Two billion years ago, an animal crept out of the sea...

[Robert Morein]

Students of the fossil record christened it the mckelviphibian. It
pulled itself along the mud of the tidal flats, on spiny fins. Measurements
of the minute cranial cavity suggest a brain weight of about a gram.
Nevertheless, the mckelviphibian's lowly existence on earth overlapped that
of early sauropods.

The mckelviphibian fossil record is intermingled with that of the
krugersaurus, a small, bipedal sauropod that lived in the forest. While the
krugersaurus was formerly thought to be an ambush hunter of early mammals,
it is now believed it was a carrion feeder.

Why an early mckelviphibian should be found in the same fossil record as
the krugersaurus is one of the great mysteries of paleontology. Recently,
however, evidence suggests that the two had a symbiotic existence. The
mkckelviphibian was actually what scientists call a coprophage. To the
benefit of the krugersaurus, the mckelviphibian was a distraction to
predators that might prey on it; a completely expendable ally. The brains of
both these animals were so small, however, it is scarcely possible they
could have been aware of the arrangement.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
> Students of the fossil record christened it the mckelviphibian. It
> pulled itself along the mud of the tidal flats, on spiny fins.
> Measurements
> of the minute cranial cavity suggest a brain weight of about a gram.
> Nevertheless, the mckelviphibian's lowly existence on earth overlapped
> that
> of early sauropods.
>
> The mckelviphibian fossil record is intermingled with that of the
> krugersaurus, a small, bipedal sauropod that lived in the forest. While
> the
> krugersaurus was formerly thought to be an ambush hunter of early mammals,
> it is now believed it was a carrion feeder.
>
> Why an early mckelviphibian should be found in the same fossil record
> as
> the krugersaurus is one of the great mysteries of paleontology. Recently,
> however, evidence suggests that the two had a symbiotic existence. The
> mkckelviphibian was actually what scientists call a coprophage. To the
> benefit of the krugersaurus, the mckelviphibian was a distraction to
> predators that might prey on it; a completely expendable ally. The brains
> of
> both these animals were so small, however, it is scarcely possible they
> could have been aware of the arrangement.
>
So now we have evidence of why you are a failed writer.

[paul packer]

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:08:34 GMT, "
> wrote:

>
>"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>> Students of the fossil record christened it the mckelviphibian. It
>> pulled itself along the mud of the tidal flats, on spiny fins.
>> Measurements
>> of the minute cranial cavity suggest a brain weight of about a gram.
>> Nevertheless, the mckelviphibian's lowly existence on earth overlapped
>> that
>> of early sauropods.
>>
>> The mckelviphibian fossil record is intermingled with that of the
>> krugersaurus, a small, bipedal sauropod that lived in the forest. While
>> the
>> krugersaurus was formerly thought to be an ambush hunter of early mammals,
>> it is now believed it was a carrion feeder.
>>
>> Why an early mckelviphibian should be found in the same fossil record
>> as
>> the krugersaurus is one of the great mysteries of paleontology. Recently,
>> however, evidence suggests that the two had a symbiotic existence. The
>> mkckelviphibian was actually what scientists call a coprophage. To the
>> benefit of the krugersaurus, the mckelviphibian was a distraction to
>> predators that might prey on it; a completely expendable ally. The brains
>> of
>> both these animals were so small, however, it is scarcely possible they
>> could have been aware of the arrangement.
>>
>So now we have evidence of why you are a failed writer.

Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?

[George M. Middius]

paul packer said:

> >So now we have evidence of why you are a failed writer.

> Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?

Mickey only thinks something's funny if Arnii "declares" it funny. This is
the latest regulation in the "debating trade" handbook.

[[email protected]]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:08:34 GMT, "
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>>> Students of the fossil record christened it the mckelviphibian. It
>>> pulled itself along the mud of the tidal flats, on spiny fins.
>>> Measurements
>>> of the minute cranial cavity suggest a brain weight of about a gram.
>>> Nevertheless, the mckelviphibian's lowly existence on earth overlapped
>>> that
>>> of early sauropods.
>>>
>>> The mckelviphibian fossil record is intermingled with that of the
>>> krugersaurus, a small, bipedal sauropod that lived in the forest. While
>>> the
>>> krugersaurus was formerly thought to be an ambush hunter of early
>>> mammals,
>>> it is now believed it was a carrion feeder.
>>>
>>> Why an early mckelviphibian should be found in the same fossil record
>>> as
>>> the krugersaurus is one of the great mysteries of paleontology.
>>> Recently,
>>> however, evidence suggests that the two had a symbiotic existence. The
>>> mkckelviphibian was actually what scientists call a coprophage. To the
>>> benefit of the krugersaurus, the mckelviphibian was a distraction to
>>> predators that might prey on it; a completely expendable ally. The
>>> brains
>>> of
>>> both these animals were so small, however, it is scarcely possible they
>>> could have been aware of the arrangement.
>>>
>>So now we have evidence of why you are a failed writer.
>
> Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?

Sure I can, I posted one just last night, that is related to my typing
problem, (it is not a spelling problem), under the title Bad Spellers of the
World.

It just that as a normal practice, I don't start threads with people's names
in them. I have done so in the past but only after much provocation, (IMO).

This particular "joke" comes on the heels of several posts by Bob claiming
that I don't belong here, so yeah, I don't find it all that funny.

[[email protected]]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> paul packer said:
>
>> >So now we have evidence of why you are a failed writer.
>
>> Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?
>
> Mickey only thinks something's funny if Arnii "declares" it funny. This is
> the latest regulation in the "debating trade" handbook.
>
>
>
Waiting breathlessly for your first audio post of the year George.
When might we expect that to happen?

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:08:34 GMT, "
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>> Students of the fossil record christened it the mckelviphibian. It
> >>> pulled itself along the mud of the tidal flats, on spiny fins.
> >>> Measurements
> >>> of the minute cranial cavity suggest a brain weight of about a gram.
> >>> Nevertheless, the mckelviphibian's lowly existence on earth overlapped
> >>> that
> >>> of early sauropods.
> >>>
> >>> The mckelviphibian fossil record is intermingled with that of the
> >>> krugersaurus, a small, bipedal sauropod that lived in the forest.
While
> >>> the
> >>> krugersaurus was formerly thought to be an ambush hunter of early
> >>> mammals,
> >>> it is now believed it was a carrion feeder.
> >>>
> >>> Why an early mckelviphibian should be found in the same fossil
record
> >>> as
> >>> the krugersaurus is one of the great mysteries of paleontology.
> >>> Recently,
> >>> however, evidence suggests that the two had a symbiotic existence. The
> >>> mkckelviphibian was actually what scientists call a coprophage. To the
> >>> benefit of the krugersaurus, the mckelviphibian was a distraction to
> >>> predators that might prey on it; a completely expendable ally. The
> >>> brains
> >>> of
> >>> both these animals were so small, however, it is scarcely possible
they
> >>> could have been aware of the arrangement.
> >>>
> >>So now we have evidence of why you are a failed writer.
> >
> > Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?
>
> Sure I can, I posted one just last night, that is related to my typing
> problem, (it is not a spelling problem), under the title Bad Spellers of
the
> World.
>
> It just that as a normal practice, I don't start threads with people's
names
> in them. I have done so in the past but only after much provocation,
(IMO).
>
> This particular "joke" comes on the heels of several posts by Bob claiming
> that I don't belong here, so yeah, I don't find it all that funny.
>
Don't blame me. Blame Darwin.

[paul packer]

On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:19:25 GMT, "
> wrote:


>> Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?
>
>Sure I can, I posted one just last night, that is related to my typing
>problem, (it is not a spelling problem), under the title Bad Spellers of the
>World.

Yes, and that was funny too. I hope it was original?

>This particular "joke" comes on the heels of several posts by Bob claiming
>that I don't belong here, so yeah, I don't find it all that funny.

Personally I'm not a fan of attacking people (let alone excluding
them) on the basis of estimated I.Q., but as I respect Robert's
judgement I have to assume he knows what he's doing. I know there's
been bad blood between you, which is none of my business as I've been
out of RAO for some time. Would it perhaps be time to consider a puff
on the Peace Pipe?

[Robert Morein]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:19:25 GMT, "
> > wrote:
>
>
> >> Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?
> >
> >Sure I can, I posted one just last night, that is related to my typing
> >problem, (it is not a spelling problem), under the title Bad Spellers of
the
> >World.
>
> Yes, and that was funny too. I hope it was original?
>
> >This particular "joke" comes on the heels of several posts by Bob
claiming
> >that I don't belong here, so yeah, I don't find it all that funny.
>
> Personally I'm not a fan of attacking people (let alone excluding
> them) on the basis of estimated I.Q., but as I respect Robert's
> judgement I have to assume he knows what he's doing. I know there's
> been bad blood between you, which is none of my business as I've been
> out of RAO for some time. Would it perhaps be time to consider a puff
> on the Peace Pipe?

How about it, Mikey?
I went after you because when you got your shiny new sockpuppet going, you
used it to post something about the Drexel case in a highly derogatory
fashion.
We could call it quits. What do you say?

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "paul packer" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:08:34 GMT, "
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>> Students of the fossil record christened it the mckelviphibian. It
>> >>> pulled itself along the mud of the tidal flats, on spiny fins.
>> >>> Measurements
>> >>> of the minute cranial cavity suggest a brain weight of about a gram.
>> >>> Nevertheless, the mckelviphibian's lowly existence on earth
>> >>> overlapped
>> >>> that
>> >>> of early sauropods.
>> >>>
>> >>> The mckelviphibian fossil record is intermingled with that of the
>> >>> krugersaurus, a small, bipedal sauropod that lived in the forest.
> While
>> >>> the
>> >>> krugersaurus was formerly thought to be an ambush hunter of early
>> >>> mammals,
>> >>> it is now believed it was a carrion feeder.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why an early mckelviphibian should be found in the same fossil
> record
>> >>> as
>> >>> the krugersaurus is one of the great mysteries of paleontology.
>> >>> Recently,
>> >>> however, evidence suggests that the two had a symbiotic existence.
>> >>> The
>> >>> mkckelviphibian was actually what scientists call a coprophage. To
>> >>> the
>> >>> benefit of the krugersaurus, the mckelviphibian was a distraction to
>> >>> predators that might prey on it; a completely expendable ally. The
>> >>> brains
>> >>> of
>> >>> both these animals were so small, however, it is scarcely possible
> they
>> >>> could have been aware of the arrangement.
>> >>>
>> >>So now we have evidence of why you are a failed writer.
>> >
>> > Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?
>>
>> Sure I can, I posted one just last night, that is related to my typing
>> problem, (it is not a spelling problem), under the title Bad Spellers of
> the
>> World.
>>
>> It just that as a normal practice, I don't start threads with people's
> names
>> in them. I have done so in the past but only after much provocation,
> (IMO).
>>
>> This particular "joke" comes on the heels of several posts by Bob
>> claiming
>> that I don't belong here, so yeah, I don't find it all that funny.
>>
> Don't blame me. Blame Darwin.
>
>
How did Darwin make you an idiot?

[[email protected]]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:19:25 GMT, "
> > wrote:
>
>
>>> Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?
>>
>>Sure I can, I posted one just last night, that is related to my typing
>>problem, (it is not a spelling problem), under the title Bad Spellers of
>>the
>>World.
>
> Yes, and that was funny too. I hope it was original?
>
Actually, it's an old joke, it also works for Dyslexics.

>>This particular "joke" comes on the heels of several posts by Bob claiming
>>that I don't belong here, so yeah, I don't find it all that funny.
>
> Personally I'm not a fan of attacking people (let alone excluding
> them) on the basis of estimated I.Q., but as I respect Robert's
> judgement I have to assume he knows what he's doing.

Why, he's wrong most of the time.

I know there's
> been bad blood between you, which is none of my business as I've been
> out of RAO for some time. Would it perhaps be time to consider a puff
> on the Peace Pipe?

I react to civil behavior with civil behavior, or else I ignore people.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:19:25 GMT, "
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?
>> >
>> >Sure I can, I posted one just last night, that is related to my typing
>> >problem, (it is not a spelling problem), under the title Bad Spellers of
> the
>> >World.
>>
>> Yes, and that was funny too. I hope it was original?
>>
>> >This particular "joke" comes on the heels of several posts by Bob
> claiming
>> >that I don't belong here, so yeah, I don't find it all that funny.
>>
>> Personally I'm not a fan of attacking people (let alone excluding
>> them) on the basis of estimated I.Q., but as I respect Robert's
>> judgement I have to assume he knows what he's doing. I know there's
>> been bad blood between you, which is none of my business as I've been
>> out of RAO for some time. Would it perhaps be time to consider a puff
>> on the Peace Pipe?
>
> How about it, Mikey?
> I went after you because when you got your shiny new sockpuppet going, you
> used it to post something about the Drexel case in a highly derogatory
> fashion.

Refresh my memory.

> We could call it quits. What do you say?
>
>

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
nk.net...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:19:25 GMT, "
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?
> >>
> >>Sure I can, I posted one just last night, that is related to my typing
> >>problem, (it is not a spelling problem), under the title Bad Spellers of
> >>the
> >>World.
> >
> > Yes, and that was funny too. I hope it was original?
> >
> Actually, it's an old joke, it also works for Dyslexics.
>
> >>This particular "joke" comes on the heels of several posts by Bob
claiming
> >>that I don't belong here, so yeah, I don't find it all that funny.
> >
> > Personally I'm not a fan of attacking people (let alone excluding
> > them) on the basis of estimated I.Q., but as I respect Robert's
> > judgement I have to assume he knows what he's doing.
>
> Why, he's wrong most of the time.
>
Let me rewrite this for you. "Why? He's wrong most of the time."
You have serious problems with grammar as well as spelling.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> nk.net...
>>
>> "paul packer" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:19:25 GMT, "
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>> Disagree. It's well written and funny. Can't you take a joke?
>> >>
>> >>Sure I can, I posted one just last night, that is related to my typing
>> >>problem, (it is not a spelling problem), under the title Bad Spellers
>> >>of
>> >>the
>> >>World.
>> >
>> > Yes, and that was funny too. I hope it was original?
>> >
>> Actually, it's an old joke, it also works for Dyslexics.
>>
>> >>This particular "joke" comes on the heels of several posts by Bob
> claiming
>> >>that I don't belong here, so yeah, I don't find it all that funny.
>> >
>> > Personally I'm not a fan of attacking people (let alone excluding
>> > them) on the basis of estimated I.Q., but as I respect Robert's
>> > judgement I have to assume he knows what he's doing.
>>
>> Why, he's wrong most of the time.
>>
> Let me rewrite this for you. "Why? He's wrong most of the time."
> You have serious problems with grammar as well as spelling.
>
>
So do plenty of people who post here, I don't see you taking them task.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:20:17 GMT, "
> wrote:


>> Let me rewrite this for you. "Why? He's wrong most of the time."
>> You have serious problems with grammar as well as spelling.
>>
>>
>So do plenty of people who post here, I don't see you taking them task.

He does have a point, Robert.

Even if he did use a comma instead of a full stop. :-)

[George M. Middius]

paul packer said:

> >So do plenty of people who post here,[sic] I don't see you taking them task.

> He does have a point, Robert.
> Even if he did use a comma instead of a full stop. :-)

Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:49:11 -0400, George M. Middius <cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote:

>
>
>paul packer said:
>
>> >So do plenty of people who post here,[sic] I don't see you taking them task.
>
>> He does have a point, Robert.
>> Even if he did use a comma instead of a full stop. :-)
>
>Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.

Ever thought of taking a job at the UN, George?

[George M. Middius]

paul packer said:

> >> >So do plenty of people who post here,[sic] I don't see you taking them task.
> >
> >> He does have a point, Robert.
> >> Even if he did use a comma instead of a full stop. :-)
> >
> >Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.
>
> Ever thought of taking a job at the UN, George?

Gibberella isn't stupid, just twisted.

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> paul packer said:
>
>> >So do plenty of people who post here,[sic] I don't see you taking them
>> >task.
>
>> He does have a point, Robert.
>> Even if he did use a comma instead of a full stop. :-)
>
> Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.

and George is rude, arrogant, and hostile.

Robert carries a grudge way too far.

are these reasons for expulsion campaigns?

Packer seems to be needy of joining the bully clique.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Scottie said:

> > Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.

> and George is rude, arrogant, and hostile.

<blush>

I thought you didn't like me, Scottie.

> Robert carries a grudge way too far.
> are these reasons for expulsion campaigns?

You have a strange idea of Robert's agenda. A "campaign" that consists
entirely of badgering an uncouth slope-brow is pretty limited in scope,
wouldn't you say? I'll bet you didn't even read Robert's statement as to
why he's been badgering Mickey.

> Packer seems to be needy of joining the bully clique.

You're Mickey's spiritual successor. A few bonks on the head will bring
you right down to his level.

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Scottie said:
>
>> > Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.
>
>> and George is rude, arrogant, and hostile.
>
> <blush>
>
> I thought you didn't like me, Scottie.

and antisocial.

>
>> Robert carries a grudge way too far.
>> are these reasons for expulsion campaigns?
>
> You have a strange idea of Robert's agenda. A "campaign" that consists
> entirely of badgering an uncouth slope-brow is pretty limited in scope,
> wouldn't you say?

What else can one do on usenet. Leave it to you to advocate
going "real world".

> I'll bet you didn't even read Robert's statement as to
> why he's been badgering Mickey.

I saw more than one. Consistency isn't a Morein fort`e.
>
>> Packer seems to be needy of joining the bully clique.
>
> You're Mickey's spiritual successor. A few bonks on the head will bring
> you right down to his level.

What brought you down to your level?

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:UTHSe.111661$Ep.105420@lakeread02...
>
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
wrote
> in message ...
> >
> >
> > Scottie said:
> >
> >> > Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.
> >
> >> and George is rude, arrogant, and hostile.
> >
> > <blush>
> >
> > I thought you didn't like me, Scottie.
>
> and antisocial.
>
> >
> >> Robert carries a grudge way too far.
> >> are these reasons for expulsion campaigns?
> >
> > You have a strange idea of Robert's agenda. A "campaign" that consists
> > entirely of badgering an uncouth slope-brow is pretty limited in scope,
> > wouldn't you say?
>
> What else can one do on usenet. Leave it to you to advocate
> going "real world".
>
> > I'll bet you didn't even read Robert's statement as to
> > why he's been badgering Mickey.
>
> I saw more than one. Consistency isn't a Morein fort`e.
> >
Aw, come on, Scott. You're not a slope-head.
See http://hyperdictionary.com/search.aspx?define=forte

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:UTHSe.111661$Ep.105420@lakeread02...
>>
>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote
>> in message ...
>> >
>> >
>> > Scottie said:
>> >
>> >> > Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.
>> >
>> >> and George is rude, arrogant, and hostile.
>> >
>> > <blush>
>> >
>> > I thought you didn't like me, Scottie.
>>
>> and antisocial.
>>
>> >
>> >> Robert carries a grudge way too far.
>> >> are these reasons for expulsion campaigns?
>> >
>> > You have a strange idea of Robert's agenda. A "campaign" that consists
>> > entirely of badgering an uncouth slope-brow is pretty limited in scope,
>> > wouldn't you say?
>>
>> What else can one do on usenet. Leave it to you to advocate
>> going "real world".
>>
>> > I'll bet you didn't even read Robert's statement as to
>> > why he's been badgering Mickey.
>>
>> I saw more than one. Consistency isn't a Morein fort`e.
>> >
> Aw, come on, Scott. You're not a slope-head.

You, just, don't, get, it, do, you, Bob.,

ScottW

[paul packer]

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 09:55:59 -0700, "ScottW" >
wrote:


> Packer seems to be needy of joining the bully clique.

If this means what I think it means, there's no evidence for it
whatsoever. Read my posts again.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:20:17 GMT, "
> wrote:


>> Let me rewrite this for you. "Why? He's wrong most of the time."
>> You have serious problems with grammar as well as spelling.
>>
>>
>So do plenty of people who post here, I don't see you taking them task.

Mike, despite unhelpful heckling from the onlookers, I believe Robert
did hold out the olive branch to you. Maybe you'd better grab it
before it turns into a sword again, sharper than before.

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:6_OSe.111694$Ep.98400@lakeread02...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > news:UTHSe.111661$Ep.105420@lakeread02...
> >>
> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> > wrote
> >> in message ...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Scottie said:
> >> >
> >> >> > Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.
> >> >
> >> >> and George is rude, arrogant, and hostile.
> >> >
> >> > <blush>
> >> >
> >> > I thought you didn't like me, Scottie.
> >>
> >> and antisocial.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> Robert carries a grudge way too far.
> >> >> are these reasons for expulsion campaigns?
> >> >
> >> > You have a strange idea of Robert's agenda. A "campaign" that
consists
> >> > entirely of badgering an uncouth slope-brow is pretty limited in
scope,
> >> > wouldn't you say?
> >>
> >> What else can one do on usenet. Leave it to you to advocate
> >> going "real world".
> >>
> >> > I'll bet you didn't even read Robert's statement as to
> >> > why he's been badgering Mickey.
> >>
> >> I saw more than one. Consistency isn't a Morein fort`e.
> >> >
> > Aw, come on, Scott. You're not a slope-head.
>
> You, just, don't, get, it, do, you, Bob.,
>
> ScottW
>
Do not say that as an interrogative. In reality, you refer to something
which you think of as fact.

As to "it", we would have to agree as to the issue under dispute. We do not.

[ScottW]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:6_OSe.111694$Ep.98400@lakeread02...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
>> > news:UTHSe.111661$Ep.105420@lakeread02...
>> >>
>> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>> > wrote
>> >> in message ...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Scottie said:
>> >> >
>> >> >> > Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a fact.
>> >> >
>> >> >> and George is rude, arrogant, and hostile.
>> >> >
>> >> > <blush>
>> >> >
>> >> > I thought you didn't like me, Scottie.
>> >>
>> >> and antisocial.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> Robert carries a grudge way too far.
>> >> >> are these reasons for expulsion campaigns?
>> >> >
>> >> > You have a strange idea of Robert's agenda. A "campaign" that
> consists
>> >> > entirely of badgering an uncouth slope-brow is pretty limited in
> scope,
>> >> > wouldn't you say?
>> >>
>> >> What else can one do on usenet. Leave it to you to advocate
>> >> going "real world".
>> >>
>> >> > I'll bet you didn't even read Robert's statement as to
>> >> > why he's been badgering Mickey.
>> >>
>> >> I saw more than one. Consistency isn't a Morein fort`e.
>> >> >
>> > Aw, come on, Scott. You're not a slope-head.
>>
>> You, just, don't, get, it, do, you, Bob.,
>>
>> ScottW
>>
> Do not say that as an interrogative.

I didn't.

> In reality, you refer to something
> which you think of as fact.
>
> As to "it", we would have to agree as to the issue under dispute. We do
> not.

What is that issue, Bob? Why is it an issue for you, Bob?

ScottW

[Robert Morein]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:a%%Se.111932$Ep.47612@lakeread02...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> > news:6_OSe.111694$Ep.98400@lakeread02...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> >> > news:UTHSe.111661$Ep.105420@lakeread02...
> >> >>
> >> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot]
net>
> >> > wrote
> >> >> in message ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Scottie said:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Robert has a point too -- Mickey is very dumb, and that's a
fact.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> and George is rude, arrogant, and hostile.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > <blush>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I thought you didn't like me, Scottie.
> >> >>
> >> >> and antisocial.
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Robert carries a grudge way too far.
> >> >> >> are these reasons for expulsion campaigns?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You have a strange idea of Robert's agenda. A "campaign" that
> > consists
> >> >> > entirely of badgering an uncouth slope-brow is pretty limited in
> > scope,
> >> >> > wouldn't you say?
> >> >>
> >> >> What else can one do on usenet. Leave it to you to advocate
> >> >> going "real world".
> >> >>
> >> >> > I'll bet you didn't even read Robert's statement as to
> >> >> > why he's been badgering Mickey.
> >> >>
> >> >> I saw more than one. Consistency isn't a Morein fort`e.
> >> >> >
> >> > Aw, come on, Scott. You're not a slope-head.
> >>
> >> You, just, don't, get, it, do, you, Bob.,
> >>
> >> ScottW
> >>
> > Do not say that as an interrogative.
>
> I didn't.
>
> > In reality, you refer to something
> > which you think of as fact.
> >
> > As to "it", we would have to agree as to the issue under dispute. We do
> > not.
>
> What is that issue, Bob? Why is it an issue for you, Bob?
>
Why is what an issue?

[[email protected]]

"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:20:17 GMT, "
> > wrote:
>
>
>>> Let me rewrite this for you. "Why? He's wrong most of the time."
>>> You have serious problems with grammar as well as spelling.
>>>
>>>
>>So do plenty of people who post here, I don't see you taking them task.
>
> Mike, despite unhelpful heckling from the onlookers, I believe Robert
> did hold out the olive branch to you. Maybe you'd better grab it
> before it turns into a sword again, sharper than before.

Ands I asked him to refresh my memory as to what he was ****ed about this
time.
He spends a lot of time ****ing on people and some more time compalining
about his past.
He also doesn't like it much when his pronouncements are challenged on
technical grounds, (even though the's very often gotten the details wrong).

IIRC he's now ****ed becuase I thought his lawsuit against Drexel was
foolish and a waste of time and money, since he was bound to lose in the
end.

I don't see why that should put me on his hound list, since it was a
foregone conclusion he would lose. Any one familiar with the grounds would
agree.

He constantly starts threads complaining about "bad science," yet has yet to
demostrate that he actually understands the process himself.

If there's a subject that he gets challenged on, and especially one where he
gets creamed on the tech details, he figures that gives him liscense to try
and hound them off the NG.

Tough ****.

His claims about not having to do a DBT because HE can listed sighted,
without any bias, is just a load of crap. So are his claims about QSC amps,
which are well built and sonically indistinguishable from other amps, as are
most pro audio amps.

He dishes out much more than is dished to him.

I ain't leavin'. Bob Morein will eventually melt down again and slouch off
and hide for a while as is his wont. I don't care what he says about me, I
don't care if likes what I say about him.

If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining factors in
intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit for.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
k.net...
>
A gang of monkeys jumping on keyboards could do better than this:

[snip refuse]
> He spends a lot of time ****ing on people and some more time compalining

Mikey, "compalining" is not a word.

Do not parenthesize this phrase: "(even though the's very often gotten the
details wrong)."

[[email protected]]

" > wrote in message
k.net...
>
> "paul packer" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:20:17 GMT, "
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Let me rewrite this for you. "Why? He's wrong most of the time."
>>>> You have serious problems with grammar as well as spelling.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>So do plenty of people who post here, I don't see you taking them task.
>>
>> Mike, despite unhelpful heckling from the onlookers, I believe Robert
>> did hold out the olive branch to you. Maybe you'd better grab it
>> before it turns into a sword again, sharper than before.
>
> And I asked him to refresh my memory as to what he was ****ed about this
> time.
> He spends a lot of time ****ing on people and some more time compalining
> about his past.
> He also doesn't like it much when his pronouncements are challenged on
> technical grounds, (even though the's very often gotten the details
> wrong).
>
> IIRC he's now ****ed becuase I thought his lawsuit against Drexel was
> foolish and a waste of time and money, since he was bound to lose in the
> end.
>
> I don't see why that should put me on his hound list, since it was a
> foregone conclusion he would lose. Anyone familiar with the grounds would
> agree.
>
> He constantly starts threads complaining about "bad science," yet has yet
> to demostrate that he actually understands the process himself.
>
> If there's a subject that he gets challenged on, and especially one where
> he gets creamed on the tech details, he figures that gives him liscense to
> try and hound them off the NG.
>
> Tough ****.
>
> His claims about not having to do a DBT because HE can listed sighted,
> without any bias, is just a load of crap. So are his claims about QSC
> amps, which are well built and sonically indistinguishable from other
> amps, as are most pro audio amps.
>
> He dishes out much more than is dished to him.
>
> I ain't leavin'. Bob Morein will eventually melt down again and slouch
> off and hide for a while as is his wont. I don't care what he says about
> me, I don't care if likes what I say about him.
>
> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining factors in
> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit for.
>

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
k.net...
>
[snip]
>
> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining factors in
> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit for.
>
No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are symptoms. It is a
sign of reduced mental capacity.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> k.net...
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining factors in
>> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit for.
>>
> No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are symptoms. It is
> a
> sign of reduced mental capacity.
>
Not really, plenty of very bright people have been atrocious spellers and
typers.
As usual, things that don't fit your jaundiced view of the world are
disregarded.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > k.net...
> >>
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining factors
in
> >> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit for.
> >>
> > No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are symptoms. It
is
> > a
> > sign of reduced mental capacity.
> >
> Not really, plenty of very bright people have been atrocious spellers and
> typers.

Mikey, you are not among them. You simply have a low IQ.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > k.net...
>> >>
>> > [snip]
>> >>
>> >> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining factors
> in
>> >> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit for.
>> >>
>> > No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are symptoms. It
> is
>> > a
>> > sign of reduced mental capacity.
>> >
>> Not really, plenty of very bright people have been atrocious spellers and
>> typers.
>
> Mikey, you are not among them. You simply have a low IQ.
>
Fragile ego alert.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > k.net...
> >> >>
> >> > [snip]
> >> >>
> >> >> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining
factors
> > in
> >> >> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit for.
> >> >>
> >> > No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are symptoms.
It
> > is
> >> > a
> >> > sign of reduced mental capacity.
> >> >
> >> Not really, plenty of very bright people have been atrocious spellers
and
> >> typers.
> >
> > Mikey, you are not among them. You simply have a low IQ.
> >
> Fragile ego alert.
>
Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for original
expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another group to
participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do not fit in
here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all the way down
to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in somewhere.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > ink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > k.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> > [snip]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining
> factors
>> > in
>> >> >> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit for.
>> >> >>
>> >> > No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are symptoms.
> It
>> > is
>> >> > a
>> >> > sign of reduced mental capacity.
>> >> >
>> >> Not really, plenty of very bright people have been atrocious spellers
> and
>> >> typers.
>> >
>> > Mikey, you are not among them. You simply have a low IQ.
>> >
>> Fragile ego alert.
>>
> Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for original
> expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another group to
> participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do not fit
> in
> here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all the way
> down
> to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in somewhere.
>
Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > ink.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> >> > k.net...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > [snip]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining
> > factors
> >> > in
> >> >> >> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit for.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are
symptoms.
> > It
> >> > is
> >> >> > a
> >> >> > sign of reduced mental capacity.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Not really, plenty of very bright people have been atrocious
spellers
> > and
> >> >> typers.
> >> >
> >> > Mikey, you are not among them. You simply have a low IQ.
> >> >
> >> Fragile ego alert.
> >>
> > Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for original
> > expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another group
to
> > participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do not
fit
> > in
> > here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all the way
> > down
> > to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in somewhere.
> >
> Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
>
Mikey, you omitted a personal pronoun in the above sentence. It should read,
"Which of the retarded groups do I frequent the most?"
Only you would know that.

[George Middius]

Congratulations are in order for the Bug Eater.

>> Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for original
>> expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another group to
>> participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do not fit
>> in here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all the way
>> down to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in somewhere.

>Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?

You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame IKYABWAIs. You are
now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg. Well done!

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > ink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > ink.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> >> > k.net...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > [snip]
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining
>> > factors
>> >> > in
>> >> >> >> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit
>> >> >> >> for.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are
> symptoms.
>> > It
>> >> > is
>> >> >> > a
>> >> >> > sign of reduced mental capacity.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Not really, plenty of very bright people have been atrocious
> spellers
>> > and
>> >> >> typers.
>> >> >
>> >> > Mikey, you are not among them. You simply have a low IQ.
>> >> >
>> >> Fragile ego alert.
>> >>
>> > Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for original
>> > expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another group
> to
>> > participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do not
> fit
>> > in
>> > here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all the way
>> > down
>> > to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in somewhere.
>> >
>> Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
>>
> Mikey, you omitted a personal pronoun in the above sentence. It should
> read,
> "Which of the retarded groups do I frequent the most?"
> Only you would know that.
>
>
How would I know which groups you frequent most?

[[email protected]]

"George Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Congratulations are in order for the Bug Eater.
>
>>> Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for original
>>> expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another group
>>> to
>>> participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do not
>>> fit
>>> in here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all the
>>> way
>>> down to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in
>>> somewhere.
>
>>Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
>
> You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame IKYABWAIs.
> You are
> now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg. Well done!
>
I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand. Given that
he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything about
science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the discussion.

I don't have the kind of time that you can devote to trying to be
disgusting.

What month should we be expecting something from you about audio?

[George Middius]

Shortage of bugs getting you down? Try using Kroopologism Elixir to attract
them. At the very least, you'll score some flies.

>> You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame IKYABWAIs.
>> You are now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg.
>> Well done!

>I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand. Given

Who told you to say "Given" when you make up random nonsense?

>he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything about
>science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the discussion.

Do you know what cognitive dissonance is? Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to you
because you seem to have zero cognitive ability.

>I don't have the kind of time that you can devote to trying to be
>disgusting.

I'm not the one who eats bugs. Or the one who saves turds for a rainy day.

>What month should we be expecting something from you about audio?

Your Proac knockoff speakers were ****. As a marketer, you're ****. You tried to
finance your silly enterprise with ****. Overall, your understanding of consumer
audio appears to be pure ****.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "George Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >
> > Congratulations are in order for the Bug Eater.
> >
> >>> Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for original
> >>> expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another group
> >>> to
> >>> participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do not
> >>> fit
> >>> in here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all the
> >>> way
> >>> down to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in
> >>> somewhere.
> >
> >>Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
> >
> > You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame IKYABWAIs.
> > You are
> > now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg. Well done!
> >
> I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand. Given
that
> he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything about
> science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the discussion.
>
Mikey, you are mentally "special". You do not belong here. Be happy with
other special people.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > ink.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> >> > ink.net...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> >> >> > k.net...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > [snip]
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining
> >> > factors
> >> >> > in
> >> >> >> >> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit
> >> >> >> >> for.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are
> > symptoms.
> >> > It
> >> >> > is
> >> >> >> > a
> >> >> >> > sign of reduced mental capacity.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Not really, plenty of very bright people have been atrocious
> > spellers
> >> > and
> >> >> >> typers.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Mikey, you are not among them. You simply have a low IQ.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Fragile ego alert.
> >> >>
> >> > Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for
original
> >> > expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another
group
> > to
> >> > participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do not
> > fit
> >> > in
> >> > here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all the
way
> >> > down
> >> > to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in
somewhere.
> >> >
> >> Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
> >>
> > Mikey, you omitted a personal pronoun in the above sentence. It should
> > read,
> > "Which of the retarded groups do I frequent the most?"
> > Only you would know that.
> >
> >
> How would I know which groups you frequent most?
>
Mikey, you have a weak mind and a low IQ. You lack the mental capacity to
contribute to this group, yet you are starkly unaware of this fact. My
advice to you is to know yourself. Understand that you were not gifted with
a strong mind. Find others to interact with who share your weakness. That is
the way of happiness for you.

[Sander deWaal]

"Robert Morein" > said:

>Mikey, you have a weak mind and a low IQ. You lack the mental capacity to
>contribute to this group, yet you are starkly unaware of this fact. My
>advice to you is to know yourself. Understand that you were not gifted with
>a strong mind. Find others to interact with who share your weakness. That is
>the way of happiness for you.


One of the signs of a weak mind might be: repeating oneself ad
nauseum. My grandmother did that when she was well in her 80s.

I might add to that: quoting entire posts of sometimes hundreds of
lines, while adding the same old message each time.

Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[George M. Middius]

Sander deWaal said:

> One of the signs of a weak mind might be: repeating oneself ad
> nauseum. My grandmother did that when she was well in her 80s.
>
> I might add to that: quoting entire posts of sometimes hundreds of
> lines, while adding the same old message each time.
>
> Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .

A little harsh, Sander. I suppose you're not directing similar advice to
Mickey because you know he's not up to the task of processing it?

[Lionel]

George Minus Middius a écrit :
>
> Sander deWaal said:
>
>
>>One of the signs of a weak mind might be: repeating oneself ad
>>nauseum. My grandmother did that when she was well in her 80s.
>>
>>I might add to that: quoting entire posts of sometimes hundreds of
>>lines, while adding the same old message each time.
>>
>>Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .
>
>
> A little harsh, Sander. I suppose you're not directing similar advice to
> Mickey because you know he's not up to the task of processing it?

You too George, surely not for the same reasons but you too...

[Lionel]

Sander deWaal a écrit :

Sander what about your DIY speaker project ?
Finish ? Pictures somewhere ?

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > ink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > ink.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> >> > ink.net...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > k.net...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > [snip]
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> If he thinks spelling, typing and grammar are the determining
>> >> > factors
>> >> >> > in
>> >> >> >> >> intelligence, then he's a dumber **** than I gave him credit
>> >> >> >> >> for.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > No, Mikey, they are not the determining factors. They are
>> > symptoms.
>> >> > It
>> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> > a
>> >> >> >> > sign of reduced mental capacity.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Not really, plenty of very bright people have been atrocious
>> > spellers
>> >> > and
>> >> >> >> typers.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Mikey, you are not among them. You simply have a low IQ.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Fragile ego alert.
>> >> >>
>> >> > Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for
> original
>> >> > expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another
> group
>> > to
>> >> > participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do
>> >> > not
>> > fit
>> >> > in
>> >> > here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all the
> way
>> >> > down
>> >> > to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in
> somewhere.
>> >> >
>> >> Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
>> >>
>> > Mikey, you omitted a personal pronoun in the above sentence. It should
>> > read,
>> > "Which of the retarded groups do I frequent the most?"
>> > Only you would know that.
>> >
>> >
>> How would I know which groups you frequent most?
>>
> Mikey, you have a weak mind and a low IQ. You lack the mental capacity to
> contribute to this group, yet you are starkly unaware of this fact. My
> advice to you is to know yourself. Understand that you were not gifted
> with
> a strong mind. Find others to interact with who share your weakness. That
> is
> the way of happiness for you.
>
>
My advice to you is find someone who cares what you think.

[[email protected]]

"George Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Shortage of bugs getting you down? Try using Kroopologism Elixir to
> attract
> them. At the very least, you'll score some flies.
>
>>> You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame IKYABWAIs.
>>> You are now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg.
>>> Well done!
>
>>I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand. Given
>
> Who told you to say "Given" when you make up random nonsense?
>
>>he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything about
>>science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the discussion.
>
> Do you know what cognitive dissonance is? Unfortunately, it doesn't apply
> to you
> because you seem to have zero cognitive ability.
>
>>I don't have the kind of time that you can devote to trying to be
>>disgusting.
>
> I'm not the one who eats bugs.

No, you eat ****.

Or the one who saves turds for a rainy day.
>

Aw, cmon George, there's not just a couple dingle berries in your pantry?

>>What month should we be expecting something from you about audio?
>
> Your Proac knockoff speakers were ****.

Confusing your dinner with speakers you never heard, is a sign that you are
losing what ever slight hold you had.

As a marketer, you're ****. You tried to
> finance your silly enterprise with ****. Overall, your understanding of
> consumer
> audio appears to be pure ****.
>
I can at least say I've made money in the business.

Thanks for more proof that you know less about audio than a rock.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "George Middius" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> >
>> > Congratulations are in order for the Bug Eater.
>> >
>> >>> Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for
>> >>> original
>> >>> expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another
>> >>> group
>> >>> to
>> >>> participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do not
>> >>> fit
>> >>> in here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all
>> >>> the
>> >>> way
>> >>> down to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in
>> >>> somewhere.
>> >
>> >>Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
>> >
>> > You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame
>> > IKYABWAIs.
>> > You are
>> > now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg. Well done!
>> >
>> I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand. Given
> that
>> he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything about
>> science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the discussion.
>>
> Mikey, you are mentally "special". You do not belong here. Be happy with
> other special people.
>
>
Thanks for demonstrating your insanity by repeating the same statements and
expecting a different result.

[Robert Morein]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> "Robert Morein" > said:
>
> >Mikey, you have a weak mind and a low IQ. You lack the mental capacity to
> >contribute to this group, yet you are starkly unaware of this fact. My
> >advice to you is to know yourself. Understand that you were not gifted
with
> >a strong mind. Find others to interact with who share your weakness. That
is
> >the way of happiness for you.
>
>
> One of the signs of a weak mind might be: repeating oneself ad
> nauseum. My grandmother did that when she was well in her 80s.
>
> I might add to that: quoting entire posts of sometimes hundreds of
> lines, while adding the same old message each time.
>
> Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .
>
I apologize, Sander. Brainwashing is a tedious process. I certainly didn't
expect you to read this. The only individual captivated by this is the
individual being programmed.

The actual content is derived from a technique of Arny Krueger. He showed a
theoretical model by which an individual could actually be disenfranchised
from usenet, by claiming that only those who used his "ABX" contraption were
entitled to offer their observations.

Mikey has an extremely weak mind; otherwise, he would have fled the
conditioning chamber long ago.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >>
> >> "George Middius" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Congratulations are in order for the Bug Eater.
> >> >
> >> >>> Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for
> >> >>> original
> >> >>> expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another
> >> >>> group
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do
not
> >> >>> fit
> >> >>> in here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> way
> >> >>> down to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in
> >> >>> somewhere.
> >> >
> >> >>Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
> >> >
> >> > You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame
> >> > IKYABWAIs.
> >> > You are
> >> > now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg. Well
done!
> >> >
> >> I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand. Given
> > that
> >> he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything about
> >> science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the discussion.
> >>
> > Mikey, you are mentally "special". You do not belong here. Be happy with
> > other special people.
> >
> >
> Thanks for demonstrating your insanity by repeating the same statements
and
> expecting a different result.
>
Mikey, you've just plagiarized Arny again. If you wish to show us that you
actually are an intelligent person, try to create posts with your own
personal style.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "George Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >
> > Shortage of bugs getting you down? Try using Kroopologism Elixir to
> > attract
> > them. At the very least, you'll score some flies.
> >
> >>> You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame
IKYABWAIs.
> >>> You are now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg.
> >>> Well done!
> >
> >>I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand. Given
> >
> > Who told you to say "Given" when you make up random nonsense?
> >
> >>he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything about
> >>science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the discussion.
> >
> > Do you know what cognitive dissonance is? Unfortunately, it doesn't
apply
> > to you
> > because you seem to have zero cognitive ability.
> >
> >>I don't have the kind of time that you can devote to trying to be
> >>disgusting.
> >
> > I'm not the one who eats bugs.
>
> No, you eat ****.
>
> Or the one who saves turds for a rainy day.
> >
>
> Aw, cmon George, there's not just a couple dingle berries in your pantry?
>
> >>What month should we be expecting something from you about audio?
> >
> > Your Proac knockoff speakers were ****.
>
> Confusing your dinner with speakers you never heard, is a sign that you
are
> losing what ever slight hold you had.
>
> As a marketer, you're ****. You tried to
> > finance your silly enterprise with ****. Overall, your understanding of
> > consumer
> > audio appears to be pure ****.
> >
> I can at least say I've made money in the business.
>
> Thanks for more proof that you know less about audio than a rock.
>
Mikey, you are continuing to plagiarize Arny. Bad boy, Mikey.

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
[snip]> >>
> > Mikey, you have a weak mind and a low IQ. You lack the mental capacity
to
> > contribute to this group, yet you are starkly unaware of this fact. My
> > advice to you is to know yourself. Understand that you were not gifted
> > with
> > a strong mind. Find others to interact with who share your weakness.
That
> > is
> > the way of happiness for you.
> >
> >
> My advice to you is find someone who cares what you think.
>
Mikey, I DO care about you. You are a mental child among adults. You do not
belong here.

[Sander deWaal]

George M. Middius said:
>Sander deWaal said:

>> One of the signs of a weak mind might be: repeating oneself ad
>> nauseum. My grandmother did that when she was well in her 80s.

>> I might add to that: quoting entire posts of sometimes hundreds of
>> lines, while adding the same old message each time.

>> Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .

>A little harsh, Sander. I suppose you're not directing similar advice to
>Mickey because you know he's not up to the task of processing it?


The reason I'm not replying to Mike is that Mike doesn't tell others
they don't belong on usenet because of their presumed low
intelligence.

I was trying to be polite!

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[ScottW]

Sander deWaal wrote:
> George M. Middius said:
> >Sander deWaal said:
>
> >> One of the signs of a weak mind might be: repeating oneself ad
> >> nauseum. My grandmother did that when she was well in her 80s.
>
> >> I might add to that: quoting entire posts of sometimes hundreds of
> >> lines, while adding the same old message each time.
>
> >> Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .
>
> >A little harsh, Sander. I suppose you're not directing similar advice to
> >Mickey because you know he's not up to the task of processing it?
>
>
> The reason I'm not replying to Mike is that Mike doesn't tell others
> they don't belong on usenet because of their presumed low
> intelligence.
>
> I was trying to be polite!

Very well said, Sander. I knew you were a standup guy.

ScottW

[George Middius]

Sander deWaal said:

>>> Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .
>
>>A little harsh, Sander. I suppose you're not directing similar advice to
>>Mickey because you know he's not up to the task of processing it?

>The reason I'm not replying to Mike is that Mike doesn't tell others
>they don't belong on usenet because of their presumed low
>intelligence.

You mean that offends you even though it's directed at duh-Mikey?

>I was trying to be polite!

I don't thing the Bug Eater deserves politeness. I find his persistent stupidity
to be annoying and tiresome. His Kroopologism is wrongheaded, obnoxious, and
immoral. His political views are dangerous, or they would be if anybody took him
seriously. He contributes nothing of value to this group, and in fact he demeans
it even further than if we just had Krooger and a few lesser 'borgs.

Are you a Vegan? Do you believe that even the lowest life forms are "sentient"?

[Sander deWaal]

George Middius > said:


>Sander deWaal said:

>>The reason I'm not replying to Mike is that Mike doesn't tell others
>>they don't belong on usenet because of their presumed low
>>intelligence.

>You mean that offends you even though it's directed at duh-Mikey?


I find that insulting, regardless to whom it is said.


>>I was trying to be polite!

>I don't thing the Bug Eater deserves politeness. I find his persistent stupidity
>to be annoying and tiresome. His Kroopologism is wrongheaded, obnoxious, and
>immoral. His political views are dangerous, or they would be if anybody took him
>seriously. He contributes nothing of value to this group, and in fact he demeans
>it even further than if we just had Krooger and a few lesser 'borgs.


Well, I've said this before, and I'll say it again:
I have had a good e-mail contact with Mike, and I know a little bit
more about the person behind the posts.
I could easily say the same about *you*, George :-)


>Are you a Vegan? Do you believe that even the lowest life forms are "sentient"?


Don't be ridicilous.
One could argue (some do) that cats are not sentient beings, you and I
both know better.

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[Lionel]

George Middius a écrit :

> I find his persistent stupidity
> to be annoying and tiresome.

George we will never if in fact you are as intelligent as
you pretend to be. Seems to RAO readers that intelligence is
the only thing that you can arrogate and that you are
pathetically trying to sell it just like a starlet tries to
sell her ass at a casting.
What a pity.

[George Middius]

Anger roils the Hive.

>> I find his persistent stupidity
>> to be annoying and tiresome.

>George we will never if in fact you are as intelligent as
>you pretend to be. Seems to RAO readers that intelligence is
>the only thing that you can arrogate and that you are
>pathetically trying to sell it just like a starlet tries to
>sell her ass at a casting.
>What a pity.

"I don't know who 'Krooborg' is." -- Gibberella, Sept. 2005


I admit that stupidity annoys me. I don't mind class-based snobbery; I can
easily ignore that. Another thing that irritates me is otherwise rational people
enabling and apologizing for toxic personalities, especially in the case of
individuals who refuse to heed plain expositions of logic.

BTW, the notion of pretending to be intelligent is quite idiotic. I'd say it's
so supernally stupid that it's worthy of Mikey Bug Eater.

[George M. Middius]

Sander deWaal said:

> >You mean that offends you even though it's directed at duh-Mikey?

> I find that insulting, regardless to whom it is said.

I believe it's supposed to be insulting. Robert originally cast this
series of insults as a retaliation for Mickey's gratuitous digging about
Robert's lost lawsuit. Do you think one kind of mean-spiritedness is worse
than the other?

> >>I was trying to be polite!
>
> >I don't thing the Bug Eater deserves politeness. I find his persistent stupidity
> >to be annoying and tiresome. His Kroopologism is wrongheaded, obnoxious, and
> >immoral. His political views are dangerous, or they would be if anybody took him
> >seriously. He contributes nothing of value to this group, and in fact he demeans
> >it even further than if we just had Krooger and a few lesser 'borgs.

> Well, I've said this before, and I'll say it again:
> I have had a good e-mail contact with Mike, and I know a little bit
> more about the person behind the posts.
> I could easily say the same about *you*, George :-)

True. In fact many have done just that. :-) But rare is the post that
attacks attacks on me, because everybody can see I invite them. It's my
view that Mickey invites such attacks as Robert has given, and also as I
have given. Do you disagree?

> >Are you a Vegan? Do you believe that even the lowest life forms are "sentient"?

> Don't be ridicilous.
> One could argue (some do) that cats are not sentient beings, you and I
> both know better.

Well, cats are of course an exception to any generalization about "dumb
animals". :-)

In America, the debate about affirmative action led to a divide in the
black community. Some activitists condemned welfare and similar programs
for obviating the urgency for society's less privileged members to take
responsibility for their own well-being. They labeled this type of
indulgence infantilization of black men. Seems to me that by going to this
length to protect Mickey from the results of his ineptitude, you and
Scottie are doing something similar.

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > ink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "George Middius" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Congratulations are in order for the Bug Eater.
>> >> >
>> >> >>> Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for
>> >> >>> original
>> >> >>> expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another
>> >> >>> group
>> >> >>> to
>> >> >>> participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you do
> not
>> >> >>> fit
>> >> >>> in here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging all
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> way
>> >> >>> down to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit in
>> >> >>> somewhere.
>> >> >
>> >> >>Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
>> >> >
>> >> > You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame
>> >> > IKYABWAIs.
>> >> > You are
>> >> > now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg. Well
> done!
>> >> >
>> >> I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand. Given
>> > that
>> >> he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything about
>> >> science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the discussion.
>> >>
>> > Mikey, you are mentally "special". You do not belong here. Be happy
>> > with
>> > other special people.
>> >
>> >
>> Thanks for demonstrating your insanity by repeating the same statements
> and
>> expecting a different result.
>>
> Mikey, you've just plagiarized Arny again. If you wish to show us that you
> actually are an intelligent person, try to create posts with your own
> personal style.
>
>
If you wish to show us you're not a petulant fool, shut up already.

[Sander deWaal]

George M. Middius said:


>Sander deWaal said:

>> >You mean that offends you even though it's directed at duh-Mikey?

>> I find that insulting, regardless to whom it is said.

>I believe it's supposed to be insulting. Robert originally cast this
>series of insults as a retaliation for Mickey's gratuitous digging about
>Robert's lost lawsuit. Do you think one kind of mean-spiritedness is worse
>than the other?


I must admit to not reading every RAO post anymore, especially when
they're . 200 lines long.
So, my copout is that I haven't seen Mike writing about that.
I *have * seen Arny doing that, however. Does that count? :-)

But really, it is true that mean-spirited posting generates likewise
responses.
However, I thought better of Robert than what he is doing now.

And to be brutally honest, I thought better of Mike as well.
He shouldn't respond to such trolling.

And mean-spiritedness comes in gradations, I think.


>> Well, I've said this before, and I'll say it again:
>> I have had a good e-mail contact with Mike, and I know a little bit
>> more about the person behind the posts.
>> I could easily say the same about *you*, George :-)

>True. In fact many have done just that. :-) But rare is the post that
>attacks attacks on me, because everybody can see I invite them. It's my
>view that Mickey invites such attacks as Robert has given, and also as I
>have given. Do you disagree?


I don't disagree, but I don't agree either.
I just try to look at things from a distance, and some things I see
are "not a pretty sight" ©.

Let's say that each and every person has to live with how he acts and
what he writes.


>In America, the debate about affirmative action led to a divide in the
>black community. Some activitists condemned welfare and similar programs
>for obviating the urgency for society's less privileged members to take
>responsibility for their own well-being. They labeled this type of
>indulgence infantilization of black men. Seems to me that by going to this
>length to protect Mickey from the results of his ineptitude, you and
>Scottie are doing something similar.


Probably.
I wouldn't call it "trying to protect Mike", however.
I think he's capable enough to defend himself.

I just raise my voice when I don't agree with what is said.
Sometimes I agree with Scott, sometimes with you, sometimes with
Lionel and many others.
And perhaps in even more cases, I just shake my head and say nothing.

I have the same problem with politics, we have many parties here in
Holland, and I agree with most of them about some issues.
What did they call that again? The lesser of two evils? :-)

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[ScottW]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius said:
>
>
> Probably.
> I wouldn't call it "trying to protect Mike", however.
> I think he's capable enough to defend himself.

Agreed, my problem isn't with Morein relentlessly going
after him... although I find it tedious.

It's when he states he is in position to judge intellect and
establish criteria for posting here. I know he's FOS,
but that whole premise just sucks.

BTW... the intellectual level on RAO isn't all that and the
number of participants continues to dwindle.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Yapper said:

> Agreed, my problem isn't with Morein relentlessly going
> after him... although I find it tedious.
>
> It's when he states he is in position to judge intellect and
> establish criteria for posting here. I know he's FOS,
> but that whole premise just sucks.

Everybody calls everybody else an idiot or stupid or a retard all the damn
time. Especially you, but at any rate it's very common on RAO.

> BTW... the intellectual level on RAO isn't all that and the
> number of participants continues to dwindle.

Have you met Giberella?

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Yapper said:
>
>> Agreed, my problem isn't with Morein relentlessly going
>> after him... although I find it tedious.
>>
>> It's when he states he is in position to judge intellect and
>> establish criteria for posting here. I know he's FOS,
>> but that whole premise just sucks.
>
> Everybody calls everybody else an idiot or stupid or a retard all the damn
> time. Especially you, but at any rate it's very common on RAO.

But they don't tell them they don't have a right to be here.

>
>> BTW... the intellectual level on RAO isn't all that and the
>> number of participants continues to dwindle.
>
> Have you met Giberella?

I rest my case.

ScottW

[Lionel]

George Minus Middius a écrit :

> Anger roils the Hive.

Anger ?
Are you sure you really understood me ?

>>>I find his persistent stupidity
>>>to be annoying and tiresome.
>
>
>>George we will never if in fact you are as intelligent as
>>you pretend to be. Seems to RAO readers that intelligence is
>>the only thing that you can arrogate and that you are
>>pathetically trying to sell it just like a starlet tries to
>>sell her ass at a casting.
>>What a pity.
>
>
> "I don't know who 'Krooborg' is." -- Gibberella, Sept. 2005



> I admit that stupidity annoys me. I don't mind class-based snobbery; I can
> easily ignore that. Another thing that irritates me is otherwise rational people
> enabling and apologizing for toxic personalities, especially in the case of
> individuals who refuse to heed plain expositions of logic.

Logic ? I see, a least, 3 contradictions in the about paragraph.
BTW logic isn't applicable to human life, only a Krooborg
would try such stupid experience.

NB : now you can amend the above quote, finally I know a
"Krooborg".

> BTW, the notion of pretending to be intelligent is quite idiotic.

....but this is the base of *all* your RAO discourse.
But you are right, you're just a skillful hypocrite. ;-)

> I'd say it's
> so supernally stupid that it's worthy of Mikey Bug Eater.

Yeah, yeah...

[George M. Middius]

Sander deWaal said:

> >Robert originally cast this series of insults as a retaliation for Mickey's
> >gratuitous digging about Robert's lost lawsuit.

> I must admit to not reading every RAO post anymore, especially when
> they're . 200 lines long.

I agree -- both Bob and Mickey should trim their posts.

> >Do you think one kind of mean-spiritedness is worse
> >than the other?

> So, my copout is that I haven't seen Mike writing about that.
> I *have * seen Arny doing that, however. Does that count? :-)

Sure. If Mickey says something, it's a certainty Arnii already said it at
least three times before. So if you see Arnii saying it, odds are Mickey
will ape him in the future. :-)

> But really, it is true that mean-spirited posting generates likewise
> responses.
> However, I thought better of Robert than what he is doing now.

I know what you mean. I advise people not to engage the Bug Eater, and not
just because of the stupidity thing. Mickey also tries to emulate Arnii's
"debating trade" shtick insofar as never admitting error. It's nearly
impossible to have a discussion with him and not get sucked into the
hair-splitting and doubletalk.

> And to be brutally honest, I thought better of Mike as well.
> He shouldn't respond to such trolling.

You're overestimating him. He's not bright enough to distinguish trolling
from sincerity. Case in point -- look at his political views.

> And mean-spiritedness comes in gradations, I think.

Oh, definitely. I agree that Mickey seems generally enraged rather than
hostil, but his inability to understand how others perceive him inteferes
with his ability to mollify his demeanor.

> >It's my view that Mickey invites such attacks as Robert has given,
> >and also as I have given. Do you disagree?

> I don't disagree, but I don't agree either.
> I just try to look at things from a distance, and some things I see
> are "not a pretty sight" ©.

I understand, but in this case, you're taking a stand.

> Let's say that each and every person has to live with how he acts and
> what he writes.

That's good, but when some of us appear to have no inhibitions and no
conscience, the moral value is pretty much null.

> >Seems to me that by going to this length to protect Mickey from the results
> >of his ineptitude, you and Scottie are doing something similar.

> Probably.
> I wouldn't call it "trying to protect Mike", however.
> I think he's capable enough to defend himself.

If you're not speaking out on behalf of Mickey, then why bother? I'm sure
Robert is aware that he's descending to a new low.

> I have the same problem with politics, we have many parties here in
> Holland, and I agree with most of them about some issues.
> What did they call that again? The lesser of two evils? :-)

Mickey would be the lesser evil only in some very disgusting company.

[George M. Middius]

Scottie said:

> > Everybody calls everybody else an idiot or stupid or a retard all the damn
> > time. Especially you, but at any rate it's very common on RAO.

> But they don't tell them they don't have a right to be here.

It's just talk, Scottie. Get over it.

> >> BTW... the intellectual level on RAO isn't all that and the
> >> number of participants continues to dwindle.

> > Have you met Giberella?

> I rest my case.

By accepting my point? Whatever........

[Robert Morein]

" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > ink.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "George Middius" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Congratulations are in order for the Bug Eater.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for
> >> >> >>> original
> >> >> >>> expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find another
> >> >> >>> group
> >> >> >>> to
> >> >> >>> participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you
do
> > not
> >> >> >>> fit
> >> >> >>> in here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging
all
> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >>> way
> >> >> >>> down to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit
in
> >> >> >>> somewhere.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame
> >> >> > IKYABWAIs.
> >> >> > You are
> >> >> > now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg. Well
> > done!
> >> >> >
> >> >> I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand.
Given
> >> > that
> >> >> he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything about
> >> >> science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the
discussion.
> >> >>
> >> > Mikey, you are mentally "special". You do not belong here. Be happy
> >> > with
> >> > other special people.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Thanks for demonstrating your insanity by repeating the same statements
> > and
> >> expecting a different result.
> >>
> > Mikey, you've just plagiarized Arny again. If you wish to show us that
you
> > actually are an intelligent person, try to create posts with your own
> > personal style.
> >
> >
> If you wish to show us you're not a petulant fool, shut up already.
>
Mikey, it's time for you to find new friends to play with. You have quite a
choice. Half the world is "dumb". It's against nature for you to try to hang
with the other half.

[Sander deWaal]

George M. Middius said:


>If you're not speaking out on behalf of Mickey, then why bother? I'm sure
>Robert is aware that he's descending to a new low.


Like I said, Robert's the one who has to live with that.

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > ink.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > ink.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "George Middius" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Congratulations are in order for the Bug Eater.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> Mikey, you are plagiarizing Arny Krueger. This is a place for
>> >> >> >>> original
>> >> >> >>> expression. If you are not smart enough to do this, find
>> >> >> >>> another
>> >> >> >>> group
>> >> >> >>> to
>> >> >> >>> participate in with a similar intellectual level. Although you
> do
>> > not
>> >> >> >>> fit
>> >> >> >>> in here, there are groups for people of all abilities, ranging
> all
>> >> >> >>> the
>> >> >> >>> way
>> >> >> >>> down to the level of severe retardation. I am sure you can fit
> in
>> >> >> >>> somewhere.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>Which of the retarded groups do frequent the most?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You've done it, Mickey. You've surpassed the Krooborg in lame
>> >> >> > IKYABWAIs.
>> >> >> > You are
>> >> >> > now the unofficial holder of the exalted title IKYABWAIBorg. Well
>> > done!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> I'm simply responding to Bob in the way he seems to understand.
> Given
>> >> > that
>> >> >> he can't answer any audio questions, and doesn't know anything
>> >> >> about
>> >> >> science, there really is no point in trying to elevate the
> discussion.
>> >> >>
>> >> > Mikey, you are mentally "special". You do not belong here. Be happy
>> >> > with
>> >> > other special people.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Thanks for demonstrating your insanity by repeating the same
>> >> statements
>> > and
>> >> expecting a different result.
>> >>
>> > Mikey, you've just plagiarized Arny again. If you wish to show us that
> you
>> > actually are an intelligent person, try to create posts with your own
>> > personal style.
>> >
>> >
>> If you wish to show us you're not a petulant fool, shut up already.
>>
> Mikey, it's time for you to find new friends to play with. You have quite
> a
> choice. Half the world is "dumb". It's against nature for you to try to
> hang
> with the other half.
>
Defending your fellow dummies, how cute.

[Robert Morein]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius said:
>
>
> >If you're not speaking out on behalf of Mickey, then why bother? I'm sure
> >Robert is aware that he's descending to a new low.
>
>
> Like I said, Robert's the one who has to live with that.
>
I wouldn't worry about Mikey too much. Every Friday night, he hits the keg
pretty hard, and has no memory therafter of the week before.

He's a bit like one of the Three Stooges. They get poked in the eyes, or hit
over the head with a frying pan, and all that happens is a little steam
comes out of their ears.

[Robert Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Sander deWaal a écrit :
>
> Sander what about your DIY speaker project ?
> Finish ? Pictures somewhere ?

He is too busy shoring up the dikes, after looking at New Orleans.
BTW, Lionel, I finally join the anti-Bush club, and for a purely practical
reason.

[Sander deWaal]

"Robert Morein" > said:

>> >If you're not speaking out on behalf of Mickey, then why bother? I'm sure
>> >Robert is aware that he's descending to a new low.


>> Like I said, Robert's the one who has to live with that.

>I wouldn't worry about Mikey too much. Every Friday night, he hits the keg
>pretty hard, and has no memory therafter of the week before.


This isn't about Mike, it's about *you*.

And as far as Mike is concerned, I know he's suffering from severe
pains.
I happen to live with someone who's in severe pain herself, so I know
how that can affect one's life, let alone one's writing skills.

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[[email protected]]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Sander deWaal wrote:
>> George M. Middius said:
>> >Sander deWaal said:
>>
>> >> One of the signs of a weak mind might be: repeating oneself ad
>> >> nauseum. My grandmother did that when she was well in her 80s.
>>
>> >> I might add to that: quoting entire posts of sometimes hundreds of
>> >> lines, while adding the same old message each time.
>>
>> >> Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .
>>
>> >A little harsh, Sander. I suppose you're not directing similar advice to
>> >Mickey because you know he's not up to the task of processing it?
>>
>>
>> The reason I'm not replying to Mike is that Mike doesn't tell others
>> they don't belong on usenet because of their presumed low
>> intelligence.
>>
>> I was trying to be polite!
>
> Very well said, Sander. I knew you were a standup guy.
>
> ScottW
>
That fact has been obvious for a very long time.

[[email protected]]

"George Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Sander deWaal said:
>
>>>> Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .
>>
>>>A little harsh, Sander. I suppose you're not directing similar advice to
>>>Mickey because you know he's not up to the task of processing it?
>
>>The reason I'm not replying to Mike is that Mike doesn't tell others
>>they don't belong on usenet because of their presumed low
>>intelligence.
>
> You mean that offends you even though it's directed at duh-Mikey?
>
>>I was trying to be polite!
>
> I don't thing the Bug Eater deserves politeness.

Which could be equally true for you George, not that you've ever been
confused with a person possessed of good manners.

I find his persistent stupidity
> to be annoying and tiresome.

Then put me in a killfile.

His Kroopologism is wrongheaded, obnoxious, and
> immoral.

An opinion you get to have.

I find your constant derision and vitriol to be the same.
Not to mention how ineffectual it is.

His political views are dangerous, or they would be if anybody took him
> seriously.

Perhaps you should check how many registered Libertarians there are.
What's dangerous about allowing Gays to marry, or legalizing things like pot
and heroin? Is it dangerous to allow people to keep more of what they earn?
Or is it the fact that I believe property tax is a direct assault on
personal freedom? Yeah, righ, very dangerous indeed to those who want to
control people.

He contributes nothing of value to this group, and in fact he demeans
> it even further than if we just had Krooger and a few lesser 'borgs.
>
What is your contribution to the discussion of audio on this or any other
NG?

[[email protected]]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Robert Morein" > said:
>>
>> >Mikey, you have a weak mind and a low IQ. You lack the mental capacity
>> >to
>> >contribute to this group, yet you are starkly unaware of this fact. My
>> >advice to you is to know yourself. Understand that you were not gifted
> with
>> >a strong mind. Find others to interact with who share your weakness.
>> >That
> is
>> >the way of happiness for you.
>>
>>
>> One of the signs of a weak mind might be: repeating oneself ad
>> nauseum. My grandmother did that when she was well in her 80s.
>>
>> I might add to that: quoting entire posts of sometimes hundreds of
>> lines, while adding the same old message each time.
>>
>> Give it a rest, Bob, you're being immensely boring and annoying .
>>
> I apologize, Sander. Brainwashing is a tedious process. I certainly didn't
> expect you to read this. The only individual captivated by this is the
> individual being programmed.
>
> The actual content is derived from a technique of Arny Krueger. He showed
> a
> theoretical model by which an individual could actually be disenfranchised
> from usenet, by claiming that only those who used his "ABX" contraption
> were
> entitled to offer their observations.
>
> Mikey has an extremely weak mind; otherwise, he would have fled the
> conditioning chamber long ago.
>
So, I was correct, you have no clue.

You know nothing about me Bob, nothing at all.

[surf]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote

> This isn't about Mike, it's about *you*.
>
> And as far as Mike is concerned, I know he's suffering from severe
> pains.
> I happen to live with someone who's in severe pain herself, so I know
> how that can affect one's life, let alone one's writing skills.


Are we supposed to treat Mike differently because he has pain?
Bob's treatment of Mike is not very different from most of what
goes on here.

I didn't see you raise an objection when torresists posted my
wife's cell phone number here. Which is worse?

[Sander deWaal]

"surf" > said:

>> This isn't about Mike, it's about *you*.

>> And as far as Mike is concerned, I know he's suffering from severe
>> pains.
>> I happen to live with someone who's in severe pain herself, so I know
>> how that can affect one's life, let alone one's writing skills.


>Are we supposed to treat Mike differently because he has pain?


That's up to you.
It could be an explanation for the typos he makes, however.
To blame someone's IQ for that, is simply absurd, and it says more
about the one making the accusation then it does about the subject.


>Bob's treatment of Mike is not very different from most of what
>goes on here.


Probably not, but so far, I haven't seen others making calls to leave
this group because of "not belonging among his betters".
Not even Arny got that treatment (as far as I know).


>I didn't see you raise an objection when torresists posted my
>wife's cell phone number here. Which is worse?


I don't condone that either.
However, we all have our history on RAO, but so far, I haven't seen
Bob Morein doing things like that.
And it's not like some contest of who gets to be the nastiest among
RAO regulars.

If you think so, you might have a problem :-)

I don't always comment on bad behaviour, as I said earlier.
In your case, I probably shook my head and went on.
In fact, I can't even remember seeing such a post.

BTW how did Tor get that number, anyway?

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[ScottW]

George Middius wrote:
> Sander deWaal said:
>
>
> I think Robert's comments are qualitatively equivalent to the various other
> insults that are tossed around RAO. Scottie's inference that Robert is literally
> trying to rid RAO of the duh-ster is absurd.


That isn't what Robert says... literally.

But accepting that he isn't...how many people have left RAO because of
Roberts kind of BS? This place is pathetically void of participants
compared to five years ago and it was pretty pathetic back then.

This is exactly what happens when leaving this kind of ridicule game
mentality unchecked. Sooner or later only the players remain and they
don't really have anything interesting to say to each other.

ScottW

[George Middius]

Scottie said:

>> I think Robert's comments are qualitatively equivalent to the various other
>> insults that are tossed around RAO. Scottie's inference that Robert is
>> literally trying to rid RAO of the duh-ster is absurd.

> That isn't what Robert says... literally.

Is too.

> But accepting that he isn't...how many people have left RAO because of
>Roberts kind of BS? This place is pathetically void of participants
>compared to five years ago and it was pretty pathetic back then.

The alternative in dealing with duh-Mikey is just to ignore him. Robert usually
does that, but in this case, Mickey picked a fight, and now Robert is hitting
back.

The notion that Robert's taunting differs in kind from others on RAO is
mistaken.

[ScottW]

George Middius wrote:
> Scottie said:
>
> >> I think Robert's comments are qualitatively equivalent to the various other
> >> insults that are tossed around RAO. Scottie's inference that Robert is
> >> literally trying to rid RAO of the duh-ster is absurd.
>
> > That isn't what Robert says... literally.
>
> Is too.

Come on George, Is reality that big a challenge? How many posts has
Robert literally told Mike he shouldn't be posting here?


>
> > But accepting that he isn't...how many people have left RAO because of
> >Roberts kind of BS? This place is pathetically void of participants
> >compared to five years ago and it was pretty pathetic back then.
>
> The alternative in dealing with duh-Mikey is just to ignore him. Robert usually
> does that, but in this case, Mickey picked a fight, and now Robert is hitting
> back.

Like a bare knuckle fight between two exhausted over age out of shape
heavyweights they're just leaning on each other with no prospects for a
knockout in our lifetime.

>
> The notion that Robert's taunting differs in kind from others on RAO is
> mistaken.

Literally it does differ. But the whole taunting and ridicule thing
is getting more than a bit old across the board.

ScottW

[Sander deWaal]

George Middius > said:

>I think you're taking Robert's taunting too literally.


Let's hope so.


>>Not even Arny got that treatment (as far as I know).


>Some of us have encouraged Turdborg to commit suicide. Have you forgotten that?


Oops.....Indeed I forgot about that.
Alzheimer's kicks in early this year.


>I think Robert's comments are qualitatively equivalent to the various other
>insults that are tossed around RAO. Scottie's inference that Robert is literally
>trying to rid RAO of the duh-ster is absurd. I don't see a meaningful difference
>between Robert's taunting and others like "you're an idiot" or "what a maroon".
>It's just Robert's way of intensifying the insult for emphasis.


And maybe Robert's way just seemed different from the usual RAO
rantings to me.


>This is what it's really about for you, right? You had an image of Robert as
>somehow above the commonplace name-calling, and now that image is tarnished.


Indeed. So now that we have brought this back to being *my* problem,
remind me to call my therapist first thing in the morning!


>Your attitude toward Mickey is implicitly similar to what Stephen just stated
>explicitly about Scottie.


I haven't followed that discussion, to be honest.

Let's just say I have a weak spot for Mike, just as I have one for
you. :-)

--

"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005

[surf]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote

>surf wrote;
>>
>>I didn't see you raise an objection when torresists posted my
>>wife's cell phone number here. Which is worse?
>
> I don't condone that either.
> I don't always comment on bad behaviour, as I said earlier.
> In your case, I probably shook my head and went on.
> BTW how did Tor get that number, anyway?

He knows who I am. He did a Google search.

A couple years ago, he posted a forgery from my wife asking
people to call her. People did. Can you imagine? This says
to me, "I hate you! You always get the best of me in a fair fight,
so I'm going to behave like a terrorist and you can't do
anything about it!"

[Clyde Slick]

"George Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Some of us have encouraged Turdborg to commit suicide. Have you forgotten
> that?
>

yes, and it was unfortunate you repeatedly made
such a suggestion. Really, it
was quite unfair to the bus.

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> > Some of us have encouraged Turdborg to commit suicide. Have you forgotten
> > that?

> yes, and it was unfortunate you repeatedly made
> such a suggestion. Really, it
> was quite unfair to the bus.

Now do Lake Superior.

[[email protected]]

"surf" > wrote in message
...
> "Sander deWaal" > wrote
>
>> This isn't about Mike, it's about *you*.
>>
>> And as far as Mike is concerned, I know he's suffering from severe
>> pains.
>> I happen to live with someone who's in severe pain herself, so I know
>> how that can affect one's life, let alone one's writing skills.
>
>
> Are we supposed to treat Mike differently because he has pain?
> Bob's treatment of Mike is not very different from most of what
> goes on here.
>
I'm not asking Bob to leave. Aside from being childish, it's pointless.

> I didn't see you raise an objection when torresists posted my
> wife's cell phone number here. Which is worse?
Don't **** Bob off, he's exactly the kind of guy who would use such info to
harrass you. Notice how torresists doesn't get much in the way of response.
IMO he's over the top with respect to you, but just as you are with Arny.

I talk nice to people who talk nice. Bob's not nice. He's also dead wrong
a lot.

[George Middius]

The Bug Eater begs for attention.

>Don't **** Bob off, he's exactly the kind of guy who would use such info to
>harrass you.

Let's test that theory.

http://urlsnip.com/693363

[ScottW]

George Middius wrote:
> The Bug Eater begs for attention.
>
> >Don't **** Bob off, he's exactly the kind of guy who would use such info to
> >harrass you.
>
> Let's test that theory.
>
> http://urlsnip.com/693363

Showing your true colors again I see. Good job George.

Still have a soft spot for this guy Sander?

These are the sort of things I don't think the group should tolerate.

ScottW

[surf]

" > wrote ...

> Notice how torresists doesn't get much in the way of response. IMO he's
> over the top with respect to you, but just as you are with Arny.

How can you make that comparison? It's not even close.
I've never disrespected a family member of Arny's - let alone
try to get them harassed. horrible ****ing argument, Mike.

[surf]

"ScottW" > wrote...
>
> These are the sort of things I don't think the group should tolerate.


You reading this, Malesweski? Nobody condones it. Sander, Mike,
ScottW and even Arny all think you're a ****bag for that behavior.
That's why you have no friends. That's why your life sucks.

[Clyde Slick]

"surf" > wrote in message
...
> " > wrote ...
>
>> Notice how torresists doesn't get much in the way of response. IMO he's
>> over the top with respect to you, but just as you are with Arny.
>
> How can you make that comparison? It's not even close.
> I've never disrespected a family member of Arny's - let alone
> try to get them harassed. horrible ****ing argument, Mike.
>

Mikey, how would you like it if we published your wife's cell phone
number, instead of us merely calling you an idiot and a bugeater?

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> > How can you make that comparison? It's not even close.
> > I've never disrespected a family member of Arny's - let alone
> > try to get them harassed. horrible ****ing argument, Mike.

> Mikey, how would you like it if we published your wife's cell phone
> number, instead of us merely calling you an idiot and a bugeater?

Arnii Kroopimp got some nice returns after he told us about his poor
wife's back-alley activities.

[ScottW]

"surf" > wrote in message
...
> "ScottW" > wrote...
>>
>> These are the sort of things I don't think the group should tolerate.
>
>
> You reading this, Malesweski? Nobody condones it. Sander, Mike,
> ScottW and even Arny all think you're a ****bag for that behavior.

I don't condone anyone going real world unless invited.

> That's why you have no friends. That's why your life sucks.

What's George's excuse?

ScottW

[surf]

"ScottW" > wrote ...
>
> "surf" > wrote ...
>> "ScottW" > wrote...
>>>
>>> These are the sort of things I don't think the group should tolerate.
>>
>> You reading this, Malesweski? Nobody condones it. Sander, Mike,
>> ScottW and even Arny all think you're a ****bag for that behavior.
>
> I don't condone anyone going real world unless invited.
>
>> That's why you have no friends. That's why your life sucks.
>
> What's George's excuse?

Don't be asking me. I don't actually know how much George has
gone "real world". Not as much as he would have us think, I suspect.

All this should stay here. It should be mano a mano.

[George M. Middius]

surf said:

> > What's George's excuse?
>
> Don't be asking me. I don't actually know how much George has
> gone "real world". Not as much as he would have us think, I suspect.

I once tried to get Krooger investigated by the IRS, but they weren't
interested in somebody who cheats the government out of $83 per year.

[[email protected]]

"surf" > wrote in message
...
> " > wrote ...
>
>> Notice how torresists doesn't get much in the way of response. IMO he's
>> over the top with respect to you, but just as you are with Arny.
>
> How can you make that comparison? It's not even close.
> I've never disrespected a family member of Arny's - let alone
> try to get them harassed. horrible ****ing argument, Mike.
Just because the degrees are different doesn't negate the argument.

[[email protected]]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "surf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> " > wrote ...
>>
>>> Notice how torresists doesn't get much in the way of response. IMO he's
>>> over the top with respect to you, but just as you are with Arny.
>>
>> How can you make that comparison? It's not even close.
>> I've never disrespected a family member of Arny's - let alone
>> try to get them harassed. horrible ****ing argument, Mike.
>>
>
> Mikey, how would you like it if we published your wife's cell phone
> number, instead of us merely calling you an idiot and a bugeater?
The Hobson's choice element aside, I've already said I thought it was
inappropriate.

[[email protected]]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>> > How can you make that comparison? It's not even close.
>> > I've never disrespected a family member of Arny's - let alone
>> > try to get them harassed. horrible ****ing argument, Mike.
>
>> Mikey, how would you like it if we published your wife's cell phone
>> number, instead of us merely calling you an idiot and a bugeater?
>
> Arnii Kroopimp got some nice returns after he told us about his poor
> wife's back-alley activities.
>
>
>
**** you George.

You are as always, a pig.

[George Middius]

Little Mickey McMickey oinked:

>> Arnii Kroopimp got some nice returns after he told us about his poor
>> wife's back-alley activities.

>**** you George.

A couple years ago, you said you get offended by dirty language. What happened
to change you from a prig into a filthpot?

>You are as always, a pig.

Is that your worst shot? The way you wallow in filth, you seem like a drunken
dung beetle.

I do respect your public admission that your command of grammar is inferior to a
dull-witted 13-year-old's. The first step in solving a problem is admitting its
scope.

[[email protected]]

"George Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Little Mickey McMickey oinked:
>
>>> Arnii Kroopimp got some nice returns after he told us about his poor
>>> wife's back-alley activities.
>
>>**** you George.
>
> A couple years ago, you said you get offended by dirty language. What
> happened
> to change you from a prig into a filthpot?
>
Yet another lie.

>>You are as always, a pig.
>
> Is that your worst shot? The way you wallow in filth, you seem like a
> drunken
> dung beetle.
>

One can only wonder at your bizare frame of refernce.

> I do respect your public admission that your command of grammar is
> inferior to a
> dull-witted 13-year-old's.

Inability to comprehend self depracating humor noted.

The first step in solving a problem is admitting its
> scope.
>
If irony killed.

[Clyde Slick]

" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "surf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> " > wrote ...
>>
>>> Notice how torresists doesn't get much in the way of response. IMO he's
>>> over the top with respect to you, but just as you are with Arny.
>>
>> How can you make that comparison? It's not even close.
>> I've never disrespected a family member of Arny's - let alone
>> try to get them harassed. horrible ****ing argument, Mike.


> Just because the degrees are different doesn't negate the argument.


AHA!!! We are making some headway here.
"At least" Mikey can see that the degrees are different.

[surf]

" > wrote...
>
> "surf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> " > wrote ...
>>
>>> Notice how torresists doesn't get much in the way of response. IMO he's
>>> over the top with respect to you, but just as you are with Arny.
>>
>> How can you make that comparison? It's not even close.
>> I've never disrespected a family member of Arny's - let alone
>> try to get them harassed. horrible ****ing argument, Mike.

> Just because the degrees are different doesn't negate the argument.

bull****. how come everyone else can see it?