Correction for Ludovic

[[email protected]]

Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title, "A bit
form the BBC."

You can find the entire article here:

http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html

I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have misremember
that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title, "A
bit
> form the BBC."
>
> You can find the entire article here:
>
> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>
> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have misremember
> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>
You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.

[Sander deWaal]

" > said:

>Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title, "A bit
>form the BBC."

>You can find the entire article here:

>http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html

>I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have misremember
>that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.



Is that BBC report as reliable as their documentaries about Iraq? :-)

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title, "A
> bit
>> form the BBC."
>>
>> You can find the entire article here:
>>
>> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>>
>> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have misremember
>> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>>
> You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.
>
More irony.

[[email protected]]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> " > said:
>
>>Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>>I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title, "A
>>bit
>>form the BBC."
>
>>You can find the entire article here:
>
>>http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>
>>I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have misremember
>>that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>
>
>
> Is that BBC report as reliable as their documentaries about Iraq? :-)
>
>
They seem to do better with things that aren't political.
Smart ass. :-)

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title, "A
> bit
>> form the BBC."
>>
>> You can find the entire article here:
>>
>> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>>
>> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have misremember
>> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>>
> You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.
>
>
Inferior minds, are the ones that think they have to point out how much
smarter they think they are, when all the evidence points to them not only
being less smart than they think, but being in complete denial of reality.

Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol, shows you
are completely disconnected from reality.

You are dismissed.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
nk.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> >> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
> >> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title,
"A
> > bit
> >> form the BBC."
> >>
> >> You can find the entire article here:
> >>
> >> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
> >>
> >> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
misremember
> >> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
> >>
> > You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.
> >
> >
> Inferior minds, are the ones that think they have to point out how much
> smarter they think they are, when all the evidence points to them not only
> being less smart than they think, but being in complete denial of reality.
>
> Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol, shows you
> are completely disconnected from reality.
>
> You are dismissed.
>
Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
ABX has been proven worthless, by an argument I gave in another thread.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
> ...
> > " > said:
> >
> >>Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
> >>I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title, "A
> >>bit
> >>form the BBC."
> >
> >>You can find the entire article here:
> >
> >>http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
> >
> >>I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
misremember
> >>that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
> >
> >
> >
> > Is that BBC report as reliable as their documentaries about Iraq? :-)
> >
> >
> They seem to do better with things that aren't political.
> Smart ass. :-)
>
Dumb ass.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> nk.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>> >> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title,
> "A
>> > bit
>> >> form the BBC."
>> >>
>> >> You can find the entire article here:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>> >>
>> >> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
> misremember
>> >> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>> >>
>> > You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.
>> >
>> >
>> Inferior minds, are the ones that think they have to point out how much
>> smarter they think they are, when all the evidence points to them not
>> only
>> being less smart than they think, but being in complete denial of
>> reality.
>>
>> Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol, shows
>> you
>> are completely disconnected from reality.
>>
>> You are dismissed.
>>
> Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
> ABX has been proven worthless, by an argument I gave in another thread.
>
So the question remains, if ABX is worthless, why do so many people doing
audio research, rely on it?

Reason dictates that it is not worthless, but you are.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> hlink.net...
>>
>> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > " > said:
>> >
>> >>Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>> >>I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title,
>> >>"A
>> >>bit
>> >>form the BBC."
>> >
>> >>You can find the entire article here:
>> >
>> >>http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>> >
>> >>I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
> misremember
>> >>that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Is that BBC report as reliable as their documentaries about Iraq? :-)
>> >
>> >
>> They seem to do better with things that aren't political.
>> Smart ass. :-)
>>
> Dumb ass.
>
Shouldn't there be a message to go along with your sig.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > nk.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > link.net...
> >> >> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
> >> >> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread
title,
> > "A
> >> > bit
> >> >> form the BBC."
> >> >>
> >> >> You can find the entire article here:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
> >> >>
> >> >> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
> > misremember
> >> >> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
> >> >>
> >> > You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Inferior minds, are the ones that think they have to point out how much
> >> smarter they think they are, when all the evidence points to them not
> >> only
> >> being less smart than they think, but being in complete denial of
> >> reality.
> >>
> >> Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol, shows
> >> you
> >> are completely disconnected from reality.
> >>
> >> You are dismissed.
> >>
> > Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
> > ABX has been proven worthless, by an argument I gave in another thread.
> >
> So the question remains, if ABX is worthless, why do so many people doing
> audio research, rely on it?
>
> Reason dictates that it is not worthless, but you are.
>
ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > hlink.net...
> >>
> >> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > " > said:
> >> >
> >> >>Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
> >> >>I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title,
> >> >>"A
> >> >>bit
> >> >>form the BBC."
> >> >
> >> >>You can find the entire article here:
> >> >
> >> >>http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
> >> >
> >> >>I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
> > misremember
> >> >>that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Is that BBC report as reliable as their documentaries about Iraq? :-)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> They seem to do better with things that aren't political.
> >> Smart ass. :-)
> >>
> > Dumb ass.
> >
> Shouldn't there be a message to go along with your sig.
>
It is not a signature line, Mikey. It is a comment about you.

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
> For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.

Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on formal
dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.

Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles swoop down and carry
him off to their nest high above the Pacific ocean. From that vantage
point, he can dine sumptuously on worms and grubs, and never again worry
about the ineffable "differences" he's incapable of perceiving.

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
> > ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
> > For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
>
> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on formal
> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
>
At the very least, he could learn which end of a fork to climb on.

> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles swoop down and carry
> him off to their nest high above the Pacific ocean. From that vantage
> point, he can dine sumptuously on worms and grubs, and never again worry
> about the ineffable "differences" he's incapable of perceiving.
>
There are dumpsters with bug infestations. Dumpster-diving would be a more
attainable goal.

[paul packer]

On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 15:49:30 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>
" > wrote in message
nk.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>> >> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread title,
>"A
>> > bit
>> >> form the BBC."
>> >>
>> >> You can find the entire article here:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>> >>
>> >> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
>misremember
>> >> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>> >>
>> > You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.
>> >
>> >
>> Inferior minds, are the ones that think they have to point out how much
>> smarter they think they are, when all the evidence points to them not only
>> being less smart than they think, but being in complete denial of reality.
>>
>> Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol, shows you
>> are completely disconnected from reality.
>>
>> You are dismissed.
>>
>Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.

Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole demonstrates
a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and "protocol"
(both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along with
chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed a
rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > nk.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > link.net...
>> >> >> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>> >> >> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread
> title,
>> > "A
>> >> > bit
>> >> >> form the BBC."
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You can find the entire article here:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
>> > misremember
>> >> >> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>> >> >>
>> >> > You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Inferior minds, are the ones that think they have to point out how
>> >> much
>> >> smarter they think they are, when all the evidence points to them not
>> >> only
>> >> being less smart than they think, but being in complete denial of
>> >> reality.
>> >>
>> >> Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol, shows
>> >> you
>> >> are completely disconnected from reality.
>> >>
>> >> You are dismissed.
>> >>
>> > Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
>> > ABX has been proven worthless, by an argument I gave in another thread.
>> >
>> So the question remains, if ABX is worthless, why do so many people doing
>> audio research, rely on it?
>>
>> Reason dictates that it is not worthless, but you are.
>>
> ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
> For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
>
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[[email protected]]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
>> ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
>> For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
>
> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on formal
> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
>
Just because you come from a family of parasites......................

> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles ...................


I'm content now, George.


I have a great hi-fi, and I know the best ways to improve it whenever I
choose.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote
> in message ...
>>
>>
>> Robert Morein said:
>>
>> > ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
>> > For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
>>
>> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on formal
>> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
>>
> At the very least, he could learn which end of a fork to climb on.
>
>> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles swoop down and carry
>> him off to their nest high above the Pacific ocean. From that vantage
>> point, he can dine sumptuously on worms and grubs, and never again worry
>> about the ineffable "differences" he's incapable of perceiving.
>>
> There are dumpsters with bug infestations. Dumpster-diving would be a more
> attainable goal.
>
Wow, you are a great writer. No wonder you're a successful screen writer.
Oh wait, that's not you.
Never mind.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > hlink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> > " > said:
>> >> >
>> >> >>Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>> >> >>I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread
>> >> >>title,
>> >> >>"A
>> >> >>bit
>> >> >>form the BBC."
>> >> >
>> >> >>You can find the entire article here:
>> >> >
>> >> >>http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>> >> >
>> >> >>I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
>> > misremember
>> >> >>that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Is that BBC report as reliable as their documentaries about Iraq?
>> >> > :-)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> They seem to do better with things that aren't political.
>> >> Smart ass. :-)
>> >>
>> > Dumb ass.
>> >
>> Shouldn't there be a message to go along with your sig.
>>
> It is not a signature line, Mikey. It is a comment about you.
>
So you're back to being a liar as well as a fool.

Yawn.

[Robert Morein]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 15:49:30 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> " > wrote in message
> nk.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > link.net...
> >> >> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
> >> >> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread
title,
> >"A
> >> > bit
> >> >> form the BBC."
> >> >>
> >> >> You can find the entire article here:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
> >> >>
> >> >> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
> >misremember
> >> >> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
> >> >>
> >> > You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Inferior minds, are the ones that think they have to point out how much
> >> smarter they think they are, when all the evidence points to them not
only
> >> being less smart than they think, but being in complete denial of
reality.
> >>
> >> Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol, shows
you
> >> are completely disconnected from reality.
> >>
> >> You are dismissed.
> >>
> >Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
>
> Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole demonstrates
> a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and "protocol"
> (both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along with
> chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
> Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
> attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
> evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed a
> rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)

Paul, the talent of the mckelviphibian for mimicry has been noted by
amphibian biologists. While further research should be conducted, I am
inclined to think that the verbiage you have noted is part of the Arny
Krueger phrasebook. However, I support the desire of all of God's creatures
to better themselves, so here, rewritten, appears the sentence as it should
have in the first place:
"Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol is
indicative of your skeptical nature."
And (as Churchill would say) with that, I could not agree more.

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote in message ...
>>
>>
>> Robert Morein said:
>>
>>> ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
>>> For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
>>
>> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on formal
>> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
>>
> Just because you come from a family of parasites......................
>
>> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles ...................
>
>
> I'm content now, George.
>
>
> I have a great hi-fi, and I know the best ways to improve it whenever I
> choose.
>

Tell us all about your great hifi
What you got??

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 15:49:30 -0400, "Robert Morein"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> " > wrote in message
>> nk.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > link.net...
>> >> >> Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>> >> >> I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread
> title,
>> >"A
>> >> > bit
>> >> >> form the BBC."
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You can find the entire article here:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
>> >misremember
>> >> >> that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>> >> >>
>> >> > You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Inferior minds, are the ones that think they have to point out how
>> >> much
>> >> smarter they think they are, when all the evidence points to them not
> only
>> >> being less smart than they think, but being in complete denial of
> reality.
>> >>
>> >> Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol, shows
> you
>> >> are completely disconnected from reality.
>> >>
>> >> You are dismissed.
>> >>
>> >Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
>>
>> Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole demonstrates
>> a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and "protocol"
>> (both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along with
>> chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
>> Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
>> attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
>> evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed a
>> rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)
>
> Paul, the talent of the mckelviphibian for mimicry has been noted by
> amphibian biologists. While further research should be conducted, I am
> inclined to think that the verbiage you have noted is part of the Arny
> Krueger phrasebook. However, I support the desire of all of God's
> creatures
> to better themselves, so here, rewritten, appears the sentence as it
> should
> have in the first place:
> "Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol is
> indicative of your skeptical nature."
> And (as Churchill would say) with that, I could not agree more.
>
But that would changing the meaning.
Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the the ABX protocol is
indicative of the fact that you are not only unscientific, but in serious
denial.

[[email protected]]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>> wrote in message ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Robert Morein said:
>>>
>>>> ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
>>>> For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
>>>
>>> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on formal
>>> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
>>>
>> Just because you come from a family of parasites......................
>>
>>> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles ...................
>>
>>
>> I'm content now, George.
>>
>>
>> I have a great hi-fi, and I know the best ways to improve it whenever I
>> choose.
>>
>
> Tell us all about your great hifi
> What you got??
>
An amp, pream/tuner, CD player, cassette deck, DVD player, non-audiophile
approved turntable, electronic xover, 2 sattelite speakers and a subwoofer,
outboard Surround processor, and a comfy chair.

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> " > wrote in message
>> link.net...
>>>
>>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>>> wrote in message ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Robert Morein said:
>>>>
>>>>> ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
>>>>> For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
>>>>
>>>> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on
>>>> formal
>>>> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
>>>>
>>> Just because you come from a family of parasites......................
>>>
>>>> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles ...................
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm content now, George.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a great hi-fi, and I know the best ways to improve it whenever I
>>> choose.
>>>
>>
>> Tell us all about your great hifi
>> What you got??
>>
> An amp, pream/tuner, CD player, cassette deck, DVD player, non-audiophile
> approved turntable, electronic xover, 2 sattelite speakers and a
> subwoofer, outboard Surround processor, and a comfy chair.

Which particlar ones, dumbass.
You're the one telling us its 'great'

[[email protected]]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> " > wrote in message
>>> link.net...
>>>>
>>>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>>>> wrote in message ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert Morein said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
>>>>>> For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on
>>>>> formal
>>>>> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
>>>>>
>>>> Just because you come from a family of parasites......................
>>>>
>>>>> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles ...................
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm content now, George.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have a great hi-fi, and I know the best ways to improve it whenever I
>>>> choose.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Tell us all about your great hifi
>>> What you got??
>>>
>> An amp, pream/tuner, CD player, cassette deck, DVD player, non-audiophile
>> approved turntable, electronic xover, 2 sattelite speakers and a
>> subwoofer, outboard Surround processor, and a comfy chair.
>
> Which particlar ones, dumbass.

Why are you responding to Morein?

> You're the one telling us its 'great'

It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it would
open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in naming them.
Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp, (Acoustat) and the CD
player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they are both recognized
as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> " > wrote in message
>> link.net...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> " > wrote in message
>>>> link.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>>>>> wrote in message ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Robert Morein said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
>>>>>>> For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on
>>>>>> formal
>>>>>> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Just because you come from a family of parasites......................
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles
>>>>>> ...................
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm content now, George.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a great hi-fi, and I know the best ways to improve it whenever
>>>>> I choose.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tell us all about your great hifi
>>>> What you got??
>>>>
>>> An amp, pream/tuner, CD player, cassette deck, DVD player,
>>> non-audiophile approved turntable, electronic xover, 2 sattelite
>>> speakers and a subwoofer, outboard Surround processor, and a comfy
>>> chair.
>>
>> Which particlar ones, dumbass.
>
> Why are you responding to Morein?
>
>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>
> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it
> would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in naming
> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp, (Acoustat)
> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they are
> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.
>

I listened to a Rotel cd player a number of years back. Stereophile
reviewers loved it. I thought it was unlistenable.
I heard an Acoustat amp once, not under ideal conditions
in a store. It was ok, I have heard worse and I have heard better.

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
>
>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>
> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it
> would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in naming
> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp, (Acoustat)
> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they are
> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.
>

Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
you got hoodwinked, to me.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:54:16 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:


>> >Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
>>
>> Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole demonstrates
>> a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and "protocol"
>> (both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along with
>> chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
>> Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
>> attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
>> evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed a
>> rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)
>
>Paul, the talent of the mckelviphibian for mimicry has been noted by
>amphibian biologists. While further research should be conducted, I am
>inclined to think that the verbiage you have noted is part of the Arny
>Krueger phrasebook. However, I support the desire of all of God's creatures
>to better themselves, so here, rewritten, appears the sentence as it should
>have in the first place:
>"Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol is
>indicative of your skeptical nature."
>And (as Churchill would say) with that, I could not agree more.

I didn't mean that the sentence made sense or was well written, just
that Mike is trying to disprove your poor opinion of him, and is thus
interested in "self improvement", a sure spur to evolutionary
progress. I was just hoping you might acknowledge his efforts.

[Robert Morein]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:54:16 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>
> >> >Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
> >>
> >> Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole demonstrates
> >> a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and "protocol"
> >> (both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along with
> >> chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
> >> Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
> >> attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
> >> evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed a
> >> rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)
> >
> >Paul, the talent of the mckelviphibian for mimicry has been noted by
> >amphibian biologists. While further research should be conducted, I am
> >inclined to think that the verbiage you have noted is part of the Arny
> >Krueger phrasebook. However, I support the desire of all of God's
creatures
> >to better themselves, so here, rewritten, appears the sentence as it
should
> >have in the first place:
> >"Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol is
> >indicative of your skeptical nature."
> >And (as Churchill would say) with that, I could not agree more.
>
> I didn't mean that the sentence made sense or was well written, just
> that Mike is trying to disprove your poor opinion of him, and is thus
> interested in "self improvement", a sure spur to evolutionary
> progress. I was just hoping you might acknowledge his efforts.
>
Paul, r.a.o. is not a place that rewards generosity of spirit. If I throw
the cur a bone, it will bite me. However, out of respect for you,
Mikey, congratulations on the improvement in self expression. I commend to
you, for further improvement, the classic "Elements of Style", by William
Strunk.

[Robert Morein]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
> >
> >
> >> You're the one telling us its 'great'
> >
> > It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it
> > would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in naming
> > them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp, (Acoustat)
> > and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they are
> > both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.
> >
>
> Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
> amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
> you got hoodwinked, to me.
>
Mikey is a complete hypocrite. Not long ago, he stated that he was getting
rid of the Acoustat. Now he keeps it, while still in denial about the crappy
QSC amp he can't or won't ditch.

Isn't that something? Next we'll discover that Arny listens to a Krell,
while boosting QSC to other people.

[[email protected]]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> " > wrote in message
>>> link.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> " > wrote in message
>>>>> link.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot]
>>>>>> net> wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Robert Morein said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
>>>>>>>> For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our
>>>>>>>> hearts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on
>>>>>>> formal
>>>>>>> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just because you come from a family of
>>>>>> parasites......................
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles
>>>>>>> ...................
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm content now, George.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a great hi-fi, and I know the best ways to improve it whenever
>>>>>> I choose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell us all about your great hifi
>>>>> What you got??
>>>>>
>>>> An amp, pream/tuner, CD player, cassette deck, DVD player,
>>>> non-audiophile approved turntable, electronic xover, 2 sattelite
>>>> speakers and a subwoofer, outboard Surround processor, and a comfy
>>>> chair.
>>>
>>> Which particlar ones, dumbass.
>>
>> Why are you responding to Morein?
>>
>>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>>
>> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it
>> would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in naming
>> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp, (Acoustat)
>> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they are
>> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.
>>
>
> I listened to a Rotel cd player a number of years back. Stereophile
> reviewers loved it. I thought it was unlistenable.
And you are both wrong, it just sounds like any othe CD player.

> I heard an Acoustat amp once, not under ideal conditions
> in a store. It was ok, I have heard worse and I have heard better.
Yet in reality, it's just another amp that is well made and sounds like
every other well made amp.

[[email protected]]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>>
>>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>>
>> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it
>> would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in naming
>> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp, (Acoustat)
>> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they are
>> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.
>>
>
> Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
> amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
> you got hoodwinked, to me.
>
The amp was second hand and as affordable as any other amp with that much
power.
The CD player was becuase I knew of Rotel's build quality form prior
experience.

I now have 3 DVD players 2 of which were free and CD's sound exactly the
same on all 3.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> " > wrote in message
>> link.net...
>> >
>> >
>> >> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>> >
>> > It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it
>> > would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in naming
>> > them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp, (Acoustat)
>> > and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they are
>> > both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.
>> >
>>
>> Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
>> amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
>> you got hoodwinked, to me.
>>
> Mikey is a complete hypocrite. Not long ago, he stated that he was getting
> rid of the Acoustat. Now he keeps it, while still in denial about the
> crappy
> QSC amp he can't or won't ditch.
>
The QSC just needed a couple filter caps, so repair is a perfectly
reasonable option.
The only one in denail about the QSC amps is you, until you do a DBT to
prove it sounds different from another amp of your shoice, you can't
reasonably say it sounds bad. But then you have proven that you are not
reasonable.

> Isn't that something? Next we'll discover that Arny listens to a Krell,
> while boosting QSC to other people.
>
If you could get a Krell for the price of a Yamaha receiver, would you?
Would that make you a hypocrite, or just someone who took advantage of a
good price on a well made piece of gear?

[[email protected]]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:54:16 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>> >Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
>>>
>>> Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole demonstrates
>>> a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and "protocol"
>>> (both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along with
>>> chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
>>> Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
>>> attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
>>> evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed a
>>> rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)
>>
>>Paul, the talent of the mckelviphibian for mimicry has been noted by
>>amphibian biologists. While further research should be conducted, I am
>>inclined to think that the verbiage you have noted is part of the Arny
>>Krueger phrasebook. However, I support the desire of all of God's
>>creatures
>>to better themselves, so here, rewritten, appears the sentence as it
>>should
>>have in the first place:
>>"Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol is
>>indicative of your skeptical nature."
>>And (as Churchill would say) with that, I could not agree more.
>
> I didn't mean that the sentence made sense or was well written, just
> that Mike is trying to disprove your poor opinion of him, and is thus
> interested in "self improvement", a sure spur to evolutionary
> progress. I was just hoping you might acknowledge his efforts.
>
Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my typing
and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> >>
> >>
> >>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
> >>
> >> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it
> >> would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in naming
> >> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp, (Acoustat)
> >> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they are
> >> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.
> >>
> >
> > Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
> > amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
> > you got hoodwinked, to me.
> >
> The amp was second hand and as affordable as any other amp with that much
> power.
> The CD player was becuase I knew of Rotel's build quality form prior
> experience.
>
> I now have 3 DVD players 2 of which were free and CD's sound exactly the
> same on all 3.
>
If you can't tell the difference between an Acoustat and a QSC amp, you have
a very serious hearing problem.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:54:16 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> >Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole demonstrates
> >>> a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and "protocol"
> >>> (both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along with
> >>> chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
> >>> Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
> >>> attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
> >>> evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed a
> >>> rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)
> >>
> >>Paul, the talent of the mckelviphibian for mimicry has been noted by
> >>amphibian biologists. While further research should be conducted, I am
> >>inclined to think that the verbiage you have noted is part of the Arny
> >>Krueger phrasebook. However, I support the desire of all of God's
> >>creatures
> >>to better themselves, so here, rewritten, appears the sentence as it
> >>should
> >>have in the first place:
> >>"Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol is
> >>indicative of your skeptical nature."
> >>And (as Churchill would say) with that, I could not agree more.
> >
> > I didn't mean that the sentence made sense or was well written, just
> > that Mike is trying to disprove your poor opinion of him, and is thus
> > interested in "self improvement", a sure spur to evolutionary
> > progress. I was just hoping you might acknowledge his efforts.
> >
> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my typing
> and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>
Mikey, your vocabulary is small. Your grammar is poor. And yes, your
spelling is also poor, but it is the least of your problems. You cannot
blame your poor writing on forgetfulness. Writing exhibits the quality of
the mind. You have shown us nothing.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> > wrote
> > in message ...
> >>
> >>
> >> Robert Morein said:
> >>
> >> > ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
> >> > For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.
> >>
> >> Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on
formal
> >> dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.
> >>
> > At the very least, he could learn which end of a fork to climb on.
> >
> >> Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles swoop down and carry
> >> him off to their nest high above the Pacific ocean. From that vantage
> >> point, he can dine sumptuously on worms and grubs, and never again
worry
> >> about the ineffable "differences" he's incapable of perceiving.
> >>
> > There are dumpsters with bug infestations. Dumpster-diving would be a
more
> > attainable goal.
> >
> Wow, you are a great writer.
Mikey, George did most of the writing, and it's good.

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:54:16 -0400, "Robert Morein"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> >Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole demonstrates
>>>> a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and "protocol"
>>>> (both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along with
>>>> chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
>>>> Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
>>>> attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
>>>> evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed a
>>>> rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)
>>>
>>>Paul, the talent of the mckelviphibian for mimicry has been noted by
>>>amphibian biologists. While further research should be conducted, I am
>>>inclined to think that the verbiage you have noted is part of the Arny
>>>Krueger phrasebook. However, I support the desire of all of God's
>>>creatures
>>>to better themselves, so here, rewritten, appears the sentence as it
>>>should
>>>have in the first place:
>>>"Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol is
>>>indicative of your skeptical nature."
>>>And (as Churchill would say) with that, I could not agree more.
>>
>> I didn't mean that the sentence made sense or was well written, just
>> that Mike is trying to disprove your poor opinion of him, and is thus
>> interested in "self improvement", a sure spur to evolutionary
>> progress. I was just hoping you might acknowledge his efforts.
>>
> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my typing
> and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>

>>
> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my typing
> and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>

Wrong eye hem knot tying two prove anything, mien vocabulary is feign, my
tie ping and forgetfulness bout spill Czech king is another problem

[Sander deWaal]

" > said:

>The QSC just needed a couple filter caps, so repair is a perfectly
>reasonable option.


Huh? How old is that amp?
Providing proper ventilation and no voltage surges, 'lytics should
survive at least 10 years before problems may be expected.

If you can get them, try BHC components electros, they have a good rep
for longevity (both with me and some other amp builders).
While you're at it, select a value and voltage that's a tad higher
than specified.

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[[email protected]]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> " > said:
>
>>The QSC just needed a couple filter caps, so repair is a perfectly
>>reasonable option.
>
>
> Huh? How old is that amp?

I'm sorry, I don't own a QSC I meant the Acoustat.
I don't really know how old it is, as I said I bought it used.

> Providing proper ventilation and no voltage surges, 'lytics should
> survive at least 10 years before problems may be expected.
>
I have had over 10 years now.

> If you can get them, try BHC components electros, they have a good rep
> for longevity (both with me and some other amp builders).
> While you're at it, select a value and voltage that's a tad higher
> than specified.
>
>
>
A look inside this puppy will tell you that it is over built in the first
place, but I know bigger caps giveyou a bit more headroom.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> hlink.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>> >>
>> >> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it
>> >> would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in
>> >> naming
>> >> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp,
>> >> (Acoustat)
>> >> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they
>> >> are
>> >> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
>> > amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
>> > you got hoodwinked, to me.
>> >
>> The amp was second hand and as affordable as any other amp with that much
>> power.
>> The CD player was becuase I knew of Rotel's build quality form prior
>> experience.
>>
>> I now have 3 DVD players 2 of which were free and CD's sound exactly the
>> same on all 3.
>>
> If you can't tell the difference between an Acoustat and a QSC amp, you
> have
> a very serious hearing problem.
>
You'd like to believe that wouldn't you. The fact is in a blind comparison,
you couldn't do it either. Naturally being the coward you are, you would
never subject yourself to that kind of failure.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> hlink.net...
>>
>> "paul packer" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:54:16 -0400, "Robert Morein"
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>> >Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole demonstrates
>> >>> a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and "protocol"
>> >>> (both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along with
>> >>> chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
>> >>> Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
>> >>> attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
>> >>> evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed a
>> >>> rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)
>> >>
>> >>Paul, the talent of the mckelviphibian for mimicry has been noted by
>> >>amphibian biologists. While further research should be conducted, I am
>> >>inclined to think that the verbiage you have noted is part of the Arny
>> >>Krueger phrasebook. However, I support the desire of all of God's
>> >>creatures
>> >>to better themselves, so here, rewritten, appears the sentence as it
>> >>should
>> >>have in the first place:
>> >>"Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol is
>> >>indicative of your skeptical nature."
>> >>And (as Churchill would say) with that, I could not agree more.
>> >
>> > I didn't mean that the sentence made sense or was well written, just
>> > that Mike is trying to disprove your poor opinion of him, and is thus
>> > interested in "self improvement", a sure spur to evolutionary
>> > progress. I was just hoping you might acknowledge his efforts.
>> >
>> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
>> typing
>> and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>>
> Mikey, your vocabulary is small. Your grammar is poor. And yes, your
> spelling is also poor, but it is the least of your problems. You cannot
> blame your poor writing on forgetfulness. Writing exhibits the quality of
> the mind. You have shown us nothing.
>
>
Blah, blah, blah.

[[email protected]]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> hlink.net...
>>
>
>>>
>> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
>> typing and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>>
>
> Wrong eye hem knot tying two prove anything, mien vocabulary is feign, my
> tie ping and forgetfulness bout spill Czech king is another problem
>
Not all that different from the fact that it takes you 2 or 3 times before
you actually type a response before you hit send.

[Sander deWaal]

" > said:

<Acoustat>


>A look inside this puppy will tell you that it is over built in the first
>place, but I know bigger caps giveyou a bit more headroom.


I'm familiar with the TNT200, one of the best amps of the era if you
ask me. Good build quality as well, except for the internal wiring.

However, watch out for too many uFs after the rectifier, the charge
current needed may overload the rect. bridge and/or the transformer!

A higher specified voltage will in general lengthen the life of
electros by several years.

If you're not sure about your rectfier and tranny capable of handling
the higher cap values, put a 0.1 ohm/10 watt WW resistor in each
supply rail to the filter caps to avoid high current peaks during the
charge period (8.3 mS for your 60 Hz mains frequency).

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> " > wrote in message
>> hlink.net...
>>>
>>
>>>>
>>> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
>>> typing and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>>>
>>
>> Wrong eye hem knot tying two prove anything, mien vocabulary is feign, my
>> tie ping and forgetfulness bout spill Czech king is another problem
>>
> Not all that different from the fact that it takes you 2 or 3 times before
> you actually type a response before you hit send.
>

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> " > wrote in message
>> hlink.net...
>>>
>>
>>>>
>>> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
>>> typing and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>>>
>>
>> Wrong eye hem knot tying two prove anything, mien vocabulary is feign, my
>> tie ping and forgetfulness bout spill Czech king is another problem
>>
> Not all that different from the fact that it takes you 2 or 3 times before
> you actually type a response before you hit send.
>

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> " > wrote in message
>> hlink.net...
>>>
>>
>>>>
>>> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
>>> typing and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>>>
>>
>> Wrong eye hem knot tying two prove anything, mien vocabulary is feign, my
>> tie ping and forgetfulness bout spill Czech king is another problem
>>
> Not all that different from the fact that it takes you 2 or 3 times before
> you actually type a response before you hit send.

Really? Do I do that?
>
>

[[email protected]]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> " > said:
>
> <Acoustat>
>
>
>>A look inside this puppy will tell you that it is over built in the first
>>place, but I know bigger caps giveyou a bit more headroom.
>
>
> I'm familiar with the TNT200, one of the best amps of the era if you
> ask me. Good build quality as well, except for the internal wiring.
>
> However, watch out for too many uFs after the rectifier, the charge
> current needed may overload the rect. bridge and/or the transformer!
>
> A higher specified voltage will in general lengthen the life of
> electros by several years.
>
> If you're not sure about your rectfier and tranny capable of handling
> the higher cap values, put a 0.1 ohm/10 watt WW resistor in each
> supply rail to the filter caps to avoid high current peaks during the
> charge period (8.3 mS for your 60 Hz mains frequency).
>
> --
>
Thanks Sander, useful information as always, but the fact is the cap values
are already known and I never try to reverse engineer, especially something
that IIRC was designed by Nelson Pass.

[[email protected]]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> " > wrote in message
>>> hlink.net...
>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
>>>> typing and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong eye hem knot tying two prove anything, mien vocabulary is feign,
>>> my
>>> tie ping and forgetfulness bout spill Czech king is another problem
>>>
>> Not all that different from the fact that it takes you 2 or 3 times
>> before you actually type a response before you hit send.
>
> Really? Do I do that?
>>
>>
>
>

[[email protected]]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> " > wrote in message
>>> hlink.net...
>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
>>>> typing and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong eye hem knot tying two prove anything, mien vocabulary is feign,
>>> my
>>> tie ping and forgetfulness bout spill Czech king is another problem
>>>
>> Not all that different from the fact that it takes you 2 or 3 times
>> before you actually type a response before you hit send.
>
> Really? Do I do that?
>>
>>
>
>

[[email protected]]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> " > wrote in message
>>> hlink.net...
>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
>>>> typing and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong eye hem knot tying two prove anything, mien vocabulary is feign,
>>> my
>>> tie ping and forgetfulness bout spill Czech king is another problem
>>>
>> Not all that different from the fact that it takes you 2 or 3 times
>> before you actually type a response before you hit send.
>
> Really? Do I do that?
>>
>>
>
Sometimes.

[paul packer]

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:14:36 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:


>> I didn't mean that the sentence made sense or was well written, just
>> that Mike is trying to disprove your poor opinion of him, and is thus
>> interested in "self improvement", a sure spur to evolutionary
>> progress. I was just hoping you might acknowledge his efforts.
>>
>Paul, r.a.o. is not a place that rewards generosity of spirit.

Of course it is. Look what a generous spirit George is, and he gets
his reward every day just posting here. :-)

>If I throw
>the cur a bone, it will bite me.

You've proved this? It's not good science to make unproven statements.

>However, out of respect for you,
>Mikey, congratulations on the improvement in self expression. I commend to
>you, for further improvement, the classic "Elements of Style", by William
>Strunk.

Hmmm. No, please say it again, nicely, and look him in the eye this
time. :-)

[dizzy]

On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 15:49:30 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>ABX has been proven worthless,

Guffaw.

[Sander deWaal]

" > said:

>Thanks Sander, useful information as always, but the fact is the cap values
>are already known and I never try to reverse engineer, especially something
>that IIRC was designed by Nelson Pass.


If your type 120 is a light version of the TNT200, the design is most
likely from Jim Strickland, who did things a bit better than Pass
IMHO.

But remember, higher voltage ratings don't hurt.

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >>
> >> " > wrote in message
> >> link.net...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> You're the one telling us its 'great'
> >> >
> >> > It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are,
it
> >> > would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in
naming
> >> > them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp,
(Acoustat)
> >> > and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they
are
> >> > both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to
read.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
> >> amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
> >> you got hoodwinked, to me.
> >>
> > Mikey is a complete hypocrite. Not long ago, he stated that he was
getting
> > rid of the Acoustat. Now he keeps it, while still in denial about the
> > crappy
> > QSC amp he can't or won't ditch.
> >
> The QSC just needed a couple filter caps, so repair is a perfectly
> reasonable option.
> The only one in denail about the QSC amps is you, until you do a DBT to
> prove it sounds different from another amp of your shoice, you can't
> reasonably say it sounds bad. But then you have proven that you are not
> reasonable.
>
The QSC is trash. Heave it.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > hlink.net...
> >>
> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > link.net...
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
> >> >>
> >> >> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are,
it
> >> >> would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in
> >> >> naming
> >> >> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp,
> >> >> (Acoustat)
> >> >> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they
> >> >> are
> >> >> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to
read.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
> >> > amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
> >> > you got hoodwinked, to me.
> >> >
> >> The amp was second hand and as affordable as any other amp with that
much
> >> power.
> >> The CD player was becuase I knew of Rotel's build quality form prior
> >> experience.
> >>
> >> I now have 3 DVD players 2 of which were free and CD's sound exactly
the
> >> same on all 3.
> >>
> > If you can't tell the difference between an Acoustat and a QSC amp, you
> > have
> > a very serious hearing problem.
> >
> You'd like to believe that wouldn't you. The fact is in a blind
comparison,
> you couldn't do it either. Naturally being the coward you are, you would
> never subject yourself to that kind of failure.
>
QSC amps sound like pure crap. I can stand one for about 30 seconds, before
it drives me out of the room

[Robert Morein]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:14:36 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>
> >> I didn't mean that the sentence made sense or was well written, just
> >> that Mike is trying to disprove your poor opinion of him, and is thus
> >> interested in "self improvement", a sure spur to evolutionary
> >> progress. I was just hoping you might acknowledge his efforts.
> >>
> >Paul, r.a.o. is not a place that rewards generosity of spirit.
>
> Of course it is. Look what a generous spirit George is, and he gets
> his reward every day just posting here. :-)
>
> >If I throw
> >the cur a bone, it will bite me.
>
> You've proved this? It's not good science to make unproven statements.
>
> >However, out of respect for you,
> >Mikey, congratulations on the improvement in self expression. I commend
to
> >you, for further improvement, the classic "Elements of Style", by William
> >Strunk.
>
> Hmmm. No, please say it again, nicely, and look him in the eye this
> time. :-)
>
Paul, you can kiss my Pass amplifier ;)

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > hlink.net...
> >>
> >
> >>>
> >> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
> >> typing and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
> >>
> >
> > Wrong eye hem knot tying two prove anything, mien vocabulary is feign,
my
> > tie ping and forgetfulness bout spill Czech king is another problem
> >
> Not all that different from the fact that it takes you 2 or 3 times before
> you actually type a response before you hit send.
>
Just a reminder, Mikey: QSC amplifiers are terrible sounding equipment. Good
for garage bands, PA, but certainly not hifi.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > hlink.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> > " > said:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
> >> >> >>I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread
> >> >> >>title,
> >> >> >>"A
> >> >> >>bit
> >> >> >>form the BBC."
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>You can find the entire article here:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
> >> > misremember
> >> >> >>that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Is that BBC report as reliable as their documentaries about Iraq?
> >> >> > :-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> They seem to do better with things that aren't political.
> >> >> Smart ass. :-)
> >> >>
> >> > Dumb ass.
> >> >
> >> Shouldn't there be a message to go along with your sig.
> >>
> > It is not a signature line, Mikey. It is a comment about you.
> >
> So you're back to being a liar as well as a fool.
>
> Yawn.
>
And QSC amps are still bad sounding, and you are still "special".

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > hlink.net...
> >>
> >> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:54:16 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>> >Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Yes, but you have to admit that Mike's post on the whole
demonstrates
> >> >>> a modicum of intelligence. Use of the words "efficacy" and
"protocol"
> >> >>> (both correctly spelt) are definitely good signs. I think, along
with
> >> >>> chastisement for errors, praise for effort should be applied.
> >> >>> Otherwise other posters might get the idea you don't appreciate the
> >> >>> attempts of a creature like the Mckelphibian to raise itself on the
> >> >>> evolutionary ladder, which might indicate that you yourself missed
a
> >> >>> rung on the way up. Fair's fair, Robert. :-)
> >> >>
> >> >>Paul, the talent of the mckelviphibian for mimicry has been noted by
> >> >>amphibian biologists. While further research should be conducted, I
am
> >> >>inclined to think that the verbiage you have noted is part of the
Arny
> >> >>Krueger phrasebook. However, I support the desire of all of God's
> >> >>creatures
> >> >>to better themselves, so here, rewritten, appears the sentence as it
> >> >>should
> >> >>have in the first place:
> >> >>"Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol is
> >> >>indicative of your skeptical nature."
> >> >>And (as Churchill would say) with that, I could not agree more.
> >> >
> >> > I didn't mean that the sentence made sense or was well written, just
> >> > that Mike is trying to disprove your poor opinion of him, and is thus
> >> > interested in "self improvement", a sure spur to evolutionary
> >> > progress. I was just hoping you might acknowledge his efforts.
> >> >
> >> Wrong, I am not trying to prove anything, my vocabulary is fine, my
> >> typing
> >> and forgetfulness bout spell check is another problem entirely.
> >>
> > Mikey, your vocabulary is small. Your grammar is poor. And yes, your
> > spelling is also poor, but it is the least of your problems. You cannot
> > blame your poor writing on forgetfulness. Writing exhibits the quality
of
> > the mind. You have shown us nothing.
> >
> >
> Blah, blah, blah.
>
Mikey, you have a weak mind.

[paul packer]

On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 02:46:18 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:


>> Hmmm. No, please say it again, nicely, and look him in the eye this
>> time. :-)
>>
>Paul, you can kiss my Pass amplifier ;)

I'll Pass on that, thanks.

[Arny Krueger]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message

> " > wrote in
> message
> hlink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> " > wrote in
>>> message
>>> hlink.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> " > wrote
>>>>> in message
>>>>> link.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter
>>>>>> what they are, it would open up a whole new set of
>>>>>> attacks, so there's no point in naming
>>>>>> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely
>>>>>> the amp, (Acoustat)
>>>>>> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide
>>>>>> them, and they are
>>>>>> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag
>>>>>> you care to read.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
>>>>> amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
>>>>> you got hoodwinked, to me.
>>>>>
>>>> The amp was second hand and as affordable as any other
>>>> amp with that much power.
>>>> The CD player was becuase I knew of Rotel's build
>>>> quality form prior experience.
>>>>
>>>> I now have 3 DVD players 2 of which were free and CD's
>>>> sound exactly the same on all 3.
>>>>
>>> If you can't tell the difference between an Acoustat
>>> and a QSC amp, you have
>>> a very serious hearing problem.
>>>
>> You'd like to believe that wouldn't you. The fact is in
>> a blind comparison, you couldn't do it either.
>> Naturally being the coward you are, you would never
>> subject yourself to that kind of failure.
>>
> QSC amps sound like pure crap. I can stand one for about
> 30 seconds, before it drives me out of the room

They can't be all bad, then!

QSC amps = how to clear the room of idiots.

[dizzy]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

>"Robert Moron" > wrote:
>>
>> QSC amps sound like pure crap. I can stand one for about
>> 30 seconds, before it drives me out of the room
>
>They can't be all bad, then!

LOL

>QSC amps = how to clear the room of idiots.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> hlink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > hlink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > link.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are,
> it
>> >> >> would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in
>> >> >> naming
>> >> >> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp,
>> >> >> (Acoustat)
>> >> >> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they
>> >> >> are
>> >> >> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to
> read.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
>> >> > amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
>> >> > you got hoodwinked, to me.
>> >> >
>> >> The amp was second hand and as affordable as any other amp with that
> much
>> >> power.
>> >> The CD player was becuase I knew of Rotel's build quality form prior
>> >> experience.
>> >>
>> >> I now have 3 DVD players 2 of which were free and CD's sound exactly
> the
>> >> same on all 3.
>> >>
>> > If you can't tell the difference between an Acoustat and a QSC amp, you
>> > have
>> > a very serious hearing problem.
>> >
>> You'd like to believe that wouldn't you. The fact is in a blind
> comparison,
>> you couldn't do it either. Naturally being the coward you are, you would
>> never subject yourself to that kind of failure.
>>
> QSC amps sound like pure crap. I can stand one for about 30 seconds,
> before
> it drives me out of the room
>
I recommend everybody get themselves a Morein repellent.

[[email protected]]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>
>> " > wrote in
>> message
>> hlink.net...
>>>
>>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> " > wrote in
>>>> message
>>>> hlink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> " > wrote
>>>>>> in message
>>>>>> link.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter
>>>>>>> what they are, it would open up a whole new set of
>>>>>>> attacks, so there's no point in naming
>>>>>>> them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely
>>>>>>> the amp, (Acoustat)
>>>>>>> and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide
>>>>>>> them, and they are
>>>>>>> both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag
>>>>>>> you care to read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
>>>>>> amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
>>>>>> you got hoodwinked, to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The amp was second hand and as affordable as any other
>>>>> amp with that much power.
>>>>> The CD player was becuase I knew of Rotel's build
>>>>> quality form prior experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> I now have 3 DVD players 2 of which were free and CD's
>>>>> sound exactly the same on all 3.
>>>>>
>>>> If you can't tell the difference between an Acoustat
>>>> and a QSC amp, you have
>>>> a very serious hearing problem.
>>>>
>>> You'd like to believe that wouldn't you. The fact is in
>>> a blind comparison, you couldn't do it either.
>>> Naturally being the coward you are, you would never
>>> subject yourself to that kind of failure.
>>>
>> QSC amps sound like pure crap. I can stand one for about
>> 30 seconds, before it drives me out of the room
>
> They can't be all bad, then!
>
> QSC amps = how to clear the room of idiots.
Bingo.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > ink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > hlink.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> > " > said:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
>> >> >> >>I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread
>> >> >> >>title,
>> >> >> >>"A
>> >> >> >>bit
>> >> >> >>form the BBC."
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>You can find the entire article here:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
>> >> > misremember
>> >> >> >>that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Is that BBC report as reliable as their documentaries about Iraq?
>> >> >> > :-)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> They seem to do better with things that aren't political.
>> >> >> Smart ass. :-)
>> >> >>
>> >> > Dumb ass.
>> >> >
>> >> Shouldn't there be a message to go along with your sig.
>> >>
>> > It is not a signature line, Mikey. It is a comment about you.
>> >
>> So you're back to being a liar as well as a fool.
>>
>> Yawn.
>>
> And QSC amps are still bad sounding, and you are still "special".
>
Assuming you are using the common vernacular, where "bad" means "good" then
for once you are correct.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >>
>> >> " > wrote in message
>> >> link.net...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> You're the one telling us its 'great'
>> >> >
>> >> > It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are,
> it
>> >> > would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in
> naming
>> >> > them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp,
> (Acoustat)
>> >> > and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they
> are
>> >> > both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to
> read.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Why did you spend so much, mass market cd players and
>> >> amps are just as good, you know. Looks like
>> >> you got hoodwinked, to me.
>> >>
>> > Mikey is a complete hypocrite. Not long ago, he stated that he was
> getting
>> > rid of the Acoustat. Now he keeps it, while still in denial about the
>> > crappy
>> > QSC amp he can't or won't ditch.
>> >
>> The QSC just needed a couple filter caps, so repair is a perfectly
>> reasonable option.
>> The only one in denail about the QSC amps is you, until you do a DBT to
>> prove it sounds different from another amp of your shoice, you can't
>> reasonably say it sounds bad. But then you have proven that you are not
>> reasonable.
>>
> The QSC is trash. Heave it.
>
I don't own a QSC amp.

If I were to purchase one I'd have to replace the fan in it, since it has a
noisy fan.

There are other pro audio amps with quieter fans that i might consider for
driving my subwoofer, in bridged mono opreation. Nothing like 600 plus
watts for bass impact, IMO.

Until you have done a blind bias controlled comparison of any QSC amp
against any other amp of your choice, your comments on the sound qualitiy of
QSC amps are like you, meaningless.

[Arny Krueger]

" > wrote in
message
ink.net

> Until you have done a blind bias controlled comparison of
> any QSC amp against any other amp of your choice, your
> comments on the sound qualitiy of QSC amps are like you,
> meaningless.

Morein just rags on QSC amps to try to troll me.

[Sylvan Morein, DDS]

In article , "Arny Krueger"
> wrote:

> Morein just rags on QSC amps to try to troll me.

Very true, Mr. Krueger. He can't stop masquerading as a "scientist". He
has nothing else to do.

As he told the newspaper when they interviewed him, ""I don't really have a
replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing." Now he's
gnawing on you and your group.

Think about it. . . My one and only son has lived in the same room, in the
same house, in MY house, since the early 1950's. He's never had a job.
NEVER. He always impressed everyone as a "smart guy", although I know now
he's just a bull**** artist. SURE he's "smart" - he went to college for
almost 20 years on my dime!

His room is filled with electronics, computers, wires, empty beer cans, and
all nature of trash. He rarely leaves the house, but spends hours in the
basement "inventing". Do you know how many times we've had police, FBI,
Secret Service, and other investigators here? They won't charge him because
he's mentally ill.

$100,000 to the first person that can get this 53 year old into a job, any
job, and out of my house.

Sylvan Morein, DDS

PROVEN PUBLISHED FACTS about my Son, Robert Morein
--

Robert Morein History
--
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/ledgerenquirer/news/4853918.htm

> Doctoral student takes intellectual property case to Supreme Court
> By L. STUART DITZEN
> Philadelphia Inquirer
>
> PHILADELPHIA -Even the professors who dismissed him from a doctoral program
> at Drexel University agreed that Robert Morein was uncommonly smart.
>
> They apparently didn't realize that he was uncommonly stubborn too - so much
> so that he would mount a court fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court
> to challenge his dismissal.

The Supremes have already rejected this appeal, btw.
>
> "It's a personality trait I have - I'm a tenacious guy," said Morein, a
> pleasantly eccentric man regarded by friends as an inventive genius. "And we
> do come to a larger issue here."

An "inventive genius" that has never invented anything. And hardly
"pleasantly" eccentric.

> A five-year legal battle between this unusual ex-student and one of
> Philadelphia's premier educational institutions has gone largely unnoticed
> by the media and the public.

Because no one gives a **** about a 50 year old loser.
>
> But it has been the subject of much attention in academia.
>
> Drexel says it dismissed Morein in 1995 because he failed, after eight
> years, to complete a thesis required for a doctorate in electrical and
> computer engineering.

Not to mention the 12 years it took him to get thru high school!
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

>
> Morein, 50, of Dresher, Pa., contends that he was dismissed only after his
> thesis adviser "appropriated" an innovative idea Morein had developed in a
> rarefied area of thought called "estimation theory" and arranged to have it
> patented.

A contention rejected by three courts. From a 50 YEAR OLD that has
done NOTHING PRODUCTIVE with his life.

>
> In February 2000, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Esther R. Sylvester
> ruled that Morein's adviser indeed had taken his idea.

An idea that was worth nothing, because it didn't work. Just like
Robert Morein, who has never worked a day in his life.

>
> Sylvester held that Morein had been unjustly dismissed and she ordered
> Drexel to reinstate him or refund his tuition.

Funnily enough, Drexel AGREED to reinstate Morein, who rejected the
offer because he knew he was and IS a failed loser. Spending daddy's
money to cover up his lack of productivity.
>
> That brought roars of protest from the lions of academia. There is a long
> tradition in America of noninterference by the courts in academic decisions.
>
> Backed by every major university in Pennsylvania and organizations
> representing thousands of others around the country, Drexel appealed to the
> state Superior Court.
>
> The appellate court, by a 2-1 vote, reversed Sylvester in June 2001 and
> restored the status quo. Morein was, once again, out at Drexel. And the
> time-honored axiom that courts ought to keep their noses out of academic
> affairs was reasserted.
>
> The state Supreme Court declined to review the case and, in an ordinary
> litigation, that would have been the end of it.
>
> But Morein, in a quixotic gesture that goes steeply against the odds, has
> asked the highest court in the land to give him a hearing.

Daddy throws more money down the crapper.

> His attorney, Faye Riva Cohen, said the Supreme Court appeal is important
> even if it fails because it raises the issue of whether a university has a
> right to lay claim to a student's ideas - or intellectual property - without
> compensation.
>
> "Any time you are in a Ph.D. program, you are a serf, you are a slave," said
> Cohen. Morein "is concerned not only for himself. He feels that what
> happened to him is pretty common."

It's called HIGHER EDUCATION, honey. The students aren't in charge,
the UNIVERSITY and PROFESSORS are.


> Drexel's attorney, Neil J. Hamburg, called Morein's appeal - and his claim
> that his idea was stolen - "preposterous."
>
> "I will eat my shoe if the Supreme Court hears this case," declared Hamburg.
> "We're not even going to file a response. He is a brilliant guy, but his
> intelligence should be used for the advancement of society rather than
> pursuing self-destructive litigation."

No **** sherlock.

> The litigation began in 1997, when Morein sued Drexel claiming that a
> committee of professors had dumped him after he accused his faculty adviser,
> Paul Kalata, of appropriating his idea.
>
> His concept was considered to have potential value for businesses in
> minutely measuring the internal functions of machines, industrial processes
> and electronic systems.
>
> The field of "estimation theory" is one in which scientists attempt to
> calculate what they cannot plainly observe, such as the inside workings of a
> nuclear plant or a computer.

My estimation theory? There is NO brain at work inside the head of
Robert Morein, only sawdust.

>
> Prior to Morein's dismissal, Drexel looked into his complaint against Kalata
> and concluded that the associate professor had done nothing wrong. Kalata,
> through a university lawyer, declined to comment.
>
> At a nonjury trial before Sylvester in 1999, Morein testified that Kalata in
> 1990 had posed a technical problem for him to study for his thesis. It
> related to estimation theory.
>
> Kalata, who did not appear at the trial, said in a 1998 deposition that a
> Cherry Hill company for which he was a paid consultant, K-Tron
> International, had asked him to develop an alternate estimation method for
> it. The company manufactures bulk material feeders and conveyors used in
> industrial processes.
>
> Morein testified that, after much study, he experienced "a flash of
> inspiration" and came up with a novel mathematical concept to address the
> problem Kalata had presented.
>
> Without his knowledge, Morein said, Kalata shared the idea with K-Tron.
>
> K-Tron then applied for a patent, listing Kalata and Morein as co-inventors.
>
> Morein said he agreed "under duress" to the arrangement, but felt "locked
> into a highly disadvantageous situation." As a result, he testified, he
> became alienated from Kalata.
>
> As events unfolded, Kalata signed over his interest in the patent to K-Tron.
> The company never capitalized on the technology and eventually allowed the
> patent to lapse. No one made any money from it.

Because it was bogus. Even Kalata was mortified that he was a victim
of this SCAMSTER, Robert Morein.

> In 1991, Morein went to the head of Drexel's electrical engineering
> department, accused Kalata of appropriating his intellectual property, and
> asked for a new faculty adviser.

The staff at Drexel laughed wildly at the ignorance of Robert Morein.

> He didn't get one. Instead, a committee of four professors, including
> Kalata, was formed to oversee Morein's thesis work.
>
> Four years later, the committee dismissed him, saying he had failed to
> complete his thesis.

So Morein ****s up his first couple years, gets new faculty advisers
(a TEAM), and then ****s up again! Brilliant!

>
> Morein claimed that the committee intentionally had undermined him.

Morein makes LOTS of claims that are nonsense. One look thru the
usenet proves it.

>
> Judge Sylvester agreed. In her ruling, Sylvester wrote: "It is this court's
> opinion that the defendants were motivated by bad faith and ill will."

So much for political machine judges.
>
> The U.S. Supreme Court receives 7,000 appeals a year and agrees to hear only
> about 100 of them.
>
> Hamburg, Drexel's attorney, is betting the high court will reject Morein's
> appeal out of hand because its focal point - concerning a student's right to
> intellectual property - was not central to the litigation in the
> Pennsylvania courts.

> Morein said he understands it's a long shot, but he feels he must pursue it.

Failure. Look it up in Websters. You'll see a picture of Robert
Morein. The poster boy for SCAMMING LOSERS.

> "I had to seek closure," he said.
>
> Without a doctorate, he said, he has been unable to pursue a career he had
> hoped would lead him into research on artificial intelligence.

Who better to tell us about "artificial intelligence".
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

>
> As it is, Morein lives at home with his father and makes a modest income
> from stock investments. He has written a film script that he is trying to
> make into a movie. And in the basement of his father's home he is working on
> an invention, an industrial pump so powerful it could cut steel with a
> bulletlike stream of water.


FAILED STUDENT
FAILED MOVIE MAKER
FAILED SCREENWRITER
FAILED INVESTOR
FAILED DRIVER
FAILED SON
FAILED PARENTS
FAILED INVENTOR
FAILED PLAINTIFF
FAILED HOMOSEXUAL
FAILED HUMAN
FAILED
FAILED

> But none of it is what he had imagined for himself.
>
> "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very
> gnawing thing."

[Ayn Marx]

Sylvan Morein, DDS wrote:
> In article , "Arny Krueger"
> > wrote:
>
> > Morein just rags on QSC amps to try to troll me.
>
> Very true, Mr. Krueger. Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah. Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah. Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah. Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah. Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah. Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah. Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.Blah.etc Please stop posting this inane crap.

[GeoSynch]

Ayn Marx beseeched:

> McLardo wrote:

>> Arny Krueger wrote:

>> > Morein just rags on QSC amps to try to troll me.

>> Very true, Mr. Krueger. Blah.Blah..Please stop posting this inane crap.

You do realize your admonishments will only have the exact opposite effect.
BTW, what are you, a commie capitalist or something?


GeoSynch

[Ayn Marx]

GeoSynch wrote:
> Ayn Marx beseeched:
>
> > McLardo wrote:
>
> >> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> >> > Morein just rags on QSC amps to try to troll me.
>
> >> Very true, Mr. Krueger. Blah.Blah..Please stop posting this inane crap.
>
> You do realize your admonishments will only have the exact opposite effect.
> BTW, what are you, a commie capitalist or something?
>
>
No, a lesbian poofta who finds Rands epistemology worthy of
consideration but the mistaken extension of her ethic to justify
economic 'rationalism' obscene.

[Lionel]

Yusuf Jesus' Gospels interpretation :


>>> Very true, Mr. Krueger. Blah.Blah..Please stop posting this inane crap.
>
> You do realize your admonishments will only have the exact opposite
> effect.

The lesson also apply to you Geogag.

> BTW, what are you, a commie capitalist or something?

BTW Geogag, you are the only IS engineer who doesn't know how to trace an IP
address. :-)

[GeoSynch]

Ayn Marx declared:

>> BTW, what are you, a commie capitalist or something?

> No, a lesbian poofta who finds Rands epistemology worthy of
> consideration but the mistaken extension of her ethic to justify
> economic 'rationalism' obscene.

Uhm, like thanks for sharing ... far more than I wanted to know.


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Froggy leapt:

>> You do realize your admonishments will only have the exact opposite
>> effect.

> The lesson also apply to you Geogag.

You're quite the little irritant, responding to everything I post, whether it
concerns you or not. But what's usenet without a ****ant or two.

>> BTW, what are you, a commie capitalist or something?

> BTW Geogag, you are the only IS engineer who doesn't know how to trace an IP
> address. :-)

You might as well milk it for all it's worth, seeing how it provides a little
sparkle of
light in your otherwise dreary life.


GeoSynch

[Ayn Marx]

GeoSynch wrote:
> Ayn Marx declared:
>
> >> BTW, what are you, a commie capitalist or something?
>
> > No, a lesbian poofta who finds Rands epistemology worthy of
> > consideration but the mistaken extension of her ethic to justify
> > economic 'rationalism' obscene.
>
.... far more than I wanted to know.
>
But you don't.

[George Middius]

Stynchblob is quivering at the thought of Judgment Day arriving before he's
massacred his quota of sinners.

>Uhm, like thanks for sharing ... far more than I wanted to know.

Female muff-divers on motorcycles! Drag queens marching down the boulevards and
avenues! Homos teaching school, leading churches, and joining the Boy Scouts!
God's wrath is churning, and the Apocalypse is nigh!

[Lionel]

Yusuf Jesus wrote :

> You're quite the little irritant

Yes, but OTOH Jesus is with you.

[Lionel]

GeoStink a écrit :

> Ayn Marx declared:
>
>
>>>BTW, what are you, a commie capitalist or something?
>
>
>>No, a lesbian poofta who finds Rands epistemology worthy of
>>consideration but the mistaken extension of her ethic to justify
>>economic 'rationalism' obscene.
>
>
> Uhm, like thanks for sharing ... far more than I wanted to know.

Too bad, now you will need to wash your brain with blessed water.

[GeoSynch]

Ayn Marx wrote:

>> >> BTW, what are you, a commie capitalist or something?

>> > No, a lesbian poofta who finds Rands epistemology worthy of
>> > consideration but the mistaken extension of her ethic to justify
>> > economic 'rationalism' obscene.

>> ... far more than I wanted to know.

> But you don't.

What drove you to it (assuming Trevor and Packer aren't representative
of the typical Australian man)?
It's never too late to reconsider.
Just look at Anne Heche.


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Pudge the Gimp is on a roll:

>>Uhm, like thanks for sharing ... far more than I wanted to know.

> Female muff-divers on motorcycles!

Those pics of EveAnna Manley in Stereophile get you all hot and
bothered, Boy George?

> Drag queens marching down the boulevards and
> avenues! Homos teaching school, leading churches, and joining the Boy Scouts!
> God's wrath is churning, and the Apocalypse is nigh!

With all the calamities in place like Thailand and New Orleans, this may
be a swell time for you to visit San Francisco, 'lil Georgie, as the next big
earthquake there is probably just around the corner.


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Froggy chirped:

> Too bad, now you will need to wash your brain with blessed water.

"At least" I have one...


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Froggy wrote :

>> You're quite the little irritant

> Yes, but OTOH Jesus is with you.

Amen.


GeoSynch

[paul packer]

On 20 Oct 2005 08:03:27 -0700, George Middius
> wrote:

>Female muff-divers on motorcycles! Drag queens marching down the boulevards and
>avenues! Homos teaching school, leading churches, and joining the Boy Scouts!
>God's wrath is churning, and the Apocalypse is nigh!

Oh George...you do ramble on sometimes. Your fingernail marks are all
over the edges of reality.

[Lionel]

GeoStink wrote :

> Froggy wrote :
>
>>> You're quite the little irritant
>
>> Yes, but OTOH Jesus is with you.
>
> Amen.

Pavlov have written interesting things about such "reflex". ;-)

[Lionel]

In .net>, GeoSynch
wrote :

> Froggy chirped:
>
>> Too bad, now you will need to wash your brain with blessed water.
>
> "At least" I have one...

Sorry I prefer to be deprived than to suffer brainwashing. :-)

[paul packer]

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:04:52 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:

>Ayn Marx wrote:
>
>>> >> BTW, what are you, a commie capitalist or something?
>
>>> > No, a lesbian poofta who finds Rands epistemology worthy of
>>> > consideration but the mistaken extension of her ethic to justify
>>> > economic 'rationalism' obscene.
>
>>> ... far more than I wanted to know.
>
>> But you don't.
>
>What drove you to it (assuming Trevor and Packer aren't representative
>of the typical Australian man)?
>It's never too late to reconsider.
>Just look at Anne Heche.

And what does all this mean in English?

[George Middius]

paul packer said:

>>Female muff-divers on motorcycles! Drag queens marching down the boulevards
>>and avenues! Homos teaching school, leading churches, and joining the Boy
>>Scouts! God's wrath is churning, and the Apocalypse is nigh!

>Oh George...you do ramble on sometimes. Your fingernail marks are all
>over the edges of reality.

Quite a mild response from RAO's #3 Bible-thumper. I wasn't even trolling you,
paulie. You've been behaving much better lately and I, for one, appreciate it.

You may have noticed that Stynchblob is on the verge of another intense episode
of purple passion. I advise you to keep your distance, religious sympathies
notwithstanding, because when he starts spraying his righteous spittle, it
spatters everybody indiscriminately.



..
..
..
..
..
..

[George Middius]

paul packer said to Stynchblob:

>>What drove you to it (assuming Trevor and Packer aren't representative
>>of the typical Australian man)?
>>It's never too late to reconsider.
>>Just look at Anne Heche.

>And what does all this mean in English?

Stynchie believes gays and lesbians have an "illness".


..
..
..
..
..

[Arny Krueger]

"George Middius" > wrote in
message
> paul packer said to Stynchblob:
>
>>> What drove you to it (assuming Trevor and Packer aren't
>>> representative of the typical Australian man)?
>>> It's never too late to reconsider.
>>> Just look at Anne Heche.
>
>> And what does all this mean in English?
>
> Stynchie believes gays and lesbians have an "illness".

How are you a counter-example for that theory, Ge0rge?

[George Middius]

Homoborg dreams of firehoses.

>> Stynchie believes gays and lesbians have an "illness".

>How are you a counter-example for that theory, Ge0rge[sic]?

Thanks Mr. Krooborg for admitting that you bend over for every man and boy who
asks you to.

[Arny Krueger]

"George Middius" > wrote in
message


>>> Stynchie believes gays and lesbians have an "illness".

>> How are you a counter-example for that theory,
>> Ge0rge[sic]?
>
> Thanks Mr. Krooborg for admitting that you bend over for
> every man and boy who asks you to.

You got a problem with that Ge0rge - what kind of homophobe
are you? ;-)

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "George Middius" > wrote in
> message
> > paul packer said to Stynchblob:
> >
> >>> What drove you to it (assuming Trevor and Packer aren't
> >>> representative of the typical Australian man)?
> >>> It's never too late to reconsider.
> >>> Just look at Anne Heche.
> >
> >> And what does all this mean in English?
> >
> > Stynchie believes gays and lesbians have an "illness".
>
> How are you a counter-example for that theory, Ge0rge?

I believe that people who believe that gays and lesbians have an illness
are ill.

[[email protected]]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> " > wrote in
> message
> ink.net
>
>> Until you have done a blind bias controlled comparison of
>> any QSC amp against any other amp of your choice, your
>> comments on the sound qualitiy of QSC amps are like you,
>> meaningless.
>
> Morein just rags on QSC amps to try to troll me.
>
Hmmmmmmmmm, I thought it was just because he's an asshole.

[Lionel]

In >, Jenn
wrote :

> I believe that people who believe that gays and lesbians have an illness
> are ill.

We are all ill.
The problem is that some of us are thinking that their illness is smarter.
Geostink and Middius are aspiring to be the champions of their own clinical
speciality.

[GeoSynch]

Boy George poufed:

> Stynchie believes gays and lesbians have an "illness".

.... to engage in abominative practices.


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Jenn sniffed:

> I believe that people who believe that gays and lesbians have an illness
> are ill.

That's about as vapid as "Mean people suck." Another fine example of
our indoctrination-laden public education system.


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Froggy airs the vast expanse between his ears:

>>> Too bad, now you will need to wash your brain with blessed water.

>> "At least" I have one...

> Sorry I prefer to be deprived than to suffer brainwashing. :-)

Thanks for admitting you're brainless, something we've suspected all along.


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Froggy licks his chops:

>>>> You're quite the little irritant

>>> Yes, but OTOH Jesus is with you.

>> Amen.

> Pavlov have written interesting things about such "reflex". ;-)

You probably drool at the thought of snails.


GeoSynch

[Lionel]

GeoSynch a écrit :
> Froggy licks his chops:
>
>
>>>>>You're quite the little irritant
>
>
>>>>Yes, but OTOH Jesus is with you.
>
>
>>>Amen.
>
>
>>Pavlov have written interesting things about such "reflex". ;-)
>
>
> You probably drool at the thought of snails.

It's not my fault if you cannot dominate yourself.
Is there a Mrs Geostink ? ;-)

[Lionel]

GeoSynch a écrit :
> Froggy airs the vast expanse between his ears:
>
>
>>>>Too bad, now you will need to wash your brain with blessed water.
>
>
>>>"At least" I have one...
>
>
>>Sorry I prefer to be deprived than to suffer brainwashing. :-)
>
>
> Thanks for admitting you're brainless, something we've suspected all along.


Why do you say "we" ? How many are you in your schizophrenia ?
Anyway the clown is as mediocre as the I.S engineer. ;-)

[Lionel]

GeoStink a écrit :

> Boy George poufed:
>
>
>>Stynchie believes gays and lesbians have an "illness".
>
>
> ... to engage in abominative practices.

Are you experienced ?
Let us know... ;-)

[Jenn]

In article >,
"GeoSynch" > wrote:

> Jenn sniffed:
>
> > I believe that people who believe that gays and lesbians have an illness
> > are ill.
>
> That's about as vapid as "Mean people suck." Another fine example of
> our indoctrination-laden public education system.
>
>
> GeoSynch

Mean people do suck, and I had completed public education way before gay
issues were ever mentioned. I simply have good enough critical thinking
skills to understand that people who call people sick who aren't sick
have issues of their own. Anyway, have a nice day and don't worry be
happy.

[paul packer]

On 21 Oct 2005 07:15:43 -0700, George Middius
> wrote:

>
>
>paul packer said:
>
>>>Female muff-divers on motorcycles! Drag queens marching down the boulevards
>>>and avenues! Homos teaching school, leading churches, and joining the Boy
>>>Scouts! God's wrath is churning, and the Apocalypse is nigh!
>
>>Oh George...you do ramble on sometimes. Your fingernail marks are all
>>over the edges of reality.
>
>Quite a mild response from RAO's #3 Bible-thumper. I wasn't even trolling you,
>paulie.

No, but then I never wait to be asked, George.

>You've been behaving much better lately and I, for one, appreciate it.

But when was I ever misbehaving?

>You may have noticed that Stynchblob is on the verge of another intense episode
>of purple passion. I advise you to keep your distance, religious sympathies
>notwithstanding, because when he starts spraying his righteous spittle, it
>spatters everybody indiscriminately.

Personally I've never noticed an excess of religious zeal on RAO. It
just isn't one of the things the NG is noted for.

As for suggesting that your grip on reality might be less than secure,
my humblest apologies--I was out of line. Your grip is of course as
secure as ever. :-)

[GeoSynch]

Jenn jabbered:

>> > I believe that people who believe that gays and lesbians have an illness
>> > are ill.

>> That's about as vapid as "Mean people suck." Another fine example of
>> our indoctrination-laden public education system.

> Mean people do suck, and I had completed public education way before gay
> issues were ever mentioned.

Don't tell me ... let me guess: you're a tree-hugging, MoveOn.org-supporting,
Kerry-voting, America-hating, dyed-in-the-wool bleeding heart liberal, no?

> I simply have good enough critical thinking skills to understand that people
> who call people sick who aren't sick have issues of their own.

A deft bit of disjunctive syllogism there. (The irony of it all.) Bravo Jenn!

> Anyway, have a nice day and don't worry be happy.

I am quite amused at this half- uhm, hearted missive of yours.


GeoSynch

[Lionel]

GeoSynch a écrit :

> Don't tell me ... let me guess

ROTFLMAO !
So try that http://www.goddessflight.com/
You will have more chance than with the IP address.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"GeoSynch" blabbed:

> Jenn jabbered:
>
> >> > I believe that people who believe that gays and lesbians have an illness
> >> > are ill.
>
> >> That's about as vapid as "Mean people suck." Another fine example of
> >> our indoctrination-laden public education system.
>
> > Mean people do suck, and I had completed public education way before gay
> > issues were ever mentioned.
>
> Don't tell me ... let me guess: you're a tree-hugging, MoveOn.org-supporting,
> Kerry-voting, America-hating, dyed-in-the-wool bleeding heart liberal, no?

Yes, except for the America-hating part.

>
> > I simply have good enough critical thinking skills to understand that
> > people
> > who call people sick who aren't sick have issues of their own.
>
> A deft bit of disjunctive syllogism there. (The irony of it all.) Bravo Jenn!

Thanks. Let me guess: you're a Hannity-watching, Bush-voting,
Coulter-reading, America-hating, Ditto-head, no?

>
> > Anyway, have a nice day and don't worry be happy.
>
> I am quite amused at this half- uhm, hearted missive of yours.

The last bit was an attempt at humor.

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said to Stynchblob:

> Thanks. Let me guess: you're a Hannity-watching, Bush-voting,
> Coulter-reading, America-hating, Ditto-head, no?

I think you got it! And don't forget Bible-pounding, intolerance-spewing,
gun-toting, and race-baiting. Not to mention that Styncho just lost a
round of snaps to Lionella, of all people.

[GeoSynch]

Fifi the French poodle yapped:

> Are you experienced ?
> Let us know... ;-)

Are you inane?
We already know.


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Jenn rejoined:

>> Don't tell me ... let me guess: you're a tree-hugging, MoveOn.org-supporting,
>> Kerry-voting, America-hating, dyed-in-the-wool bleeding heart liberal, no?

> Yes, except for the America-hating part.

I would've substituted Air America-listening except they'll probably be out of
business before you know it. Stealing food out of the mouth of babies - how
low can you get?

>> > I simply have good enough critical thinking skills to understand that
>> > people who call people sick who aren't sick have issues of their own.

>> A deft bit of disjunctive syllogism there. (The irony of it all.) Bravo Jenn!

> Thanks.

You're very, very welcome. ;-)

> Let me guess: you're a Hannity-watching, Bush-voting,
> Coulter-reading, America-hating, Ditto-head, no?

Affirmative on the first three. "America-hating"??!! Need I remind you,
dearie, that it's you liberals who sided with the communists during the
Cold War and you now side the Islamofascits in the terror war?
Yes, indeed, you're quite the comedienne there, Jenn. And on the last
one, I don't listen to AM radio (reception is lousy in SoCal) but I did
manage to hear Rush on Hannity & Colmes last week and it was great.

>> > Anyway, have a nice day and don't worry be happy.

>> I am quite amused at this half- uhm, hearted missive of yours.

> The last bit was an attempt at humor.

And it was even funnier than you think.


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Boy George wistfully gazed across the distance behind lavender-tinged specs:

> Jenn said:

>> Thanks. Let me guess: you're a Hannity-watching, Bush-voting,
>> Coulter-reading, America-hating, Ditto-head, no?

> I think you got it! And don't forget ...

So, 'lil Georgie, why did your family disown you and force you to change
your last name? Every time we ask that question, you scurry like a scalded
rat, except - that being a gimp - you skeedaddle in seemingly slow-motion.


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Fifi the French poodle does another Jerry Lewis pratfall:

>>>>>Too bad, now you will need to wash your brain with blessed water.

>>>>"At least" I have one...

>>>Sorry I prefer to be deprived than to suffer brainwashing. :-)

>> Thanks for admitting you're brainless, something we've suspected all along.

> Why do you say "we" ? How many are you in your schizophrenia ?

Can you name a single person on rao who doesn't think you're harebrained?

> Anyway the clown is as mediocre as the I.S engineer. ;-)

.... said the clueless, emoticon-addicted buffoon.


GeoSynch

[Lionel]

GeoStink wrote :

> Fifi the French poodle does another Jerry Lewis pratfall:
>
>
>>>>>>Too bad, now you will need to wash your brain with blessed water.
>
>
>>>>>"At least" I have one...
>
>
>>>>Sorry I prefer to be deprived than to suffer brainwashing. :-)
>
>
>>>Thanks for admitting you're brainless, something we've suspected all along.
>
>
>>Why do you say "we" ? How many are you in your schizophrenia ?
>
>
> Can you name a single person on rao who doesn't think you're harebrained?


You have also noted that ? ;-)

But BTW why should I care, eh ?
You are really too much ego focused sweet little baby.
This surely explains your disproportionate emotional answer when I have
demonstrated that you were unable to trace correctly an IP address. Note
that if you haven't pretended to be a specialist of the informations
systems... :-)
This also explain why you seem to give so much importance to the fact
that I should *envy* you.
Your whole social, professionnal and religious life is just an answer to
the tyrannic exigencies of your petty inflated ego.


>>Anyway the clown is as mediocre as the I.S engineer. ;-)
>
>
> ... said the clueless, emoticon-addicted buffoon.

And you are still making me the charity of an intelligent answer... :o)

[Lionel]

GeoStink wrote :

> Fifi the French poodle yapped:
>
>
>>Are you experienced ?
>>Let us know... ;-)
>
>
> Are you inane?
> We already know.

I don't care... I just note that you haven't the balls to define what
are the "abominative practices" you are speaking about.
On RAO you're just acting like a bivalve mollusk. What an exciting life
you have. ;-)

Note that on RAO I don't remember to have written some more outrageous
words than your "abominative practises".
What a sorry sad life you have dirty little mollusk.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"GeoSynch" > came back with:

> Jenn rejoined:
>
> >> Don't tell me ... let me guess: you're a tree-hugging,
> >> MoveOn.org-supporting,
> >> Kerry-voting, America-hating, dyed-in-the-wool bleeding heart liberal, no?
>
> > Yes, except for the America-hating part.
>
> I would've substituted Air America-listening except they'll probably be out
> of
> business before you know it. Stealing food out of the mouth of babies - how
> low can you get?

Well, we'll see about that.

>
> >> > I simply have good enough critical thinking skills to understand that
> >> > people who call people sick who aren't sick have issues of their own.
>
> >> A deft bit of disjunctive syllogism there. (The irony of it all.) Bravo
> >> Jenn!
>
> > Thanks.
>
> You're very, very welcome. ;-)
>
> > Let me guess: you're a Hannity-watching, Bush-voting,
> > Coulter-reading, America-hating, Ditto-head, no?
>
> Affirmative on the first three. "America-hating"??!! Need I remind you,
> dearie, that it's you liberals who sided with the communists during the
> Cold War

Gee, no liberal who I know did that.

> and you now side the Islamofascits in the terror war?

Gee, no liberal who I know does that. But I do understand how that
statement sells well with your crowd.


> Yes, indeed, you're quite the comedienne there, Jenn. And on the last
> one, I don't listen to AM radio (reception is lousy in SoCal) but I did
> manage to hear Rush on Hannity & Colmes last week and it was great.
>
> >> > Anyway, have a nice day and don't worry be happy.
>
> >> I am quite amused at this half- uhm, hearted missive of yours.
>
> > The last bit was an attempt at humor.
>
> And it was even funnier than you think.
>
>
> GeoSynch

[Lionel]

George Minus Middius a écrit :

> ....Not to mention that Styncho just lost a
> round of snaps to Lionella, of all people.

So what ?
This didn't kill you.

[George Middius]

Lionella puled:

>> ....Not to mention that Styncho just lost a
>> round of snaps to Lionella, of all people.

>So what ?

It's just a way of showing how feeble Stynchie is. I'm not surprised my point
escaped you. <G>




..
..
..
..

[Lionel]

George Middius a écrit :
> Lionella puled:
>
>
>>>....Not to mention that Styncho just lost a
>>>round of snaps to Lionella, of all people.
>
>
>>So what ?
>
>
> It's just a way of showing how feeble Stynchie is. I'm not surprised my point
> escaped you. <G>

:o)

[GeoSynch]

Jenn wades in the Egypt river:

>> I would've substituted Air America-listening except they'll probably be out
>> of business before you know it. Stealing food out of the mouth of babies -
>> how low can you get?

> Well, we'll see about that.

A nice index of the Air America money scandal completely ignored by the
ossified dinosaurs in the mainstream media:
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003624.htm

>> > Let me guess: you're a Hannity-watching, Bush-voting,
>> > Coulter-reading, America-hating, Ditto-head, no?

>> Affirmative on the first three. "America-hating"??!! Need I remind you,
>> dearie, that it's you liberals who sided with the communists during the
>> Cold War

> Gee, no liberal who I know did that.

Perhaps you weren't friends with 'Hanoi Jane' Fonda then or
International ANSWER now?

>> and you now side the Islamofascits in the terror war?

> Gee, no liberal who I know does that. But I do understand how that
> statement sells well with your crowd.

I guess those aren't your liberal friends at the ACLU down at Gitmo
coaching detained terrorists (who would slit your throat, Jenn, without
remorse in an instant).


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Fifi the French poodle does the ankle-biting thang:

>> Are you inane?
>> We already know.

> I don't care...

Such little self-respect and you wonder why you're treated like a
laughingstock and buffoon...

> I just note that you haven't the balls to define what are the "abominative
> practices" you are speaking about.

I've been through this too many times before and I've no desire to slog
further on it with an insignificant twerp.

> On RAO you're just acting like a bivalve mollusk. What an exciting life you
> have. ;-)

The significance of this is only apparent to an envious little old man who
toils in the sewers of Paris for a living. How sweet it is! ;-)


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Fifi the French poodle chases his tail:

>>>>>Sorry I prefer to be deprived than to suffer brainwashing. :-)

>>>>Thanks for admitting you're brainless, something we've suspected all along.

>>>Why do you say "we" ? How many are you in your schizophrenia ?

>> Can you name a single person on rao who doesn't think you're harebrained?

> You have also noted that ? ;-)

You deem your harebrainedness a badge of honor? Well, good for you! ;-)

> But BTW why should I care, eh ?

Indeed, why shouldn't retards like you indulge in unwarranted self-esteem?

> You are really too much ego focused sweet little baby.

Have you been hanging around with Boy George, talking like that?

> This surely explains your disproportionate emotional answer when I have
> demonstrated that you were unable to trace correctly an IP address. Note that
> if you haven't pretended to be a specialist of the informations systems... :-)

Small victory, little man, highlight of your year ... yada, yada, yada.

> This also explain why you seem to give so much importance to the fact that I
> should *envy* you.

Working in the sewers of Paris is a noble profession, you convince yourself.

> Your whole social, professionnal and religious life is just an answer to the
> tyrannic exigencies of your petty inflated ego.

A whole bunch of words that don't mean a darn thing, but make you feel
good about yourself for having written them. Good for you, little old man.

>>>Anyway the clown is as mediocre as the I.S engineer. ;-)

>> ... said the clueless, emoticon-addicted buffoon.

> And you are still making me the charity of an intelligent answer... :o)

Perhaps if you could formulate an intelligent question...


GeoSynch

[Jenn]

In article >,
"GeoSynch" > wrote:

> Jenn wades in the Egypt river:
>
> >> I would've substituted Air America-listening except they'll probably be out
> >> of business before you know it. Stealing food out of the mouth of babies -
> >> how low can you get?
>
> > Well, we'll see about that.
>
> A nice index of the Air America money scandal completely ignored by the
> ossified dinosaurs in the mainstream media:
> http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003624.htm

I'll look into it, hopefully from a less biased source than Malkin.

>
> >> > Let me guess: you're a Hannity-watching, Bush-voting,
> >> > Coulter-reading, America-hating, Ditto-head, no?
>
> >> Affirmative on the first three. "America-hating"??!! Need I remind you,
> >> dearie, that it's you liberals who sided with the communists during the
> >> Cold War
>
> > Gee, no liberal who I know did that.
>
> Perhaps you weren't friends with 'Hanoi Jane' Fonda then or
> International ANSWER now?

No, I don't know Fonda personally, sorry. I've never heard of
International ANSWER, so I looked them up. They look a bit radical for
me. But my point is clear: your average liberal no more "sided with
communists" than the average conservative sided with Tim McVeigh.
>
> >> and you now side the Islamofascits in the terror war?
>
> > Gee, no liberal who I know does that. But I do understand how that
> > statement sells well with your crowd.
>
> I guess those aren't your liberal friends at the ACLU down at Gitmo
> coaching detained terrorists (who would slit your throat, Jenn, without
> remorse in an instant).

Coaching them, Geo? Site? So, you think that since I'm liberal that I
"side with the Islamofascits" (sic)? What an odd way to look at life.
Since you are conservative, do you side with the KKK? BTW, I very much
agree about the throat slitting.

If you would like to discuss this further, I'd be happy to, elsewhere.
Here is not the place.
>
>
> GeoSynch

[Lionel]

GeoGag is making us some revelations about his childhood :

>>I just note that you haven't the balls to define what are the "abominative
>>practices" you are speaking about.
>
>
> I've been through this too many times

I agree. Considering your behaviour, your fears and your obvious sexual
desorders I think that you have been through too much "abominative
practices".


>>On RAO you're just acting like a bivalve mollusk. What an exciting life you
>>have. ;-)
>
>
> The significance of this is only apparent to an envious little old man who
> toils in the sewers of Paris for a living. How sweet it is! ;-)


I agree. I have demonstrated that the French sewers worker is more
competent than an alleged Californian IS engineer. This is really sweet
! ;-)

[Lionel]

Geogag tries again :


>>You are really too much ego focused sweet little baby.
>
>
> Have you been hanging around with Boy George, talking like that?


I don't know any Boy George.
You are our little Lolita specialist of the Pop music.


>>This surely explains your disproportionate emotional answer when I have
>>demonstrated that you were unable to trace correctly an IP address. Note that
>>if you haven't pretended to be a specialist of the informations systems... :-)
>
>
> Small victory, little man, highlight of your year ... yada, yada, yada.


Perhaps but your insistance is just showing us that it has also been the
humiliation of your year.... And it's really sweet to me. :-)


>>This also explain why you seem to give so much importance to the fact that I
>>should *envy* you.
>
>
> Working in the sewers of Paris is a noble profession, you convince yourself.

Not stupid professions just stupid persons.
In other words it's better to be a serious sewer worker than a pitiful
"IS engineer".
I remember that these are the bases of the Christian definition of the
human labor. Don't tell me that you don't remember all these stories
about the charpenter, fishermen and other herdsmen...
Seems to me that you are the class dunce in computer network but also in
theology.
Stay tuned I will try to help you.

>>Your whole social, professionnal and religious life is just an answer to the
>>tyrannic exigencies of your petty inflated ego.
>
>
> A whole bunch of words that don't mean a darn thing, but make you feel
> good about yourself for having written them. Good for you, little old man.

>
>>>>Anyway the clown is as mediocre as the I.S engineer. ;-)
>
>
>>>... said the clueless, emoticon-addicted buffoon.
>
>
>>And you are still making me the charity of an intelligent answer... :o)
>
>
> Perhaps if you could formulate an intelligent question...

That you will not understand ?
Just try to read me carefully I am trying to make you grow. ;-)

....Note that there wasn't any question.

[MINe 109]

In article
>,
Jenn > wrote:

> > A nice index of the Air America money scandal completely ignored by the
> > ossified dinosaurs in the mainstream media:
> > http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003624.htm
>
> I'll look into it, hopefully from a less biased source than Malkin.

It's about Air America's first financial backer, the one who
misrepresented how much money he really had to support the new network.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_America-Gloria_Wise_loan_controversy

Stephen

[GeoSynch]

Jenn wrote:

>> A nice index of the Air America money scandal completely ignored by the
>> ossified dinosaurs in the mainstream media:
>> http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003624.htm

> I'll look into it, hopefully from a less biased source than Malkin.

Franken's cracking up, what with his recent Amazon book ad.

>> Perhaps you weren't friends with 'Hanoi Jane' Fonda then or
>> International ANSWER now?

> No, I don't know Fonda personally, sorry. I've never heard of
> International ANSWER, so I looked them up. They look a bit radical for
> me. But my point is clear: your average liberal no more "sided with
> communists" than the average conservative sided with Tim McVeigh.

McVeigh and Nichols were unwitting white-bread dupes for their Iraqi
terrorist handlers. Search Google for Jayna Davis, who covered the story
extensively for the local news in OK City and wrote a book about it.

>> >> and you now side the Islamofascits in the terror war?

>> > Gee, no liberal who I know does that. But I do understand how that
>> > statement sells well with your crowd.
>>
>> I guess those aren't your liberal friends at the ACLU down at Gitmo
>> coaching detained terrorists (who would slit your throat, Jenn, without
>> remorse in an instant).

> Coaching them, Geo? Site?

See this http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46208

and also straight from the terrorist's mouthpiece's site:
http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=16924&c=206
http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=16956&c=206

> So, you think that since I'm liberal that I
> "side with the Islamofascits" (sic)? What an odd way to look at life.
> Since you are conservative, do you side with the KKK?

No, but Robert Byrd, the Democrat Senator, once did.

> BTW, I very much agree about the throat slitting.

> If you would like to discuss this further, I'd be happy to, elsewhere.
> Here is not the place.

That would be super. I look forward to hearing more from you.
My e-mail address is: GeoSynch at EarthLink dot Net


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Fifi LeFreude ponderously pulls on his pipe:

>> I've been through this too many times

> I agree. Considering your behaviour, your fears and your obvious sexual
> desorders I think that you have been through too much "abominative practices".

Since you've proven stupendously inept at everything you've endeavored -
save for trafficking in human waste deep in the bowel's of Paris sewers,
which you're amazingly well-suited for - might as well add Psychobabble
Spouter to that ever-expanding list. That makes you quite the idiot-savant.

>>>On RAO you're just acting like a bivalve mollusk. What an exciting life you
>>>have. ;-)

>> The significance of this is only apparent to an envious little old man who
>> toils in the sewers of Paris for a living. How sweet it is! ;-)

> I agree. I have demonstrated that the French sewers worker is more competent
> than an alleged Californian IS engineer. This is really sweet

Thanks for once again admitting your profession, small victory, little old man.
:-)


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Fifi the French poodle soiled the carpet:

>>>You are really too much ego focused sweet little baby.

>> Have you been hanging around with Boy George, talking like that?

> I don't know any Boy George.

Does the word Lionella ring a bell, Fifi?

> You are our little Lolita specialist of the Pop music.

Being Eurotrash, your depravity knows no bounds.

>>>This surely explains your disproportionate emotional answer when I have
>>>demonstrated that you were unable to trace correctly an IP address. Note that
>>>if you haven't pretended to be a specialist of the informations systems...
>>>:-)

>> Small victory, little man, highlight of your year ... yada, yada, yada.

> Perhaps but your insistance is just showing us that it has also been the
> humiliation of your year.... And it's really sweet to me. :-)

You're going to twist yourself into a pretzel with such illogical
rationalizations,
but since when have the French ever been logical, or rational, for that matter?

>>>This also explain why you seem to give so much importance to the fact that I
>>>should *envy* you.

>> Working in the sewers of Paris is a noble profession, you convince yourself.

> Not stupid professions just stupid persons.
> In other words it's better to be a serious sewer worker than a pitiful "IS
> engineer".

Thanks for once again admitting to the world that you're nothing more than
a sewer worker, but don't be mad, for someone's got to do it, and you are
without doubt the most qualified person for that sort of work.

> I remember that these are the bases of the Christian definition of the human
> labor. Don't tell me that you don't remember all these stories about the
> charpenter, fishermen and other herdsmen...

I'm immune to anti-Christian bigotry, as it only reflect the smallness of
the other person who engages in it, like you, little old man.

> Seems to me that you are the class dunce in computer network but also in
> theology.

Small victory, little man, highlight of your year ... yada, yada, yada.


GeoSynch

[Lionel]

GeoStink a écrit :

> I'm immune to anti-Christian bigotry, as it only reflect the smallness of
> the other person who engages in it, like you, little old man.

In the same time you have also immuned yourself against the real life...
But it's not a big loss.
Do you know that you strangely sound like Usama Bin Laden ?
He said *exactly* the same thing about the people that he calls "infidels".
I'm sure you are happy to share that with him. ;-)

[Lionel]

GeoGag wrote :

> Small victory, little man, highlight of your year ... yada, yada, yada.

Blah, blah, blah... :-)

[Lionel]

GeoStink wrote :

> but since when have the French ever been logical, or rational, for that matter?

An other demonstration of childish xenophobic generalization.
Does this also belong to your disguise of perfect Christian ?

[Lionel]

GeoGag wrote :

> Thanks for once again admitting to the world that you're nothing more than
> a sewer worker, but don't be mad, for someone's got to do it, and you are
> without doubt the most qualified person for that sort of work.

I am immune to your professional mytho-megalomaniac envy, but at least,
unlike you, I am the most qualified person to do *my* job.
This is the very origin of this discussion. ;-)

[paul packer]

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:31:40 +0200, Lionel >
wrote:

>GeoGag wrote :
>
>> Thanks for once again admitting to the world that you're nothing more than
>> a sewer worker, but don't be mad, for someone's got to do it, and you are
>> without doubt the most qualified person for that sort of work.
>
>I am immune to your professional mytho-megalomaniac envy, but at least,
>unlike you, I am the most qualified person to do *my* job.
>This is the very origin of this discussion. ;-)

Is there something wrong with my Reader or are you the only person in
this thread?

[Lionel]

paul packer a écrit :
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:31:40 +0200, Lionel >
> wrote:
>
>
>>GeoGag wrote :
>>
>>
>>>Thanks for once again admitting to the world that you're nothing more than
>>>a sewer worker, but don't be mad, for someone's got to do it, and you are
>>>without doubt the most qualified person for that sort of work.
>>
>>I am immune to your professional mytho-megalomaniac envy, but at least,
>>unlike you, I am the most qualified person to do *my* job.
>>This is the very origin of this discussion. ;-)
>
>
> Is there something wrong with my Reader or are you the only person in
> this thread?

I love to shell the bivalves mollusks.
Try nevertheless to fix your newsreader.

[GeoSynch]

Fifi the French poodle throws a hissy fit:

>> I'm immune to anti-Christian bigotry, as it only reflect the smallness of
>> the other person who engages in it, like you, little old man.

> In the same time you have also immuned yourself against the real life... But
> it's not a big loss.
> Do you know that you strangely sound like Usama Bin Laden ?
> He said *exactly* the same thing about the people that he calls "infidels".
> I'm sure you are happy to share that with him. ;-)

What more ...


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Fifi the French poodle throws a hissy fit:

>> Small victory, little man, highlight of your year ... yada, yada, yada.
>
> Blah, blah, blah... :-)

to say ...


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Fifi the French poodle throws a hissy fit:

>> but since when have the French ever been logical, or rational, for that
>> matter?

> An other demonstration of childish xenophobic generalization.
> Does this also belong to your disguise of perfect Christian ?

except...


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Fifi the French poodle throws a hissy fit:

>> Thanks for once again admitting to the world that you're nothing more than
>> a sewer worker, but don't be mad, for someone's got to do it, and you are
>> without doubt the most qualified person for that sort of work.

> I am immune to your professional mytho-megalomaniac envy, but at least, unlike
> you, I am the most qualified person to do *my* job.
> This is the very origin of this discussion. ;-)

"Cha-CHINGGGG!!!"

Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!!


GeoSynch

[Lionel]

GeoBigot wrote :

> Fifi the French poodle throws a hissy fit:
>
>
>>>I'm immune to anti-Christian bigotry, as it only reflect the smallness of
>>>the other person who engages in it, like you, little old man.
>
>
>>In the same time you have also immuned yourself against the real life... But
>>it's not a big loss.
>>Do you know that you strangely sound like Usama Bin Laden ?
>>He said *exactly* the same thing about the people that he calls "infidels".
>>I'm sure you are happy to share that with him. ;-)
>
>
> What more?

Nothing.
When do you leave for one of his training camps ?

[Lionel]

GeoSynch a écrit :
> Fifi the French poodle throws a hissy fit:
>
>
>>>Small victory, little man, highlight of your year ... yada, yada, yada.
>>
>>Blah, blah, blah... :-)
>
>
> to say ...

Seems to me that our bivalves mollusk is in shutting phase. ;-)

[Lionel]

GeoSynch a écrit :
> Fifi the French poodle throws a hissy fit:
>
>
>>>but since when have the French ever been logical, or rational, for that
>>>matter?
>
>
>>An other demonstration of childish xenophobic generalization.
>>Does this also belong to your disguise of perfect Christian ?
>
>
> except...

I'm still waiting for the closing noise.

[Lionel]

GeoStink a écrit :

> Fifi the French poodle throws a hissy fit:
>
>
>>>Thanks for once again admitting to the world that you're nothing more than
>>>a sewer worker, but don't be mad, for someone's got to do it, and you are
>>>without doubt the most qualified person for that sort of work.
>
>
>>I am immune to your professional mytho-megalomaniac envy, but at least, unlike
>>you, I am the most qualified person to do *my* job.
>>This is the very origin of this discussion. ;-)
>
>
> "Cha-CHINGGGG!!!"

Do you hear ?
Now the bivalve mollusk is hermetically closed.
It looks strong and solid now.

[GeoSynch]

Froggy conceded:

>>>>I'm immune to anti-Christian bigotry, as it only reflect the smallness of
>>>>the other person who engages in it, like you, little old man.

>>>In the same time you have also immuned yourself against the real life... But

>> What more ...

> Nothing.

Game,


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Froggy conceded:

>>>>Small victory, little man, highlight of your year ... yada, yada, yada.

>>>Blah, blah, blah... :-)

>> to say ...

> Seems to me that our bivalves mollusk is in shutting phase. ;-)

set


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Froggy conceded:

>>>>but since when have the French ever been logical, or rational, for that
>>>>matter?

>>>An other demonstration of childish xenophobic generalization.

>> except...

> I'm still waiting for the closing noise.

and


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Froggy conceded:

>>>>Thanks for once again admitting to the world that you're nothing more than
>>>>a sewer worker, but don't be mad, for someone's got to do it, and you are
>>>>without doubt the most qualified person for that sort of work.
>>
>>>I am immune to your professional mytho-megalomaniac envy, but at least,
>>>unlike

>> "Cha-CHINGGGG!!!"

> Do you hear ?

match!


GeoSynch

[GeoSinch]

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:52:51 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:

>Froggy conceded:
>
>>>>>Thanks for once again admitting to the world that you're nothing more than
>>>>>a sewer worker, but don't be mad, for someone's got to do it, and you are
>>>>>without doubt the most qualified person for that sort of work.
>>>
>>>>I am immune to your professional mytho-megalomaniac envy, but at least,
>>>>unlike
>
>>> "Cha-CHINGGGG!!!"
>
>> Do you hear ?
>
>match!
>
>
>GeoSynch
>

and a complete waste of cyberspace and newsgroup postings.

[Lionel]

GeoStink wrote :


> match!

Just a last stinky gaseous release.