Re: Welcome Howard Ferstler

[Bob Morein]

"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
m...
> Hello, goofballs:
>
> Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
> which will include a second large AV room and system),

It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how temporary.
Before you resume your important affairs, would you be so kind as to take a
look at the following website: http://www.jupiter-audio.com , and render an
apriori estimate as to the probable worth of this product?

Thank you for your time.

[dave weil]

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:27:19 -0400, "Bob Morein" >
wrote:

>
>"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
m...
>> Hello, goofballs:
>>
>> Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
>> which will include a second large AV room and system),
>
>It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how temporary.
>Before you resume your important affairs, would you be so kind as to take a
>look at the following website: http://www.jupiter-audio.com , and render an
>apriori estimate as to the probable worth of this product?
>
>Thank you for your time.

You know Bob, you've really got too much time on your hands.

I now think that you deserve the attention that Mr. McCarty gives you.

[George M. Middius]

Bobo goes off his already-teetery rails.

> > Just dropped in

> It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how temporary.

Did you also relish your last outbreak of boils?

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:27:19 -0400, "Bob Morein" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
> m...
> >> Hello, goofballs:
> >>
> >> Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
> >> which will include a second large AV room and system),
> >
> >It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how temporary.
> >Before you resume your important affairs, would you be so kind as to take
a
> >look at the following website: http://www.jupiter-audio.com , and render
an
> >apriori estimate as to the probable worth of this product?
> >
> >Thank you for your time.
>
> You know Bob, you've really got too much time on your hands.
>
> I now think that you deserve the attention that Mr. McCarty gives you.

McCarthy is looking better all the time.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>

>
> Did you also relish your last outbreak of boils?
>
>

Maybe he used relish with his mustard plaster.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[tor b]

>
>You know Bob, you've really got too much time on your hands.
>
>I now think that you deserve the attention that Mr. McCarty gives you.
>
>

I now think he IS McCarty. They are one and the same yes?

[Lionel]

Bob Morein a écrit :
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>>Bobo goes off his already-teetery rails.
>>
>>
>>>>Just dropped in
>>
>>>It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how temporary.
>>
>>Did you also relish your last outbreak of boils?
>>
>>
>
> "un dîner de con".
>
>
Is it an SOS ?

[Lionel]

Bob Morein a écrit :
> "Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
> m...
>
>>Hello, goofballs:
>>
>>Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
>>which will include a second large AV room and system),
>
>
> It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how temporary.
> Before you resume your important affairs, would you be so kind as to take a
> look at the following website: http://www.jupiter-audio.com , and render an
> apriori estimate as to the probable worth of this product?
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
>
This is what I call :
"Tirer sur l'ambulance"

Hmm, hmm :

"To shot the ambulance"

[Bob Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Bob Morein a écrit :
> > "Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
> > m...
> >
> >>Hello, goofballs:
> >>
> >>Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
> >>which will include a second large AV room and system),
> >
> >
> > It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how temporary.
> > Before you resume your important affairs, would you be so kind as to
take a
> > look at the following website: http://www.jupiter-audio.com , and render
an
> > apriori estimate as to the probable worth of this product?
> >
> > Thank you for your time.
> >
> >
> This is what I call :
> "Tirer sur l'ambulance"
>
> Hmm, hmm :
>
> "To shot the ambulance"
>
Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.
Some might accuse me of trolling, but I had two specific persons in mind for
the cockfight.

[Lionel]

Bob Morein a écrit :

> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Bob Morein a écrit :
>>
>>>"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
m...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hello, goofballs:
>>>>
>>>>Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
>>>>which will include a second large AV room and system),
>>>
>>>
>>>It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how temporary.
>>>Before you resume your important affairs, would you be so kind as to
>
> take a
>
>>>look at the following website: http://www.jupiter-audio.com , and render
>
> an
>
>>>apriori estimate as to the probable worth of this product?
>>>
>>>Thank you for your time.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>This is what I call :
>>"Tirer sur l'ambulance"
>>
>>Hmm, hmm :
>>
>>"To shot the ambulance"
>>
>
> Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.

In military tradition it's not "fair" to shot an ambulance...
The soldiers in are already wounded, "out of fight" !

[Bob Morein]

"Lionel" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
...
> Bob Morein a écrit :
>
> > "Lionel" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>Bob Morein a écrit :
> >>
> >>>"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
> m...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hello, goofballs:
> >>>>
> >>>>Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
> >>>>which will include a second large AV room and system),
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how
temporary.
> >>>Before you resume your important affairs, would you be so kind as to
> >
> > take a
> >
> >>>look at the following website: http://www.jupiter-audio.com , and
render
> >
> > an
> >
> >>>apriori estimate as to the probable worth of this product?
> >>>
> >>>Thank you for your time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>This is what I call :
> >>"Tirer sur l'ambulance"
> >>
> >>Hmm, hmm :
> >>
> >>"To shot the ambulance"
> >>
> >
> > Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.
>
> In military tradition it's not "fair" to shot an ambulance...
> The soldiers in are already wounded, "out of fight" !
>
Do you have "Saturday Night Wrestling", ie., Hulkomania, in France?

[Lionel]

Bob Morein a écrit :
> "Lionel" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Bob Morein a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Bob Morein a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hello, goofballs:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
>>>>>>which will include a second large AV room and system),
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It is with great pleasure that I note your return, albeit how
>
> temporary.
>
>>>>>Before you resume your important affairs, would you be so kind as to
>>>
>>>take a
>>>
>>>
>>>>>look at the following website: http://www.jupiter-audio.com , and
>
> render
>
>>>an
>>>
>>>
>>>>>apriori estimate as to the probable worth of this product?
>>>>>
>>>>>Thank you for your time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>This is what I call :
>>>>"Tirer sur l'ambulance"
>>>>
>>>>Hmm, hmm :
>>>>
>>>>"To shot the ambulance"
>>>>
>>>
>>>Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.
>>
>>In military tradition it's not "fair" to shot an ambulance...
>>The soldiers in are already wounded, "out of fight" !
>>
>
> Do you have "Saturday Night Wrestling", ie., Hulkomania, in France?
>
>
No, how lucky we are ! This is typically US.
I must temperate that saying : perhaps in 5 to 10 years ! :-)

[tor b]

> First we "lost" Ferstler;........

Can you say that............ I mean the "we" part?

>
>So I thought that in the short term, I'd try to arrange a petty-weight
>equivalent to the Tyson-Foreman match.
>

And you did this by making things up about Tratski's Return Policy yes? And by
guessing and assuming and attributing to him behaviors that are unfounded.
Perhaps these are behaviors from your own personal history yes?

>As it stands, r.a.o. has conflict on every page.

Why then the need for your contrived "petty-weight match"?

Maybe you should return now to New Zealand.

[Bob Morein]

"tor b" > wrote in message
...
> > First we "lost" Ferstler;........
>
> Can you say that............ I mean the "we" part?
>
> >
> >So I thought that in the short term, I'd try to arrange a petty-weight
> >equivalent to the Tyson-Foreman match.
> >
>
> And you did this by making things up about Tratski's Return Policy yes?
And by
> guessing and assuming and attributing to him behaviors that are unfounded.
> Perhaps these are behaviors from your own personal history yes?
>
> >As it stands, r.a.o. has conflict on every page.
>
> Why then the need for your contrived "petty-weight match"?
>
> Maybe you should return now to New Zealand.

Tor,
You think I'm McCarty?
If by New Zealand, you mean that I'm McCarty, call me at (215) 646-4894.
I live near Philadelphia.

With respect to his return policy, I do not dispute his statement of such. I
doubt that he has the money to cover even the return of ten pairs of
speakers, since $13,000 usually has immediate uses for an unemployed person.

Quoting from the "technical questions thread", Trotsky admits he is selling
the prototype:
" [McKelvy]
It sounds to me like the first prototype you produced is effectively
the final design. Is that correct?

[Trotsky]
Yes. The only thing I played with was the amount of insulation in the
cabinet. And wiring the tweeters in correct phase, of course.

[McKelvy]
> How much tweaking was involved?

[Trotsky]
None, really. I know I'm supposed to play with crossover values and
port lengths and such, but the biggest flaws I found in the sonic
presentation were what I deemed to be limitations in the drivers
themselves. I think I got lucky, because as you know, I'm pretty
particular about sound. I'm kind of looking forward to dave's reaction.
Obviously he doesn't have any reasons to do me any favors, so I doubt
he'll fudge the truth."

Tor, you may accuse me of being overly critical, but my opinion regarding
Trotsky's enterprise is honestly given. He is quite literally a fraud.
Specifications were given on his website which he admits he never measured.

Consequently, it is my belief that his enterprise should end as quickly as
possible.
I do not hide the fact that I despise Trotsky as a person, as much as I do
Howard.

[George M. Middius]

Bobo, your brain muscle has gone to sleep again.

> " [McKelvy]
> [McKelvy]

Those comments were not made by the Bug Eater. They were made by
Dormer. Christ.

[Bob Morein]

"Lionel" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
...
> Bob Morein a écrit :
[snip]
> >>>Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.
> >>
> >>In military tradition it's not "fair" to shot an ambulance...
> >>The soldiers in are already wounded, "out of fight" !
> >>
> >
> > Do you have "Saturday Night Wrestling", ie., Hulkomania, in France?
> >
> >
> No, how lucky we are ! This is typically US.
> I must temperate that saying : perhaps in 5 to 10 years ! :-)
>
I saw a French movie about "wit" in the court of Louis XIV. A minor noble
from the provinces comes to court to obtain funding to drain the swamps that
make his villagers ill. To obtain support, he has to become "witty", in the
savage way of the court. Do you know the name of this flick?

[George M. Middius]

Bobo said:

> I saw a French movie about "wit" in the court of Louis XIV. A minor noble
> from the provinces comes to court to obtain funding to drain the swamps that
> make his villagers ill. To obtain support, he has to become "witty", in the
> savage way of the court. Do you know the name of this flick?

Ce film s'appellait "Ridicule". I liked it too.

BTW, Lionella is now pretending to be a four-legged beast. Tread
carefully.

[Nousaine]

(tor b) wrote:



>Can you say that............ I mean the "we" part?
>
>>
>>So I thought that in the short term, I'd try to arrange a petty-weight
>>equivalent to the Tyson-Foreman match.

Tyson-Foreman ????????????

[Lionel]

George M. Middius a écrit :
>
> Bobo said:
>
>
>>I saw a French movie about "wit" in the court of Louis XIV. A minor noble
>>from the provinces comes to court to obtain funding to drain the swamps that
>>make his villagers ill. To obtain support, he has to become "witty", in the
>>savage way of the court. Do you know the name of this flick?
>
>
> Ce film s'appellait "Ridicule". I liked it too.
>

You liked it, I'm not surprised.
You are an intelligent person Georgetta but as I've told you before you
have a cruel lack of self-derision.
You love to play with words, you love to plot intrigues, you seem to
have a lot of free time in you hands... I suggest you to learn French
this is the perfect language to show these *talents* to advantage.
May I hope to see you in the futur on a French speaking NG ?

[Lionel]

George M. Middius a écrit :

> Ce film s'appellait "Ridicule". I liked it too.
>
> BTW, Lionella is now pretending to be a four-legged beast. Tread
> carefully.
>
>

Oh Georgetta mia,

If you you really want to hunt me, let me give you an advice...
Change your dogs !

LOL !

[Lionel]

Bob Morein a écrit :
> "Lionel" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Bob Morein a écrit :
>
> [snip]
>
>>>>>Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.
>>>>
>>>>In military tradition it's not "fair" to shot an ambulance...
>>>>The soldiers in are already wounded, "out of fight" !
>>>>
>>>
>>>Do you have "Saturday Night Wrestling", ie., Hulkomania, in France?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>No, how lucky we are ! This is typically US.
>>I must temperate that saying : perhaps in 5 to 10 years ! :-)
>>
>
> I saw a French movie about "wit" in the court of Louis XIV. A minor noble
> from the provinces comes to court to obtain funding to drain the swamps that
> make his villagers ill. To obtain support, he has to become "witty", in the
> savage way of the court. Do you know the name of this flick?
>
>
Yes I know at the end this is the same sport ! ;-)

Speaking sport strategy Bob, I would like to bring my observations to
your well-known clever analyze.

It seems me that taking advantage of Mr. Krueger's vacations,
opportunist and underhand than ever, George "Gollum" Middius try to take
possession of RAO.

Let me have your point,

Lionel

[Bob Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Bob Morein a écrit :
> > "Lionel" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>Bob Morein a écrit :
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >>>>>Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.
> >>>>
> >>>>In military tradition it's not "fair" to shot an ambulance...
> >>>>The soldiers in are already wounded, "out of fight" !
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Do you have "Saturday Night Wrestling", ie., Hulkomania, in France?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>No, how lucky we are ! This is typically US.
> >>I must temperate that saying : perhaps in 5 to 10 years ! :-)
> >>
> >
> > I saw a French movie about "wit" in the court of Louis XIV. A minor
noble
> > from the provinces comes to court to obtain funding to drain the swamps
that
> > make his villagers ill. To obtain support, he has to become "witty", in
the
> > savage way of the court. Do you know the name of this flick?
> >
> >
> Yes I know at the end this is the same sport ! ;-)
>
> Speaking sport strategy Bob, I would like to bring my observations to
> your well-known clever analyze.
>
> It seems me that taking advantage of Mr. Krueger's vacations,
> opportunist and underhand than ever, George "Gollum" Middius try to take
> possession of RAO.
>
> Let me have your point,
>
> Lionel
>
I don't know.
The pattern of exchange seems very similar to "Ridicule".
Each poster revels in the moment when his witticism appears.
A successful post is one which succeeds in ridicule without exposing to
counterattack.
By that metric, George is one of the most successful, perhaps THE MOST
successful, of posters on r.a.o. It is a shame he cannot redeem this success
for an alarm clock, toaster oven, or set of table napkins.

Arny, by contrast, is the Buddhist monk who immolates himself in Saigon or
Pnomh Penh. By some trick with flames, he manages to do it again and again.
Perhaps his current absence is a result of accidental burns.

I don't think George wants to own r.a.o. After all, what kind of Court would
it be, without fools to ridicule? That is why I invited Ferstler to dine
with us, but unfortunately, he seems to have declined.

[Lionel]

Bob Morein a écrit :
> "Lionel" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Bob Morein a écrit :
>
> [snip]
>
>>>>>Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.
>>>>
>>>>In military tradition it's not "fair" to shot an ambulance...
>>>>The soldiers in are already wounded, "out of fight" !
>>>>
>>>
>>>Do you have "Saturday Night Wrestling", ie., Hulkomania, in France?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>No, how lucky we are ! This is typically US.
>>I must temperate that saying : perhaps in 5 to 10 years ! :-)
>>
>
> I saw a French movie about "wit" in the court of Louis XIV. A minor noble
> from the provinces comes to court to obtain funding to drain the swamps that
> make his villagers ill. To obtain support, he has to become "witty", in the
> savage way of the court. Do you know the name of this flick?
>
>
http://www.ecrannoir.fr/films/96/ridicule.htm
http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/r/ridicule.html

I liked a lot, the rythm is very good... But just a negative comment (I
must) the end is too much "holywoodienne" for me.

[Lionel]

Bob Morein a écrit :
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Bob Morein a écrit :
>>
>>>"Lionel" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Bob Morein a écrit :
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In military tradition it's not "fair" to shot an ambulance...
>>>>>>The soldiers in are already wounded, "out of fight" !
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you have "Saturday Night Wrestling", ie., Hulkomania, in France?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No, how lucky we are ! This is typically US.
>>>>I must temperate that saying : perhaps in 5 to 10 years ! :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>>I saw a French movie about "wit" in the court of Louis XIV. A minor
>
> noble
>
>>>from the provinces comes to court to obtain funding to drain the swamps
>
> that
>
>>>make his villagers ill. To obtain support, he has to become "witty", in
>
> the
>
>>>savage way of the court. Do you know the name of this flick?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Yes I know at the end this is the same sport ! ;-)
>>
>>Speaking sport strategy Bob, I would like to bring my observations to
>>your well-known clever analyze.
>>
>>It seems me that taking advantage of Mr. Krueger's vacations,
>>opportunist and underhand than ever, George "Gollum" Middius try to take
>>possession of RAO.
>>
>>Let me have your point,
>>
>>Lionel
>>
>
> I don't know.
> The pattern of exchange seems very similar to "Ridicule".
> Each poster revels in the moment when his witticism appears.
> A successful post is one which succeeds in ridicule without exposing to
> counterattack.
> By that metric, George is one of the most successful, perhaps THE MOST
> successful, of posters on r.a.o. It is a shame he cannot redeem this success
> for an alarm clock, toaster oven, or set of table napkins.

LOL

>
> Arny, by contrast, is the Buddhist monk who immolates himself in Saigon or
> Pnomh Penh. By some trick with flames, he manages to do it again and again.
> Perhaps his current absence is a result of accidental burns.

LOL again
>
> I don't think George wants to own r.a.o. After all, what kind of Court would
> it be, without fools to ridicule? That is why I invited Ferstler to dine
> with us, but unfortunately, he seems to have declined.
>
It was a good idea, he just needs few "masochist-pleasure" lessons from
Trotsky !

>
Very good analyze, I like it. I know that I could put trust in you !

[Bob Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Bob Morein a écrit :
> > "Lionel" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>Bob Morein a écrit :
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >>>>>Sounds funny, but I'm missing the point.
> >>>>
> >>>>In military tradition it's not "fair" to shot an ambulance...
> >>>>The soldiers in are already wounded, "out of fight" !
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Do you have "Saturday Night Wrestling", ie., Hulkomania, in France?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>No, how lucky we are ! This is typically US.
> >>I must temperate that saying : perhaps in 5 to 10 years ! :-)
> >>
> >
> > I saw a French movie about "wit" in the court of Louis XIV. A minor
noble
> > from the provinces comes to court to obtain funding to drain the swamps
that
> > make his villagers ill. To obtain support, he has to become "witty", in
the
> > savage way of the court. Do you know the name of this flick?
> >
> >
> http://www.ecrannoir.fr/films/96/ridicule.htm
> http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/r/ridicule.html
>
> I liked a lot, the rythm is very good... But just a negative comment (I
> must) the end is too much "holywoodienne" for me.
>
You know the definition of a "Russian comedy"?
Everybody dies.

[dave weil]

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:06:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>Any mystery about my location other than here during the past two weeks
>would be a product of rank ignorance:

One week you were here and the other week you were on vacation.

<shrug>

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:06:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
> >Any mystery about my location other than here during the past two weeks
> >would be a product of rank ignorance:
>
> One week you were here and the other week you were on vacation.
>
> <shrug>

Wrong again.

Anybody who called my office phone (well known, posted on RAO, posted on the
web) got the straight story. So much for the quality of research by RAO
trolls.

[dave weil]

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:48:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>
>"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:06:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Any mystery about my location other than here during the past two weeks
>> >would be a product of rank ignorance:
>>
>> One week you were here and the other week you were on vacation.
>>
>> <shrug>
>
>Wrong again.
>
>Anybody who called my office phone (well known, posted on RAO, posted on the
>web) got the straight story. So much for the quality of research by RAO
>trolls.
>
You weren't here on RAO on the 13th? The 12? The 11? etc. You haven't
been here *this* week?

Ooops, check that foot, Mr. Krueger.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> "dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:06:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Any mystery about my location other than here during the past two weeks
> > >would be a product of rank ignorance:
> >
> > One week you were here and the other week you were on vacation.
> >
> > <shrug>
>
> Wrong again.
>
> Anybody who called my office phone (well known, posted on RAO, posted on
the
> web) got the straight story. So much for the quality of research by RAO
> trolls.
>
>

Good idea!
Next time you go away I will call.
I love listening to your whiny voice.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said:

> You weren't here on RAO on the 13th? The 12? The 11? etc. You haven't
> been here *this* week?
>
> Ooops, check that foot, Mr. Krueger.

You might be right, but Krooger might also be offering a tacit
admission that he was indeed posting on RAO. Under another name,
that is.

[Lionel]

George M. Middius a écrit :
>
> dave weil said:
>
>
>>You weren't here on RAO on the 13th? The 12? The 11? etc. You haven't
>>been here *this* week?
>>
>>Ooops, check that foot, Mr. Krueger.
>
>
> You might be right, but Krooger might also be offering a tacit
> admission that he was indeed posting on RAO. Under another name,
> that is.
>
>
The Lionellaise ?
LOL !

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:48:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:06:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Any mystery about my location other than here during the past two
weeks
> >> >would be a product of rank ignorance:
> >>
> >> One week you were here and the other week you were on vacation.
> >>
> >> <shrug>
> >
> >Wrong again.
> >
> >Anybody who called my office phone (well known, posted on RAO, posted on
the
> >web) got the straight story. So much for the quality of research by RAO
> >trolls.
> >
> You weren't here on RAO on the 13th? The 12? The 11? etc.

Deceptive. What matters is both the last day I posted here, and the first
day I resumed.

>You haven't been here *this* week?

Irrelevant for reasons already stated.

> Ooops, check that foot, Mr. Krueger.

You claimed I was gone for a "week". That's seven sucessive days. Sunday
through Saturday, for example. Trivial investigations would show I was off
RAO for more than seven straight days. Even more so if you look at the hours
when I posted.

You lose again, Weil.

Do try to check a few facts before you mouth off again!

[dave weil]

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:41:23 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>
>"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:48:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"dave weil" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:06:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Any mystery about my location other than here during the past two
>weeks
>> >> >would be a product of rank ignorance:
>> >>
>> >> One week you were here and the other week you were on vacation.
>> >>
>> >> <shrug>
>> >
>> >Wrong again.
>> >
>> >Anybody who called my office phone (well known, posted on RAO, posted on
>the
>> >web) got the straight story. So much for the quality of research by RAO
>> >trolls.
>> >
>> You weren't here on RAO on the 13th? The 12? The 11? etc.
>
>Deceptive. What matters is both the last day I posted here, and the first
>day I resumed.

That's exactly what I said. You posted on the 13th. 6 times I note.
You have posted on the 23rd. So you posted in week 2 and week 4. Only
week three were you absent from RAO.

You lose.

Again.

>>You haven't been here *this* week?
>
>Irrelevant for reasons already stated.

See above.

>> Ooops, check that foot, Mr. Krueger.
>
>You claimed I was gone for a "week". That's seven sucessive days. Sunday
>through Saturday, for example. Trivial investigations would show I was off
>RAO for more than seven straight days. Even more so if you look at the hours
>when I posted.

A week is Monday through Sunday (unless you're in France when it's
Monday through Monday, or 8 days).

You have posted this week so you weren't gone this week. You were only
gone last week.

>You lose again, Weil.
>
>Do try to check a few facts before you mouth off again!

Sorry, you lose.

Again.

Especailly for assuming that a week only has 7 days!

<g>

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:41:23 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:48:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"dave weil" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:06:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Any mystery about my location other than here during the past two
> >weeks
> >> >> >would be a product of rank ignorance:
> >> >>
> >> >> One week you were here and the other week you were on vacation.
> >> >>
> >> >> <shrug>
> >> >
> >> >Wrong again.
> >> >
> >> >Anybody who called my office phone (well known, posted on RAO, posted
on
> >the
> >> >web) got the straight story. So much for the quality of research by
RAO
> >> >trolls.
> >> >
> >> You weren't here on RAO on the 13th? The 12? The 11? etc.
> >
> >Deceptive. What matters is both the last day I posted here, and the first
> >day I resumed.
>
> That's exactly what I said. You posted on the 13th. 6 times I note.
> You have posted on the 23rd. So you posted in week 2 and week 4. Only
> week three were you absent from RAO.
>
> You lose.
>
> Again.
>
> >>You haven't been here *this* week?
> >
> >Irrelevant for reasons already stated.
>
> See above.
>
> >> Ooops, check that foot, Mr. Krueger.

> >You claimed I was gone for a "week". That's seven sucessive days. Sunday
> >through Saturday, for example. Trivial investigations would show I was
off
> >RAO for more than seven straight days. Even more so if you look at the
hours
> >when I posted.

> A week is Monday through Sunday (unless you're in France when it's
> Monday through Monday, or 8 days).

LOL!

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary

Main Entry: week

1 a : any of a series of 7-day cycles used in various calendars; especially
: a 7-day cycle beginning on Sunday and ending on Saturday

1 b (1) : a week beginning with a specified day or containing a specified
holiday <Easter week> (2) : a week appointed for public recognition of some
cause

2 a : any seven consecutive days

2 b : a series of regular working, business, or school days during each
7-day period

You lose, Weil.

Again, a little fact checking would have saved you quite a bit of difficulty
here.

[Lionel]

Jacob Kramer a écrit :
> "Bob Morein" > wrote in message >...
>
>
>>I saw a French movie about "wit" in the court of Louis XIV. A minor noble
>>from the provinces comes to court to obtain funding to drain the swamps that
>>make his villagers ill. To obtain support, he has to become "witty", in the
>>savage way of the court. Do you know the name of this flick?
>
>
> It was actually the court of Louis XVI, which is an important
> distinction. Louis XIV was the Sun King, who epitomized absolute
> monarchy, built the Palace of Versailles, and inspired imitators
> across Europe. Louis XVI, well, he ended up with his head in a
> basket. The movie is at least in part a commentary on the twilight of
> a ruling class that valued its parlor games more than the needs of the
> peasantry, so if that tells you anything about the flamebait you were
> attempting to elicit from Ferstler and the public's understanding of
> high-quality audio, maybe this excursus means something.

I'm not exactly agree with you, but just a few point. Please, allow me
to use your words because my english...
The people are evaluated in their skill in parlor games more than in
their skill in works.
You find the word "ridicule" in a famous Molière's play : "Les
précieuses ridicules", this one has been written under Louis XIV, the
subject is the same :
Who deserves glory and the fame?
- The one who has a lot of skill in parlor games, the one who is the
more "witty"
- The one who produces, who acts.

Bob just point here a particular aspect of the movie : the rule of the
parlor games. On this point I must be agree with him : RAO obeys the
same rules.

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed french Clown