Marc Phillips Euthanasia apologist

[Lionel Chapuis]

Commenting about the + 11,000 death in France between 08/01 and 08/15
Marc Phillips write :

"Dying of stress from the heat because your body is not able to deal
with it is NATURAL SELECTION."

When people die in USA due to tornado, earthquake or any other natural
climatic calamity you should know it's "NATURAL SELECTION"

When WTC collasped people try to escape but was trapped inside they
died. you should know it's "NATURAL SELECTION" : explanation they run
slowly than the others !!!!

In such moment Mr. Phillips I would like to be in front of you in order
to help "NATURAL SELECTION".

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel Chapuis said:

>Commenting about the + 11,000 death in France between 08/01 and 08/15
>Marc Phillips write :
>
>"Dying of stress from the heat because your body is not able to deal
>with it is NATURAL SELECTION."
>
>When people die in USA due to tornado, earthquake or any other natural
>climatic calamity you should know it's "NATURAL SELECTION"

It could be, depending upon how broadly the insurance companies interpret the
situation. Tornadoes and earthquakes are what is known as "acts of God," and
therefore could be described as natural selection.

>
>When WTC collasped people try to escape but was trapped inside they
>died. you should know it's "NATURAL SELECTION" : explanation they run
>slowly than the others !!!!

That's not an explanation. Ability to run had nothing to do with those killed
by the initial impact. How many of the 3000 died because of that? Someone
aimed an airplane at them, a lethal weapon, and hit them with it. That is
murder. Murder is not natural selection.

Again, to prove your point, you'd have to say, "the sun has murdered the
French."

>
>In such moment Mr. Phillips I would like to be in front of you in order
>to help "NATURAL SELECTION".

Any time, Lionel. It's currently 99 degrees at my house, though, so I don't
think you'll do well.

Boon

[Lionel Chapuis]

>>When WTC collasped people try to escape but was trapped inside they
>>died. you should know it's "NATURAL SELECTION" : explanation they run
>>slowly than the others !!!!
>
>
> That's not an explanation. Ability to run had nothing to do with those killed
> by the initial impact. How many of the 3000 died because of that? Someone
> aimed an airplane at them, a lethal weapon, and hit them with it. That is
> murder. Murder is not natural selection.
>

Losing time but...
Mr. Phillips, I make effort to (badly) communicate in your language so
read what I've written !
I was just speaking about the people who was trying to escape before WTC
definitively collapsed. "NATURAL SELECTION" I cannot believe it...

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel Chapuis said:

>>>When WTC collasped people try to escape but was trapped inside they
>>>died. you should know it's "NATURAL SELECTION" : explanation they run
>>>slowly than the others !!!!
>>
>>
>> That's not an explanation. Ability to run had nothing to do with those
>killed
>> by the initial impact. How many of the 3000 died because of that? Someone
>> aimed an airplane at them, a lethal weapon, and hit them with it. That is
>> murder. Murder is not natural selection.
>>
>
>Losing time but...
>Mr. Phillips, I make effort to (badly) communicate in your language so
>read what I've written !

Read what you've so badly communicated? Makes about as much sense as
everything else you've said.

>I was just speaking about the people who was trying to escape before WTC
>definitively collapsed. "NATURAL SELECTION" I cannot believe it...

So you're differentiating between certain types of deaths in the WTC buildings.
I think you need to stop watching so many action movies, because people really
can't outrun explosions.

Boon

[Lionel Chapuis]

Marc Phillips a écrit :

> Again, to prove your point, you'd have to say, "the sun has murdered the
> French."
>
Too difficult.

I don't want to prove you anything, Mr. Phillips, I just try to explain
you that you have done a nasty joke on a public forum without any
consideration nor respect for dead people and their families.

I try to make you understand that irony around death and people
suffering is not a good human behaviour moreover when the disaster has
just happened when "ashes are still hot".

Mr. Phillips I am now sure that your day after day proclaimed pedophily
fight, your obstinate persecussion against Mr. Krueger is just a mask
behind which you hide a pervert personality.

Lionel Chapuis

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel Chapuis said:

>Marc Phillips a écrit :
>
>> So you're differentiating between certain types of deaths in the WTC
>buildings.
>> I think you need to stop watching so many action movies, because people
>really
>> can't outrun explosions.
>>
>
>Mr. Phillips you have a really disgusting way to "drawn the fish"

What?

Boon

[Lionel Chapuis]

Marc Phillips a écrit :

> Mr. Middius said:
>
>
>>Marc Phillips said:
>>
>>
>>>>behind which you hide a pervert personality.
>>
>>>What?
>>
>>Try this: "Qu'est-ce que tu veux dire?"
>
>
> Can I follow it with a "fa-fa-FAH fa-fa-fa-fa-FAH-fa"?
>
> Boon
>
>
Mr. Middius, one question please.
How will Boony-boy will remunerate your precious french lessons ?

Lionel

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Lionel Chapuis" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
...
> >
> >
> Mr. Middius, one question please.
> How will Boony-boy will remunerate your precious french lessons ?
>

Mr. Chapius, one question please.
How does someone who can't put together the simplest sentence
in English get a word like "remunerate" correct?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Lionel Chapuis]

Sockpuppet Yustabe a écrit :

> "Lionel Chapuis" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
> ...
>
>>>
>>Mr. Middius, one question please.
>>How will Boony-boy will remunerate your precious french lessons ?
>>
>
>
> Mr. Chapius, one question please.
> How does someone who can't put together the simplest sentence
> in English get a word like "remunerate" correct?
>
Sir,
As suspicion/paranoia are rules here I understand your question and
don't take it in bad part.
"To remunerate" french translation is "rémunérer" so you see it's easy
to remember.
Thank you for your congratulations !

Lionel

PS : please note that my name is Mr. Chapuis and not Mr. Chapius. You
can also call me Lionel. No offense.

[George M. Middius]

"Lionel Chapuis" (LOL! LOt"S!) said:

> > Mr. Chapius, one question please.
> > How does someone who can't put together the simplest sentence
> > in English get a word like "remunerate" correct?
> >
> Sir,
> As suspicion/paranoia are rules here I understand your question and
> don't take it in bad part.
> "To remunerate" french translation is "rémunérer" so you see it's easy
> to remember.
> Thank you for your congratulations !


Suddenly the syntax improves a little. I guess Art distracted you
with the query about spelling, and you couldn't juggle both the
heinous diction and the fractured grammar at the same time.

[Lionel Chapuis]

MiNE 109 a écrit :
> In article >,
> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote:
>
>
>>"Lionel Chapuis" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
...
>>
>>>>
>>>Mr. Middius, one question please.
>>>How will Boony-boy will remunerate your precious french lessons ?
>>>
>>
>>Mr. Chapius, one question please.
>>How does someone who can't put together the simplest sentence
>>in English get a word like "remunerate" correct?
>
>
> It's a cognate.
>
> Stephen

It is. Thank Stephen.