Only In America - A Little Humor To Take the Place of the Flames

[Bruce J. Richman]

1. Only in America......can a pizza get to your house
faster than an ambulance.

2. Only in America.....are there
handicap parking places in front of a
skating rink.

3. Only in America.....do drugstores
make the sick walk all the way to the
back of the store to get their
prescriptions while healthy people can buy
cigarettes at the front.

4. Only in America.....do people order
double cheeseburgers, large fries,
and a diet coke.

5. Only in America.....do banks leave
both doors open and then chain the
pens to the counters.

6. Only in America.....do we leave cars
worth thousands of dollars in the
driveway and put our useless junk in the
garage.

7. Only in America.....do we use
answering machines to screen calls and
then have call waiting so we won't miss a
call from someone we didn't want
to talk to in the first place.

8. Only in America......do we buy hot
dogs in packages of ten and buns in
packages of eight.

9. Only in America.....do we use the
word 'politics' to describe the process so well:
'Poll' in Latin meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning
'bloodsucking creatures'.

10. Only in America.....do they have
drive-up ATM machines with Braille lettering.


I apologize to the few chronic compulsive liars and posters of libel on RAO.
I realize that this post will not meet with your approval. Of course, you can
always delete it, and then go ahead with your usual character defamation, if
you just can't stop jonesing for another unsolicited personal attack.

For the rest of you (the 99% majority on RAO), lighten up, enjoy what I thought
was a nicely written little piece of humor, and relax.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------


Follow Ups:

Bruce J. Richman

[Lionel Chapuis]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :


> I apologize to the few chronic compulsive liars and posters of libel on RAO.
> I realize that this post will not meet with your approval. Of course, you can
> always delete it, and then go ahead with your usual character defamation, if
> you just can't stop jonesing for another unsolicited personal attack.
>
> For the rest of you (the 99% majority on RAO), lighten up, enjoy what I thought
> was a nicely written little piece of humor, and relax.

If you are really this man :

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Why do you feel obliged to write the above ?

Lionel

[Bruce J. Richman]

Lionel Chapuis wrote:


>Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>
>
>> I apologize to the few chronic compulsive liars and posters of libel on
>RAO.
>> I realize that this post will not meet with your approval. Of course, you
>can
>> always delete it, and then go ahead with your usual character defamation,
>if
>> you just can't stop jonesing for another unsolicited personal attack.
>>
>> For the rest of you (the 99% majority on RAO), lighten up, enjoy what I
>thought
>> was a nicely written little piece of humor, and relax.
>
>If you are really this man :
>
> Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
> Licensed Psychologist
>
>Why do you feel obliged to write the above ?
>
>Lionel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yes, I really am this person, Lionel. Does the fact that you question it, mean
that you would prefer to believe individuals such as Krueger? If so, that is
your right (and problem), I guess.

And no, I don't feel "obliged" to do write any particular thing on RAO. I was
simply making an observation about what usually goes on there.

Why did you feel compelled to be the only poster to comment in a negative way
about a humorous post? BTW, my comments at the end were also intened to be
humourous - via the use of sarcasm and irony, of course. I can understand,
since English is your 2nd (or 3rd ?) language, if you may have decided to take
my comments literally and misinterpret them.

And Lionel, since you have chosen to delete the "Only In Ameica" section, I
think you've just proven my point.

I guess you'd prefer to be excluded from the 99 % of the RAO posters who seem
to have taken my advice.

LOL!


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

[Bruce J. Richman]

Arny Krueger lies again:


>"Lionel Chapuis" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message

>> Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>>
>>
>>> I apologize to the few chronic compulsive liars and posters of
>>> libel on RAO. I realize that this post will not meet with your
>>> approval. Of course, you can always delete it, and then go ahead
>>> with your usual character defamation, if you just can't stop
>>> jonesing for another unsolicited personal attack.
>>>
>>> For the rest of you (the 99% majority on RAO), lighten up, enjoy
>>> what I thought was a nicely written little piece of humor, and relax.
>>
>> If you are really this man :
>>
>> Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
>> Licensed Psychologist
>>
>> Why do you feel obliged to write the above ?
>
>Obviously, Richman is very unsure of himself unless he constantly flashes
>his purported credentials.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

As already explained, I have chosen to sign my name at this time this way to
provide supportive evidence for Mr. Scott Wheeler's pending libel suit against
compulsive liar Krueger.

I'd like to thank compulsive liar Krueger for once again libeling me by using
the word "purported" in front of the word "credentials". My credentials are a
matter of public record, and have been detailed previously.

Krueger's "credentials" as a RAO"s Most Widely Hated and Despised Poster
because of his documented history of lying, libeling, and character
assassination are also a matter of public record and can be easily found at
www.Google.com.

The Google record will also show that in the 7 or so years I've been posting on
RAO, I've usually signed by name simply, Bruce J. Richman, so once again,
Krueger is lying. His jealousy, envy and paranoia are pretty obvious.

He has also recently been exposed as a poorly informed anti-psychlogy bigot
who has publically lied on RAO about the licensing qualifications for
psychologists.
He has been unable to refute any of the detailed requirements that I have
described for the licensing of psychologists in the United States. (Similar
requirements also exist in Canada, btw).

Perhaps "licensing expert" Krueger can tell us why he meets the licensing
requrements for compulsive liars. We already know that he meets many
requirements for involuntary committment to a psychiatric facility.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger by Mr. Scott
Wheeler, in anticipation of providing supportive documentary evidence).



Bruce J. Richman

[Lionel Chapuis]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

"I was simply making an observation about what usually goes on there."

"BTW, my comments at the end were also intened to be humourous - via the
use of sarcasm and irony, of course."

"LOL!"

Good evening Bruce, thank you for your answer.
I sincerely liked your "Only in America", but to be honest the pleasure
has been diluted by the last sentences.
The kind of humour you have introduce with this "chanson" is usually
sufficient to itself and, from my point of view, not compatible with
sarcasm and irony. Are they humour ?... This could be an other debate.

To summerize, it's free of charge, humour intent to make you laugh. I
suggest you in these precious moments to forget the 1% which make you
feel so sad.

Lionel

[Bruce J. Richman]

Lionel wrote:


>Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>
>"I was simply making an observation about what usually goes on there."
>
>"BTW, my comments at the end were also intened to be humourous - via the
>use of sarcasm and irony, of course."
>
>"LOL!"
>
>Good evening Bruce, thank you for your answer.

Bon soir, Lionel. Mon plasir.

>I sincerely liked your "Only in America", but to be honest the pleasure
>has been diluted by the last sentences.
>The kind of humour you have introduce with this "chanson" is usually
>sufficient to itself and, from my point of view, not compatible with
>sarcasm and irony. Are they humour ?... This could be an other debate.
>
>To summerize, it's free of charge, humour intent to make you laugh. I
>suggest you in these precious moments to forget the 1% which make you
>feel so sad.
>


The 1 % don't make me sad at all. I generally just laugh at their ignorance.



>Lionel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Bruce J. Richman

[Lionel Chapuis]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

> I guess you'd prefer to be excluded from the 99 % of the RAO posters who seem
> to have taken my advice.
>
> LOL!
>

Bruce,

May I understand that the only therapy you propose me is to join the 99%
of RAO poster ?

Thank you for your help, but I think I will play the "black sheep" a
little bit longer !

Lionel

[Bruce J. Richman]

Lionel Chapuis wrote:


>Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>
>> I guess you'd prefer to be excluded from the 99 % of the RAO posters who
>seem
>> to have taken my advice.
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>
>Bruce,
>
>May I understand that the only therapy you propose me is to join the 99%
>of RAO poster ?
>

I'm not suggesting any therapy at all for you, Lionel :).

The only thing I would suggest is that it might be helpful for you to *not*
take specific statements and quote them out of context. Next time, it would be
helpful if you reproduced the whole post to which you're responding, and then
insert your comments whereever you like.


>Thank you for your help, but I think I will play the "black sheep" a
>little bit longer !
>

Chacun a son gout.


>Lionel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Bruce J. Richman

[Michael Mckelvy]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> Arny Krueger lies again:
>
>
> >"Lionel Chapuis" <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote in message
>
> >> Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
> >>
> >>
> >>> I apologize to the few chronic compulsive liars and posters of
> >>> libel on RAO. I realize that this post will not meet with your
> >>> approval. Of course, you can always delete it, and then go ahead
> >>> with your usual character defamation, if you just can't stop
> >>> jonesing for another unsolicited personal attack.
> >>>
> >>> For the rest of you (the 99% majority on RAO), lighten up, enjoy
> >>> what I thought was a nicely written little piece of humor, and relax.
> >>
> >> If you are really this man :
> >>
> >> Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
> >> Licensed Psychologist
> >>
> >> Why do you feel obliged to write the above ?
> >
> >Obviously, Richman is very unsure of himself unless he constantly flashes
> >his purported credentials.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> As already explained, I have chosen to sign my name at this time this way
to
> provide supportive evidence for Mr. Scott Wheeler's pending libel suit
against
> compulsive liar Krueger.
>
> I'd like to thank compulsive liar Krueger for once again libeling me by
using
> the word "purported" in front of the word "credentials". My credentials
are a
> matter of public record, and have been detailed previously.
>
> Krueger's "credentials" as a RAO"s Most Widely Hated and Despised Poster
> because of his documented history of lying, libeling, and character
> assassination are also a matter of public record and can be easily found
at
> www.Google.com.
>
> The Google record will also show that in the 7 or so years I've been
posting on
> RAO, I've usually signed by name simply, Bruce J. Richman, so once again,
> Krueger is lying. His jealousy, envy and paranoia are pretty obvious.
>
When you first started posting here you signed with the PhD etc., etc. I
thought the only reason you stopped was because nobody took you seriously
since you were so obviously full of **** and nobody en those not in their
right mind would seek you out for therapy.

> He has also recently been exposed as a poorly informed anti-psychlogy
bigot
> who has publically lied on RAO about the licensing qualifications for
> psychologists.
> He has been unable to refute any of the detailed requirements that I have
> described for the licensing of psychologists in the United States.
(Similar
> requirements also exist in Canada, btw).
>
> Perhaps "licensing expert" Krueger can tell us why he meets the licensing
> requrements for compulsive liars. We already know that he meets many
> requirements for involuntary committment to a psychiatric facility.
>
>
> Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
> Licensed Psychologist
>
> (signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger by Mr.
Scott
> Wheeler, in anticipation of providing supportive documentary evidence).
>
>
>
> Bruce J. Richman
>
>
>

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message
...
>
obvious.
> >
> When you first started posting here you signed with the PhD etc., etc. I
> thought the only reason you stopped was because nobody took you seriously
> since you were so obviously full of **** and nobody en those not in their
> right mind would seek you out for therapy.
>


I take it your humor is completely unintentional.
Someone in his 'right mind' wouldn't need therapy from anybody.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Michael Mckelvy]

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> obvious.
> > >
> > When you first started posting here you signed with the PhD etc., etc.
I
> > thought the only reason you stopped was because nobody took you
seriously
> > since you were so obviously full of **** and nobody, even those not in
their
> > right mind would seek you out for therapy.
> >
>
>
> I take it your humor is completely unintentional.
> Someone in his 'right mind' wouldn't need therapy from anybody.
>
It was intentional.

Surpise.
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
> http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
Newsgroups
> ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption
=---

[Bruce J. Richman]

Sockpuppet Yustube wrote:

>"Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message
...
>>
>obvious.
>> >
>> When you first started posting here you signed with the PhD etc., etc. I
>> thought the only reason you stopped was because nobody took you seriously
>> since you were so obviously full of **** and nobody en those not in their
>> right mind would seek you out for therapy.
>>
>
>
>I take it your humor is completely unintentional.
>Someone in his 'right mind' wouldn't need therapy from anybody.
>
>
>
>
>----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>News==----
>http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
>Newsgroups
>---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption
>=---
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Art - trying to engage in intelligent speech with a subhuman cretin like the
compulsive liar and libeler, McKelvy is a waste of time. He's been spewing his
bull**** on RAO and displaying his bigoted ignorance here for years. He's a
pathetic, paranoid, totally insane creep who is almost as widely despised and
ridiculed as Krueger and Ferstler. These three should change their names to
Moe, Shemp and Larry - RAO's Axis of Evil.


Since today is September 20, 2003 and according to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll
sign my name with the degree which I've earned:

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger and probable
need to supply supportive documentary evidence).

P.S. Eat you heart out, libeler and liar, McKelvy - you couldn't earn a degree
in phrenology, you pathetic loser - LOL!!!

(But perhaps you can get a job testing lie detectors, or straight jackets).




Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

Art wrote:


>"Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message
...
>>
>obvious.
>> >
>> When you first started posting here you signed with the PhD etc., etc. I
>> thought the only reason you stopped was because nobody took you seriously
>> since you were so obviously full of **** and nobody en those not in their
>> right mind would seek you out for therapy.
>>
>
>
>I take it your humor is completely unintentional.
>Someone in his 'right mind' wouldn't need therapy from anybody.
>
>
>
>
>----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>News==----
>http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
>Newsgroups
>---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption
>=---
>
>
>
>
>
>

Notice duh-Mikey's high degree of literacy in the bumbling response he managed
to excrete. duh-Mikey is not familiar with people in their right mind, since
they shun him like all normal, objective people meeting him would. After all,
who wants to listen to his lies, insane rantings and ravings, and great ability
to decompensate into a blithering idiot whenever he tries to complete a
sentence? For duh-Mikey, as for those with advanced Alzheimer's, every day is
a brand new day :(


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled to
begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide supportive
documentary evidence).
Bruce J. Richman

[Powell]

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote

> Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
> to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll sign my name with the
> degree which I've earned:
>
Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
bravado.

[George M. Middius]

Powell gibbered:

> > Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
> > to Scott Wheeler, D-Day...

> Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
> bravado.

Only a fruitcake like you would expect somebody to file a lawsuit on
a Saturday. Or maybe you get your marching orders directly from
Jesus, and He told you to take up for Krooger and start throwing
stones at Mister Wheeler. Either way, you appear to have lost as
many marbles as Lionella.

[Lionel]

George M. Middius a écrit :
>
> Powell gibbered:
>
>
>>>Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
>>>to Scott Wheeler, D-Day...
>
>
>>Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
>>bravado.
>
>
> Only a fruitcake like you would expect somebody to file a lawsuit on
> a Saturday. Or maybe you get your marching orders directly from
> Jesus, and He told you to take up for Krooger and start throwing
> stones at Mister Wheeler. Either way, you appear to have lost as
> many marbles as Lionella.
>
>
>
Georgetta,

Daily you prove us that there's no specific day for stupidity.
S888WheelChair is a moron and a cretin he gave me final proof recently.
He is so stupid that he doesn't understand that your are more dangerous
for him than Krueger.
:o)
Lionel

--
"Keep the bugs off your glass and the bears off your ass"
Bad Plus

[Bruce J. Richman]

Powell wrote:


>"Bruce J. Richman" wrote
>
>> Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
>> to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll sign my name with the
>> degree which I've earned:
>>
>Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
>bravado.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

It remains to be seen. Time will tell.




Bruce J. Richman

[S888Wheel]

<<
Daily you prove us that there's no specific day for stupidity.
S888WheelChair is a moron and a cretin he gave me final proof recently.
He is so stupid that he doesn't understand that your are more dangerous
for him than Krueger.
:o)
Lionel >>


Lionel it seems every day is a day for stupidity for you.

[George M. Middius]

S888Wheel said:

> Lionel it seems every day is a day for stupidity for you.

Got that right. I think Lionella's strategy is to make Krooger look
less stupid than he actually is.

[Lionel]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
> Powell wrote:
>
>
>
>>"Bruce J. Richman" wrote
>>
>>
>>>Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
>>>to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll sign my name with the
>>>degree which I've earned:
>>>
>>
>>Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
>>bravado.
>
>
> It remains to be seen. Time will tell.
>
>
>
>
> Bruce J. Richman
>

My dear little Scotty,

It seems your supporters are in the arena for the final fight.
You are their hero, their Hercules.
Do you remember the 5th of his famous tasks : Augias' stables.
Most of the time RAO also stink like Augias' stables.
Are you ready to clean all this **** by diverting the rivers ?

Lionel

--
"Keep the bugs off your glass and the bears off your ass"
Bad Plus

[Lionel]

George M. Middius a écrit :
>
> S888Wheel said:
>
>
>>Lionel it seems every day is a day for stupidity for you.
>
>
> Got that right. I think Lionella's strategy is to make Krooger look
> less stupid than he actually is.
>
>
>
Blah ! Blah ! Blah !

--
"Keep the bugs off your glass and the bears off your ass"
Bad Plus

[Lionel]

S888Wheel a écrit :
> <<
> Daily you prove us that there's no specific day for stupidity.
> S888WheelChair is a moron and a cretin he gave me final proof recently.
> He is so stupid that he doesn't understand that your are more dangerous
> for him than Krueger.
> :o)
> Lionel >>
>
>
> Lionel it seems every day is a day for stupidity for you.

Don't call me Lionel but Mr. Chapuis or Lionella if you want.
You still haven't answered to my last message on the other thread.
I sincerely think that you are a liar, an hypocrite.

Lionel Chapuis
--
"Keep the bugs off your glass and the bears off your ass"
Bad Plus

[S888Wheel]

<<
Don't call me Lionel but Mr. Chapuis or Lionella if you want.
You still haven't answered to my last message on the other thread.
I sincerely think that you are a liar, an hypocrite.

Lionel Chapuis
-- >>


I must have deleted it without reading as I do with the vast majority of your
posts. Your opinions are nothing more than background noise to me. When one
looks at the people you seem to admire on RAO, I might be offended if you had a
better opinion of me.

[Bruce J. Richman]

George M. Middius wrote:


>S888Wheel said:
>
>> Lionel it seems every day is a day for stupidity for you.
>
>Got that right. I think Lionella's strategy is to make Krooger look
>less stupid than he actually is.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

If he wants to do that, he should refer interested readers to RAO's resident
"Special Ed" aka duh-Mikey.



Bruce J. Richman

[Lionel]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>
>
>>S888Wheel said:
>>
>>
>>>Lionel it seems every day is a day for stupidity for you.
>>
>>Got that right. I think Lionella's strategy is to make Krooger look
>>less stupid than he actually is.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> If he wants to do that, he should refer interested readers to RAO's resident
> "Special Ed" aka duh-Mikey.
>
>
>
> Bruce J. Richman
>

Mr. Richman,

We had only a few words 3 or 4 weeks ago. It seems me that our exchanges
finished in a courteous way.
I don't care about Mikey, I never read anything from him.
You are too much intelligent to have the same behaviour than
S888WheelChair : he use to defy others and after that he cries like a
virgin whom one rapes.

Thank you for your time,
Lionel

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel said:

>Blah ! Blah ! Blah !

In addition to being a sad, pathetic Internet geek who spends all his time
trolling on a newsgroup that can't understand his butchered English, Lionel
also turns out to be a last-word freak, too.

Amazing.

Boon

[Lionel]

Marc Phillips a écrit :
> Lionel said:
>
>
>>Blah ! Blah ! Blah !
>
>
> In addition to being a sad, pathetic Internet geek who spends all his time
> trolling on a newsgroup that can't understand his butchered English, Lionel
> also turns out to be a last-word freak, too.
>
> Amazing.
>
> Boon
>
>
;-)

[Lionel]

S888Wheel a écrit :

> <<
> Don't call me Lionel but Mr. Chapuis or Lionella if you want.
> You still haven't answered to my last message on the other thread.
> I sincerely think that you are a liar, an hypocrite.
>
> Lionel Chapuis
> -- >>
>
>
> I must have deleted it without reading as I do with the vast majority of your
> posts. Your opinions are nothing more than background noise to me. When one
> looks at the people you seem to admire on RAO, I might be offended if you had a
> better opinion of me.

And moreover you are too conceited.

[Powell]

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote

> >> Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
> >> to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll sign my name with the
> >> degree which I've earned:
> >>
> >Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
> >bravado.
> >
> It remains to be seen. Time will tell.
>
Ok, what is a reasonable time for you to change
your opinion on the existence of the litigation...
10 day, 30 days? The failure to perform needn’t
dash your spirits. Maybe someday Arny really will
cross the line... hope remain eternal, after all :).

[George M. Middius]

Powell said:

> Ok, what is a reasonable time for you to change
> your opinion on the existence of the litigation...
> 10 day, 30 days?

Hey stupid, how do you expect somebody to file a lawsuit on a
Saturday? Huh? Huh? Huh? If he filed on Friday, that would have been
the 19th, meaning he went back on his word, which maybe he didn't
want to do. Got any answers, stupid?

[George M. Middius]

Powell said:

> > Only a fruitcake like you would expect somebody to
> > file a lawsuit on a Saturday.

> Hehehe... oh man, you're a dreamer, George.
> Do you feel disappointed because Arny slipped
> through your fingers again?

Do you expect somebody to file a lawsuit on a Saturday?

****ing moron.

[Powell]

"George M. Middius" wrote
> Powell said:
>
> > Ok, what is a reasonable time for you to change
> > your opinion on the existence of the litigation...
> > 10 days, 30 days?
>
> Hey stupid, how do you expect somebody to
> file a lawsuit on a Saturday?
>
George, you can have a month of Sundays so
to speak and arrive at the same conclusion...
bravado, mr. egg-on-face :).

[Powell]

"George M. Middius" wrote

> > Hehehe... oh man, you're a dreamer, George.
> > Do you feel disappointed because Arny slipped
> > through your fingers again?
>
> Do you expect somebody to file a lawsuit on a
> Saturday?
>
No, but I suspect frivolous cases are created in
the minds of foolish people 24/7.

[Lionel]

George M. Middius a écrit :
>
> Powell said:
>
>
>>Ok, what is a reasonable time for you to change
>>your opinion on the existence of the litigation...
>>10 day, 30 days?
>
>
> Hey stupid, how do you expect somebody to file a lawsuit on a
> Saturday? Huh? Huh? Huh? If he filed on Friday, that would have been
> the 19th, meaning he went back on his word, which maybe he didn't
> want to do. Got any answers, stupid?
>
>
NostraMiddius prediction :
This is what we can call "self-humiliation"

De :George M. Middius )
Objet :Prediction on Libel Action

Date :2003-09-01 10:21:21 PST

[snip]

My prediction: On Sept. 19 or 20 -- but not before -- Krooger will
comply in a half-assed way. He will claim that he consulted a lawyer or
lawyers earlier, but the lawyers lied to him. He'll also claim he did
voluminous research on libel law in Michigan, California, and the
U.S., but the books he read lied to him. He'll further claim that
although he made the post, it wasn't really his fault, because
Wheeler's "teammates" or "co-conspirators" or "fellow paid character
assassins" have made the same accusation against Krooger. Or because
RAO has been a nasty little playground for years. Or because Wheeler
"insulted" Krooger at some point. Or some other flimsy excuse. In
short, the apology will be unsatisfactory because Krooger will avoid
taking responsibility for what he said.

[George M. Middius]

Powell said:

> > Do you expect somebody to file a lawsuit on a
> > Saturday?
> >
> No

Then why are you gloating? The deadline hasn't passed.

****ing moron.

[Powell]

"George M. Middius" wrote

> > > Do you expect somebody to file a lawsuit on a
> > > Saturday?
> > >
> > No
>
> Then why are you gloating? The deadline hasn't
> passed.
>
Deadline on a non-starter? Are you *praying*
for a miracle ?

So George, has Scott retained an attorney
yet... I didn't think so either. NEXT, as Arny
would say :).

[Bruce J. Richman]

Powell wrote:

>
>"Bruce J. Richman" wrote
>
>> >> Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
>> >> to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll sign my name with the
>> >> degree which I've earned:
>> >>
>> >Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
>> >bravado.
>> >
>> It remains to be seen. Time will tell.
>>
>Ok, what is a reasonable time for you to change
>your opinion on the existence of the litigation...
>10 day, 30 days? The failure to perform needn’t
>dash your spirits. Maybe someday Arny really will
>cross the line... hope remain eternal, after all :).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

You're assuming a "failure to perform" for which there is no evidence, as of
yet. As for "time limits", I've yet to hear of libel litigation that gets
settled in 30 days - although I suppose an out-of-court settlement is always a
possibility. Krueger has crossed the line many times with many people in RAO
- so hope has nothing to do with it. The fact that many have chosen to let
this documented liar and libeler get away with his regular character
assassination smears doesn't mean he hasn't crossed the line. It just
indicates that many simply don't think c-l-K is worth bothering with.


Bruce J. Richman

[Powell]

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote

> >> >> Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
> >> >> to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll sign my name with the
> >> >> degree which I've earned:
> >> >>
> >> >Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
> >> >bravado.
> >> >
> >> It remains to be seen. Time will tell.
> >>
> >Ok, what is a reasonable time for you to change
> >your opinion on the existence of the litigation...
> >10 day, 30 days? The failure to perform needn't
> >dash your spirits. Maybe someday Arny really will
> >cross the line... hope remain eternal, after all :).
> >
> You're assuming a "failure to perform" for which there
> is no evidence, as of yet.
>
Yes, I agree that if the paperwork is properly
completed to the satisfaction of the clerk it will be
recorded as is proper and right... only to die a
natural death, *no cause for action*. Is that the
victory you seek?


> As for "time limits", I've yet to hear of libel litigation
> that gets settled in 30 days - although I suppose an
> out-of-court settlement is always a possibility.
>
Only if you send money to Scott for legal
representation, Bruce :).


> Krueger has crossed the line many times with
> many people in RAO - so hope has nothing to
> do with it.
>
You're speaking to the choir.


> The fact that many have chosen to let this
> documented liar and libeler get away with his
> regular character assassination smears
> doesn't mean he hasn't crossed the line. It just
> indicates that many simply don't think c-l-K is
> worth bothering with.
>
"get away with"... ultimately what does he get
really get away with? Could you quantify those
feelings, please? Then balance those with
USEnet's intent and the requirement for *real
damages* for litigious actions. I'm not in
disagreement about Arny's lack of civility or
that he has caused emotional hardship on
some... I empathize for them. Arny is a
metaphor for the wrecking ball challenging
your norms and standards of conduct. My own
read is that Arny influence extends for no further
than his ability to outpost (noise) anyone here.

"worth bothering"... all men seek glory... that's
a common universal archetype, Bruce :).

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Powell gibbered:
>
> > > Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
> > > to Scott Wheeler, D-Day...
>
> > Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
> > bravado.
>
> Only a fruitcake like you would expect somebody to file a lawsuit on
> a Saturday. Or maybe you get your marching orders directly from
> Jesus, and He told you to take up for Krooger and start throwing
> stones at Mister Wheeler. Either way, you appear to have lost as
> many marbles as Lionella.
>


"At least" they are American marbles.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Lionel]

Sockpuppet Yustabe a écrit :
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>>Powell gibbered:
>>
>>
>>>>Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
>>>>to Scott Wheeler, D-Day...
>>
>>>Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
>>>bravado.
>>
>>Only a fruitcake like you would expect somebody to file a lawsuit on
>>a Saturday. Or maybe you get your marching orders directly from
>>Jesus, and He told you to take up for Krooger and start throwing
>>stones at Mister Wheeler. Either way, you appear to have lost as
>>many marbles as Lionella.
>>
>
>
>
> "At least" they are American marbles.
>

Are you a friend of Boonie-Boy ?

A disciple of Dennis Prager ?.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/dp20030902.shtml
This following one is also very good
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/dp20030415.shtml
The main site :
http://www.dennisprager.com/

Nota : caution if you are Arab, French, non-christian... More generally
if you aren't white American Christian you need a bulletproof jacket to
enter in the above web site...

Too many people like you would lead us to regret the political situation
before 1989 ! (c;

This his the place where NostraMiddious recruits his partisans

[Bruce J. Richman]

Powell wrote:


>"Bruce J. Richman" wrote
>
>> >> >> Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
>> >> >> to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll sign my name with the
>> >> >> degree which I've earned:
>> >> >>
>> >> >Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
>> >> >bravado.
>> >> >
>> >> It remains to be seen. Time will tell.
>> >>
>> >Ok, what is a reasonable time for you to change
>> >your opinion on the existence of the litigation...
>> >10 day, 30 days? The failure to perform needn't
>> >dash your spirits. Maybe someday Arny really will
>> >cross the line... hope remain eternal, after all :).
>> >
>> You're assuming a "failure to perform" for which there
>> is no evidence, as of yet.
>>
>Yes, I agree that if the paperwork is properly
>completed to the satisfaction of the clerk it will be
>recorded as is proper and right... only to die a
>natural death, *no cause for action*. Is that the
>victory you seek?
>

So you're predicting a libel suit will be unsuccessful. You probably also feel
that any litigation based on stuff written on the Internet is non-actionable.
I don't. In a very real sense, the "victory" you think I seek has already
been won a long time ago - by Ed Shain's thread and the impressive list of real
individuals (not sockpuppets) listed as targets of Krueger's (& McKelvey"s)
smear campaigns and character assassination. Every time these 2 hatemongers
are ridiculed on RAO, another "victory" takes place. And there is a
difference, Powell, between the gratuitous personal insults these 2 regularly
spew, and the libelous lies about a person's credentials and/or profession that
they attempt to spread. It is the latter that might be grounds for a libel
suit. In Scott Wheeler's case, the motivation is different. And perhaps you
don't think that John Atkinson would have a case either, despite all the lies
Krueger (and his defender, McKelvey) has spread about Stereophile and its
writers. (and I'm not talking about differences in opinion, but provable
falsehoods - e.g. payola accusations, attempts to defraud the pub lic, etc.).
I'm perfectly content to let the courts decide this, Powell. Scott has
received legal advice which hopefully is fairly valid - so we'll just have to
wait and see what happens.



>
>> As for "time limits", I've yet to hear of libel litigation
>> that gets settled in 30 days - although I suppose an
>> out-of-court settlement is always a possibility.
>>
>Only if you send money to Scott for legal
>representation, Bruce :).
>
>

LOL! If any money is sent, it will by Krueger, not me. :) Or perhaps, as
indicated, Scott will settle for a public retraction in RAO by Krueger.

>> Krueger has crossed the line many times with
>> many people in RAO - so hope has nothing to
>> do with it.
>>
>You're speaking to the choir.
>

Good. I think about 95% oif those that post here or lurk are the choir in this
case.

>
>> The fact that many have chosen to let this
>> documented liar and libeler get away with his
>> regular character assassination smears
>> doesn't mean he hasn't crossed the line. It just
>> indicates that many simply don't think c-l-K is
>> worth bothering with.
>>
>"get away with"... ultimately what does he get
>really get away with? Could you quantify those
>feelings, please?

Of course I can't, as you know. But he has freedom of speech here since it's
an unmoderated group, as you know. He's complained about having his posts
rejected lately by the moderators at RAHE (part of Krueger's latest paranoid
conspiracy theory). And he's always opposed attempts to turn RAO into a
moderated group as well. Why do you suppose that is?

Then balance those with
>USEnet's intent and the requirement for *real
>damages* for litigious actions.

I think that if Scott can show that his being publically labeled as a pedophile
in a widely read Usenet newsgroup is libelous, he has a decent chance of
winning his case - but that would be up to the courts to decide. I don't
presume, as you do, I guess, that all name-calling here and all lies here are
harmless. Accusing somebody of criminatl behavior or practicing a profession
without a license - as Krueger has done repeatedly on RAO - are quite likely
actionable in my view. You assume that since almost nobody believes him, it
does no harm. Have I lost any business (or has Scot) because of this? It's
probably impossible to tell. (Same would apply for Stereophile, I suppose).


I'm not in
>disagreement about Arny's lack of civility or
>that he has caused emotional hardship on
>some... I empathize for them. Arny is a
>metaphor for the wrecking ball challenging
>your norms and standards of conduct. My own
>read is that Arny influence extends for no further
>than his ability to outpost (noise) anyone here.
>
>"worth bothering"... all men seek glory... that's
>a common universal archetype, Bruce :).
>
>
>
>

A "victory" over Krueger is hardly what I would call "glory". I'd much rather
be respected by my colleagues and peers - in both my social life and
professional life. :)

I trust that Mr. Wheeler will give us an update in the near future re. his
legal issues with c-l-K.



Bruce J. Richman

[Lionel]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>
> I trust that Mr. Wheeler will give us an update in the near future re. his
> legal issues with c-l-K.
>
>
>
> Bruce J. Richman
>
>
>

S888WheelChair AKA "Scott Wheeler" is a pathologic "bloody-nuisance" he
got what he was looking for.
Let's have a look to the above thread he start again...

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

[Arny Krueger]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> <<
> Daily you prove us that there's no specific day for stupidity.
> S888WheelChair is a moron and a cretin he gave me final proof recently.
> He is so stupid that he doesn't understand that your are more dangerous
> for him than Krueger.
> :o)
> Lionel >>
>
>
> Lionel it seems every day is a day for stupidity for you.

ROTFLMAO!

[Arny Krueger]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> Powell wrote:
>
>
> >"Bruce J. Richman" wrote
> >
> >> Since today is September 20, 2003 and according
> >> to Scott Wheeler, D-Day, I'll sign my name with the
> >> degree which I've earned:
> >>
> >Scott will take a powder on that issue... it was all
> >bravado.

> It remains to be seen. Time will tell.

It's the 23d and sockpuppet "Wheel" is a no-show as predicted.

[S888Wheel]

>
>
>It's the 23d and sockpuppet "Wheel" is a no-show as predicted.
>

I guess you simply didn't understand what the 20th deadline meant. Not
surprising. No arny I am still here. I thought there was a remote chance that
you might show some decency and intelegence and do the right thing. You didn't.
I figured why go through the bother of preparing a proper complaint if I might
not have to file it. Well the deadline has come and gone and the complaint is
in the works.

Scott Wheeler

[Arny Krueger]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >
> >
> >It's the 23d and sockpuppet "Wheel" is a no-show as predicted.
> >
>
> I guess you simply didn't understand what the 20th deadline meant.


It meant I was still in the woods, breathing fresh air, tasting fresh water.

>Not surprising. No arny I am still here.

Where is "here"?

Specifically!

> I thought there was a remote chance that
> you might show some decency and intelegence and do the right thing.

Which I did. I laughed in your face and tried to talk sense to you,
sockpuppet "Wheel".

> You didn't.

Only in the Middius/Weil/Phillips/Atkinsen/sockpuppet wheel dream world.

> I figured why go through the bother of preparing a proper complaint if I
might
> not have to file it.

I told you to file it last month! What a maroon!


> Well the deadline has come and gone and the complaint is
> in the works.

Waste your time and money! See if I care!

[Arny Krueger]

"Socket" > wrote in message
...
> (S888Wheel) wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> >>It's the 23d and sockpuppet "Wheel" is a no-show as predicted.
> >>
> >
> >I guess you simply didn't understand what the 20th deadline meant. Not
> >surprising. No arny I am still here. I thought there was a remote chance
that
> >you might show some decency and intelegence and do the right thing. You
didn't.
> >I figured why go through the bother of preparing a proper complaint if I
might
> >not have to file it. Well the deadline has come and gone and the
complaint is
> >in the works.
>
> I would add that Krueger is wishing for a miracle if he expects papers
> to be issued and delivered to himself on the very same day a complaint
> is submitted. I don't recall Mr Wheeler stating that he would act on
> the day follow his deadline, so he may submit his complaint at his
> convenience, although obviously his case is stronger if it acted upon
> sooner. Krueger should allow a reasonable time (per courts
> jurisdiction) for Mr Wheeler to pursue the case (probably limited to 6
> months to 1 year), and also a reasonable amount of time for the court
> to consider the merits of the case and issue paperwork (28 days - my
> estimate).

Just a lame attempt to drag out a running joke.

Yawn!

[Powell]

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote

> >> You're assuming a "failure to perform" for which there
> >> is no evidence, as of yet.
> >>
> >Yes, I agree that if the paperwork is properly
> >completed to the satisfaction of the clerk it will be
> >recorded as is proper and right... only to die a
> >natural death, *no cause for action*. Is that the
> >victory you seek?
> >
>
> So you're predicting a libel suit will be unsuccessful.
> You probably also feel that any litigation based on
> stuff written on the Internet is non-actionable.
> I don't.
>
Correct.


> In a very real sense, the "victory" you think I seek
> has already been won a long time ago - by Ed
> Shain's thread and the impressive list of real
> individuals (not sockpuppets) listed as targets of
> Krueger's (& McKelvey"s) smear campaigns and
> character assassination.
>
Ed was a real loss to the group.


> Every time these 2 hatemongers are ridiculed
> on RAO, another "victory" takes place. And there
> is a difference, Powell, between the gratuitous
> personal insults these 2 regularly spew, and the
> libelous lies about a person's credentials and/or
> profession that they attempt to spread. It is the
> latter that might be grounds for a libel suit.
>
Maybe, but even that is thin ("person's credentials”
argument) given that the intent of r.a.o. is audio and
not psychology, as in your case. But I do empathize
with you that such outrageous behavior by Arny is
morally wrong, cruel and brutal. But its not actionable
do to the lack of real damages among other things.


> In Scott Wheeler's case, the motivation is different.
>
Scotts motivation is emotional not business based. I
think he like many think that the legal system is forum
for equal justice but it is not. The are no winners
except for the attorneys.


> And perhaps you don't think that John Atkinson would
> have a case either...
>
No, John has a case but only as a plaintive under the
Streophile Publisher umbrella. What real damages
could the magazine demonstrate to warrant $300
hour suites getting involved?


> Scott has received legal advice which hopefully is
> fairly valid - so we'll just have to wait and see what
> happens.
>
Hehehe... you mean his father? If he’s retired he
cannot give legal advice without a license to
practice law in his state.


> >Only if you send money to Scott for legal
> >representation, Bruce :).
> >
> LOL! If any money is sent, it will by Krueger,
> not me. :) Or perhaps, as indicated, Scott
> will settle for a public retraction in RAO by
> Krueger.
>
I do appreciate your humor, Bruce, and your
wishful thinking... that I can endorse :).


> >> The fact that many have chosen to let this
> >> documented liar and libeler get away with his
> >> regular character assassination smears
> >> doesn't mean he hasn't crossed the line. It just
> >> indicates that many simply don't think c-l-K is
> >> worth bothering with.
> >>
> >"get away with"... ultimately what does he get
> >really get away with? Could you quantify those
> >feelings, please?
>
> Of course I can't, as you know. But he has freedom
> of speech here since it's an unmoderated group, as
> you know. He's complained about having his posts
> rejected lately by the moderators at RAHE (part of
> Krueger's latest paranoid conspiracy theory).
>
RAHE... is a run by Brown Shirts.


> And he's always opposed attempts to turn RAO
> into a moderated group as well. Why do you
> suppose that is?
>
I agree with Arny but then I think RAO would fair
better as a educational forum if binaries were
allowed, so there you go.


> Have I lost any business (or has Scot) because of
> this? It's probably impossible to tell. (Same would
> apply for Stereophile, I suppose).
>
Agreed. The court system is ill-suited for satisfying
the complainant unless real damages has occurred.
This is a good thing most of the time.


> >"worth bothering"... all men seek glory... that's
> >a common universal archetype, Bruce :).
> >
> A "victory" over Krueger is hardly what I would call
> "glory". I'd much rather be respected by my colleagues
> and peers - in both my social life and professional life. :)
>
You already have that standing and Arny can’t easily
take that away from you, John, Ed or Scott.


> I trust that Mr. Wheeler will give us an update in the
> near future re. his legal issues with c-l-K.
>
Indeed :).

[Anon E Mouse]

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, S888Wheel wrote:

> >
> >It's the 23d and sockpuppet "Wheel" is a no-show as predicted.
>
> I guess you simply didn't understand what the 20th deadline meant. Not
> surprising. No arny I am still here. I thought there was a remote chance that
> you might show some decency and intelegence and do the right thing. You didn't.
> I figured why go through the bother of preparing a proper complaint if I might
> not have to file it. Well the deadline has come and gone and the complaint is
> in the works.

Waiting for the process server to knock on my door here in Hamburg. [Yawn]

BTW, what are the odds you can show, in the U.S. or elsewhere, you have been
libelled by a message posted to Usenet?
--
Anon E. Mouse