My apologies to the group

[Bob Morein]

I have previously identified Arny Krueger as a "bad scientist", but I
thought he had a pretty good hold on fundamentals. Now, with his claim that
"thermal runaway" and "secondary breakdown", which occur in bipolar
transistors, are separate phenomena, I realize that he is fundamentally
ignorant as well. Apparently, Krueger manages to fake knowledgeabilty by
abstracting papers.

In this case, I am forced to quote a lengthy paragraph from The Art of
Electronics, 2nd Edition, by Horowitz and Hill, page 159.

"In the case of the bipolar power transistor, the postive temperature
coefficient of collector courrent at fixed V_BE (approximately 9%/degree C,
see section 2.10) means that a local hot spot in the junction will have a
higher current density, thus producing additional heating. At sufficiently
high V_CE and I_C, this "current hogging" can cause local thermal runaway",
known as second breakdown (it). As a result, bipolar power transistors are
limited to a "safe operating area" (on a plot of collector current versus
collector voltage) smaller than that allowed by transistor power dissipation
alone (we'll see more of this in Chapter 6). The important point here is
that the negative (it) temperature coefficient of MOS drain current
(Fig.3.13) prevents these junction hot spots entirely."

From http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/AN1628-D.PDF
there are exactly THREE breakdown mechanisms in bipolar junction
transistors:
1. Thermal
2. Tunneling effect
3. Avalanche multiplication.

There is no "fouth mechanism" that would allow "thermal runaway" and
"secondary breakdown" to exist as separate mechanisms.

Arny, I was a Ph.D candidate in theoretical physics. That means I passed all
the coursework required for the Ph.D, as well as the qualifying and
comprehensive exams. I had three graduate courses in solid state physics,
and three in quantum mechanics. But I don't need to refer to my coursework
to know that you are an asshole.

To the group:
I apologize for whatever appearance of respect I may have given this person
in the past. He is an intellectually dishonest person. But additionally,
this man has polarized all of you into two camps. He has put you at each
other's throats, when you should be appreciative of what the other "side"
has to offer.

[Lionel]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Bob Morein said:
>

[...]

>>But additionally,
>>this man has polarized all of you into two camps. He has put you at each
>>other's throats, when you should be appreciative of what the other "side"
>>has to offer.
>
>
> [...]You're either with us or against us, and any
> accommodation you make to the *******s means you're *against* us.
>
>

You see Bob there's still a long way to go, insn't it ?

[Bob Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius wrote:
> >
> > Bob Morein said:
> >
>
> [...]
>
> >>But additionally,
> >>this man has polarized all of you into two camps. He has put you at each
> >>other's throats, when you should be appreciative of what the other
"side"
> >>has to offer.
> >
> >
> > [...]You're either with us or against us, and any
> > accommodation you make to the *******s means you're *against* us.
> >
> >
>
> You see Bob there's still a long way to go, insn't it ?
>
I think that the only way for the group to depolarize would be if Arny
Krueger vanished, which isn't going to happen.
As we discussed previously, it's possible that if Krueger weren't here,
George would never have thought so deeply about the subject as to become
polarized himself. I have no idea what George would be like. Consider the
following irony: some people have drawn conclusions about my personality
from my altercation with Brian L. McCarty which to me are totally
unwarranted. The occasional individual who doesn't understand what McCarty
is prompts in me a strong urge to provide an immediate education.

The two kinds of thought -- subjective appreciation and quantitative
analysis -- happily coexist in my mind, scratching each other's back, and
helping each other achieve their goals.

[Lionel]

Bob Morein wrote:

> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>George M. Middius wrote:
>>
>>>Bob Morein said:
>>>
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>
>>>>But additionally,
>>>>this man has polarized all of you into two camps. He has put you at each
>>>>other's throats, when you should be appreciative of what the other
>
> "side"
>
>>>>has to offer.
>>>
>>>
>>>[...]You're either with us or against us, and any
>>>accommodation you make to the *******s means you're *against* us.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>You see Bob there's still a long way to go, insn't it ?
>>
>
> I think that the only way for the group to depolarize would be if Arny
> Krueger vanished, which isn't going to happen.
> As we discussed previously, it's possible that if Krueger weren't here,
> George would never have thought so deeply about the subject as to become
> polarized himself. I have no idea what George would be like. Consider the
> following irony: some people have drawn conclusions about my personality
> from my altercation with Brian L. McCarty which to me are totally
> unwarranted. The occasional individual who doesn't understand what McCarty
> is prompts in me a strong urge to provide an immediate education.
>
> The two kinds of thought -- subjective appreciation and quantitative
> analysis -- happily coexist in my mind, scratching each other's back, and
> helping each other achieve their goals.
>
>
>
I understand. This is the always true "2 faces of the medal".
I'm just afraid by a guy who proclames to be, to show the quiet, good,
ideal way.
I just want to point that it's the daily Middius' behaviour.
This guy is like Krueger, same leitmotiv : if you are not with me you
are against me.

Thank you for your time.

[Bob Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Bob Morein wrote:
>
> > "Lionel" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>George M. Middius wrote:
> >>
> >>>Bob Morein said:
> >>>
> >>
> >>[...]
> >>
> >>
> >>>>But additionally,
> >>>>this man has polarized all of you into two camps. He has put you at
each
> >>>>other's throats, when you should be appreciative of what the other
> >
> > "side"
> >
> >>>>has to offer.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>[...]You're either with us or against us, and any
> >>>accommodation you make to the *******s means you're *against* us.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>You see Bob there's still a long way to go, insn't it ?
> >>
> >
> > I think that the only way for the group to depolarize would be if Arny
> > Krueger vanished, which isn't going to happen.
> > As we discussed previously, it's possible that if Krueger weren't here,
> > George would never have thought so deeply about the subject as to become
> > polarized himself. I have no idea what George would be like. Consider
the
> > following irony: some people have drawn conclusions about my personality
> > from my altercation with Brian L. McCarty which to me are totally
> > unwarranted. The occasional individual who doesn't understand what
McCarty
> > is prompts in me a strong urge to provide an immediate education.
> >
> > The two kinds of thought -- subjective appreciation and quantitative
> > analysis -- happily coexist in my mind, scratching each other's back,
and
> > helping each other achieve their goals.
> >
> >
> >
> I understand. This is the always true "2 faces of the medal".
> I'm just afraid by a guy who proclames to be, to show the quiet, good,
> ideal way.
> I just want to point that it's the daily Middius' behaviour.
> This guy is like Krueger, same leitmotiv : if you are not with me you
> are against me.
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
rec.audio.prophets :).

[Bob Morein]

Arny, I was a Ph.D candidate in theoretical physics. That means I passed all
the coursework required for the Ph.D, as well as the qualifying and
comprehensive exams. However the practical application of this knowledge,
embodied in the required doctoral thesis, proved that I didn't know a
****ing thing and Drexel, after several years of trying to figure out what
was wrong, ejected my sorry ass. I sued them and lost, took it to appeal
and lost, and even (with daddy's money) got some sick lawyer to appeal to
the US Supreme Court. I understand that Clarence Thomas himself laughed his
ass off when he saw what a moron I am.

But that's another story altogether.


Bob Morein


http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/ledgerenquirer/news/4853918.htm

> Doctoral student takes intellectual property case to Supreme Court
> By L. STUART DITZEN
> Philadelphia Inquirer
>
> PHILADELPHIA -Even the professors who dismissed him from a doctoral program
> at Drexel University agreed that Robert Morein was uncommonly smart.
>
> They apparently didn't realize that he was uncommonly stubborn too - so much
> so that he would mount a court fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court
> to challenge his dismissal.

The Supremes have already rejected this appeal, btw.
>
> "It's a personality trait I have - I'm a tenacious guy," said Morein, a
> pleasantly eccentric man regarded by friends as an inventive genius. "And we
> do come to a larger issue here."

An "inventive genius" that has never invented anything. And hardly
"pleasantly" eccentric.

> A five-year legal battle between this unusual ex-student and one of
> Philadelphia's premier educational institutions has gone largely unnoticed
> by the media and the public.

Because no one gives a **** about a 50 year old loser.
>
> But it has been the subject of much attention in academia.
>
> Drexel says it dismissed Morein in 1995 because he failed, after eight
> years, to complete a thesis required for a doctorate in electrical and
> computer engineering.

Not to mention the 12 years it took him to get thru high school!
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

>
> Morein, 50, of Dresher, Pa., contends that he was dismissed only after his
> thesis adviser "appropriated" an innovative idea Morein had developed in a
> rarefied area of thought called "estimation theory" and arranged to have it
> patented.

A contention rejected by three courts. From a 50 YEAR OLD that has
done NOTHING PRODUCTIVE with his life.

>
> In February 2000, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Esther R. Sylvester
> ruled that Morein's adviser indeed had taken his idea.

An idea that was worth nothing, because it didn't work. Just like
Robert Morein, who has never worked a day in his life.

>
> Sylvester held that Morein had been unjustly dismissed and she ordered
> Drexel to reinstate him or refund his tuition.

Funnily enough, Drexel AGREED to reinstate Morein, who rejected the
offer because he knew he was and IS a failed loser. Spending daddy's
money to cover up his lack of productivity.
>
> That brought roars of protest from the lions of academia. There is a long
> tradition in America of noninterference by the courts in academic decisions.
>
> Backed by every major university in Pennsylvania and organizations
> representing thousands of others around the country, Drexel appealed to the
> state Superior Court.
>
> The appellate court, by a 2-1 vote, reversed Sylvester in June 2001 and
> restored the status quo. Morein was, once again, out at Drexel. And the
> time-honored axiom that courts ought to keep their noses out of academic
> affairs was reasserted.
>
> The state Supreme Court declined to review the case and, in an ordinary
> litigation, that would have been the end of it.
>
> But Morein, in a quixotic gesture that goes steeply against the odds, has
> asked the highest court in the land to give him a hearing.

Daddy throws more money down the crapper.

> His attorney, Faye Riva Cohen, said the Supreme Court appeal is important
> even if it fails because it raises the issue of whether a university has a
> right to lay claim to a student's ideas - or intellectual property - without
> compensation.
>
> "Any time you are in a Ph.D. program, you are a serf, you are a slave," said
> Cohen. Morein "is concerned not only for himself. He feels that what
> happened to him is pretty common."

It's called HIGHER EDUCATION, honey. The students aren't in charge,
the UNIVERSITY and PROFESSORS are.


> Drexel's attorney, Neil J. Hamburg, called Morein's appeal - and his claim
> that his idea was stolen - "preposterous."
>
> "I will eat my shoe if the Supreme Court hears this case," declared Hamburg.
> "We're not even going to file a response. He is a brilliant guy, but his
> intelligence should be used for the advancement of society rather than
> pursuing self-destructive litigation."

No **** sherlock.

> The litigation began in 1997, when Morein sued Drexel claiming that a
> committee of professors had dumped him after he accused his faculty adviser,
> Paul Kalata, of appropriating his idea.
>
> His concept was considered to have potential value for businesses in
> minutely measuring the internal functions of machines, industrial processes
> and electronic systems.
>
> The field of "estimation theory" is one in which scientists attempt to
> calculate what they cannot plainly observe, such as the inside workings of a
> nuclear plant or a computer.

My estimation theory? There is NO brain at work inside the head of
Robert Morein, only sawdust.

>
> Prior to Morein's dismissal, Drexel looked into his complaint against Kalata
> and concluded that the associate professor had done nothing wrong. Kalata,
> through a university lawyer, declined to comment.
>
> At a nonjury trial before Sylvester in 1999, Morein testified that Kalata in
> 1990 had posed a technical problem for him to study for his thesis. It
> related to estimation theory.
>
> Kalata, who did not appear at the trial, said in a 1998 deposition that a
> Cherry Hill company for which he was a paid consultant, K-Tron
> International, had asked him to develop an alternate estimation method for
> it. The company manufactures bulk material feeders and conveyors used in
> industrial processes.
>
> Morein testified that, after much study, he experienced "a flash of
> inspiration" and came up with a novel mathematical concept to address the
> problem Kalata had presented.
>
> Without his knowledge, Morein said, Kalata shared the idea with K-Tron.
>
> K-Tron then applied for a patent, listing Kalata and Morein as co-inventors.
>
> Morein said he agreed "under duress" to the arrangement, but felt "locked
> into a highly disadvantageous situation." As a result, he testified, he
> became alienated from Kalata.
>
> As events unfolded, Kalata signed over his interest in the patent to K-Tron.
> The company never capitalized on the technology and eventually allowed the
> patent to lapse. No one made any money from it.

Because it was bogus. Even Kalata was mortified that he was a victim
of this SCAMSTER, Robert Morein.

> In 1991, Morein went to the head of Drexel's electrical engineering
> department, accused Kalata of appropriating his intellectual property, and
> asked for a new faculty adviser.

The staff at Drexel laughed wildly at the ignorance of Robert Morein.

> He didn't get one. Instead, a committee of four professors, including
> Kalata, was formed to oversee Morein's thesis work.
>
> Four years later, the committee dismissed him, saying he had failed to
> complete his thesis.

So Morein ****s up his first couple years, gets new faculty advisers
(a TEAM), and then ****s up again! Brilliant!

>
> Morein claimed that the committee intentionally had undermined him.

Morein makes LOTS of claims that are nonsense. One look thru the
usenet proves it.

>
> Judge Sylvester agreed. In her ruling, Sylvester wrote: "It is this court's
> opinion that the defendants were motivated by bad faith and ill will."

So much for political machine judges.
>
> The U.S. Supreme Court receives 7,000 appeals a year and agrees to hear only
> about 100 of them.
>
> Hamburg, Drexel's attorney, is betting the high court will reject Morein's
> appeal out of hand because its focal point - concerning a student's right to
> intellectual property - was not central to the litigation in the
> Pennsylvania courts.

> Morein said he understands it's a long shot, but he feels he must pursue it.

Just like all the failed "causes" Morein pursues. Heck, he's been
chasing another "Brian McCarty" for years and yet has ZERO impact on
anything.

Failure. Look it up in Websters. You'll see a picture of Robert
Morein. The poster boy for SCAMMING LOSERS.

>
> "I had to seek closure," he said.
>
> Without a doctorate, he said, he has been unable to pursue a career he had
> hoped would lead him into research on artificial intelligence.

Who better to tell us about "artificial intelligence".
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

>
> As it is, Morein lives at home with his father and makes a modest income
> from stock investments. He has written a film script that he is trying to
> make into a movie. And in the basement of his father's home he is working on
> an invention, an industrial pump so powerful it could cut steel with a
> bulletlike stream of water.


FAILED STUDENT
FAILED MOVIE MAKER
FAILED SCREENWRITER
FAILED INVESTOR
FAILED DRIVER
FAILED SON
FAILED PARENTS
FAILED INVENTOR
FAILED PLAINTIFF
FAILED HOMOSEXUAL
FAILED HUMAN
FAILED
FAILED

> But none of it is what he had imagined for himself.
>
> "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very
> gnawing thing."

[Arny Krueger]

"Bob Morein" > wrote in message
...
> I have previously identified Arny Krueger as a "bad scientist", but I
> thought he had a pretty good hold on fundamentals. Now, with his claim
that
> "thermal runaway" and "secondary breakdown", which occur in bipolar
> transistors, are separate phenomena, I realize that he is fundamentally
> ignorant as well. Apparently, Krueger manages to fake knowledgeabilty by
> abstracting papers.
>
> In this case, I am forced to quote a lengthy paragraph from The Art of
> Electronics, 2nd Edition, by Horowitz and Hill, page 159.
>
> "In the case of the bipolar power transistor, the postive (sic)
temperature
> coefficient of collector courrent (sic) at fixed V_BE (approximately
9%/degree C,
> see section 2.10) means that a local hot spot in the junction will have a
> higher current density, thus producing additional heating.

A true statement. This process happens at a variety of power levels,
generally relates to long term operation, and is addressed by design of
biasing circuits.

>At sufficiently
> high V_CE and I_C, this "current hogging" can cause local thermal
runaway",
> known as second breakdown (it). As a result, bipolar power transistors are
> limited to a "safe operating area" (on a plot of collector current versus
> collector voltage) smaller than that allowed by transistor power
dissipation
> alone (we'll see more of this in Chapter 6).

Another true statement. This process happens only at high power levels,
causes nearly instant device failure, and is addressed by protective
circuits that are indepenendent of biasing, which basically keep the
transistor from drawing enough current to destroy it, when the voltage
across the transistor is too high.

Morein might have these two different things confused in his mind, but all
the power amp designers I know of understand the difference between the two.

For one thing you can have thermal runaway at *any* power level, even in low
level circuits. Second breakdown is only an issue in high power circuits, it
involves relatively large power levels. Obviously, high power circuits can
have thermal runaway problems as well.

Thermal runaway was known about and managed for about a decade before second
breakdown started rearing its ugly head. I was an undergraduate when
secondary breakdown started seriously rearing its ugly head in audio
amplifiers. I learned to control thermal runaway in my intro electronics
courses, but I learned about second breakdown from audio engineering
magazines.

[Bob Morein]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Bob Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> > I have previously identified Arny Krueger as a "bad scientist", but I
> > thought he had a pretty good hold on fundamentals. Now, with his claim
> that
> > "thermal runaway" and "secondary breakdown", which occur in bipolar
> > transistors, are separate phenomena, I realize that he is fundamentally
> > ignorant as well. Apparently, Krueger manages to fake knowledgeabilty by
> > abstracting papers.
> >
> > In this case, I am forced to quote a lengthy paragraph from The Art of
> > Electronics, 2nd Edition, by Horowitz and Hill, page 159.
> >
> > "In the case of the bipolar power transistor, the postive (sic)
> temperature
> > coefficient of collector courrent (sic) at fixed V_BE (approximately
> 9%/degree C,
> > see section 2.10) means that a local hot spot in the junction will have
a
> > higher current density, thus producing additional heating.
>
> A true statement. This process happens at a variety of power levels,
> generally relates to long term operation, and is addressed by design of
> biasing circuits.
>
> >At sufficiently
> > high V_CE and I_C, this "current hogging" can cause local thermal
> runaway",
> > known as second breakdown (it). As a result, bipolar power transistors
are
> > limited to a "safe operating area" (on a plot of collector current
versus
> > collector voltage) smaller than that allowed by transistor power
> dissipation
> > alone (we'll see more of this in Chapter 6).
>
> Another true statement. This process happens only at high power levels,
> causes nearly instant device failure, and is addressed by protective
> circuits that are indepenendent of biasing, which basically keep the
> transistor from drawing enough current to destroy it, when the voltage
> across the transistor is too high.
>
> Morein might have these two different things confused in his mind, but all
> the power amp designers I know of understand the difference between the
two.
>
> For one thing you can have thermal runaway at *any* power level, even in
low
> level circuits. Second breakdown is only an issue in high power circuits,
it
> involves relatively large power levels. Obviously, high power circuits can
> have thermal runaway problems as well.
>
Incorrect.
Arny, you are demonstrating yourself to be a terminal dumbass ignorant son
of a bitch.
Or perhaps it's due to the twist in your character.
I knew you would never admit you were wrong, hence I'm pouring it on, just
like I did with Trotsky.
Burn yourself up. I'm going to quote this forever as evidence you are an
asshole with pretensions to be a glorified asshole.

The phenomena are two names for the same phenomena.
One pertains to the device physics. Bipolar transistors consist of multiple
junctions, each of which has a different, but positive, temperature
coefficient.
Thermal runaway is the circuit manifestation of the device physics.
Both are precisely described by the "safe area."
Is it stupidity or stubborness which keeps you from taking the hint?

I don't care, ****head.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Bob Morein" > wrote in message
...


> Both are precisely described by the "safe area."
> Is it stupidity or stubborness which keeps you from taking the hint?
>
> I don't care, ****head.
>

His pathological addiction to public abuse and self humiliation is
what drives him.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Arny Krueger]

"Bob Morein" > wrote in message
...

> Arny, you are demonstrating yourself to be a terminal dumbass ignorant son
> of a bitch.

> Or perhaps it's due to the twist in your character.

> I knew you would never admit you were wrong, hence I'm pouring it on, just
> like I did with Trotsky.

> Burn yourself up. I'm going to quote this forever as evidence you are an
> asshole with pretensions to be a glorified asshole.

> I don't care, ****head.

Professionalism is a wonderful thing, isn't it?

[Bob Morein]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Bob Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> > Arny, you are demonstrating yourself to be a terminal dumbass ignorant
son
> > of a bitch.
>
> > Or perhaps it's due to the twist in your character.
>
> > I knew you would never admit you were wrong, hence I'm pouring it on,
just
> > like I did with Trotsky.
>
> > Burn yourself up. I'm going to quote this forever as evidence you are an
> > asshole with pretensions to be a glorified asshole.
>
> > I don't care, ****head.
>
> Professionalism is a wonderful thing, isn't it?
>
Yes, it is.

[Trevor Wilson]

"Bob Morein" > wrote in message
...
> I have previously identified Arny Krueger as a "bad scientist", but I
> thought he had a pretty good hold on fundamentals. Now, with his claim
that
> "thermal runaway" and "secondary breakdown", which occur in bipolar
> transistors, are separate phenomena, I realize that he is fundamentally
> ignorant as well. Apparently, Krueger manages to fake knowledgeabilty by
> abstracting papers.

**Is this anything like the bull**** you posted earlier about MOSFET
amplifiers and 1970s vintage equipment with S/N ratios of less than 80dB?


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[Arny Krueger]

"Bob Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Bob Morein" > wrote in message
> > ...

> > > Arny, you are demonstrating yourself to be a terminal dumbass ignorant
son
> > > of a bitch.

> > > Or perhaps it's due to the twist in your character.

> > > I knew you would never admit you were wrong, hence I'm pouring it on,
just
> > > like I did with Trotsky.

This is quite ironic. A few days ago Morien tried to write a little treatise
on power amplifier design. He must have been drunk when he wrote it, because
he got virtually everything wrong. He botched an explanation of TIM, he got
dates wrong by years, he attributed accomplishments to the wrong people,
etc., etc. I posted the correct facts. Others correctly disagreed with
Morien as well.

Then, Morien showed his true lack of character with the abusive comments.
The abusive comments from Morien reproduced below are only a small sample of
the abuse he's heaped on me because I've had the temerity to try to correct
his egregious mistakes. Note that he's accepted none of the other
corrections from other people.

Bob Morein wrote:

>> Arny, you are demonstrating yourself to be a terminal dumbass ignorant
son
>> of a bitch.

>> Or perhaps it's due to the twist in your character.

>> I knew you would never admit you were wrong, hence I'm pouring it on,
just
>> like I did with Trotsky.

Morien has not proven that I was wrong, nor has he even tried to rebut the
other corrections of his egregiously-flawed claims.

> > > Burn yourself up. I'm going to quote this forever as evidence you are
an
> > > asshole with pretensions to be a glorified asshole.

> > > I don't care, ****head.

> > Professionalism is a wonderful thing, isn't it?

> Yes, it is.

Agreed. Now try to show us some, Morien. This is the sort of childish
behavior that has made you a laughing stock in some of the highest courts in
the land.

[Arny Krueger]

"Trevor Wilson" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Bob Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> > I have previously identified Arny Krueger as a "bad scientist", but I
> > thought he had a pretty good hold on fundamentals. Now, with his claim
> that
> > "thermal runaway" and "secondary breakdown", which occur in bipolar
> > transistors, are separate phenomena, I realize that he is fundamentally
> > ignorant as well. Apparently, Krueger manages to fake knowledgeabilty by
> > abstracting papers.
>
> **Is this anything like the bull**** you posted earlier about MOSFET
> amplifiers and 1970s vintage equipment with S/N ratios of less than 80dB?

Less than 80dB? As I recalled Morien claimed less than 70 dB!

Regrettably, yes. Morien abused me when I tried to correct that as well.

[Trevor Wilson]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Trevor Wilson" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Bob Morein" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > I have previously identified Arny Krueger as a "bad scientist", but I
> > > thought he had a pretty good hold on fundamentals. Now, with his claim
> > that
> > > "thermal runaway" and "secondary breakdown", which occur in bipolar
> > > transistors, are separate phenomena, I realize that he is
fundamentally
> > > ignorant as well. Apparently, Krueger manages to fake knowledgeabilty
by
> > > abstracting papers.
> >
> > **Is this anything like the bull**** you posted earlier about MOSFET
> > amplifiers and 1970s vintage equipment with S/N ratios of less than
80dB?
>
> Less than 80dB? As I recalled Morien claimed less than 70 dB!

**I was trying to be generous. I am still to receive some kind of reply on
this. Does he admit his errors?

>
> Regrettably, yes. Morien abused me when I tried to correct that as well.

**Seems like the approach of someone on the losing end of an argument


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au