ARNY!!!!

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

Hello there, Arny.

Remember posting this a few days ago?

-----

"The Devil" > wrote in message
news:pm73ov48g3llumqbdtsfcn7mp1ht6uc3k0@rdmzrnewst xt.nz
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:12:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>>> Research published recently discovered the worst place to store them
>>> is in the dark, Mr Computer Expert.
>>
>> Prove it! It would be genuinely interesting Graham if you weren't
>> lying your ass off this one time.

> Now what did I say to you, you stupid, disgusting, putrescent piece of
> **** leftover?

Some that comes out something like: "I, Graham am lying my ass off,
again".

> If anyone else would like a link to the research, feel free to email
> me. The only condition is that you don't tell Arnii.

<translation: Graham is caught lying, again. He was much more
successful
publishing his pedophile fantasies on RAO. Middius and Singh loved
'em. >

-----

Well, here is a link to the story. There is a link within the story to
the research.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/32593.html

Are you going to apologise now?

--
td

P.S. Well done on the lawsuit. I knew you'd come through for me.

P.P.S This is The Devil, by the way, just in case you were thinking of
an ignorance defense.

[Robert Morein]

"The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra" > wrote in message
news:55pdov4is2ce4mrqsskc6e0l1v6tp97q4t@rdmzrnewst xt.nz...
> Hello there, Arny.
>
> Remember posting this a few days ago?
>
> -----
>
> "The Devil" > wrote in message
> news:pm73ov48g3llumqbdtsfcn7mp1ht6uc3k0@rdmzrnewst xt.nz
> > On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:12:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> Research published recently discovered the worst place to store them
> >>> is in the dark, Mr Computer Expert.
> >>
> >> Prove it! It would be genuinely interesting Graham if you weren't
> >> lying your ass off this one time.
>
> > Now what did I say to you, you stupid, disgusting, putrescent piece of
> > **** leftover?
>
> Some that comes out something like: "I, Graham am lying my ass off,
> again".
>
> > If anyone else would like a link to the research, feel free to email
> > me. The only condition is that you don't tell Arnii.
>
> <translation: Graham is caught lying, again. He was much more
> successful
> publishing his pedophile fantasies on RAO. Middius and Singh loved
> 'em. >
>
> -----
>
> Well, here is a link to the story. There is a link within the story to
> the research.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/32593.html
>
> Are you going to apologise now?
>
The "Devil" is correct in that the article does appear to say this.
However, it appears to be an example of sloppy journalism.
The results are reasonable. But it's an incorrect inference to conclude that
dark storage is worse than light storage.
IMHO, the correct interpretation is that poor quality CDs can degrade
quickly even in the dark.

It is still an authoritative contradiction of Arny's ignorant sound-off on
the subject of CD brand selection.

[George M. Middius]

Bobo said:

> It is still an authoritative contradiction of Arny's ignorant sound-off on
> the subject of CD brand selection.

Did you notice that Obie has allowed Mr. **** to return to his good
graces? I assume you're still resisting the siren song of the sameness
religion. Maybe you need to see Dr. Phlox for some Kroo-radiation
blocker though. Just in case.

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Bobo said:
>
> > It is still an authoritative contradiction of Arny's ignorant sound-off
on
> > the subject of CD brand selection.
>
> Did you notice that Obie has allowed Mr. **** to return to his good
> graces? I assume you're still resisting the siren song of the sameness
> religion. Maybe you need to see Dr. Phlox for some Kroo-radiation
> blocker though. Just in case.
>
>
Us nihilists are immune.

[Lionel]

Robert Morein wrote:

> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>>Bobo said:
>>
>>
>>>It is still an authoritative contradiction of Arny's ignorant sound-off
>
> on
>
>>>the subject of CD brand selection.
>>
>>Did you notice that Obie has allowed Mr. **** to return to his good
>>graces? I assume you're still resisting the siren song of the sameness
>>religion. Maybe you need to see Dr. Phlox for some Kroo-radiation
>>blocker though. Just in case.
>>
>>
>
> Us nihilists are immune.
>
>
George crusade has no limit. Like a kamikaze he is ready to eat his
balls to fight Krueger. ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message


> The "Devil" is correct in that the article does appear to say this.

Only for sloppy readers. The lead-off sentence says:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/32593.html

"Keeping data CDs in the dark for two years isn't a good idea."

It doesn't say keeping data in the dark isn't a good idea, it says that
keeping it in the dark for two years isn't a good idea. Then the article
goes on to say something significantly different from that:

"According to the Dutch magazine PC Active some CD-Rs degrade in months,
even at room temperature without sunlight."

The word "some" is key. It says that these findings don't apply to all CDs,
but only some of them. Apparently some where some place there are CDs that
are so crappy that they can't be stored for as short as 2 years under good
conditions, without degrading unacceptably.

> However, it appears to be an example of sloppy journalism.

You got that right!

> The results are reasonable.

In the sense that some CDs are so crappy that even when stored in accordance
with accepted methodologies, they don't last two years.

> But it's an incorrect inference to
> conclude that dark storage is worse than light storage.

Agreed.

> IMHO, the correct interpretation is that poor quality CDs can degrade
> quickly even in the dark.

Agreed.

> It is still an authoritative contradiction of Arny's ignorant
> sound-off on the subject of CD brand selection.

Drop the word "ignorant", and I won't point out how much I had to beat on
you Bob, to get you to produce references that supported your claims.

[Robert Morein]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>
>
> > The "Devil" is correct in that the article does appear to say this.
>
> Only for sloppy readers. The lead-off sentence says:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/32593.html
>
> "Keeping data CDs in the dark for two years isn't a good idea."
>
> It doesn't say keeping data in the dark isn't a good idea, it says that
> keeping it in the dark for two years isn't a good idea. Then the article
> goes on to say something significantly different from that:
>
> "According to the Dutch magazine PC Active some CD-Rs degrade in months,
> even at room temperature without sunlight."
>
> The word "some" is key. It says that these findings don't apply to all
CDs,
> but only some of them. Apparently some where some place there are CDs that
> are so crappy that they can't be stored for as short as 2 years under good
> conditions, without degrading unacceptably.
>
> > However, it appears to be an example of sloppy journalism.
>
> You got that right!
>
> > The results are reasonable.
>
> In the sense that some CDs are so crappy that even when stored in
accordance
> with accepted methodologies, they don't last two years.
>
> > But it's an incorrect inference to
> > conclude that dark storage is worse than light storage.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > IMHO, the correct interpretation is that poor quality CDs can degrade
> > quickly even in the dark.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > It is still an authoritative contradiction of Arny's ignorant
> > sound-off on the subject of CD brand selection.
>
> Drop the word "ignorant", and I won't point out how much I had to beat on
> you Bob, to get you to produce references that supported your claims.
>
The word "ignorant" was very appropriately used on that occasion.
You, as a master of the debating trade, implicitly shifted the burden of
proof to your challenger, a devious and unjustified thing.

You made a statement, in your typical pontifical fashion, and got shot down.
Rather than openly admit your mistake (which would have actually made you
look good), you chose to attack your correctors.
Your mistake is very obvious to everyone except you. You share this personal
characteristic with Singh.

[dave weil]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:54:04 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>The word "some" is key. It says that these findings don't apply to all CDs,
>but only some of them.

<s******>

[dave weil]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:04:58 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>You made a statement, in your typical pontifical fashion, and got shot down.
>Rather than openly admit your mistake (which would have actually made you
>look good), you chose to attack your correctors.

Well, yes. Arnold rarely admits his mistakes. Were you expecting
otherwise? Note the gobbledy gook that he spouted to try and obsfucate
the fact that he was wrong.

Just like the mistake he made when he talked about "prepackaged sets"
of Silver Flute drivers. Note the notable silence on this issue, note.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
You share this personal
> characteristic with Singh.
>

That's a two point penalty for a low blow.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[George M. Middius]

Sockpuppet Yustabe said:

> > You share this personal characteristic with Singh.

> That's a two point penalty for a low blow.

Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?

[Lionel]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>
>
>>>You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>
>
>
>>That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>
>
> Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>
>
Please a top 10 Middius !
And as usual don't be modest. ;-)

[trotsky]

Robert Morein wrote:

> Your mistake is very obvious to everyone except you. You share this personal
> characteristic with Singh.


Now that's just weird. I was right and you were wrong about my
speakers, if dave's opinion is to be trusted. I assume you were
planning to apologize. Can you hurry up, weiner?

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:04:58 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>You made a statement, in your typical pontifical fashion, and got shot down.
>>Rather than openly admit your mistake (which would have actually made you
>>look good), you chose to attack your correctors.
>
>
> Well, yes. Arnold rarely admits his mistakes. Were you expecting
> otherwise? Note the gobbledy gook that he spouted to try and obsfucate
> the fact that he was wrong.
>
> Just like the mistake he made when he talked about "prepackaged sets"
> of Silver Flute drivers. Note the notable silence on this issue, note.



"Devil's", too.

[Robert Morein]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
>
> > Your mistake is very obvious to everyone except you. You share this
personal
> > characteristic with Singh.
>
>
> Now that's just weird. I was right and you were wrong about my
> speakers, if dave's opinion is to be trusted. I assume you were
> planning to apologize. Can you hurry up, weiner?
>
Dave's review was cut short by your interference, and rightfully so.

[Bruce J. Richman]

George M. Middius wrote:


>Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>
>> > You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>
>> That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>
>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack of
credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
Of course, they also both exhibit a lack of insight which has never been
matched on RAO. Whether they share the same paranoid conspiracy theories or
listen to the same voices telling them how to act and think is harder to tell.




Bruce J. Richman

[Arny Krueger]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message


<writing about Krueger and Middius>

> Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits.
> Lack of credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with
> reality, delusional thinking, and many more flaws.

> Of course, they also both exhibit a lack of insight which has never
> been matched on RAO. Whether they share the same paranoid conspiracy
> theories or listen to the same voices telling them how to act and
> think is harder to tell.

One thing about Richman, his reality has a lot to do with which way the wind
blows. Now that Middius is falling out of favor, Richman's eyes have been
magically opened!

[Robert Morein]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>
> >Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
> >
> >> > You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
> >
> >> That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
> >
> >Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
> >
>
> Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack
of
> credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
> delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
> Of course, they also both exhibit a lack of insight which has never been
> matched on RAO. Whether they share the same paranoid conspiracy theories
or
> listen to the same voices telling them how to act and think is harder to
tell.
>
The similarities are marked. The principle difference, IMHO, is that Krueger
has a messiah complex, while Gregipus is a narcissist.
Each has a disconnect with what other people think about them, and their
activities.
In each case, the victim's self-esteem is confused with nonexistent esteem
they imagine to be given by others.

These individuals are extremely egotistical and extremely self-centered.
Their defects are made visible by a lack of social poise.

Krueger is more irritating because the messiah complex is a more powerful
social irritant than narcissism. If Gregipus wants to masturbate in front of
a mirror all day, it hardly bothers us. It's only when he posts "look how
beautiful I am to r.a.o." that he becomes a subject of amusement. Gregipus
also would like to be an irritant, because it makes him feel intelligent,
but he lacks Krueger's messianic desire to destroy other people's forms of
discrimination and appreciation.

[Lionel]

Robert Morein wrote:
> "Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>George M. Middius wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>>>
>>>>That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>>>
>>>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>>>
>>
>>Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack
>
> of
>
>>credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
>>delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
>>Of course, they also both exhibit a lack of insight which has never been
>>matched on RAO. Whether they share the same paranoid conspiracy theories
>
> or
>
>>listen to the same voices telling them how to act and think is harder to
>
> tell.
>
> The similarities are marked. The principle difference, IMHO, is that Krueger
> has a messiah complex, while Gregipus is a narcissist.
> Each has a disconnect with what other people think about them, and their
> activities.
> In each case, the victim's self-esteem is confused with nonexistent esteem
> they imagine to be given by others.
>
> These individuals are extremely egotistical and extremely self-centered.
> Their defects are made visible by a lack of social poise.
>
> Krueger is more irritating because the messiah complex is a more powerful
> social irritant than narcissism. If Gregipus wants to masturbate in front of
> a mirror all day, it hardly bothers us. It's only when he posts "look how
> beautiful I am to r.a.o." that he becomes a subject of amusement. Gregipus
> also would like to be an irritant, because it makes him feel intelligent,
> but he lacks Krueger's messianic desire to destroy other people's forms of
> discrimination and appreciation.
>
>
Who is psychologist ? ;-)

[George M. Middius]

Bobo said:

> Krueger is more irritating because the messiah complex is a more powerful
> social irritant than narcissism. If Gregipus wants to masturbate in front of
> a mirror all day, it hardly bothers us.

If you ever say "Mommy****er", Krooger will accuse you of being my
sockpuppet. Or vice-versa.

[Robert Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Robert Morein wrote:
> > "Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>George M. Middius wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
> >>>
> >>>>That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
> >>>
> >>>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
> >>>
> >>
> >>Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack
> >
> > of
> >
> >>credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
> >>delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
> >>Of course, they also both exhibit a lack of insight which has never been
> >>matched on RAO. Whether they share the same paranoid conspiracy
theories
> >
> > or
> >
> >>listen to the same voices telling them how to act and think is harder to
> >
> > tell.
> >
> > The similarities are marked. The principle difference, IMHO, is that
Krueger
> > has a messiah complex, while Gregipus is a narcissist.
> > Each has a disconnect with what other people think about them, and their
> > activities.
> > In each case, the victim's self-esteem is confused with nonexistent
esteem
> > they imagine to be given by others.
> >
> > These individuals are extremely egotistical and extremely self-centered.
> > Their defects are made visible by a lack of social poise.
> >
> > Krueger is more irritating because the messiah complex is a more
powerful
> > social irritant than narcissism. If Gregipus wants to masturbate in
front of
> > a mirror all day, it hardly bothers us. It's only when he posts "look
how
> > beautiful I am to r.a.o." that he becomes a subject of amusement.
Gregipus
> > also would like to be an irritant, because it makes him feel
intelligent,
> > but he lacks Krueger's messianic desire to destroy other people's forms
of
> > discrimination and appreciation.
> >
> >
> Who is psychologist ? ;-)
>
Half of us are. We've become distracted from subjects of importance, like
crossover distortion :).

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>
> > > You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>
> > That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>
> Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>

Absolutuely
Not even close




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[George M. Middius]

Sockpuppet Yustabe said:

> > Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?

> Absolutuely
> Not even close

It certainly is close.

[Bruce J. Richman]

Krueger's reading comprehension problems are displayed for RAO as follows:


>"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message

>
><writing about Krueger and Middius>
>

Note that Krueger has deliberately deleted and distorted the post to which I
responded - which had NOTHING TO DO WITH similarities between Krueger and
Middius. What I had to say was as follows:

Message-id: >

George M. Middius wrote:


>Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>
>> > You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>
>> That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>
>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack of
credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
Of course, they also both exhibit a lack of insight which has never been
matched on RAO. Whether they share the same paranoid conspiracy theories or
listen to the same voices telling them how to act and think is harder to tell.




Bruce J. Richman
------------------------------------------------------------

Note that the compulsive liar and fraudulent poster, Krueger, tried to delete
the above post to create the phony and false impression that I was talking
about him and Middius. As the above post clearly, illustrates, I was pointing
out the many obvious similarities between Krueger and Singh.














>> Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits.
>> Lack of credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with
>> reality, delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
>
>> Of course, they also both exhibit a lack of insight which has never
>> been matched on RAO. Whether they share the same paranoid conspiracy
>> theories or listen to the same voices telling them how to act and
>> think is harder to tell.
>
>One thing about Richman, his reality has a lot to do with which way the wind
>blows. Now that Middius is falling out of favor, Richman's eyes have been
>magically opened!
>

Krueger can always be counted on, as I've demonstrated above, to try and
misrepresent what I and many other people have actually written. Since he's
tried to build his career on fabrications and deliberate distortions of
whatever people have said, it's not surprising that his pathetiuc attempts to
fool the public are so quickly and easily exposed. When it comes to lack of
contact with reality, the above set of lies from Krueger is just the latest in
a long history of documented examples.



Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

Robert Morein wrote:


>Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
>> George M. Middius wrote:
>>
>>
>> >Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>> >
>> >> > You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>> >
>> >> That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>> >
>> >Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack
>of
>> credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
>> delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
>> Of course, they also both exhibit a lack of insight which has never been
>> matched on RAO. Whether they share the same paranoid conspiracy theories
>or
>> listen to the same voices telling them how to act and think is harder to
>tell.
>>
>The similarities are marked. The principle difference, IMHO, is that Krueger
>has a messiah complex, while Gregipus is a narcissist.

Yes, the similarities are quite striking. Of course, they both think their
"mission" in life is to impart their undisputed, unverifiable "knowledge" to
all the undereducated subjectivist hobbyists who have the audacity to engage in
individual preferences when auditioning products. The level of arrogance
exhibited by both is pretty despicable and laughable.


>Each has a disconnect with what other people think about them, and their
>activities.

For sure.


>In each case, the victim's self-esteem is confused with nonexistent esteem
>they imagine to be given by others.
>
>These individuals are extremely egotistical and extremely self-centered.
>Their defects are made visible by a lack of social poise.
>
>Krueger is more irritating because the messiah complex is a more powerful
>social irritant than narcissism. If Gregipus wants to masturbate in front of
>a mirror all day, it hardly bothers us. It's only when he posts "look how
>beautiful I am to r.a.o." that he becomes a subject of amusement. Gregipus
>also would like to be an irritant, because it makes him feel intelligent,
>but he lacks Krueger's messianic desire to destroy other people's forms of
>discrimination and appreciation.
>
>
>



Bruce J. Richman

[George M. Middius]

Bruce J. Richman said:

> >The similarities are marked. The principle difference, IMHO, is that Krueger
> >has a messiah complex, while Gregipus is a narcissist.

> Yes, the similarities are quite striking. Of course, they both think their
> "mission" in life is to impart their undisputed, unverifiable "knowledge" to
> all the undereducated subjectivist hobbyists who have the audacity to engage in
> individual preferences when auditioning products. The level of arrogance
> exhibited by both is pretty despicable and laughable.

Indeed it is.

One point you might want to consider. Admittedly, comparing those two
is like discussing the relative merits of two kinds of mildew growing
on the shower curtain. Krooger indeed wants to believe himself the
great audio savior. His need for approbation is so great that he has
convinced himself he wins all of his "audio debates". Furthermore, his
frequent claims about the reasons for his presence on RAO are utterly
fatuous. Mr. **** claims to encourage "audio content" -- a total lie.
He also fraudulently claims that he "hangs around" RAO to help
newbies, even though he has condemned this group as hopeless. Nobody
is quicker than Krooger to attack a newbie for a "wrong opinion". The
levels of delusion Turdy has built up to protect his fantasies about
himself are both repugnant and perversely fascinating.

Gregipus, however, doesn't even pretend to want to help others. Notice
how he goes out of his way to pick fights, even more aggressively than
Krooger does? Unlike Krooger, Gregipus doesn't want recognition for
his supposed generosity. What he wants is to be acknowledged by one
and all as the world's foremost authority on audio. He believes he
knows all there is to know about marketing by virtue of having toiled
on the front lines of audio retail. He believes he knows all there is
to know about designing speakers by virtue of his alleged E.E. degree
and his one week of research. He believes he has an unsurpassed
hearing acuity. Far from using the wondrous knowledge he believes he
possesses for the betterment of others, he wants to use it as a club.

So I agree with Bobo. Gregipus is far more narcissistic (albeit
delusionally) than he is messianic.

[Lionel]

Le Sat, 11 Oct 2003 01:40:45 -0400, George M. Middius
>,
> a écrit :

>
>
>Bruce J. Richman said:
>
>> >The similarities are marked. The principle difference, IMHO, is that Krueger
>> >has a messiah complex, while Gregipus is a narcissist.
>
>> Yes, the similarities are quite striking. Of course, they both think their
>> "mission" in life is to impart their undisputed, unverifiable "knowledge" to
>> all the undereducated subjectivist hobbyists who have the audacity to engage in
>> individual preferences when auditioning products. The level of arrogance
>> exhibited by both is pretty despicable and laughable.
>
>Indeed it is.
>
>One point you might want to consider. Admittedly, comparing those two
>is like discussing the relative merits of two kinds of mildew growing
>on the shower curtain. Krooger indeed wants to believe himself the
>great audio savior. His need for approbation is so great that he has
>convinced himself he wins all of his "audio debates". Furthermore, his
>frequent claims about the reasons for his presence on RAO are utterly
>fatuous. Mr. **** claims to encourage "audio content" -- a total lie.
>He also fraudulently claims that he "hangs around" RAO to help
>newbies, even though he has condemned this group as hopeless. Nobody
>is quicker than Krooger to attack a newbie for a "wrong opinion". The
>levels of delusion Turdy has built up to protect his fantasies about
>himself are both repugnant and perversely fascinating.
>
>Gregipus, however, doesn't even pretend to want to help others. Notice
>how he goes out of his way to pick fights, even more aggressively than
>Krooger does? Unlike Krooger, Gregipus doesn't want recognition for
>his supposed generosity. What he wants is to be acknowledged by one
>and all as the world's foremost authority on audio. He believes he
>knows all there is to know about marketing by virtue of having toiled
>on the front lines of audio retail. He believes he knows all there is
>to know about designing speakers by virtue of his alleged E.E. degree
>and his one week of research. He believes he has an unsurpassed
>hearing acuity. Far from using the wondrous knowledge he believes he
>possesses for the betterment of others, he wants to use it as a club.
>
>So I agree with Bobo. Gregipus is far more narcissistic (albeit
>delusionally) than he is messianic.
>

I'm totally agree with you George, you intelligently add this
interesting point to the debate.
Now I better understand that they both use RAO as an exutory to their
psychopathy.
....But your fascinating magistral course doesn't bring any information
and/or explanations about the reasons of your presence on RAO neither
gives us few clues about your potential (hypothetical ?) added value
the audio debate in general.
I know that you consider that I haven't more intelligence and witness
than a sheep but I have been involuntarily attracted by your
incommensurable charism and now you have to take care of me as a
disciple.
"The shepherd loves his ewes..."

Thank you for your interest.
Lionel

[trotsky]

Robert Morein wrote:
> "trotsky" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>>Robert Morein wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Your mistake is very obvious to everyone except you. You share this
>>
> personal
>
>>>characteristic with Singh.
>>
>>
>>Now that's just weird. I was right and you were wrong about my
>>speakers, if dave's opinion is to be trusted. I assume you were
>>planning to apologize. Can you hurry up, weiner?
>>
>
> Dave's review was cut short by your interference, and rightfully so.


Oh, good, at least I was right about something! (?) Have you been
hitting the crack pipe again, Bob?

[trotsky]

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>
>
>>Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>>
>>
>>>>You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>>>
>>>That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>>
>>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack of
> credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
> delusional thinking, and many more flaws.



That's cool, now do George. Or admit you're a fraud--your choice.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>
>
>>>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>>
>
>
>>Absolutuely
>>Not even close
>
>
> It certainly is close.


You must really be desperate, to put Art on the spot in that way.
Didn't really work out for you, though.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Bruce J. Richman said:
>
>
>>>The similarities are marked. The principle difference, IMHO, is that Krueger
>>>has a messiah complex, while Gregipus is a narcissist.
>>
>
>
>>Yes, the similarities are quite striking. Of course, they both think their
>>"mission" in life is to impart their undisputed, unverifiable "knowledge" to
>>all the undereducated subjectivist hobbyists who have the audacity to engage in
>>individual preferences when auditioning products. The level of arrogance
>>exhibited by both is pretty despicable and laughable.
>
>
> Indeed it is.
>
> One point you might want to consider. Admittedly, comparing those two
> is like discussing the relative merits of two kinds of mildew growing
> on the shower curtain. Krooger indeed wants to believe himself the
> great audio savior. His need for approbation is so great that he has
> convinced himself he wins all of his "audio debates". Furthermore, his
> frequent claims about the reasons for his presence on RAO are utterly
> fatuous. Mr. **** claims to encourage "audio content" -- a total lie.
> He also fraudulently claims that he "hangs around" RAO to help
> newbies, even though he has condemned this group as hopeless. Nobody
> is quicker than Krooger to attack a newbie for a "wrong opinion". The
> levels of delusion Turdy has built up to protect his fantasies about
> himself are both repugnant and perversely fascinating.
>
> Gregipus, however, doesn't even pretend to want to help others.


Right, that's why I explained the truth on the subwoofer question. You
must really hate audio, George. Might go hand in hand with the
self-loathing, I guess.

[George M. Middius]

Lionella la Salope said:

> I'm totally agree with you George, you intelligently add this
> interesting point to the debate.

You're still a pinhead sockpuppet.

> exutory

You need a better dictionary.

[George M. Middius]

trotsky said:

> >>>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?

> >>Absolutuely
> >>Not even close

> > It certainly is close.

> You must really be desperate, to put Art on the spot in that way.

Desperate? For what?

> Didn't really work out for you, though.

What are you babbling about?

[George M. Middius]

trotsky said:

> > Gregipus, however, doesn't even pretend to want to help others.

> Right, that's why I explained the truth on the subwoofer question.

It is exactly right. Your "explanation" had nothing to do with
altruism or being helpful, and everything to do with your raging
inferiority complex.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> trotsky said:
>
>
>>>Gregipus, however, doesn't even pretend to want to help others.
>>
>
>
>>Right, that's why I explained the truth on the subwoofer question.
>
>
> It is exactly right. Your "explanation" had nothing to do with
> altruism or being helpful, and everything to do with your raging
> inferiority complex.


George, I apologize. I baited you into talking about an audio topic so
you could make an ass of yourself.

[Bruce J. Richman]

trotsky wrote:


>ruce J. Richman wrote:
>> George M. Middius wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>>>>
>>>>That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>>>
>>>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack of
>> credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
>> delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
>
>
>
>That's cool, now do George. Or admit you're a fraud--your choice.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Lying through your teeth as usual. You are such a waste of subhuman matter.
Idiots like you deserve to be pitied as much as blamed.



Bruce J. Richman

[Lionel]

George M. Middius wrote:

>
> Lionella la Salope said:
>
>
>>I'm totally agree with you George, you intelligently add this
>>interesting point to the debate.
>
> You're still a pinhead sockpuppet.
>
Your a coward George. You're still quoting like a pig.
:o)

>
>>exutory
>
>
> You need a better dictionary.
>

Come from the french "exutoire"
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=exutory
Ex*u"to*ry (?), n. [Cf. F. exutoire. See Exuve.] (Med.) An issue.

* Issue :
# noun: an opening that permits escape or release (Example: "The
canyon had only one issue")

Always happy to help you Middious.

[George M. Middius]

Lionella la Salope said:

> > You're still a pinhead sockpuppet.

> Your[sic] a coward George. You're still quoting like a pig[sic].

How, exactly, do pigs quote?


> >>exutory

> > You need a better dictionary.

> Come from the french "exutoire"
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=exutory
> Ex*u"to*ry (?), n. [Cf. F. exutoire. See Exuve.] (Med.) An issue.
>
> * Issue :
> # noun: an opening that permits escape or release (Example: "The
> canyon had only one issue")

You have successfully missed the point for about the 500th time.
Well done!


> Always happy to help you Middious.

I don't need any help -- you show the group what a ninny you are
with or without replies from me.

[Lionel]

George M. Middius wrote:

>
> Lionella la Salope said:
>
>
>>>You're still a pinhead sockpuppet.
>
>
>>Your[sic] a coward George. You're still quoting like a pig[sic].
>
>
> How, exactly, do pigs quote?
>
>
>
>>>>exutory
>
>
>>>You need a better dictionary.
>
>
>
>>Come from the french "exutoire"
>>http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=exutory
>>Ex*u"to*ry (?), n. [Cf. F. exutoire. See Exuve.] (Med.) An issue.
>>
>>* Issue :
>># noun: an opening that permits escape or release (Example: "The
>>canyon had only one issue")
>
>
> You have successfully missed the point for about the 500th time.
> Well done!
>
>
It's not a problem for me, just for you.
You miss an occasion of shut up for the 50000th time.

(1)EXUTOIRE. n. m. T. de Médecine. Ulcère artificiel qui sert de dérivatif.
Il signifie figurément Dérivation donnée à ce qui gêne, embarrasse.
Cette discussion a servi d'exutoire à sa bile. Les lotissements dans la
banlieue de Paris sont une sorte d'exutoire du trop-plein de la population.

Middius you have proven many times that you have a lot of difficulties
to understand French... But if you could translate the above you will
see what you have missed. (lol!)
Are you speaking an other language than american-english ?
What is your level of study ?
>
>>Always happy to help you Middious.
>
>
> I don't need any help -- you show the group what a ninny you are
> with or without replies from me.
>
It's the big difference between you and me : I haven't anything to prove
to the group... This is just a way to barflying at low cost. ;-)

[Lionel]

Lionel wrote:

> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>>
>> Lionella la Salope said:
>>
>>
>>>> You're still a pinhead sockpuppet.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Your[sic] a coward George. You're still quoting like a pig[sic].
>>
>>
>>
>> How, exactly, do pigs quote?
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> exutory
>>
>>
>>
>>>> You need a better dictionary.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Come from the french "exutoire"
>>> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=exutory
>>> Ex*u"to*ry (?), n. [Cf. F. exutoire. See Exuve.] (Med.) An issue.
>>>
>>> * Issue :
>>> # noun: an opening that permits escape or release (Example: "The
>>> canyon had only one issue")
>>
>>
>>
>> You have successfully missed the point for about the 500th time.
>> Well done!
>>
>>
> It's not a problem for me, just for you.
> You miss an occasion of shut up for the 50000th time.
>
> (1)EXUTOIRE. n. m. T. de Médecine. Ulcère artificiel qui sert de dérivatif.
> Il signifie figurément Dérivation donnée à ce qui gêne, embarrasse.
> Cette discussion a servi d'exutoire à sa bile. Les lotissements dans la
> banlieue de Paris sont une sorte d'exutoire du trop-plein de la population.
>
> Middius you have proven many times that you have a lot of difficulties
> to understand French... But if you could translate the above you will
> see what you have missed. (lol!)
> Are you speaking an other language than american-english ?
> What is your level of study ?
>
>>
>>> Always happy to help you Middious.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't need any help -- you show the group what a ninny you are
>> with or without replies from me.
>>
> It's the big difference between you and me : I haven't anything to prove
> to the group... This is just a way to barflying at low cost. ;-)
>
>
Ooops if I forget you will not understand :

Barfly (1987) is the only film written by American author and poet
Charles Bukowski, an autobiography of the part of his life spent
drinking in Los Angeles.

To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion... Just for
you Georgetta <SMACK!>

[MiNE 109]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion

Looks more like an adverb...

Stephen

[George M. Middius]

MiNE 109 said:

> > To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion

> Looks more like an adverb...

Upchuckingly so. If you read enough of Lionella's posts, you feel
like you just ate some bad fish.

[Lionel]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> MiNE 109 said:
>
>
>>>To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion
>
>
>>Looks more like an adverb...
>
>
> Upchuckingly so. If you read enough of Lionella's posts, you feel
> like you just ate some bad fish.
>
>
This has nothing to do with what I use to write but to your cavities.
You have 2 solutions :
- change your toothpaste for a stronger one
- get a rendez-vous from your dentist if you can pay the bill.

[Lionel]

MiNE 109 wrote:

> In article >,
> Lionel > wrote:
>
>
>>To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion
>
>
> Looks more like an adverb...
>
> Stephen

You are right Sir.

I wrote :
"This is just a way to barflying at low cost"
In this case this is an adverb

And I guess that the correct sentence should be :
"This is just a way to barfly at low cost"
In this case this is a verb.

You are the specialist I let you decide if one of the above is correct.

[Robert Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> MiNE 109 wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > Lionel > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion
> >
> >
> > Looks more like an adverb...
> >
> > Stephen
>
> You are right Sir.
>
> I wrote :
> "This is just a way to barflying at low cost"
> In this case this is an adverb
>
> And I guess that the correct sentence should be :
> "This is just a way to barfly at low cost"
> In this case this is a verb.
>
> You are the specialist I let you decide if one of the above is correct.
>
I choose verb. It's slick.

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>
> > > Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>
> > Absolutuely
> > Not even close
>
> It certainly is close.
>
But look, Gregipussy isn't putting high-end audio in danger, any more than
any other huckster driving a white van.

Krueger is like a third-world tinpot dictator.

[Lionel]

Robert Morein wrote:

> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>MiNE 109 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article >,
>>> Lionel > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion
>>>
>>>
>>>Looks more like an adverb...
>>>
>>>Stephen
>>
>>You are right Sir.
>>
>>I wrote :
>>"This is just a way to barflying at low cost"
>>In this case this is an adverb
>>
>>And I guess that the correct sentence should be :
>>"This is just a way to barfly at low cost"
>>In this case this is a verb.
>>
>>You are the specialist I let you decide if one of the above is correct.
>>
>
> I choose verb. It's slick.
>
>
Ok nice so I open an other beer. Prosit !

[Arny Krueger]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message

> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>>
>>>> Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>>
>>> Absolutuely
>>> Not even close
>>
>> It certainly is close.
>>
> But look, Gregipussy isn't putting high-end audio in danger, any more
> than any other huckster driving a white van.
>
> Krueger is like a third-world tinpot dictator.

Note, it's another forgery from the Aussie fruitcake.

Path:
news5.aus1.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nn tp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.
giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POS TED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:13:53 -0500
Reply-To: "Robert Morein" >
From: "Robert Morein" >
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
References: >
> >
> >
> >
>
Subject: Re: ARNY!!!!
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 18:13:52 -0400
Organization: nowhere.com
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: >
Lines: 23
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.83.128.158
X-Trace:
sv3-CnPKs6oMhN+NDOV8AELJZnEX0m2p7ZNjqGaUmMOuZbPv176eqg GYXHd+qOQwU+UCpUsvr+bB
HP5OlCl!HWBFsUeDFmdwbguCI2DarRHVKuJ/O0qOJYceCAxyaveDuzNT303zvM/DN7mxaw==
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:686068

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> > It certainly is close.
> >
> But look, Gregipussy isn't putting high-end audio in danger, any more than
> any other huckster driving a white van.

Maybe even less than Ferstler? ;-)

I like your variation on his nickname.

> Krueger is like a third-world tinpot dictator.

Word! Except you have to work in "wannabe" someplace.

[MiNE 109]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> MiNE 109 wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > Lionel > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion
> >
> >
> > Looks more like an adverb...
> >
> > Stephen
>
> You are right Sir.
>
> I wrote :
> "This is just a way to barflying at low cost"
> In this case this is an adverb
>
> And I guess that the correct sentence should be :
> "This is just a way to barfly at low cost"
> In this case this is a verb.
>
> You are the specialist I let you decide if one of the above is correct.

I would prefer not to argue with a Frank Stallone fanatic.

Stephen

[Robert Morein]

It's a forgery?

Please explain where the header differs from my other headers. As far as I
can tell, McCarty is posting from sonicnews.net. When I post through
comcast, the actual newsgroup provider is Giganews, who do it under contract
to Comcast.

BTW, while I stand behind my comments on your behavior in this group, I
restrict the meaning to your Usenet behavior. You are a Usenet nut -- that's
the extent of my meaning, because it's the only way I know you. You're
probably as thick as Trotsky, but you both need a usenet personality
makeover.

You have absolutely no comprehension of grace under fire.

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>
> > "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >>
> >>
> >> Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
> >>
> >>>> Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
> >>
> >>> Absolutuely
> >>> Not even close
> >>
> >> It certainly is close.
> >>
> > But look, Gregipussy isn't putting high-end audio in danger, any more
> > than any other huckster driving a white van.
> >
> > Krueger is like a third-world tinpot dictator.
>
> Note, it's another forgery from the Aussie fruitcake.
>
> Path:
>
news5.aus1.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nn tp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.
> giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POS TED!not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:13:53 -0500
> Reply-To: "Robert Morein" >
> From: "Robert Morein" >
> Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
> References: >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> Subject: Re: ARNY!!!!
> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 18:13:52 -0400
> Organization: nowhere.com
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> Message-ID: >
> Lines: 23
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.83.128.158
> X-Trace:
>
sv3-CnPKs6oMhN+NDOV8AELJZnEX0m2p7ZNjqGaUmMOuZbPv176eqg GYXHd+qOQwU+UCpUsvr+bB
> HP5OlCl!HWBFsUeDFmdwbguCI2DarRHVKuJ/O0qOJYceCAxyaveDuzNT303zvM/DN7mxaw==
> X-Complaints-To:
> X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint
> properly
> X-Postfilter: 1.1
> Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.opinion:686068
>
>
>
>

[Arny Krueger]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message

> It's a forgery?
>
> Please explain where the header differs from my other headers. As far
> as I can tell, McCarty is posting from sonicnews.net. When I post
> through comcast, the actual newsgroup provider is Giganews, who do it
> under contract to Comcast.

My error.

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:

> You have absolutely no comprehension of grace under fire.

Nor of how to read a Usenet post's header. Two pieces of information
point to genuineness:



and

NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.83.128.158

I believe it may be possible to configure some newsreaders to show a
false domain in the message ID. However, to forge an NNTP host's IP
address requires serious hacking skill.

Furthermore, common sense indicates, from the actual message, that it
was not a forgery, or at least not one by Bwian McLardass. But who
ever expected ****-for-Brains to possess an ounce of common sense?

[Robert Morein]

On 10/12/03 11:16 AM, in article , "Arny
Krueger" > wrote:

> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>
>> It's a forgery?
>>
>> Please explain where the header differs from my other headers. As far
>> as I can tell, McCarty is posting from sonicnews.net. When I post
>> through comcast, the actual newsgroup provider is Giganews, who do it
>> under contract to Comcast.
>
> My error.

Just the latest in a lifetime of errors.

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:

> > My error.
>
> Just the latest in a lifetime of errors.

No way Kroo**** said that. Must be an impersonator.

[Arny Krueger]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
ws.com

> On 10/12/03 11:16 AM, in article ,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>>
>>> It's a forgery?

>>> Please explain where the header differs from my other headers. As
>>> far as I can tell, McCarty is posting from sonicnews.net. When I
>>> post through comcast, the actual newsgroup provider is Giganews,
>>> who do it under contract to Comcast.

>> My error.

> Just the latest in a lifetime of errors.

So what? Show me someone who never made a mistake and I'll show you someone
who had one heck of a boring, unproductive life. Even worse are the people
who only think they've made no mistakes...

"Nothing ventured, nothing gained."

[Robert Morein]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ws.com
>
> > On 10/12/03 11:16 AM, in article ,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> It's a forgery?
>
> >>> Please explain where the header differs from my other headers. As
> >>> far as I can tell, McCarty is posting from sonicnews.net. When I
> >>> post through comcast, the actual newsgroup provider is Giganews,
> >>> who do it under contract to Comcast.
>
> >> My error.
>
> > Just the latest in a lifetime of errors.
>
> So what? Show me someone who never made a mistake and I'll show you
someone
> who had one heck of a boring, unproductive life. Even worse are the people
> who only think they've made no mistakes...
>
> "Nothing ventured, nothing gained."
>
Now if you take a look at THAT header, you'll see it came from Sonicnews.
McCarty is very active tonight.

I make no judgement as to what you've done with your lifetime.

As an aside, I was very impressed with your open-mindedness toward aetheism.

And I happen to agree with your reply.

[Robert Morein]

On 10/12/03 12:57 PM, in article , "Arny
Krueger" > wrote:

> So what? Show me someone who never made a mistake and I'll show you someone
> who had one heck of a boring, unproductive life. Even worse are the people
> who only think they've made no mistakes...


Have you read the facts of my life? Then tell me, which am I?


--


http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/ledgerenquirer/news/4853918.htm

> Doctoral student takes intellectual property case to Supreme Court
> By L. STUART DITZEN
> Philadelphia Inquirer
>
> PHILADELPHIA -Even the professors who dismissed him from a doctoral program
> at Drexel University agreed that Robert Morein was uncommonly smart.
>
> They apparently didn't realize that he was uncommonly stubborn too - so much
> so that he would mount a court fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court
> to challenge his dismissal.

The Supremes have already rejected this appeal, btw.
>
> "It's a personality trait I have - I'm a tenacious guy," said Morein, a
> pleasantly eccentric man regarded by friends as an inventive genius. "And we
> do come to a larger issue here."

An "inventive genius" that has never invented anything. And hardly
"pleasantly" eccentric.

> A five-year legal battle between this unusual ex-student and one of
> Philadelphia's premier educational institutions has gone largely unnoticed
> by the media and the public.

Because no one gives a **** about a 50 year old loser.
>
> But it has been the subject of much attention in academia.
>
> Drexel says it dismissed Morein in 1995 because he failed, after eight
> years, to complete a thesis required for a doctorate in electrical and
> computer engineering.

Not to mention the 12 years it took him to get thru high school!
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

>
> Morein, 50, of Dresher, Pa., contends that he was dismissed only after his
> thesis adviser "appropriated" an innovative idea Morein had developed in a
> rarefied area of thought called "estimation theory" and arranged to have it
> patented.

A contention rejected by three courts. From a 50 YEAR OLD that has
done NOTHING PRODUCTIVE with his life.

>
> In February 2000, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Esther R. Sylvester
> ruled that Morein's adviser indeed had taken his idea.

An idea that was worth nothing, because it didn't work. Just like
Robert Morein, who has never worked a day in his life.

>
> Sylvester held that Morein had been unjustly dismissed and she ordered
> Drexel to reinstate him or refund his tuition.

Funnily enough, Drexel AGREED to reinstate Morein, who rejected the
offer because he knew he was and IS a failed loser. Spending daddy's
money to cover up his lack of productivity.
>
> That brought roars of protest from the lions of academia. There is a long
> tradition in America of noninterference by the courts in academic decisions.
>
> Backed by every major university in Pennsylvania and organizations
> representing thousands of others around the country, Drexel appealed to the
> state Superior Court.
>
> The appellate court, by a 2-1 vote, reversed Sylvester in June 2001 and
> restored the status quo. Morein was, once again, out at Drexel. And the
> time-honored axiom that courts ought to keep their noses out of academic
> affairs was reasserted.
>
> The state Supreme Court declined to review the case and, in an ordinary
> litigation, that would have been the end of it.
>
> But Morein, in a quixotic gesture that goes steeply against the odds, has
> asked the highest court in the land to give him a hearing.

Daddy throws more money down the crapper.

> His attorney, Faye Riva Cohen, said the Supreme Court appeal is important
> even if it fails because it raises the issue of whether a university has a
> right to lay claim to a student's ideas - or intellectual property - without
> compensation.
>
> "Any time you are in a Ph.D. program, you are a serf, you are a slave," said
> Cohen. Morein "is concerned not only for himself. He feels that what
> happened to him is pretty common."

It's called HIGHER EDUCATION, honey. The students aren't in charge,
the UNIVERSITY and PROFESSORS are.


> Drexel's attorney, Neil J. Hamburg, called Morein's appeal - and his claim
> that his idea was stolen - "preposterous."
>
> "I will eat my shoe if the Supreme Court hears this case," declared Hamburg.
> "We're not even going to file a response. He is a brilliant guy, but his
> intelligence should be used for the advancement of society rather than
> pursuing self-destructive litigation."

No **** sherlock.

> The litigation began in 1997, when Morein sued Drexel claiming that a
> committee of professors had dumped him after he accused his faculty adviser,
> Paul Kalata, of appropriating his idea.
>
> His concept was considered to have potential value for businesses in
> minutely measuring the internal functions of machines, industrial processes
> and electronic systems.
>
> The field of "estimation theory" is one in which scientists attempt to
> calculate what they cannot plainly observe, such as the inside workings of a
> nuclear plant or a computer.

My estimation theory? There is NO brain at work inside the head of
Robert Morein, only sawdust.

>
> Prior to Morein's dismissal, Drexel looked into his complaint against Kalata
> and concluded that the associate professor had done nothing wrong. Kalata,
> through a university lawyer, declined to comment.
>
> At a nonjury trial before Sylvester in 1999, Morein testified that Kalata in
> 1990 had posed a technical problem for him to study for his thesis. It
> related to estimation theory.
>
> Kalata, who did not appear at the trial, said in a 1998 deposition that a
> Cherry Hill company for which he was a paid consultant, K-Tron
> International, had asked him to develop an alternate estimation method for
> it. The company manufactures bulk material feeders and conveyors used in
> industrial processes.
>
> Morein testified that, after much study, he experienced "a flash of
> inspiration" and came up with a novel mathematical concept to address the
> problem Kalata had presented.
>
> Without his knowledge, Morein said, Kalata shared the idea with K-Tron.
>
> K-Tron then applied for a patent, listing Kalata and Morein as co-inventors.
>
> Morein said he agreed "under duress" to the arrangement, but felt "locked
> into a highly disadvantageous situation." As a result, he testified, he
> became alienated from Kalata.
>
> As events unfolded, Kalata signed over his interest in the patent to K-Tron.
> The company never capitalized on the technology and eventually allowed the
> patent to lapse. No one made any money from it.

Because it was bogus. Even Kalata was mortified that he was a victim
of this SCAMSTER, Robert Morein.

> In 1991, Morein went to the head of Drexel's electrical engineering
> department, accused Kalata of appropriating his intellectual property, and
> asked for a new faculty adviser.

The staff at Drexel laughed wildly at the ignorance of Robert Morein.

> He didn't get one. Instead, a committee of four professors, including
> Kalata, was formed to oversee Morein's thesis work.
>
> Four years later, the committee dismissed him, saying he had failed to
> complete his thesis.

So Morein ****s up his first couple years, gets new faculty advisers
(a TEAM), and then ****s up again! Brilliant!

>
> Morein claimed that the committee intentionally had undermined him.

Morein makes LOTS of claims that are nonsense. One look thru the
usenet proves it.

>
> Judge Sylvester agreed. In her ruling, Sylvester wrote: "It is this court's
> opinion that the defendants were motivated by bad faith and ill will."

So much for political machine judges.
>
> The U.S. Supreme Court receives 7,000 appeals a year and agrees to hear only
> about 100 of them.
>
> Hamburg, Drexel's attorney, is betting the high court will reject Morein's
> appeal out of hand because its focal point - concerning a student's right to
> intellectual property - was not central to the litigation in the
> Pennsylvania courts.

> Morein said he understands it's a long shot, but he feels he must pursue it.

Just like all the failed "causes" Morein pursues. Heck, he's been
chasing another "Brian McCarty" for years and yet has ZERO impact on
anything.

Failure. Look it up in Websters. You'll see a picture of Robert
Morein. The poster boy for SCAMMING LOSERS.

>
> "I had to seek closure," he said.
>
> Without a doctorate, he said, he has been unable to pursue a career he had
> hoped would lead him into research on artificial intelligence.

Who better to tell us about "artificial intelligence".
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

>
> As it is, Morein lives at home with his father and makes a modest income
> from stock investments. He has written a film script that he is trying to
> make into a movie. And in the basement of his father's home he is working on
> an invention, an industrial pump so powerful it could cut steel with a
> bulletlike stream of water.


FAILED STUDENT
FAILED MOVIE MAKER
FAILED SCREENWRITER
FAILED INVESTOR
FAILED DRIVER
FAILED SON
FAILED PARENTS
FAILED INVENTOR
FAILED PLAINTIFF
FAILED HOMOSEXUAL
FAILED HUMAN
FAILED
FAILED

> But none of it is what he had imagined for himself.
>
> "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very
> gnawing thing."

Doomed to another miserable 10 years or so as a failed member of what
is mostly a productive human race. Most of us have successes and
failures, but the tough get up and succeed again. And again. And
again.

But a twisted few are forever failures.


Thanks for the kind summary of Robert Morein's failed existence from
the Philadelphia Inquirer.

A Real Brian McCarty
Successful

[Michael Mckelvy]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>
> >Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
> >
> >> > You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
> >
> >> That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
> >
> >Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack
of
> credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
> delusional thinking, and many more flaws.

Excellent self-portrait of yourself.

> Of course, they also both exhibit a lack of insight which has never been
> matched on RAO. Whether they share the same paranoid conspiracy theories
or
> listen to the same voices telling them how to act and think is harder to
tell.
>
>
>
What do YOUR voices tell you. Remove the beans from your ears first.
> Bruce J. Richman
>
>
>

[Lionel]

MiNE 109 wrote:

> In article >,
> Lionel > wrote:
>
>
>>MiNE 109 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article >,
>>> Lionel > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion
>>>
>>>
>>>Looks more like an adverb...
>>>
>>>Stephen
>>
>>You are right Sir.
>>
>>I wrote :
>>"This is just a way to barflying at low cost"
>>In this case this is an adverb
>>
>>And I guess that the correct sentence should be :
>>"This is just a way to barfly at low cost"
>>In this case this is a verb.
>>
>>You are the specialist I let you decide if one of the above is correct.
>
>
> I would prefer not to argue with a Frank Stallone fanatic.
>
> Stephen

Frank Stallone fanatic (lol) ?
First of all I think that "Barfly" is not a really good movie.
Sir, I don't care about Frank Stallone, Mickey Rourke...
I like Faye Dunaway since "Bonnie and Clyde".
No seriously, the only guy who is interesting in this story is Bukowski. ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ws.com
>>
>>> On 10/12/03 11:16 AM, in article ,
>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>> It's a forgery?
>>
>>>>> Please explain where the header differs from my other headers. As
>>>>> far as I can tell, McCarty is posting from sonicnews.net. When I
>>>>> post through comcast, the actual newsgroup provider is Giganews,
>>>>> who do it under contract to Comcast.

>>>> My error.

>>> Just the latest in a lifetime of errors.

>> So what? Show me someone who never made a mistake and I'll show you
someone
>> who had one heck of a boring, unproductive life. Even worse are the
>> people who only think they've made no mistakes...

>> "Nothing ventured, nothing gained."

> Now if you take a look at THAT header, you'll see it came from
> Sonicnews. McCarty is very active tonight.

I didn't look.

> I make no judgement as to what you've done with your lifetime.

You lie.

> As an aside, I was very impressed with your open-mindedness toward
> aetheism.

It's reality. Why would one deny reality?

> And I happen to agree with your reply.

Every once in a while, you rise above the morass of errors...

[MiNE 109]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> MiNE 109 wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > Lionel > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>MiNE 109 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article >,
> >>> Lionel > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>To barfly is a verb I have create for this special occasion
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Looks more like an adverb...
> >>>
> >>>Stephen
> >>
> >>You are right Sir.
> >>
> >>I wrote :
> >>"This is just a way to barflying at low cost"
> >>In this case this is an adverb
> >>
> >>And I guess that the correct sentence should be :
> >>"This is just a way to barfly at low cost"
> >>In this case this is a verb.
> >>
> >>You are the specialist I let you decide if one of the above is correct.
> >
> >
> > I would prefer not to argue with a Frank Stallone fanatic.
> >
> > Stephen
>
> Frank Stallone fanatic (lol) ?
> First of all I think that "Barfly" is not a really good movie.
> Sir, I don't care about Frank Stallone, Mickey Rourke...
> I like Faye Dunaway since "Bonnie and Clyde".
> No seriously, the only guy who is interesting in this story is Bukowski. ;-)
>

Yes, I agree. I've seen it.

Stephen

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:07:46 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>> Just like the mistake he made when he talked about "prepackaged sets"
>> of Silver Flute drivers. Note the notable silence on this issue, note.

>"Devil's", too.

I answered that.

--
td

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:16:27 -0400, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.83.128.158
>
>I believe it may be possible to configure some newsreaders to show a
>false domain in the message ID. However, to forge an NNTP host's IP
>address requires serious hacking skill.

Indeed.

--
td

P.S. This post did not originate from the IP address that's in the
header.

[George M. Middius]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

> P.S. This post did not originate from the IP address that's in the
> header.

"Never discuss evil with the devil." I should've known.

[dave weil]

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:16:22 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"Robert Morein" > wrote in message

>> It's a forgery?
>>
>> Please explain where the header differs from my other headers. As far
>> as I can tell, McCarty is posting from sonicnews.net. When I post
>> through comcast, the actual newsgroup provider is Giganews, who do it
>> under contract to Comcast.
>
>My error.

I congratulate you for this simple admission of error.

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said:

> >My error.
>
> I congratulate you for this simple admission of error.

Don't rush to judgment. Has anybody check Krooger's house for pods?

[trotsky]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:07:46 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>>Just like the mistake he made when he talked about "prepackaged sets"
>>>of Silver Flute drivers. Note the notable silence on this issue, note.
>>
>
>>"Devil's", too.
>
>
> I answered that.



Google reference, please.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:01:47 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>Google reference, please.

http://tinyurl.com/qnhp

--
td

[trotsky]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:01:47 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>Google reference, please.
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/qnhp


I'm sorry, did I misread your last post? I thought you said you
admitted to being in error by referring to my speakers as a "Madisound
kit". Now you're pointing me at I post that I wrote. Are you drunk
already?

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:35:29 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>I'm sorry, did I misread your last post? I thought you said you
>admitted to being in error by referring to my speakers as a "Madisound
>kit". Now you're pointing me at I post that I wrote. Are you drunk
>already?

Let's not get hung up on the word 'kit', hey? We know they're
Madisound-designed speakers. That's quite enough for me.

--
td

[trotsky]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:35:29 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>I'm sorry, did I misread your last post? I thought you said you
>>admitted to being in error by referring to my speakers as a "Madisound
>>kit". Now you're pointing me at I post that I wrote. Are you drunk
>>already?
>
>
> Let's not get hung up on the word 'kit', hey? We know they're
> Madisound-designed speakers. That's quite enough for me.


Too bad about that Trump Tower, too.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:31:16 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>> Let's not get hung up on the word 'kit', hey? We know they're
>> Madisound-designed speakers. That's quite enough for me.

>Too bad about that Trump Tower, too.

Too bad you can't serve fries.

--
td

[Bruce J. Richman]

Stainlress wrote:


>On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:31:16 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>>> Let's not get hung up on the word 'kit', hey? We know they're
>>> Madisound-designed speakers. That's quite enough for me.
>
>>Too bad about that Trump Tower, too.
>
>Too bad you can't serve fries.
>
>--
>td
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

He screwed up the job performance test at McDonald's when he said, "And would
you like some lies with that?"



Bruce J. Richman

[Joe Duffy]

In article >,
Bruce J. Richman > wrote:
>trotsky wrote:
>
>
>>ruce J. Richman wrote:
>>> George M. Middius wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>>>>
>>>>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack of
>>> credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
>>> delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
>>
>>
>>
>>That's cool, now do George. Or admit you're a fraud--your choice.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Lying through your teeth as usual. You are such a waste of subhuman matter.
>Idiots like you deserve to be pitied as much as blamed.
>
>

Is this your professional opinion?
Or is it just practice? LOL.


Joe

[Bruce J. Richman]

Joe Duffy wrote:


>In article >,
>Bruce J. Richman > wrote:
>>trotsky wrote:
>>
>>
>>>ruce J. Richman wrote:
>>>> George M. Middius wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>You share this personal characteristic with Singh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's a two point penalty for a low blow.
>>>>>
>>>>>Kroo**** is still more odious than Gregipus, don't you think?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but they have a tremendous number of similar personal traits. Lack
>of
>>>> credibility, arrogance, dishonesty, questionable contact with reality,
>>>> delusional thinking, and many more flaws.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>That's cool, now do George. Or admit you're a fraud--your choice.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Lying through your teeth as usual. You are such a waste of subhuman
>matter.
>>Idiots like you deserve to be pitied as much as blamed.
>>
>>
>
> Is this your professional opinion?
> Or is it just practice? LOL.
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Do you have anything useful to contribute, or are you just here to defend one
of RAO's most frequent flamers? It's quite predictable that you would identify
so closely with him.

LOL!



Bruce J. Richman