Krueger's pastor?

[Robert Morein]

Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
I'd like to throw him a call.

[Lionel]

Robert Morein a écrit :
> Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
> I'd like to throw him a call.


You'd better go here and have some good time :
http://www.pandora.com/
;-)



--
Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?

Dave Weil - Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 -0500

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
> I'd like to throw him a call.

http://www.gpbc.org/


People have threatened to rat out the Kroo to his pastor before, but nobody
has ever followed through.

[Goofball_star_dot_etal]

On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:00:04 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
>I'd like to throw him a call.
>
What you really need is a shrink not a pastor, pal.

[Lionel]

George M. Middius a écrit :
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
>
>>Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
>>I'd like to throw him a call.
>
>
> http://www.gpbc.org/
>
>
> People have threatened to rat out the Kroo to his pastor before, but nobody
> has ever followed through.


This sounds like a challenge to Bob, no ?


--
Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?

Dave Weil - Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 -0500

[Sylvan Morein]

In article ,
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" > wrote:

> On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:00:04 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
>> I'd like to throw him a call.
>>
> What you really need is a shrink not a pastor, pal.

He's had a shrink, several in fact. Since he refuses to take his medication
and routinely declares himself "cured", there is little we can do. Bob sits
in his room and telephones around the world, claiming to have information
about a wide variety of people. He thinks that because people are polite and
listen to his rantings that they actually believe him - but they put the
phone down and either shake their head in pity or roar in peals of laughter.
He senses that everyone is laughing at him but without strong psychotropic
medication his grasp of reality is tenuous at best. Mr. Krueger's pastor, if
called, will likely react with pity and compassion, because clearly no
rational human would take a call from a stranger seriously - a pastor that
knows and respects Krueger would easily peg Bob's rantings of that coming
from a lunatic.

Sad, really. Sadder that he's 53 years old and never been employed, or
contributed anything of value to society. Of this fact I am deeply ashamed.

Sylvan Morein, DDS

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net> wrote in message

> Robert Morein said:
>
>> Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
>> I'd like to throw him a call.
>
> http://www.gpbc.org/
>
>
> People have threatened to rat out the Kroo to his pastor
> before, but nobody has ever followed through.

Middius knows better than this because he coached someone
who did exactly that.

Only people who have no idea about churches work would think
twice about ratting someone out to a pastor. Letsee on the
one hand we have an unknown Usenet sickie, and on the other
hand you've got this guy who been right there for the church
for decades.

[Margaret von B.]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
> [dot] net> wrote in message
>
>> Robert Morein said:
>>
>>> Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
>>> I'd like to throw him a call.
>>
>> http://www.gpbc.org/
>>
>>
>> People have threatened to rat out the Kroo to his pastor
>> before, but nobody has ever followed through.
>
> Middius knows better than this because he coached someone who did exactly
> that.
>
> Only people who have no idea about churches work would think twice about
> ratting someone out to a pastor. Letsee on the one hand we have an unknown
> Usenet sickie, and on the other hand you've got this guy who been right
> there for the church for decades while sharing common interests with many
> catholic priests.


Indeed. How sad.

Margaret

[Margaret von B.]

"Sylvan Morein" > wrote in message
.. .
> In article ,
> "Goofball_star_dot_etal" > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:00:04 -0500, "Robert Morein"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
>>> I'd like to throw him a call.
>>>
>> What you really need is a shrink not a pastor, pal.
>
> He's had a shrink, several in fact. Since he refuses to take his
> medication
> and routinely declares himself "cured", there is little we can do. Bob
> sits
> in his room and telephones around the world, claiming to have information
> about a wide variety of people. He thinks that because people are polite
> and
> listen to his rantings that they actually believe him - but they put the
> phone down and either shake their head in pity or roar in peals of
> laughter.
> He senses that everyone is laughing at him but without strong psychotropic
> medication his grasp of reality is tenuous at best. Mr. Krueger's pastor,
> if
> called, will likely react with pity and compassion, because clearly no
> rational human would take a call from a stranger seriously - a pastor that
> knows and respects Krueger would easily peg Bob's rantings of that coming
> from a lunatic.
>
> Sad, really. Sadder that he's 53 years old and never been employed, or
> contributed anything of value to society. Of this fact I am deeply
> ashamed.
>
> Brian McCarthy, Obesely Insane
>

So Brian, where do the scales tip these days?

Cheers,

Margaret

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...

> Only people who have no idea about churches work would think twice about
> ratting someone out to a pastor. Letsee on the one hand we have an unknown
> Usenet sickie, and on the other hand you've got this guy who been right
> there for the church for decades.


What a church! more worried about the collection plate than about sin.
Still trying to buy your way into heaven?

[Ruud Broens]

"Margaret von B." > wrote in message
...
:
: "Sylvan Morein" > wrote in message
: .. .
: > In article ,
.. Of this fact I am deeply
: > ashamed.
: >
: > Brian McCarthy, Obesely Insane
: >
:
: So Brian, where do the scales tip these days?
:
: Cheers,
:
: Margaret
:
hmm, is there such a thing as a freudian slip of the eye ?
for a sec i read "where do the scalpels tip go these days :-)

R
disassembler

[Robert Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius a écrit :
>>
>> Robert Morein said:
>>
>>
>>>Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
>>>I'd like to throw him a call.
>>
>>
>> http://www.gpbc.org/
>>
>>
>> People have threatened to rat out the Kroo to his pastor before, but
>> nobody
>> has ever followed through.
>
>
> This sounds like a challenge to Bob, no ?
>
It's something I have no problem doing. I would let Arny's posts do most of
the talking. I would simply outline the problem in the most elementary
terms, which is Arny's decoration of his posts, many of which contain useful
information, with gratuitous verbal aggression, and the apparent desire to
dominate this milieu.. I am not seeking to criminalize Arny. However,
gratuitous verbal aggression is a sign of a disturbance of the spirit, which
most pastoral workers consider within their purview.

If, at any point, anyone feels motivated to get this information, I promise
it will not lie fallow.

Much to McCarty's regret, I am not shy about talking on the phone.

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> What a church! more worried about the collection plate than about sin.
> Still trying to buy your way into heaven?

And still using pre-adolescent children as shields.

[Margaret von B.]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> It's something I have no problem doing. I would let Arny's posts do most
> of the talking. I would simply outline the problem in the most elementary
> terms, which is Arny's decoration of his posts, many of which contain
> useful information, with gratuitous verbal aggression, and the apparent
> desire to dominate this milieu.. I am not seeking to criminalize Arny.
> However, gratuitous verbal aggression is a sign of a disturbance of the
> spirit, which most pastoral workers consider within their purview.

Hi Rob!

Arnii has posted this information before so I'm sure it is out there.
However, I would think twice before involving outsiders into this mess. Do
you think for a moment that his church doesn't know what an utterly sick
asshole he is? He has said before that he hangs out with his priest all the
time. Go figure.

I think it would be more illuminating if you went to meet him mano a mano to
sort out your differences. I believe a former RAO poster Mark Philips did
something like that and almost sent Krueger to the orbit.

>
> If, at any point, anyone feels motivated to get this information, I
> promise it will not lie fallow.
>
> Much to McCarty's regret, I am not shy about talking on the phone.
>

But that would be boring for the rest of us...unless....... :-)


Cheers,

Margaret

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> I would let Arny's posts do most of
> the talking. I would simply outline the problem in the most elementary
> terms, which is Arny's decoration of his posts, many of which contain useful
> information, with gratuitous verbal aggression, and the apparent desire to
> dominate this milieu.

I believe Mr. **** just claimed somebody already ratted him out to his
pastor. It could be that Turdy is ... confused, let's say, about which
authority figure received the reports of his nastiness. Marc Phillips said
several times he reported the Beast's apparent pedophiliac tendencies to
the police. Given™ Krooger's overall mental imbalance, it's quite possible
he is unable to distinguish the police from his pastor.

Or perhaps Mr. **** will share some details of the incident he alleges. Who
got the pastor involved? How long ago? What did this person accuse Mr. ****
of doing or saying? Tell us everything, Arnii. I promise we won't lose any
respect for you. ;-)

[Robert Morein]

"Margaret von B." > wrote in message
...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> It's something I have no problem doing. I would let Arny's posts do most
>> of the talking. I would simply outline the problem in the most elementary
>> terms, which is Arny's decoration of his posts, many of which contain
>> useful information, with gratuitous verbal aggression, and the apparent
>> desire to dominate this milieu.. I am not seeking to criminalize Arny.
>> However, gratuitous verbal aggression is a sign of a disturbance of the
>> spirit, which most pastoral workers consider within their purview.
>
> Hi Rob!
>
> Arnii has posted this information before so I'm sure it is out there.
> However, I would think twice before involving outsiders into this mess. Do
> you think for a moment that his church doesn't know what an utterly sick
> asshole he is? He has said before that he hangs out with his priest all
> the time. Go figure.
>
Margaret, maybe I'll get blown off, but I'm not sensitive. In fact, I'm
pretty much made of cast iron. If I do get blown off, I'll post how it came
down. Some people exhibit multiple personalities. Dennis Rader was a church
deacon. McCarty was a "businessman", who fooled a lot of people. Arny
acquitted himself in a dignified and competent manner in The Debate, and now
he's back to this.

> I think it would be more illuminating if you went to meet him mano a mano
> to sort out your differences. I believe a former RAO poster Mark Philips
> did something like that and almost sent Krueger to the orbit.
>
My goals are quite modest. I want someone Arny respects to encourage him to
edit out the contempt, hate, and paranoia. The difference between Arny and
the rest of us is that he actually thinks he has enemies. In comparison,
George at his worst has a gadfly aspect to him. His are the multiple
pinpricks of a swarm of mosquitoes, while Arny's is a bite to the bone.

I can only speak for myself, but I'd break bread with anybody here.
>>
>> If, at any point, anyone feels motivated to get this information, I
>> promise it will not lie fallow.
>>
>> Much to McCarty's regret, I am not shy about talking on the phone.
>>
>
> But that would be boring for the rest of us...unless....... :-)
>
I do have a McCarty recording, obtained off an answering machine (which
makes it legal), which I will be happy to send to anybody in whose email
address I have reasonable confidence. I don't tape where there are legal
question marks. However, I am still eager to hear The Tape, which as the
late, lamented Devil says, "shows Arny is a genuinely nasty man."
>
> Cheers,
>
> Margaret
>
>
>

[Arny Krueger]

"Margaret von B." >
wrote in message


> I think it would be more illuminating if you went to meet
> him mano a mano to sort out your differences.

Interesting concept. Atkinson could have met with me "mano a
mano" on any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our
differences. While I did meet with one or more Stereophile
staffers at HE2005, Atkinson hid from me.

>I believe a
> former RAO poster Mark Philips did something like that
> and almost sent Krueger to the orbit.

Philips once posted here that he stalked me at my house in
Grosse Pointe. He was way to chicken to actually try to meet
with me. He was also probably lying because he got a lot of
details about my house wrong.

Bottom line - the whole lot of you talk big on Usenet, but
in real life you're all a bunch of whimps.

[dave weil]

On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:24:20 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>It's something I have no problem doing. I would let Arny's posts do most of
>the talking. I would simply outline the problem in the most elementary
>terms, which is Arny's decoration of his posts, many of which contain useful
>information, with gratuitous verbal aggression, and the apparent desire to
>dominate this milieu.. I am not seeking to criminalize Arny. However,
>gratuitous verbal aggression is a sign of a disturbance of the spirit, which
>most pastoral workers consider within their purview.
>
>If, at any point, anyone feels motivated to get this information, I promise
>it will not lie fallow.
>
>Much to McCarty's regret, I am not shy about talking on the phone.

Taking this stuff into "real life" is rather stupid and venal, if you
want to know the truth.

[John Atkinson]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> Atkinson could have met with me "mano a mano" on
> any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our differences.

I wonder who that it is with me in the photo "above the
fold" at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .
Could it be Arny Krueger, I wonder?

> While I did meet with one or more Stereophile
> staffers at HE2005, Atkinson hid from me.

In plain sight. :-)

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> I do have a McCarty recording, obtained off an answering machine (which
> makes it legal), which I will be happy to send to anybody in whose email
> address I have reasonable confidence.

I would like to hear it. You can email to this address.

[Clyde Slick]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:24:20 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>>It's something I have no problem doing. I would let Arny's posts do most
>>of
>>the talking. I would simply outline the problem in the most elementary
>>terms, which is Arny's decoration of his posts, many of which contain
>>useful
>>information, with gratuitous verbal aggression, and the apparent desire to
>>dominate this milieu.. I am not seeking to criminalize Arny. However,
>>gratuitous verbal aggression is a sign of a disturbance of the spirit,
>>which
>>most pastoral workers consider within their purview.
>>
>>If, at any point, anyone feels motivated to get this information, I
>>promise
>>it will not lie fallow.
>>
>>Much to McCarty's regret, I am not shy about talking on the phone.
>
> Taking this stuff into "real life" is rather stupid and venal, if you
> want to know the truth.

Absolutely agreed

[Clyde Slick]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:24:20 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>>It's something I have no problem doing. I would let Arny's posts do most
>>of
>>the talking. I would simply outline the problem in the most elementary
>>terms, which is Arny's decoration of his posts, many of which contain
>>useful
>>information, with gratuitous verbal aggression, and the apparent desire to
>>dominate this milieu.. I am not seeking to criminalize Arny. However,
>>gratuitous verbal aggression is a sign of a disturbance of the spirit,
>>which
>>most pastoral workers consider within their purview.
>>
>>If, at any point, anyone feels motivated to get this information, I
>>promise
>>it will not lie fallow.
>>
>>Much to McCarty's regret, I am not shy about talking on the phone.
>
> Taking this stuff into "real life" is rather stupid and venal, if you
> want to know the truth.

It something Bwian would do.Bob should be better than that.
Same as I was opposed to the Wheeler lawsuit.

[Clyde Slick]

"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> Atkinson could have met with me "mano a mano" on
>> any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our differences.
>
> I wonder who that it is with me in the photo "above the
> fold" at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .
> Could it be Arny Krueger, I wonder?
>
>> While I did meet with one or more Stereophile
>> staffers at HE2005, Atkinson hid from me.
>
> In plain sight. :-)
>


Who is that Disco Man?
I can't get enough of those wide shirt lapels
hanging over his coat.

[surf]

"dave weil" > wrote ...
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:24:20 -0500, "Robert Morein"
>>
>>Much to McCarty's regret, I am not shy about talking on the phone.
>
> Taking this stuff into "real life" is rather stupid and venal, if you
> want to know the truth.

Agreed. Why would you want to lower yourself to the level
of McCarty or Malesweski?? Can't you make your points here
on equal ground?

[Margaret von B.]

"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> Atkinson could have met with me "mano a mano" on
>> any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our differences.
>
> I wonder who that it is with me in the photo "above the
> fold" at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .


Hi John,

Why are you staring at a horse's ass?

Where's Arny?


> Could it be Arny Krueger, I wonder?

Nooooooo.....really? Is that Arny?


Cheers,

Margaret

[George M. Middius]

Margaret von B. said:

> Nooooooo.....really? Is that Arny?

The face matches the voice, doesn't it?

[dave weil]

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 16:56:34 GMT, "Margaret von B."
> wrote:

>
>"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>> Atkinson could have met with me "mano a mano" on
>>> any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our differences.
>>
>> I wonder who that it is with me in the photo "above the
>> fold" at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .

What's surprising is that this article seems to claim that Arnold is
63. I didn't know that he was that old.

Cue oldster Lionel's gratuitous retort about MY age.

[Margaret von B.]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "John Atkinson" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>>
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>> Atkinson could have met with me "mano a mano" on
>>> any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our differences.
>>
>> I wonder who that it is with me in the photo "above the
>> fold" at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .
>> Could it be Arny Krueger, I wonder?
>>
>>> While I did meet with one or more Stereophile
>>> staffers at HE2005, Atkinson hid from me.
>>
>> In plain sight. :-)
>>
>
>
> Who is that Disco Man?
> I can't get enough of those wide shirt lapels
> hanging over his coat.



It could simply be a hospital uniform, you know....

Cheers,

Margaret

[Clyde Slick]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 16:56:34 GMT, "Margaret von B."
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>>
>>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>>> Atkinson could have met with me "mano a mano" on
>>>> any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our differences.
>>>
>>> I wonder who that it is with me in the photo "above the
>>> fold" at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .
>
> What's surprising is that this article seems to claim that Arnold is
> 63. I didn't know that he was that old.
>
> Cue oldster Lionel's gratuitous retort about MY age.

I thought he was 58, maybe 59 by now.

[Arny Krueger]

"John Atkinson" > wrote
in message
oups.com
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> Atkinson could have met with me "mano a mano" on
>> any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our differences.
>
> I wonder who that it is with me in the photo "above the
> fold" at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .
> Could it be Arny Krueger, I wonder?

That was a formal meeting with a very narrowly stated
purpose.

>> While I did meet with one or more Stereophile
>> staffers at HE2005, Atkinson hid from me.
>
> In plain sight. :-)

While hiding behind a meeting's agenda.

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> > What's surprising is that this article seems to claim that Arnold is
> > 63. I didn't know that he was that old.

> I thought he was 58, maybe 59 by now.

We can all agree Krooger would be better off dead.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:15:35 -0500, George M. Middius <cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote:

>
>
>Margaret von B. said:
>
>> Nooooooo.....really? Is that Arny?
>
>The face matches the voice, doesn't it?

We haven't seen yours yet, George.

Something to look forward to, eh?

[paul packer]

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:18:48 -0600, dave weil >
wrote:

>On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:24:20 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:
>
>>It's something I have no problem doing. I would let Arny's posts do most of
>>the talking. I would simply outline the problem in the most elementary
>>terms, which is Arny's decoration of his posts, many of which contain useful
>>information, with gratuitous verbal aggression, and the apparent desire to
>>dominate this milieu.. I am not seeking to criminalize Arny. However,
>>gratuitous verbal aggression is a sign of a disturbance of the spirit, which
>>most pastoral workers consider within their purview.
>>
>>If, at any point, anyone feels motivated to get this information, I promise
>>it will not lie fallow.
>>
>>Much to McCarty's regret, I am not shy about talking on the phone.
>
>Taking this stuff into "real life" is rather stupid and venal, if you
>want to know the truth.


A similar debate is going on now on aus.hi-fi re Phil Allison, who has
been making unwanted phone calls to another poster. I'm absolutely
opposed to taking usenet business outside usenet unless a crime is
being/is about to be committed.

[George M. Middius]

paul packer said:

> >The face matches the voice, doesn't it?

> We haven't seen yours yet, George.

Not true. Devil posted a picture of me once. Or rather, he posted a link to
my pic.

[surf]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "John Atkinson" > wrote
> in message
> oups.com
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>> Atkinson could have met with me "mano a mano" on
>>> any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our differences.
>>
>> I wonder who that it is with me in the photo "above the
>> fold" at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .
>> Could it be Arny Krueger, I wonder?
>
> That was a formal meeting with a very narrowly stated purpose.
>
>>> While I did meet with one or more Stereophile
>>> staffers at HE2005, Atkinson hid from me.
>>
>> In plain sight. :-)
>
> While hiding behind a meeting's agenda.


Get over yourself, Arny. Is it possible John had other things
to worry about that weekend? You both should be commended
for representing your viewpoints well.

At least he is always a nice guy and a gentleman. The same can't be
said of you.

[Arny Krueger]

"surf" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "John Atkinson" > wrote
>> in message
>> oups.com
>>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>>> Atkinson could have met with me "mano a mano" on
>>>> any of 3 days at HE2005 to sort out our differences.
>>>
>>> I wonder who that it is with me in the photo "above the
>>> fold" at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .
>>> Could it be Arny Krueger, I wonder?
>>
>> That was a formal meeting with a very narrowly stated
>> purpose.
>>>> While I did meet with one or more Stereophile
>>>> staffers at HE2005, Atkinson hid from me.
>>>
>>> In plain sight. :-)
>>
>> While hiding behind a meeting's agenda.
>
>
> Get over yourself, Arny. Is it possible John had other
> things to worry about that weekend?

Given Atkinson's state of preparation which was close to
zilch, there's obvious evidence to support that viewpoint.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:24:24 -0500, George M. Middius <cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote:

>
>
>paul packer said:
>
>> >The face matches the voice, doesn't it?
>
>> We haven't seen yours yet, George.
>
>Not true. Devil posted a picture of me once. Or rather, he posted a link to
>my pic.

Pity that link isn't still there.

[George M. Middius]

paul packer said:

> >Not true. Devil posted a picture of me once. Or rather, he posted a link to
> >my pic.

> Pity that link isn't still there.

How do you know that, paulie?

[surf]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
wrote:
>
> paul packer said:
>
>> >Not true. Devil posted a picture of me once. Or rather, he posted a link
>> >to
>> >my pic.
>
>> Pity that link isn't still there.
>
> How do you know that, paulie?

I have a picture of a dark haired young man. Hair parted on the
right. Plaid shirt. Either a backpack or another kind of shoulder bag.
Is that you?

[George M. Middius]

surf said:

> >> >Devil posted a picture of me once. Or rather, he posted a link
> >> >to my pic.

> >> Pity that link isn't still there.

> > How do you know that, paulie?

> I have a picture of a dark haired young man. Hair parted on the
> right. Plaid shirt. Either a backpack or another kind of shoulder bag.
> Is that you?

No, not even close. But you knew that. ;-)

[paul packer]

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 05:45:24 -0500, George M. Middius <cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote:

>
>
>surf said:
>
>> >> >Devil posted a picture of me once. Or rather, he posted a link
>> >> >to my pic.
>
>> >> Pity that link isn't still there.
>
>> > How do you know that, paulie?
>
>> I have a picture of a dark haired young man. Hair parted on the
>> right. Plaid shirt. Either a backpack or another kind of shoulder bag.
>> Is that you?
>
>No, not even close. But you knew that. ;-)
>

Well, it's how I always pictured you. :-)

[George M. Middius]

paul packer said:

> >> I have a picture of a dark haired young man. Hair parted on the
> >> right. Plaid shirt. Either a backpack or another kind of shoulder bag.
> >> Is that you?

> >No, not even close. But you knew that. ;-)

> Well, it's how I always pictured you. :-)

Does your wife know?

[surf]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
wrote...
>
> surf said:
>
>> >> >Devil posted a picture of me once. Or rather, he posted a link
>> >> >to my pic.
>
>> >> Pity that link isn't still there.
>
>> > How do you know that, paulie?
>
>> I have a picture of a dark haired young man. Hair parted on the
>> right. Plaid shirt. Either a backpack or another kind of shoulder bag.
>> Is that you?
>
> No, not even close. But you knew that. ;-)


How would I know that? It's a picture in my pic dir
and it's labeled "George". I thought maybe it came
from a link from Graham.

[George M. Middius]

surf said:

> > No, not even close. But you knew that. ;-)

> How would I know that?

Because I sent you a pic once that looks nothing like that guy.

> It's a picture in my pic dir
> and it's labeled "George". I thought maybe it came
> from a link from Graham.

Maybe it's just his fantasy of what I look like. According to Bobo, R/G/D
is terrified that Harry Potter might be gay.

[Sylvan Morein]

In article ,
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" > wrote:

> On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:00:04 -0500, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have contact info for Krueger's church?
>> I'd like to throw him a call.
>>
> What you really need is a shrink not a pastor, pal.

He's had a shrink, several in fact. Since he refuses to take his medication
and routinely declares himself "cured", there is little we can do. Bob sits
in his room and telephones around the world, claiming to have information
about a wide variety of people. He thinks that because people are polite and
listen to his rantings that they actually believe him - but they put the
phone down and either shake their head in pity or roar in peals of laughter.
He senses that everyone is laughing at him but without strong psychotropic
medication his grasp of reality is tenuous at best. Mr. Krueger's pastor, if
called, will likely react with pity and compassion, because clearly no
rational human would take a call from a stranger seriously - a pastor that
knows and respects Krueger would easily peg Bob's rantings of that coming
from a lunatic.

Sad, really. Sadder that he's 53 years old and never been employed, or
contributed anything of value to society. Of this fact I am deeply ashamed.

Sylvan Morein, DDS