Who wants to lend me a Shakti Stone?

[Robert Morein]

I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the magnetic
field in the vicinity of the stone.
This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix 7904
oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.

There must be someone, who having purchased a Shakti stone, has come to the
conclusion it is useless.
I will return the stone to the lender in the condition it was received. No
invasive procedures will be performed.

[Sander deWaal]

"Robert Morein" > said:

>Who wants to lend me a Shakti Stone?


If you promise not to duck when I throw one.

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[Arny Krueger]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message

> I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to
> modify the magnetic field in the vicinity of the stone.
> This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a
> Tektronix 7904 oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.

I'm willing to stipulate that in some sense this is true.

Now, what?

[dave weil]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:54:50 +0200, Sander deWaal >
wrote:

>"Robert Morein" > said:
>
>>Who wants to lend me a Shakti Stone?
>
>
>If you promise not to duck when I throw one.

People who live in glass bottles...

[Kalman Rubinson]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:57:55 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the magnetic
>field in the vicinity of the stone.
>This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix 7904
>oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
>
>There must be someone, who having purchased a Shakti stone, has come to the
>conclusion it is useless.
>I will return the stone to the lender in the condition it was received. No
>invasive procedures will be performed.

I would be willing to lend you one if you can pick it up in Manhattan.
My other stipulation is that you acknowledge that my only role in this
is to provide the sample.

Kal

[George Middius]

The Krooborg's battery pack is running low. Somebody send him a port-a-potty
dump, STAT!

>> I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to
>> modify the magnetic field in the vicinity of the stone.
>> This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a
>> Tektronix 7904 oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.

>I'm willing to stipulate that in some sense this is true.

Nonsensical nonsequitur noted.

>Now, what?

Same plan as before: Step in front of a speeding bus and report on the results.

[ScottW]

Robert Morein wrote:
> I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the magnetic
> field in the vicinity of the stone.
> This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix 7904
> oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.

and what will that prove?

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"Kalman Rubinson" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:57:55 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
> >I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the
magnetic
> >field in the vicinity of the stone.
> >This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix 7904
> >oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
> >
> >There must be someone, who having purchased a Shakti stone, has come to
the
> >conclusion it is useless.
> >I will return the stone to the lender in the condition it was received.
No
> >invasive procedures will be performed.
>
> I would be willing to lend you one if you can pick it up in Manhattan.
> My other stipulation is that you acknowledge that my only role in this
> is to provide the sample.
>
> Kal

Excellent! On my next foray, which will be soon.

I'll sign or acknowledge anything you feel you need.

[Robert Morein]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>
> > I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to
> > modify the magnetic field in the vicinity of the stone.
> > This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a
> > Tektronix 7904 oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
>
> I'm willing to stipulate that in some sense this is true.
>
> Now, what?
>
I don't think that a stipulation would be acceptable to the audience at
large, but if you wish to make a statement regarding your own experiments on
the Stone, it would be additive to the discussion.

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
> > I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the
magnetic
> > field in the vicinity of the stone.
> > This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix 7904
> > oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
>
> and what will that prove?
>
> ScottW
>
Whatever the results are, they will doubtless be subject to intepretation by
some and dismissal by others.

I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the Stone works.
For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or freedom to
enjoy.

[ScottW]

Robert Morein wrote:
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > Robert Morein wrote:
> > > I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the
> magnetic
> > > field in the vicinity of the stone.
> > > This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix 7904
> > > oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
> >
> > and what will that prove?
> >
> > ScottW
> >
> Whatever the results are, they will doubtless be subject to intepretation by
> some and dismissal by others.
>

A simple nothing would have sufficed.

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > oups.com...
> > >
> > > Robert Morein wrote:
> > > > I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the
> > magnetic
> > > > field in the vicinity of the stone.
> > > > This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix
7904
> > > > oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
> > >
> > > and what will that prove?
> > >
> > > ScottW
> > >
> > Whatever the results are, they will doubtless be subject to
intepretation by
> > some and dismissal by others.
> >
>
> A simple nothing would have sufficed.
>
> ScottW
>
Scott, your statement is both an incorrect interpretation, as well as a
gratuitous insult.
It surprises me that you would deliberately make a comment devoid of
constructive potential, considering your passionate defense of people who
are "special". Sanctimonious to the core, you prefer to occupy a rotating
bully pulpit. You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
your own intellectual capacity.

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the Stone works.
> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or freedom to
> enjoy.

Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of those
paperweights.

If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn what
somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime in,
I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
> your own intellectual capacity.

Bingo.

[ScottW]

Robert Morein wrote:
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> ps.com...
> >
> > Robert Morein wrote:
> > > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > > oups.com...
> > > >
> > > > Robert Morein wrote:
> > > > > I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the
> > > magnetic
> > > > > field in the vicinity of the stone.
> > > > > This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix
> 7904
> > > > > oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
> > > >
> > > > and what will that prove?
> > > >
> > > > ScottW
> > > >
> > > Whatever the results are, they will doubtless be subject to
> intepretation by
> > > some and dismissal by others.
> > >
> >
> > A simple nothing would have sufficed.
> >
> > ScottW
> >
> Scott, your statement is both an incorrect interpretation, as well as a
> gratuitous insult.

Not my fault you're stupid enough to propose a test from which no
conclusions can be drawn.


> It surprises me that you would deliberately make a comment devoid of
> constructive potential, considering your passionate defense of people who
> are "special". Sanctimonious to the core, you prefer to occupy a rotating
> bully pulpit. You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
> your own intellectual capacity.

I asked a simple question. For all your supposed intellect you
wouldn't or couldn't answer it.
Instead you're a bloviating old bag of hot air who likes to brag about
his antique o-scope. But hey... George likes you so you can't be all
bad.

Anyway... for all your pompous frothing about... I will let you try to
redeem yourself...

What will your proposed test prove?

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
> > I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the Stone
works.
> > For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or
freedom to
> > enjoy.
>
> Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of those
> paperweights.
>
> If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn what
> somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
> manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime in,
> I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.
>
Thanks for the clarification :)

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > ps.com...
> > >
> > > Robert Morein wrote:
> > > > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > > > oups.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > Robert Morein wrote:
> > > > > > I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify
the
> > > > magnetic
> > > > > > field in the vicinity of the stone.
> > > > > > This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a
Tektronix
> > 7904
> > > > > > oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
> > > > >
> > > > > and what will that prove?
> > > > >
> > > > > ScottW
> > > > >
> > > > Whatever the results are, they will doubtless be subject to
> > intepretation by
> > > > some and dismissal by others.
> > > >
> > >
> > > A simple nothing would have sufficed.
> > >
> > > ScottW
> > >
> > Scott, your statement is both an incorrect interpretation, as well as a
> > gratuitous insult.
>
> Not my fault you're stupid enough to propose a test from which no
> conclusions can be drawn.
>
>
> > It surprises me that you would deliberately make a comment devoid of
> > constructive potential, considering your passionate defense of people
who
> > are "special". Sanctimonious to the core, you prefer to occupy a
rotating
> > bully pulpit. You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly
overestimate
> > your own intellectual capacity.
>
> I asked a simple question. For all your supposed intellect you
> wouldn't or couldn't answer it.
> Instead you're a bloviating old bag of hot air who likes to brag about
> his antique o-scope. But hey... George likes you so you can't be all
> bad.
>
> Anyway... for all your pompous frothing about... I will let you try to
> redeem yourself...
>
> What will your proposed test prove?
>
> ScottW
>
Scott, you are deliberately being antagonistic. Be constructive instead.

[Goofball_star_dot_etal]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:57:55 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the magnetic
>field in the vicinity of the stone.
>This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix 7904
>oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
>
>There must be someone, who having purchased a Shakti stone, has come to the
>conclusion it is useless.
>I will return the stone to the lender in the condition it was received. No
>invasive procedures will be performed.
>
>


You want to go down in history as the man who tested the Shakti Stone?
It would be like trying to give a rock an IQ test and the stone should
have more sense than to waste time with you. I would not let you press
the tits on a duracell battery to test it, you will note.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> ps.com...
>>
>> Robert Morein wrote:
>> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
>> > oups.com...
>> > >
>> > > Robert Morein wrote:
>> > > > I'm all set up to test the ability of a Shakti stone to modify the
>> > magnetic
>> > > > field in the vicinity of the stone.
>> > > > This would be done with a Litz-wound ferrite rod, and a Tektronix
> 7904
>> > > > oscilloscope with a 7A22 plugin.
>> > >
>> > > and what will that prove?
>> > >
>> > > ScottW
>> > >
>> > Whatever the results are, they will doubtless be subject to
> intepretation by
>> > some and dismissal by others.
>> >
>>
>> A simple nothing would have sufficed.
>>
>> ScottW
>>
> Scott, your statement is both an incorrect interpretation, as well as a
> gratuitous insult.
> It surprises me that you would deliberately make a comment devoid of
> constructive potential, considering your passionate defense of people who
> are "special". Sanctimonious to the core, you prefer to occupy a rotating
> bully pulpit. You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
> your own intellectual capacity.
>
>
>
So, you have that in common then.

[[email protected]]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
>> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the Stone
>> works.
>> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or freedom
>> to
>> enjoy.
>
> Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of those
> paperweights.
>
> If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn what
> somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
> manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime in,
> I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.
>
>
>
>
Thank you for admitting you're not productive.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
wrote
> in message ...
> >
> >
> > Robert Morein said:
> >
> >> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the Stone
> >> works.
> >> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or
freedom
> >> to
> >> enjoy.
> >
> > Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of those
> > paperweights.
> >
> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn what
> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime
in,
> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Gruuunnt urrgh greeek. Thank you for gruuunnnt admitting urrrghhh you're
not productive greek.
>
Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English language,
but yours is a poverty of intellect.

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> > Gruuunnt urrgh greeek. Thank you for gruuunnnt admitting urrrghhh you're
> > not productive greek.

> Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English language,
> but yours is a poverty of intellect.

I just posted a screed that will drive Mickey wild. The torrent of
Kroogerisms Mickey will emit will break all records.

[dave weil]

On 23 Sep 2005 13:18:41 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:

>
> A simple nothing would have sufficed.

Since you've weighed in, mission accomplished.

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> What will your proposed test prove?
>>
>> ScottW
>>
> Scott, you are deliberately being antagonistic. Be constructive instead.

Sorry Bob... didn't mean to ruin your game of mad scientist.
Carry on.
If you ever figure out the answer to my question... let us know.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On 23 Sep 2005 13:18:41 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>>
>> A simple nothing would have sufficed.
>
> Since you've weighed in, mission accomplished.

Why are you butting into my scientific discussion with Bob?

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:qV2Ze.121092$Ep.93923@lakeread02...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>
> >> What will your proposed test prove?
> >>
> >> ScottW
> >>
> > Scott, you are deliberately being antagonistic. Be constructive instead.
>
> Sorry Bob... didn't mean to ruin your game of mad scientist.
> Carry on.

Scott, add something. Be constructive.

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:wW2Ze.121093$Ep.87030@lakeread02...
>
> "dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On 23 Sep 2005 13:18:41 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> A simple nothing would have sufficed.
> >
> > Since you've weighed in, mission accomplished.
>
> Why are you butting into my scientific discussion with Bob?
>
> ScottW
>
You're not having one. Be constructive.

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
>> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the Stone
>> works.
>> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or freedom
>> to
>> enjoy.
>
> Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of those
> paperweights.
>
> If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn what
> somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
> manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime in,
> I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.

Nice admission George... but I already knew you were too stupid to
do anything productive.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> Scott, add something. Be constructive.

Scottie is a recovering Kroopologist. It's all he can do to keep his head
from spinning round and round.

[George M. Middius]

Yapper barked:

> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn what
> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime in,
> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.

> Nice admission George... but I already knew you were too stupid to
> do anything productive.

Nerd humor is an ugly business.

[Clyde Slick]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>

> Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English language,
> but yours is a poverty of intellect.
>

Born from the intellect of poverty

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:qV2Ze.121092$Ep.93923@lakeread02...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>
>> >> What will your proposed test prove?
>> >>
>> >> ScottW
>> >>
>> > Scott, you are deliberately being antagonistic. Be constructive
>> > instead.
>>
>> Sorry Bob... didn't mean to ruin your game of mad scientist.
>> Carry on.
>
> Scott, add something. Be constructive.

If you figure out what good it will do... I'll check 'em with a gauss meter
for you.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Yapper barked:
>
>> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn what
>> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
>> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime
>> > in,
>> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.
>
>> Nice admission George... but I already knew you were too stupid to
>> do anything productive.
>
> Nerd humor is an ugly business.

Who's joking?

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:nk3Ze.121096$Ep.113727@lakeread02...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > news:qV2Ze.121092$Ep.93923@lakeread02...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >>
> >> >> What will your proposed test prove?
> >> >>
> >> >> ScottW
> >> >>
> >> > Scott, you are deliberately being antagonistic. Be constructive
> >> > instead.
> >>
> >> Sorry Bob... didn't mean to ruin your game of mad scientist.
> >> Carry on.
> >
> > Scott, add something. Be constructive.
>
> If you figure out what good it will do... I'll check 'em with a gauss
meter
> for you.
>
> ScottW
>
Scott, the only Stone available to me is a loan from Kal. I cannot transfer
it to anyone; I must return it directly to him. However, I encourage you to
investigate the Stone in whatever ways you wish. A simple gaussmeter is not
likely to be revealing. An audio component is surrounded by a complex hash
of EMF, which the meter cannot analyze.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote
>> in message ...
>> >
>> >
>> > Robert Morein said:
>> >
>> >> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the Stone
>> >> works.
>> >> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or
> freedom
>> >> to
>> >> enjoy.
>> >
>> > Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of those
>> > paperweights.
>> >
>> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn what
>> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
>> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime
> in,
>> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> Gruuunnt urrgh greeek. Thank you for gruuunnnt admitting urrrghhh you're
> not productive greek.
>>
> Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English language,
> but yours is a poverty of intellect.
>
And yours are pompous and self serving, even on the rare occasion when you
get the science right.

[[email protected]]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:WX2Ze.121094$Ep.86671@lakeread02...
>
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote in message ...
>>
>>
>> Robert Morein said:
>>
>>> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the Stone
>>> works.
>>> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or
>>> freedom to
>>> enjoy.
>>
>> Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of those
>> paperweights.
>>
>> If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn what
>> somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
>> manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime in,
>> I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.
>
> Nice admission George... but I already knew you were too stupid to
> do anything productive.
>

You mean cleaning toilets with his tongue at NAMBLA HQ isn't prodcuctive?

[Lionel]

George Minus Middius wrote :
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
>
>>You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
>>your own intellectual capacity.
>
>
> Bingo.

After so much years stalking him, you sound like Arnold
Krueger now. ;-)

[Lionel]

Robert Morein a écrit :

> Scott... You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
> your own intellectual capacity.

Famous analyze, Bob. Congratulations.
Let say that Scott has the indestructible pride of the
imbeciles and that he uses of it without any moderation. ;-)

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >>
> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> > wrote
> >> in message ...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Robert Morein said:
> >> >
> >> >> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the
Stone
> >> >> works.
> >> >> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or
> > freedom
> >> >> to
> >> >> enjoy.
> >> >
> >> > Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of those
> >> > paperweights.
> >> >
> >> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn
what
> >> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
> >> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to chime
> > in,
> >> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Gruuunnt urrgh greeek. Thank you for gruuunnnt admitting urrrghhh
you're
> > not productive greek.
> >>
> > Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English
language,
> > but yours is a poverty of intellect.
> >
> And gruuuunttt yours are urrrrghhh pompous and grreeekkk self serving,
even on the rare gruuunt occasion when urrrghhh you
> get greeeek the gruuuunt science urrrrghhh right.
>
Mikey, you attempted to plagiarize me, but you made a serious grammatical
error. I've covered it up for you with your natural vocalizations. Get your
clasper ready. If you're lucky, you'll attract a mate.

[dave weil]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:33:56 -0700, "ScottW" >
wrote:

>
>"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>> On 23 Sep 2005 13:18:41 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A simple nothing would have sufficed.
>>
>> Since you've weighed in, mission accomplished.
>
> Why are you butting into my scientific discussion with Bob?

What "scientific discussion"?

Now you see how annoying it is to be "butted in".

Turnabout is fair play, you moron.

[dave weil]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 22:34:40 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>
>"ScottW" > wrote in message
>news:qV2Ze.121092$Ep.93923@lakeread02...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>
>> >> What will your proposed test prove?
>> >>
>> >> ScottW
>> >>
>> > Scott, you are deliberately being antagonistic. Be constructive instead.
>>
>> Sorry Bob... didn't mean to ruin your game of mad scientist.
>> Carry on.
>
>Scott, add something. Be constructive.

Impossible.

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Robert Morein a écrit :
>
>> Scott... You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
>> your own intellectual capacity.
>
> Famous analyze, Bob. Congratulations.
> Let say that Scott has the indestructible pride of the imbeciles and that
> he uses of it without any moderation. ;-)

When you get tired of inspecting sewers,
you can have a bright future writing fortune cookies

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Robert Morein a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>Scott... You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
>>>your own intellectual capacity.
>>
>>Famous analyze, Bob. Congratulations.
>>Let say that Scott has the indestructible pride of the imbeciles and that
>>he uses of it without any moderation. ;-)
>
>
> When you get tired of inspecting sewers,
> you can have a bright future writing fortune cookies

When you will have finish your gestation in Middius' colon
everybody will see what a little stinky turd you are ! ;-)

[paul packer]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:36:20 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
>your own intellectual capacity.

Eh hang on, there's something familiar here...

[Robert Morein]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:36:20 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
> >You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
> >your own intellectual capacity.
>
> Eh hang on, there's something familiar here...

Hey, if it works...

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> When you get tired of inspecting sewers,
>> you can have a bright future writing fortune cookies
>
> When you will have finish your gestation in Middius' colon everybody will
> see what a little stinky turd you are ! ;-)

Its just a little bit too long to fit on the slip of paper.

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> > Middius

> Its just a little bit too long to fit on the slip of paper.

Can you figure out why Sluttie is so jealous of me? I've never met you,
not even talked on the phone. If La Salope wants to be your friend, I have
no objection of any sort.

[Lionel]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>
>>>Middius
>
>
>>Its just a little bit too long to fit on the slip of paper.
>
>
> Can you figure out why Sluttie is so jealous of me?

LOL !

> I've never met you,
> not even talked on the phone.

This is my point.

> If La Salope wants to be your friend, I have
> no objection of any sort.

Beurk...

[Clyde Slick]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>> > Middius
>
>> Its just a little bit too long to fit on the slip of paper.
>
> Can you figure out why Sluttie is so jealous of me? I've never met you,
> not even talked on the phone. If La Salope wants to be your friend, I have
> no objection of any sort.
>


He is welcome to meet me at Terminal 2B at CDG on
Saturday morning between 7:15 and 9AM, Oct 15.
All I ask is that he bring me a gift of a sealed bottle
of water (no sewer water, please!)

[ScottW]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:33:56 -0700, "ScottW" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>>> On 23 Sep 2005 13:18:41 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> A simple nothing would have sufficed.
>>>
>>> Since you've weighed in, mission accomplished.
>>
>> Why are you butting into my scientific discussion with Bob?
>
> What "scientific discussion"?
>
> Now you see how annoying it is to be "butted in".
>
> Turnabout is fair play, you moron.

Only for those lacking enough spine to hold to their moral standards.
Dave's Golden rule..Do unto others as they do unto you.

Could you make your pathetic lack of moral fiber any more obvious?

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:wUhZe.121297$Ep.20844@lakeread02...
>
> "dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:33:56 -0700, "ScottW" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>> On 23 Sep 2005 13:18:41 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> A simple nothing would have sufficed.
> >>>
> >>> Since you've weighed in, mission accomplished.
> >>
> >> Why are you butting into my scientific discussion with Bob?
> >
> > What "scientific discussion"?
> >
> > Now you see how annoying it is to be "butted in".
> >
> > Turnabout is fair play, you moron.
>
> Only for those lacking enough spine to hold to their moral standards.
> Dave's Golden rule..Do unto others as they do unto you.
>
> Could you make your pathetic lack of moral fiber any more obvious?
>
> ScottW
>
Continuing the "scientific" discussion, could you make your pathetic lack of
dietary fiber any more obvious?

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:wUhZe.121297$Ep.20844@lakeread02...
>>
>> "dave weil" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:33:56 -0700, "ScottW" >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>"dave weil" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>> On 23 Sep 2005 13:18:41 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A simple nothing would have sufficed.
>> >>>
>> >>> Since you've weighed in, mission accomplished.
>> >>
>> >> Why are you butting into my scientific discussion with Bob?
>> >
>> > What "scientific discussion"?
>> >
>> > Now you see how annoying it is to be "butted in".
>> >
>> > Turnabout is fair play, you moron.
>>
>> Only for those lacking enough spine to hold to their moral standards.
>> Dave's Golden rule..Do unto others as they do unto you.
>>
>> Could you make your pathetic lack of moral fiber any more obvious?
>>
>> ScottW
>>
> Continuing the "scientific" discussion, could you make your pathetic lack
> of
> dietary fiber any more obvious?

Bob, You remind me of Data trying to do humor.
Anyway I know that Mikey made you into a complete ass.
What I can't figure out is... why you helped him do it?

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

I guess I was wrong. Scooter really doesn't know any better.

> Anyway I know that Mikey made you into a complete ass.

You and Mickey are united in your love of George W. Bush, the worst
president this country has ever had. And that includes Andrew Johnson,
Herbert Hoover, and Richard Nixon.

Say "nucular" for us, Yapper.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > ink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>> > wrote
>> >> in message ...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Robert Morein said:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the
> Stone
>> >> >> works.
>> >> >> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or
>> > freedom
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> enjoy.
>> >> >
>> >> > Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of those
>> >> > paperweights.
>> >> >
>> >> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn
> what
>> >> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
>> >> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to
>> >> > chime
>> > in,
>> >> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something productive.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Gruuunnt urrgh greeek. Thank you for gruuunnnt admitting urrrghhh
> you're
>> > not productive greek.
>> >>
>> > Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English
> language,
>> > but yours is a poverty of intellect.
>> >
>> And gruuuunttt yours are urrrrghhh pompous and grreeekkk self serving,
> even on the rare gruuunt occasion when urrrghhh you
>> get greeeek the gruuuunt science urrrrghhh right.
>>
> Mikey, you attempted to plagiarize me, but you made a serious grammatical
> error. I've covered it up for you with your natural vocalizations. Get
> your
> clasper ready. If you're lucky, you'll attract a mate.
>
The only clasping anything here Bob, is you.
You are the resident grammatical tight ass.

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:LqlZe.121370$Ep.15646@lakeread02...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
[snip]
> >>
> > Continuing the "scientific" discussion, could you make your pathetic
lack
> > of
> > dietary fiber any more obvious?
>
> Bob, You remind me of Data trying to do humor.
> Anyway I know that Mikey made you into a complete ass.
> What I can't figure out is... why you helped him do it?
>
> ScottW
>
Scott, the "..." is the ellipsis, which is a symbol for elided text.
What text did you choose to elide in the above? Please repost the entire
text.

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> I guess I was wrong. Scooter really doesn't know any better.
>
>> Anyway I know that Mikey made you into a complete ass.
>
> You and Mickey are united in your love of George W. Bush,

George pulls the usenet equivalent of bending over and
baring his ass as he spouts more ****... again.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:LqlZe.121370$Ep.15646@lakeread02...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
> [snip]
>> >>
>> > Continuing the "scientific" discussion, could you make your pathetic
> lack
>> > of
>> > dietary fiber any more obvious?
>>
>> Bob, You remind me of Data trying to do humor.
>> Anyway I know that Mikey made you into a complete ass.
>> What I can't figure out is... why you helped him do it?
>>
>> ScottW
>>
> Scott, the "..." is the ellipsis, which is a symbol for elided text.
> What text did you choose to elide in the above? Please repost the entire
> text.

Sorry Bob... its just a pause. Nothing more than a chance for you ....to
keep up.

So ... why did you help Mikey...make you.... into a complete ass?

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:OumZe.121375$Ep.43151@lakeread02...
>
[snip]
>
> So ... why did you help Mikey...make you.... into a complete ass?
>
> ScottW
>
Scott, you must learn proper grammar and punctuation. The quality of your
mind appear inferior.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > ink.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot]
net>
> >> > wrote
> >> >> in message ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Robert Morein said:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the
> > Stone
> >> >> >> works.
> >> >> >> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice, or
> >> > freedom
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> enjoy.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of
those
> >> >> > paperweights.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn
> > what
> >> >> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
> >> >> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to
> >> >> > chime
> >> > in,
> >> >> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something
productive.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> Gruuunnt urrgh greeek. Thank you for gruuunnnt admitting urrrghhh
> > you're
> >> > not productive greek.
> >> >>
> >> > Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English
> > language,
> >> > but yours is a poverty of intellect.
> >> >
> >> And gruuuunttt yours are urrrrghhh pompous and grreeekkk self serving,
> > even on the rare gruuunt occasion when urrrghhh you
> >> get greeeek the gruuuunt science urrrrghhh right.
> >>
> > Mikey, you attempted to plagiarize me, but you made a serious
grammatical
> > error. I've covered it up for you with your natural vocalizations. Get
> > your
> > clasper ready. If you're lucky, you'll attract a mate.
> >
> The only gruuunntclasping urrrrghh anything here greeeek Bob, is gruuunt
you urrrghht greeeek.
> You grrunnnt are the urrgh resident greeeek grammatical gruuuunt tight
ass .
>
When attempting to mate, the mckelviphibian inflates the brightly colored
crest, located on the dorsal surface, while simultaneously expelling rank
air from a bladder to form characteristic vocalizations.

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:OumZe.121375$Ep.43151@lakeread02...
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> So ... why did you help Mikey...make you.... into a complete ass?
>>
>> ScottW
>>
> Scott, you must learn proper grammar and punctuation. The quality of your
> mind appear inferior.

Read your words carefully Bob... then cry yourself to sleep.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>>
> When attempting to mate, the mckelviphibian inflates the brightly colored
> crest, located on the dorsal surface, while simultaneously expelling rank
> air from a bladder to form characteristic vocalizations.
>
>

Poor Bob, for all his pompousness he can't see his glass house is in shards
and his feet are bare.

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:5rnZe.121376$Ep.84813@lakeread02...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > news:OumZe.121375$Ep.43151@lakeread02...
> >>
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> So ... why did you help Mikey...make you.... into a complete ass?
> >>
> >> ScottW
> >>
> > Scott, you must learn proper grammar and punctuation. The quality of
your
> > mind appear inferior.
>
> Read your words carefully Bob... then cry yourself to sleep.
>
> ScottW
>
Permit me to repeat the statement: The quality of your mind appears
inferior.

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:axnZe.121377$Ep.77934@lakeread02...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>
> > When attempting to mate, the mckelviphibian inflates the brightly
colored
> > crest, located on the dorsal surface, while simultaneously expelling
rank
> > air from a bladder to form characteristic vocalizations.
> >
> >
>
> Poor Bob, for all his pompousness he can't see his glass house is in
shards
> and his feet are bare.
>
Scott, choose your friends carefully. I get the impression that you are some
kind of an engineer, or at least, a skilled technician. Mikey is a very dumb
guy. If you want to run with the mentally retarded, I cannot stop you. But
you will find the relationship unrewarding.

[paul packer]

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 11:47:36 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>
>"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:36:20 -0400, "Robert Morein"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
>> >your own intellectual capacity.
>>
>> Eh hang on, there's something familiar here...
>
>Hey, if it works...

You have evidence?

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:axnZe.121377$Ep.77934@lakeread02...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>
>> > When attempting to mate, the mckelviphibian inflates the brightly
> colored
>> > crest, located on the dorsal surface, while simultaneously expelling
> rank
>> > air from a bladder to form characteristic vocalizations.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Poor Bob, for all his pompousness he can't see his glass house is in
> shards
>> and his feet are bare.
>>
> Scott, choose your friends carefully.

Silly Bob, I don't have to be friends with someone to call BS when I
see it.

> I get the impression that you are some
> kind of an engineer, or at least, a skilled technician. Mikey is a very
> dumb
> guy.

We all have our faults. You, for example, are an arrogant pompous
twit with delusions of intellectual grandeur. But I didn't even hold
that against you. Not until you turned into a usenet fascist anyway.

> If you want to run with the mentally retarded, I cannot stop you. But
> you will find the relationship unrewarding.

Poor Bob, it isn't Mikey I'm saving.... it's you.

ScottW

ScottW

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:5rnZe.121376$Ep.84813@lakeread02...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
>> > news:OumZe.121375$Ep.43151@lakeread02...
>> >>
>> > [snip]
>> >>
>> >> So ... why did you help Mikey...make you.... into a complete ass?
>> >>
>> >> ScottW
>> >>
>> > Scott, you must learn proper grammar and punctuation. The quality of
> your
>> > mind appear inferior.
>>
>> Read your words carefully Bob... then cry yourself to sleep.
>>
>> ScottW
>>
> Permit me to repeat the statement: The quality of your mind appears
> inferior.

Too late Bob. By your own words you've already demonstrated yourself
to be in apparent possession of an inferior mind. I'll let you ponder, to
what.

ScottW

[Clyde Slick]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:OumZe.121375$Ep.43151@lakeread02...
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> So ... why did you help Mikey...make you.... into a complete ass?
>>
>> ScottW
>>
> Scott, you must learn proper grammar and punctuation. The quality of your
> mind appear inferior.
>
>

Bob, I'll put it mildly,
you are not appearing in your best light here.....whatever that is.

[Robert Morein]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 11:47:36 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:36:20 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
> >> >your own intellectual capacity.
> >>
> >> Eh hang on, there's something familiar here...
> >
> >Hey, if it works...
>
> You have evidence?

Now you're pushing me.
Posturing is essential in this barnyard.

[Robert Morein]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > news:OumZe.121375$Ep.43151@lakeread02...
> >>
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> So ... why did you help Mikey...make you.... into a complete ass?
> >>
> >> ScottW
> >>
> > Scott, you must learn proper grammar and punctuation. The quality of
your
> > mind appear inferior.
> >
> >
>
> Bob, I'll put it mildly,
> you are not appearing in your best light here.....whatever that is.
>
Clyde, you're right. It's a bit like a slugfest with the Three Stooges. Hit
them over the head with a frying pan, and you hear a clanging sound. Perhaps
this script has exhausted its potential.

Rec.audio.opinion is plagued by posters with so little to say, and a strong
desire to say it.

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:Z5oZe.121379$Ep.8830@lakeread02...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > news:axnZe.121377$Ep.77934@lakeread02...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >>
> >> > When attempting to mate, the mckelviphibian inflates the brightly
> > colored
> >> > crest, located on the dorsal surface, while simultaneously expelling
> > rank
> >> > air from a bladder to form characteristic vocalizations.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Poor Bob, for all his pompousness he can't see his glass house is in
> > shards
> >> and his feet are bare.
> >>
> > Scott, choose your friends carefully.
>
> Silly Bob, I don't have to be friends with someone to call BS when I
> see it.
>
> > I get the impression that you are some
> > kind of an engineer, or at least, a skilled technician. Mikey is a very
> > dumb
> > guy.
>
> We all have our faults. You, for example, are an arrogant pompous
> twit with delusions of intellectual grandeur. But I didn't even hold
> that against you. Not until you turned into a usenet fascist anyway.
>
Scott, I suggest you adopt Mikey and make him your own "project."
Do a good deed. Try to help Mikey reach his full potential.
Maybe you can teach him to wear clothes and play ping pong.

[dave weil]

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 12:35:51 -0700, "ScottW" >
wrote:

>>> Why are you butting into my scientific discussion with Bob?
>>
>> What "scientific discussion"?
>>
>> Now you see how annoying it is to be "butted in".
>>
>> Turnabout is fair play, you moron.
>
> Only for those lacking enough spine to hold to their moral standards.
> Dave's Golden rule..Do unto others as they do unto you.
>
> Could you make your pathetic lack of moral fiber any more obvious?

Said the guy who doesn't mind butting in...

Don't forget to check your fiber at the door.

[dave weil]

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 21:38:04 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:

>
>"ScottW" > wrote in message
>news:OumZe.121375$Ep.43151@lakeread02...
>>
>[snip]
>>
>> So ... why did you help Mikey...make you.... into a complete ass?
>>
>> ScottW
>>
>Scott, you must learn proper grammar and punctuation. The quality of your
>mind appear inferior.

And the irony fairy pops in again...

[Sander deWaal]

"Robert Morein" > said:

>Scott, the "..." is the ellipsis, which is a symbol for elided text.


I've seen that mostly printed as [.......] .

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[George M. Middius]

Sander deWaal said:

> >Scott, the "..." is the ellipsis, which is a symbol for elided text.

> I've seen that mostly printed as [.......] .

Isn't that because Pinkerton's reflexes are slowed? ;-)

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 11:47:36 -0400, "Robert Morein"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"paul packer" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:36:20 -0400, "Robert Morein"
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
>> >> >your own intellectual capacity.
>> >>
>> >> Eh hang on, there's something familiar here...
>> >
>> >Hey, if it works...
>>
>> You have evidence?
>
> Now you're pushing me.
> Posturing is essential in this barnyard.

Only for those who depend on pompous arrogance to
cover their ignorance. Posture away George.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 12:35:51 -0700, "ScottW" >
> wrote:
>
>>>> Why are you butting into my scientific discussion with Bob?
>>>
>>> What "scientific discussion"?
>>>
>>> Now you see how annoying it is to be "butted in".
>>>
>>> Turnabout is fair play, you moron.
>>
>> Only for those lacking enough spine to hold to their moral standards.
>> Dave's Golden rule..Do unto others as they do unto you.
>>
>> Could you make your pathetic lack of moral fiber any more obvious?
>
> Said the guy who doesn't mind butting in...
>
> Don't forget to check your fiber at the door.

Dave, Try to stop your moral base from spinning as you flounder for RAO
points. It will really help you from continuously stumbling into hypocrisy.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Yapper barked:

> > Posturing is essential in this barnyard.

> Posture away George.

Why thank you, Mickey.

[Clyde Slick]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Sander deWaal said:
>
>> >Scott, the "..." is the ellipsis, which is a symbol for elided text.
>
>> I've seen that mostly printed as [.......] .
>
> Isn't that because Pinkerton's reflexes are slowed? ;-)
>
>

For Pinky its [~^~^^~~^~^~~]

[surf]

"ScottW" > wrote

>Morein wrote:
>> Posturing is essential in this barnyard.
>
> Only for those who depend on pompous arrogance to
> cover their ignorance. Posture away George.


That sounds like everyone here (except me of course)
If we weren't ignorant, we'd be somewhere else.

[surf]

"ScottW" > wrote
>
> Only for those lacking enough spine to hold to their moral standards.

That sounds like everyone here (except..........)
If we had moral standards, we'd be somewhere else.

[Ruud Broens]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
:
: "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
: in message ...
: >
: >
: > Sander deWaal said:
: >
: >> >Scott, the "..." is the ellipsis, which is a symbol for elided text.
: >
: >> I've seen that mostly printed as [.......] .
: >
: > Isn't that because Pinkerton's reflexes are slowed? ;-)
: >
: >
:
: For Pinky its [~^~^^~~^~^~~]
:
...seven dots, the 7 :: infinity, the circle,
with Stewart it may stand for -many circular reasoning statements
of 'fact' conveniently left out-
:-)
Rudy

[Clyde Slick]

"Ruud Broens" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
> :
> : "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote
> : in message ...
> : >
> : >
> : > Sander deWaal said:
> : >
> : >> >Scott, the "..." is the ellipsis, which is a symbol for elided text.
> : >
> : >> I've seen that mostly printed as [.......] .
> : >
> : > Isn't that because Pinkerton's reflexes are slowed? ;-)
> : >
> : >
> :
> : For Pinky its [~^~^^~~^~^~~]
> :
> ..seven dots, the 7 :: infinity, the circle,
> with Stewart it may stand for -many circular reasoning statements
> of 'fact' conveniently left out-
> :-)
> Rudy
>

Stuart's too ****ed to walk in a 'straight' arc.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 08:20:14 -0700, "ScottW" >
wrote:


>> Don't forget to check your fiber at the door.
>
> Dave, Try to stop your moral base from spinning as you flounder for RAO
>points. It will really help you from continuously stumbling into hypocrisy.
>
>ScottW

You boys! Honestly! :-)

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > ink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > ink.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot]
> net>
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> in message ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Robert Morein said:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the
>> > Stone
>> >> >> >> works.
>> >> >> >> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice,
>> >> >> >> or
>> >> > freedom
>> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> enjoy.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of
> those
>> >> >> > paperweights.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a damn
>> > what
>> >> >> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough to
>> >> >> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to
>> >> >> > chime
>> >> > in,
>> >> >> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something
> productive.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Gruuunnt urrgh greeek. Thank you for gruuunnnt admitting urrrghhh
>> > you're
>> >> > not productive greek.
>> >> >>
>> >> > Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English
>> > language,
>> >> > but yours is a poverty of intellect.
>> >> >
>> >> And gruuuunttt yours are urrrrghhh pompous and grreeekkk self serving,
>> > even on the rare gruuunt occasion when urrrghhh you
>> >> get greeeek the gruuuunt science urrrrghhh right.
>> >>
>> > Mikey, you attempted to plagiarize me, but you made a serious
> grammatical
>> > error. I've covered it up for you with your natural vocalizations. Get
>> > your
>> > clasper ready. If you're lucky, you'll attract a mate.
>> >
>> The only gruuunntclasping urrrrghh anything here greeeek Bob, is gruuunt
> you urrrghht greeeek.
>> You grrunnnt are the urrgh resident greeeek grammatical gruuuunt tight
> ass .
>>
> When attempting to mate, the mckelviphibian inflates the brightly colored
> crest, located on the dorsal surface, while simultaneously expelling rank
> air from a bladder to form characteristic vocalizations.
>
I don't get it Bob.

Do you think you can compensate for being impotent in every other aspect of
your life, if you prove you can correct my typos?

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 11:47:36 -0400, "Robert Morein"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"paul packer" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:36:20 -0400, "Robert Morein"
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >You are a very ordinary person, and you vastly overestimate
>> >> >your own intellectual capacity.
>> >>
>> >> Eh hang on, there's something familiar here...
>> >
>> >Hey, if it works...
>>
>> You have evidence?
>
> Now you're pushing me.
> Posturing is essential in this barnyard.
>
Thank you for admitting you are posturing.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
nk.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> " > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> >
>>> > " > wrote in message
>>> > ink.net...
>>> >>
>>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>>> >> ...
>>> >> >
>>> >> > " > wrote in message
>>> >> > ink.net...
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot]
>> net>
>>> >> > wrote
>>> >> >> in message ...
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Robert Morein said:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe the
>>> > Stone
>>> >> >> >> works.
>>> >> >> >> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice,
>>> >> >> >> or
>>> >> > freedom
>>> >> >> >> to
>>> >> >> >> enjoy.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of
>> those
>>> >> >> > paperweights.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a
>>> >> >> > damn
>>> > what
>>> >> >> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough
>>> >> >> > to
>>> >> >> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to
>>> >> >> > chime
>>> >> > in,
>>> >> >> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something
>> productive.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> Gruuunnt urrgh greeek. Thank you for gruuunnnt admitting urrrghhh
>>> > you're
>>> >> > not productive greek.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> > Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English
>>> > language,
>>> >> > but yours is a poverty of intellect.
>>> >> >
>>> >> And gruuuunttt yours are urrrrghhh pompous and grreeekkk self
>>> >> serving,
>>> > even on the rare gruuunt occasion when urrrghhh you
>>> >> get greeeek the gruuuunt science urrrrghhh right.
>>> >>
>>> > Mikey, you attempted to plagiarize me, but you made a serious
>> grammatical
>>> > error. I've covered it up for you with your natural vocalizations. Get
>>> > your
>>> > clasper ready. If you're lucky, you'll attract a mate.
>>> >
>>> The only gruuunntclasping urrrrghh anything here greeeek Bob, is
>>> gruuunt
>> you urrrghht greeeek.
>>> You grrunnnt are the urrgh resident greeeek grammatical gruuuunt tight
>> ass .
>>>
>> When attempting to mate, the mckelviphibian inflates the brightly colored
>> crest, located on the dorsal surface, while simultaneously expelling rank
>> air from a bladder to form characteristic vocalizations.
>>
> I don't get it Bob.
>
> Do you think you can compensate for being impotent in every other aspect
> of your life, if you prove you can correct my typos?
It is impossible for your tiny mind to comprehend the wisdom of the Krell.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> nk.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> " > wrote in message
>>> ink.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>> >
>>>> > " > wrote in message
>>>> > ink.net...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>>>> >> ...
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > " > wrote in message
>>>> >> > ink.net...
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot]
>>> net>
>>>> >> > wrote
>>>> >> >> in message ...
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Robert Morein said:
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >> I wonder if any of the r.a.o. participants actually believe
>>>> >> >> >> the
>>>> > Stone
>>>> >> >> >> works.
>>>> >> >> >> For some, such as Middius, the issue may be freedom of choice,
>>>> >> >> >> or
>>>> >> > freedom
>>>> >> >> >> to
>>>> >> >> >> enjoy.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Why are you bringing me into this? I've never even seen one of
>>> those
>>>> >> >> > paperweights.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > If you're hinting at the class warfare thing, I don't give a
>>>> >> >> > damn
>>>> > what
>>>> >> >> > somebody sells and somebody else buys. If I were clever enough
>>>> >> >> > to
>>>> >> >> > manufacture a gimmick like the Shakti and get some reviewers to
>>>> >> >> > chime
>>>> >> > in,
>>>> >> >> > I'd also be clever enough to make money doing something
>>> productive.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> Gruuunnt urrgh greeek. Thank you for gruuunnnt admitting
>>>> >> >> urrrghhh
>>>> > you're
>>>> >> > not productive greek.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> > Mikey, there are so many phrases one can devise with the English
>>>> > language,
>>>> >> > but yours is a poverty of intellect.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> And gruuuunttt yours are urrrrghhh pompous and grreeekkk self
>>>> >> serving,
>>>> > even on the rare gruuunt occasion when urrrghhh you
>>>> >> get greeeek the gruuuunt science urrrrghhh right.
>>>> >>
>>>> > Mikey, you attempted to plagiarize me, but you made a serious
>>> grammatical
>>>> > error. I've covered it up for you with your natural vocalizations.
>>>> > Get
>>>> > your
>>>> > clasper ready. If you're lucky, you'll attract a mate.
>>>> >
>>>> The only gruuunntclasping urrrrghh anything here greeeek Bob, is
>>>> gruuunt
>>> you urrrghht greeeek.
>>>> You grrunnnt are the urrgh resident greeeek grammatical gruuuunt tight
>>> ass .
>>>>
>>> When attempting to mate, the mckelviphibian inflates the brightly
>>> colored
>>> crest, located on the dorsal surface, while simultaneously expelling
>>> rank
>>> air from a bladder to form characteristic vocalizations.
>>>
>> I don't get it Bob.
>>
>> Do you think you can compensate for being impotent in every other aspect
>> of your life, if you prove you can correct my typos?

> It is impossible for your tiny mind to comprehend the wisdom of the Krell.
Is it impossible for you to understand that Krell is like many other
manufacturers, making great gear. Krell simply overbuilds to ridiculous
extremes. It doesn't make their gear sound different, it just tends to last
longer.

Did it slip your mind that one of the amplifiers I own is an Acoustat 120?
Can you get your head around the fact that it could't be differentiated from
a Pioneer reciever?

Your own adherence to Auido mythology is shameful, given the fact that you
should know better.

[surf]

Mikey wrote:
>
> Did it slip your mind that one of the amplifiers I own is an Acoustat 120?
> Can you get your head around the fact that it could't be differentiated
> from a Pioneer reciever?
>
> Your own adherence to Auido mythology is shameful, given the fact that you
> should know better.


You kids are ridiculous. Does the phrase, "lose, lose" mean anything to
you?

Mikey - you've already admitted that other possibilities exist. The fact
that you keep a closed mind is shameful.

[[email protected]]

"surf" > wrote in message
...
> Mikey wrote:
>>
>> Did it slip your mind that one of the amplifiers I own is an Acoustat
>> 120?
>> Can you get your head around the fact that it could't be differentiated
>> from a Pioneer reciever?
>>
>> Your own adherence to Auido mythology is shameful, given the fact that
>> you should know better.
>
>
> You kids are ridiculous. Does the phrase, "lose, lose" mean anything to
> you?
>
> Mikey - you've already admitted that other possibilities exist. The fact
> that you keep a closed mind is shameful.
My mind is not closed. If you or anyone else has some evidence to present,
do so.
Don't forget, I used to be a Liberal, so anything is possible. :-)

[///////////////@////////////.com]

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:24:48 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> wrote:



>It is impossible for your tiny mind to comprehend the wisdom of the Krell.
>

A Krell amp is boring amp.
To listen to them for more than an hour.
gives me a headache .
But they are big with nice front panels.
important for men with a small penis

[Clyde Slick]

> wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:24:48 -0400, "Robert Morein"
> > wrote:
>
>
>
>>It is impossible for your tiny mind to comprehend the wisdom of the Krell.
>>
>
> A Krell amp is boring amp.
> To listen to them for more than an hour.
> gives me a headache .
> But they are big with nice front panels.
> important for men with a small penis

Nice, now tell us what you REALLY think
about Bose.