Alarming calculations!

[paul packer]

I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem much too
complicated for anyone on this NG to understand, how long Mike spends
posting here, and the figures are truly shocking.

At best estimate, calculating a typing speed of 50 wpm, Mike spends a
little over 23 hours a day posting here. Assuming he needs at least 20
minutes for intake of sustenance (assuming of course that he's not on
a drip), that means he gets less than three quarters of an hour's
sleep a day, and thus no REM sleep, which of course means that he's
been posting here from the beginning in a state of twilight
consciousness, possibly with peripheral delusions, and probably with
symptoms of malnutrition to boot. Now I know this makes his dedication
to the cause of Arnie and ABX truly award worthy, but I believe this
is an unhealthy lifestyle and that an ambulance--equipped with a
gurney with very strong straps--should be despatched to his address
immediately. Barring that his ISP should pull the plug for his own
good. I'm all for dedication, especially to Arnie, who certainly
deserves all the help he can get, but one's health should always come
first. That's what my Mum told me.

[George M. Middius]

paul packer said:

> I'm all for dedication, especially to Arnie, who certainly
> deserves all the help he can get, but one's health should always come
> first. That's what my Mum told me.

"It's not nice to fool Mother Packer."

[Arny Krueger]

"paul packer" > wrote in message

> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem
> much too complicated for anyone on this NG to understand,
> how long Mike spends posting here, and the figures are
> truly shocking.

Translation from Packerese: There are no real calculations,
Paul is just making this all up.

[George Middius]

The Krooborg is mortified.

>> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem
>> much too complicated for anyone on this NG to understand,
>> how long Mike spends posting here, and the figures are
>> truly shocking.

>Translation from Packerese: There are no real calculations,
>Paul is just making this all up.

No! Really? I can't believe it. paulie, you stop that this instant! Arnii is,
like, totally alLERgic to "made up" calculations. Are you trying to give Arnii a
meltdown or something?

From now on, all sicicccncece stuff posted on RAO must adhere to the Three Laws
of 'Borgotics.


'Borgotics Law 1: Unthinking belief in aBxism dogma shall not ever be
contaminated by real-world data.

'Borgotics Law 2: All unbelievers in aBxism dogma shall be torrentially
bombarded with Krooturds and Mikey-vomit until they get bored and leave.

'Borgotics Law 3: Arnii Krooger is a kristian but only on Sundays. The
other days, Arnii is permitted to be the nasty, demented whack-job we've
all come to know on Usenet. As long as he hypocritically goes to church on
Sundays and pretends to repent, Krooger (according to his own stated
beliefs) is automatically forgiven for his transgressions during the other
six days of the week.


..
..
..
..

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
>
>> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem
>> much too complicated for anyone on this NG to understand,
>> how long Mike spends posting here, and the figures are
>> truly shocking.
>
> Translation from Packerese: There are no real calculations, Paul is just
> making this all up.
Ya think? :-)

That's pretty standard stuff.

[Robert Morein]

What's more alarming is that Mikey is not a touch typist. He's
hunt-and-peck, typist, a spastic with low-normal IQ.
When these disabilities are factored in, it becomes obvious that Mikey may
be the only real "no-lifer" on this group. Even Arny gets out to bray at
church services.

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem much too
> complicated for anyone on this NG to understand, how long Mike spends
> posting here, and the figures are truly shocking.
>
> At best estimate, calculating a typing speed of 50 wpm, Mike spends a
> little over 23 hours a day posting here. Assuming he needs at least 20
> minutes for intake of sustenance (assuming of course that he's not on
> a drip), that means he gets less than three quarters of an hour's
> sleep a day, and thus no REM sleep, which of course means that he's
> been posting here from the beginning in a state of twilight
> consciousness, possibly with peripheral delusions, and probably with
> symptoms of malnutrition to boot. Now I know this makes his dedication
> to the cause of Arnie and ABX truly award worthy, but I believe this
> is an unhealthy lifestyle and that an ambulance--equipped with a
> gurney with very strong straps--should be despatched to his address
> immediately. Barring that his ISP should pull the plug for his own
> good. I'm all for dedication, especially to Arnie, who certainly
> deserves all the help he can get, but one's health should always come
> first. That's what my Mum told me.
>

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
>
> > I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem
> > much too complicated for anyone on this NG to understand,
> > how long Mike spends posting here, and the figures are
> > truly shocking.
>
> Translation from Packerese: There are no real calculations,
> Paul is just making this all up.

Once again Arny proves that no one can fool him. Not for long. He's
seen through Mark Twain only a year or two after being forced to read
him at school..
Ludovic Mirabel

[Robert Morein]

> wrote in message
k.net...
>
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> "paul packer" > wrote in message
>>
>>> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem
>>> much too complicated for anyone on this NG to understand,
>>> how long Mike spends posting here, and the figures are
>>> truly shocking.
>>
>> Translation from Packerese: There are no real calculations, Paul is just
>> making this all up.
> Ya think? :-)
>
> That's pretty standard stuff.
Mon Dieu! Krueger uses that phrase. What a coincidence!

[George Middius]

Robert Morein said:

>> That's pretty standard stuff.

>Mon Dieu! Krueger uses that phrase. What a coincidence!

Its like Robert if, you had two brain cells two rub together you might be able
to buy a clue. Thanks MOrien for admitting that Mikey is smarter than you, too.

[Robert Morein]

"George Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
>>> That's pretty standard stuff.
>
>>Mon Dieu! Krueger uses that phrase. What a coincidence!
>
> Its like Robert if, you had two brain cells two rub together you might be
> able
> to buy a clue. Thanks MOrien for admitting that Mikey is smarter than you,
> too.
>
I see you put it through the Kroospeak spell mangler. Very thorough.

[Robert Morein]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
>
>> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem
>> much too complicated for anyone on this NG to understand,
>> how long Mike spends posting here, and the figures are
>> truly shocking.
>
> Translation from Packerese: There are no real calculations, Paul is just
> making this all up.
You're kidding.
I've got news for you, Arny. Saturday Night Wrestling isn't real.

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
>
>> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem
>> much too complicated for anyone on this NG to understand,
>> how long Mike spends posting here, and the figures are
>> truly shocking.
>
> Translation from Packerese: There are no real calculations, Paul is just
> making this all up.
But, if he were to multiply by 2, he'd ahv the approximate amount of time
used by Morein and Middius to harrass people.

[Robert Morein]

On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 00:09:44 GMT, > wrote:

>
>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
>> "paul packer" > wrote in message
>>
>>> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem
>>> much too complicated for anyone on this NG to understand,
>>> how long Mike spends posting here, and the figures are
>>> truly shocking.
>>
>> Translation from Packerese: There are no real calculations, Paul is just
>> making this all up.
>But, if he were to multiply by 2, he'd ahv the approximate amount of time
>used by Morein and Middius to harrass people.
>

HARRASS?
STOP IT BRIAN !

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem much too
> complicated for anyone on this NG to understand, how long Mike spends
> posting here, and the figures are truly shocking.
>
> At best estimate, calculating a typing speed of 50 wpm, Mike spends a
> little over 23 hours a day posting here. Assuming he needs at least 20
> minutes for intake of sustenance (assuming of course that he's not on
> a drip), that means he gets less than three quarters of an hour's
> sleep a day, and thus no REM sleep, which of course means that he's
> been posting here from the beginning in a state of twilight
> consciousness, possibly with peripheral delusions, and probably with
> symptoms of malnutrition to boot. Now I know this makes his dedication
> to the cause of Arnie and ABX truly award worthy, but I believe this
> is an unhealthy lifestyle and that an ambulance--equipped with a
> gurney with very strong straps--should be despatched to his address
> immediately. Barring that his ISP should pull the plug for his own
> good. I'm all for dedication, especially to Arnie, who certainly
> deserves all the help he can get, but one's health should always come
> first. That's what my Mum told me.
>
I'm trying to recal when I've ever been less than civil with you Paul.

What a relief to know that character is not an issue for you.

[Robert Morein]

> wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
> > I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem much too
> > complicated for anyone on this NG to understand, how long Mike spends
> > posting here, and the figures are truly shocking.
> >
> > At best estimate, calculating a typing speed of 50 wpm, Mike spends a
> > little over 23 hours a day posting here. Assuming he needs at least 20
> > minutes for intake of sustenance (assuming of course that he's not on
> > a drip), that means he gets less than three quarters of an hour's
> > sleep a day, and thus no REM sleep, which of course means that he's
> > been posting here from the beginning in a state of twilight
> > consciousness, possibly with peripheral delusions, and probably with
> > symptoms of malnutrition to boot. Now I know this makes his dedication
> > to the cause of Arnie and ABX truly award worthy, but I believe this
> > is an unhealthy lifestyle and that an ambulance--equipped with a
> > gurney with very strong straps--should be despatched to his address
> > immediately. Barring that his ISP should pull the plug for his own
> > good. I'm all for dedication, especially to Arnie, who certainly
> > deserves all the help he can get, but one's health should always come
> > first. That's what my Mum told me.
> >
> I'm trying to recal when I've ever been less than civil with you Paul.
>
Mikey, you have no memory to speak of. Recall is a futile exercise.

> What a relief to know that character is not an issue for you.
>
Hypocrisy and lack of self awareness, reply, noted. (Krueger #27).

[EddieM]

> nyob123 wrote
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> What a relief to moo moo moo !

[paul packer]

On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:00:15 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"paul packer" > wrote in message

>> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem
>> much too complicated for anyone on this NG to understand,
>> how long Mike spends posting here, and the figures are
>> truly shocking.
>
>Translation from Packerese: There are no real calculations,
>Paul is just making this all up.

I just knew that theorem wasn't too complicated for you, Arnie! :-)

[paul packer]

On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 01:02:45 GMT, > wrote:

>
>"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
>> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem much too
>> complicated for anyone on this NG to understand, how long Mike spends
>> posting here, and the figures are truly shocking.
>>
>> At best estimate, calculating a typing speed of 50 wpm, Mike spends a
>> little over 23 hours a day posting here. Assuming he needs at least 20
>> minutes for intake of sustenance (assuming of course that he's not on
>> a drip), that means he gets less than three quarters of an hour's
>> sleep a day, and thus no REM sleep, which of course means that he's
>> been posting here from the beginning in a state of twilight
>> consciousness, possibly with peripheral delusions, and probably with
>> symptoms of malnutrition to boot. Now I know this makes his dedication
>> to the cause of Arnie and ABX truly award worthy, but I believe this
>> is an unhealthy lifestyle and that an ambulance--equipped with a
>> gurney with very strong straps--should be despatched to his address
>> immediately. Barring that his ISP should pull the plug for his own
>> good. I'm all for dedication, especially to Arnie, who certainly
>> deserves all the help he can get, but one's health should always come
>> first. That's what my Mum told me.
>>
>I'm trying to recal when I've ever been less than civil with you Paul.
>
>What a relief to know that character is not an issue for you.

Mike, you're doing an Arny Krueger, which is to say seeing an attack
where none is taking place. The above is just a gentle, hopefully
humorous dig at the number of posts you generate, not a monstrous
assault on your soul. Please don't copy Arnie in having no sense of
humour whatsoever.

[George M. Middius]

paul packer said:

> Please don't copy Arnie[sic] in having no sense of
> humour whatsoever.

But Arnii has already prooved™ that your calculations were "lies". Where
is the humor in that?

[[email protected]]

George M. Middius wrote:
> paul packer said:
>
> > Please don't copy Arnie[sic] in having no sense of
> > humour whatsoever.
>
> But Arnii has already prooved™ that your calculations were "lies". Where
> is the humor in that?

It's true that Arnie did see through my little pretext. I guess that
shows the dangers of someone with a low I.Q trying to fool someone
with a high I.Q. I won't make that mistake again. :-)

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
oups.com
> George M. Middius wrote:
>> paul packer said:
>>
>>> Please don't copy Arnie[sic] in having no sense of
>>> humour whatsoever.
>>
>> But Arnii has already proovedT that your calculations
>> were "lies". Where is the humor in that?
>
> It's true that Arnie did see through my little pretext. I
> guess that shows the dangers of someone with a low I.Q
> trying to fool someone with a high I.Q. I won't make that
> mistake again. :-)

I wouldn't be ashamed of having an IQ in the 110-120 range
if I were you, Paul. It's OK, just not near-genius or
genius.

[Robert Morein]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> > wrote in message
> oups.com
> > George M. Middius wrote:
> >> paul packer said:
> >>
> >>> Please don't copy Arnie[sic] in having no sense of
> >>> humour whatsoever.
> >>
> >> But Arnii has already proovedT that your calculations
> >> were "lies". Where is the humor in that?
> >
> > It's true that Arnie did see through my little pretext. I
> > guess that shows the dangers of someone with a low I.Q
> > trying to fool someone with a high I.Q. I won't make that
> > mistake again. :-)
>
> I wouldn't be ashamed of having an IQ in the 110-120 range
> if I were you, Paul. It's OK, just not near-genius or
> genius.
>
Arny, it is highly unscientific of you, as well as antisocial, to
deliberately insult Paul in this way. You cannot know what his IQ is from
his posts.

Only in the case of obvious deficiencies, such as those of your sidekick
Mikey McKelviphibian, can a person be identified as a lowlife.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:10:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

> wrote in message
oups.com
>> George M. Middius wrote:
>>> paul packer said:
>>>
>>>> Please don't copy Arnie[sic] in having no sense of
>>>> humour whatsoever.
>>>
>>> But Arnii has already proovedT that your calculations
>>> were "lies". Where is the humor in that?
>>
>> It's true that Arnie did see through my little pretext. I
>> guess that shows the dangers of someone with a low I.Q
>> trying to fool someone with a high I.Q. I won't make that
>> mistake again. :-)
>
>I wouldn't be ashamed of having an IQ in the 110-120 range
>if I were you, Paul. It's OK, just not near-genius or
>genius.

Proving you have no sense of humour once again, Arny?

And you obviously missed my post where I informed you that my I.Q.
consistently measures between 130--135. Nothing like the level of
yours, of course, but sufficient to keep me from bumping into the
furniture.

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 01:02:45 GMT, > wrote:
>
>>
>>"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
>>> I've just finished calculating, courtesy of a theorem much too
>>> complicated for anyone on this NG to understand, how long Mike spends
>>> posting here, and the figures are truly shocking.
>>>
>>> At best estimate, calculating a typing speed of 50 wpm, Mike spends a
>>> little over 23 hours a day posting here. Assuming he needs at least 20
>>> minutes for intake of sustenance (assuming of course that he's not on
>>> a drip), that means he gets less than three quarters of an hour's
>>> sleep a day, and thus no REM sleep, which of course means that he's
>>> been posting here from the beginning in a state of twilight
>>> consciousness, possibly with peripheral delusions, and probably with
>>> symptoms of malnutrition to boot. Now I know this makes his dedication
>>> to the cause of Arnie and ABX truly award worthy, but I believe this
>>> is an unhealthy lifestyle and that an ambulance--equipped with a
>>> gurney with very strong straps--should be despatched to his address
>>> immediately. Barring that his ISP should pull the plug for his own
>>> good. I'm all for dedication, especially to Arnie, who certainly
>>> deserves all the help he can get, but one's health should always come
>>> first. That's what my Mum told me.
>>>
>>I'm trying to recal when I've ever been less than civil with you Paul.
>>
>>What a relief to know that character is not an issue for you.
>
> Mike, you're doing an Arny Krueger, which is to say seeing an attack
> where none is taking place. The above is just a gentle, hopefully
> humorous dig at the number of posts you generate, not a monstrous
> assault on your soul. Please don't copy Arnie in having no sense of
> humour whatsoever.

Please don't copy Morein and try to pretend you would feel the same if it
were you as trhe subject of such a post.

[paul packer]

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:40:35 GMT, > wrote:


>> Mike, you're doing an Arny Krueger, which is to say seeing an attack
>> where none is taking place. The above is just a gentle, hopefully
>> humorous dig at the number of posts you generate, not a monstrous
>> assault on your soul. Please don't copy Arnie in having no sense of
>> humour whatsoever.
>
>Please don't copy Morein and try to pretend you would feel the same if it
>were you as trhe subject of such a post.

I've been the subject of such satire and laughed. Take it as an
example.