October 24th 05, 07:13 PM
Chevdo wrote:
> The Shakti Stones were defended vehemently in an editorial by
> reviewer Art Dudley in the November 2004 issue of Stereophile
> magazine.
Good grief, "Chevdo," it's hard keeping up with your mistakes
in this thread. No. Art Dudley did not "defend" the "Shakti
Stones," vehemently or otherwise, in his column in the
November 2004 issue of Stereophile (which you can read at
http://www.stereophile.com/artdudleylistening/1104listening/index1.html).
Instead, poked fun at James Randi (nee Randall Zwinge) by
issuing his own challenge and upping the ante from Randi's
"million dollars" to "a hundred billion zillion dollars."
Strangely, Randi has yet to accept this challenge. :-)
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
PS: Again, I have crossposted this response to r.a.o.
Please delete r.a.p. from the header when responding.
> The Shakti Stones were defended vehemently in an editorial by
> reviewer Art Dudley in the November 2004 issue of Stereophile
> magazine.
Good grief, "Chevdo," it's hard keeping up with your mistakes
in this thread. No. Art Dudley did not "defend" the "Shakti
Stones," vehemently or otherwise, in his column in the
November 2004 issue of Stereophile (which you can read at
http://www.stereophile.com/artdudleylistening/1104listening/index1.html).
Instead, poked fun at James Randi (nee Randall Zwinge) by
issuing his own challenge and upping the ante from Randi's
"million dollars" to "a hundred billion zillion dollars."
Strangely, Randi has yet to accept this challenge. :-)
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
PS: Again, I have crossposted this response to r.a.o.
Please delete r.a.p. from the header when responding.