SACD Remastering Scam Revealed!

[Arny Krueger]

Those of us who have remained skeptical after reading glowing reports of
tremendously improved sound quality due to the wider bandwidth of SACD and
DVD-A can find quite a bit of vindication in this report:

http://world.std.com/~griesngr/intermod.ppt

Basically it shows that SACDs come in two flavors - those with absolutely no
music above 22 KHz (your typical remastered recording) or those with
negligible music above 22 KHz (your typical new recording).

The author of this report is a well-known expert who has been studying the
requirements for more lifelike reproduction of music for decades, and has a
number of successful products to his credit.

I see just another indication of how unreliable the high end establishment
is as a source of information about what actually sounds better.

[Arny Krueger]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message

> Those of us who have remained skeptical after reading glowing reports
> of tremendously improved sound quality due to the wider bandwidth of
> SACD and DVD-A can find quite a bit of vindication in this report:
>
> http://world.std.com/~griesngr/intermod.ppt
>
> Basically it shows that SACDs come in two flavors - those with
> absolutely no music above 22 KHz (your typical remastered recording)
> or those with negligible music above 22 KHz (your typical new
> recording).
>
> The author of this report is a well-known expert who has been
> studying the requirements for more lifelike reproduction of music for
> decades, and has a number of successful products to his credit.
>
> I see just another indication of how unreliable the high end
> establishment is as a source of information about what actually
> sounds better.

Notice that David Weil our local SACD/DVD-A promoter, has posted replies to
many posts of mine since I put this one up, but not this one.

Must be Kryptonite!

[dave weil]

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:16:03 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message

>> Those of us who have remained skeptical after reading glowing reports
>> of tremendously improved sound quality due to the wider bandwidth of
>> SACD and DVD-A can find quite a bit of vindication in this report:
>>
>> http://world.std.com/~griesngr/intermod.ppt
>>
>> Basically it shows that SACDs come in two flavors - those with
>> absolutely no music above 22 KHz (your typical remastered recording)
>> or those with negligible music above 22 KHz (your typical new
>> recording).
>>
>> The author of this report is a well-known expert who has been
>> studying the requirements for more lifelike reproduction of music for
>> decades, and has a number of successful products to his credit.
>>
>> I see just another indication of how unreliable the high end
>> establishment is as a source of information about what actually
>> sounds better.
>
>Notice that David Weil our local SACD/DVD-A promoter, has posted replies to
>many posts of mine since I put this one up, but not this one.
>
>Must be Kryptonite!
>
Incidentally, I've never *promoted* SACD/DVDA. I've never heard either
format.

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message

> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:16:03 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>
>>> Those of us who have remained skeptical after reading glowing
>>> reports of tremendously improved sound quality due to the wider
>>> bandwidth of SACD and DVD-A can find quite a bit of vindication in
>>> this report:
>>>
>>> http://world.std.com/~griesngr/intermod.ppt
>>>
>>> Basically it shows that SACDs come in two flavors - those with
>>> absolutely no music above 22 KHz (your typical remastered recording)
>>> or those with negligible music above 22 KHz (your typical new
>>> recording).
>>>
>>> The author of this report is a well-known expert who has been
>>> studying the requirements for more lifelike reproduction of music
>>> for decades, and has a number of successful products to his credit.
>>>
>>> I see just another indication of how unreliable the high end
>>> establishment is as a source of information about what actually
>>> sounds better.
>>
>> Notice that David Weil our local SACD/DVD-A promoter, has posted
>> replies to many posts of mine since I put this one up, but not this
>> one.

>> Must be Kryptonite!

> No, must be that I can't read powerpoint documents.

Since obviously you need a clue so badly Weil, let me point out

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7C404E8E-5513-46C4-
AA4F-058A84A37DF1

[dave weil]

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:27:28 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"dave weil" > wrote in message

>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:16:03 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> Those of us who have remained skeptical after reading glowing
>>>> reports of tremendously improved sound quality due to the wider
>>>> bandwidth of SACD and DVD-A can find quite a bit of vindication in
>>>> this report:
>>>>
>>>> http://world.std.com/~griesngr/intermod.ppt
>>>>
>>>> Basically it shows that SACDs come in two flavors - those with
>>>> absolutely no music above 22 KHz (your typical remastered recording)
>>>> or those with negligible music above 22 KHz (your typical new
>>>> recording).
>>>>
>>>> The author of this report is a well-known expert who has been
>>>> studying the requirements for more lifelike reproduction of music
>>>> for decades, and has a number of successful products to his credit.
>>>>
>>>> I see just another indication of how unreliable the high end
>>>> establishment is as a source of information about what actually
>>>> sounds better.
>>>
>>> Notice that David Weil our local SACD/DVD-A promoter, has posted
>>> replies to many posts of mine since I put this one up, but not this
>>> one.
>
>>> Must be Kryptonite!
>
>> No, must be that I can't read powerpoint documents.
>
>Since obviously you need a clue so badly Weil, let me point out
>
>http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7C404E8E-5513-46C4-AA4F-058A84A37DF1

Snideness, notwithstanding, thank you.

[GeoSynch]

dave weil wrote:

> No, must be that I can't read powerpoint documents.

Be careful opening any MS Office (Access, Excel, Word & PowerPoint)
or MS Project or MS Visio documents. There's a VBA flaw that can be
exploited with a buffer overflow by a malicious hacker.

Get all the necessary critical patches from this link:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-037.asp


GeoSynch

[Lionel Chapuis]

GeoSynch a écrit :

> dave weil wrote:
>
>
>>No, must be that I can't read powerpoint documents.
>
>
> Be careful opening any MS Office (Access, Excel, Word & PowerPoint)
> or MS Project or MS Visio documents. There's a VBA flaw that can be
> exploited with a buffer overflow by a malicious hacker.
>
> Get all the necessary critical patches from this link:
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-037.asp
>
>
> GeoSynch
>
>
Too late GeoSynch, the virus is already in...
Thanks anyway.

Lionel