group for digital audio processing ?

[pehache]

Hi,

in the sub-hierarchy rec.audio.*, what is the group most suited to
topics around digital audio processing ? For instance about the tools
to generate MP3s, to record music on a PC from an analog source,...

Or is there a better group for that in the usenet big eights ?

Thanks,

(FU2 rec.audio.misc)


--
pehache

[martin griffith]

On 8 Nov 2005 06:28:43 -0800, in rec.audio.pro "pehache"
> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>in the sub-hierarchy rec.audio.*, what is the group most suited to
>topics around digital audio processing ? For instance about the tools
>to generate MP3s, to record music on a PC from an analog source,...
>
>Or is there a better group for that in the usenet big eights ?
>
>Thanks,
>
>(FU2 rec.audio.misc)
Not sure about Usenet, but I just found this
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php

havent really done much digging innit, but it looks hopeful


martin

[pehache]

martin griffith wrote:

> Not sure about Usenet, but I just found this
> http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php
>
> havent really done much digging innit, but it looks hopeful
>

Yes, I saw it. It looks pretty good, indeed.

But I my question was definitely about usenet groups. I find them much
more convenient than web forums, most of time.

--
pehache

[Joe Kesselman]

pehache wrote:
> in the sub-hierarchy rec.audio.*, what is the group most suited to
> topics around digital audio processing ? For instance about the tools
> to generate MP3s, to record music on a PC from an analog source,...

Pro-level tools, and amateur-level tools, and theory would be different
groups. Think about what your specific question is...

[TimPerry]

"pehache" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Hi,
>
> in the sub-hierarchy rec.audio.*, what is the group most suited to
> topics around digital audio processing ? For instance about the tools
> to generate MP3s, to record music on a PC from an analog source,...
>
> Or is there a better group for that in the usenet big eights ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> (FU2 rec.audio.misc)
>
>
> --
> pehache
>

you best source will be rec.audio.pro

[pehache]

Joe Kesselman wrote:
>
> Pro-level tools, and amateur-level tools, and theory would be different
> groups. Think about what your specific question is...

Well, what would be the groups for these different topics, then ?

--
pehache

[[email protected]]

I think this group is suitable for such discussion.

Chris
(REAL strings at realistic prices).

[pehache]

wrote:
> I think this group is suitable for such discussion.
>

Hum... Which one :-) ? I posted my message in 3 groups ?

--
pehache

[pehache]

wrote:
> I think this group is suitable for such discussion.
>

Hum... Which one :-) ? I posted my message in 3 groups...

--
pehache