Marc Phillips is a coward

[Lionel Chapuis]

This could explain why Arnold systematically beat his big fat bottom to
jelly in all their confrontation.

Hey "Boon" if you are really sure that Arnold is "molesting children",
or he is dealing in "child pornography" you must do something if not you
are party of the crime (from a normal human being point of view) !
You speak to much easily of such sordid crimes !
Year after year you breaks wind behind your computer, full point... You
stink man.

Never make your move to soon "Boon" life is so dangerous and unpredicable.

Lionel

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel Chapuis said:

>This could explain why Arnold systematically beat his big fat bottom to
>jelly in all their confrontation.


>Hey "Boon" if you are really sure that Arnold is "molesting children",
>or he is dealing in "child pornography" you must do something if not you
>are party of the crime (from a normal human being point of view) !

I already have, and it has been well documented:

Mr. Phillips,

We have received your complaint regarding Mr. Krueger. We are turning your
complaint over to County and/or State authorities to evaluate the
complaint.

James C. Fowler, Deputy Director
Grosse Pointe Woods D.P.S.
20025 Mack Plaza
Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236


>You speak to much easily of such sordid crimes !

No, it's very difficult for me. I want Arny to leave RAO, because every post
of his reminds me of what he said and did here:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arny,+daddy,+fellatio&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&rnum=1

>Year after year you breaks wind behind your computer, full point... You
>stink man.

And you support child pornography.

>
>Never make your move to soon "Boon" life is so dangerous and unpredicable.

Is there a French word for Krooglish?

Boon

[George M. Middius]

Marc Phillips said:

> Is there a French word for Krooglish?

I'm sure "le Kroopologiste" is easily grasped by Lionel le Retard.

[Lionel Chapuis]

Marc Phillips a écrit :

>
> I already have, and it has been well documented:
>
> Mr. Phillips,
>
> We have received your complaint regarding Mr. Krueger. We are turning your
> complaint over to County and/or State authorities to evaluate the
> complaint.
>
> James C. Fowler, Deputy Director
> Grosse Pointe Woods D.P.S.
> 20025 Mack Plaza
> Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236
>
>
>
Any date ?

> No, it's very difficult for me. I want Arny to leave RAO, because every post
> of his reminds me of what he said and did here:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arny,+daddy,+fellatio&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
> safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
>
Your link drive me to a message from Arnold requiering explantion from
the group...
>
> And you support child pornography.
>
Surely no ! But I don't like your way of joking and your general
behaviour on RAO coward !

Lionel

[George M. Middius]

Lionel Chapuis said:

> Surely no ! But I don't like your way of joking and your general
> behaviour on RAO coward !

Shut up, McInturd. You're the crap even Krooger leaves in the bowl.

[Jacob Kramer]

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:33:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>There's no evidence that I am the author of this vile text. Phillips can't
>prove that he didn't author it, and given his fascination with it, it is
>likely that he is its author.

I'll tell you what there's no proof of, there's no proof that anyone
on this newsgroup sent that to you. Yet you keep repeating it over
and over and over again. This is, in other words, an unproven
accusation. If you have some sort of evidence, send it to the police
and press charges. Or complain to some sort of civic organization or
self-help group. Otherwise keep it off RAO.

--

Jacob Kramer

[George M. Middius]

Jacob Kramer said:

> Or complain to some sort of civic organization or
> self-help group.

Are there really self-help groups for giant walking turds that are
masochistic, child-molesting, compulsive liars? Amazing.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jacob Kramer" > wrote in message

> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:33:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>> There's no evidence that I am the author of this vile text. Phillips
>> can't prove that he didn't author it, and given his fascination with
>> it, it is likely that he is its author.
>
> I'll tell you what there's no proof of, there's no proof that anyone
> on this newsgroup sent that to you.

There's no proof that someone on this newsgroup didn't send it to me. And
the liklihood is high that someone on this newsgroup did send it to me.
Opportunity, motive...

> Yet you keep repeating it over and over and over again.

Well Kramer, where are your complaints about all the times that Phillips
repeats it? There aren't any, which shows your prejudice, hypocracy bias and
general bad faith.

> This is, in other words, an unproven accusation.

Again Kramer, where are your complaints about all the times that Phillips
makes his unprove accustaion? There aren't any, which shows your prejudice,
hypocracy bias and general bad faith.

> If you have some sort of evidence, send it to the police
> and press charges.

For what?

> Or complain to some sort of civic organization or self-help group.


>Otherwise keep it off RAO.

Kramer, tell that to your good buddy Marc Phillips who brings this up again
and again and again. If it was up to me, it would have died years ago.

BTW Kramer, thanks for showing your bad faith by bringing these accusations
up yet one more time.

What a maroon!

[Arny Krueger]

"Girth" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>>> I'll tell you what there's no proof of, there's no proof that anyone
>>> on this newsgroup sent that to you.
>>
>> There's no proof that someone on this newsgroup didn't send it to me.
>
> It's not possible to prove a negative.

That's an incorrect generality.

> Pleading ignorance on this
> point by repeating the above line just shows what an idiot you are.

Stumbling over this point which I covered here recently, shows Dormer that
you have mastered the art of acting like an idiot, even after recently
receiving proper instruction.

How do you prove a negative?

Here's and example. It is known that one of two people did something. If one
of them did it, the other most certainly did not do it. An example of this
would be winning a race. If you win a race, I didn't. So how do I prove the
negative hypothesis that I didn't win the race? I prove that you won the
race.

Doooh!

> What is known is that you claimed to have received offensive
> text/graphics, and accused one person after the next [in this
> newsgroup] of perpetrated said crime without demonstrating a shred of
> evidence that your claim was based in fact, rather than just some
> fabricated story you dreamed up whilst doing god knows what.

Prove it. In the process you'll find that your story here is erroneous.

> You claimed to have the materials in your possession (including the kiddy
> pics) so why didn't you clear your name?

Why do I need to clear my name of passively receiving some nasty pictures?
Obviously, I don't.

>Why don't you do that now?

I don't have to clear my name of passively receiving nasty email.

> Could it be that you are guilty as sin.

Could it be that you are full of crap?

> By the way, since you mentioned motivation.. you have this track
> record of attacking individuals indiscriminately, and acting out some
> weird mental and behavioral problems on the internet.

Prove it.

> Why should the
> good folks of rec.audio.opinion believe you [proven, documented,
> compulsive liar that you are] when you lash out and accuse the very
> people you attack on a daily basis of committing a serious crime?

OK, don't believe me. And BTW Dormer continue to bring this nasty little
story up again and again because it makes you somehow feel good. Let RAO
remain the armpit of Usenet. Live in a sewer. See if I give a hang.

> It's not a pretty picture. LOT'#s!

Right, and its just another example of what an armpit you've made of RAO,
Dormer.

[Shit-for-Brains]

In message >,
skocpuppet "Girth" wrote:

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> I'll tell you what there's no proof of, there's no proof that anyone
> >> on this newsgroup sent that to you.
> >
> >There's no proof that someone on this newsgroup didn't send it to me.
>
> It's not possible to prove a negative. Pleading ignorance on this
> point by repeating the above line just shows what an idiot you are.
>

Its like I'm gonig to proove anything to a sockpuppet named, for his
wasteline. ;-)


> What is known is that you claimed to have recieved offensive
> text/graphics, and accused one person after the next [in this
> newsgroup] of perpetrated said crime without demonstrating a shred of
> evidence that your claim was based in fact, rather than jsut some
> fabricated story you dreamed up whilst doing god knows what.

Its typical of a "toob" biggot to mention God because you know I'm a
faithful Christian sockpuppet "Girth". In fact this just shows your
hypocracy again and again sockpuppet "Girth". If I were a betting man the
odds would be longer than a donkeys d*ck that you are the author of those
despicable, horrible, detailed pictures I happened to have on my computer,
once. Do you have any dead children sockpuppet "Girth"? I must be joking to
ask a nonexistent person that question! ;-)



> claimed to have the materials in your possession (including the kiddy
> pics) so why didn't you clear your name? Why don't you do that now?
> Could it be that you are guilty as sin.

Just can't stop the religious attacks now can you sockpupeet "Grith"? Prove
you didn't send me the pictures. Prove you didn't mutilate that young man's
nipples. Its like I can build an igloo, with all the proof I get from
Atkinsons' soldiers.


>
> By the way, since you mentioned motivation.. you have this track
> record of attacking individuals indiscriminantly, and acting out some
> weird mental and behavioural problems on the internet. Why should the
> good folks of rec.audio.opinion believe you [proven, documented,
> compulsive liar that you are] when you lash out and accuse the very
> people you attack on a daily basis of committing a serious crime?
>

Sockpuppet "Girth" when you can post a bank statement showing you are who
you say you are. The truth is that that truth is an indefeatible defense
against libel. But you wouldn't know that would you sockppupet "GIrth"?
Since nobody has proved they didn't send me the naked pictures with males in
various staites of arowsal its like I don't have a subscription to a
pornographic service. Some of the pictures didn't even show what race or
religion the males are. Would you pay money for a mixture of races, like
that? Only a proven liar would deny that! LOt"S! ;-)

;-(


> It's not a pretty picture. LOT'#s!

[tor b]

>
>This could explain why Arnold systematically beat his big fat bottom to
>jelly in all their confrontation.
>
>Hey "Boon" if you are really sure that Arnold is "molesting children",
>or he is dealing in "child pornography" you must do something if not you
>are party of the crime (from a normal human being point of view) !
>You speak to much easily of such sordid crimes !
>Year after year you breaks wind behind your computer, full point... You
>stink man.
>
>Never make your move to soon "Boon" life is so dangerous and unpredicable.
>


Lionel - You quit kissing up to Arny.

[dave weil]

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:10:51 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"Girth" > wrote in message

>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>>> I'll tell you what there's no proof of, there's no proof that anyone
>>>> on this newsgroup sent that to you.
>>>
>>> There's no proof that someone on this newsgroup didn't send it to me.
>>
>> It's not possible to prove a negative.
>
>That's an incorrect generality.

So, you were incorrect when you said:

"Not at all. You and I know that you can't prove a negative
hypothesis".

<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=krueger+%22prove+a+negative%22+group:rec. audio.opinion&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=VzIE5.786%24ln6.114512%40news.flash.net&rnum=7>

I guess you're calling Tom Nousiane incorrect as well, because he said
this:

"Oh bull****. Of course you can't prove a negative".

<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=krueger+%22prove+a+negative%22+group:rec. audio.opinion&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=19990622011947.25664.00004321%40ng-cg1.aol.com&rnum=13>

Of course, Mr. McKelvy thinks that you are a dishonest little ****,
Arnold.

"Excellent, you prove once again that you can't discuss anything
honestly. Asking someone to prove a negative, what a dishonest little
****".
<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=krueger+%22prove+a+negative%22+group:rec. audio.opinion&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=395e522e%40flexnet239.uunt.net&rnum=15>

Poor Arnold...

[Jacob Kramer]

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:48:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>There's no proof that someone on this newsgroup didn't send it to me.

This is impossible to prove, other than by finding the real author.

>> Yet you keep repeating it over and over and over again.
>
>Well Kramer, where are your complaints about all the times that Phillips
>repeats it?

You introduced the issue into RAO and transmitted that pornographic
text to thousands of servers and PCs. This is _your_ topic. You are
responsible for it being here, where it doesn't belong, even if
someone sent it to you privately.

--

Jacob Kramer

[Lionel Chapuis]

tor b a écrit :

> Lionel - You quit kissing up to Arny.

Sorry I don't understand "you quit kissing up" my english is so poor.
Could you please explain.

Thanks
Lionel

[Arny Krueger]

"Leon North" > wrote in message


> Turdy "Biggest Pussy On Usenet" Krooogles hallucinates LOt"s:

Let's review the facts:

Is North man enough to post under his legal name?

Nope.

Is North man enough to post from a valid tracable IP address?

Nope.

Is North man enough to give his true legal address?

Nope.

North is afraid of his own words. Read on if you want to see what North is
afraid of:

>> "Jacob Kramer" > wrote in message
>>

>>> You introduced the issue into RAO and transmitted that pornographic
>>> text to thousands of servers and PCs.

>> The issue was introduced to RAO by the person or persons who created
>> the perverted email and sent it to me.

Furhtermore, the kind of filthy and repulsive ideas in that email were
previously expressed on RAO by people like sockpuppets Middius and Graham
Briggs.

> This may be the single most asinine claim you've ever made.

Wrong Leon. BTW, are you the person who created the perverted email? Did you
help disguise it's origin, as you disguised the origin of this post?

> It's a matter of record that +you+ posted it on RAO.

I was not its author.

> You have zero proof
> that +anybody+ on RAO sent you anything.

You have zero proof that it wasn't sent to me. In fact Leon, given how vile
you are, and your great interest in it, there's good chance that you are
its author.

> AAMOF it couldn't even have been sent.

Just shows how wrong you are, Leon. It was sent to me, along with a fair
amount of other filthy pictures, in the same time frame. I figure that
someone decided that if they sent me enough crap like that, I'd leave RAO.

> That is the core of my wager with you which you have been
> ignoring and snipping.

There is no wager, Leon. You have provided me with no proof that you have
control of the type of funds you've mentioned. As the intiator of these
alleged bets, it is your responsibility to prove your credibility.

> Prove it.

Prove that you exist, Leon. Send me your legal name and address by private
email.

> Stop with the bleating and whining
> and crying and posturing and just prove it.

Prove that you exist, Leon. Send me your legal name and address by private
email.

>This is notwithstanding
> the fact that you are the same idiot who, for years, thought that a
> post and an email were the same thing.

Prove that you exist, Leon. Send me your legal name and address by private
email.


> Prove that there is another post with the same content predating this
one:
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arny,+daddy,+fellatio&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&s
afe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&rnum=1

Taht would be your responsibility since it is your claim, Leon.

> You can't.

I don't need to.

> You lose. Again.

OK David Weil, why are you posting as Leon North?

> And you are once again proven to be a
> ****ing liar, slanderer, pedophile and a pussy.

Gee Leon, you really got that credibility thing down pat, don't you?

Why don't you ask me to commit suicide as well?

> Your +argument+ has
> been officially deconstructed.

Not here, not anywhere.

How much is Atkinson paying you to attack me like this, sockpuppet "Leon".
Or, are you just one of Atkinson's sockpuppets? Given that he supports
people like Phillips, it's likely that he is involved as well, I think.

> You brought that garbage to usenet.

Not at all, Leon. The origin of the lies that were reflected in that filthy
email were earlier posts on RAO by sockpuppets Middius and Graham. I suspect
that they are co-conspirators with Gindi and Atkinson.

> Now live with it, retard.

How can you live with all these lies, sockpuppet North?

>>> This is _your_ topic.

>> No its [sic] not. It's the topic of the perverts like Phillips and
>> North and yourself [sic] Kramer, who keep bringing it up again and
>> again. I'd be happy to
>> let it drop, but you guys just can't leave it along [sic], now can
>> you?

> I'm sure that you'd be delighted to let it drop, **** head.

Hey, why live with such filth?

> The
> problem is that you keeping digging the hole deeper by not accepting
> the blame and responsibility for it being on RAO.

The basic filth was introduced to RAO by Graham and Middius, which can be
proven by retrievals from google. I

>This is a simple
> thing (even simpler than you). Every time you blame others for this
> you will find it coming right back in your lap.

How am I to blame for the filth that Graham and Middius posted on RAO of
their own free will?

How am I to blame for your filth, sockpuppet "North"?

> Your abysmal
> stupidity is the root cause for your problems in this regard.


No it's not. I may not be the smartest person in the world, but Graham,
Middius and others bear the responsibility for their own actions, no matter
what you say.

> It
> won't go away and you are filling up the archives with more and more
> proof of what sick liar you are (and a stupid one, too).

Sockpuppet North, do you deny all the filthy posts by Middius and Graham? Do
you deny the recent filthy postings by sockpuppet "Bustenhalter"?

>>> You are
>>> responsible for it being here, where it doesn't belong, even if
>>> someone sent it to you privately.

>> Wrong Kramer. The perverts who created this filth are the ones who
>> are responsible for its existence. By sending it to me under the
>> given circumstances, they virtually ensured its wider dissemination.

> Puzzle me this, eggspurt: how does more than one person send a single
> email?

They work together to collect and write it. More than one peice was sent.

<You've blamed so many different people for this piece of trash
> that they must've flown in from all over the world to do a conference
> email to you from 'hate R-neee central'. Right? And you say you are
> a computer eggspurt? Right. Do you ever cringe when you see how
> stupid you make yourself look?

I think you are one of the insiders in this mess sockpuppet North. Why don't
you explain how you did it? I think you keep bringing this up again and
again to get more milage out of your filthy work.

>> Kramer, you're probably part of the conspiracy behind all this filth
>> that litters RAO.

> Going off the deep end again, Turdy? Hearing voices in your head?

North, something that goes on this long, this often doesn't come out of
nowhere.

>> You are yourself quite perverted, attacking me [sic] the victim
>> [sic] and not attacking perverts like Phillips, Middius and Dormer
>> who keep demanding absolutely horrific things like that [sic] I
>> commit suicide.

> What's so horrific about that?

Thanks for discrediting yourself again.

> There are many who agree with that sentiment.

There are a lot of really sick people in the world, I guess.

> You want horrific? How about your response to one of my
> posts wherein you asked me to hire somebody to off you?

That would be your misinterpretation of what was written, sockpuppet North.

> Can't you do anything for yourself? BTW, you may include me in that
group. I
> think it is a stellar idea.

I think you're a really sick puppy, sockpuppet North.

>When you do it, would you credit us with
> the idea? We could get the Nobel Prize (unless you **** up as you do
> with most everything else).

>> Heck, I think you're part of the conspiracy because you are aiding
>> and abetting it by taking their side and attacking me.

> Conspiracy? Oooooh. This is big. Hold the presses. Aren't you
> bright enough to realize that this contributory evidence that you are
> loathed, despised and reviled?

Given the nature of the people who loath and revile me, that would be the
good news. The whole lot of you are sorry excuses for human beings.

>Conspiracy? Nope. It's +reaction+ to your repugnant self.

Nice try at trying to avoid responsibility for your vile nature, sockpuppet
North.

> You remain skull ****ingly stupid.*

If you think that posts like this are smart, then I'm happy to be stupid in
your eyes, sockpuppet North.

[dave weil]

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:09:39 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>> You lose. Again.
>
>OK David Weil, why are you posting as Leon North?

I'm not. And never have.

Feel free to fling your accusations if you wish, but it makes you no
better than the behavior that you complain about on RAO.

<shrug>

[George M. Middius]

Yesterday, the Big Liar From **** Mountain claimed this:

"Atkinson, anybody with a brain knows that I refer to people by
their last name, friend, foe and neutral party alike."

Today, however, once confronted with the stench of his own rotting
lies, the Big **** reverts to the first name form of address:

> Wrong Leon.
> Just shows how wrong you are, Leon.
> There is no wager, Leon.
> Prove that you exist, Leon.
> Prove that you exist, Leon.
> Prove that you exist, Leon.
> it is your claim, Leon.


Here, Stupidhead goes off on the obligatory paranoid tangent:

> OK David Weil, why are you posting as Leon North?

> Not at all, Leon. The origin of the lies that were reflected in that filthy
> email were earlier posts on RAO by sockpuppets Middius and Graham.

(Note the plentiful evidence Turdborg supplies to substantiate this
accusation.)

> I suspect that they are co-conspirators with Gindi and Atkinson.

I'll bet the vintages of these "conspiracies" you keep uncovering
coincide neatly with the first time you were diagnosed as mentally
unstable.


> The basic filth was introduced to RAO by Graham and Middius, which can be
> proven by retrievals from google.

> How am I to blame for the filth that Graham and Middius posted on RAO of
> their own free will?

At this point, ****borg's pathology has allowed him to accept his
own random lies as Received Truth. Henceforth, he will refer to
these lies as "proven facts".


Finally, after bloviating like an overstuffed outhouse,
****-for-Brains grasps at the straws of reality, if only briefly.

> I may not be the smartest person in the world

There now, Arnii, was that so difficult to admit?

Watch out for low-hanging beams.

[Arny Krueger]

"Leon North" > from hiding behind a Hotmail account
spewed in message

>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
Turdy "Pansy" Krooogles goes
evasive:


>> "Leon North" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>> Turdy "Biggest Pussy On Usenet" Krooogles hallucinates LOt"s:
>>
>> Let's review the facts:
>>
>> Is North man enough to post under his legal name?

> Yup

Where?

>> Is North man enough to post from a valid tracable [sic] IP address?

> Yup

Where?


>> Is North man enough to give his true legal address?

> Yup

Where?


>> North is afraid of his own words.

And you've posted this information where, sockpuppet North?

[Leon North]

Turdy "May I Feltch You" Kroogles out gases:

> And you've posted this information where, sockpuppet North?

http://www.google.com/

Now let's address your konsummate kowardice, kroo. Here it is again:

BTW, given that you won't take my wager for money, how would you feel about
changing the stakes? Instead of money, let's do it for presence on RAO. You
win, I leave and never post here again. You lose, you leave and never post
here again. I'll even sweeten the pot with a complete retraction of
+everything+ negative I've ever said about you and give you my personal info.
AAMOF I wouldn't be surprised if many of your other tormentors and adversaries
jump on the wagon to +really+ sweeten the stakes. Are you game?

Well? Are you going to go hide behind your couch yet again? You spout off and
make claims that you can't back up. This is known as letting your ass overload
your mouth. WIll you no-show yet again? Lookin' lame here, Turdy, lookin'
lame. If you avoid this again then I'll see it as your surrender. Are you
going to lose? Again? <s******-chuckle>

Smell the fear.

You remain stumble bum stupid.*

I remain,

The Shadow

*more variety

--
"If I was worried about people thinking I was a prick, I would have never
invented ABX." A. Dimbulb Kroooger

[Arny Krueger]

"Leon North" > demonstrated his cowardice in
message


"Arny Krueger" > again pointed out North's incredible
weakness in message


>> And you've posted this information where, sockpuppet North?

> http://www.google.com/

Sockpuppet North takes the coward's way out!

Gosh, why am I not surprised?

Thanks sockpuppet North for showing your consummate cowardice again and
again.

[dave weil]

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 13:08:39 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"Leon North" > demonstrated his cowardice in
>message

>
>"Arny Krueger" > again pointed out North's incredible
>weakness in message

>
>>> And you've posted this information where, sockpuppet North?
>
>> http://www.google.com/
>
>Sockpuppet North takes the coward's way out!
>
>Gosh, why am I not surprised?
>
>Thanks sockpuppet North for showing your consummate cowardice again and
>again.

Well, it's a tactic that you've used before, right Mr. Krueger?

[Leon North]

Turdy "May I Feltch You" Krooogles accepts defeat:

Non-response to several offers duly noted, Turdy. Your surrender and
admission of guilt is accepted. You are not able to do what you claimed
and have collapsed in abject fear and loss. This way didn't cost you any
money so I understand. Credibility is gone forever, however. Nate would
be proud of you, not.

You lose.

Again.

You remain a devastatingly stupid, lying, cowardly pederast.*

I remain,

The Shadow

*more variety

--
"For every logical sane thing you say, Arnie will come back with at least
one, and usually two or three stark-raving tangential, illogical, insane
responses." mmg - psych

[Arny Krueger]

"Leon North" > wrote in message



Let's review the facts:

Is North man enough to post under his legal name?

Nope.

Is North man enough to post from a valid tracable IP address?

Nope.

Is North man enough to give his true legal address?

Nope.

Is North man enough to back up his bets with proof that he has access to
that kind of money?

Nope.

[John Atkinson]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>...
> How much is Atkinson paying you to attack me like this, sockpuppet
> "Leon".

As I just wrote in another posting, Mr. Krueger, I do not pay anyone to
"attack" you. That you believe I head a conspiracy to defame you is both
a disturbingly revealing admission on your part and defamatory,
considering that I am in some limited way a public figure. You may be
in pain, but I must request you please to refrain from posting such
comments.

> Or, are you just one of Atkinson's sockpuppets?

You have my word that I do not run "sockpuppets," Mr. Krueger. Every
post I make to the audio newsgroups is clearly identified as being by me
and includes my correct e-mail address, spam harvesters be damned.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

"The discussion is what I meant, not what I said." -- Arny Krueger

[Anon E Mouse]

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Leon North wrote:

> Turdy "May I Felch You For A Quarter?" Krooogles dissembles famously:
>
> > Is North man enough to post under his legal name?
>
> Yes. Too bad you're not really a komputer eggspurt.
>
> > Is North man enough to post from a valid tracable [sic] (you keep using
> > this "word" but its meaning is what? Did you run out of commas again?) IP
> > address?
>
> Yes. Too bad you don't know how this stuff works or how to spell the words
> or write lucid sentences. That tech stuff are a bitch for you, eh?
>
> > Is North man enough to give his true legal address?
>
> Yes. Too bad you're so inept and stupid.
>
> > Is North man enough to back up his bets with proof that he has access to
> > that kind of money?
>
> Yes. It's all been offered by me and declined by you, pussy. Say, why
> don't you demand the same of your anonymous kroopologists? Hypocrisy?
> Duplicity? Dishonesty? All of these? But of course. Hey, maybe McInt[yre]
> can come to your rescue! Haha. It's a joke. [...]

En effet, je me bidonne pas mal... >>>8->


> The Shadow

Pensée magique.
--
Anon E. Mouse

[Playing] "I Cover The Waterfront" - The Susie Arioli Swing Band

[Arny Krueger]

"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
m
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> >...
>> How much is Atkinson paying you to attack me like this, sockpuppet
>> "Leon".
>
> As I just wrote in another posting, Mr. Krueger, I do not pay anyone
> to "attack" you. That you believe I head a conspiracy to defame you
> is both a disturbingly revealing admission on your part and
> defamatory, considering that I am in some limited way a public
> figure. You may be in pain, but I must request you please to refrain
> from posting such comments.
>
>> Or, are you just one of Atkinson's sockpuppets?
>
> You have my word that I do not run "sockpuppets," Mr. Krueger.

OK, I've got nothing. What next?

> Every
> post I make to the audio newsgroups is clearly identified as being by
> me and includes my correct e-mail address, spam harvesters be damned.

Yeah, sure.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Anon E Mouse" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> En effet, je me bidonne pas mal... >>>8->
>
>

Lei sono un'iena regolare




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[dave weil]

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:30:39 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
m
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> >...
>>> How much is Atkinson paying you to attack me like this, sockpuppet
>>> "Leon".
>>
>> As I just wrote in another posting, Mr. Krueger, I do not pay anyone
>> to "attack" you. That you believe I head a conspiracy to defame you
>> is both a disturbingly revealing admission on your part and
>> defamatory, considering that I am in some limited way a public
>> figure. You may be in pain, but I must request you please to refrain
>> from posting such comments.
>>
>>> Or, are you just one of Atkinson's sockpuppets?
>>
>> You have my word that I do not run "sockpuppets," Mr. Krueger.
>
>OK, I've got nothing. What next?
>
>> Every
>> post I make to the audio newsgroups is clearly identified as being by
>> me and includes my correct e-mail address, spam harvesters be damned.
>
>Yeah, sure.

This just shows Arnold Krueger in his true light. Make unsubstantiated
charges simply because he can.

It's going to cost him in the future though...

[Lionel Chapuis]

Girth a écrit :

<snip>

Who autorized you to change the subject of my message ?

Lionel

[George M. Middius]

Lionel Chapuis said:

> Who autorized you to change the subject of my message ?

On s'authorise de faire ca parce que c'est toi le plus grand floater.

[Marc Phillips]

Arny said:

>You are yourself quite perverted, attacking me the victim and
>not attacking perverts like Phillips, Middius and Dormer who keep demanding
>absolutely horrific things like that I commit suicide.

I've never demanded that you commit suicide. I've only gently suggested it.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel Chapuis said:

>Marc Phillips a écrit :
>
>>
>> I already have, and it has been well documented:
>>
>> Mr. Phillips,
>>
>> We have received your complaint regarding Mr. Krueger. We are turning your
>> complaint over to County and/or State authorities to evaluate the
>> complaint.
>>
>> James C. Fowler, Deputy Director
>> Grosse Pointe Woods D.P.S.
>> 20025 Mack Plaza
>> Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236
>>
>>
>>
>Any date ?
>
>> No, it's very difficult for me. I want Arny to leave RAO, because every
>post
>> of his reminds me of what he said and did here:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arny,+daddy,+fellatio&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
>> safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
>>
>Your link drive me to a message from Arnold requiering explantion from
>the group...
>>
>> And you support child pornography.
>>
>Surely no ! But I don't like your way of joking and your general
>behaviour on RAO coward !
>

Well, I'd challenge you to a duel on my front lawn, but it's been in the
nineties here, so I'm sure you'd drop dead before I could load my pistol.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Arny, can't you change a subject header ONCE without ****ing it up with a typo?

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel Chapuis said:

>Marc Phillips a écrit :
>
>> Well, I'd challenge you to a duel on my front lawn, but it's been in the
>> nineties here, so I'm sure you'd drop dead before I could load my pistol.
>>
>> Boon
>>
>>
>
>Life is not a western movie...
>You'd better challenge yourself to improve your behaviour, little boon.
>It will avoid you that adults slap your big fat bottom while you are
>looking for water for your pistol.

Is that what you like to do, run around and spank children on their bottoms
while they fill their water pistols? No wonder you champion a pederast like
Arny Krueger.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Arny said:

>Kramer, tell that to your good buddy Marc Phillips who brings this up again
>and again and again.

Funny thing, though...I've been gone for the last few days, and others picked
up the slack in the effort to let everyone on Usenet know that there's a
pedophile among us, and that pedophile's name is Arny Krueger, and that he
lives on 1600 Prestwick, in Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan.

The only reason why I've repeated your monstrosities over and over is because
you're surprisingly still here, acting as if you've never done anything wrong.
I know you've been hoping this would blow over, and that everyone would
eventually forget about your gaffe, your sickness, and your perversions.
Obviously that's not going to happen.


If it was up to me, it would have died years ago.
>

Oh, I don't blame you for wanting to take back the biggest tactical blunder in
the history of RAO, and possibly Usenet. It all comes down to two
possibilities, that either you're a pederast, or you'd rather be known as a
pederast than a liar, which underlines your magnificent stupidity.

I'll make you a deal, though. Admit you manufactured the e-mail in question,
and I'll never call you a pederast, or a child pornographer, or a pedophile
again. (Of course I'll continue to call you a liar, a hypocrite, a failure,
and a coward. Acts of contrition on your part will help alleviate this,
however.)

Boon

[Lionel Chapuis]

Marc Phillips a écrit :
> Lionel Chapuis said:
>
>
>>Marc Phillips a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>Is that what you like to do, run around and spank children on their bottoms
>>>while they fill their water pistols? No wonder you champion a pederast
>>>like Arny Krueger.
>>>
>>
>>You are right little worm ! But as I am mono-maniac I will focuse only on YOUR big fat bottom.
>
> Great. Arny's turning this place into rec.audio.pedophile.
>
> Boon
>
You're right again ! But be careful little worm this will be painful !

This is your ass today : (_._)
This will be your ass after I'll find you : (__o__)

(Thanks to Magaret for the graphics)

Lionel

[GeoSynch]

Leon North danced a jig:

> > Is North man enough to post under his legal name?

> Yup

> > Is North man enough to post from a valid tracable [sic] IP address?

> Yup

> > Is North man enough to give his true legal address?

> Yup

Sorry Leon, but the jig is up:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22Leon+North%22+NY&btnG=Google+Search&pb=f

If you're too lazy to click on the link, this is what it returns:

Leon B North Jr - (518) 686-0818 - 51 Church St, Hoosick Falls, NY 12090

There's more, look for driver # 21 in this link:
http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:Kv0juT1JkJMJ:www.lebanonvalley.com/00Rosters/street00.htm+Hoosick+Falls+%22Leon+North%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8

You remain shadowy no more.


GeoSynch

[Leon North]

Girth wrote:

> "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> >Sorry Leon, but the jig is up:
> >http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22Leon+North%22+NY&btnG=Google+Search&pb=f
> >
> >If you're too lazy to click on the link, this is what it returns:
> >
> >Leon B North Jr - (518) 686-0818 - 51 Church St, Hoosick Falls, NY 12090
> >
> >There's more, look for driver # 21 in this link:
> >http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:Kv0juT1JkJMJ:www.lebanonvalley.com/00Rosters/street00.htm+Hoosick+Falls+%22Leon+North%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8
> >
> >You remain shadowy no more.
>
> Excellent detective work! ;-)
>
> He's got you sussed Leon...

Darn. Is nothing sacred? Well, now that Geo, the scion of the Hamilton brain trust, has posted these facts, one wonders if Turdy's head will explode or
if the kristian-krooô will be compelled to accept my wager. Kwestions, kwestions. Please note that I was +not+ labeled with an "R".

I remain,

LN

--
"Admittedly I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer." A. Dimbulb Krooger (,)--missing comma

[Marc Phillips]

Girth said:

>"GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
>>> > Is North man enough to post under his legal name?
>>
>>> Yup
>>
>>> > Is North man enough to post from a valid tracable [sic] IP address?
>>
>>> Yup
>>
>>> > Is North man enough to give his true legal address?
>>
>>> Yup
>>
>>Sorry Leon, but the jig is up:
>
>>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22Leon+North%22+
NY&btnG=Google+Search&pb=f
>>
>>If you're too lazy to click on the link, this is what it returns:
>>
>>Leon B North Jr - (518) 686-0818 - 51 Church St, Hoosick Falls, NY 12090
>>
>>There's more, look for driver # 21 in this link:
>
>>http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:Kv0juT1JkJMJ:www.lebanonvalley.com/
00Rosters/street00.htm+Hoosick+Falls+%22Leon+North%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8
>>
>>You remain shadowy no more.
>
>
>Excellent detective work! ;-)
>
>He's got you sussed Leon...

Except that I know where Leon lives, and it ain't anywhere near the East Coast.

Boon

[Leon North]

Marc Phillips wrote:

> Except that I know where Leon lives, and it ain't anywhere near the East Coast.

You are correct. One cannot see the East Coast from Hoosick Falls :•)

BTW, I have some new music for you.

LN

--
"Admittedly I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer." A. Dimbulb Krooger

[GeoSynch]

Dormer warbled:

> >> >You remain shadowy no more.

> >> Excellent detective work! ;-)

> >> He's got you sussed Leon...

> >Thanks, doofus, for inadvertently acknowledging that
> >"Leon North" is a sockpuppet. Ahhh-ha-ha-ha! :-)

> I have done no such thing.

Prove it!


GeoSynch

[George M. Middius]

Girth said to StynchBlob:

> >Thanks, doofus, for inadvertently acknowledging that
> >"Leon North" is a sockpuppet. Ahhh-ha-ha-ha! :-)
>
> I have done no such thing.

Don't you love anonymous troublemakers claiming to have
identities?

[GeoSynch]

Pudginski buttinski-ed:


> Don't you love anonymous troublemakers claiming to have
> identities?

Go flirt with Singh, screwball.


GeoSynch

[George M. Middius]

StynchBlob said:

> > Don't you love anonymous troublemakers claiming to have
> > identities?
>
> Go flirt with Singh, screwball.

Which diet are you on now, butterball?

[GeoSynch]

Pudge masticated:

> > > Don't you love anonymous troublemakers claiming to have
> > > identities?

> > Go flirt with Singh, screwball.

> Which diet are you on now, butterball?

None whatsoever. How 'bout you, fatso?


GeoSynch

[tor b]

>
>Except that I know where Leon lives, and it ain't anywhere near the East
>Coast.
>

Liar.

[tor b]

>
>You are correct. One cannot see the East Coast from Hoosick Falls :•)
>
>BTW, I have some new music for you.
>


big whoop.

you don't even know who I am yes.

[tor b]

>
>Cool. I don't think you have my new address, though.
>
>I'll e-mail it to you!
>

You didn't have to move on my account.

How's the diet going?

[GeoSynch]

Pudge twisted its amorphous bulbous self into a pretzel:

> > > Which diet are you on now, butterball?

> > None whatsoever. How 'bout you, fatso?

> Didn't I just see a post from some anonymous asshole that
> consisted of a single line such as "I know you are etc."? If I
> read it, you must have read it. Oh wait -- that was you wrote it,
> wasn't it, psychopath?

Only a braindead slug such as yourself could draw such a parallel.


GeoSynch

[George M. Middius]

StynchBlob attempts to Kroogerize reality.

> > > > Which diet are you on now, butterball?
>
> > > None whatsoever. How 'bout you, fatso?
>
> > Didn't I just see a post from some anonymous asshole that
> > consisted of a single line such as "I know you are etc."? If I
> > read it, you must have read it. Oh wait -- that was you wrote it,
> > wasn't it, psychopath?
>
> Only a braindead slug such as yourself could draw such a parallel.

I can believe that to a Jesus-worshiping troglodyte such as
yourself, the shades of difference among your vast lexicon of
IKYABWAIs are as obvious as the stench of urine in your hovel is
to a regular person.

Now quit trying to fornicate with that electrical outlet and go
back to your real career of staking out ATMs.

[GeoSynch]

Pudge is on a roll:

> > > > > Which diet are you on now, butterball?

> > > > None whatsoever. How 'bout you, fatso?

> > > Didn't I just see a post from some anonymous asshole that
> > > consisted of a single line such as "I know you are etc."? If I
> > > read it, you must have read it. Oh wait -- that was you wrote it,
> > > wasn't it, psychopath?

> > Only a braindead slug such as yourself could draw such a parallel.

> I can believe that to a Jesus-worshiping troglodyte such as
> yourself, the shades of difference among your vast lexicon of
> IKYABWAIs are as obvious as the stench of urine in your hovel is
> to a regular person.

> Now quit trying to fornicate with that electrical outlet and go
> back to your real career of staking out ATMs.

Ho-hum.


GeoSynch

[Lionel Chapuis]

Marc Phillips a écrit :

> Leon North said:
>
>
>>Marc Phillips wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Except that I know where Leon lives, and it ain't anywhere near the East
>>
>>Coast.
>>
>>You are correct. One cannot see the East Coast from Hoosick Falls :•)
>>
>>BTW, I have some new music for you.
>
>
> Cool. I don't think you have my new address, though.
>
> I'll e-mail it to you!
>
> Boon
>
>
"Jurassic Park V" or "The T-Rex's Return"
Ooops, sorry it's not the good thread !
;-)

[tor b]

>
>Ho-hum.
>

weak.