Atkinson lies, again

[Arny Krueger]

John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
conversation I had with Graham.

John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the alleged
phone call by Graham.

Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.

Very sad and childlike.

I wonder what power Graham has over Atkinson. Perhaps John
revealed something damaging offline that Graham now holds
over John's head.

[Lionel]

Arny Krueger a écrit :
> John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
> conversation I had with Graham.
>
> John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the alleged
> phone call by Graham.
>
> Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.
>
> Very sad and childlike.
>
> I wonder what power Graham has over Atkinson. Perhaps John
> revealed something damaging offline that Graham now holds
> over John's head.

IMHO if John Atkinson would like to be publicly insulted he
wouldn't act differently. :-(

[Arny Krueger]

Lionel wrote:
> Arny Krueger a écrit :
>> John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
>> conversation I had with Graham.
>>
>> John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the alleged
>> phone call by Graham.
>>
>> Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.
>>
>> Very sad and childlike.
>>
>> I wonder what power Graham has over Atkinson. Perhaps
John
>> revealed something damaging offline that Graham now holds
>> over John's head.
>
> IMHO if John Atkinson would like to be publicly insulted
he
> wouldn't act differently. :-(

Too bad there's such a lack of functional adults around
here.

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
> conversation I had with Graham.
>
> John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the alleged
> phone call by Graham.
>
> Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.
>
> Very sad and childlike.
>
> I wonder what power Graham has over Atkinson. Perhaps John
> revealed something damaging offline that Graham now holds
> over John's head.
>
>
It's really simple, Arny: John Atkinson is a transparent, petty,
vindictive scam artist. Sending you just a snippet instead of the whole
file fits right in with his "character", as does passive-aggressively
sabotaging your opening presentation at HE2005.
>
>

[Arny Krueger]

wrote:
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
>> conversation I had with Graham.
>>
>> John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the alleged
>> phone call by Graham.

>> Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.

>> Very sad and childlike.

>> I wonder what power Graham has over Atkinson. Perhaps
John
>> revealed something damaging offline that Graham now holds
>> over John's head.

> It's really simple, Arny: John Atkinson is a transparent,
petty,
> vindictive scam artist.

As indicated by his alliance with that sockpuppet who
sometimes goes as Graham.

> Sending you just a snippet instead of the
> whole file fits right in with his "character", as does
> passive-aggressively sabotaging your opening presentation
at HE2005.

More RAO as a child's playground.

[George Middius]

Little **** cranks up his slander module. Er, I mean his libel module, as
Krooger himself concisely observed. Arnii, I meant to ask: Is your aversion to
the term "slander" is based on your documented inability to spell it correctly?

>John Atkinson is a transparent,

That's an opinion.

> petty,

opinion

>vindictive

opinion

> scam artist

SLANDER!

You did it, Thing. You've earned your Kroo-turd for the week.

[George Middius]

Hypocracy™Borg lights up a fat one.

>More RAO as a child's playground.

RAO's most prolific poster (1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and
2005):

Arnii F. Krooger

[Arny Krueger]

George Middius wrote:
> HypocracyTBorg lights up a fat one.
>
>> More RAO as a child's playground.
>
> RAO's most prolific poster (1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003,
> 2004, and 2005):
>
> Arnii F. Krooger

There ain't no such person, is there George?

[John Atkinson]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
> conversation I had with Graham.

Actually, I promised you I would send you the file
I had in my possession. I didn't claim it was a
complete recording of the entire conversation. As
you had been claiming a) that the recording didn't
exist and b) that if a recording didn't exist, it
wasn't your voice, I felt that sending you what I
had would resolve both those matters for you.

> John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the
> alleged phone call by Graham.

That is correct. I had already told you that the
file had been redacted, leaving just your voice,
so I fail to understand why this came as such a
surprise to you.

> Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.

It does resolve 2 issues: 1) that the recording
exists and 2) that it is your voice, both issues
you had contested at length in the past.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> George Middius wrote:
> > HypocracyTBorg lights up a fat one.
> >
> >> More RAO as a child's playground.
> >
> > RAO's most prolific poster (1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
> 2002, 2003,
> > 2004, and 2005):
> >
> > Arnii F. Krooger
>
> There ain't no such person, is there George?
>
>
Just like there's no such person as "George M. Middius". :-D

[Lionel]

Arny Krueger a écrit :
> Lionel wrote:
>
>>Arny Krueger a écrit :
>>
>>>John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
>>>conversation I had with Graham.
>>>
>>>John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the alleged
>>>phone call by Graham.
>>>
>>>Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.
>>>
>>>Very sad and childlike.
>>>
>>>I wonder what power Graham has over Atkinson. Perhaps
>
> John
>
>>>revealed something damaging offline that Graham now holds
>>>over John's head.
>>
>>IMHO if John Atkinson would like to be publicly insulted
>
> he
>
>>wouldn't act differently. :-(
>
>
> Too bad there's such a lack of functional adults around
> here.

This is not the first time that he uses this kind of
childish stratagem.
I remember months ago when he wrote that you have modified
your website to hide a technical error he would have seen.
He pretended to have done a screen-copy.
I have requested (more than once) the file as a proof of the
alleged mystification... I never received anything and John
Atkinson has disappeared from RAO for few months...

Did he gave it to you during your meeting in NY ? ;-)

[Lionel]

Signal a écrit :
> " said :
>
> ">John Atkinson is a transparent, petty, vindictive scam artist."
>
> AOL would release your details without hesitation if presented with a
> subpoena, of course.

"Sticks and stones may hurt you, but words can only make
emotionally unbalanced people lose any semblance of reality..."

Paul Dormer.

[[email protected]]

Signal wrote:
> " said :
>
> ">John Atkinson is a transparent, petty, vindictive scam artist."
>
> AOL would release your details without hesitation if presented with a
> subpoena, of course.
>
>
Go for it, you lil' limey fudgepacker! ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

Lionel wrote:

> This is not the first time that he uses this kind of
> childish stratagem.
> I remember months ago when he wrote that you have modified
> your website to hide a technical error he would have seen.
> He pretended to have done a screen-copy.
> I have requested (more than once) the file as a proof of
the
> alleged mystification... I never received anything and
John
> Atkinson has disappeared from RAO for few months...

> Did he gave it to you during your meeting in NY ? ;-)

Of course not.

[Lionel]

In >, Signal wrote :

> "Lionel" emitted :
>
>>> ">John Atkinson is a transparent, petty, vindictive scam artist."
>>>
>>> AOL would release your details without hesitation if presented with a
>>> subpoena, of course.
>>
>>"Sticks and stones may hurt you, but words can only make
>>emotionally unbalanced people lose any semblance of reality..." **
>>
>>Paul Dormer.
>
> ** Exceptions : slander and libel.

Philosophy with variable geometry... good I hope it's not the same of your
apparent democratic involvement ? ;-)

Question where are the limits ? Legislation or Paul Dormer's specific
acceptance factor ? :-D

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
> conversation I had with Graham.
>
> John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the alleged
> phone call by Graham.
>
> Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.
>

If it wasn't you, how do you know it was only a part of the 'alleged'
converstation?



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...

> More RAO as a child's playground.
>
>
....says RAO's most prolific poster!!!
and more than six years runnng!



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Arny Krueger]

Clyde Slick wrote:

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
>> conversation I had with Graham.
>>
>> John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the alleged
>> phone call by Graham.
>>
>> Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.
>>
>
> If it wasn't you, how do you know it was only a part of
the 'alleged'
> converstation?

Atkinson admitted in the accompanying email that big pieces
of the conversation were missing. Also, some of the missing
pieces weren't so much cut out as blotted out with noise.

Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been able
to tell that the conversation was completely butchered.

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been able
> to tell that the conversation was completely butchered.
>

I would expect one of your usual converstations to
appear quite burchered to a normal person.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Arny Krueger]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been
able
>> to tell that the conversation was completely butchered.
>>
>
> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
> appear quite burchered to a normal person.

But, since you are so subnormal Art, you don't really know.

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been
> able
>>> to tell that the conversation was completely butchered.
>>>
>>
>> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>
> But, since you are so subnormal Art, you don't really know.
>

Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said to Mr. ****:

> Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?

If you want Arnii to participate, you have to include the optional Turd
Identification Section. Give Krooger the free points he's entitled to.

[Robert Morein]

"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Arny Krueger wrote:
> > John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
> > conversation I had with Graham.
>
> Actually, I promised you I would send you the file
> I had in my possession. I didn't claim it was a
> complete recording of the entire conversation. As
> you had been claiming a) that the recording didn't
> exist and b) that if a recording didn't exist, it
> wasn't your voice, I felt that sending you what I
> had would resolve both those matters for you.
>
John, he's a "28 DAYS" victim. Don't get too close to him, and keep a club
handy.

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> John, he's a "28 DAYS" victim. Don't get too close to him, and keep a club
> handy.

Have you heard The Tape?

[ScottW]

John Atkinson wrote:

> b) that if a recording didn't exist, it
> wasn't your voice,


Sorry but I had to laugh, perfect logic for RAO.

ScottW

[Schizoid Man]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
>>John, he's a "28 DAYS" victim. Don't get too close to him, and keep a club
>>handy.
>
> Have you heard The Tape?

What is on the tape, anyway? Why is everyone making such a fuss about it?

[ScottW]

Schizoid Man wrote:
> George M. Middius wrote:
> >
> > Robert Morein said:
> >
> >>John, he's a "28 DAYS" victim. Don't get too close to him, and keep a club
> >>handy.
> >
> > Have you heard The Tape?
>
> What is on the tape, anyway?

I heard it was Arny spewing profanity.

> Why is everyone making such a fuss about it?

Just to pull Kreugers chain and incite another exhibition of insanity
to which they can point and say... see I told u so.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Schizoid Man said:

> > Have you heard The Tape?
>
> What is on the tape, anyway? Why is everyone making such a fuss about it?

If you heard it, you'd have a new realization of how revolting Krooger is.

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
> > John, he's a "28 DAYS" victim. Don't get too close to him, and keep a
club
> > handy.
>
> Have you heard The Tape?
>
No. I am dying to.
ET, phone home: (215) 646-4894

[[email protected]]

George M. Middius wrote:
> Schizoid Man said:
>
> > > Have you heard The Tape?
> >
> > What is on the tape, anyway? Why is everyone making such a fuss about it?
>
> If you heard it, you'd have a new realization of how revolting Krooger is.
>
>
No "tape" needed to realize how revolting "Middius" is! :-)

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Schizoid Man said:
>
> > > Have you heard The Tape?
> >
> > What is on the tape, anyway? Why is everyone making such a fuss about
it?
>
> If you heard it, you'd have a new realization of how revolting Krooger is.
>
I have heard, from someone familiar with the tape, that it confirms that "he
is a genuinely nasty man in person as well as on the internet."

[jeffc]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> John Atkinson promised me an audio file of the phone
> conversation I had with Graham.
>
> John Atkinson just sent me a partial file of the alleged
> phone call by Graham.
>
> Partial = nothing worth commenting about further.
>
> Very sad and childlike.

Ironic. How old are you? You're going in my killfile never to be heard
from again.

[GeoSynch]

The Mid-Yut meanders:

> Is your aversion to the term "slander" is based on
> your documented inability to spell it correctly?

Nice bit of Krooglish there, eh Pudgy?


GeoSynch

[GeoSynch]

Clyde Slick, uhm, wrote:

> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
> appear quite burchered to a normal person.

You mean like the preceding sentence?


GeoSynch

[Robert Morein]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> In >, Signal wrote :
>
> > "Lionel" emitted :
> >
> >>> ">John Atkinson is a transparent, petty, vindictive scam artist."
> >>>
> >>> AOL would release your details without hesitation if presented with a
> >>> subpoena, of course.
> >>
> >>"Sticks and stones may hurt you, but words can only make
> >>emotionally unbalanced people lose any semblance of reality..." **
> >>
> >>Paul Dormer.
> >
> > ** Exceptions : slander and libel.
>
> Philosophy with variable geometry... good I hope it's not the same of your
> apparent democratic involvement ? ;-)
>
Lionel, are you a Left Bank Intellectual?
I am trying to tie together your reference to non Euclidean geometry to
Democracy and getting nowhere.
Does this have anything to do with Moral Relativism?
Quoting Rene Descartes, "I think therefore I am confused."


> Question where are the limits ? Legislation or Paul Dormer's specific
> acceptance factor ? :-D

In a closed Universe, there are no limits. You hurl an epithet, and it
travels a gazillion km and hits you in the ass.

[Clyde Slick]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> Lionel, are you a Left Bank Intellectual?


We don't know which side of the sewer pipe Lionel resides in.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[EddieM]

> Schizoid Man wrote
>
>
>
>
> What is on the tape, anyway? Why is everyone making such a fuss about it?



I recall listening to the beginning part of that conversation that was
posted with link through Angelfire back in, hmm oh I think in '02.
It was a well recorded telephone conversation that begun in an
amiable exchanges, IIRC, from both end of the line as greetings
and acknowledgement took place.

I remember hearing and listening to a poised, unruffled voice
from one end sounding very polite. I was riveted by the soulful
rhythm, and subdued by its gentle tone. It was unflappable yet,
graciously kind.

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :

> Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?

Poor Sackman.

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Lionel, are you a Left Bank Intellectual?
>
>
>
> We don't know which side of the sewer pipe Lionel resides in.

And Diogenes was living in a barrel.
You wouldn't appreciate... impossible for you to hide your
grotesque person in a corner ! :-)

[Lionel]

EddieM a écrit :
>>Schizoid Man wrote
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>What is on the tape, anyway? Why is everyone making such a fuss about it?
>
>
>
>
> I recall listening to the beginning part of that conversation that was
> posted with link through Angelfire back in, hmm oh I think in '02.
> It was a well recorded telephone conversation that begun in an
> amiable exchanges, IIRC, from both end of the line as greetings
> and acknowledgement took place.
>
> I remember hearing and listening to a poised, unruffled voice
> from one end sounding very polite. I was riveted by the soulful
> rhythm, and subdued by its gentle tone. It was unflappable yet,
> graciously kind.

:-)

[Lionel]

Robert Morein a écrit :
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>In >, Signal wrote :
>>
>>
>>>"Lionel" emitted :
>>>
>>>
>>>>>">John Atkinson is a transparent, petty, vindictive scam artist."
>>>>>
>>>>>AOL would release your details without hesitation if presented with a
>>>>>subpoena, of course.
>>>>
>>>>"Sticks and stones may hurt you, but words can only make
>>>>emotionally unbalanced people lose any semblance of reality..." **
>>>>
>>>>Paul Dormer.
>>>
>>>** Exceptions : slander and libel.
>>
>>Philosophy with variable geometry... good I hope it's not the same of your
>>apparent democratic involvement ? ;-)
>>
>
> Lionel, are you a Left Bank Intellectual?
> I am trying to tie together your reference to non Euclidean geometry to
> Democracy and getting nowhere.

My reference has nothing to do with non-euclidean geometry
Bob, just with aircraft construction. :-)

> Does this have anything to do with Moral Relativism?
> Quoting Rene Descartes, "I think therefore I am confused."
>
>
>
>>Question where are the limits ? Legislation or Paul Dormer's specific
>>acceptance factor ? :-D
>
>
> In a closed Universe, there are no limits. You hurl an epithet, and it
> travels a gazillion km and hits you in the ass.


Do you mean that George is paying the fault of one of is
ancestor ? :-D

[Lionel]

Schizoid Man a écrit :
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>>
>> Robert Morein said:
>>
>>> John, he's a "28 DAYS" victim. Don't get too close to him, and keep a
>>> club
>>> handy.
>>
>>
>> Have you heard The Tape?
>
>
> What is on the tape, anyway? Why is everyone making such a fuss about it?

Just an oldster who painfully tries to retie with teenager
phone jokes. To be sure of his success the "joker" has taken
care to be seriously drunk...

Pathetic. :-(

[Lionel]

Lionel a écrit :
> In >, Signal wrote :
>
>
>>"Lionel" emitted :
>>
>>
>>>>">John Atkinson is a transparent, petty, vindictive scam artist."
>>>>
>>>>AOL would release your details without hesitation if presented with a
>>>>subpoena, of course.
>>>
>>>"Sticks and stones may hurt you, but words can only make
>>>emotionally unbalanced people lose any semblance of reality..." **
>>>
>>>Paul Dormer.
>>
>>** Exceptions : slander and libel.
>
>
> Philosophy with variable geometry... good I hope it's not the same of your
> apparent democratic involvement ? ;-)
>
> Question where are the limits ? Legislation or Paul Dormer's specific
> acceptance factor ? :-D

No answer ?...
....Seems that Paul Dormer has eaten his cards. :-D

[EddieM]

> Lionel wrote
>> EddieM a écrit :
>>> Schizoid Man wrote
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>What is on the tape, anyway? Why is everyone making such a fuss about it?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I recall listening to the beginning part of that conversation that was
>> posted with link through Angelfire back in, hmm oh I think in '02.
>> It was a well recorded telephone conversation that begun in an
>> amiable exchanges, IIRC, from both end of the line as greetings
>> and acknowledgement took place.
>>
>> I remember hearing and listening to a poised, unruffled voice
>> from one end sounding very polite. I was riveted by the soulful
>> rhythm, and subdued by its gentle tone. It was unflappable yet,
>> graciously kind.
>
> :-)


I was not referring to the distinctive sound of Motown records if that's
what you're smiling about. Sorry to keep Thing disgruntled.

[Lionel]

EddieM a écrit :
>>Lionel wrote
>>
>>>EddieM a écrit :
>>>
>>>>Schizoid Man wrote
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What is on the tape, anyway? Why is everyone making such a fuss about it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I recall listening to the beginning part of that conversation that was
>>>posted with link through Angelfire back in, hmm oh I think in '02.
>>>It was a well recorded telephone conversation that begun in an
>>>amiable exchanges, IIRC, from both end of the line as greetings
>>>and acknowledgement took place.
>>>
>>>I remember hearing and listening to a poised, unruffled voice
>>>from one end sounding very polite. I was riveted by the soulful
>>>rhythm, and subdued by its gentle tone. It was unflappable yet,
>>>graciously kind.
>>
>>:-)

> I was not referring to the distinctive sound of Motown records if that's
> what you're smiling about.

:-)

> Sorry to keep Thing disgruntled.

No problem you, do what you wanna do with your life.

[Arny Krueger]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been
>> able
>>>> to tell that the conversation was completely butchered.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>>> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>>
>> But, since you are so subnormal Art, you don't really
know.
>>
>
> Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?

What challenge Art? Anybody who reads your posts here can
see that you're barely literate.

[Arny Krueger]

GeoSynch wrote:
> Clyde Slick, uhm, wrote:
>
>> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>
> You mean like the preceding sentence?

Art's barely literate.

[George M. Middius]

jeffc said to the Big ****:

> Ironic. How old are you? You're going in my killfile never to be heard
> from again.

I tried that, but I can't resist peeking from time to time.

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> GeoSynch wrote:
> > Clyde Slick, uhm, wrote:
> >
> >> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
> >> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
> >
> > You mean like the preceding sentence?
>
> Art's barely literate.
>
>
And just barely coherent. OTOH, "at least" SackO doesn't make the kind
of long, boring, droning, pointless posts that weil does.

[Arny Krueger]

wrote:
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> GeoSynch wrote:
>>> Clyde Slick, uhm, wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>>>> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>>>
>>> You mean like the preceding sentence?
>>
>> Art's barely literate.

> And just barely coherent. OTOH, "at least" SackO doesn't
make the kind
> of long, boring, droning, pointless posts that weil does.

You forgot trivial and obvious, although you implied them
with pointless and droning. ;-)

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been
>>> able
>>>>> to tell that the conversation was completely butchered.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>>>> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>>>
>>> But, since you are so subnormal Art, you don't really
> know.
>>>
>>
>> Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?
>
> What challenge Art? Anybody who reads your posts here can
> see that you're barely literate.
>
>

Thanks for admitting your failures.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Arny Krueger]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been
>>>> able
>>>>>> to tell that the conversation was completely
butchered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>>>>> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>>>>
>>>> But, since you are so subnormal Art, you don't really
>> know.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?
>>
>> What challenge Art? Anybody who reads your posts here can
>> see that you're barely literate.

> Thanks for admitting your failures.

....and barely coherent.

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been
>>>>> able
>>>>>>> to tell that the conversation was completely
> butchered.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>>>>>> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, since you are so subnormal Art, you don't really
>>> know.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?
>>>
>>> What challenge Art? Anybody who reads your posts here can
>>> see that you're barely literate.
>
>> Thanks for admitting your failures.
>
> ...and barely coherent.
>
>

I challenge you to an IQ test.
This is the third time I have challenged you.
You ducked the previous two times.
And now, you are pretending to be too stupid to inderstand this.
Not a good move for your team.





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Clyde Slick wrote:
>>
>>>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>>Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>
>>>>>>Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been
>>>>>>
>>>>>>able
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>to tell that the conversation was completely
>>
>>butchered.
>>
>>>>>>>I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>>>>>>>appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But, since you are so subnormal Art, you don't really
>>>>
>>>>know.
>>>>
>>>>>Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?
>>>>
>>>>What challenge Art? Anybody who reads your posts here can
>>>>see that you're barely literate.
>>
>>>Thanks for admitting your failures.
>>
>>...and barely coherent.
>>
>>
>
>
> I challenge you to an IQ test.
> This is the third time I have challenged you.

I challenged you to come here to tell your point about
France and Frenchs. I have challenged you more than 3 times...
But you are too coward, eh Sackman ?

Not a good move for your team. :-D

[Arny Krueger]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have
been
>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>> to tell that the conversation was completely
>> butchered.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>>>>>>> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, since you are so subnormal Art, you don't really
>>>> know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?
>>>>
>>>> What challenge Art? Anybody who reads your posts here
can
>>>> see that you're barely literate.
>>
>>> Thanks for admitting your failures.
>>
>> ...and barely coherent.
>
> I challenge you to an IQ test.

I don't believe in dueling an unarmed person, Art.

> This is the third time I have challenged you.

It's a bogus challenge, completely lacking in credibility
and reliability.

> You ducked the previous two times.

That's because I know that IQ tests are themselves bogus, or
shall we say measurements of variables with questionable
relevance. It appears that knowing that is beyond your level
of understanding, Art.

> And now, you are pretending to be too stupid to inderstand
this.

I admit it - I inderstand very little.

> Not a good move for your team.

It's like I'm going to take coaching instructions from you,
Art?

LOL!

[Lionel]

Arny Krueger a écrit :
> Clyde Slick wrote:

>>I challenge you to an IQ test.

> I don't believe in dueling an unarmed person, Art.

:-D

[dave weil]

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 07:23:52 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

wrote:
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>> GeoSynch wrote:
>>>> Clyde Slick, uhm, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>>>>> appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>>>>
>>>> You mean like the preceding sentence?
>>>
>>> Art's barely literate.
>
>> And just barely coherent. OTOH, "at least" SackO doesn't
>make the kind
>> of long, boring, droning, pointless posts that weil does.
>
>You forgot trivial and obvious, although you implied them
>with pointless and droning. ;-)

Get a room.

[George Middius]

Slut whined:

>I challenged you to come here to tell your point about
>France and Frenchs[sic].

I had an encounter with a French guy some years ago in Paris. Why are you people
so enamored of oral sex?

[Lionel]

George "SexBorg" Middius wrote :

>
>
> Slut whined:
>
>>I challenged you to come here to tell your point about
>>France and Frenchs[sic].
>
> I had an encounter with a French guy some years ago in Paris. Why are you
> people so enamored of oral sex?


I understand that George had *ONE* encounter with a French guy some years
ago and that he had an *HOMESEXUAL* relation with him.

Now George knows everything about the Frenchs sexuality. Exactly in the same
way that after a glass of Bordeaux he knew everything about French
wine... :-)

How can you be so stupid George ?

[George Middius]

dave weil said to ****-for-Brains:

>>>> Art's barely

>>> And just barely

>>You forgot

>Get a room.

I suspect that the apparent amity between these two would evaporate inside of
ten seconds if they ever occupied the same room.

[George Middius]

Slut whined:

>> I had an encounter with a French guy some years ago in Paris. Why are you
>> people so enamored of oral sex?

>Now George knows everything about the Frenchs[sic] sexuality.


Hello Slut, I snipped out the bulk of your gibbering in order to keep the
discussion reasonably concise.

When I asked your opinion about French people's love of oral sex, I was hoping
for some enlightenment. You being La Salope, I thought perhaps you might have
some insight. You can't beat the professional's viewpoint.

Instead, however, you gave us a defensive barrage of insults. What kind of whore
are you, anyway?

[Lionel]

George "SexBorg" Middius a écrit :

> Slut whined:
>
>
>>>I had an encounter with a French guy some years ago in Paris. Why are you
>>>people so enamored of oral sex?
>
>
>>Now George knows everything about the Frenchs[sic] sexuality.
>
>
>
> Hello Slut

Hello Ol' Fag. :-)

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick a écrit :
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>>>>
>>>>>Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Bottom line Art even a dummy like you would have been
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>able
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>to tell that the conversation was completely
>>>
>>>butchered.
>>>
>>>>>>>>I would expect one of your usual converstations to
>>>>>>>>appear quite burchered to a normal person.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But, since you are so subnormal Art, you don't really
>>>>>
>>>>>know.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ready to duck my IQ challenge for a third time?
>>>>>
>>>>>What challenge Art? Anybody who reads your posts here can
>>>>>see that you're barely literate.
>>>
>>>>Thanks for admitting your failures.
>>>
>>>...and barely coherent.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I challenge you to an IQ test.
>> This is the third time I have challenged you.
>
> I challenged you to come here to tell your point about France and Frenchs.
> I have challenged you more than 3 times...
> But you are too coward, eh Sackman ?
>
> Not a good move for your team. :-D

Send me a business class ticket and coupons
for free water at CDG. Air France will be just fine
by me.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...

>>
>> I challenge you to an IQ test.
>
> I don't believe in dueling an unarmed person, Art.
>

If you outscore me, it will be an
accomplishment you may rightly brag about,
you will score quite high



>> This is the third time I have challenged you.
>
> It's a bogus challenge, completely lacking in credibility
> and reliability.
>

More reliable than the pcabx test!

>> You ducked the previous two times.
>
> That's because I know that IQ tests are themselves bogus, or
> shall we say measurements of variables with questionable
> relevance. It appears that knowing that is beyond your level
> of understanding, Art.
>

I think you are a little sensitive, after all, you
do know approximately what you will score!




>> And now, you are pretending to be too stupid to inderstand
> this.
>
> I admit it - I inderstand very little.
>
>> Not a good move for your team.
>
> It's like I'm going to take coaching instructions from you,
> Art?
>

You take your team coaching form the "Ducks", I see



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> George "SexBorg" Middius wrote :
>
>>
>>
>> Slut whined:
>>
>>>I challenged you to come here to tell your point about
>>>France and Frenchs[sic].
>>
>> I had an encounter with a French guy some years ago in Paris. Why are you
>> people so enamored of oral sex?
>
>
> I understand that George had *ONE* encounter with a French guy some years
> ago and that he had an *HOMESEXUAL* relation with him.
>
> Now George knows everything about the Frenchs sexuality. Exactly in the
> same
> way that after a glass of Bordeaux he knew everything about French
> wine... :-)
>
> How can you be so stupid George ?

Maybe you should invite George to visit you, "eh"?



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[[email protected]]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
> > George "SexBorg" Middius wrote :
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Slut whined:
> >>
> >>>I challenged you to come here to tell your point about
> >>>France and Frenchs[sic].
> >>
> >> I had an encounter with a French guy some years ago in Paris. Why are you
> >> people so enamored of oral sex?
> >
> >
> > I understand that George had *ONE* encounter with a French guy some years
> > ago and that he had an *HOMESEXUAL* relation with him.
> >
> > Now George knows everything about the Frenchs sexuality. Exactly in the
> > same
> > way that after a glass of Bordeaux he knew everything about French
> > wine... :-)
> >
> > How can you be so stupid George ?
>
> Maybe you should invite George to visit you, "eh"?
>
>
>

"Fearless Middius" will gladly accept Lionel's challenge, but only if
he can fly to France on the Concorde. ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>>
>>> I challenge you to an IQ test.
>>
>> I don't believe in dueling an unarmed person, Art.
>>
>
> If you outscore me, it will be an
> accomplishment you may rightly brag about,
> you will score quite high

Art you're a walking-talking example of the fallacy of IQ
testing. If what you have is typical of having a high IQ, no
intelligent person would want it.

>>> This is the third time I have challenged you.

>> It's a bogus challenge, completely lacking in credibility
>> and reliability.

> More reliable than the pcabx test!

Says who?

>>> You ducked the previous two times.

>> That's because I know that IQ tests are themselves bogus,
or
>> shall we say measurements of variables with questionable
>> relevance. It appears that knowing that is beyond your
level
>> of understanding, Art.


> I think you are a little sensitive, after all, you
> do know approximately what you will score!

Do I? What should I expect to score and what do you expect
to score?

>>> And now, you are pretending to be too stupid to
inderstand
>> this.
>>
>> I admit it - I inderstand very little.
>>
>>> Not a good move for your team.

>> It's like I'm going to take coaching instructions from
you,
>> Art?

> You take your team coaching form the "Ducks", I see

Sue me for knowing the difference between from and form,
Art.

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>>
>>>> I challenge you to an IQ test.
>>>
>>> I don't believe in dueling an unarmed person, Art.
>>>
>>
>> If you outscore me, it will be an
>> accomplishment you may rightly brag about,
>> you will score quite high
>
> Art you're a walking-talking example of the fallacy of IQ
> testing. If what you have is typical of having a high IQ, no
> intelligent person would want it.
>

Yes, they would much prefer a general engineering
degree from oakland University!

>>>> This is the third time I have challenged you.
>
>>> It's a bogus challenge, completely lacking in credibility
>>> and reliability.
>
>> More reliable than the pcabx test!
>
> Says who?
>

"At least" its a test that can relaibly be given
on the pc!


>>>> You ducked the previous two times.
>
>>> That's because I know that IQ tests are themselves bogus,
> or
>>> shall we say measurements of variables with questionable
>>> relevance. It appears that knowing that is beyond your
> level
>>> of understanding, Art.
>
>
>> I think you are a little sensitive, after all, you
>> do know approximately what you will score!
>
> Do I? What should I expect to score and what do you expect
> to score?
>

You know what you should expect to score, I am sure
you have taken them before. I would not presume to know what you
would score.

As for what I would expect to score, I elect not to tell you that.


>>>> And now, you are pretending to be too stupid to
> inderstand
>>> this.
>>>
>>> I admit it - I inderstand very little.
>>>
>>>> Not a good move for your team.
>
>>> It's like I'm going to take coaching instructions from
> you,
>>> Art?
>
>> You take your team coaching form the "Ducks", I see
>
> Sue me for knowing the difference between from and form,
> Art.
>
Sue me for being a 'dab' typist.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Lionel]

Signal a écrit :
> "George Middius" emitted :
>
>
>>>I challenged you to come here to tell your point about
>>>France and Frenchs[sic].
>>
>>I had an encounter with a French guy some years ago in Paris. Why are you people
>>so enamored of oral sex?
>
>
> Takes the smell of garlic off the breath..

I didn't know that gays were particulary afraid about
vampires...
Did they replace young virgin girls as favourite preys ?

[George Middius]

Signal said:

>>>I challenged you to come here to tell your point about
>>>France and Frenchs[sic].

>>I had an encounter with a French guy some years ago in Paris. Why are
>>you people so enamored of oral sex?

>Takes the smell of garlic off the breath..

Har. But I wasn't talking about fish. <g>

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Signal a écrit :
>> "George Middius" emitted :
>>
>>
>>>>I challenged you to come here to tell your point about France and
>>>>Frenchs[sic].
>>>
>>>I had an encounter with a French guy some years ago in Paris. Why are you
>>>people
>>>so enamored of oral sex?
>>
>>
>> Takes the smell of garlic off the breath..
>
> I didn't know that gays were particulary afraid about vampires...
> Did they replace young virgin girls as favourite preys ?

gibberish



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

>>> Why are you people so enamored of oral sex?

> >> Takes the smell of garlic off the breath..

> > I didn't know that gays were particulary afraid about vampires...
> > Did they replace young virgin girls as favourite preys ?

> gibberish

We should get Thing to interpret Slut's nattering for us. He just claimed to
be fluent in Krooglish, so Sluttish should be a snap for him.

[Clyde Slick]

"Signal" > wrote in message
...
> "Clyde Slick" emitted :
>
>>> More RAO as a child's playground.
>>>
>>...says RAO's most prolific poster!!!
>
> He doesn't builds castles from sand, either...

Others like to vacation on sandy beaches, Arny prefers pastures
of cow pies.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[jeffc]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> jeffc said to the Big ****:
>
>> Ironic. How old are you? You're going in my killfile never to be heard
>> from again.
>
> I tried that, but I can't resist peeking from time to time.

Of course the problem is you can't read ANY thread, because he's in EVERY
thread, and someone will be quoting him.

[George M. Middius]

jeffc said:

> >> Ironic. How old are you? You're going in my killfile never to be heard
> >> from again.
> >
> > I tried that, but I can't resist peeking from time to time.
>
> Of course the problem is you can't read ANY thread, because he's in EVERY
> thread, and someone will be quoting him.

It does take willpower.

[George M. Middius]

Signal said:

> >Of course the problem is you can't read ANY thread, because he's in EVERY
> >thread, and someone will be quoting him.
>
> If you used Agent you be able to create a Usenet Filter which
> automatically strippes out and deletes all posts referencing Mr
> Krooger. I tried it and 890 odd posts were removed out of 600.

Ohmigod. Your newsreader may have been assimiliated. Quick, call
Dr. Crusher!

[[email protected]]

A glimpse into the "mind" of Paul Dormer:
>
Signal wrote:
>
<snipped>
>
I tried it and 890 odd posts were removed out of 600.
>
>
Paul Dormer has a mind like a steel trap: rusted and useless.
>
>
> Does anybody need instructions? Surely one for the FAQ!!
>
>
Yes, please.....600 minus 890 = ????

[Lionel]

In om>,
wrote :

> A glimpse into the "mind" of Paul Dormer:
>>
> Signal wrote:
>>
> <snipped>
>>
> I tried it and 890 odd posts were removed out of 600.
>>
>>
> Paul Dormer has a mind like a steel trap: rusted and useless.
>>
>>
>> Does anybody need instructions? Surely one for the FAQ!!
>>
>>
> Yes, please.....600 minus 890 = ????

He is a poker champion... ;-)

[Lionel]

In >, Signal wrote :

> "Lionel" emitted :
>
>>>>>>">John Atkinson is a transparent, petty, vindictive scam artist."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>AOL would release your details without hesitation if presented with a
>>>>>>subpoena, of course.
>>>>>
>>>>>"Sticks and stones may hurt you, but words can only make
>>>>>emotionally unbalanced people lose any semblance of reality..." **
>>>>>
>>>>>Paul Dormer.
>>>>
>>>>** Exceptions : slander and libel.
>>>
>>>
>>> Philosophy with variable geometry... good I hope it's not the same of
>>> your apparent democratic involvement ? ;-)
>>>
>>> Question where are the limits ? Legislation or Paul Dormer's specific
>>> acceptance factor ? :-D
>>
>>No answer ?...
>>...Seems that Paul Dormer has eaten his cards. :-D
>
> Sorry mate, didn't realise there was a deadline...

No deadline but a champion would never leave the table without an excuse or
explanation. It is also true for gentlman. ;-)

[Lionel]

George M. Middius <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote :

>
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>>>> Why are you people so enamored of oral sex?
>
>> >> Takes the smell of garlic off the breath..
>
>> > I didn't know that gays were particulary afraid about vampires...
>> > Did they replace young virgin girls as favourite preys ?
>
>> gibberish
>
> He just claimed.

Paul was right, why don't you brush your teeth ?

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
> :
>
>>
>>
>> Clyde Slick said:
>>
>>>>> Why are you people so enamored of oral sex?
>>
>>> >> Takes the smell of garlic off the breath..
>>
>>> > I didn't know that gays were particulary afraid about vampires...
>>> > Did they replace young virgin girls as favourite preys ?
>>
>>> gibberish
>>
>> He just claimed.
>
> Paul was right, why don't you brush your teeth ?

gibberish



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Lionel]

In >, Clyde Slick wrote :

>
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>> George M. Middius <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
>> wrote
>> :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Clyde Slick said:
>>>
>>>>>> Why are you people so enamored of oral sex?
>>>
>>>> >> Takes the smell of garlic off the breath..
>>>
>>>> > I didn't know that gays were particulary afraid about vampires...
>>>> > Did they replace young virgin girls as favourite preys ?
>>>
>>>> gibberish
>>>
>>> He just claimed.
>>
>> Paul was right, why don't you brush your teeth ?
>
> gibberish

Son of bitch. :-)

[George Middius]

Signal said:

>>Yes, please.....600 minus 890 = ????

>Omit one character from a post, and you go ballistic. Intriguing!

Little **** is starved for attention. Did you notice Big **** correcting
Little's "false claim" in another post? These two have yet to get their S&M
routines debugged.

[Lionel]

Signal a écrit :
> "Lionel" emitted :
>
>
>>>>>>>>">John Atkinson is a transparent, petty, vindictive scam artist."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>AOL would release your details without hesitation if presented with a
>>>>>>>>subpoena, of course.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Sticks and stones may hurt you, but words can only make
>>>>>>>emotionally unbalanced people lose any semblance of reality..." **
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Paul Dormer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>** Exceptions : slander and libel.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Philosophy with variable geometry... good I hope it's not the same of
>>>>>your apparent democratic involvement ? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>Question where are the limits ? Legislation or Paul Dormer's specific
>>>>>acceptance factor ? :-D
>>>>
>>>>No answer ?...
>>>>...Seems that Paul Dormer has eaten his cards. :-D
>>>
>>>Sorry mate, didn't realise there was a deadline...
>>
>>No deadline but a champion would never leave the table without an excuse or
>>explanation. It is also true for gentlman. ;-)
>
>
> You are stretching the analogy too far... ;-)

I am a Tarot player and at this game we say "there's no
little trick". :-)

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> In >, Clyde Slick wrote :
>
> Son of bitch. :-)
>

Daughter of a salope.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"George Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Signal said:
>
>>>Yes, please.....600 minus 890 = ????
>
>>Omit one character from a post, and you go ballistic. Intriguing!
>
> Little **** is starved for attention. Did you notice Big **** correcting
> Little's "false claim" in another post? These two have yet to get their
> S&M
> routines debugged.
>

When Arny is around, little man turns from a dominant to a submissive.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Lionel]

In >, Clyde Slick wrote :

>
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In >, Clyde Slick wrote :
>>
>> Son of bitch. :-)
>>
>
> Daughter of a salope.

It doesn't rhyme, idiot. :-(

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> In >, Clyde Slick wrote :
>
>>
>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> In >, Clyde Slick wrote :
>>>
>>> Son of bitch. :-)
>>>
>>
>> Daughter of a salope.
>
> It doesn't rhyme, idiot. :-(

Its not supposed to, moron



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----