Re: Return of thread to the Stereophile Forums

[SSJVCmag]

On 9/8/05 12:54 PM, in article , "Arny
Krueger" > wrote:

> What we'll never know is what would have happened without
> all the adverse publicity.
>
>
Arny...again... could you delete all but the MOST necessary crosspost
addresses? This rumored thread was apologised-about across a plethora of
NG's that
NEVER had seen (nor wanted to) anything about it at all...
Likely they don't care about the apologies and explanations about the
troll-sniping of the thread they never knew about to begin with either.
Let's go back to that quietude... Ok?
thanks

[SSJVCmag]

In a gratuitous crosspost to these groups:
rec.audio.opinion,
rec.audio.tech,
rec.audio.pro,
rec.audio.tubes and
rec.audio.misc,
"Ben Bradley" > wrote:

> Now that I know that forum's editorial policy, I can plan on using
> it just as much as I've done so during all my previous years on the
> Internet.

Yo Ben, that's allfired real interestin' an all but, rather than acting like
a goat, couldn't you just delete all but the MOST necessary crosspost
addresses? This rumored thread was apologised-about across a plethora of
NG's that
NEVER had seen (nor wanted to) anything about it at all...
Likely they don't care about the apologies and explanations about the
troll-sniping of the thread they never knew about to begin with either.
Let's go back to that quietude... Ok?
thanks>

[Arny Krueger]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message

> > wrote in message
> oups.com
>> The thread "Any questions or comments about the HE2005
>> debate" has been returned to the Stereophile Forums. The
>> troublesome post from Xenophanes has been cleansed of
>> both it's negative comments regarding JA and it's
>> reference to an article in a competing magazine. The post
>> is now acceptable. Let this be a lesson to all posters:
>> posts negative to Stereophile and/or JA, however polite
>> and flame free, will not be tolerated.
>> Hail Atkinson!

> What we'll never know is what would have happened without
> all the adverse publicity.

BTW, check this post out:

John Atkinson: Re: Why is Blind Testing Such a Hot Button?
[Re: Arny Krueger]
#450 - 09/08/05 01:39 PM (216.89.203.60)

"Mr. Krueger, I request you keep your distortions of the
truth to other forums."

I think John just called me a liar!

Will this be moderated?

;-)

[Robert Morein]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
[snip]
> "Mr. Krueger, I request you keep your distortions of the
> truth to other forums."
>
> I think John just called me a liar!
>
> Will this be moderated?
>
> ;-)
>
Arny, rec.audio.opinion is the forum for lies, smears, slander, and
innuendo. Try not to stray too far.

[George M. Middius]

AutoLiarBorg lied:

> "Mr. Krueger, I request you keep your distortions of the
> truth to other forums."
>
> I think John just called me a liar!

Here's the entire, unedited post that ****-for-Brains is referring to:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

>Some amps are more difficult for amps to drive than others.
>This may have been an issue in the ages-old DBT that John
>Atkinson keeps bringing up again and again, but never
>provides any relevant details about.

Mr. Krueger, I request you keep your distortions of the truth to other
forums. In the case of the 1978 blind listening test of amplifiers I have,
both elsewhere and on this board, informed you that these test were
described in exhaustive detail in the November 1978 issue of Hi-Fi News.
Yes, that article is not yet available in that magazine's on-line
archives, but it would not be appropriate for me to post it on the
Stereophile website without permission.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

As any sane person can see, JA lays out exactly what he means by
"distortions of the truth".

> Will this be moderated?

Turdy, your misbegotten comments about other posters' supposedly limited
intelligence were much snottier. None of your gratuitous insults is ever
based in fact, but JA's entirely reasonable caution about your compulsive
lying was supported directly by facts.


The best thing about Stereophile's new forum is that ****borg is now
heavily occupied there, and consequently has little time to pollute RAO.
Let's enjoy the reduced Kroofestation here while we can. It's only a
matter of time before Turdy is banned from Stereophile just like he was
banned from RAH-E and several other online forums.