View Full Version : What are your hobbies?
Margaret von B.
July 6th 05, 12:32 AM
Aside from audio and music, that is.
Mine are:
collecting art
cooking
biking - mountain and road
and recently...BOATING :-)
Cheers,
Margaret
George M. Middius
July 6th 05, 12:41 AM
Margaret von B. said:
> Aside from audio and music, that is.
>
> Mine are:
>
> collecting art
> cooking
> biking - mountain and road
> and recently...BOATING :-)
I like movies, swimming, hunting, and destructive carnival games.
George M. Middius
July 6th 05, 12:41 AM
and golf, although I'm not very good.
Clyde Slick
July 6th 05, 12:51 AM
"Margaret von B." > wrote in message
.. .
> Aside from audio and music, that is.
>
> Mine are:
>
> collecting art
> cooking
> biking - mountain and road
> and recently...BOATING :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Margaret
>
I'll include music anyway...playing and singing blues, rock and r&b, mostly
blues
Favorites are Peter Green, Sleepy John Estes, Otis Rush, Willie Dixon, Mike
Bloomfield.
Other than that, travel.
So Maggie V., tell us about your art collecting.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Margaret von B. wrote:
> Aside from audio and music, that is.
>
> Mine are:
>
> collecting art
> cooking
> biking - mountain and road
> and recently...BOATING :-)
>
>
You forgot cyber-transvestism, Mags. ;-)
Margaret von B.
July 6th 05, 02:38 AM
"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Margaret von B." > wrote in message
> .. .
>> Aside from audio and music, that is.
>>
>> Mine are:
>>
>> collecting art
>> cooking
>> biking - mountain and road
>> and recently...BOATING :-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Margaret
>>
>
> I'll include music anyway...playing and singing blues, rock and r&b,
> mostly blues
> Favorites are Peter Green, Sleepy John Estes, Otis Rush, Willie Dixon,
> Mike Bloomfield.
> Other than that, travel.
>
> So Maggie V., tell us about your art collecting.
Hi Art!
.......hmmmm....... :-) ......!!!
Assuming you were serious, it is not something really big time. I have
fairly limited formal training on the subject, a class in art appreciation
as a college elective and another advanced class to help me get through a
boring MBA program. I probably have something like 189 pieces which have
resulted from over 20 years of buying and selling. The hobby broke even
about 10 years ago, something this audio hobby will never do. :-)
My collection ranges from a picture of Fidel and Che to flashy mexican
bronze warriors to tikis from pacific islands to african masks to a native
american totem to sculptures and paintings from the Americas and Europe to a
neon self-portrait of an Irish artist residing here in Texas. Almost
everything goes as long as it is original and I like it, only Asian art
escapes me so far. I'd be more than happy to e-mail you pictures of some
real treasures (paintings) I acquired this past winter while on assignment
overseas if you're genuinely interested. Just let me know.
So what instruments do you play?
Cheers,
Margaret
Robert Morein
July 6th 05, 02:44 AM
"Margaret von B." > wrote in message
.. .
> Aside from audio and music, that is.
>
> Mine are:
>
> collecting art
> cooking
> biking - mountain and road
> and recently...BOATING :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Margaret
>
I'm not really a card-carrying member of the "leisure class". Most of my
hobbies seem to be motivated by a very high need for novelty in my life, or
a craving to satisfy the "I can do that" imitative urge, or "for the
experience". I don't have a lot of "habitual" hobbies. I jog, but I doubt
that could be called a hobby. The closest thing to a hobby that I have is a
Fatar keyboard, hooked up to a computer, that I'm using to learn piano, and
satisfy an urge to noodle on one.
I hiked across the Grand Canyon -- for the novelty. Did a little of the
Appalachian Trail. I took four hours of flying lessons -- that was enough. I
do a little quantum philosophy, some DSP theorizing, and some basement
inventing.
I semifinaled in the Chesterfield Screenwriting Contest in Y2K, and I had a
script optioned by a famous producer. But as I would like to participate
vocationally in this field, it does not qualify as a hobby.
Reading Arthur Miller's autobiography, Time Bends.
Lionel
July 6th 05, 08:58 AM
Margaret von B. a écrit :
> Aside from audio and music, that is.
>
> Mine are:
>
> collecting art
> cooking
> biking - mountain and road
> and recently...BOATING :-)
- Holidays (camping with family)
- Hand-ball
- Biking (road)
- Linux
- DIY speakers
- 2-3 times a year, drinking a lot with pals, playing guitar
and singing and remaking the world.
Lionel
July 6th 05, 11:09 AM
George M. Middius a écrit :
>
> and golf, although I'm not very good.
Even as a golf course... I hear that you are a too easy
hole. :-D
GeoSynch
July 6th 05, 11:36 AM
'lil Georgie squeaked:
> I like ... hunting ....
For what? Lapdogs like Singh?
GeoSynch
Yeah, let's hear it for road cycling!
Ham radio, although not too seriously. Just to B.S. with my buddies
sometimes.
Cooking. (Then cycling to keep the weight off.)
Building cars. Hot rods and antique ones.
Reading, mostly science.
Sander deWaal
July 6th 05, 04:53 PM
"Margaret von B." > said:
>Aside from audio and music, that is.
DIY audio, designing and building electronic contraptions.
Making music, either with friends or in my "studio".
Collecting and fixing old tube radios.
My Citroens, of course!
Feeding the cats.
Entertaining and satisfying my wife.
Moderating a Dutch electronics forum.
An amateur car mechanic.
Reading, Lot'S ;-)
And RAO, of course.
--
"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005
George Middius
July 6th 05, 05:40 PM
Stynchblob squealed:
>> I like ... hunting ....
>For what? Lapdogs like Singh?
For woodland rodents. And skinheads.
Who is your favorite historical figure, Mr. Blob? I think it's Jack the Ripper
but another Normal thinks it's William Jennings Bryan. Is either of us right, or
is it Edgar Ray Killen?
Lionel
July 6th 05, 06:29 PM
George Middius a écrit :
> Stynchblob squealed:
>
>
>>>I like ... hunting ....
>
>
>>For what? Lapdogs like Singh?
>
>
> ...And skinheads.
very young ones they are more tender. ;-)
George Middius posed:
>
>
> >> I like ... hunting ....
>
>
>
> >For what? Lapdogs like Singh?
>
> For woodland rodents.
>
>
Necro-bestiality.....another "Middius" first! ;-)
George M. Middius wrote:
> and golf, although I'm not very good.
>
>
Can't get your putter to stand up?
Clyde Slick
July 6th 05, 08:30 PM
"George Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Stynchblob squealed:
>
>>> I like ... hunting ....
>
>>For what? Lapdogs like Singh?
>
> For woodland rodents. And skinheads.
>
The ones with the camouflage tattoos are too hard to spot.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
GeoSynch
July 6th 05, 08:47 PM
'lil Georgie makes like Elmer Fudd:
>>> I like ... hunting ....
>>For what? Lapdogs like Singh?
> For woodland rodents.
You and your ringleader bud Lowell Mather?
Your oily, pudgy demeanor probably bears a striking
resemblance to Roy Biggins.
> Who is your favorite historical figure?
Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
GeoSynch
> wrote ...
>
>
> George M. Middius wrote:
>> and golf, although I'm not very good.
>>
>>
> Can't get your putter to stand up?
>
Did someone tell you your were funny once?
I'd recommend a second opinion.
Here's one:
You're ugly too.
George M. Middius
July 6th 05, 10:17 PM
sam said:
> I'd recommend a second opinion.
> Here's one:
> You're ugly too.
"Nobody ever died from acne."
-- Mama Thing, to Young Thing, many times in the '60s
"GeoSynch" > wrote...
>
>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>
> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
Lionel
July 7th 05, 07:58 AM
Sam's surf wrote:
> "GeoSynch" > wrote...
>
>>>Who is your favorite historical figure?
>>
>>Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
>
>
>
> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
So what ? Middius don't act like a human being.
GeoSynch
July 7th 05, 10:43 AM
Tommy two-toned:
>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
New breed of Christian, Smurfshop.
We don't turn the other cheek anymore.
We come back with both barrels blazing.
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 7th 05, 11:08 AM
PudgeFacker the Gimp has been gossiping in private e-mail again:
> Who is your favorite historical figure, Mr. Blob? I think it's Jack the Ripper
> but another Normal thinks it's William Jennings Bryan. Is either of us right,
> or
> is it Edgar Ray Killen?
Only in your own private little Bizarro world could you be considered "Normal."
In this one, you're anything but, 'lil Georgie.
Any truth to the rumor of Killen being initiated into the KKK by the former
Grand Kleagle and current U.S. Senator Robert Byrd?
GeoSynch
George M. Middius
July 7th 05, 12:12 PM
sam said Grand Dragon Stynchblob:
> > Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
I missed the part where JEE-zus said to kill all the fags and mud people.
Maybe Stynchie believes his own agenda is somehow in line with what JEE-zus
wanted, even though to an untrained ;-) layperson such as myself, hatred and
persecution seem the opposite of his message.
Oh well. I'll just never get the fundie version of "christianity".
Margaret von B.
July 7th 05, 01:28 PM
"GeoSynch" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> Tommy two-toned:
>
>>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>
>>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
>
>> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
>
> New breed of Christian, Smurfshop.
>
> We don't turn the other cheek anymore.
> We come back with both barrels blazing.
>
Ah, just like David Koresh. LOL!
Margaret
George M. Middius
July 7th 05, 01:33 PM
Margaret von B. said:
> > We don't turn the other cheek anymore.
> > We come back with both barrels blazing.
> Ah, just like David Koresh. LOL!
At least Styncho admits he's gone psycho and he's comfortable with that.
Arny Krueger
July 7th 05, 01:41 PM
"sam" > wrote in message
> "GeoSynch" > wrote...
>>
>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>>
>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
A common misconception among many poorly informed people is
that admiring the works of Jesus makes a person a Christian.
> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
He doesn't have to. See above.
BTW, neither do you, Surf. Let me guess - you make no
pretenses about being a Christian so your egregious behavior
is just OK.
GeoSynch wrote:
> PudgeFacker the Gimp has been gossiping in private e-mail again:
>
> > Who is your favorite historical figure, Mr. Blob? I think it's Jack the Ripper
> > but another Normal thinks it's William Jennings Bryan. Is either of us right,
> > or
> > is it Edgar Ray Killen?
>
> Only in your own private little Bizarro world could you be considered "Normal."
>
>
lil' Georgie's Bizzaro world is inhabited by: Sackman, Dormer, weil,
Albertz, Phillips, Briggs/Davies, Maggie the cyber-transvestite,
Wheeler and other assorted nutjobs. In that world, lil' Georgie is
"Normal"!
>
>
> In this one, you're anything but, 'lil Georgie.
>
>
Margaret von B.
July 7th 05, 02:00 PM
"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "sam" > wrote in message
>
>> "GeoSynch" > wrote...
>>>
>>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>>>
>>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
>
> A common misconception among many poorly informed people is
> that admiring the works of Jesus makes a person a Christian.
>
>> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
>
> He doesn't have to. See above.
>
> BTW, neither do you, Surf. Let me guess - you make no
> pretenses about being a Christian so your egregious behavior
> is just OK.
>
You certainly know the consequences of "egregious" behavior better than
most. Not that you have learned anything...
Margaret
...dickie Malesweski writes:
>>
> lil' Georgie's Bizzaro world is inhabited by: Sackman, Dormer, weil,
> Albertz, Phillips, Briggs/Davies, Maggie the cyber-transvestite,
> Wheeler and others
I wonder which party would be more fun. Ours or yours with
you, Arny, Lionel and Stynk. LOL
"Arny Krueger" > wrote...
> "sam" > wrote
>> "GeoSynch" > wrote...
>>>
>>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>>>
>>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
>
> A common misconception among many poorly informed people is
> that admiring the works of Jesus makes a person a Christian.
the misconception by the arrogant nerd (you), is that I based
my comment on the above statement.
> BTW, neither do you, Surf. Let me guess - you make no
> pretenses about being a Christian so your egregious behavior
> is just OK.
my behavior is far less egregious than yours, nerd.
"GeoSynch" > wrote...
> Tommy two-toned:
>
>>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>
>>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
>
>> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
>
> New breed of Christian, Smurfshop.
> We don't turn the other cheek anymore.
> We come back with both barrels blazing.
that's BS, Stynch. no one including you believes that.
why not be honest and call hostility hostility?
who are you? should I know you by another name?
Margaret von B.
July 7th 05, 03:05 PM
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Margaret von B. said:
>
>> > We don't turn the other cheek anymore.
>> > We come back with both barrels blazing.
>
>> Ah, just like David Koresh. LOL!
>
> At least Styncho admits he's gone psycho and he's comfortable with that.
>
Maybe he'll eventually get on CNN as "the other white meat" at the next Waco
style BBQ...
Cheers,
Margaret
George Middius
July 7th 05, 03:29 PM
sam said:
>I wonder which party would be more fun. Ours or yours with
>you, Arny, Lionel and Stynk. LOL
LOL! (at our party only, of course)
Hey Styncho, you might reconsider putting Krooger in charge of the "no homos"
sign. He'll probably have a Krooglish attack and misspell some of the words. ;-)
George Middius
July 7th 05, 03:33 PM
Margaret von B. said:
>>> Ah, just like David Koresh. LOL!
>> At least Styncho admits he's gone psycho and he's comfortable with that.
>Maybe he'll eventually get on CNN as "the other white meat" at the next Waco
>style BBQ...
Good one. :-)
Stynchie, are you planning ahead for when you commit your killing spree? You
probably want to pick a state where the prisons are loaded up with your fellow
Aryans. And you might want to start pumping iron now. All that flab will make
you *such* a target in the pen.
George "why do you want me to pick up the soap?" Middius remembers:
>
>
> And you might want to start pumping iron now. All that flab will make
> you *such* a target in the pen.
>
>
The voice of experience, eh, "George"? ;-)
George Middius
July 7th 05, 04:36 PM
The Hivies have finally figured out the benefits of division of labor.
>> And you might want to start pumping iron now. All that flab will make
>> you *such* a target in the pen.
>The voice of experience, eh, "George"? ;-)
Who directed both you and Slut to take over IKYABWAI duties, Thing? I will
acknowledge that as far as evasiveness and hypocrisy, Krooger is still the
MasterBorg. Your strategy is, as ever, elusive.
Arny Krueger
July 7th 05, 05:19 PM
"Margaret von B." > wrote
in
message
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "sam" > wrote in message
>>
>>> "GeoSynch" > wrote...
>>>>
>>>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>>>>
>>>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
>>
>> A common misconception among many poorly informed people
is
>> that admiring the works of Jesus makes a person a
Christian.
>>
>>> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
>>
>> He doesn't have to. See above.
>>
>> BTW, neither do you, Surf. Let me guess - you make no
>> pretenses about being a Christian so your egregious
behavior
>> is just OK.
>>
>
> You certainly know the consequences of "egregious"
behavior
> better than most.
Thanks for agreeing that I have been targeted by an
exceptional amount of egregious behavior, Maggie. You are
one of the sources, but after all its what you do! ;-)
Arny Krueger
July 7th 05, 05:21 PM
"sam" > wrote in message
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote...
>> "sam" > wrote
>>> "GeoSynch" > wrote...
>>>>
>>>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>>>>
>>>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
>> A common misconception among many poorly informed people
is
>> that admiring the works of Jesus makes a person a
Christian.
> the misconception by the arrogant nerd (you), is that I
based
> my comment on the above statement.
Wrong, its quite clear that you couldn't have based your
comment on the statement you referred to because it hadn't
been made, yet.
>> BTW, neither do you, Surf. Let me guess - you make no
>> pretenses about being a Christian so your egregious
behavior
>> is just OK.
> my behavior is far less egregious than yours, nerd.
That's what all the Middius tools are programmed to say.
Arny Krueger wrote:
> "sam" > wrote in message
> Let me guess - you make no
> >> pretenses about being a Christian so your egregious
> behavior
> >> is just OK.
>
> > my behavior is far less egregious than yours, nerd.
>
> That's what all the Middius tools are programmed to say.
>
>
And lil' Tommy Surf has all the "virtues" Middius seeks in his tools:
not-too-smart, eager-to-please, willing-to-do-anything, needs-a-friend.
:-O
Margaret von B.
July 7th 05, 05:37 PM
"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Margaret von B." > wrote
> in
> message
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "sam" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> "GeoSynch" > wrote...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
>>>
>>> A common misconception among many poorly informed people
> is
>>> that admiring the works of Jesus makes a person a
> Christian.
>>>
>>>> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
>>>
>>> He doesn't have to. See above.
>>>
>>> BTW, neither do you, Surf. Let me guess - you make no
>>> pretenses about being a Christian so your egregious
> behavior
>>> is just OK.
>>>
>>
>> You certainly know the consequences of "egregious"
> behavior
>> better than most.
>
> Thanks for agreeing that I have been targeted by an
> exceptional amount of egregious behavior, Maggie.
It's between you and God! Sorry but cannot help you. :-(
>You are
> one of the sources, but after all its what you do! ;-)
>
Thanks for agreeing that you truly deserve it, Arnii. Lo'Ts!
Cheers,
Margaret
PS. Please note the attempt to communicate with your native wigglish or
whatever it is called.
"Arny Krueger" > wrote...
> "sam" > wrote in message
>
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote...
>>> "sam" > wrote
>>>> "GeoSynch" > wrote...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Who is your favorite historical figure?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jesus of Nazareth, but that should be no surprise.
>
>>> A common misconception among many poorly
>>> informed people is that admiring the works of Jesus
>>> makes a person a Christian.
>
>> the misconception by the arrogant nerd (you), is
>> that I based my comment on the above statement.
>
> Wrong, its quite clear that you couldn't have based your
> comment on the statement you referred to because it hadn't
> been made, yet.
wrong, nerd.
>> my behavior is far less egregious than yours, nerd.
>
> That's what all the Middius tools are programmed to say.
correct, nerd.
thanks for admitting we are programmed to speak the truth.
Howard Ferstler
July 7th 05, 09:30 PM
"George M. Middius" wrote:
>
> and golf, although I'm not very good.
Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
footnote submitted by "George." Keep your names straight
when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
Howard Ferstler
dave weil
July 7th 05, 09:40 PM
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:30:52 -0400, Howard Ferstler
> wrote:
>"George M. Middius" wrote:
>>
>> and golf, although I'm not very good.
>
>Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
>footnote submitted by "George." Keep your names straight
>when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
>
>Howard Ferstler
You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
(under his OWN name), which followed Maggie's initial post.
Please try to keep up.
George Middius
July 7th 05, 09:42 PM
Harold the Magnificent, Generalissimo of the Sockpuppet Army, issues orders to
the rest of Usenet.
>> and golf, although I'm not very good.
>
>Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
>footnote submitted by "George."
Your mental incontinence is not my responsibility, Clerkie.
>Keep your names straight
>when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
As you wish, Your Majesty.
BTW, any decent health plan should cover mental health services. You might want
to see about getting your head examined. Unless you don't care how foolish you
sound when you try to make "deductions".
ScottW
July 7th 05, 09:52 PM
dave weil wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:30:52 -0400, Howard Ferstler
> > wrote:
>
> >"George M. Middius" wrote:
> >>
> >> and golf, although I'm not very good.
> >
> >Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
> >footnote submitted by "George." Keep your names straight
> >when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
> >
> >Howard Ferstler
>
> You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
> was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
> (under his OWN name),
Then it should be a reply to his post... not the OP.
George's netiquette is declining faster than his logic.
> which followed Maggie's initial post.
>
> Please try to keep up.
And we thought etiquette was a requirement of your profression.
ScottW
George M. Middius
July 7th 05, 10:40 PM
ScottieDimwitTerrierdork makes it up as he barks along.
> > You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
> > was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
> > (under his OWN name),
>
> Then it should be a reply to his post... not the OP.
Says who?
> George's netiquette is declining faster than his logic.
Sorry, I don't feel it's important to cater to the imbecile contingent.
George M. Middius
July 7th 05, 10:44 PM
Harold "Plagiarism for Dummies" Ferstler, King of the Sockpuppets, asserts
his authority in the domain of anonymous ****headedness.
> Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
> footnote submitted by "George."
Immense stupidity noted.
> Keep your names straight
> when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
While we're on your favorite talking point of "sockpuppets", Clerkie, it's
about time you admitted the sockpuppets are all on *your* side. I'm talking,
of course, about Dickie "torrie****s" Malesweski, Mickey "NYOB" McMickey,
Lionella "La Salope" Sha-pwee, and Michael "Bwian McLardass" Conzo. Two are
crazy, one is a retard, and the other one shovels **** for a living. And
they all hide behind pseudonyms.
Your army of sockpuppets, and welcome to Them.
ScottW
July 8th 05, 01:14 AM
George M. Middius wrote:
> ScottieDimwitTerrierdork makes it up as he barks along.
>
> > > You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
> > > was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
> > > (under his OWN name),
> >
> > Then it should be a reply to his post... not the OP.
>
> Says who?
Says me. Look at the Google thread and see your disconnected "and
golf" post isn't even on the same page as your first post. Every day
it gets even further disconnected.
I suppose that is you in a word. Simply disconnected.
>
> > George's netiquette is declining faster than his logic.
>
> Sorry, I don't feel it's important to cater to the imbecile contingent.
Still can't admit you don't know everything. How does it feel to be
like Arny?
ScottW
George M. Middius
July 8th 05, 01:44 AM
Oh, to be simple in a simple world.....
> > ScottieDimwitTerrierdork makes it up as he barks along.
> >
> > > > You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
> > > > was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
> > > > (under his OWN name),
> > >
> > > Then it should be a reply to his post... not the OP.
> >
> > Says who?
>
> Says me.
Oh, of course. How could I have asked such a question?
Be a good Terrierdork and publish the rest of your Rules For A Stupid
Existence. We can all study up and then we'll be fully prepared to have
meaningless arguments with you about inane subjects that you, and only you
because of your pervasive stupidity, cannot fathom.
Arny Krueger
July 8th 05, 02:32 AM
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net> wrote in message
> Sorry, I don't feel it's important to cater to the
imbecile
> contingent.
George, you've turned your back on your supporters on RAO?
ScottW
July 8th 05, 02:47 AM
George M. Middius wrote:
> Oh, to be simple in a simple world.....
>
> > > ScottieDimwitTerrierdork makes it up as he barks along.
> > >
> > > > > You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
> > > > > was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
> > > > > (under his OWN name),
> > > >
> > > > Then it should be a reply to his post... not the OP.
> > >
> > > Says who?
> >
> > Says me.
>
> Oh, of course. How could I have asked such a question?
>
> Be a good Terrierdork and publish the rest of your Rules For A Stupid
> Existence. We can all study up and then we'll be fully prepared to have
> meaningless arguments with you about inane subjects that you, and only you
> because of your pervasive stupidity, cannot fathom.
George talks a lot but this fact reamains, his failure to address his
disconnection is logical abdication.
ScottW
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 02:54 AM
"sam" > wrote in message
...
> ..dickie Malesweski writes:
>>>
>> lil' Georgie's Bizzaro world is inhabited by: Sackman, Dormer, weil,
>> Albertz, Phillips, Briggs/Davies, Maggie the cyber-transvestite,
>> Wheeler and others
>
>
> I wonder which party would be more fun. Ours or yours with
> you, Arny, Lionel and Stynk. LOL
>
>
>
"at least" we'd have some girls over.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 02:57 AM
"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> Thanks for agreeing that I have been targeted by an
> exceptional amount of egregious behavior, Maggie.
Its true, indeed, you do target yourself. You're sick!
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 02:58 AM
"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
...
> "George M. Middius" wrote:
>>
>> and golf, although I'm not very good.
>
> Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
> footnote submitted by "George." Keep your names straight
> when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
>
> Howard Ferstler
Learn how to read, MORON!
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Arny Krueger wrote:
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
> [dot] net> wrote in message
>
> > Sorry, I don't feel it's important to cater to the
> imbecile
> > contingent.
>
> George, you've turned your back on your supporters on RAO?
>
>
No more cozying up to Sackman, weil, Albertz, Dormer, Phillips,
Mags-the-cyber-tranny and the other imbeciles of the Middius Clique?
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 03:03 AM
"ScottW" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> How does it feel to be
> like Arny?
>
> ScottW
>
You mean, how does it feel to admitting to pimping one's wife,
or how does it feel to admitting one collects kidie porn, or how
does it feel to lie about receiving kiddie porn emails, or how
does it feel to sneak out of your son's funeral to post more
vile material on RAO, or do you mean how does it feel to falsely
accuse a multitude of others of sending one kiddie porn?
Please be more specific.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Clyde Slick wrote:
> "sam" > wrote in message
> ...
> > ..dickie Malesweski writes:
> >>>
> >> lil' Georgie's Bizzaro world is inhabited by: Sackman, Dormer, weil,
> >> Albertz, Phillips, Briggs/Davies, Maggie the cyber-transvestite,
> >> Wheeler and others
> >
> >
> > I wonder which party would be more fun. Ours or yours with
> > you, Arny, Lionel and Stynk. LOL
> >
> >
> >
>
> "at least" we'd have some girls over.
>
"At least" one girl: a Realtor by day but a Dominatrix by night, she'll
put on a big strap on dildo for Tommy Albertz to deepthroat. :-D
>
>
GeoSynch
July 8th 05, 03:42 AM
Mags divined:
>> We don't turn the other cheek anymore.
>> We come back with both barrels blazing.
> Ah, just like David Koresh. LOL!
Praise the Lord and pass the ammo, Maggie doll.
YeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeHAWWWWWWWWWW!!
> Margaret
(What, no "Cheers" this time round, Maggie baby?)
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 8th 05, 03:46 AM
Boy George screws up "his" courage:
> Margaret von B. said:
>>Maybe he'll eventually get on CNN as "the other white meat" at the next Waco
>>style BBQ...
> Good one. :-)
You can practically see Boy George quivering in his dainty little boots as
he typed the above. This is the closest that Georgy girl can get interacting
with a real live woman, and he still manages to fall apart doing so.
Ahh, poor 'lil Georgie, it sure must suck - literally - to be you.
> Stynchie, are you planning ahead for when you commit your killing spree? You
> probably want to pick a state where the prisons are loaded up with your fellow
> Aryans. And you might want to start pumping iron now. All that flab will make
> you *such* a target in the pen.
Boy George fantasies the above scenario (with himself starring in it) each night
before drifting off to blissful sleep.
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 8th 05, 03:54 AM
Doubting Tom ain't convinced:
>>> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
>> New breed of Christian, Smurfshop.
>> We don't turn the other cheek anymore.
>> We come back with both barrels blazing.
> that's BS, Stynch. no one including you believes that.
> why not be honest and call hostility hostility?
Our meeker brethren, God bless them, may well inherit
the Earth, but we, on the other hand, will no longer allow
ourselves to be bullied or trampled or marginalized by
the shrill, godless secularists. We're more than ready to
fight fire with fire.
And guess what, Tommy boy, we're slowly reclaiming this
once proud and great country from the cultural decadence
foisted on it by the Sodom-and-Gomorrah degenerates.
> who are you?
I am me, that's who.
> should I know you by another name?
Perhaps if you put on your thinking cap and gave it a whirl...
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 8th 05, 03:59 AM
'lil Georgie scampers out of the kitchen:
> Oh well. I'll just never get the fundie version of "christianity".
You're lying to yourself, George. You do get it, but you can't
bear to bring yourself to admit it, because of the cognitive
dissonance maelstrom it would unleash in your feeble mind.
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 8th 05, 04:07 AM
Pudge drolled:
> sam said:
>>I wonder which party would be more fun. Ours or yours with
>>you, Arny, Lionel and Stynk. LOL
> LOL! (at our party only, of course)
> Hey Styncho, you might reconsider putting Krooger in charge of the "no homos"
> sign. He'll probably have a Krooglish attack and misspell some of the words.
> ;-)
'lil Georgie makes funny ... how cute.
GeoSynch
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 04:10 AM
"GeoSynch" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> Pudge drolled:
>
>> sam said:
>
>>>I wonder which party would be more fun. Ours or yours with
>>>you, Arny, Lionel and Stynk. LOL
>
>> LOL! (at our party only, of course)
>
>> Hey Styncho, you might reconsider putting Krooger in charge of the "no
>> homos"
>> sign. He'll probably have a Krooglish attack and misspell some of the
>> words. ;-)
>
> 'lil Georgie makes funny ... how cute.
>
No humus?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Clyde Slick wrote:
> "GeoSynch" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
> > Pudge drolled:
> >
> >> sam said:
> >
> >>>I wonder which party would be more fun. Ours or yours with
> >>>you, Arny, Lionel and Stynk. LOL
> >
> >> LOL! (at our party only, of course)
> >
> >> Hey Styncho, you might reconsider putting Krooger in charge of the "no
> >> homos"
> >> sign. He'll probably have a Krooglish attack and misspell some of the
> >> words. ;-)
> >
> > 'lil Georgie makes funny ... how cute.
> >
>
> No humus?
>
>
>
Don't you hum while yer sucking George off?
GeoSynch
July 8th 05, 04:32 AM
Clyde Slick wondered:
> No humus?
Must've run out of chickpeas.
GeoSynch
Michael Conzo
July 8th 05, 06:04 AM
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
wrote:
> I'm talking,
> of course, about Dickie "torrie****s" Malesweski, Mickey "NYOB" McMickey,
> Lionella "La Salope" Sha-pwee, and Michael "Bwian McLardass" Conzo.
I gave you the ability to compltely confirm that I am NOT anyone else.
Actually, on two occasions. You can't now continue to attack me for your
own stuffup.
And as I understand, "George Middius" is in fact a sockpuppet name. True?
dave weil
July 8th 05, 06:30 AM
On 7 Jul 2005 13:52:21 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>
>dave weil wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:30:52 -0400, Howard Ferstler
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >"George M. Middius" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> and golf, although I'm not very good.
>> >
>> >Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
>> >footnote submitted by "George." Keep your names straight
>> >when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
>> >
>> >Howard Ferstler
>>
>> You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
>> was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
>> (under his OWN name),
>
> Then it should be a reply to his post... not the OP.
It wasn't...and it wasn't. If you bother to go back to the beginning
of the thread, you'll see that it was an addition to his original post
and wasn't a "reply". To either post.
You're slipping further into the morass.
dave weil
July 8th 05, 06:33 AM
On 7 Jul 2005 17:14:46 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> Says me. Look at the Google thread and see your disconnected "and
>golf" post isn't even on the same page as your first post.
So google has a strange tree structure. On my newsreader, it's the
third post chronologically, as indeed it was in the thread.
dave weil
July 8th 05, 06:36 AM
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:54:29 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>Doubting Tom ain't convinced:
>
>>>> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
>
>>> New breed of Christian, Smurfshop.
>>> We don't turn the other cheek anymore.
>>> We come back with both barrels blazing.
>
>> that's BS, Stynch. no one including you believes that.
>> why not be honest and call hostility hostility?
>
>Our meeker brethren, God bless them, may well inherit
>the Earth, but we, on the other hand, will no longer allow
>ourselves to be bullied or trampled or marginalized by
>the shrill, godless secularists. We're more than ready to
>fight fire with fire.
>
>And guess what, Tommy boy, we're slowly reclaiming this
>once proud and great country from the cultural decadence
>foisted on it by the Sodom-and-Gomorrah degenerates.
>
>> who are you?
>
>I am me, that's who.
>
>> should I know you by another name?
>
>Perhaps if you put on your thinking cap and gave it a whirl...
>
You're not trying to bait me into revealing your real name, are you?
GeoSynch
July 8th 05, 06:38 AM
dave weil wrote:
> GeoSynch wrote:
>>Doubting Tom ain't convinced:
>>> should I know you by another name?
>>Perhaps if you put on your thinking cap and gave it a whirl...
> You're not trying to bait me into revealing your real name, are you?
Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
GeoSynch
Michael Conzo wrote:
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm talking,
> > of course, about Dickie "torrie****s" Malesweski, Mickey "NYOB" McMickey,
> > Lionella "La Salope" Sha-pwee, and Michael "Bwian McLardass" Conzo.
>
> I gave you the ability to compltely confirm that I am NOT anyone else.
> Actually, on two occasions. You can't now continue to attack me for your
> own stuffup.
>
>
Don't muck up "George's" little fantasy world with facts!
>
>
> And as I understand, "George Middius" is in fact a sockpuppet name. True?
>
>
It has been proven that there is no actual person named "George M.
Middius" or "George Middius".
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 12:11 PM
> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
>
> Michael Conzo wrote:
>> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm talking,
>> > of course, about Dickie "torrie****s" Malesweski, Mickey "NYOB"
>> > McMickey,
>> > Lionella "La Salope" Sha-pwee, and Michael "Bwian McLardass" Conzo.
>>
>> I gave you the ability to compltely confirm that I am NOT anyone else.
>> Actually, on two occasions. You can't now continue to attack me for your
>> own stuffup.
>>
>>
> Don't muck up "George's" little fantasy world with facts!
>>
>>
>> And as I understand, "George Middius" is in fact a sockpuppet name.
>> True?
>>
>>
> It has been proven that there is no actual person named "George M.
> Middius" or "George Middius".
>
Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse in Kensington?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
George M. Middius
July 8th 05, 12:22 PM
dave weil said:
> It wasn't...and it wasn't. If you bother to go back to the beginning
> of the thread, you'll see that it was an addition to his original post
> and wasn't a "reply". To either post.
>
> You're slipping further into the morass.
Scottie's idea of a hobby horse is an inchworm.
Arny Krueger
July 8th 05, 12:23 PM
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net> wrote in message
> Harold "Plagiarism for Dummies" Ferstler, King of the
> Sockpuppets, asserts his authority in the domain of
anonymous
> ****headedness.
Ferstler king of the sockpuppets? LOL!
More proof that Middius has completely lost it.
Ferstler couldn't have less interest in sockpuppets, and
Middius couldn't have more!
George M. Middius
July 8th 05, 12:26 PM
Clyde Slick said:
> Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse in Kensington?
Little **** is all bark and no bite. He didn't even have the stones to show
up at the BBQ party I held last month. BTW, you left the last two bottles of
your six-pack in the fridge. Can I have them?
Clyde Slick wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >
> >
> > Michael Conzo wrote:
> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm talking,
> >> > of course, about Dickie "torrie****s" Malesweski, Mickey "NYOB"
> >> > McMickey,
> >> > Lionella "La Salope" Sha-pwee, and Michael "Bwian McLardass" Conzo.
> >>
> >> I gave you the ability to compltely confirm that I am NOT anyone else.
> >> Actually, on two occasions. You can't now continue to attack me for your
> >> own stuffup.
> >>
> >>
> > Don't muck up "George's" little fantasy world with facts!
> >>
> >>
> >> And as I understand, "George Middius" is in fact a sockpuppet name.
> >> True?
> >>
> >>
> > It has been proven that there is no actual person named "George M.
> > Middius" or "George Middius".
> >
>
> Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse in Kensington?
>
>
>
Is that guy's legal name either "George Middius" or "George M.
Middius"?
>
>
____YES
>
>
____NO
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 12:55 PM
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>> Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse in Kensington?
>
> Little **** is all bark and no bite. He didn't even have the stones to
> show
> up at the BBQ party I held last month. BTW, you left the last two bottles
> of
> your six-pack in the fridge. Can I have them?
>
I thought they were cans
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 01:02 PM
> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
>
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> ups.com...
>> >
>> >
>> > Michael Conzo wrote:
>> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I'm talking,
>> >> > of course, about Dickie "torrie****s" Malesweski, Mickey "NYOB"
>> >> > McMickey,
>> >> > Lionella "La Salope" Sha-pwee, and Michael "Bwian McLardass" Conzo.
>> >>
>> >> I gave you the ability to compltely confirm that I am NOT anyone else.
>> >> Actually, on two occasions. You can't now continue to attack me for
>> >> your
>> >> own stuffup.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > Don't muck up "George's" little fantasy world with facts!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> And as I understand, "George Middius" is in fact a sockpuppet name.
>> >> True?
>> >>
>> >>
>> > It has been proven that there is no actual person named "George M.
>> > Middius" or "George Middius".
>> >
>>
>> Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse in Kensington?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Is that guy's legal name either "George Middius" or "George M.
> Middius"?
>>
>>
> ____YES
>>
>>
> ____NO
>
As much as I am sure of that Arny Krueger, Dave Weil,
Howard Ferstler, Scott Wittevrongel, Art Sackman and torresists are legal
names.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Clyde Slick wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> >
> > Clyde Slick wrote:
> >> > wrote in message
> >> ups.com...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Michael Conzo wrote:
> >> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > I'm talking,
> >> >> > of course, about Dickie "torrie****s" Malesweski, Mickey "NYOB"
> >> >> > McMickey,
> >> >> > Lionella "La Salope" Sha-pwee, and Michael "Bwian McLardass" Conzo.
> >> >>
> >> >> I gave you the ability to compltely confirm that I am NOT anyone else.
> >> >> Actually, on two occasions. You can't now continue to attack me for
> >> >> your
> >> >> own stuffup.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > Don't muck up "George's" little fantasy world with facts!
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> And as I understand, "George Middius" is in fact a sockpuppet name.
> >> >> True?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > It has been proven that there is no actual person named "George M.
> >> > Middius" or "George Middius".
> >> >
> >>
> >> Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse in Kensington?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Is that guy's legal name either "George Middius" or "George M.
> > Middius"?
> >>
> >>
> > ____YES
> >>
> >>
> > ____NO
> >
>
> As much as I am sure of that Arny Krueger, Dave Weil,
> Howard Ferstler, Scott Wittevrongel, Art Sackman and torresists are legal
> names.
>
>
>
Nice evasion, SackO****.
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 01:17 PM
> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
>
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> >
>> >
>> > Clyde Slick wrote:
>> >> > wrote in message
>> >> ups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Michael Conzo wrote:
>> >> >> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot]
>> >> >> net>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > I'm talking,
>> >> >> > of course, about Dickie "torrie****s" Malesweski, Mickey "NYOB"
>> >> >> > McMickey,
>> >> >> > Lionella "La Salope" Sha-pwee, and Michael "Bwian McLardass"
>> >> >> > Conzo.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I gave you the ability to compltely confirm that I am NOT anyone
>> >> >> else.
>> >> >> Actually, on two occasions. You can't now continue to attack me
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> your
>> >> >> own stuffup.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> > Don't muck up "George's" little fantasy world with facts!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And as I understand, "George Middius" is in fact a sockpuppet name.
>> >> >> True?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> > It has been proven that there is no actual person named "George M.
>> >> > Middius" or "George Middius".
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse in Kensington?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Is that guy's legal name either "George Middius" or "George M.
>> > Middius"?
>> >>
>> >>
>> > ____YES
>> >>
>> >>
>> > ____NO
>> >
>>
>> As much as I am sure of that Arny Krueger, Dave Weil,
>> Howard Ferstler, Scott Wittevrongel, Art Sackman and torresists are legal
>> names.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Nice evasion, SackO****.
>
take out the reference to the phony name torresists and it is
a dead true answer.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
dave weil
July 8th 05, 01:31 PM
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 05:38:56 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>dave weil wrote:
>
>> GeoSynch wrote:
>
>>>Doubting Tom ain't convinced:
>
>>>> should I know you by another name?
>
>>>Perhaps if you put on your thinking cap and gave it a whirl...
>
>> You're not trying to bait me into revealing your real name, are you?
>
>Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
Sorry, not biting.
Arny Krueger
July 8th 05, 01:39 PM
"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> > wrote in message
>
oups.com...
>>
>>
>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>> > wrote in message
>>>
ups.com...
>>>> It has been proven that there is no actual person named
>>>> "George M. Middius" or "George Middius".
>>>>
>>>
>>> Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse in
>>> Kensington?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Is that guy's legal name either "George Middius" or
"George M.
>> Middius"?
>>>
>>>
>> ____YES
>>>
>>>
>> ____NO
>>
>
> As much as I am sure of that Arny Krueger, Dave Weil,
> Howard Ferstler, Scott Wittevrongel, Art Sackman and
> torresists are legal names.
What a non-answer!
Arny Krueger
July 8th 05, 01:41 PM
"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> > wrote in message
>
ups.com...
>>
>>
>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>> > wrote in message
>>>
oups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>
ups.com...
>>>>> Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse
in
>>>>> Kensington?
>>>> Is that guy's legal name either "George Middius" or
"George
>>>> M. Middius"?
>>>> ____YES
>>>> ____NO
>>> As much as I am sure of that Arny Krueger, Dave Weil,
>>> Howard Ferstler, Scott Wittevrongel, Art Sackman and
>>> torresists are legal names.
>
>> Nice evasion, SackO****.
> take out the reference to the phony name torresists and it
is
> a dead true answer.
If you admit this easily that you were lying once Sackman,
what's the chance that this is also a lie? Pretty darn
good, I'd say.
George M. Middius
July 8th 05, 01:43 PM
dave weil said:
> >> You're not trying to bait me into revealing your real name, are you?
> >
> >Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
>
> Sorry, not biting.
Is it Clarence?
dave weil
July 8th 05, 02:37 PM
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:54:29 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>Doubting Tom ain't convinced:
>
>>>> You don't act like a Christian, Stink.
>
>>> New breed of Christian, Smurfshop.
>>> We don't turn the other cheek anymore.
>>> We come back with both barrels blazing.
>
>> that's BS, Stynch. no one including you believes that.
>> why not be honest and call hostility hostility?
>
>Our meeker brethren, God bless them, may well inherit
>the Earth, but we, on the other hand, will no longer allow
>ourselves to be bullied or trampled or marginalized by
>the shrill, godless secularists. We're more than ready to
>fight fire with fire.
>
>And guess what, Tommy boy, we're slowly reclaiming this
>once proud and great country from the cultural decadence
>foisted on it by the Sodom-and-Gomorrah degenerates.
>
>> who are you?
>
>I am me
And we are all together...goo goo gah joob.
I still remember when we Memphians burned those Beatle records in
1966. Of course, that didn't stop my parents from allowing my siblings
and me to see them in concert a month or two later.
George Middius
July 8th 05, 03:37 PM
How nice to see you coming to terms with reality, Arnii. We've been waiting
years, so this breakthrough is very significant.
>> Harold "Plagiarism for Dummies" Ferstler, King of the
>> Sockpuppets, asserts his authority in the domain of anonymous
>> ****headedness.
>Ferstler king of the sockpuppets...!
Thanks for admitting Mr. Krooborg that Ferstler is the King of the Sockpuppets.
Arny Krueger
July 8th 05, 04:31 PM
"George Middius" > wrote in
message
> How nice to see you coming to terms with reality, Arnii.
We've
> been waiting years, so this breakthrough is very
significant.
>
>>> Harold "Plagiarism for Dummies" Ferstler, King of the
>>> Sockpuppets, asserts his authority in the domain of
anonymous
>>> ****headedness.
>
>> Ferstler king of the sockpuppets...! <winky-smiley
emoticon deceptively deleted by Middius>
> Thanks for admitting Mr. Krooborg that Ferstler is the
King of
> the Sockpuppets.
Thanks Middius for admitting that the truth is nowhere in
what you post here.
Clyde Slick
July 8th 05, 11:50 PM
"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>> > wrote in message
>>
> ups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>
> oups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>>
> ups.com...
>
>>>>>> Does that include the guy who lives in that townhouse
> in
>>>>>> Kensington?
>
>>>>> Is that guy's legal name either "George Middius" or
> "George
>>>>> M. Middius"?
>
>>>>> ____YES
>
>>>>> ____NO
>
>>>> As much as I am sure of that Arny Krueger, Dave Weil,
>>>> Howard Ferstler, Scott Wittevrongel, Art Sackman and
>>>> torresists are legal names.
>>
>>> Nice evasion, SackO****.
>
>> take out the reference to the phony name torresists and it
> is
>> a dead true answer.
>
> If you admit this easily that you were lying once Sackman,
> what's the chance that this is also a lie? Pretty darn
> good, I'd say.
>
I am as sure that George Middius is his legal name, as sure
as I am that Arnold Krueger is your legal name.
Show me your birth certificate, marriage liscense, credit
cards, tax returns and driver's license, and maybe I'll
up my certainty a little.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
GeoSynch
July 9th 05, 03:56 AM
dave weil wrote:
>>Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
> Sorry, not biting.
Just a rhetorical tear-gas canister to see whether
you'd compromise on your ethical integrity...
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 9th 05, 04:00 AM
dave weil wrote:
>>I am me
> And we are all together...goo goo gah joob.
> I still remember when we Memphians burned those Beatle records in
> 1966. Of course, that didn't stop my parents from allowing my siblings
> and me to see them in concert a month or two later.
That's amazing. The two bands I regret never having seen perform live
were The Beatles and the Jimi Hendrix Experience.
GeoSynch
Lionel
July 9th 05, 10:00 AM
GeoStink a écrit :
> dave weil wrote:
>
>
>>>I am me
>
>
>>And we are all together...goo goo gah joob.
>
>
>>I still remember when we Memphians burned those Beatle records in
>>1966. Of course, that didn't stop my parents from allowing my siblings
>>and me to see them in concert a month or two later.
>
>
> That's amazing. The two bands I regret never having seen perform live
> were The Beatles and the Jimi Hendrix Experience.
Considering what you chose to became, I don't think that's a
real big loss for you. :-(
GeoSynch
July 9th 05, 11:58 AM
Froggy croaked:
> Considering what you chose to became, I don't think that's a real big loss for
> you. :-(
Ribbit.
GeoSynch
Lionel
July 9th 05, 12:30 PM
GeoStink AKA "Jesus Christ Superstar" wrote :
> Froggy croaked:
>
>
>>Considering what you chose to become, I don't think that's a real big loss for
>>you. :-(
>
>
> Ribbit.
Schizophrenic.
GeoSynch
July 9th 05, 12:47 PM
Pepe LePuke drooled:
>> Ribbit.
> Schizophrenic.
Moronic.
GeoSynch
dave weil
July 9th 05, 02:08 PM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:56:56 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>dave weil wrote:
>
>>>Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
>
>> Sorry, not biting.
>
>Just a rhetorical tear-gas canister to see whether
>you'd compromise on your ethical integrity...
Yep, I knew that. It's disappointing that you would do it.
I'm still surprised that people would draw an ethical line over me
posting something that made Lionel sound reasonable simply because it
was a private post. Shows how out of whack things are here.
So, here's an apology - I'm sorry Lionel. I shouldn't have disrupted
your annoying personna. You just carry on however you want to - it's
your personna after all.
dave weil
July 9th 05, 02:10 PM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 03:00:33 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>dave weil wrote:
>
>>>I am me
>
>> And we are all together...goo goo gah joob.
>
>> I still remember when we Memphians burned those Beatle records in
>> 1966. Of course, that didn't stop my parents from allowing my siblings
>> and me to see them in concert a month or two later.
>
>That's amazing. The two bands I regret never having seen perform live
>were The Beatles and the Jimi Hendrix Experience.
I'll have to say that I DIDN'T see Hendrix open for the Monkees a
couple of years later. My best friend went though. I'm pretty sure it
changed his life about as much as seeing the Beatles changed *mine*.
That's not to say that it was an extraordinary musical experience in
my case. It wasn't. It was more of a cultural one.
Clyde Slick
July 9th 05, 03:59 PM
"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:56:56 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> > wrote:
>
>>dave weil wrote:
>>
>>>>Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
>>
>>> Sorry, not biting.
>>
>>Just a rhetorical tear-gas canister to see whether
>>you'd compromise on your ethical integrity...
>
> Yep, I knew that. It's disappointing that you would do it.
>
> I'm still surprised that people would draw an ethical line over me
> posting something that made Lionel sound reasonable simply because it
> was a private post. Shows how out of whack things are here.
>
> So, here's an apology - I'm sorry Lionel. I shouldn't have disrupted
> your annoying personna. You just carry on however you want to - it's
> your personna after all.
>
it's a persona non grata
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Clyde Slick wrote:
> "dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:56:56 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>dave weil wrote:
> >>
> >>>>Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
> >>
> >>> Sorry, not biting.
> >>
> >>Just a rhetorical tear-gas canister to see whether
> >>you'd compromise on your ethical integrity...
> >
> > Yep, I knew that. It's disappointing that you would do it.
> >
> > I'm still surprised that people would draw an ethical line over me
> > posting something that made Lionel sound reasonable simply because it
> > was a private post. Shows how out of whack things are here.
> >
> > So, here's an apology - I'm sorry Lionel. I shouldn't have disrupted
> > your annoying personna. You just carry on however you want to - it's
> > your personna after all.
> >
>
> it's a persona non grata
>
>
>
And yours is a grating personna. :-O
ScottW
July 9th 05, 06:47 PM
dave weil wrote:
> On 7 Jul 2005 17:14:46 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> >
> > Says me. Look at the Google thread and see your disconnected "and
> >golf" post isn't even on the same page as your first post.
>
> So google has a strange tree structure. On my newsreader, it's the
> third post chronologically, as indeed it was in the thread.
Chronological ordering of posts would be a disaster in organization.
Subthtread structuring pushes it further and further from the original
post. Anyone replying to his first or replies to replies are inserted
between. This is structuring that Outlook, Google, Free Agent all use
as default.
George could have avoided this by posting a reply to his post rather
than a reply to the OP.
This is obvious yet it doesn't surprise you would choose to argue in
opposition and in favor of chronological ordering which destroys any
subthreading. I wonder if this is why you often appear confused?
ScottW
dave weil
July 9th 05, 07:07 PM
On 9 Jul 2005 10:47:07 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>
>dave weil wrote:
>> On 7 Jul 2005 17:14:46 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Says me. Look at the Google thread and see your disconnected "and
>> >golf" post isn't even on the same page as your first post.
>>
>> So google has a strange tree structure. On my newsreader, it's the
>> third post chronologically, as indeed it was in the thread.
>
>Chronological ordering of posts would be a disaster in organization.
It's not when you regularly read a newsgroup. And since I CAN choose
to use a tree structure when I need to, it's not a big deal.
> Subthtread structuring pushes it further and further from the original
>post. Anyone replying to his first or replies to replies are inserted
>between. This is structuring that Outlook, Google, Free Agent all use
>as default.
*My* defaultin Agent is chronolgical. I only choose a tree structure
when going back weeks to try to find a specific post.
>George could have avoided this by posting a reply to his post rather
>than a reply to the OP.
Since his were the second and third replies originally, and within
minutes of each other, I doubt he paid it much mind. Plus, it wouldn't
have made any sense to make that statement vis a vis the original
post.
> This is obvious yet it doesn't surprise you would choose to argue in
>opposition and in favor of chronological ordering which destroys any
>subthreading. I wonder if this is why you often appear confused?
Well, since I don't use Google to read posts, and RARELY use subthread
ordering, it's irrelevant.
BTW, it was YOU who was confused in this case. So, it looks like you
might reevaluate your OWN reading habits.
George M. Middius
July 9th 05, 07:16 PM
The Terrierborg has a solution for his pervasive miasma of all-encompassing
confusion.
> George could have avoided this by posting a reply to his post rather
> than a reply to the OP.
Avoid it? Ha! I relish it.
I don't care if idiots like you can't find my posts. Oh wait, you did find
it. What exactly are you complaining about? Your applesauce wasn't strained
fine enough, maybe?
Howard Ferstler
July 9th 05, 07:41 PM
dave weil wrote:
>
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:30:52 -0400, Howard Ferstler
> > wrote:
>
> >"George M. Middius" wrote:
> >>
> >> and golf, although I'm not very good.
> >
> >Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
> >footnote submitted by "George." Keep your names straight
> >when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
> >
> >Howard Ferstler
>
> You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
> was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
> (under his OWN name), which followed Maggie's initial post.
>
> Please try to keep up.
Not as I trace the thread. He did post his hobbies in
response to "her" initial question, but the follow-up
posting is attached to Margaret's original and not to his
initial response. That tells me that George and Margaret may
be the same person and that he got a bit mixed up during the
series. Of course, calling either of them a "person" is
heaping on the praise, since both are jerks.
Howard Ferstler
Howard Ferstler
George M. Middius
July 9th 05, 07:50 PM
Brother Horace the Persistently Clueless is on the case.
> Not as I trace the thread. He did post his hobbies in
> response to "her" initial question, but the follow-up
> posting is attached to Margaret's original and not to his
> initial response. That tells me that George and Margaret may
> be the same person and that he got a bit mixed up during the
> series.
With cluelessness like this, who needs Alzheimer's?
Clyde Slick
July 9th 05, 08:19 PM
"ScottW" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Chronological ordering of posts would be a disaster in organization.
> Subthtread structuring pushes it further and further from the original
> post. Anyone replying to his first or replies to replies are inserted
> between. This is structuring that Outlook, Google, Free Agent all use
> as default.
>
> George could have avoided this by posting a reply to his post rather
> than a reply to the OP.
>
> This is obvious yet it doesn't surprise you would choose to argue in
> opposition and in favor of chronological ordering which destroys any
> subthreading. I wonder if this is why you often appear confused?
>
> ScottW
>
There are things one knows one is confused about,
and there are things one doesn't know one is confused about,
but one should not be so confused as to not know the difference between the
two.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Clyde Slick
July 9th 05, 08:23 PM
"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
...
>
> Not as I trace the thread. He did post his hobbies in
> response to "her" initial question, but the follow-up
> posting is attached to Margaret's original and not to his
> initial response. That tells me that George and Margaret may
> be the same person and that he got a bit mixed up during the
> series. Of course, calling either of them a "person" is
> heaping on the praise, since both are jerks.
>
> Howard Ferstler
>
Oh boy! If that is true, it increases my chance of getting a date with
Maggie astronomically!
plus, I'll get to see George's art collection.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
ScottW
July 9th 05, 08:23 PM
George M. Middius wrote:
> The Terrierborg has a solution for his pervasive miasma of all-encompassing
> confusion.
>
> > George could have avoided this by posting a reply to his post rather
> > than a reply to the OP.
>
> Avoid it? Ha! I relish it.
>
> I don't care if idiots like you can't find my posts. Oh wait, you did find
> it. What exactly are you complaining about? Your applesauce wasn't strained
> fine enough, maybe?
Yet you have the hypocrisy to complain about top posting.
There's some real turds floating about but you plug the drain.
ScottW
George M. Middius
July 9th 05, 08:32 PM
Clyde Slick said:
> Oh boy! If that is true, it increases my chance of getting a date with
> Maggie astronomically!
> plus, I'll get to see George's art collection.
Whose beers are you drinking?
Howard Ferstler
July 9th 05, 08:33 PM
"George M. Middius" wrote:
>
> Brother Horace the Persistently Clueless is on the case.
>
> > Not as I trace the thread. He did post his hobbies in
> > response to "her" initial question, but the follow-up
> > posting is attached to Margaret's original and not to his
> > initial response. That tells me that George and Margaret may
> > be the same person and that he got a bit mixed up during the
> > series.
> With cluelessness like this, who needs Alzheimer's?
Keep dodging, tweako.
Howard Ferstler
George M. Middius
July 9th 05, 08:35 PM
Yappity-yappity-yap.
> > I don't care if idiots like you can't find my posts. Oh wait, you did find
> > it. What exactly are you complaining about? Your applesauce wasn't strained
> > fine enough, maybe?
>
> Yet you have the hypocrisy to complain about top posting.
Maybe you can explain how this is not a nonsequitur and how you're not
digging yourself in deeper with every post.
Clyde Slick
July 9th 05, 08:52 PM
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>> Oh boy! If that is true, it increases my chance of getting a date with
>> Maggie astronomically!
>> plus, I'll get to see George's art collection.
>
> Whose beers are you drinking?
>
My Ferstlerian logic escapes you?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
George M. Middius
July 9th 05, 08:56 PM
Poor, sad little Audio Clown. Nobody will explain the simplest things to
him.
> > With cluelessness like this, who needs Alzheimer's?
> Please sir, may I have some more?
Monday is laundry day at Krooger's hovel. If you hurry, you may get to sniff
some of Arnii's dirty shorts.
GeoSynch
July 9th 05, 09:16 PM
Clyde Slick wrote:
> There are things one knows one is confused about,
> and there are things one doesn't know one is confused about,
> but one should not be so confused as to not know the
> difference between the two.
How'd they ever fit that in a fortune cookie?
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 9th 05, 09:29 PM
dave weil wrote:
>>Just a rhetorical tear-gas canister to see whether
>>you'd compromise on your ethical integrity...
> Yep, I knew that. It's disappointing that you would do it.
Big difference, Dave. My research was based on publicly available
information, namely, your memorable exchange with trotsky in
which I distinctly remembered the "live jazz" mention. What made
that exchange memorable was when trotsky temporarily stopped
posting, and you replied to your own posts as though trotsky with
the devastating precision of trotsky's thought process and posting
method. My research did not rely whatsoever on private information.
> I'm still surprised that people would draw an ethical line over me
> posting something that made Lionel sound reasonable simply because it
> was a private post. Shows how out of whack things are here.
> So, here's an apology - I'm sorry Lionel. I shouldn't have disrupted
> your annoying personna. You just carry on however you want to - it's
> your personna after all.
Thanks for that.
GeoSynch
dave weil
July 9th 05, 09:42 PM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 20:29:25 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>dave weil wrote:
>
>>>Just a rhetorical tear-gas canister to see whether
>>>you'd compromise on your ethical integrity...
>
>> Yep, I knew that. It's disappointing that you would do it.
>
>Big difference, Dave. My research was based on publicly available
>information, namely, your memorable exchange with trotsky in
>which I distinctly remembered the "live jazz" mention. What made
>that exchange memorable was when trotsky temporarily stopped
>posting, and you replied to your own posts as though trotsky with
>the devastating precision of trotsky's thought process and posting
>method. My research did not rely whatsoever on private information.
You seem confused. I don't give a rat's ass about what 'research" you
might have done, regardless of how much "incomplete infromation" it
may have been based on.
It's disappointing that you would try to bait me into revealing your
REAL name (with you ACTUALLY disclosing it in the process, as well)
because you want to support an asshole who feigns moral outrage over
what's going on on RAO while perpertrating the same sort of behavior
that he decries.
>> I'm still surprised that people would draw an ethical line over me
>> posting something that made Lionel sound reasonable simply because it
>> was a private post. Shows how out of whack things are here.
>
>> So, here's an apology - I'm sorry Lionel. I shouldn't have disrupted
>> your annoying personna. You just carry on however you want to - it's
>> your personna after all.
>
>Thanks for that.
Yeah, right.
GeoSynch
July 9th 05, 09:52 PM
dave weil wrote:
> It's disappointing that you would try to bait me into revealing your
> REAL name (with you ACTUALLY disclosing it in the process, as well)
You hinted at it, without any rhyme or reason, to my reply to Tom's post.
> because you want to support an asshole who feigns moral outrage over
> what's going on on RAO while perpertrating the same sort of behavior
> that he decries.
Who's feigning moral outrage now?
GeoSynch
George M. Middius
July 9th 05, 09:56 PM
Clyde Slick said:
> >> Oh boy! If that is true, it increases my chance of getting a date with
> >> Maggie astronomically!
> >> plus, I'll get to see George's art collection.
> >
> > Whose beers are you drinking?
> My Ferstlerian logic escapes you?
Not at all. It's you who's not keeping up.
dave weil
July 9th 05, 09:58 PM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 20:52:42 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>dave weil wrote:
>
>> It's disappointing that you would try to bait me into revealing your
>> REAL name (with you ACTUALLY disclosing it in the process, as well)
>
>You hinted at it, without any rhyme or reason, to my reply to Tom's post.
How do you figure?
>> because you want to support an asshole who feigns moral outrage over
>> what's going on on RAO while perpertrating the same sort of behavior
>> that he decries.
>
>Who's feigning moral outrage now?
Not me, THAT'S for sure.
GeoSynch
July 9th 05, 10:09 PM
>>dave weil wrote:
>>> It's disappointing that you would try to bait me into revealing your
>>> REAL name (with you ACTUALLY disclosing it in the process, as well)
>>You hinted at it, without any rhyme or reason, to my reply to Tom's post.
> How do you figure?
Excerpt:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[Tom]: who are you?
[Me]: I am me, that's who.
[Tom]: should I know you by another name?
[Me]: Perhaps if you put on your thinking cap and gave it a whirl...
[You]: You're not trying to bait me into revealing your real name, are you?
------------------------------------------------------------------
End of excerpt:
What did Tom's question and my response have to do with you?
>>> because you want to support an asshole who feigns moral outrage over
>>> what's going on on RAO while perpertrating the same sort of behavior
>>> that he decries.
>>Who's feigning moral outrage now?
> Not me, THAT'S for sure.
Thought I smelt some martyr burning - could've been Uncle Fester.
GeoSynch
dave weil
July 9th 05, 10:29 PM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 21:09:24 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>>>dave weil wrote:
>
>>>> It's disappointing that you would try to bait me into revealing your
>>>> REAL name (with you ACTUALLY disclosing it in the process, as well)
>
>>>You hinted at it, without any rhyme or reason, to my reply to Tom's post.
>
>> How do you figure?
>
>Excerpt:
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>[Tom]: who are you?
>
>[Me]: I am me, that's who.
>
>[Tom]: should I know you by another name?
>
>[Me]: Perhaps if you put on your thinking cap and gave it a whirl...
>
>[You]: You're not trying to bait me into revealing your real name, are you?
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>End of excerpt:
>
>What did Tom's question and my response have to do with you?
It had to do with the the statement, "Perhaps if you put on your
thinking cap and gave it a whirl..."this seemed to me to be an attempt
to get me to "give the game away", and, as it turned out, it WAS, by
your own admission.
Are you now saying that, with the context of the past couple of days,
this statement wasn't meant as a baited hook for me?
>>>> because you want to support an asshole who feigns moral outrage over
>>>> what's going on on RAO while perpertrating the same sort of behavior
>>>> that he decries.
>
>>>Who's feigning moral outrage now?
>
>> Not me, THAT'S for sure.
>
>Thought I smelt some martyr burning - could've been Uncle Fester.
Probably.
If you'd like, I'll be glad to pass along what you disclosed to me
privately. Just give me the word, and I'll be happy to quote you.
GeoSynch
July 9th 05, 10:40 PM
dave weil wrote:
> If you'd like, I'll be glad to pass along what you disclosed to me
> privately. Just give me the word, and I'll be happy to quote you.
Please keep any private exchanges confidential and let's let it go at that.
GeoSynch
ScottW
July 9th 05, 10:42 PM
dave weil wrote:
> On 9 Jul 2005 10:47:07 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >dave weil wrote:
> >> On 7 Jul 2005 17:14:46 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Says me. Look at the Google thread and see your disconnected "and
> >> >golf" post isn't even on the same page as your first post.
> >>
> >> So google has a strange tree structure. On my newsreader, it's the
> >> third post chronologically, as indeed it was in the thread.
> >
> >Chronological ordering of posts would be a disaster in organization.
>
> It's not when you regularly read a newsgroup.
Lack of a life...noted.
> And since I CAN choose
> to use a tree structure when I need to, it's not a big deal.
>
> > Subthtread structuring pushes it further and further from the original
> >post. Anyone replying to his first or replies to replies are inserted
> >between. This is structuring that Outlook, Google, Free Agent all use
> >as default.
>
> *My* defaultin Agent is chronolgical.
Is this one of those relative truths you proclaim?
There is no *My* default... only *A* default and chronological isn't
it.
> I only choose a tree structure
> when going back weeks to try to find a specific post.
>
> >George could have avoided this by posting a reply to his post rather
> >than a reply to the OP.
>
> Since his were the second and third replies originally, and within
> minutes of each other, I doubt he paid it much mind.
Or has much mind to pay it.
> Plus, it wouldn't
> have made any sense to make that statement vis a vis the original
> post.
Correct... so why make it a reply to the original... it was an
addendum to his post.
>
> > This is obvious yet it doesn't surprise you would choose to argue in
> >opposition and in favor of chronological ordering which destroys any
> >subthreading. I wonder if this is why you often appear confused?
>
> Well, since I don't use Google to read posts, and RARELY use subthread
> ordering, it's irrelevant.
>
> BTW, it was YOU who was confused in this case. So, it looks like you
> might reevaluate your OWN reading habits.
You really want to reduce your argument to an "am not, you are"
statement?
ScottW
ScottW
July 9th 05, 11:08 PM
George M. Middius wrote:
> Yappity-yappity-yap.
>
> > > I don't care if idiots like you can't find my posts. Oh wait, you did find
> > > it. What exactly are you complaining about? Your applesauce wasn't strained
> > > fine enough, maybe?
> >
> > Yet you have the hypocrisy to complain about top posting.
>
> Maybe you can explain how this is not a nonsequitur and how you're not
> digging yourself in deeper with every post.
Request for the obvious noted.
Top posters surely won't care if idiots like you can't find their
posts...
Is that enough of a hint to face your hypocrisy? I doubt it.
ScottW
Margaret von B.
July 9th 05, 11:19 PM
"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
...
> dave weil wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:30:52 -0400, Howard Ferstler
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >"George M. Middius" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> and golf, although I'm not very good.
>> >
>> >Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
>> >footnote submitted by "George." Keep your names straight
>> >when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
>> >
>> >Howard Ferstler
>>
>> You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
>> was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
>> (under his OWN name), which followed Maggie's initial post.
>>
>> Please try to keep up.
>
> Not as I trace the thread. He did post his hobbies in
> response to "her" initial question, but the follow-up
> posting is attached to Margaret's original and not to his
> initial response. That tells me that George and Margaret may
> be the same person
I hear Simpleton is looking for a new mayor. You should definitely apply.
:-)
Cheers,
Margaret
George M. Middius
July 9th 05, 11:27 PM
Dorkbot alert!
> > Yappity-yappity-yap.
> >
> > > > I don't care if idiots like you can't find my posts. Oh wait, you did find
> > > > it. What exactly are you complaining about? Your applesauce wasn't strained
> > > > fine enough, maybe?
> > >
> > > Yet you have the hypocrisy to complain about top posting.
> >
> > Maybe you can explain how this is not a nonsequitur and how you're not
> > digging yourself in deeper with every post.
>
> Request for the obvious noted.
> Top posters surely won't care if idiots like you can't find their
> posts...
Wow. It gets denser and denser with every passing week.
> Is that enough of a hint to face your hypocrisy? I doubt it.
But Scooter, I never top-post. Are you confused again?
Margaret von B.
July 9th 05, 11:30 PM
"Margaret von B." > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
> ...
>> dave weil wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:30:52 -0400, Howard Ferstler
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >"George M. Middius" wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> and golf, although I'm not very good.
>>> >
>>> >Hey, you initially posted this as Margaret, with this little
>>> >footnote submitted by "George." Keep your names straight
>>> >when you operate as a sockpuppet, tweako.
>>> >
>>> >Howard Ferstler
>>>
>>> You need to keep YOUR people straight, since this is something that
>>> was posted only by George. It was a footnote to his previous posting
>>> (under his OWN name), which followed Maggie's initial post.
>>>
>>> Please try to keep up.
>>
>> Not as I trace the thread. He did post his hobbies in
>> response to "her" initial question, but the follow-up
>> posting is attached to Margaret's original and not to his
>> initial response. That tells me that George and Margaret may
>> be the same person
>
> I hear Simpleton is looking for a new mayor. You should definitely apply.
> :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Margaret
>
That was a good one, Margaret!
George
George M. Middius
July 9th 05, 11:40 PM
Margaret von B. said:
> > I hear Simpleton is looking for a new mayor. You should definitely apply.
> > :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Margaret
> >
>
> That was a good one, Margaret!
>
> George
Thank you George. You know how to flatter a woman just right! <big kiss>
Margaret
ScottW
July 10th 05, 12:48 AM
George M. Middius wrote:
> Margaret von B. said:
>
> > > I hear Simpleton is looking for a new mayor. You should definitely apply.
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Margaret
> > >
> >
> > That was a good one, Margaret!
> >
> > George
>
> Thank you George. You know how to flatter a woman just right! <big kiss>
uuuh... George will be back in moment... he had to go hurl.
ScottW
ScottW
July 10th 05, 12:56 AM
George M. Middius wrote:
> Dorkbot alert!
>
> > > Yappity-yappity-yap.
> > >
> > > > > I don't care if idiots like you can't find my posts. Oh wait, you did find
> > > > > it. What exactly are you complaining about? Your applesauce wasn't strained
> > > > > fine enough, maybe?
> > > >
> > > > Yet you have the hypocrisy to complain about top posting.
> > >
> > > Maybe you can explain how this is not a nonsequitur and how you're not
> > > digging yourself in deeper with every post.
> >
> > Request for the obvious noted.
> > Top posters surely won't care if idiots like you can't find their
> > posts...
>
> Wow. It gets denser and denser with every passing week.
>
> > Is that enough of a hint to face your hypocrisy? I doubt it.
>
> But Scooter, I never top-post. Are you confused again?
Total logic failure noted. I suggest you consider having yourself
declared incompetent.
ScottW
dave weil
July 10th 05, 01:45 AM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 21:40:11 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>dave weil wrote:
>
>> If you'd like, I'll be glad to pass along what you disclosed to me
>> privately. Just give me the word, and I'll be happy to quote you.
>
>Please keep any private exchanges confidential and let's let it go at that.
Then please stop baiting me.
dave weil
July 10th 05, 01:52 AM
On 9 Jul 2005 14:42:49 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>
>dave weil wrote:
>> On 9 Jul 2005 10:47:07 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >dave weil wrote:
>> >> On 7 Jul 2005 17:14:46 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Says me. Look at the Google thread and see your disconnected "and
>> >> >golf" post isn't even on the same page as your first post.
>> >>
>> >> So google has a strange tree structure. On my newsreader, it's the
>> >> third post chronologically, as indeed it was in the thread.
>> >
>> >Chronological ordering of posts would be a disaster in organization.
>>
>> It's not when you regularly read a newsgroup.
>
> Lack of a life...noted.
Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
>> And since I CAN choose
>> to use a tree structure when I need to, it's not a big deal.
>>
>> > Subthtread structuring pushes it further and further from the original
>> >post. Anyone replying to his first or replies to replies are inserted
>> >between. This is structuring that Outlook, Google, Free Agent all use
>> >as default.
>>
>> *My* default in Agent is chronolgical.
>
> Is this one of those relative truths you proclaim?
>
> There is no *My* default... only *A* default and chronological isn't
>it.
No sir, I HAVE a default, whether you like it or not.
>> I only choose a tree structure
>> when going back weeks to try to find a specific post.
>>
>> >George could have avoided this by posting a reply to his post rather
>> >than a reply to the OP.
>>
>> Since his were the second and third replies originally, and within
>> minutes of each other, I doubt he paid it much mind.
>
>
> Or has much mind to pay it.
Funny how you're hanging out in this newgroup on a Saturday afternoon.
what is it you said about "a life"?
>> Plus, it wouldn't
>> have made any sense to make that statement vis a vis the original
>> post.
>
> Correct... so why make it a reply to the original... it was an
>addendum to his post.
Because he might have simply repeated his original action before his
original reply had shown up on the group, perhaps? Perhaps, he made
the addenum "on the spot", as it were?
Tht would make too much sense for you to understand though.
>> > This is obvious yet it doesn't surprise you would choose to argue in
>> >opposition and in favor of chronological ordering which destroys any
>> >subthreading. I wonder if this is why you often appear confused?
>>
>> Well, since I don't use Google to read posts, and RARELY use subthread
>> ordering, it's irrelevant.
>>
>> BTW, it was YOU who was confused in this case. So, it looks like you
>> might reevaluate your OWN reading habits.
>
> You really want to reduce your argument to an "am not, you are"
>statement?
Hell, *I* got it right, and you didn't. That's *your* problem, not
mine.
dave weil
July 10th 05, 02:02 AM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 22:19:16 GMT, "Margaret von B."
> wrote:
>I hear Simpleton is looking for a new mayor. You should definitely apply.
>:-)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Margaret
Gratuitous XTC reference noted.
ScottW
July 10th 05, 02:27 AM
dave weil wrote:
> On 9 Jul 2005 14:42:49 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >dave weil wrote:
> >> On 9 Jul 2005 10:47:07 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >dave weil wrote:
> >> >> On 7 Jul 2005 17:14:46 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Says me. Look at the Google thread and see your disconnected "and
> >> >> >golf" post isn't even on the same page as your first post.
> >> >>
> >> >> So google has a strange tree structure. On my newsreader, it's the
> >> >> third post chronologically, as indeed it was in the thread.
> >> >
> >> >Chronological ordering of posts would be a disaster in organization.
> >>
> >> It's not when you regularly read a newsgroup.
> >
> > Lack of a life...noted.
>
> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
Well a fine family gathering is a joy your life apparently lacks or you
wouldn't dismiss it so hastily.
>
> >> And since I CAN choose
> >> to use a tree structure when I need to, it's not a big deal.
> >>
> >> > Subthtread structuring pushes it further and further from the original
> >> >post. Anyone replying to his first or replies to replies are inserted
> >> >between. This is structuring that Outlook, Google, Free Agent all use
> >> >as default.
> >>
> >> *My* default in Agent is chronolgical.
> >
> > Is this one of those relative truths you proclaim?
> >
> > There is no *My* default... only *A* default and chronological isn't
> >it.
>
> No sir, I HAVE a default, whether you like it or not.
The default is the state it comes up in upon install,
no matter how hard you stamp your feet and say it isn't so.
>
> >> I only choose a tree structure
> >> when going back weeks to try to find a specific post.
> >>
> >> >George could have avoided this by posting a reply to his post rather
> >> >than a reply to the OP.
> >>
> >> Since his were the second and third replies originally, and within
> >> minutes of each other, I doubt he paid it much mind.
> >
> >
> > Or has much mind to pay it.
>
> Funny how you're hanging out in this newgroup on a Saturday afternoon.
> what is it you said about "a life"?
Kickin it on a Sat afternoon after a nice party into the wee hours
isn't such a terrible thing.
I was gettin a little too much sun snoozin on a floater in the pool.
>
> >> Plus, it wouldn't
> >> have made any sense to make that statement vis a vis the original
> >> post.
> >
> > Correct... so why make it a reply to the original... it was an
> >addendum to his post.
>
> Because he might have simply repeated his original action before his
> original reply had shown up on the group, perhaps?
And you have gall to claim this statement makes too much sense?
Oh... I see... the latest debating trade.... say something truly
absurd and declare it over their heads.
If you think such tactics can save a little face... it just shows how
little face you have to save.
> Perhaps, he made
> the addenum "on the spot", as it were?
>
> Tht would make too much sense for you to understand though.
>
> >> > This is obvious yet it doesn't surprise you would choose to argue in
> >> >opposition and in favor of chronological ordering which destroys any
> >> >subthreading. I wonder if this is why you often appear confused?
> >>
> >> Well, since I don't use Google to read posts, and RARELY use subthread
> >> ordering, it's irrelevant.
> >>
> >> BTW, it was YOU who was confused in this case. So, it looks like you
> >> might reevaluate your OWN reading habits.
> >
> > You really want to reduce your argument to an "am not, you are"
> >statement?
>
> Hell, *I* got it right, and you didn't. That's *your* problem, not
> mine.
All the *s in the heavens can't make it so.
... and again you have failed to make any substantial support of your
argument to validate your declarations. So another one bites the dust
in just the same way as so many have bitten the dust before it.
ScottW
dave weil
July 10th 05, 02:39 AM
On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
>
> Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
Failure to note the word "my" noted.
Clyde Slick
July 10th 05, 02:43 AM
"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>>> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
>>
>> Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
>
> Failure to note the word "my" noted.
My, my, my!
Is this what it all boils down to?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
dave weil
July 10th 05, 02:46 AM
On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>> >> *My* default in Agent is chronolgical.
>> >
>> > Is this one of those relative truths you proclaim?
>> >
>> > There is no *My* default... only *A* default and chronological isn't
>> >it.
>>
>> No sir, I HAVE a default, whether you like it or not.
>
> The default is the state it comes up in upon install,
>no matter how hard you stamp your feet and say it isn't so.
No, default is the state it comes up in upon loading. Defaults are
choosable.
You lose.
Again.
Frankly, I have no idea what the default was at the time that I
installed Agent, but I've kept it sorted by date 99% of the time.
Sorry you dont approve, or have to use Google because you don't have a
decent newsreader, but that's *your* problem, not mine.
dave weil
July 10th 05, 02:46 AM
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 21:43:59 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
> wrote:
>
>"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>> On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>
>>>> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
>>>
>>> Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
>>
>> Failure to note the word "my" noted.
>
>My, my, my!
>Is this what it all boils down to?
No no, not boil. Grill.
George M. Middius
July 10th 05, 03:08 AM
Clyde Slick said:
> > Failure to note the word "my" noted.
>
> My, my, my!
That sounds like sarcasm. So now you're a pinko?
ScottW
July 10th 05, 03:10 AM
dave weil wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 21:43:59 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
> >>>
> >>> Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
> >>
> >> Failure to note the word "my" noted.
> >
> >My, my, my!
> >Is this what it all boils down to?
>
> No no, not boil. Grill.
Occasionally broiled :)
ScottW
ScottW
July 10th 05, 03:15 AM
dave weil wrote:
> On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> >> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
> >
> > Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
>
> Failure to note the word "my" noted.
Oh... then your life could be "less" than random BBQs.
I don't know of anyone who wouldn't be better off with more BBQs :)
ScottW
ScottW
July 10th 05, 03:32 AM
dave weil wrote:
> On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> >> >> *My* default in Agent is chronolgical.
> >> >
> >> > Is this one of those relative truths you proclaim?
> >> >
> >> > There is no *My* default... only *A* default and chronological isn't
> >> >it.
> >>
> >> No sir, I HAVE a default, whether you like it or not.
> >
> > The default is the state it comes up in upon install,
> >no matter how hard you stamp your feet and say it isn't so.
>
> No, default is the state it comes up in upon loading. Defaults are
> choosable.
>
> You lose.
>
> Again.
Wanna bet?
From M-W.com
default : a selection automatically used by a computer program in the
absence of a choice made by the user
Now one would think Dave, you could at least crack a dictionary before
making another uninformed declaration of victory..... again.
>
> Frankly, I have no idea what the default was at the time that I
> installed Agent,
and now you just contradict yourself....
> but I've kept it sorted by date 99% of the time.
> Sorry you dont approve, or have to use Google because you don't have a
> decent newsreader, but that's *your* problem, not mine.
I have Free Agent... don't like it. OE sucks. Google used to be
delayed but is now real time and works pretty well. If you haven't
used it lately you might try it. You've chosen to buy Agent and thats
fine, I've chosen not too spend for usenet :).
ScottW
dave weil
July 10th 05, 03:46 AM
On 9 Jul 2005 19:15:27 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>dave weil wrote:
>> On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>
>> >> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
>> >
>> > Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
>>
>> Failure to note the word "my" noted.
>
> Oh... then your life could be "less" than random BBQs.
Uhhh, no.
Are you ALWAYS this dense or is it just clogged arteries of the brain?
Clyde Slick
July 10th 05, 03:52 AM
"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>
> You lose.
>
> Again.
>
You've declared victory more times than Al Gore.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Clyde Slick
July 10th 05, 03:54 AM
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>> > Failure to note the word "my" noted.
>>
>> My, my, my!
>
> That sounds like sarcasm. So now you're a pinko?
>
I Yustabe.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
ScottW
July 10th 05, 04:02 AM
dave weil wrote:
> On 9 Jul 2005 19:15:27 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> >dave weil wrote:
> >> On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
> >> >
> >> > Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
> >>
> >> Failure to note the word "my" noted.
> >
> > Oh... then your life could be "less" than random BBQs.
>
> Uhhh, no.
Uhhhh, yes... random BBQs could bring more to life. You see...it
simply isn't your call to make. Unless you're an elitist that is. Then
it still isn't, but you would just think it is.
>
> Are you ALWAYS this dense or is it just clogged arteries of the brain?
There's that elitism again. Is it density or simple truth?
Let's have a BBQ and discuss it :)
ScottW
George M. Middius
July 10th 05, 04:06 AM
dave weil said:
> > Oh... then your life could be "less" than random BBQs.
> Uhhh, no.
> Are you ALWAYS this dense or is it just clogged arteries of the brain?
Scottie's obtuseness might be the result of proximity to the Bug Eater.
ScottW
July 10th 05, 04:33 AM
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> dave weil said:
>
>> > Oh... then your life could be "less" than random BBQs.
>
>> Uhhh, no.
>> Are you ALWAYS this dense or is it just clogged arteries of the brain?
>
> Scottie's obtuseness might be the result of proximity to the Bug Eater.
No bugs at our BBQ... one of the unsung benefits of SD :)
Well... maybe a few Argentine ants... see even the f'ing ants are illegal
out here.
ScottW
Clyde Slick
July 10th 05, 04:38 AM
"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:oG0Ae.31636$up5.18878@lakeread02...
>
> No bugs at our BBQ... one of the unsung benefits of SD :)
> Well... maybe a few Argentine ants... see even the f'ing ants are illegal
> out here.
>
BTW, do you think that duh Mikey is a hypocrite?
Does he eat undocumented bugs?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
ScottW
July 10th 05, 04:44 AM
"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> news:oG0Ae.31636$up5.18878@lakeread02...
>>
>
>
>> No bugs at our BBQ... one of the unsung benefits of SD :)
>> Well... maybe a few Argentine ants... see even the f'ing ants are illegal
>> out here.
>>
>
> BTW, do you think that duh Mikey is a hypocrite?
> Does he eat undocumented bugs?
That would imply intent :)
ScottW
GeoSynch
July 10th 05, 05:10 AM
dave weil wrote:
>>Please keep any private exchanges confidential and let's let it go at that.
> Then please stop baiting me.
Yeah, I know you're as egocentric as the next guy around here, but if you
think my response to Tom (who probably suspected I was Haugen or
trotsky) was somehow written merely to bait you, then you've crossed
over into the delusional strata occupied by rao's two most prolific posters.
It may be time for an overdue reality check.
GeoSynch
Lionel
July 10th 05, 07:41 AM
dave "crybaby" weil a écrit :
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:56:56 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>dave weil wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
>>
>>>Sorry, not biting.
>>
>>Just a rhetorical tear-gas canister to see whether
>>you'd compromise on your ethical integrity...
>
>
> Yep, I knew that. It's disappointing that you would do it.
>
> I'm still surprised that people would draw an ethical line over me
> posting something that made Lionel sound reasonable simply because it
> was a private post.
Just a question of habit, you have posted so many "private"
things before... ;-)
> Shows how out of whack things are here.
Mainly thank to your twisted contribution, baby.
> So, here's an apology - I'm sorry Lionel. I shouldn't have disrupted
> your annoying personna. You just carry on however you want to - it's
> your personna after all.
Don't worry small man it's not a problem for me.
IMHO after our last discussion you'd better apologize to
Dave Weil. :-D
Lionel
July 10th 05, 07:44 AM
Middius' shadows wrote :
> "dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:56:56 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>dave weil wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
>>>
>>>>Sorry, not biting.
>>>
>>>Just a rhetorical tear-gas canister to see whether
>>>you'd compromise on your ethical integrity...
>>
>>Yep, I knew that. It's disappointing that you would do it.
>>
>>I'm still surprised that people would draw an ethical line over me
>>posting something that made Lionel sound reasonable simply because it
>>was a private post. Shows how out of whack things are here.
>>
>>So, here's an apology - I'm sorry Lionel. I shouldn't have disrupted
>>your annoying personna. You just carry on however you want to - it's
>>your personna after all.
>>
>
>
> it's a persona non grata
....and your belongs to Middius. :-D
sam
July 10th 05, 07:59 AM
"GeoSynch" > wrote
> Yeah, I know you're as egocentric as the next guy around here, but if you
> think my response to Tom (who probably suspected I was Haugen or
> trotsky)..........
Have we met in person? First name initial "J" ?
btw, I'd be really disappointed if you were Haugen, and
I wasn't suspecting trotsky.
GeoSynch
July 10th 05, 08:12 AM
Tom wrote:
> Have we met in person?
No.
> First name initial "J" ?
No.
> btw, I'd be really disappointed if you were Haugen, and
> I wasn't suspecting trotsky.
Who then?
GeoSynch
Lionel
July 10th 05, 08:28 AM
GeoStink wrote :
> Pepe LePuke drooled:
>
>
>>>Ribbit.
>
>
>>Schizophrenic.
>
>
> Moronic.
It was nostalgy ?
Sorry, it's not schizophrenia just geriatric desorder. :-)
GeoSynch
July 10th 05, 08:30 AM
Frenchy's fried:
> It was nostalgy ?
> Sorry, it's not schizophrenia just geriatric desorder. :-)
Whatever.
GeoSynch
Sander deWaal
July 10th 05, 01:27 PM
"ScottW" > said:
> I don't know of anyone who wouldn't be better off with more BBQs :)
Bwian McCarty.
--
"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005
Clyde Slick
July 10th 05, 02:31 PM
"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Middius' shadows wrote :
>
>> "dave weil" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:56:56 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>dave weil wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Did I mention it or merely allude to it?
>>>>
>>>>>Sorry, not biting.
>>>>
>>>>Just a rhetorical tear-gas canister to see whether
>>>>you'd compromise on your ethical integrity...
>>>
>>>Yep, I knew that. It's disappointing that you would do it.
>>>
>>>I'm still surprised that people would draw an ethical line over me
>>>posting something that made Lionel sound reasonable simply because it
>>>was a private post. Shows how out of whack things are here.
>>>
>>>So, here's an apology - I'm sorry Lionel. I shouldn't have disrupted
>>>your annoying personna. You just carry on however you want to - it's
>>>your personna after all.
>>>
>>
>>
>> it's a persona non grata
>
> ...and your belongs to Middius. :-D
gibberish
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
sam
July 10th 05, 02:38 PM
"GeoSynch" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> Tom wrote:
>
>> Have we met in person?
>
> No.
>
>> First name initial "J" ?
>
> No.
"B" ?
dave weil
July 10th 05, 02:52 PM
On 9 Jul 2005 19:32:52 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>> No, default is the state it comes up in upon loading. Defaults are
>> choosable.
>>
>> You lose.
>>
>> Again.
>
> Wanna bet?
>
> From M-W.com
>
>default : a selection automatically used by a computer program in the
>absence of a choice made by the user
>
>Now one would think Dave, you could at least crack a dictionary before
>making another uninformed declaration of victory..... again.
So, when I load the program and don't change the state it's in myself,
the computer has chosen the state that it's in, and that's MY default.
Notice that there's NOTHING in your definition about "installation".
dave weil
July 10th 05, 02:56 PM
On 9 Jul 2005 19:32:52 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>> Frankly, I have no idea what the default was at the time that I
>> installed Agent,
>
> and now you just contradict yourself....
No, I don't. For me, the default is the state of the program when I
load it (and use it). If I wish to change it, I *will*, and if I leave
it there when I close the program down, *it* becomes the defult, until
I change it again.
>> but I've kept it sorted by date 99% of the time.
>> Sorry you dont approve, or have to use Google because you don't have a
>> decent newsreader, but that's *your* problem, not mine.
> I have Free Agent... don't like it. OE sucks. Google used to be
>delayed but is now real time and works pretty well. If you haven't
>used it lately you might try it. You've chosen to buy Agent and thats
>fine, I've chosen not too spend for usenet :).
I use Google if I need to do reserch. Otherwise, I prefer to use
Agent, which, as you don't seem to know, I use for mail as well as
USENET. I would have chosen a third party program for mail in any
case. USENET is just a bonus.
MINe 109
July 10th 05, 03:07 PM
In article >,
"Clyde Slick" > wrote:
> > ...and your belongs to Middius. :-D
>
> gibberish
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_your_base_are_belong_to_us
Stephen
dave weil
July 10th 05, 03:16 PM
On 9 Jul 2005 20:02:19 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>
>dave weil wrote:
>> On 9 Jul 2005 19:15:27 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>
>> >dave weil wrote:
>> >> On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
>> >> >
>> >> > Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
>> >>
>> >> Failure to note the word "my" noted.
>> >
>> > Oh... then your life could be "less" than random BBQs.
>>
>> Uhhh, no.
>
> Uhhhh, yes... random BBQs could bring more to life. You see...it
>simply isn't your call to make. Unless you're an elitist that is. Then
>it still isn't, but you would just think it is.
You're as confused as Mr. Ferstler.
Your statement made no sense whatsoever.
>> Are you ALWAYS this dense or is it just clogged arteries of the brain?
>
> There's that elitism again. Is it density or simple truth?
It's simple truth that you are dense. I was speculating about the
effect of your high fat diet.
> Let's have a BBQ and discuss it :)
Will you be on the spit?
dave weil
July 10th 05, 03:32 PM
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 04:10:38 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>dave weil wrote:
>
>>>Please keep any private exchanges confidential and let's let it go at that.
>
>> Then please stop baiting me.
>
>Yeah, I know you're as egocentric as the next guy around here, but if you
>think my response to Tom (who probably suspected I was Haugen or
>trotsky) was somehow written merely to bait you, then you've crossed
>over into the delusional strata occupied by rao's two most prolific posters.
You virtually admitted it yourself. And you know EXACTLY where the
bait was (if I'm specific, it will give the game away). I'm not
claiming that the post ITSELF was aimed at me, just some of the
specifics of the post, the post itself coinciding almost exactly with
the moral outrage of me posting Lionel's private post to me. Admit it,
you were trying to "teach me a lesson" in some bizarre way, or "prove"
that I'm willing to disclose personal information nilly-willy.
>It may be time for an overdue reality check.
Look in the mirror, my friend.
George M. Middius
July 10th 05, 03:34 PM
MINe 109 said:
> > > ...and your belongs to Middius. :-D
> >
> > gibberish
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_your_base_are_belong_to_us
Stephen: "EARLY INTERNET TRIVIA" for $600, Alex!
Alex: Thank you Stephen, and the answer is:
"All Your Base" was interesting in that it demonstrated the power of the
Internet to quickly spread idiosyncratic messages that would never have
been covered by the traditional mass media. Although the fad has since
died down, the phrase continues to be one of the most commonly quoted
examples of "Engrish".
Stephen: <BZZZ!>
Alex: Stephen!
Stephen: What is Sluttish?
dave weil
July 10th 05, 03:38 PM
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 07:12:47 GMT, "GeoSynch"
> wrote:
>Tom wrote:
>
>> Have we met in person?
>
>No.
>
>> First name initial "J" ?
>
>No.
>
>> btw, I'd be really disappointed if you were Haugen, and
>> I wasn't suspecting trotsky.
>
>Who then?
Hmmmm, interesting. You now feel the need to lie. That's interesting.
GeoSynch
July 10th 05, 10:54 PM
dave weil wrote:
> Hmmmm, interesting. You now feel the need to lie. That's interesting.
Not at all. I had written you 'my name means...', not 'my name is...."
I'm being truthful. You, on the other hand, have made statements
that you would not be capable of making without relying on private
information, which makes you not a man of your word.
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 10th 05, 10:55 PM
Tom is listing off the letters of the alphabet:
>>> Have we met in person?
>> No.
>>> First name initial "J" ?
>> No.
> "B" ?
You first. Why would you have disappointed if I was Haugen?
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 10th 05, 10:58 PM
dave weil wrote:
> You virtually admitted it yourself. And you know EXACTLY where the
> bait was (if I'm specific, it will give the game away). I'm not
> claiming that the post ITSELF was aimed at me, just some of the
> specifics of the post, the post itself coinciding almost exactly with
> the moral outrage of me posting Lionel's private post to me. Admit it,
> you were trying to "teach me a lesson" in some bizarre way, or "prove"
> that I'm willing to disclose personal information nilly-willy.
Nothing in that reply to Tom was written with you in mind. Not a word.
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 10th 05, 10:59 PM
Tom is listing off the letters of the alphabet:
>>> Have we met in person?
>> No.
>>> First name initial "J" ?
>> No.
> "B" ?
You first. Why would you have been disappointed if I was Haugen?
GeoSynch
sam
July 11th 05, 12:26 AM
"GeoSynch" > wrote
>
> You first. Why would you have disappointed if I was Haugen?
Because I consider Doug a friend.
You seem to be a bit hostile.
I do remember calling you Stink way back.
I don't remember why.
Honestly, I don't even know what your issues are now,
....other than George.
George M. Middius
July 11th 05, 01:01 AM
sam said to Stynchblob:
> Honestly, I don't even know what your issues are now,
> ...other than George.
Allow me to enlighten you. Styncho is terrified of "homos". He superimposes
his crack-brained religion over every social issue. He's stuck on the
Krooborg in a perverted way. He's an audio commie even though if he had a
pickup truck, he'd have a gun rack in it.
He grasps at tattered shreds of ideology because he can't face how
marginalized he is. He hates his job, but at bottom he realizes that a
misanthropic misfit like himself is lucky to have a steady paycheck. He
probably stays up nights worrying about his job being exported, and he tells
himself that white people will never shaft another white person just to save
a few bucks.
He hates arts and artistic people because, frankly, he doesn't get any of
it. He resents that he can't afford the nicest things. He feels that he has
a birthright to be treated royally. He probably fantasizes about lynching
some random nonwhite person like white men did in the good old days.
I'm sure there's more........
GeoSynch
July 11th 05, 01:30 AM
Tom wrote:
>> You first. Why would you have disappointed if I was Haugen?
> Because I consider Doug a friend.
That's interesting.
What are your thoughts on George's unwarranted attacks on Haugen?
> You seem to be a bit hostile.
That may have been precipated by namecalling.
> I do remember calling you Stink way back.
> I don't remember why.
> Honestly, I don't even know what your issues are now,
> ...other than George.
Let's go with truth, justice and the American way.
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 11th 05, 01:35 AM
The cognitive dissonance maelstrom roars wildly through
the Mid-Yut's twisted mind:
>> Honestly, I don't even know what your issues are now,
>> ...other than George.
> Allow me to enlighten you...
So, George, did you turn into a homo because women find
you so hideously repulsive?
GeoSynch
ScottW
July 11th 05, 02:27 AM
"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On 9 Jul 2005 19:32:52 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>>> No, default is the state it comes up in upon loading. Defaults are
>>> choosable.
>>>
>>> You lose.
>>>
>>> Again.
>>
>> Wanna bet?
>>
>> From M-W.com
>>
>>default : a selection automatically used by a computer program in the
>>absence of a choice made by the user
>>
>>Now one would think Dave, you could at least crack a dictionary before
>>making another uninformed declaration of victory..... again.
>
> So, when I load the program and don't change the state it's in myself,
> the computer has chosen the state that it's in, and that's MY default.
> Notice that there's NOTHING in your definition about "installation".
I give up Dave... have "your" defaults that you didn't choose or you
did you choose. I'm sure you'll be proud of your victory.
It's a minor thing compared to your other issues.
They are for more serious.
ScottW
ScottW
July 11th 05, 02:28 AM
"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On 9 Jul 2005 19:32:52 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>>> Frankly, I have no idea what the default was at the time that I
>>> installed Agent,
>>
>> and now you just contradict yourself....
>
> No, I don't. For me, the default is the state of the program when I
> load it (and use it). If I wish to change it, I *will*, and if I leave
> it there when I close the program down, *it* becomes the defult, until
> I change it again.
>
>>> but I've kept it sorted by date 99% of the time.
>>> Sorry you dont approve, or have to use Google because you don't have a
>>> decent newsreader, but that's *your* problem, not mine.
>
>> I have Free Agent... don't like it. OE sucks. Google used to be
>>delayed but is now real time and works pretty well. If you haven't
>>used it lately you might try it. You've chosen to buy Agent and thats
>>fine, I've chosen not too spend for usenet :).
>
> I use Google if I need to do reserch. Otherwise, I prefer to use
> Agent, which, as you don't seem to know, I use for mail as well as
> USENET. I would have chosen a third party program for mail in any
> case.
Ever tried Eudora? Just a suggestion.
ScottW
ScottW
July 11th 05, 02:31 AM
"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On 9 Jul 2005 20:02:19 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>dave weil wrote:
>>> On 9 Jul 2005 19:15:27 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>>
>>> >dave weil wrote:
>>> >> On 9 Jul 2005 18:27:44 -0700, "ScottW" > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >> Well, my life is more than random BBQs.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Aaaah, the elitist arrogantly declare what is more or less in life.
>>> >>
>>> >> Failure to note the word "my" noted.
>>> >
>>> > Oh... then your life could be "less" than random BBQs.
>>>
>>> Uhhh, no.
>>
>> Uhhhh, yes... random BBQs could bring more to life. You see...it
>>simply isn't your call to make. Unless you're an elitist that is. Then
>>it still isn't, but you would just think it is.
>
> You're as confused as Mr. Ferstler.
>
> Your statement made no sense whatsoever.a
Sorry you couldn't follow... it was in a small way, philosophical.
Elitists always have a recognizing their arrogance.
>
>>> Are you ALWAYS this dense or is it just clogged arteries of the brain?
>>
>> There's that elitism again. Is it density or simple truth?
>
> It's simple truth that you are dense. I was speculating about the
> effect of your high fat diet.
>
>> Let's have a BBQ and discuss it :)
>
> Will you be on the spit?
I can see why you never get invited to BBQ's.
ScottW
sam
July 11th 05, 05:37 AM
"GeoSynch" > wrote ...
> Tom wrote:
>
>>> You first. Why would you have disappointed if I was Haugen?
>
>> Because I consider Doug a friend.
>
> That's interesting.
> What are your thoughts on George's unwarranted attacks on Haugen?
Everyone here is guilty of unwarranted attacks. Doug likes to stir it up
just like everyone else. He's a big boy. What he and George got going
on is their biz.
>> You seem to be a bit hostile.
>
> That may have been precipated by namecalling.
And Doug would have known better. He would have sent me an
email and said, "Dude, it's me."
>> Honestly, I don't even know what your issues are now,
>> ...other than George.
>
> Let's go with truth, justice and the American way.
and stirring it up on RAO. Seriously, not 99 out of 100 Christians
would consider your behavior Christian. You must belong to
a very special sect.
GeoSynch
July 11th 05, 06:26 AM
Tom wrote:
>>> Honestly, I don't even know what your issues are now,
>>> ...other than George.
>> Let's go with truth, justice and the American way.
> and stirring it up on RAO. Seriously, not 99 out of 100 Christians
> would consider your behavior Christian. You must belong to
> a very special sect.
What specific behavior?
It's beginning to sound to me like you're a moral relativist.
What are your views on abortion and homosexuality?
If you're a Christian, how do you square those views with what is
written in the Bible?
As a Christian, would you support or oppose the following:
Noting that in his Good Friday homily soon-to-be pope
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger condemned the "filth there is
in the church," Wheeler believes the pontiff "will not
tolerate [homosexuality's] presence in his church."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44074
GeoSynch
Lionel
July 11th 05, 09:15 AM
sam' surf wrote :
> "GeoSynch" > wrote ...
>
> Seriously, not 99 out of 100 Christians
> would consider your behavior Christian. You must belong to
> a very special sect.
You are wrong, Surf. Totally wrong.
It's like to say that Taliban aren't Muslims or that Middius
isn't an homosexual.
As long as behaviours are driven by fear, aversion and
frustration even the most peaceful philosophy give birth to
monsters like them.
The arabic world is so full of frustration that you can kill
all the al qaeda leaders, this will not stop islamic terrorism.
Geosynch belongs to the Christian inquisition resurgence his
discourse is also driven by hate, fear and frustration. Even
if it *seems* to be antogonist to Middius' one his behaviour
belongs to the same category.
Ironically despite all his lies, swindles and treason it's
thank to Middius and his fellows that GeoStink's champion is
still in the oval office. :-(
dave weil
July 11th 05, 02:11 PM
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 18:28:23 -0700, "ScottW" >
wrote:
>> I use Google if I need to do reserch. Otherwise, I prefer to use
>> Agent, which, as you don't seem to know, I use for mail as well as
>> USENET. I would have chosen a third party program for mail in any
>> case.
>
>Ever tried Eudora? Just a suggestion.
Didn't like it. But thanks anyway.
George Middius
July 11th 05, 02:52 PM
Stynchblob has his hand in his pants again.
>So, George, did you turn into a homo because women find
>you so hideously repulsive?
I'm not a chubby chaser, if that's what's on your tiny mind.
Do you get a stiffy when you watch Nazis do the Sieg Heil salute?
George Middius
July 11th 05, 03:00 PM
I'm firing up my dragon and coming to get you, Slut!
>... Middius isn't an homosexual.
>As long as behaviours are driven by fear, aversion and
>frustration even the most peaceful philosophy give birth to
>monsters like them.
You don't know what horrors are in store for you, Slut. I will cast you into a
pit of vipers! I will toss you into the desert to be eaten by vultures! I will
french-fry you in a vat of boiling oil! BWA-HAHAHAHAHA!
Be afraid, Slut. Be very afraid.
Oh, and for the topper, I'll hand you over to Stynchblob, who will drag you into
his closet and have his way with you repeatedly. Enjoy! ;-)
sam
July 11th 05, 03:30 PM
"GeoSynch" > wrote
>
>> and stirring it up on RAO. Seriously, not 99 out of 100 Christians
>> would consider your behavior Christian. You must belong to
>> a very special sect.
>
> What specific behavior?
I'm not going to dig up specific quotes. I'm talking
about your hostility and apparent hatred. Even in the name of
evangelism, those aren't Christian attributes. I'm not claiming
to be above the same behavior. I'm just trying to get you to
admit the same.
> It's beginning to sound to me like you're a moral relativist.
> What are your views on abortion and homosexuality?
> If you're a Christian, how do you square those views with what is
> written in the Bible?
The Bible has many different interpretations - especially
the Old Testament. My beliefs are personal and I'm not about
to discuss them here.
Lionel
July 11th 05, 03:39 PM
George "Minion" Middius wrote :
> I'm firing up my dragon and coming to get you, Slut!
What a nice and delicate metaphor to say that you're still suffering of
aerophagia. I hope that you have the legal "Do not smoking" warning
tattooed on the left cheek, eh George ?
> Oh please, and for the topper, you'll hand me over to Stynchblob, who will
> drag me into his closet and have his way with me repeatedly. Enjoy! ;-)
George, I'm sure that if you ask him kindly... And perhaps he will authorize
you to call him Daddy too. ;-)
sam
July 11th 05, 05:00 PM
"GeoSynch" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> Tom is listing off the letters of the alphabet:
>
>>>> Have we met in person?
>
>>> No.
Have we spoke on the phone?
Lionel
July 11th 05, 07:09 PM
sam a écrit :
> "GeoSynch" > wrote
>
>>>and stirring it up on RAO. Seriously, not 99 out of 100 Christians
>>>would consider your behavior Christian. You must belong to
>>>a very special sect.
>>
>>What specific behavior?
>
>
> I'm not going to dig up specific quotes. I'm talking
> about your hostility and apparent hatred. Even in the name of
> evangelism, those aren't Christian attributes. I'm not claiming
> to be above the same behavior. I'm just trying to get you to
> admit the same.
>
>
>>It's beginning to sound to me like you're a moral relativist.
>>What are your views on abortion and homosexuality?
>>If you're a Christian, how do you square those views with what is
>>written in the Bible?
>
>
> The Bible has many different interpretations - especially
> the Old Testament. My beliefs are personal and I'm not about
> to discuss them here.
Religion is a personal way.
GeoStink (like Taliban) would like to built a social model
from their beliefs. They are so vainglorious and so lazy
that they cannot take the responsability of their petty
behaviour.
It's always easier to point out other's sins than to take
care of yours. This is why for GeoStink like for the
Talibans, women, homosexuals... are the low moral reference
standard they use to gauge their own holiness.
It is very sad to note that when they find a leader holy
warriors like GeoStink are ready to the worst crimes in the
name of the respect of the life. History is full of their
wrongdoings.
Forget this *******, Surf compare to him your worst RAO
enemy is surely an angel.
GeoSynch
July 12th 05, 03:58 AM
Boy George is off to the races:
>>So, George, did you turn into a homo because women find
>>you so hideously repulsive?
> I'm not a chubby chaser, if that's what's on your tiny mind.
Pudge the Gimp don't get around much anymore.
About the only chub the shut-in could chase would be "him"self.
> Do you get a stiffy when you watch Nazis do the Sieg Heil salute?
You seem to be fixated on Nazis. Is it an S&M-type thing?
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 12th 05, 04:07 AM
Sam wrote:
>> What specific behavior?
> I'm not going to dig up specific quotes. I'm talking
> about your hostility and apparent hatred. Even in the name of
> evangelism, those aren't Christian attributes. I'm not claiming
> to be above the same behavior. I'm just trying to get you to
> admit the same.
This was founded a Christian nation, and I'm not the only one
getting fed up with the hostility bordering on persecution directed
against us by the shrill, godless secularists.
>> It's beginning to sound to me like you're a moral relativist.
>> What are your views on abortion and homosexuality?
>> If you're a Christian, how do you square those views with what is
>> written in the Bible?
> The Bible has many different interpretations - especially
> the Old Testament. My beliefs are personal and I'm not about
> to discuss them here.
A cop-out .. but I can dig it. I understand where you're coming from.
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 12th 05, 04:12 AM
The Court Jester waggles his spindly fingers:
> Religion is a personal way.
How does it feel, bumbler, knowing your children when
they grow up will have to probably abide by sharia law?
When the France that you used to know will no longer be.
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 12th 05, 04:16 AM
Tom wrote:
>>>>> Have we met in person?
>>>> No.
> Have we spoke on the phone?
No, I've never spoken on the phone with any rao-er.
I've only communicate via private e-mail with Stever Zipser,
Dave Weil, Michael Gindi, Doug Haugen and, horrors, the Mid-Yut.
GeoSynch
sam
July 12th 05, 05:38 AM
"GeoSynch" > wrote...
> I've only communicate via private e-mail with Stever Zipser,
> Dave Weil, Michael Gindi, Doug Haugen and, horrors, the Mid-Yut.
Why? Who initiated them?
GeoSynch
July 12th 05, 05:58 AM
sam wrote:
>> I've only communicate[d] via private e-mail with Stever Zipser,
>> Dave Weil, Michael Gindi, Doug Haugen and, horrors, the Mid-Yut.
> Why? Who initiated them?
I initiated the one with Haugen to see if the e-mail address was legit.
The others wrote to me first, the particulars which I do not intend to divulge.
GeoSynch
Lionel
July 12th 05, 08:46 AM
GeoSynch a écrit :
> The Court Jester waggles his spindly fingers:
>
>
>>Religion is a personal way.
>
>
> How does it feel, bumbler, knowing your children when
> they grow up will have to probably abide by sharia law?
Is it the only alternative to your feudal Christianism ? :-)
> When the France that you used to know will no longer be.
Why do you care since you will be burning in the hell ? :-D
Lionel
July 12th 05, 10:11 AM
GeoGag cannot resist to make an ass of himself :
> The Court Jester waggles his spindly fingers:
>
>
>>Religion is a personal way.
>
>
> How does it feel, bumbler, knowing your children when
> they grow up will have to probably abide by sharia law?
>
> When the France that you used to know will no longer be.
This has nothing to do with religion, idiot, only with politic.
Are you the one who speaks further of "incisive witticisms"
? <LOL>
An advice for you Old fart, you should use the crucifix for
introspection purpose only not for anal masturbation.
For that you can still ask to your friend Middius, I'm sure
he will be happy to help you. :-D
PS : I am not anymore surprised that you prefer to hide your
real name, Morôn.
GeoSynch
July 12th 05, 12:02 PM
Froggy's getting cranky:
>> How does it feel, bumbler, knowing your children when
>> they grow up will have to probably abide by sharia law?
>> When the France that you used to know will no longer be.
> An advice for you...
Your first response was soooooo lame, you decided to try again
an hour-and-a-half later with something decidedly less lame, but,
alas, the best you can do is some grotesque vulgarities, which is
usually the last recourse for a simpleton who's run out of any
meaningful rhetorical parry. Too bad, loser.
GeoSynch
EddieM
July 12th 05, 12:39 PM
> Margaret von B. wrote
>
>
> Aside from audio and music, that is.
To kick an Objectivist borg for jesus from time to time.
Lionel
July 12th 05, 12:53 PM
GeoStink student in holiness wrote :
> Froggy's getting cranky:
>
>
>>>How does it feel, bumbler, knowing your children when
>>>they grow up will have to probably abide by sharia law?
>
>
>>>When the France that you used to know will no longer be.
>
>
>>An advice for you...
>
>
> Your first response was soooooo lame, you decided to try again
> an hour-and-a-half later with something decidedly less lame,
As lame as your confusion between religion as a personal way
and world geopolitic ? :-D
Is it because you are really ashame of your moronic
argumentation that you have snipped it. ;-)
Note that it was just an other argument to prove the group
that you are an pathetic idiot. ;-)
> but,
> alas, the best you can do is some grotesque vulgarities,
My vulgarity is in my words only since your is in your
behaviour.
> which is
> usually the last recourse for a simpleton who's run out of any
> meaningful rhetorical parry.
Blah, blah, blah, with such moronic arguments I bet that in
your congregation you are in charge of the kindergarten
evangelization.
> Too bad, loser.
Me a loser ? I already know that and I'm already laughing
when I imagine your face the Day Of Your Judgement. :-D
> GeoStink
sam
July 12th 05, 01:59 PM
"GeoSynch"
....
> sam wrote:
>
>>> I've only communicate[d] via private e-mail with Stever Zipser,
>>> Dave Weil, Michael Gindi, Doug Haugen and, horrors, the Mid-Yut.
>
>> Why? Who initiated them?
>
> I initiated the one with Haugen to see if the e-mail address was legit.
> The others wrote to me first,
Were they writing to you as Geo or when you used your name?
Must have been "Geo".
> ...........the particulars which I do not intend to divulge.
a cop out... but that's cool. I understand. ;-)
Interestingly, your buddy Malesweski was incensed that Dave
would post private email, while he himself has done it many
times in the past. What is that called...........? ? ?
Arny Krueger
July 12th 05, 02:17 PM
"EddieM" > wrote in message
>> Margaret von B. wrote
>>
>>
>> Aside from audio and music, that is.
> To kick an Objectivist borg for jesus from time to time.
Thanks for admitting that hatred is your primary motivation,
Eddie.
George Middius
July 12th 05, 03:17 PM
sam said:
>Interestingly, your buddy Malesweski was incensed that Dave
>would post private email, while he himself has done it many
>times in the past. What is that called...........? ? ?
It's called "being a good Christian soldier". The ends justify any means, no
matter how shameful.
George Middius
July 12th 05, 03:18 PM
The Krooborg begs for more recognition.
>> To kick an Objectivist borg for jesus from time to time.
>Thanks for admitting that hatred is your primary motivation,
>Eddie.
I don't think Eddie has explicitly stated that he hates you, Turdy. In fact, he
might be withholding that declaration because he knows how gratifying it would
be for you to hear it.
GeoSynch
July 12th 05, 08:56 PM
Pepe LePew is still in a decade-long funk:
>> Too bad, loser.
> Me a loser ? I already know that and I'm already laughing when I imagine your
> face the Day Of Your Judgement. :-D
An article, from The Guardian no less, explains it all:
"The French are trying to find reasons to be cheerful. They are
being urged to consider all the good things France has going for it
in order to dispel the pessimism which has pervaded the country."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/france/story/0%2C11882%2C1526635%2C00.html
Poor little Froggy...
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 12th 05, 09:02 PM
sam is on the case:
> Were they writing to you as Geo or when you used your name?
> Must have been "Geo".
Brilliant deduction, Holmes! You *did* put your Thinking Cap on.
>> ...........the particulars which I do not intend to divulge.
> a cop out... but that's cool. I understand. ;-)
I'm glad to hear that.
> Interestingly, your buddy Malesweski was incensed that Dave
> would post private email, while he himself has done it many
> times in the past. What is that called...........? ? ?
The pot and the kettle?
The goose and the gander?
A hippo having crises?
GeoSynch
Lionel
July 12th 05, 09:09 PM
GeoStink wrote :
> Pepe LePew is still in a decade-long funk:
>
>>> Too bad, loser.
>
>> Me a loser ? I already know that and I'm already laughing when I imagine
>> your face the Day Of Your Judgement. :-D
[snip]
> Poor little Froggy...
Geostink has spent a day digging in the international medias because he is
vexed of the spanking he received from a little froggy. ;-)
You are a pathetic. ;-)
GeoSynch
July 12th 05, 09:17 PM
Pepe LePew thinks he's onto something:
>> Pepe LePew is still in a decade-long funk:
>>>> Too bad, loser.
>>> Me a loser ? I already know that...
>> Poor little Froggy...
> Geostink has spent a day digging in the international medias because he is
> vexed of the spanking he received from a little froggy. ;-)
Wrong, moron. It was the top item on Page 2 of WorldNetDaily today:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/page2.asp
> You are a pathetic. ;-)
You are a buffoon.
GeoSynch
Lionel
July 12th 05, 09:25 PM
In t>, GeoSynch wrote :
> Pepe LePew thinks he's onto something:
>
>>> Pepe LePew is still in a decade-long funk:
>
>>>>> Too bad, loser.
>
>>>> Me a loser ? I already know that...
>
>>> Poor little Froggy...
>
>> Geostink has spent a day digging in the international medias because he
>> is vexed of the spanking he received from a little froggy. ;-)
>
> Wrong, moron. It was the top item on Page 2 of WorldNetDaily today:
>
> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/page2.asp
Perhaps but up to now you was only reading the first page. ;-)
This discussion with me have at least the advantage to kick you out of your
bovine laziness.
>> You are a pathetic. ;-)
>
> You are a buffoon.
You are more and more pathetic.
Margaret von B.
July 13th 05, 02:56 AM
"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> In t>, GeoSynch wrote :
>
>> Pepe LePew thinks he's onto something:
>>
>>>> Pepe LePew is still in a decade-long funk:
>>
>>>>>> Too bad, loser.
>>
>>>>> Me a loser ? I already know that...
>>
>>>> Poor little Froggy...
>>
>>> Geostink has spent a day digging in the international medias because he
>>> is vexed of the spanking he received from a little froggy. ;-)
>>
>> Wrong, moron. It was the top item on Page 2 of WorldNetDaily today:
>>
>> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/page2.asp
>
> Perhaps but up to now you was only reading the first page. ;-)
> This discussion with me have at least the advantage to kick you out of
> your
> bovine laziness.
>
>>> You are a pathetic. ;-)
>>
>> You are a buffoon.
>
> You are more and more pathetic.
Where is the BigStiltonBorg when he is needed to restore order?
:-)
Margaret
Geosynch misses the fundamentals:
>This was founded a Christian nation, and I'm not the only one
>getting fed up with the hostility bordering on persecution directed
>against us by the shrill, godless secularists.
This nation was founded by people who were Christians, but it was not
founded as a Christian nation, rather it was founded on the belief that
people should be free to be godless if they chose and the laws we
crafted to allow them that freedom.
As an atheist who believes in letting everybody seek heaven or not, so
long as they leave their fellow humans alone, I can say that I'm just
as afraid of rabid Christians as I am of rabid Muslims, or rabid
atheists.
Clyde Slick
July 13th 05, 03:47 AM
"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> GeoGag cannot resist to make an ass of himself :
>
>
> PS : I am not anymore surprised that you prefer to hide your real name,
> Morôn.
Sorry, I thought you were talking to Torresists.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
sam
July 13th 05, 04:22 AM
"GeoSynch" > wrote in ...
>
> Brilliant deduction, Holmes! You *did* put your Thinking Cap on.
I know who you are.
>> Interestingly, your buddy Malesweski was incensed that Dave
>> would post private email, while he himself has done it many
>> times in the past. What is that called...........? ? ?
>
> The pot and the kettle?
> The goose and the gander?
> A hippo having crises?
yes! the hippo thing!
GeoSynch
July 13th 05, 04:37 AM
sam smurfed:
>> Brilliant deduction, Holmes! You *did* put your Thinking Cap on.
> I know who you are.
We can both agree I'm not Doug Haugen.
>>> Interestingly, your buddy Malesweski was incensed that Dave
>>> would post private email, while he himself has done it many
>>> times in the past. What is that called...........? ? ?
>> The pot and the kettle?
>> The goose and the gander?
>> A hippo having crises?
> yes! the hippo thing!
You said it, Peter Potomas.
GeoSynch
GeoSynch
July 13th 05, 04:44 AM
Mikey flubs it:
>>This was founded a Christian nation, and I'm not the only one
>>getting fed up with the hostility bordering on persecution directed
>>against us by the shrill, godless secularists.
> This nation was founded by people who were Christians, but it was not
> founded as a Christian nation, rather it was ...
Some enlightenment for you, Mikey:
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/12/22/184440.shtml
Scroll down to see the quotes from Patrick Henry, John Quincy Adams
and George Washington.
GeoSynch
Lionel
July 13th 05, 09:24 AM
In >, Margaret von B. wrote :
>
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In t>, GeoSynch wrote
>> :
>>
>>> Pepe LePew thinks he's onto something:
>>>
>>>>> Pepe LePew is still in a decade-long funk:
>>>
>>>>>>> Too bad, loser.
>>>
>>>>>> Me a loser ? I already know that...
>>>
>>>>> Poor little Froggy...
>>>
>>>> Geostink has spent a day digging in the international medias because he
>>>> is vexed of the spanking he received from a little froggy. ;-)
>>>
>>> Wrong, moron. It was the top item on Page 2 of WorldNetDaily today:
>>>
>>> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/page2.asp
>>
>> Perhaps but up to now you was only reading the first page. ;-)
>> This discussion with me have at least the advantage to kick you out of
>> your
>> bovine laziness.
>>
>>>> You are a pathetic. ;-)
>>>
>>> You are a buffoon.
>>
>> You are more and more pathetic.
>
> Where is the BigStiltonBorg when he is needed to restore order?
I don't know but you arrived just in time to get Middius' load in your
glasses...
Congratulations ! ;-)
Lionel wrote:
> In >, Margaret von B. wrote :
>
> >
> > "Lionel" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> In t>, GeoSynch wrote
> >> :
> >>
> >>> Pepe LePew thinks he's onto something:
> >>>
> >>>>> Pepe LePew is still in a decade-long funk:
> >>>
> >>>>>>> Too bad, loser.
> >>>
> >>>>>> Me a loser ? I already know that...
> >>>
> >>>>> Poor little Froggy...
> >>>
> >>>> Geostink has spent a day digging in the international medias because he
> >>>> is vexed of the spanking he received from a little froggy. ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Wrong, moron. It was the top item on Page 2 of WorldNetDaily today:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/page2.asp
> >>
> >> Perhaps but up to now you was only reading the first page. ;-)
> >> This discussion with me have at least the advantage to kick you out of
> >> your
> >> bovine laziness.
> >>
> >>>> You are a pathetic. ;-)
> >>>
> >>> You are a buffoon.
> >>
> >> You are more and more pathetic.
> >
> > Where is the BigStiltonBorg when he is needed to restore order?
>
> I don't know but you arrived just in time to get Middius' load in your
> glasses...
>
>
Bottoms up!
>
>
.....and no gargling, SackMan. :-(
>
>
> Congratulations ! ;-)
>
>
sam
July 13th 05, 02:01 PM
"GeoSynch" > wrote...
>
> We can both agree I'm not Doug Haugen.
and because you're such a fine Christian, you would never lie,
so that leaves just one possibility.
George Middius
July 13th 05, 03:59 PM
Mickey, did you change your meds?
>This nation was founded by people who were Christians, but it was not
>founded as a Christian nation, rather it was founded on the belief that
>people should be free to be godless if they chose and the laws we
>crafted to allow them that freedom.
Did you really write that? Not only do I agree with it, but it's also cogent and
concise. The new meds are working for you.
sam
July 14th 05, 01:09 AM
dick Malesweski gives advice from his personal experience:
>>
> ....and no gargling, SackMan. :-(
Why so bitter, dick?
Where are you going to be Sep 10 and 11, dick?
Riding in a truck?
GeoSynch
July 14th 05, 03:55 AM
Yosemite Sam is a-rootin' and a-tootin':
>> We can both agree I'm not Doug Haugen.
> and because you're such a fine Christian, you would never lie,
> so that leaves just one possibility.
Ohhhh noooooooo!!! The jig is up.
GeoSynch
sam
July 14th 05, 05:52 AM
"GeoSynch" > wrote
>
> Ohhhh noooooooo!!! The jig is up.
LOL
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.