George Middius
August 30th 05, 09:22 PM
In response to your suggestion that Arnii Krooborg substantiate his accusations
against JA with actual evidence, I'd like to offer the following bit of verbal
flotsam. This post of Mr. ****'s should demonstrate how hopeless it is to expect
him to meet minimal standards of intelligibility in discourse.
>Sighted evaluations are known to and therefore are designed
>to distract the listener from hearing small differences.
Somebody who didn't know the Krooglebeast might wonder if perhaps he's just a
little on the imaginative side. However, the reality is that Krooger is a raging
paranoiac. He sees conspiracies everywhere. He suspects plots and cabals in
every little event that doesn't conform to his elaborate constructs of
overlapping delusions.
In this example, Turdy first invents a "fact" (the bit about "known to..."). He
then hooks that unproven premise to the conspiracy he "knows" is afoot, i.e. the
massive "fraud" perpetrated by the E.H.E.E. in the form of terribly expensive
audio gear. And presto-changeo, you have a newly created Kroo-fact: Sighted
tests are a conspiracy.
This example is, sad to say, typical of Arnii Krooborg. He's a raving lunatic.
If you can get him to address your question about evidence supporting his
accusations against JA, the best you'll get is "asked and answered". Welcome to
the "debating trade".
against JA with actual evidence, I'd like to offer the following bit of verbal
flotsam. This post of Mr. ****'s should demonstrate how hopeless it is to expect
him to meet minimal standards of intelligibility in discourse.
>Sighted evaluations are known to and therefore are designed
>to distract the listener from hearing small differences.
Somebody who didn't know the Krooglebeast might wonder if perhaps he's just a
little on the imaginative side. However, the reality is that Krooger is a raging
paranoiac. He sees conspiracies everywhere. He suspects plots and cabals in
every little event that doesn't conform to his elaborate constructs of
overlapping delusions.
In this example, Turdy first invents a "fact" (the bit about "known to..."). He
then hooks that unproven premise to the conspiracy he "knows" is afoot, i.e. the
massive "fraud" perpetrated by the E.H.E.E. in the form of terribly expensive
audio gear. And presto-changeo, you have a newly created Kroo-fact: Sighted
tests are a conspiracy.
This example is, sad to say, typical of Arnii Krooborg. He's a raving lunatic.
If you can get him to address your question about evidence supporting his
accusations against JA, the best you'll get is "asked and answered". Welcome to
the "debating trade".