleenex again, Your Gayness?


What did you say the reason was why you couldn't comment on dave's
reviewing attempt?

[trotsky]

ScottW wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>>Gregipus the Liar admits to his gayness.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>Agenda duly noted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe it's a gay one: it prevents you from providing a "straight"
>>>>
> answer
>
>>>>>when asked.
>>>>
>>>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
>>>>you be any gayer, fembot?
>>>
>>>Why should I have to identify it?
>>
>>I assume Krooger is grateful to have another loony in his bin.
>
>
> Did Greg ever explain why it is ok for him to use the word
> ******? Or is the gradeschool sticks and stones bs supposed
> to suffice?


Georgie Porgie certainly didn't have an answer for that one.

[dave weil]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:18:52 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>
>George M. Middius wrote:
>>
>> Gregipus the Imbecile keeps up a gay front.
>>
>>
>>>>>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
>>>>>>you be any gayer, fembot?
>>>>>
>>
>>>>>Why should I have to identify it?
>>>>
>>
>>>>I assume Krooger is grateful to have another loony in his bin.
>>>
>>
>>
>>>Which Star Trek episode is that a reference to?
>>
>>
>> Run out of Kleenex again, Your Gayness?
>
>
>What did you say the reason was why you couldn't comment on dave's
>reviewing attempt?

I'm sure the last words he would use would be terse and concise.

[ScottW]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> ScottW wrote:
> > "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>
> >>Gregipus the Liar admits to his gayness.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>Agenda duly noted.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Maybe it's a gay one: it prevents you from providing a "straight"
> >>>>
> > answer
> >
> >>>>>when asked.
> >>>>
> >>>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
> >>>>you be any gayer, fembot?
> >>>
> >>>Why should I have to identify it?
> >>
> >>I assume Krooger is grateful to have another loony in his bin.
> >
> >
> > Did Greg ever explain why it is ok for him to use the word
> > ******? Or is the gradeschool sticks and stones bs supposed
> > to suffice?
>
>
> Georgie Porgie certainly didn't have an answer for that one.

You have yet to answer the original question.
Matter of fact, I don't recall you actually addressing
a question in recent memory.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Fay mincing Gayipus yearns for some serious cock time.

> >>>>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
> >>>>>you be any gayer, fembot?

> What did you say the reason was why you couldn't comment on dave's
> reviewing attempt?

I think I get it now -- you're into S&M, right? You probably made
Jocasta use a strap-on when she whaled on you. "Ooh, mama -- you da
man! Harder, you tigress! Ouch!" Too bad you didn't get it on tape.

[trotsky]

ScottW wrote:
> "trotsky" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>>ScottW wrote:
>>
>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregipus the Liar admits to his gayness.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Agenda duly noted.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What "agenda" do you believe I'm following, O Faggy One?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Maybe it's a gay one: it prevents you from providing a "straight"
>>>>>>
>>>answer
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>when asked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
>>>>>>you be any gayer, fembot?
>>>>>
>>>>>Why should I have to identify it?
>>>>
>>>>I assume Krooger is grateful to have another loony in his bin.
>>>
>>>
>>> Did Greg ever explain why it is ok for him to use the word
>>> ******? Or is the gradeschool sticks and stones bs supposed
>>> to suffice?
>>
>>
>>Georgie Porgie certainly didn't have an answer for that one.
>
>
> You have yet to answer the original question.
> Matter of fact, I don't recall you actually addressing
> a question in recent memory.


Yeah, that explains why the majority of posts are about me.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Fay mincing Gayipus yearns for some serious cock time.
>
>
>>>>>>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
>>>>>>>you be any gayer, fembot?
>>>>>>
>
>
>>What did you say the reason was why you couldn't comment on dave's
>>reviewing attempt?
>
>
> I think I get it now -- you're into S&M, right? You probably made
> Jocasta use a strap-on when she whaled on you. "Ooh, mama -- you da
> man! Harder, you tigress! Ouch!" Too bad you didn't get it on tape.


So let me get this straight: not only are you too afraid to comment on
dave's reviewing attempt, but you're too afraid to even come up with a
valid explanation? Some tough guy you turned out to be.

[George M. Middius]

The wildly crazy Gay boy wondered:

> > Matter of fact, I don't recall you actually addressing
> > a question in recent memory.

> Yeah, that explains why the majority of posts are about me.

I admit we do seem to be guilty of talking to you (and about you) a
lot. But you are such a spectacle -- how can we be blamed?

[George M. Middius]

Fay mincing Gayipus yearns for some serious cock time.

> >>>>>>>So you "noted" my "agenda", but you're unable to identify it? Could
> >>>>>>>you be any gayer, fembot?

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> The wildly crazy Gay boy wondered:
>
>
>>> Matter of fact, I don't recall you actually addressing
>>> a question in recent memory.
>>
>
>
>>Yeah, that explains why the majority of posts are about me.
>
>
> I admit we do seem to be guilty of talking to you (and about you) a
> lot. But you are such a spectacle -- how can we be blamed?



How? Because your audio knowledge could fit in a thimble with room to
spare. Need I go on?

[George M. Middius]

It just gets kookier and kookier in Gregipus-Land. Would the little
brown queen's head get clearer if he finally had the chance to suck
a cock?

> > I admit we do seem to be guilty of talking to you (and about you) a
> > lot. But you are such a spectacle -- how can we be blamed?

> How? Because your audio knowledge could fit in a thimble with room to
> spare.

Maybe in your twisted little curry-soaked brain there's a connection
between most of the group having laughs at your expense and how much
"audio knowledge" you believe I have, but not in the real world.
So'rry.

> Need I go on?

Not unless you want to be understood.

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

> It just gets kookier and kookier in Gregipus-Land. Would the little
> brown queen's head get clearer if he finally had the chance to suck
> a cock?
>
>>> I admit we do seem to be guilty of talking to you (and about you) a
>>> lot. But you are such a spectacle -- how can we be blamed?
>
>> How? Because your audio knowledge could fit in a thimble with room
>> to spare.
>
> Maybe in your twisted little curry-soaked brain there's a connection
> between most of the group having laughs at your expense and how much
> "audio knowledge" you believe I have, but not in the real world.
> So'rry.


George, this statement implies that you have some idea of what "audio
knowledge" is. You've avoided demonstrating that for what 5 or 6 years. What
makes us think that you are qualified to judge Greg?

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> It just gets kookier and kookier in Gregipus-Land. Would the little
> brown queen's head get clearer if he finally had the chance to suck
> a cock?
>
>
>>>I admit we do seem to be guilty of talking to you (and about you) a
>>>lot. But you are such a spectacle -- how can we be blamed?
>>
>
>>How? Because your audio knowledge could fit in a thimble with room to
>>spare.
>
>
> Maybe in your twisted little curry-soaked brain there's a connection
> between most of the group having laughs at your expense


Now this is ironic. You're GAY, George. Gays are a laughingstock
across America. This is hardly my doing.

[George M. Middius]

Cowardly Gayipus minced:

> > It just gets kookier and kookier in Gregipus-Land. Would the little
> > brown queen's head get clearer if he finally had the chance to suck
> > a cock?

> Gays are a laughingstock across America.

That's no reason to stay in the closet, Fag-Boy. You're already a
laughingstock, so there's nothing to lose.